chryssavgis -- beauty and sacredness in sherrard.doc
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/27/2019 Chryssavgis -- Beauty and Sacredness in Sherrard.doc
1/21
John Chryssavgis. Beauty and Sacredness in the Work of PhilipSherrard.Journal of Modern Greek Studies 16.1 (1998) 91-109.
Beauty and Sacredness in the Work of PhilipSherrard
John Chryssavgis
Abstract: Beauty and sacredness are interrelated
concepts, embodied as they are in a sacred
anthropology and cosmology. In his writings, Philip
Sherrard (d. 1995) articulates these profoundvalues with unique eloquence. He writes of the
beauty of the body, as well as of the need for
ascetic discipline. He emphasizes the innate
sacredness of life, art, and culture, but also
criticizes the dehumanization of humanity and the
desacralization of nature in recent times. He
describes the spiritual worldview of traditional
Christianity and the eclipse of this worldview in
contemporary science. In a word, he discerns the
beauty of Christ's countenance even in the
shattered image of the world. Sherrard's prophetic
voice is worth listening to.
"Exceedingly beautiful"
--Psalm 44:3 (45:3)
Introduction
Beauty and sacredness are neither abstract nor subjective realities. Beauty is the
response of creation to the sacredness of God; it is the material expression of a
spiritual reality. The beauty of the world is the tangible indication that this world ismade by a loving, divine God who manifests his transcendent holiness in the
immanent attractiveness of creation. Beauty and sacredness are therefore embodied
in a sacred anthropology and cosmology. They are articulated
-
7/27/2019 Chryssavgis -- Beauty and Sacredness in Sherrard.doc
2/21
in the inspired utterances of prophets, sages,
seers, poets: . . . utterances, affirmed and re-
affirmed in the lives of generation after generation
of holy men and women . . .; and it is initially fromsuch doctrine that . . . we can learn who we are--
what we have the potential to be--and what
constitutes the true nature of the cosmos.
(Sherrard 1990:131-132)
This is how Philip Sherrard describes the transmission of the sacred principles that
define our appreciation of the values of the "beautiful" and the "sacred" in the world.
Notice how theology, cosmology, [End Page 91] and anthropology share the samelanguage in his thought. What Sherrard ultimately envisages is a tradition of beauty
and sacredness--a kind of spiritual "succession" through the centuries, or ametaphysical "pedigree" across cultures--that insures the continuity of the central
values of life and the world.
This outline of Sherrard's thought is based upon some of his major works. 1 I
endeavor to show (a) howthe erotic dimension of life and the environmental crisis
that we confront are in fact two sides of the same coin, (b) how the ascetic and theaesthetic (or iconic) aspects of a Christian world-view are interrelated.
The world of the body
The beauty of Eros. A philosophy of disembodiment is a philosophy of death; atheology of incarnation is a philosophy of life. The human person transcends all
forms of dualism--both inner (between body and soul) and outer (between man and
woman, as well as between humanity and the environment). Extreme asceticism andextreme spiritualism alike represent a partial truth, but to assert a partial truth is to
espouse a heresy. This is why the monastics of third- and fourth-century Egypt were
able to embrace with such veracity and ferocity the struggle within themselvesbetween body and soul: precisely because they were convinced that this reflected the
doctrinal formulation articulated during the same centuries concerning the two
natures united "unconfusedly and undividedly" 2in the one person of Christ.
Far from being a cause for "shame," the body reflects divine beauty and therefore is areason for God's glorification and the world's sanctification. Christians may be to
blame for many of the scars left on the concept of the body, yet
whatever differences there may be in emphasis, it
is quite clear that the notion that man is really a
bodiless spirit or soul who has been embodied
http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#FOOT1http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#FOOT2http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#FOOT2http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#FOOT1http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#FOOT2 -
7/27/2019 Chryssavgis -- Beauty and Sacredness in Sherrard.doc
3/21
temporarily as a result of the fall, and even as a
punishment for falling, so that salvation consists in
freeing the soul from the body and in
disincarnating, is no part of Christian doctrine.(Sherrard 1976:41)
If the incarnate self is the reality of human existence, then we must recognize itsclose involvement with sexuality. Human sexuality is not a mere accident of our
reality. Although sexuality and spirituality are not identical, they are intimately
related. Furthermore, since sexuality and the sense of beauty are also intimatelyrelated, we are called upon to understand sexuality as a living, flowing energy whose
ultimate source lies in God, and whose physical expression is but one aspect of its
fullness. Conversely, if we fail to experience or appreciate sexuality, we [End Page
92] gradually blur our sense of beauty. The sexual indulgence in contemporary
society is evidence of the absence, not of the excess, of true eros. Sherrard (1976:43)wonders whether even our negative attitude toward the natural world "cannot be
traced back ultimately to a fear of sexuality, and whether this fear has not led to ahostility towards and a wish to escape from the body."
It is difficult for a person to become aware of his or her own body without becoming
aware of the bodies of other people. In sexual love, a man and a woman "offer each
other" to the sacredness and beauty of the other, to the God in the other. Sherrard(1990:118) parallels this encounter with the event of the icon. There is an art that is
involved in sexual love, and the purpose of this "art . . . is to transfigure each other . .
. to see each other as the manifestation of the divine Beloved":
It is the same as it is with an icon: each becomes
for the other an icon, so that their love and their
mutual embracing are in recognition of the spiritual
reality that each incarnates. . . . If there is a place
for icons within the Christian framework then there
is a place for sexual love. (1976:47-48)
The body, physical beauty, and our sexuality are like a ladder that permits us to be
raised to divine beauty. They do not distract us, but actually attract us in our ascenttoward God. This is why St. John Climacus, the author ofThe Ladder of Divine
Ascent(late sixth century), can daringly propose: "Blessed is the one who has
obtained such love and yearning for God as a mad lover has for his beloved . . .
generating fire by fire, eros by eros, desire by desire" (1982: steps 26.31 and 30.5).Yet there has been a separation, even an opposition, between sensible beauty and
spiritual beauty. The continuity between sense and spirit has been distorted, even
lost; the ladder is broken. It takes much time and ascetic discipline to restore theladder, binding the heavenly and the earthly together once again. Even in its
-
7/27/2019 Chryssavgis -- Beauty and Sacredness in Sherrard.doc
4/21
religious, moral, and spiritual depth, life can never be authentic without love, without
laughter, without eros, without sensuality, without sexuality, without intensity of
experience.
The purity of passion. This truth has always been understood by mystics and ascetics,who teach us that love is never satisfied, only fulfilled. Sherrard was aware that "the
sense of beauty that goes with [sexual love] cannot be achieved without the highest
degree of chastity" (1976:49). This was why he dedicated so many years of his life tothe English translation of thePhilokalia, the collection of Patristic texts on prayer
and the ascetic life that provides spiritual direction to enable readers to "love the
beautiful" (the literal meaning of the term ). This is also why Sherrard visited
the Holy Mountain so frequently, and fought-- [End Page 93] even to the point of
misunderstanding 3 --to preserve the beauty of its silence. He planned the translationof thePhilokalia from as early as 1971. His collaborators in this genuinely
cooperative venture were Gerald Palmer, who initiated the project but died in 1984,and Bishop Kallistos (Ware) of Diokleia. Sherrard had already completed the firstdraft of the fifth and final volume a month before his death on 30 May 1995. In April
of that year, he wrote to me:
In an effort to finish two, for me, fairly major
undertakings--the first being the translation of the
Philokalia and the second being a new book which I
entitle (provisionally perhaps) Christianity:
Lineaments of a Sacred Tradition 4 --I had to put
virtually everything else to one side. Happily, bothtasks are now concluded, except for the dotting of
several 'i's and the crossing of several 't's; but they
have left me exhausted, far more so than I was
aware of--in fact, the day after I finished the last
chapter of the book I found I could hardly move!
I'm still much in the doldrums, and wait for the
energies to come seeping back, if they will.
In the introduction to the first volume of thePhilokalia, Sherrard describes the bookas
an itinerary through the labyrinth of time, a silent
way of love and gnosis through the deserts and
emptinesses of life, especially of modern life, a
vivifying and fadeless presence. . . . It must be
http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#FOOT3http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#FOOT4http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#FOOT3http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#FOOT4 -
7/27/2019 Chryssavgis -- Beauty and Sacredness in Sherrard.doc
5/21
stressed, however, that this spiritual path . . .
cannot be followed in a vacuum. (Nikodimos and
Makarios 1979:l.13-15) 5
He felt that the texts of thePhilokalia presuppose not a vacuum but a specific
doctrine that entails a specific ecclesiology. The doctrinal dimension will be
examined briefly later, but I might here add that, in accordance with Sherrard's worldview, this ecclesiology needed to be situated in a particular space. Accordingly, the
Philokalia was more than simply "a way" for Sherrard; it was "a place." That place
was the Holy Mountain, which was especially dear to Sherrard's heart because it isthere that the spiritual values of Orthodoxy and the cultural values of Greece unite in
a very dynamic focus. In its natural beauty and its monastic representatives, the Holy
Mountain outwardly materializes the inner treasures of thePhilokalia. He was afrequent visitor, a loving critic, and a literary artist of Mount Athos.
His bookAthos: The Mountain of Silence (1960) provides an inner picture of the
Holy Mountain in a way that no other book in any language has been able to achieve.
This is because he knew well that monasticism, at least in its genuine expression, isneither an abstention from sexual love nor an extinction of the most vital response to
life. Passions in the monastic context are dealt with differently--they are [End Page94] transcended by greater passions. Perhaps a world reduced to "fleshly love" is too
small and narrow when compared to a world of such "passion" (see Sherrard1976:42), a world in which freedom from passion ("apathy") itself becomes a
passion. In Greek philosophy, just as in Greek Patristic theology, passionate love is
conceived in two different ways, either as an infectious disease, in which case it isconsidered intrinsically evil, or as a neutral impulse, in which case it depends on our
free will. In the first instance, passionate or sexual love is perceived as essentially
irrational if not animal, and must be eliminated; in the second and more positiveinstance, however, passion is perceived not as equivalent to vice but rather as an
intrinsic part of human nature created in the image and likeness of God (cf. Gen.
1:26). Therefore, passions must be illuminated, not eliminated. Instead oferadication, they require redirection, transformation, and proper education. One
might even say that passions are more than a purely neutral impulse in life--that they
constitute a necessary force. St. Gregory Palamas (1973:II, ii, chs. 19-22) describes
such passions as "divine and blessed."
A single vivid expression of eros, just like a single vivid experience of beauty, will
advance a person further in the spiritual life--will be more effective--than the mostarduous struggle against passion and the most severely ascetic methods. A single
spark of love is sufficient to ignite a cosmic fire, revealing the whole world's beauty.And a single person alive and alight with this "exceeding beauty" can bring about the
world's reconciliation with God. Such, in Philip Sherrard's mind, is thePhilokalia's
spiritual depth and the prophetic dimension of the Garden of the Panagia, as the HolyMountain is traditionally called.
http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#FOOT5http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#FOOT5 -
7/27/2019 Chryssavgis -- Beauty and Sacredness in Sherrard.doc
6/21
The body of the world
The sacred in life and art. The process of discerning the qualities of beauty and
sacredness in the world of poetry, just as in the body of the world, begins in the mind
and heart. Again: "the primary battle is not cultural, but spiritual; and the artist has tofight it not in the thick of our fragmented and alienated society but in the depths ofhis own being, where alone its outcome will be decided" (Sherrard 1990:41). It is
there that the light "can reveal in created things the beauty that manifests in visible
form the divine beauty of the Creator" (1990:159). For Sherrard, this meanscommunicating "a picture of the divine world order--that is, a picture of how things
are in their true state, or in 'the eyes of God', and not as they appear to us from our
limited point of view" (1990:75). It means connecting to the world of the icon. Justas the monk sees with the eyes of the heart, the icon reveals the world through the
eyes of God. This iconic world, however, is not an unreal world. The icon reverses
[End Page 95] perspective as we know it, abolishing the "objective" distance
between this world and the heavenly Kingdom. There is no double order in creation,no sharp line of demarcation between "material" and "spiritual." The icon constitutes
the epiphany of God in the wood, and the existence of the wood in the presence of
God. In this world, it speaks the "mother" language of the age to come--or indeed,the native ("natural") language of this world. Sherrard literally fought to hold this
essence of reality together:
The reality of each thing is the manifestation of the
spiritual and sacred reality that constitutes its true
and eternal identity and being, and it is immanent
in this reality, as it were ensheathed by it. . . .There is no split, no dualism of Spirit and matter in
reality. (1990:138)
Nothing renders the mystery of life more sensible than the face of God painted on the
wooden surface of the icon, announcing an infinite transcendence and a profound
presence alike. Beauty and holiness have a bearing on personal salvation, beyondhaving any cosmic significance. It is no wonder, then, that the two central theological
events depicted in Orthodox iconography are the Incarnation and the Transfiguration.
In a very real sense, every icon portrays these two events:
For the art of the icon is ultimately so to transformthe person who moves towards it that he no longer
opposes the worlds of eternity and time, of spirit
and matter, of the Divine and the human, but sees
them united in one Reality, in that ageless image-
bearing light in which all things live, move and
-
7/27/2019 Chryssavgis -- Beauty and Sacredness in Sherrard.doc
7/21
have their being. (Sherrard 1990:84)
The icon presupposes and proposes another means of communication, beyond theconceptual, the written or spoken word. It is the "writing out" (literally: icono-
graphy) of that which cannot be written down in theology. Thus the icon not onlyreflects another world, it even communicates that world by transforming this one.
The earth as icon contains within itself the seeds of heaven. All things are sacramentswhen viewed in God's perspective and light. We are called not to lookaticons, but
through them; and, by the same token, we are invited not simply to look at the world,
but to penetrate the surface in order to see the divine beauty that is the sacred depthof all things.
In this respect, the icon resembles a ladder that connects the visible world to the
invisible dimension, the created earth to the uncreated God. Material creation itself
constitutes a ladder that restores the bond between this world and the "next," offering
a "footstool" for the ascent to God (cf. Acts 7:49; Is. 66:1). Indeed, if God were nottangibly present in the very earthiness of this world, then He would not be present in
heaven either. If we could not worship Him visibly, then we [End Page 96] couldnot properly worship Him as invisible. If we are unable to see God in the beauty of
the world, there is no value in merely inferring His presence or holiness from the
world. Sherrard (1990:37) alludes to this image of the ladder when he writes that theartist "must have one foot firmly in the world of time and place, in the world of
change and transitoriness," implying that the other foot should be raised toward the
eternal, spiritual world.
Where the monk on Mount Athos struggles to preserve the "human image" restored
by Christ, the art of the icon claims to proclaim the "world image" revealed by thesame Christ. And this conviction becomes a way of life: "A spiritual or sacred art--
the art, say, of Byzantium and of mediaeval Europe--presupposes a way of lifecentered in the knowledge and experience--or, rather, in a knowledge that is
experience . . . of the universe . . . as issuing from God in successive levels"
(Sherrard 1990:33).
Art is one such level; culture is another. Sherrard's love for the people and poetry ofGreece betrayed the same conviction about the need for an ascetic effort to acquire
the spiritual vision and experience of reality. He always regarded the Orthodox
Church of Greece and modern Greek literature as "two aspects of [one and the same]
culture."6
When Sherrard describes a poet's "visionary experience," it is as if he weretalking about the same mystical contemplation of the heart that is described in the
Philokalia, the same vision that is narrated in the world of the icon: "It seems that at
the moment of vision, the soul, or man's inner being, expands in an embrace whichinfolds all Nature. Only Nature is no longer merely that Nature of which our senses
tell us" (1956:228).
Analyzing the poetry of Dionysios Solomos, Sherrard echoes the same process that
http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#FOOT6http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#FOOT6 -
7/27/2019 Chryssavgis -- Beauty and Sacredness in Sherrard.doc
8/21
we have seen as being the basis of the monastic life and the iconic world:
The artistic process begins with the artist's intuition
of this world, his immediate experience of it,
something which is not possible until he has gonethrough an inner development . . . , in other words
a kind of dying . . . and participation in the world of
spiritual realities. . . . Thus in this traditional view of
art, the artistic operation begins and ends not with
the individual but with the supra-individual world of
the Great Realities. (1956:19-20, 233)
Sherrard felt that, as a result of its traditional roots, Greece did not suffer--at least not
in the same way and to the same degree as did Western Europe and the Westernworld--the rupture of the spiritual world view caused by emphasis on individual
consciousness and the intellectual life. The mythological language of the Orphic andthe [End Page 97] Pythagorean classics, together with the theological vision of the
Christian and Byzantine sources, insured the survival--fragmentary perhaps, but
nevertheless genuine--of a tradition that preserves the memory of spiritual reality.Sherrard (1979:4) outlines the historical and symbolic stages of the gradual loss of
this traditional connection between art and life, "when literature ceased to be an
expression of life, of an experienced reality, and became something else."Nevertheless, the "Great Realities" of Solomos are the "Great Visions" of Kostis
Palamas, who believed that moments of passion, which at first may give birth to
feelings of shame and self-disgust, may become moments in which life fulfills itself,in which ugliness is transformed into beauty (see Sherrard 1956:60, 237). When the
seemingly repulsive aspects of life are accepted and embraced, they will, "through
miraculous metamorphosis, reveal the beauty which, rejected and denied, remains for
ever frustrate in them." Sherrard (1956:53) quotes from Palamas's "Altars":
"Whatever you have within you, good, suffering,
sin, some affliction of the soul, some sickness of
the flesh, confess it. Into the light! All the beautiful
things of earth, to be more beautiful, and the
world's ugly things, to be stirred by the breath ofloveliness, seek a priest to confess them, seek a
love to kiss them. If you have tears, shed them;
they are likely to be pearls. And don't be ashamed
of relics; they too feel pain and weep." 7
The same image is found in the poetry of Angelos Sikelianos, whose first important
http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#FOOT7http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#FOOT7 -
7/27/2019 Chryssavgis -- Beauty and Sacredness in Sherrard.doc
9/21
poem was "The Visionary." Sikelianos derived his mythological attitude to life from
the beliefs and customs of the illiterate peasant folk of Greece who preserved it,
however unconsciously and imperfectly, during the long years of Turkish occupation(see Sherrard 1956:128). In his "Hymn of the Great Home-Coming" Sikelianos
knows the power of eros (Sherrard 1956:134, 161); in the "Word of Greece" heunderstands the power of silence (1956:156), and in "The Visionary" he makes use
of Christian iconography (1956:149). His doctrine may differ from that of much"official" Christianity, but his mysticism--which Sherrard likens to that of Meister
Eckhart--perceives the inner identity where
all has become one, the One has become all, in an
all-embracing singleness; and man, in achieving his
own unity, has become everything. . . . Earth and
sky were once one. They can be one again. Earth
can mix with the stars. The sky can harvest thewheat of earth. In these symbolical terms
Sikelianos represents later the falling into disunity
of things, the division of time from eternity, flesh
from spirit, and the possibility of and need for their
reconciliation if life is to be fulfilled. Man's task is to
bring this reconciliation about. Through the
attainment of spiritual vision, which is the
realization of his nature, he also brings together
the worlds which [End Page 98] have fallen apart,he restores their original unity. But the impulsion
for this act of creative understanding comes from
participation in the life of the senses, in the life of
the physical world. We are far from the cell and the
scourge. (1956:182-183, 127)
With George Seferis, we are again in a world where all the attention is turned toward
the inner center. The opening line of Seferis's early poem "The Cistern" reads "Here,
in the earth, is a cistern rooted." Sherrard recognizes in the poetry of Seferis thereality of another world "rooted" in this world, or
as this present world experienced not from the
point of view of our normal consciousness, but from
the point of view of a level of consciousness
obscured for us by the purely rational categories by
-
7/27/2019 Chryssavgis -- Beauty and Sacredness in Sherrard.doc
10/21
which for the most part we allow ourselves to be
dominated. (1956:244-245)
Indeed, this world of beauty is known also through the power of silence (1956:188),
as well as through the force of passionate love:
For there is a possibility--and in this, Seferis would
seem to imply, lies the significance of such physical
love--that the experience physical love gives will
remind man of something he was in danger of
forgetting: that life can be other than his normal
consciousness allows him to realize; that there are
realms of experience which everyday life obscures;
and that these realms exist nowhere else but inhimself, in the unexplored depths of his own being.
(1956:254)
The entire spiritual world view of the Greeks is personified in General Makriyannis,
whose life and mindset are evidence of the fact that the Greek people
had not gone through that debauchery of
rationalism of which the modern western world is
the product. [They] had not known that split
between mind and instinct, head and heart, and
the consequent paralysis of man's emotional life.
On the contrary . . . the Greek people had
remained for centuries very close to the earth on
which they lived. . . . Their character was much
more a direct expression of the forces of nature
than the product of any self-conscious training or
control. Hence their extreme ego-centerdness;
hence, from an external point of view, the disorderand inconsequence of their life; hence, too, their
spontaneity, naturalness and sincerity: what they
did was not the result of premeditation or
reflection, but simply the breaking forth of the
original life-stream itself. (Sherrard 1979:61)
-
7/27/2019 Chryssavgis -- Beauty and Sacredness in Sherrard.doc
11/21
Makriyannis was a symbol of all this, "a symbol for Greece. And such symbols do
not remain national. They become universal, for they have the power to stimulate
and enrich the heart and mind of man" (1979:71). [End Page 99]
The rape of man and nature. People with such a sacred memory and mythologyrecognize that the center of the heart and of the world lies elsewhere, and draw
significance and life from connecting with this center. On the other hand, people
with a secular mentality considerthemselves to be the center of the universe. "It isthe independence and autonomy we ascribe to our selfhood that is the crux of our
aberration," declares Sherrard (1995:26-29). He calls this autonomy "deceit," "lie,"
"ignorance," "fall," "demonization," and "hell." Furthermore, he is convinced thatthis attitude led to the mechanistic world view that from the seventeenth century
onward resulted in the constantly accelerating dehumanization of man and
desacralization of nature. The "original" cause of this error was a disconnection
between earth and heaven, man and nature, body and soul:
. . . there is in man a difference between his inmost
self and the self with which he usually and
mistakenly identifies himself, his everyday
empirical self; and it may be this split in his self-
awareness . . . that is the most evident symptom of
that internal dislocation of man's being which in
the Christian tradition is indicated by the term
'Fall'. (Sherrard 1987:30)
Although the icon reveals this connection, and although the poet imagines the same
connection and the monk struggles to preserve it, Sherrard is nevertheless
realistically aware that we live in a world where this appreciation of sacredness andattractiveness has been lost. The interdependence (Sherrard [1987:25] favored the
Patristic term ) between heaven and earth has been ruptured, the contract broken.Sherrard may have been a visionary, but he was not an idealist. He believed that the
process of dehumanization and desacralization is not accidental, that modern science
presupposes a radical reshaping of our whole mental outlook. And so he outlined theintellectual developments that led to the "eclipse" of the sacred world view and to the
emergence of scientific philosophy. In his opinion, what was prepared by St. Thomas
Aquinas was consolidated by Descartes--namely, "a radical dualism between souland body, mind and matter, in which the body, along with the rest of the physical
world, is regarded as totally deprived of all spiritual or non-material qualities and
powers" (1987:60, 69).
Sherrard was sometimes accused of overstating his case. Admittedly, somerepresentatives of contemporary Orthodox theology have tended to be sweepingly
-
7/27/2019 Chryssavgis -- Beauty and Sacredness in Sherrard.doc
12/21
critical of Western thought and society. There is an inherent temptation here to which
Sherrard did not succumb. It is nave to suppose that Orthodoxy automatically has
the key to the answers in areas where others have failed. The shattered image of
[End Page 100] humanity and the world is a problem not only of Western
Christianity or Western civilization. While much fine literature has described thiscrisis as a process that began in the late Middle Ages, grew in the Reformation, and
culminated in the modern technological revolution, there is no single era or culturethat may be held responsible for today's disastrous developments. In the language
and culture of thePhilokalia, this would undoubtedly be termed "the sin of pride."
Sherrard himself (1995:12) admits that these "developments . . . had been incubatingin the Christian consciousness for some centuries prior . . . , in both the Greek East
and the Latin West."
Sherrard ought to be read in light of another key concept of thePhilokalia. I am
referring to "metanoia": repentance understood as a radical reversal of the destructive
path that leads to death. This, I believe, is the context within which Sherrard must beappreciated, and the guiding principle behind his thought. "Nothing can stop this
process," he says (1987:88-89), "except a complete reversal of direction. Andnothing can initiate a reversal of direction except a recovery by man of an awareness
of who he is: the cure must go back to where the sickness started." Certainly
Sherrard felt that the matter of ecological annihilation is the major crisis of thiscentury and probably of the next century--"if indeed there is one," as he
characteristically wrote to me (12 January 1991). It seems to me, however, that
Sherrard's entire outlook is colored not so much by a sense of hopelessness before
the ugliness and sinfulness of the world as by a profound sense of hope regarding theworld's beauty and sacredness--an optimism that he draws from the Orthodox
Church's ascetic tradition.
Repentance is clearly at the center of his thought:
If we are to overcome this ignorance, and to
rediscover and reaffirm the true dignity of both
man and nature in a way capable perhaps of
stemming, if not turning, the tide of progressive
materialization and disintegration on which we are
all now carried, it can only be by rediscovering and
reaffirming the spiritual principles on which themasters [of the early Christian tradition] have
based their life and their thought. (1987:118)
However, there is yet another detail that underlies the thought of Philip Sherrard. I
am referring to his basic intuition that the very difficulties that beset our world, thevery distortion of our world view, present God-given opportunities for us to discern
-
7/27/2019 Chryssavgis -- Beauty and Sacredness in Sherrard.doc
13/21
the beauty and holiness of God in the world: ". . . it is only by what one might call
providential intervention that we even begin to recognize and accept that our cosmos
is, or may be, a sacred cosmos" (1990:147). There is a kind of "providence," hebelieves, in the very disastrous disintegration of[End Page 101] the world that we
face. We are, today, in a much better--perhaps privileged--position to acknowledge,albeit reluctantly and retrospectively, the impasse of our life style and its impact on
our world. No matter how carefully modern man has tried to foster a secularmentality divorced from a sacred one, it is today clear that certain "cracks" have
appeared on the earth's face and body. In spite of our actions to control or contain the
world, we now confront a global problem that concerns everyone, irrespective ofrace, color, or creed. Ecological retribution, we now know, will sooner or later
follow suit, indeed with mathematical precision. And herein, at the very root of our
despair, lies the source of our hope. According to Isaac of Nineveh (1923: XIX, p.73), "there is nothing more powerful than despair. For despair cannot be conquered
by anything. . . . When, with our thought, we cut off our hope for life, then there
remains nothing more courageous . . . because then God gives us salvation, strength,and rest."
The most mystical of all experiences is the profound realization of who we are, of
what we have done, and of where we are headed. Our destruction is a lasting
reminder of our destructiveness and as such may become the starting point of ourtransfiguration. Our death can prove the seed of resurrection; the hell that we have
created may inspire the source of healing in our heart and in our world. Repentance,
consequently, is the painful recognition and continual repetition, with God, that the
world was created "beautiful," "very good" (cf. Gen.1). It remains beautiful in spiteof the brokenness and ugliness that we have caused. This is the pervasive and
persuasive argument that underlies Sherrard's passion, almost mission:
Man is called upon to mediate between heaven and
earth, between God and His creation. . . . It is only
through man fulfilling his role as mediator between
God and the world that the world itself can fulfill its
destiny and can be transfigured in the light and
presence of God. It is in this sense that man--when
he is truly human--is also and above all a priest--
the priest of God: he who offers the world to God in
his praise and worship and who simultaneously
bestows divine love and beauty upon the world.
(1987:40-41)
This passage brings us back to the image of the ladder. For the world is not embraced
as an end in itself; rather, it is to be looked through, and read as a book with a
message. Sherrard speaks of the "book of nature," the liber mundi through which and
-
7/27/2019 Chryssavgis -- Beauty and Sacredness in Sherrard.doc
14/21
within which we must discern "the expression of a hidden, interior world, a spiritual
world," just as Holy Scripture reveals an ulterior meaning. Indeed for Sherrard "there
is no separation or division . . . between the truth revealed in the Holy Book and thetruth revealed in the book of nature" (1995:10, 17). [End Page 102]
The face of beauty and "lineaments" of the sacred
It is this sacramental dimension of the world that enables Sherrard to proclaim an
alternative cosmology, one that can discern God's beauty and sacredness in every
part of the created world:
Nature is a revelation not merely of the truth about
God but of God Himself. . . . Were there no
creation, then God would be other than He is; and
if creation were not sacramental, then God wouldnot be its creator and there would be no question
of a sacrament anywhere. If God is not present in a
grain of sand then He is not present in heaven
either. . . . Ultimately it is because we see
ourselves as existing apart from God that we also
see nature as existing apart from God. (1987:94)
There is no authentic beauty in the world outside the unique beauty of Christ; or,
better still, all authentic beauty in the world is a reflection of the beauty of Christ
who, "revealed through the Incarnation the possibility inherent in human nature"(1990:89). When Genesis 1:31 tells us that "God saw everything that He had made,
and, indeed, it was very good" (the Greek term indicates "beautiful"), it is in fact
alerting us to the fact that God's beauty and sacredness are what determine theworld's harmony and holiness. Sherrard never ceased to proclaim this unified truth
about beauty--about the unified source of all beauty and holiness: "When God 'saw
that it was beautiful', this seeing was an act of self-recognition by means of which Heverified that what He saw was a true and faithful image of His own inner and non-
manifest life" (1990:111). Beauty is attractive and substantive inasmuch as it
beckons us to participate in the divine order of things (cf. II Peter 1:14). This is thedefinition of beauty given by Dionysius the Areopagite in his treatise On the Divine
Names (1980:IV, 7; Migne PG 3:701): "as it calls all to itself, hence it is also namedkallos."
The ancient Greeks loved to play on these words. Sherrard, however, goes stillfurther: "Not only this, but since Christ exemplifies the norm for human life, it also
means that there is something radically wrong with us when our whole physical
being is not so irradiated" with the light of His beauty and holiness (1990:86). This
inevitably influences the way in which we perceive the material world around us, for
-
7/27/2019 Chryssavgis -- Beauty and Sacredness in Sherrard.doc
15/21
if the vision we have of our own inner being . . .
does not embrace the spiritual qualities--of beauty,
of love--that fill our being when we attune
ourselves to God, we cannot perceive thesequalities in the forms of the things about us; we
cannot perceive their intrinsic sacredness. The link
between transcendence and immanence is broken.
The intimate interpenetration, the secret
coincidence of uncreated and created, divine
archetype and visible image, is frustrated, and the
marriage between them remains in a state of
suspension. (1990:14) [End Page 103]
This last passage serves as a wonderful synthesis of Sherrard's thought on heaven
and earth, sexuality and marriage, icons and art, as well as on the sacredness of
creation.
In his last public appearance, a lecture entitled "For Every Thing that Lives Is Holy,"
delivered in London on 27 June 1994 to the "Friends of the Center"--a lecture that
Sherrard described (in a letter to me dated 25 November 1993) as "the most powerful
statement" he had ever made on this theme--, he spoke forcefully against anydisconnection of the beauty in this world from the beauty of Christ: "It is this concept
of the double truth--this duplicity in the true sense of the word, or what we might call
'double-think'--that constitutes the major premise that has to be reversed if ever weare to escape from the clutches of our materialist world" (1995:19). Sherrard not only
perceived everythingsub specie aeternitatis, but also in lumine Christi. He discerned
the unique and unifying face of Christ in all things. Unless Christ may be discovered"in the least of His brethren" (Matt. 25:40) and also in the least particle of worldly
matter (Sherrard 1995:22), then He may be far too distant to matter in any real sense.
It is when we are attentive to the iconic presence of the word and wisdom of Christ
that "we begin to see the beauty at the heart of things. And this is the road to therecovery of paradise. This is itself the overture to paradise" (1995:32).
This, again, is an indication that Sherrard is not guilty of overstating or
oversimplifying his case.
8
His purpose is not so much to "attack" science as to"appease" heaven. One would be missing the mark if one explained or dismissed
Sherrard's critical remarks as unduly negative toward science, for the extreme nature
of some of his statements derives from his sensitivity to the tension between heaven
and earth, the tension between the way things are and the way things could or shouldbe. It would be more correct to place Sherrard, too, among the "prophets, sages,
seers, and poets" (1990:131) with which we opened this paper-- those who feel the
liminal vibrations of our estrangement from God and cry out for the reconciliation
http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#FOOT8http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#FOOT8 -
7/27/2019 Chryssavgis -- Beauty and Sacredness in Sherrard.doc
16/21
between this world and the next. Our century has seen other such prophetic figures--
for example, Jacques Ellul 9 --criticizing modern technology and its devastating
effect on the environment.
One ought to read Sherrard's daring remarks about the Theotokos in the same way.Comfortably breathing the air of the Orthodox tradition, Sherrard moves from the
Christological to the Mariological plane in order to reveal the cosmological role of
the Theotokos as a parallel, and even a premise, for the cosmic event of Christ. Asthe "joy of all creation," Mary embraces the uncreated in a manner that corresponds
to that in which Christ assumes humanity. She is the "Mater" of all matter. Sherrard
(1992:181) refers to her as the "universal [End Page 104] nature," the natura
naturans, the matrix in whom everything flowers. Through Mary, we appreciate how
Mariology unveils the femininity of creation, something that lies hidden in the heart
of Orthodox iconography and liturgy. In Orthodox churches built from the late fourth
century onward, the Virgin Mary is depicted in the apse immediately above the altar,
somewhere between heaven and earth. She constitutes the bridge and link betweenthe world and the One who creates and "contains all things" (Christ the Pantokrator).
In comparison to the inaccessible, transcendent God, the Virgin Mary is arguably theperson more immediately and frequently resorted to in daily prayer and devotion.
Thus, in the popular Orthodox Service of the "Akathist Hymn" (early seventh
century), the Theotokos is hailed as "the throne of the King, as bearing the One whobears the universe . . . as the womb of the divine Incarnation and as the one through
whom creation is refashioned [Stasis I]. . . . She is the shelter of the world, broader
than the clouds [Stasis II], the promised land, the land of the infinite God, the key to
Christ's kingdom and the hope of eternal blessings" (Stasis III).
In Orthodox Church decoration it is not by accident that the icon of Mary the"Platytera" (the one who is broader than the whole of creation) is placed beneath the
icon of the "Pantokrator" (the one who upholds all of creation). As an Orthodoxhymn states, "Standing before the temple of her glory, we think that we are in
heaven." Therefore, beside God the Father we find the Mother of God; beside the
King of All we see the Queen of All; beside the "sophia" of the divine Word stands
"the vessel of divine wisdom," that treasury and repository of divine "sophia." Theunceasing response to God's eternal initiative is the continual "let it be" of the Virgin.
Mary's word constantly and completely corresponds to God's Word, lovingly bearing
that Word in her womb and selflessly confirming Him in her life.
Mary is able to realize these "mysteries" precisely because, again in the words of theAkathist hymn, "she has yoked together maidenhood and motherhood," "remaining a
virgin, yet giving birth" (Stasis III). As virgin, she heals the brokenness of the world;
as mother, she fulfills the barrenness of creation. As virgin, she signifies the integrityof life, and not just of celibacy; as mother, she personifies the affirmation of life, and
not just of marriage. The same hymn states that "she brings opposites to unity." Little
wonder that the Virgin Mother is held in high esteem by monastics and married
http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#FOOT9 -
7/27/2019 Chryssavgis -- Beauty and Sacredness in Sherrard.doc
17/21
persons alike. She rightly constitutes the "queen" of heaven, as well as the
"breath" of creation. To adopt an image that we have already used in relation to
the body, to sexuality, to the icon, and to the created world, Mary is hailed as aladder. The Akathist Hymn refers to her "as the heavenly ladder by which God
descended, the bridge that leads the earthly to the heavenly [End Page 105] . . .
[Stasis I]. In her, the heavens rejoice with earth and the earth concelebrates withheaven. . . ." (Stasis II). The same understanding of Mary as the "mother" of all that
is created is the subject of Sikelianos's long poem "The Mother of God." In
considering this poem's feminine element or principle, Sherrard writes the following
about the Theotokos:
She is the passive root or ground of creation, a
state of pure potentiality and receptivity, into
which the spirit pours its fertilizing seed. She is thehuman soul in its state of original purity . . . the
eternal Wisdom itself, the divine Mother, or Mother
Earth, from whose ever-virginal womb issues, after
the penetration of the spirit, earth and everything
that lives. (1956:162) 10
This was the way that Sherrard essentially learned from the writings of the
Philokalia. Whether it was in the "eye of the heart," with his emphasis on the or
"intellect" as the seat of insight and intuition beyond the narrow level of the
reasoning brain; or whether it was on the wood of an icon, which for Sherrardconveyed to us a picture of the divine world order "in the eyes of God" (1990:75);
whether in the mystery of the flesh of man and woman; or whether in the bodily flesh
assumed by Christ through the mystery of the Incarnation; or, again, whether on the
very flesh of the material world--Sherrard saw one and the same thing, namely theface of Christ, which for him was the face itself of beauty and holiness.
Everything on this earth tells of the love of the Creator Christ, and speaks aloud of
the at-one-ment between heaven and earth. Every single thing, if allowed to, not only
reveals the world's beauty but even fulfills the kingdom's holiness. The concluding
words of the Orthodox Divine Liturgy refer to the fulfillment of all; in a very
vital sense, the earthly liturgy is more than a mere concelebration in the worship ofthe heavenly realm. This world, in spite of its shattered image, remains an icon of the
completion and fulfillment of the heavenly kingdom. These are the closing words of
Philip Sherrard's life:
All the phenomena of the world of nature represent
http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#FOOT10 -
7/27/2019 Chryssavgis -- Beauty and Sacredness in Sherrard.doc
18/21
or symbolize with things celestial and divine. . . . In
the whole visible, natural world there is nothing
that does not express or represent something of a
higher invisible world, the spiritual world. Withoutthis rootedness in the spiritual world nothing could
exist for a second, for apart from the spiritual world
nothing can have any existence at all. No visible
thing--nothing. . . . (1995:10-11)
Conclusion
One of Sherrard's most moving pieces is the brief epilogue to The Wound of Greece,
a commentary on the figure of Aretousa in the seventeenth-century [End Page 106]
Cretan epicErotokritos. I offer it here as an epilogue to my paper, and as a "prologueto [his] life" 11 :
Now it is over. . . . Gradually, when the book is
closed, the epic loses its dramatic quality, its
quality of action. The dialogue becomes a
monologue, the monologue itself condenses into
something much finer, something more pure and
uncontaminated . . . [a continuous lyric utterance]:
condenses into the portrait of a person free from
the accident of time and place. . . . He is dead . . . A
love of this kind, if it is to be perfect itself, must
pass through a moment of final despair, of furthest
separation, of complete abandonment: for it is this
death which precedes the deliverance, it is this
that makes possible the beginning of new life.
(1979:118-119, 124)
"The book is closed." Yet Sherrard's books will remain an open testimony to his
quest for beauty and holiness in the world. Although something of the "dramatic
quality" is lost from the epic known as "Philip Sherrard," his passion to preserve the
quality of the world as beautiful and holy cannot be lost. The dialogue, too, hasstopped: the dialogue with God on the level of theological discourse; the dialogue
with Greece on the more cultural level; the dialogue that he loved to entertain with
friends, at Katounia on the island of Evia, on the personal level; the dialogue with theheart on the spiritual level; and even the dialogue with the universe on the ecological
level. Yet the dialogue has been "refined"--"condensed" into a monologue--now that
http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#FOOT11 -
7/27/2019 Chryssavgis -- Beauty and Sacredness in Sherrard.doc
19/21
Philip Sherrard has been transferred, or perhaps he would prefer to say transformed,into the new life and the new world of the heavenly Kingdom (cf. Rev. 21:1-5).
There he can at last rest, "caught up in the clouds . . . to meet the Lord" (I Thess.
4:17), to see more clearly and more fully that which he always imagined, as prophetand poet, about the beauty and the sacredness of the world. For now he is at one withhis soul and body, with the earth that he venerated, as well as with the heaven that he
worshipped.
Holy Cross School of Theology
Notes
1. Specifically, "The world of the body" is based on Christianity and Eros,
complemented by thePhilokalia. "The body of the world" concentrates on The
Sacred in Life and Artand The Marble Threshing Floor, together with The Rape ofMan and Nature. Finally, "The face of beauty and 'lineaments' of the sacred" treats
the culminating synthesis of his thought found in his last publication, the booklet
Every Thing that Lives Is Holy. The word "lineaments" is taken from the title of
Sherrard's last manuscript, which will appear posthumously (see note 4, below).
2. From the doctrinal definition of the Fourth Ecumenical Council, A.D. 451.
3. For his article "The Paths of Athos," which was criticized by monks of the Holy
Mountain, seeEastern Churches Review 9/1-2 (1977):100-107. The final words of
this article are: ". . . the state of the paths of the Holy Mountain can be seen as a
direct reflection of the inner spiritual health of the monastic community."
4. Philip Sherrard's wife, Denise Harvey, generously entrusted this manuscript to me
for publication. It is to be issued in 1998 by Holy Cross Press. Bishop Kallistos Ware
graciously accepted my invitation to contribute the foreword.
5. Bishop Kallistos, in the obituary he wrote for Sherrard (Ware 1995), attributes toSherrard the initial draft of the general introduction.
6. Campbell and Sherrard (1968). See the subtitle of part three (chapters 6 and 7), pp.
189-244.
7. From "seek a priest" to the end is in my translation. Sherrard (1956:42-43)observes that Palamas himself draws a parallel between his own experience, even
anguish, and that of an Athonite monk.
8. See Ware (1950:50). Also cf. Freeland (1988).
http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#REF1http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#REF1http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#REF3http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#REF4http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#REF5http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#REF5http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#REF6http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#REF7http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#REF7http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#REF1http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#REF2http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#REF3http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#REF4http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#REF5http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#REF6http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#REF7http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#REF8 -
7/27/2019 Chryssavgis -- Beauty and Sacredness in Sherrard.doc
20/21
9. See, for example, his The Technological Society and The Betrayal of the West.
10. On the Virgin Mother in Sikelianos, cf. Sherrard 1956:149; on the "eternal
feminine," cf. Sherrard 1956:24.
11. Title of a poem by Sikelianos. Cf. Sherrard (1956:135).
References Cited
Campbell, John and Philip Sherrard
1968Modern Greece. New York: Praeger.
Climacus, John
1982 The Ladder of Divine Ascent. Translated by Colm Luibheid and NormanRussell. Introduction by Kallistos Ware. London: SPCK Press.
Dionysius Areopagita
1980 The Divine Names and Mystical Theology. Translated by John D. Jones.
Milwaukee, Wisconsin: Marquette.
Ellul, Jacques
1964 The Technological Society. Translated by John Wilkinson. New York: Knopf.
1978 The Betrayal of the West. Translated by Matthew J. O'Connell. New York:
Seabury.
Freeland, G.
1988 "Essay Review: The Dehumanization of Humanity and the Desanctification ofthe Natural World--The Search for the Villain."Phronema 3:71-80.
Isaac, Bishop of Nineveh1923Mystic Treatises. Translated by Arent Jan Wensinck. Amsterdam:
Verhandelingen der Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen to Amsterdam.
Migne, Jacques Paul
1857-1912Patrologiae cursus completus . . . , Series Graeca (= PG). 162 volumes.Paris: J. P. Migne.
Nikodimos, Saint and Saint Makarios1979 The Philokalia: The Complete Text. Compiled by St. Nikodimos of the Holy
Mountain and St. Makarios of Corinth. Translated by Philip Sherrard, G. E. H.Palmer, and Kallistos Ware. 4 volumes to date. London and Boston: Faber and
Faber.
Palamas, Saint Gregory
1973Defense des saints hesychastes. Edited and translated by Jean Meyendorff. 2nd
http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#REF9http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#REF10http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#REF11http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#REF9http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#REF10http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/journals/journal_of_modern_greek_studies/v016/#REF11 -
7/27/2019 Chryssavgis -- Beauty and Sacredness in Sherrard.doc
21/21
edition. Louvain: Spicilegium Sacrum Lovaniense.
Sherrard, Philip
1956 The Marble Threshing Floor: Studies in Modern Greek Poetry. London:
Valentine, Mitchell.1960Athos, the Mountain of Silence. London and New York: Oxford University
Press. Reprinted asAthos, the Holy Mountain in Woodstock, New York, by
Overlook Press, 1982.1976 Christianity and Eros: Essays on the Theme of Sexual Love. London: S.P.C.K.
Reprinted in 1996. Limni, Greece: Denise Harvey.
1979 The Wound of Greece: Studies in Neo-Hellenism. New York: St. Martin's Press.
1987 The Rape of Man and Nature: An Enquiry into the Origins and Consequences
of Modern Science. Ipswich, United Kingdom: Golgonooza Press.
1990 The Sacred in Life and Art., Ipswich, United Kingdom: Golgonooza Press.
1992Human Image, World Image: The Death and Resurrection of SacredCosmology. Ipswich, United Kingdom: Golgonooza Press.
1995For Every Thing That Lives Is Holy. London: Temenos Academy.n.d. Christianity: Lineaments of a Sacred Tradition (forthcoming). Brookline,
Massachusetts: Holy Cross Press.
Ware, Bishop Kallistos
1995 "Philip Sherrard (1922-95)." Sobornost17 (2):45-52.