clic organogram
DESCRIPTION
Interacts with overall global LC Collaboration, weekly 30-60 min meetings ( S.Stapnes repr . CLIC). CLIC Organogram. CB: Every 6 months, WP update and status, provide active feedback/ discussion with collaborators. Internal review committee(s) as needed, CERN MAC as overall review committee. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
CLIC OrganogramCLIC Collab. Board
L.RivkinMoU with annexes describing coll. efforts
(note: in reality more complicated)
CLIC SC (Stapnes)Repr. from CASC and DPSC and some
extra members, SM (FB) and SBIncludes L.Rivkin, L.Evans and
M.Harrison (ex officio)Meet afternoon after CERN SPCs
CASC (Stapnes)Activity managers (resp. for groups of WPs –
Schulte, Lebrun, Wuensch, Corsini, Schmickler) plus some extra members, includes E.J and O.B
Meet weekly 1 hour
DPSC (Linssen)Detector/Physics studies follow up and
planningInternal weekly meeting between SS and LL
(30-45min)
Detector and Physics Inst. Board, less formal agreement, based on declaration of interests and best
effort, IB chair F.Simon
Internal review committee(s) as needed, CERN MAC as overall review committee
Interacts with overall global LC Collaboration, weekly 30-60 min meetings (S.Stapnes repr. CLIC)
CB: Every 6 months, WP update and status, provide active feedback/discussion with collaborators
Project office: S.Stapnes, H.Schmickler, A.Augier (R.Corsini follows the fellow and personnel planning more generally)Work-agreements: annexes to MoU, annexes to co-operation agreements, annexes to specific MoUs and (more and more) k-contracts
2
Tunnel implementations (laser straight)
Central MDI & Interaction Region
CLIC near CERN
For CLIC five main priorities have been identified for 2018:• A re-baselined staged project implementation, cost and power
optimisation – increased industrialisation effort • High Gradient structure development and significantly
increased test-capacity for RF-structures • The systemtest programmes in CTF3, at ATF and in FACET,
as well as exploring systemtests in collaborative programmes with light-source laboratories
• Technical systems developments, related among others to complete modules, alignment/stability, instrumentation and power sources
• Physics studies related to energy frontier capabilities
Schulte (Design), Lebrun (Implementation)
Wuensch (Xband)
Corsini (Systemtests)
Schmickler (Technical Developments)
3
4
29 Countries – over 70 Institutes
Acceleratorcollaboration
Detectorcollaboration
Accelerator + Detector collaboration
CLIC Collaboration
6
Link: http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=275412
LC organisation
7
• Strongly support the Japanese initiative to construct a linear collider as a staged project in Japan
• Prepare CLIC machine and detectors as an option for a future high-energy linear collider at CERN
• Further improve collaboration between CLIC and ILC machine experts
• Move towards a “more normal” structure of collaboration in the detector community to prepare for the construction of two high-performance detectors
8
Main activities and goals for 2018
Design and Implementation studies:• CDR status: not optimized except at 3 TeV and not adjusted
for Higgs discovery, not optimized cost, first power/energy estimates without time for reductions, limited industrial costing, very limited reliability studies
• Baseline design and staging strategy• Solid cost basis and more optimized power/energy (aim for
20% energy reduction)• Proof of industry basis for key components/units, in particular
those specific for CLIC• Comprehensive reliability/robustness/uptime analysis • Pursue increased use of X-band for other
machines/applications
System-tests: • CDR status: CTF3 results initial phase (as of early 2012), ATF and
FACET very little, no convincing strategy for further system verification
• Complete system-tests foreseen for next phase, and comprehensive documentation of the results at CERN (CTF3) and elsewhere
• Strategy for further system verification before construction (XFEL, connected to light-sources, further drive-beam verifications) or as part of initial machine strategy.
• CDR status concerning drive-beam FE: Nothing done beyond CTF3 • Demonstrator of drive beam FE and RF power unit based on
industrial capacity – will open for larger facilities beyond 2018 if necessary
X-band developments: • CDR status: Single elements demonstrated – limited by test-
capacity• Statistics for gradient and structure choice (energy reach) and
other X-band elements
Technology developments: • CDR status: alignment/stability partly covered, BBA assumed,
wakefield mon. perf. assumed, no complete module • Demonstration of critical elements and methods for the
machine performance: DR, main linac, BDS with associated instrumentation and
correction methods (combination of design, simulation, system-tests and technologies)
Stability/alignment (locally and over distances) Module including all parts