citizen input may 13, 2020 regular meeting...agenda item: 07.05 – contract – real estate...

Citizen Input

May 13, 2020 Regular Meeting

The following document contains all citizen input received for the May 13, 2020 Regular Meeting, as

submitted via the online comment form located at https://www.talgov.com/citizeninput

Compiled by the Office of the City Treasurer-Clerk

https://www.talgov.com/citizeninput

Table of Contents

7.05 – Contract – Real Estate contract broker services (Weems Rd. parcel)

11.02 - Inclusionary Housing Agreement – Canopy PUD

11.04 – Sale of 0.25-acre parcel to Community Leadership Academy (Evening Rose PUD)

11.07 - COVID-19 Update

13.02 - Second Amended and Restated Canopy Development Agreement

13.03 - Ordinance 20-Z-04AA - Canopy PUD Amendment (Boat Storage Site)

7.05 – Contract – Real Estate contract broker services (Weems Rd. parcel)

Page 001

Citizen Information Full First and Last Name: Max Epstein

Home Street Address: 1001 San Luis Rd

Agenda Item Information City Commission Meeting Date: May 13, 2020

Agenda Item: 07.05 – Contract – Real Estate contract broker services (Weems Rd. parcel)

Statement: Commissioners, Please do not sell this beautiful property that is filled with mature live oak trees. This parcel, and other nearby undeveloped land serve an important purpose to the health of citizens and maintain our award‐winning drinking water supply. This area drains directly into the Upper Lake Lafayette basin. Furthermore, it is my understanding this parcel was planned to be a recreational area. Please follow through and turn this area into a park for people to enjoy. Sincerely, Max Epstein

Page 002

Citizen Information Full First and Last Name: Sarah Cawthon

Home Street Address: 921 CARRAWAY ST



Statement: Please, please, please do NOT sell nearly 4 acres of mature live oaks along the Weems Road extension. As my elected representatives, please keep this area and turn it into another of our beautiful parks. The live oaks are priceless!

Page 003

Citizen Information Full First and Last Name: Sandra Mountain

Home Street Address: 3592 Sedona Loop



Statement: Please preserve the mature live oaks in this area along the Weems Road extension and turn it into a park. This will help mitigate runoff that can contaminate our drinking water. Thank you.

Page 004

Citizen Information Full First and Last Name: Larry Teich

Home Street Address: 2224 Pontiac Dr.



Statement: I object to selling this parcel for business development. Please preserve this natural area for

public use.

Page 005

Citizen Information Full First and Last Name: Greg Ivey

Home Street Address: 2553 Panther Creek Road



Statement: In regards to the possible sale and development of the land adjacent to Academy Sports on Mahan: Traffic on Mahan is already absurd at times. Adding more shopping centers in this area will only make it worse. A park or simply leaving the land as it is would be a much better idea considering the new Weems Road extension has already destroyed quite a bit of the woods left in the area.

Page 006

Citizen Information Full First and Last Name: Joyce Hughes

Home Street Address: 830 E Park Ave, 1011



Statement: This is environmentally sensitive area that feeds into Lake Lafayette. This should no be sold but kept as a park until an independent environmental impact impactstudy can be completed.

Page 007

Citizen Information Full First and Last Name: James Bellflower

Home Street Address: 2148 Orleans Drive Tallahassee Florida



Statement: Please do not develop this into a commercial property. Please save the landmark trees and convert this into a park for all residents of Tallahassee to recreate and enjoy. Thank you for your consideration.

Page 008

Citizen Information Full First and Last Name: Jennifer Veal

Home Street Address: 1200 Pedrick Rd



Statement: Please keep this a natural area or perhaps use it as a park. We don’t need anymore construction.

Thank you

Page 009

Citizen Information Full First and Last Name: John Goodson

Home Street Address: 6050 Plow Trail



Statement: This was supposed to be used as a park or for recreation. We do not need another McDonald's, car lot or Pizza Hut. Stop rolling over for developers and leave some greenspace. It is getting ridiculous.

Page 010

Citizen Information Full First and Last Name: Sudi

Home Street Address: 1002 Carrin Dr



Statement: Please consider not selling this property to be used for development. This property contains wetlands and beautiful live oaks. The future of Tallahassee depends on its environmental contributions more than adding yet another development on the NE side of town. A park for conservation land would benefit citizens in Tallahassee, more than filling a developer's pockets. Please do the right thing, make a plan to save Tallahassee's environment now and into the future. Thanks.

Page 011

Citizen Information Full First and Last Name: Veronika Protasevich

Home Street Address: 1311 Tom Still Rd



Statement: Now more than ever we need to preserve the trees. We have more than enougg development already. Turn this land into a park or just let it be.

Page 012

Citizen Information Full First and Last Name: Sine Murray

Home Street Address: 2015 Seminole Dr.



Statement: Honorable Commissioners, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the sale of this publicly owned property. My understanding form the original plan for the Weems Rd. extension was that this area was to be dedicated to passive green space and thus preserving the mature and distinctive trees on site. The adjacent neighborhood has already been negatively impacted by the Weems Rd. extension and any proposed development of the property would have a negative impact on the water quality of Upper Lake Lafayette. I urge you to protect this portion Tallahassee’s distinctive urban forest canopy, a increasingly rare and valuable public asset. Keep this property in public ownership. DO NOT SELL. Respectfully, Sine Murray.

Page 013

Citizen Information Full First and Last Name: Serenna Lammers

Home Street Address: 3164 Lakeshore Dr



Statement: This parcel should not be sold. This geographic area with it's natural drainage and mature oaks is better off as a park. As climate change is making Tallahassee more dry and hot, areas like this one should be kept to combate the heat and retain moisture for the livibility of this city

Page 014

Citizen Information Full First and Last Name: Kelly S Chavers

Home Street Address: 1637 Lake Ella Drive



Statement: Pleaes leave this parcel as oak trees as the current infrastructure can support a park, but not yet another shopping center and there's plenty of retail in this area already.

Page 015

Citizen Information Full First and Last Name: Helen Parker

Home Street Address: 3499 Daylily Lane



Statement: As a resident who lives in the area near Weems road, please DO NOT sell the 4 acres of mature live oaks along the Weems Road extension. It will only add to the already horrible traffic and hurt the environment. Please keep this area and turn it into a park and leave our gorgeous live oaks alone!

Page 016

Citizen Information Full First and Last Name: Donna Meredith

Home Street Address: 6508 Saylers Creek Rd.



Statement: Please save the live oaks! This Weems Road land could be turned into a

greenspace and park.

Page 017

Citizen Information Full First and Last Name: Julie Collins

Home Street Address: 1806 Gibbs Drive



Statement: Please consider siting a park on this parcel. There is ample commercial in the area and there might be a partnership for recreation with nearby Academy Sports.

Page 018

Citizen Information Full First and Last Name: Jean Hewitt

Home Street Address: 3092 Hawks Landing Dr


Agenda Item: 07.05 – Contract – Real Estate contract broker services (Weems

Rd. parcel) Statement: Make it a park! Do not develop.

Page 019

Citizen Information Full First and Last Name: Claude Kenneson

Home Street Address: 1323 N.M.L.King Jr. Blvd Tallahassee, Florida 32303



Statement: Please turn this area into a park and give nature some respite instead of turning it into a concrete jungle. Thanks. Claude Kenneson

Page 020

Citizen Information Full First and Last Name: Edith Gibbs

Home Street Address: 3058 Obrien Drive



Statement: Please turn the 4 acres into a park leaving as many trees as possible. Trees are one of the reasons Tallahassee is so special!

Page 021

Citizen Information Full First and Last Name: Kelly McGrath

Home Street Address: 9601 Miccosukee Road, Lot 41



Statement: I’m requesting the City preserve the heritage oaks on the Weems extension and create a

small park.

Page 022

Citizen Information Full First and Last Name: Denise Hill

Home Street Address: 927 Poser Court



Statement: When will you discontinue desolating our environment? How aepre the developers involved inthis project going to contribute to you? Can't think of any other reason to do this for long term good of citizens of city and county.

Page 023

Citizen Information Full First and Last Name: Crista Hosmer

Home Street Address: 1408 Milton Street Tallahassee 32303



Statement: Please keep the property and turn it into a park. This city has lost too many trees due to development. We will lose our character and identity as Tallahassee if we forsake our reputation as a nature ‐loving city. We don’t want to turn into another concrete jungle like Orlando.

Page 024

Citizen Information Full First and Last Name: Robin Mcdougall

Home Street Address: 3752 Windrose Trail



Statement: Dear Commissioners Our green spaces are our identity in the beautiful City of Tallahassee. Please do not sell of land that belongs to us and allow the space to be denuded and developed. It seems unnecessary, at best. An area like this one serves to slow and absorb runoff, improve our environment, keep our character as a city and create a space for families and community to gather and enjoy our unique character. Please keep this land. Make it into a park. Add it to our trail system. Beautify it. Take care of our city and our future. Sincerely Robin McDougall

Page 025

Citizen Information Full First and Last Name: Kelly McGrath

Home Street Address: 9601 Miccosukee Road, Lot 41



Statement: I’m requesting the City preserve the heritage oaks on the Weems extension and create a

small park.

Page 026

Citizen Information Full First and Last Name: Tammy Brennan

Home Street Address: 1109 ROSEWOOD DR



Statement: Please consider turning this into a recreational area for people to come and relax. Do we really need more strip plazas, hotels, car washes etc. that will go out of business sooner than later leaving empty concrete? Take a look around town. You see it everywhere. Money is the driving factor and it shows in this city. Maybe, you could buck the trend and do something the people would really like and enjoy for a change. Do it for us. Do it for the environment.

Page 027

Citizen Information Full First and Last Name: Dolores Bush

Home Street Address: 5032 Butterfly Hill Lane



Statement: We need to save our natural habitats and stop paving over them. Loosing this parcel will affect runoff and harm wildlife.

Page 028

Citizen Information Full First and Last Name: Bill Wilson

Home Street Address: 1816 Old Fort Dr



Statement: The City is required to review all surplus property and identify any parcels that are suitable for affordable housing before putting them up for sale. I don’t understand how this parcel was not identified as suitable for affordable housing. This would be an ideal site for a multi‐family affordable development. The rating criteria that Florida Housing uses in reviewing sites include things such as: • access to public transportation – this is on one bus route and a quarter mile from another • access to food – there are multiple options for food shopping within walking distance of the site and well as multiple eating establishments • access to medical care – there is a hospital within 1.2 miles, doctor’s offices in less than a mile and pharmacies within walking distance • access to shopping – there are multiple shopping options within a half mile of the site • access to major transportation arteries – this is on a major connector Another consideration in selecting a site for an affordable housing development is access to jobs for the tenants. There are a numerous job opportunities within walking distance of this site. While there has been tremendous activity in multi‐family development in the last few years those have been market rate rentals. Affordable rental housing requires local government assistance. Your policies do not require multi‐family development to include affordable units, even when supported by local dollars. As a result there is a tremendous shortage of affordable rental units in Tallahassee. Working with a successful affordable multi‐family developer we have a plan for an affordable housing development of 100 units with a mix of 1, 2 and 3 bedroom units in three story buildings with surface parking. Our development partner has years of experience in the development of multi‐family affordable housing developments and we would be interested in this as a site for our development. We will not be able to compete with private sector bidders in a competitive process and acquire this land at a price that will make the development work financially. Making surplus land owned by local government available for affordable housing is one way to make affordable housing deal work. That is the reason for the requirements in State law. You put over $1.3 million dollars in a 100 unit development for the Tallahassee Housing Authority. That was needed to make the deal work on land that the Housing Authority already owns. How about putting this land, as your local contribution, in a 100 unit affordable development with us? This site is the perfect size for such a development and will include nice open space if the City accepts the site’s storm water in the new holding pond and a large portion of the site is not needed for a storm water facility. The site has all City utility services available which would allow for the maximum use of gas reducing the utility costs for the low income residents. I recommend that you reevaluate this

Page 029

Citizen Information Full First and Last Name: Julie Hauserman

Home Street Address: 9516 Sunhawk Blvd



Statement: HI, I am a nearby resident who just learned that the city is planning to sell this parcel. I have seen wildlife ‐ especially our rare wood storks ‐ using this area for many years. Also, considering it's hydrological connections to our aquifer, I believe that it would be prudent for the city to hold onto this parcel to mitigate the impacts of the very intensive development in the area. I oppose selling this parcel and believe it would be a mistake that we will later regret. I am sorry that the present circumstances of the pandemic prevent me from testifying in person, but hope that you will consider my comments and others in making your decision. Thank you.

Page 030

11.02 – Inclusionary Housing Agreement – Canopy PUD

Page 031

Citizen Information Full First and Last Name: Deb Burr

Home Street Address: 1217 Leewood Hollow


Agenda Item: 11.02 – Inclusionary Housing Agreement – Canopy PUD

Statement: This agenda item warrants delay indefinitely until in‐person public can occur. As a public employee who also has to conduct meetings via internet platforms such as GoToMeeting, we makes sure not to include anything that is highly controversial on the agenda. That is because virtual meetings have inherent limitations to public participation in the process. I understand the need to conduct regular business, but this item if approved will result in significant impact to Tallahassee and residents deserve to speak in‐person on the record at a public meeting. Complete transparency and full public participation are the most important things we must uphold as public servants! Therefore I beg you to delay this agenda item for a future in person meeting.

Page 032

Citizen Information Full First and Last Name: Stephen N Martin

Home Street Address: 2625 Stonegate Drive



Statement: As I have noted at prior meetings, traffic was, at times, already a problem in this area and has increased significantly due to this development. The City’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance grants a 25% increase in allowable density. This amendment will only add to an already existing problem with traffic. If more affordable housing is your true objective, there are means of attainment which do not entail increased housing density and traffic: reduce the sales price of residential units and the profit for the developers. Do I believe more affordable housing is a primary objective of this developer? No, I do not. I do believe, however, it is exploited by the developer to gain support for more dense development (and ultimately added financial gain). This developer relies on tactics long used by developers to win over support for otherwise controversial developments, including becoming friends with and/or ingratiating local, often elected, officials, key decision makers in the permitting process. This includes members of the City Commission, County Commission, and Planning Commission. During the current City Commission’s initial meetings, some citizens expressed optimism that the Commission would be entering a new phase with several fresh faces. I, on the other hand, was not optimistic about change. Three out of five of you (a majority) had already been involved in the process for some time: one had already been serving on the City Commission and had been on the Blue Print Citizen Committee, another one had long served on the County Commission, and another one had served on the Planning Commission. All three of you had already partaken in key decisions involving controversial projects of this developer. All three of you had shown support for this developer despite strong opposition expressed by concerned constituents and/or area residents. Based on what I have observed in commission meetings and/or have read in public records or local media reports, there is reason to suspect that personal ties have influenced your decision‐making. At the very least, there is an appearance of a conflict of interest for some (a majority) of you due to pre‐existing relationships with this developer and/or associates of the developer. One of you has, on occasion, noted “indigenous rights” of those already in areas prior to development. You specifically mentioned “indigenous rights” of residents of French Town as well as those along Springhill Road when proposed developments in and around those sites were under consideration. Yet, when those rights were brought up on behalf of neighborhoods already impacted and/or potentially impacted by this developer (Woodhaven by Sandco Mining, and Centerville Road by Canopy), you totally ignored the “indigenous rights” of these neighborhoods. I was surprised someone so outspoken about ‘indigenous rights’ in French Town and along Springhill Road could be so neglectful of those same rights in these other cases until I became aware of th

Page 033

Citizen Information Full First and Last Name: Sandra Mountain

Home Street Address: 3592 Sedona Loop



Statement: Please follow the county commission and delay any amendments to the Canopy development until full public comment is possible.

Page 034

Citizen Information Full First and Last Name: Bill Wilson

Home Street Address: 1816 Old Fort Dr



Statement: Greetings This agenda item recommends the following changes to the Canopy inclusionary unit agreement. All of these are reasonable modifications and will provide clarity around some issues that have surfaced in the process of building and selling these units. I support you making these changes. ‐ increase number of inclusionary units (to 67) reflecting revisions to PUD, ‐ reflect relocation of certain inclusionary units, ‐ provide for payment of realtor fees from sales price (to be paid by developer), ‐ provide for payment of 3% of buyer's closing costs (to be paid by developer), ‐ provide for annual adjustments to sales price controls, ‐ increase pool of eligible buyers (households up to 100% of area median income), ‐ restart clock for City to purchase unsold inclusionary units, and ‐ eliminate posting of bond There is, however, one major changes to the agreement that is not included in this list and not mentioned in the agenda item at all. I believe it represents the largest policy change represented by this modification and it seems strange that it was not included in the narrative of the agenda item. During the presentation of the original agreement, the proposed term for the units to remain affordable would be 10 years (the minimum required by your policy). We suggested at that time that the term should be perpetuity. The primary goal of inclusionary zoning is to provide for economic diversity in the new development. We all know that Tallahassee is a very economically segregated city. Inclusionary zoning is one tool to address this issue. If you create affordable units those units need to remain affordable in order to continue to have economic diversity. Removing the affordable restrictions and allowing the units to revert to being market rate housing only exacerbates the economic segregation. During that Commission meeting, the developer agreed to increase the restriction period to 15 years. While that only kicks the can down the road a few more years it was better that the ten years proposed by City staff. This agreement now proposes to reduce the restriction period to seven years, which is below the minimum called for in the Inclusionary Zoning Policy. The general argument for reducing the restrictions is that it makes the units easier to sale. These are quality houses in an attractive development. For the target market, families with household income at or below the average in the community, they are getting a home at a price they cannot otherwise afford. These homes are a stepping stone to a full market rate house. With the limit on the sales price and the thousands of dollars in closing costs and additional down payment assistance this is a very attractive package. The other issues addressed in this new agreement – marketing efforts, commissions to realtors, etc. will assist on the sales side. Having relators who understand the affordable market working to sale these units with the new commission structure

Page 035

Citizen Information Full First and Last Name: Peter Boulware

Home Street Address: 7006 Meander CT



Statement: Thank you for your willingness to help Community Leadership Academy. We are a nonprofit school serving the children of this area. We need your help as we try to keep our children safe. A multi family housing project right beside our building would put our children at significant risk. The extra traffic and people would be a nightmare for our school and our children. We are so afraid that one of our precious two or three year old children could easily be hit or God forbid be killed by traffic through our campus. Please consider the safety of our children today. Thank you for your willingness to keep our children safe. Peter Boulware

Page 036

11.04 – Sale of 0.25-acre parcel to Community Leadership Academy (Evening Rose PUD)

Page 037

Citizen Information Full First and Last Name: Fae Wilkes

Home Street Address: 1820 Jean Ave


Agenda Item: 11.04 – Sale of 0.25‐acre parcel to Community Leadership Academy (Evening

Rose PUD) Statement: Please keep this parcel as a green space/park as originally decided.

Page 038

11.07 - COVID-19 Update

Page 039

Citizen Information Full First and Last Name: Amber R. Tynan

Home Street Address: 2477 Tim Gamble Place, Tallahassee, FL 32308


Agenda Item: 11.07 – COVID‐19 update \ re‐opening plans

Statement: Mayor and Commissioners, on behalf of United Partners for Human Services and our member agencies ‐ thank you so much for your support of the $1M in Blueprint funding for nonprofits (Local Emergency Assistance for Nonprofits ‐ LEAN grant) in the wake of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Because participation in this program has been slower than anticipated and has yet to meet program capacity, we have been working with our sector partners (COCA and INIE) alongside OEV to better understand the barriers that have prevented nonprofit agencies from applying. The biggest area to note is that many nonprofits have not yet experienced a 25% decrease in revenue, however losses of this amount are anticipated through FY2020 (just not yet realized). Additionally, nonprofits have generally seen an increase in COVID‐specific expenses but this was not originally considered as part of the criteria. With this knowledge, OEV made some modifications to the criteria on May 5th and we would respectfully request consideration at the May 21st IA/Blueprint Meeting to maintain the funding for nonprofits and extend the deadline through June 1st to ensure all eligible nonprofits have the ability to apply. We have been and will continue to make phone calls to our member agencies regarding this funding opportunity, as well as, provide technical assistance as needed. This additional time will help us and our partners ensure local nonprofits gain access to this critical funding in such an uncertain and unknown time. We appreciate your consideration and your continued leadership during this trying time for our community.

Page 040

13.02 - Second Amended and Restated Canopy Development Agreement

Page 041




Agenda Item: 13.02 – Public Hearing ‐ Second Amended and Restated Canopy Development Agreement

Statement: Last month at the first public hearing on this agreement, Commissioner Richardson (whose ties with the developer I spoke of earlier) motioned immediately for acceptance of the agreement despite the fact a second public hearing was scheduled. Decisions are supposed to be reached after all public hearings have been held and all concerns of citizens have been taken into account. I question whether the Commissioner intended to consider any public input or expressions of concern. As noted earlier, the Commissioner seems to ignore public concerns expressed about this developer. But Commissioner Richardson is not the only one of you who has shown support for this developer despite strong public opposition. Last August, I read in the Tallahassee Democrat that one of you had in October 2018, while running for City Commission, received 19 maximum campaign donations totaling $4750 from companies all at the same address as Ghazvini‐Asbury, LTD, the developer of Canopy. This was the same one of you who had served on the Planning Commission prior to the City Commission. You served on the Planning Commission with a key player, Tim Edmond, in the development of Canopy. Mr. Edmond has been heavily involved with the development for some time. In 2010 and 2011, he lobbied the City Commission for approval of the development. While on the Planning Commission, Mr. Edmond also served as a member of the Canopy Community Development District. It is no secret that members of governmental committees (like Planning Commissions) often court favors from one another. Developers have long been known to seek appointments on committees which will address and make key decisions involving their developments. Even if the developers recuse themselves when voting on those particular items, they often court favorable votes from fellow committee members. I attended Planning Commission meetings when you were a member and items related to this developer were addressed. Despite several serious concerns and strong opposition expressed by the public about anticipated impacts of proposed developments, never once did you question a proposed development. On every occasion, you supported this developer’s request. Another individual who was quite involved with Canopy and the development of Welaunee Plantation is Debbie Lightsey, who was on this City Commission for 20‐plus years during which several special measures were taken on behalf of the Plantation owners, whom she knew before her term on the Commission. Ms. Lightsey has long‐standing ties, as well, with these developers. Not surprisingly, at your first City Commission meeting, you (the former Planning Commissioner) mentioned Ms. Lightsey as one of your key environmental advisors (she was the first name you mentioned). I was not at all surprised, and what I have observed since then from you on this Commission further confirms my beliefs about your lack of an environmental ethic (much like Ms. Lightsey and the developers).

Page 042

13.03 - Ordinance 20-Z-04AA - Canopy PUD Amendment (Boat Storage Site)

Page 043




Agenda Item: 13.03 – Public Hearing –Ordinance 20‐Z‐04AA ‐ Canopy PUD Amendment (Boat Storage Site)

Statement: As noted in the last agenda item, Tim Edmond was appointed to the Planning Commission despite having major ties to Canopy development and the developers. Several related items were presented to the Planning Commission during his term. But on his application, he specifically noted that he did not foresee any conflicts of interest. Yet he had to recuse himself from several votes due to conflicts of interest. These conflicts could have readily been anticipated before he submitted his application. Had he noted the conflicts, I was told that he would, in all likelihood, not have been appointed. But he chose not to disclose those conflicts until some time later when they were brought forth by a member of the public. Soon after this, he did step down from the Commission. But after revising his application and listing potential conflicts of interest (Sandco Mining and Premier Builders, both of which are owned by Canopy’s developer), Mr. Edmond was reappointed to the Planning Commission. I specifically addressed these conflicts of interest with one of you, the same one of you who had originally nominated Mr. Edmond to his first term on the Planning Commission and then voted for his reappointment (after I had pointed out to you his failure to include the conflicts in his original application). Earlier this year in the Tallahassee Democrat, I read an article entitled “The Man Behind The Curtain”, referring to Drew Jones with VancoreJones Communications. I learned about long‐standing ties between you and Mr. Jones, another key party involved with Canopy development. I read that the firm’s clients include Ghazvini‐backed businesses as well as CNL and Hopping Green & Sams, both of which have been heavily involved in the Canopy development. “Jones has helped longtime clients the Ghazvini family and Premier Homes navigate approvals for its Canopy development.” Despite several violations and restrictions for further development being implemented, I read that Mr. Jones has been able to help in getting permits and “ in getting things moving along.” As noted earlier, there is definitely at the very least an appearance of conflicts in interest for some (three out of five of you, a majority) on issues related to Canopy development and/or the developers and their associates. I do wish that I could have presented my case face‐to‐face directly with you as well as the developer. This has been a very frustrating experience the past twelve years as I have closely followed the development of Welaunee Plantation. As someone who cared deeply about the land and is very concerned about the impacts of the development on the surrounding area, I am asking that each of you consider the well‐being of all impacted parties and not just the interests of the developers and their associates. Thank you for your time.

Page 044

citizen input may 13, 2020 regular meeting...agenda item: 07.05 – contract – real estate...

Documents