city council agenda item report - granicus

96
City Council Agenda Item Report August 18, 2015 Agenda Item No. _______ Contact Stanley R. Fees, P.E., CFM City Engineer 312-0084 [email protected] SUBJECT: Deliberation and possible action approving the selection of the engineering firm Klotz Associates to provide engineering services related to the 2014 General Obligation Bond Proposition 3 Projects to the intersection of FM 967 and Main Street, other Main Street improvements, improvements to Old Goforth Road and San Antonio Street and/or other streets and road projects and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement. 1. BACKGROUND/HISTORY The City hired ECM International & HDR on February 17, 2015 to provide program management services for all five propositions of the 2014 General Obligation Bond Program projects. 2. FINDINGS/CURRENT ACTIVITY ECM prepared and issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for Streets on April 22, 2015. The RFQ was advertised in the Hays Free Press and on the city website. RFQ’s were submitted on May 21, 2015 at 4:00 PM. The RFQ’s were reviewed and ranked by a City Staff Review Committee consisting of Brian LaBorde, Stanley Fees, Mike Beggs, Drew Wells and Chance Sparks. The RFQ’s were also reviewed and ranked by HDR. A memo from HDR is attached to this report summarizing the selection of the firm for the street projects. HDR is recommending the contract for professional services for streets be awarded to Klotz Associates. The contract will cover the Old Goforth Road Improvements, San Antonio Street Improvements, Main Street at FM 967 Improvements and the Main Street Improvements.

Upload: others

Post on 29-May-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus

City Council Agenda Item Report August 18, 2015

Agenda Item No. _______ Contact – Stanley R. Fees, P.E., CFM City Engineer 312-0084

[email protected]

SUBJECT: Deliberation and possible action approving the selection of the

engineering firm Klotz Associates to provide engineering services related to the 2014 General Obligation Bond Proposition 3 Projects to the intersection of FM 967 and Main Street, other Main Street improvements, improvements to Old Goforth Road and San Antonio Street and/or other streets and road projects and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement.

1. BACKGROUND/HISTORY

The City hired ECM International & HDR on February 17, 2015 to provide program management services for all five propositions of the 2014 General Obligation Bond Program projects.

2. FINDINGS/CURRENT ACTIVITY ECM prepared and issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for Streets on April 22, 2015. The RFQ was advertised in the Hays Free Press and on the city website. RFQ’s were submitted on May 21, 2015 at 4:00 PM. The RFQ’s were reviewed and ranked by a City Staff Review Committee consisting of Brian LaBorde, Stanley Fees, Mike Beggs, Drew Wells and Chance Sparks. The RFQ’s were also reviewed and ranked by HDR. A memo from HDR is attached to this report summarizing the selection of the firm for the street projects. HDR is recommending the contract for professional services for streets be awarded to Klotz Associates. The contract will cover the Old Goforth Road Improvements, San Antonio Street Improvements, Main Street at FM 967 Improvements and the Main Street Improvements.

Page 2: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus

Klotz Associates will be performing the design, bidding and construction oversight for the street projects listed in the Bond. HDR will also provide oversight on the design, bidding and construction of these projects. Allen Crozier from HDR will be present to discuss the selection process and contracts.

3. FINANCIAL IMPACT

The Not To Exceed cost of the four contracts is as follows: Old Goforth Road Improvements (Task 1) $168,418.75 San Antonio Street Improvements (Task 2) $ 73,066.50 Main Street at FM 967 Improvements (Task 3) $ 76,376.50 Main Street Improvements (Task 4) $235,664.50 These professional services are funded by the 2014 General Obligation Bond Projects.

4. ACTION OPTIONS/RECOMMENDATION

Staff requests the City Council consider approval approving the selection of the engineering firm Klotz Associates to provide engineering services related to the 2014 General Obligation Bond Proposition 3 Projects to the intersection of FM 967 and Main Street, other Main Street improvements, improvements to Old Goforth Road and San Antonio Street and/or other streets and road projects and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement.

5. ATTACHMENTS

1. HDR memo on Professional Services Street Contract 2. Standard Contract / Professional Services Agreement from Klotz Associates

Page 3: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus

City of Buda, Texas 2014 Bond Program Staff Report City Council Meeting – August 18, 2015

Presentation of Street and Drainage Project Contracts to City Council

On behalf of the City of Buda 2014 Bond Program Steering Committee, The program management team

wishes to present the contracts for the street and drainage projects to the Buda City Council for

approval.

The procurement process followed the State requirements for Professional Services. For each service, a

request for qualification (RFQ) was posted to the City website and published in the local newspaper.

Participation

Ten (10) teams submitted Statements of Qualifications on the street projects.

• Alliance Transportation Group

• Cobb, Fendley & Associates

• Dannebaum Engineering

• Freese and Nichols, Inc.

• GarzaBury, Inc.

• RPS Klotz Associates

• LNV, Inc.

• Othon, Inc.

• The Schultz Group, Inc.

• Vickrey & Associates, Inc.

Ten (10) teams submitted Statements of Qualifications on the drainage projects.

• Othon, Inc.

• Scheibe Consulting, LLC

• Brown & Gay Engineers, Inc.

• Halff Associates, Inc.

• LNV, Inc.

• Freese and Nichols, Inc.

• Vickrey & Associates, Inc.

• RPS

• The Schultz Group, Inc.

• Jones and Carter

Evaluation

Written responses to the RFQ were received and scored by the Steering Committee members and one

representative of the program management team based on the scoring requirements set forth in the

RFQ and identified below.

• Team experience on similar projects,

Page 4: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus

• Project Manager experience on similar projects,

• Previous work performance,

• Project approach, and

• Ability to perform requested design tasks within proposed design schedule.

The three firms with the highest scores on their Statement of Qualifications were then asked to participate in an interview with members of the Bond Program Steering Committee and Program Management team.

Top three (3) highest ranked firms for the streets projects: • Cobb, Fendley & Associates

• RPS Klotz Associates

• Freese and Nichols, Inc.

Top three (3) highest ranked firms for the drainage projects: • Freese and Nichols, Inc.

• Brown & Gay Engineers, Inc.

• Halff Associates, Inc.

Teams were scored on their responses to the interview questions. Selections were based upon the combined scores from the Statement of Qualification and Interview.

RPS Klotz Associates was selected for the street projects and Freese and Nichols, Inc. was selected for the drainage projects.

Streets - Team composition RPS Klotz Associates – Prime Consultant

Cobb, Fendley & Associates – Utility Coordination / Design Chaparral Land Surveying – HUB – Design Survey HVJ, Inc. – HUB – Geotechnical Investigations / Design HRM Land Acquisitions, LLC – HUB – ROW Acquisition Horizon Environmental Services – HUB – Environmental Studies RVI Planning – Landscape / Context Sensitive Design

Streets - Past related projects Melody Lane Reconstruction –Friendswood, TX - $3.5M (Construction) City of Austin Rotation List – Austin, TX - $10.0M (Construction) Hunter Road Widening – Hays County, TX - $3.0M (Construction) Cottonwood Creek Trail – Cedar Park, TX - $5.8M (Construction) Bee Creek Road – Travis County, TX - $7.5M (Construction)

Drainage – Team composition Freese and Nichols, Inc. – Prime Consultant

Arias and Associates, Inc. – HUB – Geotechnical Investigations / Design CTC, Inc. - Railroad Coordination Frank Lam & Associates, Inc. – HUB – Structural Engineering/Design McGray & McGray Land Surveyors, Inc. – HUB – Design Survey The Rios Group, Inc. – HUB – Subsurface Utility Engineering/Coordination

Drainage – Past related projects Central Arlington Heights Drainage Improvements – Fort Worth, TX - $6.4M (Construction) Shoal Creek Allandale Storm Drain and Utility Improvement – Austin, TX - $6.7M (Construction) Green Meadows Drainage Improvement Project – Arlington, TX - $4.3M (Construction) Upper Walnut Creek Regional Erosion/Flood Control Facility – Austin, TX - $3.9M (Construction) MLK Transit Oriented Development Drainage Study/Design – Austin, TX - $7.8M (Construction HUB Participation HUB participants are identified in the team compositions above. Both the teams are committed to meeting

or exceeding the requested 12% HUB goal identified in the RFQ.

Page 5: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 6: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 7: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 8: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 9: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 10: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 11: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 12: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 13: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 14: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 15: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 16: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 17: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 18: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 19: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 20: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 21: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 22: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 23: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 24: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 25: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 26: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 27: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 28: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 29: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 30: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 31: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 32: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 33: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 34: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 35: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 36: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 37: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 38: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 39: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 40: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 41: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 42: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 43: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 44: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 45: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 46: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 47: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 48: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 49: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 50: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 51: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 52: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 53: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 54: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 55: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 56: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 57: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 58: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 59: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 60: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 61: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 62: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 63: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 64: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 65: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 66: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 67: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 68: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 69: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 70: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 71: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 72: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 73: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 74: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 75: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 76: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 77: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 78: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 79: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 80: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 81: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 82: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 83: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 84: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 85: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 86: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 87: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 88: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 89: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 90: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 91: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 92: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 93: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 94: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 95: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus
Page 96: City Council Agenda Item Report - Granicus