ci260 syllabus fall2014 tentative(1)

Upload: wjullrich

Post on 13-Apr-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 CI260 Syllabus Fall2014 Tentative(1)

    1/15

    1

    CI260, Ullrich, Fall 2014

    COURSE DESCRIPTION

    CI260: Critical Pedagogy is built around a variety of themes involving education,

    academic achievement, and equity. First, the failure to attend to questions of

    purpose is a significant concern of teachers who work within this tradition. Asking

    what schools currently do for children and for what purposes, as well as exploring

    what schools might do differently and why, is central to MSJE (or equityoriented)

    teachers. A second theme is that there is an integral relationship between education

    and the broader society. Since the United States is an increasingly diverse, multi-

    cultural society where educational policy and practices are deeply embedded,schools and teachers play significant social and political roles. Third, MSJE (or

    equity-oriented) teachers provide a vision for the ultimate purposes of education in

    society, a vision that involves challenging inequity and injustice and building more

    humane schools and society.

    **This course is taken concurrently with CI246: Action Research in the MulticulturalClassroom.

    REQUIRED TEXTS

    Oakes, J., & Lipton, M. (2013). Teaching to change the world (4thEd.). Boulder,CO: Paradigm Publishers.

    RECOMMENDED TEXTS

    Au, W. (Ed.). (2014). Rethinking multicultural education: Teaching for racial and

    cultural justice (2ndEd.)." Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools

    Email:[email protected] Work Phone: (559) [email protected] (559) 646-2731

    CI 260Critical Pedagogy

    FALL 2014, 4 UNITS

    Instructors: Dr. Walter J. Ullrich

    Samuel Martinez

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 7/27/2019 CI260 Syllabus Fall2014 Tentative(1)

    2/15

    2

    CI260, Ullrich, Fall 2014

    Christenson, L. (Ed.). (2009). Teaching for joy and justice: Re-imagining the language

    arts classroom. Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools.

    Grant, G. A., & Sleeter, C.A. (2009). Turning on learning: Five approaches for

    multicultural teaching plans for race, class, gender, and disability (any recentedition).

    Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

    Gutstein, E., & Peterson, B. (Eds.). (2014). Rethinking mathematics: Teaching socialjustice by the numbers (2nd. Ed.). Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools.

    COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES

    1.Students will explain and produce multicultural, social justice curriculum,

    instruction, assessment and classroom management strategies, position

    papers, etc. with respect to MSJE theory, models and principles.

    2.Students will provide evidence of connections between curriculum, instruction,

    assessment and classroom management to the understandings, perspectives,

    identities and cultures the school is designed to serve.

    3.Students will ensure that subject matter as defined by the state standards is

    comprehensible to all of their pupils. Special attention is paid to culturally-and

    developmentally-responsive curriculum and pedagogy, special education

    students, and English Language Learner students.

    4. Students will design and present electronically MSJE and/or bilingual education

    position papers, action research activities, lessons, and/or curriculum unit

    using a backward design planning process.

    REQUIREMENTS

    Below are brief descriptions of the requirements for this class. Each requirement is relatedto important learning outcomes. More details on each of these assignments will be

    provided during the course through Announcements, Unit Folders, etc. on Blackboard.

    Discussion Board (1/2 of your final grade):

    Requirements for each of the Discussion Board collegial interactions (we will work insmall collaborative groups) will be posted for each of your 1-week, Sunday-morning-through-Saturday-night Units. Due dates are important for these postings so that

    collegial

    interaction will occur. Your first posting should occur on or before midnightThursday and a critique of a classmatespost or integration of the insights of your group

    insights on or before midnight Saturday. In short, there is a minimum of two postingsper discussion board prompt one original posting and oneposting responding to a

  • 7/27/2019 CI260 Syllabus Fall2014 Tentative(1)

    3/15

    3

    CI260, Ullrich, Fall 2014

    colleague or group . Discussion postings should reflect higher order thinking (analysis /

    synthesis / evaluation/creativity). Responses to classmates should go beyond simple

    agreement to add insight, ask for clarification, or respectfully and professionally, challengethinking. These posts will be graded togetherI will average the scores on your Thursday

    post and Saturday critique/integration - according to the scoring rubric below.

    For those of you in the MAT, the Comprehensive Examination will be primarily basedon thequestions you are responding to each week in CI 260 as well as those in the CI

    246. In short, even though the Comprehensive Examination for this program is an open

    book, open Blackboard exam, the basic material you will be responding in short essays for

    the time specific option or longer essays in the take home option to is distilled in your work

    in CI 260 and CI 246. I highly recommend you use the Journal tool to keep notes on the

    readings you are integrating into your posts as this will be a good place to review for

    your Comprehensive Exam.*

    PICK ONE OF THE FOLLOWING FOR THE SECOND MAJOR REQUIREMENT:

    Assignments (1/2 of your final grade):

    There will be a series of three (3) Assignments (e.g., chapter/article critiques, positionpapers, action research activities, website critiques, etc.) based in the required readings overthe semester. These are referred to as Multicultural, Social Justice Education (MSJE)Assignments. The basic requirements for each of these 4-6 page Assignments are

    as follows:

    Tie the content in the particular Unit under study directly to your teaching,

    curriculum, assessing, connecting with parents and the community, etc.

    explaining carefully how this content (#1 Foundations of MSJE; #2 Practice ofMSJE Teaching; #3 Context of MSJE Teaching) affects your classroom, school,

    and/or community;

    APA formatting (see previous link), including title page and short reference

    section;

    A minimum of 3 primary or secondary sources in required and recommended

    texts and specific chapters in CI260 and texts from CI240, ERA 243, CI241,

    CI245, and CI246;

    The three basic areas of the written assignments are as follows:

    1. Foundations of American Schooling: Democracy, Diversity, InequalitySection I

    2.

    Practice of Teaching to Change the World Section II3. Context of Teaching to Change the World Section III

    OR:

    Multicultural, Social Justice or Bilingual Education Curriculum Unit (1/2 of your

    final grade):

    Design and implement a MSJE and/or bilingual education curriculum unit during the first

    2/3 of the course and present significant classroom snapshots of it electronically by theend

  • 7/27/2019 CI260 Syllabus Fall2014 Tentative(1)

    4/15

    4

    CI260, Ullrich, Fall 2014

    of the course. Design a curriculum unit that you can actually teach and that uses various

    elements of multicultural curriculum design that you have been working on overthe courseof the MAT program. In addition to using these elements, the written document you turn in

    should include the following components:

    A short philosophy statement giving a rationale for why this content is worth

    teaching, connecting the unit to ideas from this course and the program. What is

    the ideology or set of beliefs and ideas that ground the unit? A brief description of who the unit is for-what students are you planning the unit

    for, and anything you know about them that that would be pertinent to yourplanning? (If you interviewed them, include information about what you learned

    that is relevant.)

    Learning outcomes or objectives for the unit. What should students be able to do,

    or gain, as a result of the unit? How will you assess the extent to which studentshave learned what you intend?

    A description of the materials and if possible, copies of materials (such as

    handouts) or title of books. Specific descriptions of teaching procedures. Dontleave things up to my

    imagination! By the end of the semester, produce a short digitized video that capturessignificant

    portions of your MSJE or bilingual education unit. Use the videosnapshots from

    the Social Justice Videos, Hunter College, City University of New York as a modelof the strengths of your unit. Make it clear how you are using

    the material you are

    reading and discussing or Assignments in CI260.

    **A rough draft of the unit theme or topic, rationale, and student learning outcomeswill be due via Assignments the fourth week of the course (Sept 24). Outlines of the

    lessons themselves will be due via Assignments Nov. 5th

    . Continue implementing theunit and present video snapshots and final write-up of the unit by December 6th.

    GRADING POLICY

    Assignment Points Available

    DB Posts/Critiques 12 @ 10 points 120

    Multicultural, Social Justice Papers 3 @ 40 points

    ORMSJE Curriculum Unit/Presentation

    120

    Total 240

  • 7/27/2019 CI260 Syllabus Fall2014 Tentative(1)

    5/15

    5

    CI260, Ullrich, Fall 2014

    GRADING SCALE

    Letter Grade & of Total

    Points Earned

    A 90 100%

    B 80 89%

    C 70 79%

    D 60 69%

    F < 69%

    SCORING RUBRIC

    Interacting Substantively and Succinctly with Resources to RefineMSJE

    Approach, Model, Theory

    Resources to Refine MSJE A roach PointsOriginality (2 Points for Thursday/Saturday Posts; 8 for Assignments or

    Parts of MSJE

    Unit)

    Highlights and amplifies particular ideas in the reading(s); not a meresummary

    Creative use of ideas when analyzing, reflecting on, critiquing the

    reading(s) and its usefulness for teaching for equity, achievement and

    social justice

    Critiques the Reading(s) and other Program Material (2 Points for

    Thursday/Saturday posts; 12 for Assignments or parts of MSJE Unit) Reflects on the core ideas of the readings as the main sources for

    critiquing its usefulness for teaching for equity, achievement, and social

    justice.

    Reflects on previous schooling/teaching experiences, current

    schooling/teaching experiences, program or other relevant readings,

    responses of colleagues in program, school and/or community, etc. incritique

    Depth of Thought & Analysis (2 Points for Thursday/Saturday posts;

    12 for

    Assignments or parts of MSJE Unit)

    Carries the ideas of the reading further or adapt the idea in a classroom

    setting or other possible classroom contexts

    Makes connections to other ideas or theories.

    Maintains complex discussion without repetition, etc.

    Significance or Importance of the Information in this Critique (2

    Points for Thursday/Saturday Posts; 8 for Assignments or Parts of

    MSJE

    Unit)

    Ideas presented in such a way(s) that they will lead to classroom

    application. Looks beyond potential obstacles, missed or failed attempts, etc. to

    envision how to improve the classroom activity consistent with the major

    ideas in this and other related reading.

    Thoughts consistent with promoting greater equity, achievement, social

    justice, higher quality or quantity of learning, etc.

    Total

  • 7/27/2019 CI260 Syllabus Fall2014 Tentative(1)

    6/15

    6

    CI260, Ullrich, Fall 2014

    TENTATIVE COURSE SCHEDULE

    Unit Topics Reading and Assignments

    Unit 1

    Aug. 21-30

    Course Overview

    Foundations of

    American

    Schooling:Democracy,

    Diversity, and

    Inequality

    Review syllabus, MSJE units, videos, and actionresearch studies

    Reading:

    Oakes & Lipton: TheAmerican Schooling

    Dilemma: Diversity, Inequality, and Democratic

    Values

    DB Post and Integrated Critique:

    Thursday & Saturday

    Unit 2

    Aug. 31-

    Sept. 6

    Foundations of

    American

    Schooling:

    Democracy,

    Diversity, and

    Inequality

    Reading:

    Oakes & Lipton: Historyand Culture: How

    Expanding Expectations and Powerful

    Ideologies Shape Schooling in the United States

    DB Post and Critique: Thursday and Saturday

    Unit 3

    Sept. 7-13

    Foundations of

    AmericanSchooling:

    Democracy,

    Diversity, and

    Inequality

    Reading:

    Oakes & Lipton,Politics and Philosophy:

    TheStruggle over the American Curriculum

    DB Post and Critique: Thursday and Saturday

    Integrated

    Assignment

    Sept. 14-20

    Foundations of

    American

    Schooling:

    # 1 Assignment due Sept. 20

  • 7/27/2019 CI260 Syllabus Fall2014 Tentative(1)

    7/15

    7

    CI260, Ullrich, Fall 2014

    Unit Topics Reading and Assignments

    Unit 4

    Sept. 21-

    27

    Practice of

    Teaching to

    Change the

    World

    Reading:

    Oakes & Lipton, TheSubject Matters:

    Constructing Knowledge Across the Content

    Areas

    Recommend: Darling-Hammond, LearningClassroom pdf and videos.

    DB Post and Critique: Thursday and Saturday

    Unit 5

    Sept. 28-

    Oct. 4

    Practice of

    Teaching to

    Change the

    World

    Reading:

    Oakes & Lipton, Instruction:Teaching and

    Learning Across the Content Areas

    Recommend: Darling-Hammond, Learning

    Classroom pdf and videos.

    DB Post and Critique: Thursday and Saturday

    Unit 6

    Oct. 5-11Practice of

    Teaching toChange the

    World

    Reading:

    Oakes & Lipton,Assessment:Measuring that

    Matters

    Recommend: Darling-Hammond, LearningClassroom pdf and videos.

    DB Post and Critique: Thursday and Saturday

    Unit 7Oct. 12-18

    Practice of

    Teaching to

    Change the

    World

    Reading:

    Oakes & Lipton, Classrooms as Communities:Developing Caring and Democratic

    Relationships

    Recommend: Darling-Hammond, Learning

    Classroom pdf and videos

    DB Post and Critique: Thursday and Saturday

  • 7/27/2019 CI260 Syllabus Fall2014 Tentative(1)

    8/15

    8

    CI260, Ullrich, Fall 2014

    Unit Topics Reading and Assignments

    Integrated

    Assignment

    Oct. 19-25

    Practice

    of

    Teaching

    toChange

    theWorld

    #2 Assignment due Oct. 25

    Unit 8

    Oct. 26-

    Nov. 1

    Context

    of

    Teaching

    toChange

    theWorld

    Reading:

    Oakes & Lipton, TheSchool Culture: Where Good

    Teaching Makes Sense

    DB Post and Critique: Thursday and Saturday

    Unit 9

    Nov. 2-8Context

    of

    TeachingtoChange

    theWorld

    Reading:

    Oakes & Lipton,School Structure: Sorting

    Students and Opportunities to Learn

    DB Post and Critique: Thursday and Saturday

    Unit 10

    Nov. 9-15

    Context

    of

    Teaching

    toChange

    theWorld

    Reading:

    Oakes & Lipton, The Community: Engaging

    with Families and Neighborhoods

    DB Post and Critique: Thursday and Saturday

    Unit 11

    Nov. 16-29

    Context

    of

    Teaching

    to Change

    the World

    Reading:

    Oakes & Lipton, Teaching to Change the World: AProfession and a Hopeful Struggle

    DB Post and Critique: Thursday and Saturday

    Unit 10

    Nov. 30-

    Dec. 6

    Context

    of

    Teaching

    to Change

    the World

    #3 Assignment due December 6

  • 7/27/2019 CI260 Syllabus Fall2014 Tentative(1)

    9/15

    9

    CI260, Ullrich, Fall 2014

    Comprehen-

    sive

    Examination

    Final

    Examinat

    ion for

    MAT

    Students

    Final Comprehensive Exam:4-hour, time specific, short essay:

    Saturday morning or afternoon, Dec. 13

    OR5 day take-home, longer essay, Sunday morning,

    Dec. 14-midnight, Thursday, Dec. 18th.

  • 7/27/2019 CI260 Syllabus Fall2014 Tentative(1)

    10/15

    CI260, Ullrich, Fall 2014

    10

    COURSE

    EXPECATIONS

    Communication:

    Check your email and the course Blackboard sitefrequently. Regular updates will

    be posted often. Collaborative assignments require that you post and respond ina timely manner; check group and class discussion boards often when using them

    tocomplete assignments. I am available by email throughout the course at

    [email protected]

    Civility:

    As a diverse community of learners, students must strive to work together in a

    setting of civility, tolerance, and respect for each other and for the instructor.

    Expectations for classroom behavior, which apply equally to on-ground and

    online learning environments, include but are not limited to the following:

    conflicting opinions among members of a class are to be respected and responded

    to in a professional manner. Respond to others in the way that you yourselfwould want tobe addressed.

    Collaboration:

    Collaboration can benefit the learning of all students. For some assignments, you

    will work with your cohort to form a collective response to a question. For others,

    you will provide feedback and critiques to your peers. The level of discourse and

    interaction is essential for this course.

    Professionalism:

    Short-term formative assignments are designed to scaffold your learning and

    enableyou to successfully complete major assignments. The expectation is thatyou will give careful attention to each of these activities even if a reply or post is

    not required.

    Timeliness:

    In a collaborative online environment, it is particularly crucial that all students

    adhere to scheduled deadlines for posting work and/or providing

    critiques/feedback. Failure to submit work in a timely manner, or to provide

    responses and critiques by the scheduled due date, impacts the learning

    opportunities of your peers and will be reflected in your grade for the assignment.

    Late assignments are normally not accepted.

    TECHNOLOGY

    RESOURCES

    The following technology resources will be used during this class.

    Microsoft Office: You are required to use Microsoft Office on your

    computer. For information on campus pricing and purchasing locations, see

    Student Technology Special Programs (http://www.csufresno.edu/ait/ait-

    links.htm#Software)

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.csufresno.edu/ait/ait-http://www.csufresno.edu/ait/ait-http://www.csufresno.edu/ait/ait-http://www.csufresno.edu/ait/ait-mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 7/27/2019 CI260 Syllabus Fall2014 Tentative(1)

    11/15

    CI260, Ullrich, Fall 2014

    11 Adobe Acrobat Reader (Adobe Reader, latest version): Program that

    allows you to readpdf files. It can be downloaded from the following Adobe

    website (http://www.adobe.com)

    Skype: You can download Skype at the following URL:(http://www.skype.com/). We mat use this for collaborative discussions

    during the course.

    SUBMISSION OF ASSIGNMENTSFormat: Word-processed documents must be in a format that can be opened in

    Microsoft Word. If you donthave Word, convert your file to apdf document, which

    preserves both text and formatting. If your word processing program does not have

    apdf option, choose Rich Text Format (RTF), which preserves the text but not the

    formatting. If you have Office 2007 for Windows, there is a compatibility problem

    with Mac OS. Microsoft recommends that you save your documents as a

    Word/Excel/PowerPoint97-2003Document(.doc,.xls, .ppt) to ensure the

    documents can be shared across platforms. If you don not format your assignments

    correctly, then your colleagues and I will not be able to open the documents.

    File Names:Always begin the document name with your last name and firstinitial (all one word), followed by an underscore (_), a short assignment title, the

    date submitted, and the appropriate file extension(e.g., .doc, .ppt). For example,

    Ullrich_Paper1_Oct152010.doc. The critical issue here is for your document to have

    your name and date submitted.

    COURSE POLICY AND SAFETY ISSUES

    Subject to Change: This syllabus and schedule are subject to change in the event of

    extenuating circumstances and any changes will be clearly announced in the course

    to Blackboard regularly to check for announcements and to check your email daily.

    Copyright: You will be provided with digital and/or print materials to support your

    learning in this course. As all of these materials are proprietary in nature, and most

    are protected by copyright, you may not reproduce or retain any of the materials for

    purposes other than class work.

    UNIVERSITY POLICIES

    Policy on Students with Disabilities:

    Upon identifying themselves to the instructor and the university, students with

    disabilities will receive reasonable accommodation for learning and evaluation. Formore information, contact Services to Students with Disabilities at 559-278-2811.

    Policy on Cheating and Plagiarism:

    Cheating is the actual or attempted practice of fraudulent or deceptive acts for the

    purpose of improving one's grade or obtaining course credit; such acts also include

    assisting another student to do so. Typically, such acts occur in relation to

    examinations. However, it is the intent of this definition that the term cheating

    not be limited to examination situations only, but that it include any and all actions

    http://www.skype.com/)http://www.skype.com/)http://www.skype.com/)http://www.skype.com/)http://www.skype.com/)
  • 7/27/2019 CI260 Syllabus Fall2014 Tentative(1)

    12/15

    CI260, Ullrich, Fall 2014

    12by a student that are intended to gain an unearned academic advantage by

    fraudulent ordeceptive means. Plagiarism is a specific form of cheating which

    consists of themisuse of the published and/or unpublished works of others by

    misrepresenting the material (i.e., their intellectual property) so used as one's own

    work. Penalties forcheating and plagiarism range from a 0 or F on a particular

    assignment, through an F for the course, to expulsion from the university. For more

    information on theUniversity's policy regarding cheating and plagiarism, refer to

    the Schedule ofCourses (Legal Notices on Cheating and Plagiarism) or theUniversity Catalog (Policies and Regulations).

    Access to Computer Technology:

    At California State University, Fresno, computers and communications links to

    remote resources are recognized as being integral to the education and research

    experience. Every student is required to have his/her own computer or have other

    personal access to a workstation (including a modem and a printer) with all the

    recommended software. The minimum and recommended standards for the

    workstations and software, which may vary by academic major, are updated

    periodically and are available from Information Technology Services or the

    University Bookstore. In the curriculum and class assignments, students are

    presumed to have 24-houraccess to a computer workstation and the necessary

    communication links to the University's information resources.

    Disruptive Classroom Behavior:

    The classroom, whether virtual or physical, is a special environment in which

    students and faculty come together to promote learning and growth. It is essential to

    this learning environment that respect for the rights of others seeking to learn,

    respect for the professionalism of the instructor, and the general goals of academic

    freedom are maintained.Differencesof viewpoint or concerns should be expressed

    in terms which are supportive of the learning process, creating an environment inwhich students and faculty may learn to reason with clarity and compassion, toshare

    of themselves without losing their identities, and to develop andunderstanding of the

    community in which they live.Studentconduct whichdisrupts the learning process

    shall not be tolerated and may lead to disciplinaryaction and/or removal from the

    class.

    Bibliography

    Apple, M. W. & Beane, J. A. (Eds.). (2007).Democratic schools (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association

    for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Apple, M. W. (1986). Teachers and texts: A political economy of class and gender relations in education.

    New York, NY: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Apple, M. W., Au, W., & Gandin, L. A. (2009). The Routledge international handbook of critical

    education. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Apple, M. W., Ball, S. J., & Gandin, L. A. (2010). The Routledge international handbook of the sociology

    of education. New York, NY: Routledge.

  • 7/27/2019 CI260 Syllabus Fall2014 Tentative(1)

    13/15

    CI260, Ullrich, Fall 2014

    13Banks, J. A. (2006).Race, culture and education.New York, NY: Routledge.

    Beane, J. A. (2005). A reason to teach: Creating classrooms of dignity and hope. Portsmouth, NH:

    Heinemann.

    Beane, J. A. (1997). Curriculum integration: Designing the core of democratic education. New York, NY:

    Teachers College Press.

    Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009).Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation .

    New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Counts, G. S. (1978/1932).Dare the school build a new social order? Carbondale: Southern Illinois

    University Press. (Original work published 1932)

    Creswell, J. W. (2009).Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches.

    Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Delgado-Gaitan, C. (1991) Involving parents in the schools: A process of empowerment.American Journal

    of Education, 100(1), 2046.

    Delgado-Gaitan, C. (2001). The power of community: Mobilizing for family and schooling. Denver, CO:

    Rowman & Littlefield.

    Dewey, J. (1904). The relation of theory to practice in education. In J. Dewey, S. Brooks, & F. McMurry

    (Eds.), The relation of theory to practice in the education of teachers (Third Yearbook of the National

    Society for the Study of Education, Part 1; pp. 930). Bloomington, IL: Public School Publishing.

    Dewey, J. (1916).Democracy and education. New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Dewey, J. (1929). The quest for certainty: A study of the relation of knowledge and action. New York, NY:

    Minton, Balch.

    Dewey, J. (1933).How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative

    process. New York, NY: D. C. Heath.

    Dewey, J. (1938).Experience and education. New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Duncan-Andrade, J., & Morrell, E. (2008). The art of critical pedagogy: The promises of moving from

    theory to practice in urban schools. New York, NY: Peter Lang

    Epstein, J. L. (1995). School/family/community partnerships: Caring for the children we share.Phi Delta

    Kappan, 76(9), 701712.

    Freire, P. (2000a).Pedagogy of freedom: Ethics, democracy, and civic courage. Lanham, MD: Rowman &

    Littlefield.

    Freire, P. (2000b).Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum. (Original work published

    1970)

    Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research and practice (2nd. ed.). New York, NY:Teachers College Press.

    Giroux H., & McLaren, P. (1986). Teacher education and the politics of engagement: The case for

    democratic schooling.Harvard Educational Review, 56(3), 213238.

    Giroux, H. (1983). Theory and resistance in education: A pedagogy for the opposition. South Hadley, MA:

    Bergin & Garvey.

    Gitlin, A., & Price, K. (1992). Teacher empowerment and the development of voice. In C. Glickman (Ed.),

  • 7/27/2019 CI260 Syllabus Fall2014 Tentative(1)

    14/15

    CI260, Ullrich, Fall 2014

    14Supervision in transition. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Grant, C. A., Sleeter, C. E. (2009). Turning on learning: Five approaches t o multicultural teaching plans

    for race, class, gender, and disability (5th

    . Ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

    Noffke, S. E. (2009). Revisiting the professional, personal, and political dimensions of action research. In

    S. E. Noffke & B. Somekh (Eds.), The Sage handbook of educational action research (pp. 6-23).

    London, England: Sage.

    Noffke, S., & Somekh, B. (2009). The Sage handbook of educational action research. London, England:

    Sage.

    Noffke, S. E., & Stevenson, R. B. (1995). Educational action research: Becoming practically critical. NY:

    Teachers College Press.

    Sleeter, C. E., & Grant, C. A. (2009).Making choices for multicultural education: Five approaches to race,

    class, and gender (6th. ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Smith, L. (1999).Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London, England: Zed

    Books.

    Sumara, D., & Carson, T. R. (2001). Editorsintroduction: Reconceptualizing action research as a living

    practice. In T. R. Carson & D. Sumara (Eds.), Action research as a living practice (pp. xiiixxxii).

    New York, NY: Peter Lang.

    Ullrich, W. J. (1992). Preservice teachers reflect on the authority issue: A case study of a student teaching

    seminar. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8(4), 361380.

    Ullrich, W. J. (2001). Depth psychology, critical pedagogy, and initial teacher preparation. Teaching

    Education, 10(2), 1733.

    Ullrich, W. J., & roessler, M. (1997). Curriculum that is multicultural and social reconstuctionist. Teaching

    Education, 9(1). Retrieved from http://www.teachingeducation.com/vol91.ullrich.htm

    http://www.teachingeducation.com/vol9http://www.teachingeducation.com/vol9http://www.teachingeducation.com/vol9
  • 7/27/2019 CI260 Syllabus Fall2014 Tentative(1)

    15/15

    CI260, Ullrich, Fall 2014

    15