choice of system and the energy equation bruce sherwood ruth chabay department of physics north...

9
Choice of System Choice of System and and the Energy the Energy Equation Equation Bruce Sherwood Ruth Chabay Department of Physics North Carolina State University NC STATE UNIVERSITY This project was funded in part by the National Science Foundation (grants DUE-0320608 and DUE-0237132). Opinions expressed are those of the authors, and not necessarily those of the Foundation.

Upload: clare-farmer

Post on 05-Jan-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Choice of System and the Energy Equation Bruce Sherwood Ruth Chabay Department of Physics North Carolina State University NC STATE UNIVERSITY This project

Choice of System andChoice of System andthe Energy Equationthe Energy Equation

Choice of System andChoice of System andthe Energy Equationthe Energy Equation

Bruce SherwoodRuth Chabay

Department of PhysicsNorth Carolina State University

NC STATE UNIVERSITY

This project was funded in part by the National Science Foundation (grants DUE-0320608 and DUE-0237132). Opinions expressed are those of the authors, and

not necessarily those of the Foundation.

Page 2: Choice of System and the Energy Equation Bruce Sherwood Ruth Chabay Department of Physics North Carolina State University NC STATE UNIVERSITY This project

Review of potential energy

intextparticles WWE

extintparticles )( WWE

Interpretation: Potential energy is interaction energy of pairs of particles, the internal work done by all pairs of particles in a system on each other.

extparticlessys WUEE We’ll consider situations where there is negligible Q (heat; microscopic work)

Page 3: Choice of System and the Energy Equation Bruce Sherwood Ruth Chabay Department of Physics North Carolina State University NC STATE UNIVERSITY This project

Pair-wise interaction energy

2 particles: 1 pair

3 particles: 3 pairs (12, 23, 13)

4 particles: 6 pairs (12, 23, 34, 13, 14, 24)

For example, in the Sun+Earth+Moon system there are 3 terms in the potential energy:

MoonEarth,MoonSun,EarthSun, UUU

Page 4: Choice of System and the Energy Equation Bruce Sherwood Ruth Chabay Department of Physics North Carolina State University NC STATE UNIVERSITY This project

System: falling rock alone

extsys WE

mghK

Interpretation: The Earth, which is external to the chosen system, does positive work on the system, increasing the kinetic energy of the rock.

h

Page 5: Choice of System and the Energy Equation Bruce Sherwood Ruth Chabay Department of Physics North Carolina State University NC STATE UNIVERSITY This project

System: Earth plus falling rock

extsys WE

0 UK

Interpretation: No external work is done on the Earth-rock system. The kinetic energy of the rock increases. The pair-wise interaction energy (potential energy) decreases.

0)( mghK

h

Earth

Page 6: Choice of System and the Energy Equation Bruce Sherwood Ruth Chabay Department of Physics North Carolina State University NC STATE UNIVERSITY This project

The rock has no potential energy

(Mis)interpretation leads to double counting. Potential energy is associated with pair-wise interactions inside a system. The rock alone has no potential energy. Rather, external work is done on the rock by the Earth.

mghmghK )(extWUK

Page 7: Choice of System and the Energy Equation Bruce Sherwood Ruth Chabay Department of Physics North Carolina State University NC STATE UNIVERSITY This project

Change in potential energy isassociated with change of shape

EarthEarth

There is no change of shape of the rock alone.

Page 8: Choice of System and the Energy Equation Bruce Sherwood Ruth Chabay Department of Physics North Carolina State University NC STATE UNIVERSITY This project

A more complicated example

Barbell alone: mghFhK

FhUK Barbell + Earth:

0int EUKBarbell + Earth + woman:

Page 9: Choice of System and the Energy Equation Bruce Sherwood Ruth Chabay Department of Physics North Carolina State University NC STATE UNIVERSITY This project

Matter & InteractionsRuth Chabay & Bruce Sherwood

John Wiley & Sons, 2002http://www4.ncsu.edu/~rwchabay/mi