ci260 syllabus fall2014 tentative(1)
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/27/2019 CI260 Syllabus Fall2014 Tentative(1)
1/15
1
CI260, Ullrich, Fall 2014
COURSE DESCRIPTION
CI260: Critical Pedagogy is built around a variety of themes involving education,
academic achievement, and equity. First, the failure to attend to questions of
purpose is a significant concern of teachers who work within this tradition. Asking
what schools currently do for children and for what purposes, as well as exploring
what schools might do differently and why, is central to MSJE (or equityoriented)
teachers. A second theme is that there is an integral relationship between education
and the broader society. Since the United States is an increasingly diverse, multi-
cultural society where educational policy and practices are deeply embedded,schools and teachers play significant social and political roles. Third, MSJE (or
equity-oriented) teachers provide a vision for the ultimate purposes of education in
society, a vision that involves challenging inequity and injustice and building more
humane schools and society.
**This course is taken concurrently with CI246: Action Research in the MulticulturalClassroom.
REQUIRED TEXTS
Oakes, J., & Lipton, M. (2013). Teaching to change the world (4thEd.). Boulder,CO: Paradigm Publishers.
RECOMMENDED TEXTS
Au, W. (Ed.). (2014). Rethinking multicultural education: Teaching for racial and
cultural justice (2ndEd.)." Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools
Email:[email protected] Work Phone: (559) [email protected] (559) 646-2731
CI 260Critical Pedagogy
FALL 2014, 4 UNITS
Instructors: Dr. Walter J. Ullrich
Samuel Martinez
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected] -
7/27/2019 CI260 Syllabus Fall2014 Tentative(1)
2/15
2
CI260, Ullrich, Fall 2014
Christenson, L. (Ed.). (2009). Teaching for joy and justice: Re-imagining the language
arts classroom. Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools.
Grant, G. A., & Sleeter, C.A. (2009). Turning on learning: Five approaches for
multicultural teaching plans for race, class, gender, and disability (any recentedition).
Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
Gutstein, E., & Peterson, B. (Eds.). (2014). Rethinking mathematics: Teaching socialjustice by the numbers (2nd. Ed.). Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools.
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES
1.Students will explain and produce multicultural, social justice curriculum,
instruction, assessment and classroom management strategies, position
papers, etc. with respect to MSJE theory, models and principles.
2.Students will provide evidence of connections between curriculum, instruction,
assessment and classroom management to the understandings, perspectives,
identities and cultures the school is designed to serve.
3.Students will ensure that subject matter as defined by the state standards is
comprehensible to all of their pupils. Special attention is paid to culturally-and
developmentally-responsive curriculum and pedagogy, special education
students, and English Language Learner students.
4. Students will design and present electronically MSJE and/or bilingual education
position papers, action research activities, lessons, and/or curriculum unit
using a backward design planning process.
REQUIREMENTS
Below are brief descriptions of the requirements for this class. Each requirement is relatedto important learning outcomes. More details on each of these assignments will be
provided during the course through Announcements, Unit Folders, etc. on Blackboard.
Discussion Board (1/2 of your final grade):
Requirements for each of the Discussion Board collegial interactions (we will work insmall collaborative groups) will be posted for each of your 1-week, Sunday-morning-through-Saturday-night Units. Due dates are important for these postings so that
collegial
interaction will occur. Your first posting should occur on or before midnightThursday and a critique of a classmatespost or integration of the insights of your group
insights on or before midnight Saturday. In short, there is a minimum of two postingsper discussion board prompt one original posting and oneposting responding to a
-
7/27/2019 CI260 Syllabus Fall2014 Tentative(1)
3/15
3
CI260, Ullrich, Fall 2014
colleague or group . Discussion postings should reflect higher order thinking (analysis /
synthesis / evaluation/creativity). Responses to classmates should go beyond simple
agreement to add insight, ask for clarification, or respectfully and professionally, challengethinking. These posts will be graded togetherI will average the scores on your Thursday
post and Saturday critique/integration - according to the scoring rubric below.
For those of you in the MAT, the Comprehensive Examination will be primarily basedon thequestions you are responding to each week in CI 260 as well as those in the CI
246. In short, even though the Comprehensive Examination for this program is an open
book, open Blackboard exam, the basic material you will be responding in short essays for
the time specific option or longer essays in the take home option to is distilled in your work
in CI 260 and CI 246. I highly recommend you use the Journal tool to keep notes on the
readings you are integrating into your posts as this will be a good place to review for
your Comprehensive Exam.*
PICK ONE OF THE FOLLOWING FOR THE SECOND MAJOR REQUIREMENT:
Assignments (1/2 of your final grade):
There will be a series of three (3) Assignments (e.g., chapter/article critiques, positionpapers, action research activities, website critiques, etc.) based in the required readings overthe semester. These are referred to as Multicultural, Social Justice Education (MSJE)Assignments. The basic requirements for each of these 4-6 page Assignments are
as follows:
Tie the content in the particular Unit under study directly to your teaching,
curriculum, assessing, connecting with parents and the community, etc.
explaining carefully how this content (#1 Foundations of MSJE; #2 Practice ofMSJE Teaching; #3 Context of MSJE Teaching) affects your classroom, school,
and/or community;
APA formatting (see previous link), including title page and short reference
section;
A minimum of 3 primary or secondary sources in required and recommended
texts and specific chapters in CI260 and texts from CI240, ERA 243, CI241,
CI245, and CI246;
The three basic areas of the written assignments are as follows:
1. Foundations of American Schooling: Democracy, Diversity, InequalitySection I
2.
Practice of Teaching to Change the World Section II3. Context of Teaching to Change the World Section III
OR:
Multicultural, Social Justice or Bilingual Education Curriculum Unit (1/2 of your
final grade):
Design and implement a MSJE and/or bilingual education curriculum unit during the first
2/3 of the course and present significant classroom snapshots of it electronically by theend
-
7/27/2019 CI260 Syllabus Fall2014 Tentative(1)
4/15
4
CI260, Ullrich, Fall 2014
of the course. Design a curriculum unit that you can actually teach and that uses various
elements of multicultural curriculum design that you have been working on overthe courseof the MAT program. In addition to using these elements, the written document you turn in
should include the following components:
A short philosophy statement giving a rationale for why this content is worth
teaching, connecting the unit to ideas from this course and the program. What is
the ideology or set of beliefs and ideas that ground the unit? A brief description of who the unit is for-what students are you planning the unit
for, and anything you know about them that that would be pertinent to yourplanning? (If you interviewed them, include information about what you learned
that is relevant.)
Learning outcomes or objectives for the unit. What should students be able to do,
or gain, as a result of the unit? How will you assess the extent to which studentshave learned what you intend?
A description of the materials and if possible, copies of materials (such as
handouts) or title of books. Specific descriptions of teaching procedures. Dontleave things up to my
imagination! By the end of the semester, produce a short digitized video that capturessignificant
portions of your MSJE or bilingual education unit. Use the videosnapshots from
the Social Justice Videos, Hunter College, City University of New York as a modelof the strengths of your unit. Make it clear how you are using
the material you are
reading and discussing or Assignments in CI260.
**A rough draft of the unit theme or topic, rationale, and student learning outcomeswill be due via Assignments the fourth week of the course (Sept 24). Outlines of the
lessons themselves will be due via Assignments Nov. 5th
. Continue implementing theunit and present video snapshots and final write-up of the unit by December 6th.
GRADING POLICY
Assignment Points Available
DB Posts/Critiques 12 @ 10 points 120
Multicultural, Social Justice Papers 3 @ 40 points
ORMSJE Curriculum Unit/Presentation
120
Total 240
-
7/27/2019 CI260 Syllabus Fall2014 Tentative(1)
5/15
5
CI260, Ullrich, Fall 2014
GRADING SCALE
Letter Grade & of Total
Points Earned
A 90 100%
B 80 89%
C 70 79%
D 60 69%
F < 69%
SCORING RUBRIC
Interacting Substantively and Succinctly with Resources to RefineMSJE
Approach, Model, Theory
Resources to Refine MSJE A roach PointsOriginality (2 Points for Thursday/Saturday Posts; 8 for Assignments or
Parts of MSJE
Unit)
Highlights and amplifies particular ideas in the reading(s); not a meresummary
Creative use of ideas when analyzing, reflecting on, critiquing the
reading(s) and its usefulness for teaching for equity, achievement and
social justice
Critiques the Reading(s) and other Program Material (2 Points for
Thursday/Saturday posts; 12 for Assignments or parts of MSJE Unit) Reflects on the core ideas of the readings as the main sources for
critiquing its usefulness for teaching for equity, achievement, and social
justice.
Reflects on previous schooling/teaching experiences, current
schooling/teaching experiences, program or other relevant readings,
responses of colleagues in program, school and/or community, etc. incritique
Depth of Thought & Analysis (2 Points for Thursday/Saturday posts;
12 for
Assignments or parts of MSJE Unit)
Carries the ideas of the reading further or adapt the idea in a classroom
setting or other possible classroom contexts
Makes connections to other ideas or theories.
Maintains complex discussion without repetition, etc.
Significance or Importance of the Information in this Critique (2
Points for Thursday/Saturday Posts; 8 for Assignments or Parts of
MSJE
Unit)
Ideas presented in such a way(s) that they will lead to classroom
application. Looks beyond potential obstacles, missed or failed attempts, etc. to
envision how to improve the classroom activity consistent with the major
ideas in this and other related reading.
Thoughts consistent with promoting greater equity, achievement, social
justice, higher quality or quantity of learning, etc.
Total
-
7/27/2019 CI260 Syllabus Fall2014 Tentative(1)
6/15
6
CI260, Ullrich, Fall 2014
TENTATIVE COURSE SCHEDULE
Unit Topics Reading and Assignments
Unit 1
Aug. 21-30
Course Overview
Foundations of
American
Schooling:Democracy,
Diversity, and
Inequality
Review syllabus, MSJE units, videos, and actionresearch studies
Reading:
Oakes & Lipton: TheAmerican Schooling
Dilemma: Diversity, Inequality, and Democratic
Values
DB Post and Integrated Critique:
Thursday & Saturday
Unit 2
Aug. 31-
Sept. 6
Foundations of
American
Schooling:
Democracy,
Diversity, and
Inequality
Reading:
Oakes & Lipton: Historyand Culture: How
Expanding Expectations and Powerful
Ideologies Shape Schooling in the United States
DB Post and Critique: Thursday and Saturday
Unit 3
Sept. 7-13
Foundations of
AmericanSchooling:
Democracy,
Diversity, and
Inequality
Reading:
Oakes & Lipton,Politics and Philosophy:
TheStruggle over the American Curriculum
DB Post and Critique: Thursday and Saturday
Integrated
Assignment
Sept. 14-20
Foundations of
American
Schooling:
# 1 Assignment due Sept. 20
-
7/27/2019 CI260 Syllabus Fall2014 Tentative(1)
7/15
7
CI260, Ullrich, Fall 2014
Unit Topics Reading and Assignments
Unit 4
Sept. 21-
27
Practice of
Teaching to
Change the
World
Reading:
Oakes & Lipton, TheSubject Matters:
Constructing Knowledge Across the Content
Areas
Recommend: Darling-Hammond, LearningClassroom pdf and videos.
DB Post and Critique: Thursday and Saturday
Unit 5
Sept. 28-
Oct. 4
Practice of
Teaching to
Change the
World
Reading:
Oakes & Lipton, Instruction:Teaching and
Learning Across the Content Areas
Recommend: Darling-Hammond, Learning
Classroom pdf and videos.
DB Post and Critique: Thursday and Saturday
Unit 6
Oct. 5-11Practice of
Teaching toChange the
World
Reading:
Oakes & Lipton,Assessment:Measuring that
Matters
Recommend: Darling-Hammond, LearningClassroom pdf and videos.
DB Post and Critique: Thursday and Saturday
Unit 7Oct. 12-18
Practice of
Teaching to
Change the
World
Reading:
Oakes & Lipton, Classrooms as Communities:Developing Caring and Democratic
Relationships
Recommend: Darling-Hammond, Learning
Classroom pdf and videos
DB Post and Critique: Thursday and Saturday
-
7/27/2019 CI260 Syllabus Fall2014 Tentative(1)
8/15
8
CI260, Ullrich, Fall 2014
Unit Topics Reading and Assignments
Integrated
Assignment
Oct. 19-25
Practice
of
Teaching
toChange
theWorld
#2 Assignment due Oct. 25
Unit 8
Oct. 26-
Nov. 1
Context
of
Teaching
toChange
theWorld
Reading:
Oakes & Lipton, TheSchool Culture: Where Good
Teaching Makes Sense
DB Post and Critique: Thursday and Saturday
Unit 9
Nov. 2-8Context
of
TeachingtoChange
theWorld
Reading:
Oakes & Lipton,School Structure: Sorting
Students and Opportunities to Learn
DB Post and Critique: Thursday and Saturday
Unit 10
Nov. 9-15
Context
of
Teaching
toChange
theWorld
Reading:
Oakes & Lipton, The Community: Engaging
with Families and Neighborhoods
DB Post and Critique: Thursday and Saturday
Unit 11
Nov. 16-29
Context
of
Teaching
to Change
the World
Reading:
Oakes & Lipton, Teaching to Change the World: AProfession and a Hopeful Struggle
DB Post and Critique: Thursday and Saturday
Unit 10
Nov. 30-
Dec. 6
Context
of
Teaching
to Change
the World
#3 Assignment due December 6
-
7/27/2019 CI260 Syllabus Fall2014 Tentative(1)
9/15
9
CI260, Ullrich, Fall 2014
Comprehen-
sive
Examination
Final
Examinat
ion for
MAT
Students
Final Comprehensive Exam:4-hour, time specific, short essay:
Saturday morning or afternoon, Dec. 13
OR5 day take-home, longer essay, Sunday morning,
Dec. 14-midnight, Thursday, Dec. 18th.
-
7/27/2019 CI260 Syllabus Fall2014 Tentative(1)
10/15
CI260, Ullrich, Fall 2014
10
COURSE
EXPECATIONS
Communication:
Check your email and the course Blackboard sitefrequently. Regular updates will
be posted often. Collaborative assignments require that you post and respond ina timely manner; check group and class discussion boards often when using them
tocomplete assignments. I am available by email throughout the course at
Civility:
As a diverse community of learners, students must strive to work together in a
setting of civility, tolerance, and respect for each other and for the instructor.
Expectations for classroom behavior, which apply equally to on-ground and
online learning environments, include but are not limited to the following:
conflicting opinions among members of a class are to be respected and responded
to in a professional manner. Respond to others in the way that you yourselfwould want tobe addressed.
Collaboration:
Collaboration can benefit the learning of all students. For some assignments, you
will work with your cohort to form a collective response to a question. For others,
you will provide feedback and critiques to your peers. The level of discourse and
interaction is essential for this course.
Professionalism:
Short-term formative assignments are designed to scaffold your learning and
enableyou to successfully complete major assignments. The expectation is thatyou will give careful attention to each of these activities even if a reply or post is
not required.
Timeliness:
In a collaborative online environment, it is particularly crucial that all students
adhere to scheduled deadlines for posting work and/or providing
critiques/feedback. Failure to submit work in a timely manner, or to provide
responses and critiques by the scheduled due date, impacts the learning
opportunities of your peers and will be reflected in your grade for the assignment.
Late assignments are normally not accepted.
TECHNOLOGY
RESOURCES
The following technology resources will be used during this class.
Microsoft Office: You are required to use Microsoft Office on your
computer. For information on campus pricing and purchasing locations, see
Student Technology Special Programs (http://www.csufresno.edu/ait/ait-
links.htm#Software)
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.csufresno.edu/ait/ait-http://www.csufresno.edu/ait/ait-http://www.csufresno.edu/ait/ait-http://www.csufresno.edu/ait/ait-mailto:[email protected]:[email protected] -
7/27/2019 CI260 Syllabus Fall2014 Tentative(1)
11/15
CI260, Ullrich, Fall 2014
11 Adobe Acrobat Reader (Adobe Reader, latest version): Program that
allows you to readpdf files. It can be downloaded from the following Adobe
website (http://www.adobe.com)
Skype: You can download Skype at the following URL:(http://www.skype.com/). We mat use this for collaborative discussions
during the course.
SUBMISSION OF ASSIGNMENTSFormat: Word-processed documents must be in a format that can be opened in
Microsoft Word. If you donthave Word, convert your file to apdf document, which
preserves both text and formatting. If your word processing program does not have
apdf option, choose Rich Text Format (RTF), which preserves the text but not the
formatting. If you have Office 2007 for Windows, there is a compatibility problem
with Mac OS. Microsoft recommends that you save your documents as a
Word/Excel/PowerPoint97-2003Document(.doc,.xls, .ppt) to ensure the
documents can be shared across platforms. If you don not format your assignments
correctly, then your colleagues and I will not be able to open the documents.
File Names:Always begin the document name with your last name and firstinitial (all one word), followed by an underscore (_), a short assignment title, the
date submitted, and the appropriate file extension(e.g., .doc, .ppt). For example,
Ullrich_Paper1_Oct152010.doc. The critical issue here is for your document to have
your name and date submitted.
COURSE POLICY AND SAFETY ISSUES
Subject to Change: This syllabus and schedule are subject to change in the event of
extenuating circumstances and any changes will be clearly announced in the course
to Blackboard regularly to check for announcements and to check your email daily.
Copyright: You will be provided with digital and/or print materials to support your
learning in this course. As all of these materials are proprietary in nature, and most
are protected by copyright, you may not reproduce or retain any of the materials for
purposes other than class work.
UNIVERSITY POLICIES
Policy on Students with Disabilities:
Upon identifying themselves to the instructor and the university, students with
disabilities will receive reasonable accommodation for learning and evaluation. Formore information, contact Services to Students with Disabilities at 559-278-2811.
Policy on Cheating and Plagiarism:
Cheating is the actual or attempted practice of fraudulent or deceptive acts for the
purpose of improving one's grade or obtaining course credit; such acts also include
assisting another student to do so. Typically, such acts occur in relation to
examinations. However, it is the intent of this definition that the term cheating
not be limited to examination situations only, but that it include any and all actions
http://www.skype.com/)http://www.skype.com/)http://www.skype.com/)http://www.skype.com/)http://www.skype.com/) -
7/27/2019 CI260 Syllabus Fall2014 Tentative(1)
12/15
CI260, Ullrich, Fall 2014
12by a student that are intended to gain an unearned academic advantage by
fraudulent ordeceptive means. Plagiarism is a specific form of cheating which
consists of themisuse of the published and/or unpublished works of others by
misrepresenting the material (i.e., their intellectual property) so used as one's own
work. Penalties forcheating and plagiarism range from a 0 or F on a particular
assignment, through an F for the course, to expulsion from the university. For more
information on theUniversity's policy regarding cheating and plagiarism, refer to
the Schedule ofCourses (Legal Notices on Cheating and Plagiarism) or theUniversity Catalog (Policies and Regulations).
Access to Computer Technology:
At California State University, Fresno, computers and communications links to
remote resources are recognized as being integral to the education and research
experience. Every student is required to have his/her own computer or have other
personal access to a workstation (including a modem and a printer) with all the
recommended software. The minimum and recommended standards for the
workstations and software, which may vary by academic major, are updated
periodically and are available from Information Technology Services or the
University Bookstore. In the curriculum and class assignments, students are
presumed to have 24-houraccess to a computer workstation and the necessary
communication links to the University's information resources.
Disruptive Classroom Behavior:
The classroom, whether virtual or physical, is a special environment in which
students and faculty come together to promote learning and growth. It is essential to
this learning environment that respect for the rights of others seeking to learn,
respect for the professionalism of the instructor, and the general goals of academic
freedom are maintained.Differencesof viewpoint or concerns should be expressed
in terms which are supportive of the learning process, creating an environment inwhich students and faculty may learn to reason with clarity and compassion, toshare
of themselves without losing their identities, and to develop andunderstanding of the
community in which they live.Studentconduct whichdisrupts the learning process
shall not be tolerated and may lead to disciplinaryaction and/or removal from the
class.
Bibliography
Apple, M. W. & Beane, J. A. (Eds.). (2007).Democratic schools (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association
for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Apple, M. W. (1986). Teachers and texts: A political economy of class and gender relations in education.
New York, NY: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Apple, M. W., Au, W., & Gandin, L. A. (2009). The Routledge international handbook of critical
education. New York, NY: Routledge.
Apple, M. W., Ball, S. J., & Gandin, L. A. (2010). The Routledge international handbook of the sociology
of education. New York, NY: Routledge.
-
7/27/2019 CI260 Syllabus Fall2014 Tentative(1)
13/15
CI260, Ullrich, Fall 2014
13Banks, J. A. (2006).Race, culture and education.New York, NY: Routledge.
Beane, J. A. (2005). A reason to teach: Creating classrooms of dignity and hope. Portsmouth, NH:
Heinemann.
Beane, J. A. (1997). Curriculum integration: Designing the core of democratic education. New York, NY:
Teachers College Press.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009).Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation .
New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Counts, G. S. (1978/1932).Dare the school build a new social order? Carbondale: Southern Illinois
University Press. (Original work published 1932)
Creswell, J. W. (2009).Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Delgado-Gaitan, C. (1991) Involving parents in the schools: A process of empowerment.American Journal
of Education, 100(1), 2046.
Delgado-Gaitan, C. (2001). The power of community: Mobilizing for family and schooling. Denver, CO:
Rowman & Littlefield.
Dewey, J. (1904). The relation of theory to practice in education. In J. Dewey, S. Brooks, & F. McMurry
(Eds.), The relation of theory to practice in the education of teachers (Third Yearbook of the National
Society for the Study of Education, Part 1; pp. 930). Bloomington, IL: Public School Publishing.
Dewey, J. (1916).Democracy and education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Dewey, J. (1929). The quest for certainty: A study of the relation of knowledge and action. New York, NY:
Minton, Balch.
Dewey, J. (1933).How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative
process. New York, NY: D. C. Heath.
Dewey, J. (1938).Experience and education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Duncan-Andrade, J., & Morrell, E. (2008). The art of critical pedagogy: The promises of moving from
theory to practice in urban schools. New York, NY: Peter Lang
Epstein, J. L. (1995). School/family/community partnerships: Caring for the children we share.Phi Delta
Kappan, 76(9), 701712.
Freire, P. (2000a).Pedagogy of freedom: Ethics, democracy, and civic courage. Lanham, MD: Rowman &
Littlefield.
Freire, P. (2000b).Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum. (Original work published
1970)
Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research and practice (2nd. ed.). New York, NY:Teachers College Press.
Giroux H., & McLaren, P. (1986). Teacher education and the politics of engagement: The case for
democratic schooling.Harvard Educational Review, 56(3), 213238.
Giroux, H. (1983). Theory and resistance in education: A pedagogy for the opposition. South Hadley, MA:
Bergin & Garvey.
Gitlin, A., & Price, K. (1992). Teacher empowerment and the development of voice. In C. Glickman (Ed.),
-
7/27/2019 CI260 Syllabus Fall2014 Tentative(1)
14/15
CI260, Ullrich, Fall 2014
14Supervision in transition. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Grant, C. A., Sleeter, C. E. (2009). Turning on learning: Five approaches t o multicultural teaching plans
for race, class, gender, and disability (5th
. Ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
Noffke, S. E. (2009). Revisiting the professional, personal, and political dimensions of action research. In
S. E. Noffke & B. Somekh (Eds.), The Sage handbook of educational action research (pp. 6-23).
London, England: Sage.
Noffke, S., & Somekh, B. (2009). The Sage handbook of educational action research. London, England:
Sage.
Noffke, S. E., & Stevenson, R. B. (1995). Educational action research: Becoming practically critical. NY:
Teachers College Press.
Sleeter, C. E., & Grant, C. A. (2009).Making choices for multicultural education: Five approaches to race,
class, and gender (6th. ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Smith, L. (1999).Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London, England: Zed
Books.
Sumara, D., & Carson, T. R. (2001). Editorsintroduction: Reconceptualizing action research as a living
practice. In T. R. Carson & D. Sumara (Eds.), Action research as a living practice (pp. xiiixxxii).
New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Ullrich, W. J. (1992). Preservice teachers reflect on the authority issue: A case study of a student teaching
seminar. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8(4), 361380.
Ullrich, W. J. (2001). Depth psychology, critical pedagogy, and initial teacher preparation. Teaching
Education, 10(2), 1733.
Ullrich, W. J., & roessler, M. (1997). Curriculum that is multicultural and social reconstuctionist. Teaching
Education, 9(1). Retrieved from http://www.teachingeducation.com/vol91.ullrich.htm
http://www.teachingeducation.com/vol9http://www.teachingeducation.com/vol9http://www.teachingeducation.com/vol9 -
7/27/2019 CI260 Syllabus Fall2014 Tentative(1)
15/15
CI260, Ullrich, Fall 2014
15