state assessment, sherwood

7/28/2019 State Assessment, Sherwood

1/49

Building Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Sherwood Elem (61937)

Program Type: Assessment Only

Setting: Suburban

Assessment Name: 61937-Sherwood Elementary - FINAL

Assessment Date: 2004-06-22

Cost Set: 2004

Building Name: Sherwood Elem

Building Address: 7080 Grantham Way

Building City: Cincinnati

Building Zipcode: 45230

Building Phone: 513-231-7565

Acreage: 20

Current Grades: K-6

Teaching Stations: 40

Number of Floors: 1

Student Capacity: 379

Current Enrollment: 549

Enrollment Date: 2003-10-01

Enrollment Date is the date in which the current enrollment was taken.

Number of Classrooms: 32

Historical Register NO

Buildings Principal: Ms. M Pamela Gribi

Building Type: Elementary/Middle

Current Elementary Enrollment: 486

Current Middle Enrollment: 63

Current High Enrollment: 0

Current Career Technical Enrollment: 0

Next Page

Report Generated at 2 May 2005 15Building Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Sherwood Elem (61937) Page 1


2/49

Building Pictures - Forest Hills Local SD(47340) - Sherwood Elem(61937)

North elevation photo: East elevation photo:

South elevation photo: West elevation photo:

GENERAL DESCRIPTION

55,805 Total Existing Square Footage

1970,1993 Building Dates

K-6 Grades

549 Current Enrollment

40 Teaching Stations

20 Site Acreage

Sherwood Elementary, which is not on the National Register of Historic Buildings, is a 1970, single story, 55,805 square foot school building located in a suburban residentialsetting. The existing facility does not use modular buildings. The structure of the overall facility contains steel frame construction with non-bearing masonry wall construction, witnon-bearing masonry wall construction in the interior. The floor system consists of concrete slab on grade and metal form deck on steel joist. The roof structure is tectum andmetal deck on steel joist. The roofing system of the facility is a combination of ballasted EPDM and built-up with gravel ballast, installed in phases between 1985 and 1988. Theventilation system of the building is inadequate to meet the needs of the users. The classroom wing is an open concept design, which is different in terms of the current standard

established by the State of Ohio. Physical Education and Student Dining spaces consist of one Gymnasium and separate Student Dining. The electrical system for the facility isgenerally adequate although outlets are not always convenient in the open concept design. The facility is equipped with a non-compliant security system. The building has anon-compliant fire alarm system. The facility is not equipped with a complete automated fire suppression system. The building is reported to contain asbestos and other hazardomaterials. The overall building is not compliant with ADA accessibility requirements. The school is located on a 20-acre site adjacent to residential properties. The property is notfenced for security. Access onto the site is unrestricted. Site circulation is fair. There is dedicated space for school buses to load and unload on the site. Parking for staff, visitorsand community events is adequate. The open concept has been modified slightly in some areas with the installation of tall casework. This has caused air circulation to becompromised.

Report Generated at 2 May 2005 15Building Pictures - Forest Hills Local SD(47340) - Sherwood Elem(61937) Page 2


3/49

Previous Page

Next Page

Report Generated at 2 May 2005 15Building Pictures - Forest Hills Local SD(47340) - Sherwood Elem(61937) Page 3


4/49

Building Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Sherwood Elem (61937)

Program Type: Assessment Only

Setting: Suburban

Assessment Name: 61937-Sherwood Elementary - FINAL

Assessment Date: 2004-06-22

Cost Set: 2004

Building Name: Sherwood Elem

Building Address: 7080 Grantham Way

Building City: Cincinnati

Building Zipcode: 45230

Building Phone: 513-231-7565

Acreage: 20

Current Grades: K-6

Teaching Stations: 40

Number of Floors: 1

Student Capacity: 379

Current Enrollment: 549

Enrollment Date: 2003-10-01

Enrollment Date is the date in which the current enrollment was taken.

Number of Classrooms: 32

Historical Register NO

Buildings Principal: Ms. M Pamela Gribi

Building Type: Elementary/Middle

Current Elementary Enrollment: 486

Current Middle Enrollment: 63

Current High Enrollment: 0

Current Career Technical Enrollment: 0

Next Page

Report Generated at 2 May 2005 15Building Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Sherwood Elem (61937) Page 4


5/49

Building Construction Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Sherwood Elem (61937)

Name Year Handicapped AccessFloorsSquare Feet

Original Building 1970 no 1 52,700

Classroom Addition 1993 yes 1 3,105

Previous Page

Next Page

Report Generated at 2 May 2005 15Building Construction Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Sherwood Elem (61937) Page 5


6/49

Building Component Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Sherwood Elem (61937)

Addition Auditorium C orridorsAgricultural

Education LabGymnasium

MediaCenter

VocationalSpace

StudentDining

Kitchen Natatorium

Original Building (1970) 4920 3343 2614 1668 1684

Classroom Addition (1993)

Previous Page

Next Page

Report Generated at 2 May 2005 15Building Component Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Sherwood Elem (61937) Page 6


7/49

Career Technical Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Sherwood Elem (61937)

No Career Technical Programs Present

Previous Page

Next Page

Report Generated at 2 May 2005 15Career Technical Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Sherwood Elem (61937) Page 7


8/49

Main Assessment Menu - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Sherwood Elem (61937)

Building Summary - Sherwood Elem (61937)

District: Forest Hills Local SD

Name: Sherwood Elem

Address: 7080 Grantham Way

Cincinnati,OH 45230

Bldg. IRN: 61937

County: Hamilton Area: Cincinnati (1)

Contact: Ms. M Pamela Gribi

Phone: 513-231-7565

Date Prepared: 2004-06-22 By: Tony Zircher

Date Revised: 2004-11-22 By: Bill Mentges

Current Grades K-6 Acreage: 20

Proposed Grades N/A Teaching Stations: 40

Current Enrollment 549 Classrooms: 32

Projected Enrollment N/A

Addition Date HA Number of Floors Current Square Feet



Total 55,805

*HA = Handicapped Access

*Rat ing =1 Sat isfactory

=2 Needs Repair

=3 Needs Replacement

*Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction

FACILITY ASSESSMENTCost Set: 2004 Rating

DollarAssessment C

A. Heating System 3 $1,199,807.50 -

B. Roofing 3 $318,252.00 -C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning 1 $0.00 -

D. Electrical Systems 2 $158,700.00 -

E. Plumbing and Fixtures 2 $43,100.00 -

F. Windows 3 $48,670.00 -

G. Structure: Foundation 1 $0.00 -

H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys 2 $28,350.00 -

I. Structure: Floors and Roofs 1 $0.00 -

J. General Finishes 3 $913,947.50 -

K. Interior Lighting 3 $223,220.00 -

L. Security Systems 3 $93,707.50 -

M. Emergency/Egress Lighting 3 $55,805.00 -

N. Fire Alarm 3 $83,707.50 -

O. Handicapped Access 3 $104,430.50 -

P. Site Condition 2 $142,971.60 -

Q. Sewage System 1 $0.00 -

R. Water Supply 1 $0.00 -

S. Exterior Doors 3 $42,000.00 -

T. Hazardous Material 2 $14,110.00 -

U. Life Safety 3 $191,366.25 -

V. Loose Furnishings 3 $111,610.00 -

W. Technology 3 $321,994.85 -

- X. Construction Contingency /Non-Construction Cost

- $996,659.85 -

Total $5,092,410.05

CEFPI Appraisal Summary

Section Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating CategoCover Sheet

1.0The School Site 100 84 84% Satisfacto

2.0Structural and Mechanical Features 200 132 66% Borderl

3.0Plant Maintainability 100 70 70% Satisfacto

4.0Building Safety and Security 200 163 82% Satisfacto

5.0Educational Adequacy 200 102 51% Borderl

6.0Environment for Education 200 125 63% Borderl

Commentary

Total 1000 676 68% Borderl

C=Under Contract

Renovation Cost Factor 100.44

Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied) $5,114,816

The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary irequested from a Master Plan.

Previous Page

Report Generated at 2 May 2005 15Main Assessment Menu - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Sherwood Elem (61937) Page 8


9/49


Original Building (1970) Summary


Name: Sherwood Elem


Cincinnati,OH 45230

Bldg. IRN: 61937



Phone: 513-231-7565










Total 55,805



=2 Needs Repair




DollarAssessment C





F. Windows 3 $48,670.00 -








N. Fire Alarm 3 $79,050.00 -







U. Life Safety 3 $181,275.00 -


W. Technology 3 $304,079.00 -


- $954,848.90 -

Total $4,878,777.95









Commentary


C=Under Contract






10/49


Classroom Addition (1993) Summary


Name: Sherwood Elem


Cincinnati,OH 45230

Bldg. IRN: 61937



Phone: 513-231-7565










Total 55,805


*Rating =1Satisfactory

=2 Needs Repair




DollarAssessment C

A. Heating System 3 $66,757.50 -

B. Roofing 3 $0.00 -C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning 1 $0.00 -

D. Electrical Systems 2 $0.00 -

E. Plumbing and Fixtures 2 $0.00 -

F. Windows 3 $0.00 -








N. Fire Alarm 3 $4,657.50 -


P. Site Condition 2 $980.80 -



S. Exterior Doors 3 $0.00 -

T. Hazardous Material 2 $155.00 -

U. Life Safety 3 $10,091.25 -


W. Technology 3 $17,915.85 -


- $41,810.96 -

Total $213,632.11









Commentary


C=Under Contract



The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary isrequested from a Master Plan.



11/49

Facility Assessment

A. Heating System

Description: The existing system for the original facility is an electric system, installed in 1970, and is in fair to poor condition. One main roof mounted airhandling unit and two roof mounted condensing units serve the classroom area. Conditioned air is ducted to individual areas then it passes thruinduction units with reheat coils. Additional electric reheat coils are located near the exterior classroom doors. Other areas such as thegymnasium, stage, commons, music, and LD classroom are served by separate deck mounted air handling units with separate roof mountedcondensing units. The equipment was installed in 1970 and is in fair to poor condition. The system does not comply with the 15 CFM per personfresh air requirements of the Ohio Building Code mechanical code and Ohio School Design Manual. The electronic system temperature controlswere installed in 1970 and are in poor condition. The 1993 addition is an electric heat pump system installed in 1993 and in fair condition. Rooftopmounted electric heat pump units with separate temperature control serve the addition classrooms and associated spaces. The system does notfeature individual temperature controls in all spaces required by the OSDM. The overall heating system is evaluated as not being in safe andefficient working order, and long term life expectancy of the existing system is not anticipated. The entire structure was originally equipped with aiconditioning, but some of the equipment is no longer operational. The site does not contain underground fuel tanks.

Rating: 3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations: Provide new overall heating, ventilating, and air conditioning system to achieve compliance with Ohio Building Code and Ohio School DesignManual standards.

Item Cost Unit WholeBuilding

Original Building(1970)52,700 ft

Classroom Addition(1993)3,105 ft

Sum Comments

HVAC System Replacement:$18.00sq.ft. Required Required $1,004,490.00(includes demo of existing system and reconfiguration of pipinglayout and new controls and air conditioning)

Convert To Ducted SystemReplacement

$3.50sq.ft. Required Required $195,317.50(includes cost for vert. & horz. chases, cut openings, soffi ts, etc.)

Sum: $1,199,807.50 $1,133,050.00 $66,757.50

Deck Mounted Air Handling Unit Induction Unit

Back to Assessment Summary

Report Generated at 2 May 2005 15:Facility Assessment Page 11


12/49

Facility Assessment

B. Roofing

Description: The roof over the original building open classroom area is a ballasted EPDM system that was installed in 1988, and is in fair condition. The roofover the remainder of the original building is a built up system with gravel ballast that was installed in 1985, and is in fair condition. The roof overthe addition is a built-up system with gravel ballast that was installed in 1993, and is in fair condition. There are no District reports of currentleaking. Signs of past leaking were observed during the physical assessment. Access to the roof was gained by access hatch and access ladderthat are in fair condition. There were observations of standing water on the roof. Metal flashings are in fair condition. Roof drains are adequate innumber, properly located, and in fair condition.


Recommendations: The roof over the original facility requires replacement to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines for age of system and due to condition.

Item Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1970)52,700 ft

Classroom Addition (1993)3,105 ft

Sum Comments

Built-up Asphalt:$6.00sq.ft. (Qty) 53,042 Required $318,252.00

Sum: $318,252.00 $318,252.00 $0.00

Ballasted EPDM Roofing Addition Built-Up Roofing




13/49

Facility Assessment

C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning

Description: The overall facility is equipped with an air conditioning system in fair to poor condition. The existing system for the original facility is an electricsystem, installed in 1970, and is in fair to poor condition. One main roof mounted air handling unit and two roof mounted condensing units servethe classroom area. Conditioned air is ducted to individual areas then it passes thru induction units with reheat coils. Additional electric reheatcoils are located near the exterior classroom doors. Return air passes through a louver in the utility island. The ceiling is then used as a return airplenum. Air circulation is becoming limited due to barriers constructed to separate classrooms. Other areas such as the gymnasium, stage,commons, music, and LD classroom are served by separate deck mounted air handling units with separate roof mounted condensing units. Theequipment was installed in 1970 and is in fair to poor condition. The system does not comply with the 15 CFM per person fresh air requirementsof the Ohio Building Code mechanical code and Ohio School Design Manual. The system temperature controls were installed in 1970 and are inpoor condition. The 1993 addition is a heat pump system installed in 1993 and in fair condition. Rooftop mounted heat pump units with separatetemperature control serve the addition classrooms and associated spaces. The system does not feature individual temperature controls in allspaces required by the OSDM. The overall heating system is evaluated as not being in safe and efficient working order, and long term lifeexpectancy of the existing system is not anticipated. The site does not contain underground fuel tanks. Dust collection systems are not requiredin this facility. Exhaust systems for restrooms, kitchen, and gymnasium are adequate.

Rating: 1 Satisfactory

Recommendations: Provide an air conditioning system to meet with Ohio Building Code and Ohio School Design Manual requirements. Pricing included in Item A.

Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Building (1970)52,700 ft


SumComments

Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Air Handling & Condensing Unit Condensing Units




14/49

Facility Assessment

D. Electrical Systems

Description: The electrical system provided to the overall facility is a 480 volt, 1200 amp, 3 phase 4 wire system installed in 1970, and is in fair condition. Thesystem in the 1993 addition is an extension of the original construction. Power is provided to the school by a single utility owned, pad-mountedtransformer located in the rear of the school, and in fair condition. The panel system, installed in 1970 and 1993, is in fair condition and haslimited expansion capability. The classrooms are not equipped with adequate electrical outlets. The typical classroom contains 4 general purposeoutlets. Dedicated outlets for technology components are provided but quantity does not meet OSDM requirements. There are some restroomspaces that have no electrical outlets. The corridors are equipped with adequate electrical outlets for servicing. There are adequate GFI protectedexterior outlets located around the perimeter of the building. The overall electrical service meets Ohio School Design Manual requirements insupporting the current needs of the school. The quantity of outlets will be inadequate to meet the facilitys future needs.

Rating: 2 Needs Repair

Recommendations: Provide additional panels, circuits, and outlets as required to comply with design manual standards.



Sum Comments

Panel Replacement: $3,000.00unit 2 Required $6,000.00(power or lighting sub-panel only)Step-down Transformer:$1,500.00lump sum Required $1,500.00

Additional Circuits: $800.00per circuit 84 Required $67,200.00Additional Receptacles $250.00each 336 Required $84,000.00

Sum: $158,700.00 $158,700.00 $0.00

Transformer Main Electrical Panel




15/49

Facility Assessment

E. Plumbing and Fixtures

Description: The service entrance is equipped with a reduced pressure backflow preventer in fair condition. A water treatment system is provided and is ingood condition. The domestic water supply piping in the overall facility is copper in fair condition. The waste piping in the overall facility is castiron in fair condition. The facility is equipped with two gas recycling water heaters and one 500 gallon hot water storage tank. One water heater isoriginal, has a 62 gal/hr capacity, and is in fair condition. The other water heater is new, has a 95 gal/hr capacity, and is in good condition. Theschool contains 3 restrooms for boys, 3 restrooms for girls, and 8 individual restrooms. Boys restrooms contain 1 ADA and 3 non-ADA wallmounted flush valve toilets, 1 ADA and 10 non-ADA wall mounted flush valve urinals, and 2 basin type lavatories, 1 ADA and 1 non-ADA wallmounted lavatories. Girls restrooms contain 2 ADA and 9 non-ADA wall mounted flush valve toilets, as well as 2 basin type lavatories, 2 ADA and1 non-ADA wall mounted lavatories. Individual restrooms contain 1 ADA and 7 non-ADA wall mounted flush valve toilets, 1 non-ADA wallmounted urinal, 2 non-ADA countertop, 1 ADA and 3 non-ADA wall mounted lavatories. The facility is equipped with 1 non-ADA drinkingfountains, as well as 1 ADA and 4 non-ADA electric water coolers, in fair condition. The school meets the OBC requirements for fixtures. ADArequirements are not met for fixtures and drinking fountains (see Item O). Project Laboratories are not equipped with required gas / compressedair connections, and safety shower / eyewash. Adequate exterior wall hydrants are provided.


Recommendations: Provide 8 new fixtures to replace existing basin type lavatories. Provide emergency shower / eyewash, compressed air, natural gas connectionsin science classroom as required by OSDM. See Item O for replacement of fixtures related to ADA requirements.




Sum Comme

Sink: $2,500.00unit 8 Required $20,000.00(new)

HIGH BAY/INDUSTRIAL SPACE - LAB TYPES 5,6,7 - SafetyShower/Eyewash - New Installation

$2,500.00each 1 Required $2,500.00

HIGH BAY/INDUSTRIAL SPACE - LAB TYPES 5,6,7 - Natural GasConnections

$800.00each 7 Required $5,600.00

HIGH BAY/INDUSTRIAL SPACE - LAB TYPES 5,6,7 - Compressed AirConnections

$15,000.00persystem

1 Required $15,000.00

Sum: $43,100.00 $43,100.00 $0.00

Wall Mounted Urinals Basin Lavatory




16/49

Facility Assessment

F. Windows

Description: The original facility is equipped with two thermally broken aluminum windows with double pane insulated glazing type window system, which wasinstalled during the remodeling of the locker rooms to form an art room. They are in fair condition. The original facility is equipped with onealuminum window with single pane glazing, in poor condition. The 1993 addition is equipped with thermally broken aluminum frame windows withdouble pane insulated glazing type window system, which was installed in 1993, and is in fair condition. The exterior doors in the original facilityare equipped with aluminum frame sidelights and transoms with single pane glazing, in fair condition. The exterior doors in the 1993 addition areequipped with steel frame sidelights and transoms with double pane insulated glazing, in fair condition. The school does not contain skylights.


Recommendations: Replace the existing non-insulated window system in the original building with a new insulated window system to match existing insulated systemand comply with Ohio School Design Manual requirements. Replace transoms and sidelights in exterior doors of the original facility.



Sum Comments

Insulated Glass/Panels: $50.00sq.f t. (Qty) 56 Required $2,800.00(with integral blinds)

Curtain Wall/Storefront System:$55.00sq.ft. (Qty) 834 Required $45,870.00Sum: $48,670.00 $48,670.00 $0.00

Original Building Addition Windows




17/49

Facility Assessment

G. Structure: Foundation

Description: The overall facility is equipped with concrete foundation walls on concrete footings, which displayed no locations of major settlement, cracking, orleaking, and are in good condition. The District reports that there has been no past leaking.


Recommendations: Existing conditions require no renovation or replacement at the present time.

Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Building (1970)52,700 ft Classroom Addition (1993)3,105 ft SumComments

Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Concrete Foundation at Loading Dock Original Building Concrete Foundations




18/49

Facility Assessment

H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys

Description: The original facility has a steel frame supporting the roof structure with a brick veneer on a masonry non-bearing wall system, which displayedminor locations of deterioration, and is in good condition. The 1993 addition has brick veneer with load bearing masonry construction. Theexterior masonry appears to have appropriately spaced and adequately caulked control joints in fair condition. The exterior masonry has not beencleaned and sealed in recent years. Interior walls are non-bearing concrete masonry units and acoustic partitions and are in fair condition. Interiormasonry appears to have adequately spaced and caulked control joints in fair condition. The windowsills are an element of the aluminum windowsystem, and are in fair condition. The exterior lintels are in fair condition. The school does have sufficient expansion joints, and they are in faircondition.

Rating:2 Needs Repair

Recommendations: Provide masonry cleaning and sealing as required through the overall facility.



Sum Comments

Exterior Masonry Cleaning:$1.00sq.ft. (Qty) 14,800 Required 1,400 Required $16,200.00(wall surface)Exterior Masonry Sealing: $0.75sq.ft. (Qty) 14,800 Required 1,400 Required $12,150.00(wall surface)

Sum: $28,350.00 $25,900.00 $2,450.00

Steel Frame / Non-Bearing Masonry Brick Chimney




19/49

Facility Assessment

I. Structure: Floors and Roofs

Description: The floor construction of the base floor of the overall facility is concrete slab on grade construction, and is in fair condition. The floor constructionof the mechanical decks is metal form deck on steel joist construction, and is in fair condition. There is no crawl space. The roof construction ofthe gymnasium stage area is tectum deck on steel joists. The remainder of the roof structure is metal deck on steel joist construction, and is ingood condition.





SumComments

Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Steel Joists & Tectum Deck Steel Joist & Metal Deck




20/49

Facility Assessment

J. General Finishes

Description: The original design of Sherwood Elementary School utilized open concept design. The overall facility has classrooms with carpet type flooring,acoustic tile (ACT) type ceilings, and concrete masonry unit (CMU) type wall finishes, and they are in fair condition. Note that the CMU walls areonly around the perimeter of the open concept classroom volume. The overall facility has corridors with carpet type flooring, ACT type ceilings,and CMU type wall finishes, and they are in fair condition. The overall facility has restrooms with ceramic tile type flooring, gypsum board typeceilings, and CMU type wall finishes, and they are in fair condition. The Gymnasium has wood flooring, exposed tectum deck ceiling, and CMUtype wall finishes, and they are in fair condition. Gymnasium telescoping stands are not provided. Student Dining has carpet type flooring, ACTceilings, and CMU wall finishes, and they are in fair condition. Classroom casework in the overall facility is wood construction with plastic laminatetops, is inadequately provided, and in fair condition. Classrooms are not provided adequate chalkboards, markerboards, and tackboards. Existingboards are in fair condition. The classroom storage cubbies are not adequately provided. The facility is equipped with wood (some louvered)interior doors in fair condition. The toilet partitions are metal construction, and are in fair condition. The existing kitchen is full service. The existingkitchen equipment is original to the facility, and in fair condition.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of finishes and casework due to existing conditions and to installation of systems outlined in Items A, C, K, L, M, TU. Replace toilet partitions due to installation of systems in item O. Replace toilet accessories as required. Replace kitchen equipment due to ageand condition.



ClassroomAddition (1993)3,105 ft

Sum Comments

Toilet Partitions: $750.00perstall

2 Required $1,500.00(removing and replacing)

Toilet AccessoryReplacement

$0.20sq.ft. Required $10,540.00(per bui lding area)

Door, Frame, and Hardware: $1,500.00each 4 Required $6,000.00(non ADA)

Total Kitchen EquipmentReplacement:

$105.00sq.ft.(Qty)

1,684 Required $176,820.00(square footage based upon only area of food preparation, serving,kitchen storage areas and walk-ins. Includes demolition and removalexisting kitchen equipment)

Other: Completereplacement of finishes andcasework

$12.85sq.ft.(Qty)

45,171 Required2,661 Required $614,641.20Elementary Area

Other: Completereplacement of finishes andcasework

$13.10sq.ft.(Qty)

7,529 Required 444 Required $104,446.30Middle School area

Sum: $913,947.50 $873,937.25 $40,010.25

Media Center Gymnasium




21/49

Facility Assessment

K. Interior Lighting

Description: The typical open classroom in the overall facility is equipped with T-8 2x4 lay-in and 1 x 4 surface mounted fluorescent fixtures with dual levelswitching. Classroom fixtures are in fair condition and provide an average illumination of 45 FC, which is less than the 50 FC recommended bythe OSDM. The typical Corridors in the overall facility are equipped with T-8 1 x 4 surface mounted fluorescent fixtures with dual level switching.Corridor fixtures are in fair condition and provide an average illumination of 40FC, thus complying with the 20 FC recommended by the OSDM.The gymnasium space is equipped with T-12 pendant mount fluorescent fixtures, in fair condition, and providing an average illumination of 37FC,which is less than the 50FC recommended by the OSDM. The Media Center is equipped with 1 x 4 surface mounted T8 fluorescent fixture typelighting in fair condition, and providing an average illumination of 53FC, thus complying with the 50 FC recommended by the OSDM. The StudentDining space is equipped with 4x4 surface mount T-8 fluorescent fixture type lighting in fair condition, and providing an average illumination of34FC, which is less than the 50 FC recommended by the OSDM. The service areas in the overall facility are equipped with T-8 fluorescent fixturetype lighting in fair condition. The typical Administrative spaces in the overall facility are equipped with lay-in T-8 fluorescent fixture type lighting infair condition, and providing adequate illumination based on OSDM requirements. The overall lighting systems of the facility are not fullycompliant with Ohio School Design Manual requirements due to age, condition and to inadequate lighting levels.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of lighting system due to condition, lighting levels and installation of systems outlined in Items A, C, M, and U.



Sum Comments

Complete Building Lighting Replacement$4.00sq.ft. Required Required $223,220.00

Sum: $223,220.00 $210,800.00 $12,420.00

Student Dining Open Classroom Lighting




22/49

Facility Assessment

L. Security Systems

Description: The overall facility contains a custom home type security system in fair condition. Motion detectors are adequately provided in offices, corridors,and spaces where 6 or more computers are located. Exterior doors are equipped with door contacts. An automatic visitor control system is notprovided. CCTV cameras are not provided. The security system is not adequately provided throughout, and the system is not fully compliant withOhio School Design Manual guidelines. The exterior site lighting system is equipped with surface mounted mercury vapor entry lights in faircondition. Pedestrian walkways are not illuminated. Parking and bus pick-up / drop off areas are illuminated by pole mounted metal halide andmercury vapor fixtures in fair condition. The exterior site lighting system provides inadequate coverage.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of security system to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines. Provide additional site lighting as required.



Sum Comments

Security System: $1.50sq.ft. Required Required $83,707.50(complete, area of building)

Other: Partial Exterior Lighting Upgrade$10,000.00allowance Required $10,000.00Upgrade as required.Sum: $93,707.50 $89,050.00 $4,657.50

Main Security Panel Motion Detector




23/49

Facility Assessment

M. Emergency/Egress Lighting

Description: The overall facility is equipped with an emergency egress lighting system consisting of illuminated exit signs and emergency floodlighting. Thesystem is in good condition, and is provided with appropriate battery backup. The system appears to be adequately provided throughout, andmeets Ohio School Design Manual requirements. Many of the emergency egress lighting devices are hung from the lay-in acoustic ceiling.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of emergency / egress lighting system due to installation of systems outlined in Item J.



Sum Comments

Emergency/Egress Lighting:$1.00sq.ft. Required Required $55,805.00(w/ battery pack)

Sum: $55,805.00 $52,700.00 $3,105.00

Emergency Lighting Emergency Egress Lighting




24/49

Facility Assessment

N. Fire Alarm

Description: The overall facility is equipped with a fire alarm system in fair condition, consisting of manual pull stations, horn and strobe indicating devices.The system is automatic and is monitored by a third party. The system is not equipped with sufficient flow switches, tamper switches, smokedetectors, and heat sensors. The system is not adequately provided throughout. The system is not fully compliant with Ohio Building Code,NFPA, and Ohio School Design Manual requirements.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of fire alarm system to meet NFPA and Ohio School Design Manual guidelines.



Sum Comments

Fire Alarm System:$1.50sq.ft. Required Required $83,707.50(complete new system, including removal of existing)

Sum: $83,707.50 $79,050.00 $4,657.50

Fire Alarm Panel Strobe Indicating Device




25/49

Facility Assessment

O. Handicapped Access

Description: Some of the exterior entrances are ADA accessible. Some entrances are compromised by a single step. Access from the parking / drop-off areato the building entries is not compromised by steps or steep ramps. Adequate handicap parking is provided. Exterior doors are equipped withADA hardware. The main entry is not equipped with an ADA power assist door. Special provisions for floor level changes in this split levelstructure have been appropriately addressed by use of a chair lift. The chair lift provides access to the stage. Some interior doors are recessedwithout adequate clearances. Interior doors are not provided with ADA-compliant hardware. 6 ADA-compliant toilets are required, and 3 arecurrently provided. 6 ADA-compliant lavatories are required, and 3 are currently provided. 3 ADA-compliant urinals are required, and 1 is currentlyprovided. 3 ADA-compliant electric water coolers are required, and 1 is currently provided. Toilet partitions are metal. Some do not provideappropriate ADA clearances. ADA-compliant accessories are not adequately provided and mounted. ADA signage is not provided on both theinterior and the exterior of the building.


Recommendations: Provide ADA-compliant signage, power assist door opener, electric water coolers, toilets, sinks, urinals, toilet partitions, toilet accessories, doorsand frames and door hardware in the original facility to facilitate the schools meeting of ADA requirements.




Sum Comments

Handicapped Hardware: $350.00set 39 Required 6 Required $15,750.00(includes installation / hardware only)Signage: $0.10sq.ft. Required Required $5,580.50(per building area)

Electric Water Coolers: $1,800.00unit 2 Required $3,600.00(replacement double ADA)Toilet/Urinals/Sinks: $1,500.00unit 8 Required $12,000.00(replacement ADA)

Toilet Partit ions: $1,000.00stall 3 Required $3,000.00(ADA - grab bars, accessories included)ADA Assist Door &Frame:

$7,500.00unit 1 Required $7,500.00(openers, electrical, patching, etc)

Replace Doors: $3,000.00leaf 19 Required $57,000.00(rework narrow opening to provide 3070 wood door, HM frame,door/light, includes hardware)

Sum: $104,430.50 $102,020.00 $2,410.50

Chair Lift Non-ADA Electric Water Cooler




26/49

Facility Assessment

P. Site Condition

Description: The 20 acre sloped site is located in a suburban residential setting with generous tree, shrub, and floral type landscaping. There are apparentproblems with ponding on the north side of the facility, but no erosion was identified. The site is bordered by lightly traveled city streets. A singleentrance onto the site separates into a parking area and a bus loop to facilitate proper separation of bus and other vehicular traffic. Staff andvisitor parking is facilitated by an asphalt parking lot, which provides adequate parking for staff members, visitors, and the disabled. The parkinglot has sufficient space for approximately 100 cars. The parking lot is currently being reworked, so it was not possible to obtain the exact quantityof parking spaces. The parking lot drainage design, consisting of appropriate slopes and catch basins, provides adequate evacuation of stormwater, and no problems with parking lot ponding were observed. Concrete curbs in fair condition are appropriately placed. Concrete sidewalks areproperly sloped, are located to provide a logical flow of pedestrian traffic, and are in fair condition. Site fencing is not provided. The playgroundequipment is in good condition, and on a combination of hard and soft surfaces. The athletic facilities are comprised of 2 baseball diamonds anda soccer field, and are in fair condition.


Recommendations: Provide new wearing course on bus loop and rear parking area. Main parking lot rework is already contracted to be done. Provide additionalstorm drainage line to correct ponding issue. Replace damaged concrete as required.



ClassroomAddition (1993)3,105 ft

Sum Comments

Asphalt Paving / New Wearing Course: $0.56sq.ft.(Qty)

14,505 Required855 Required $8,601.60(includes minor crack repair in less than 5% ofpaved area)

Concrete Sidewalk: $4.00sq.ft.(Qty)

831 Required 49 Required $3,520.00(5 in exterior slab)

Base Sitework Allowance for UnforeseenCircumstances

$50,000.00allowance Required $50,000.00Include this and one of the next two. (Applies fowhole building, so only one addition should havthis item)

Sitework Allowance for UnforeseenCircumstances for buildings between 0 SF and100,000 SF

$1.50sq.ft. Required $79,050.00Include this one or the next. (Each addition shohave this item)

Other: Site drainage $18.00ln.ft. 83 Required 17 Required $1,800.00Correct PondingSum: $142,971.60 $141,990.80 $980.80

Bus Loop Playground Equipment




27/49

Facility Assessment

Q. Sewage System

Description: The sanitary sewer system is tied in to the municipal system in fair condition. No significant system deficiencies were reported by the schooldistrict or noted during the physical assessment.



Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Building (1970)52,700 ft Classroom Addition (1993)3,105 ft SumComments

Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00




28/49

Facility Assessment

R. Water Supply

Description: The domestic water supply system is tied in to the municipal system, features 4 inch service, and is in fair condition. The facility is not equippedwith an automated fire suppression system, and the existing water supply will not provide adequate support for a future system. The domesticwater service is not equipped with a water booster pump, and none is required. The system does not provide adequate pressure and capacity forthe future needs of the school.





SumComments

Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Water Service Entrance




29/49

Facility Assessment

S. Exterior Doors

Description: Typical exterior doors in the original facility are aluminum type construction, mounted on aluminum frames, and in fair condition. Doors featuresingle pane glass vision panels. Typical exterior doors in the 1993 addition are hollow metal type construction, mounted on hollow metal frames,and in good condition. Doors feature double pane thermally broken vision panels. There is one overhead door that is aluminum type in faircondition.


Recommendations: Replace original building exterior doors due to work required in Item F. See item F for transom and sidelight replacement.



Sum Comments

Door Leaf/Frame and Hardware:$2,000.00per leaf 21 Required $42,000.00(includes removal of existing)

Sum: $42,000.00 $42,000.00 $0.00

Original Building Entry Door Classroom Egress Door




30/49

Facility Assessment

T. Hazardous Material

Description: The School District provided the AHERA three year reinspection reports, prepared by Paran Consulting Services, Inc., and dated January 2002,documenting known and assumed locations of asbestos and other hazardous materials. Asbestos floor t ile and mastic containing hazardousmaterials are located in the original facility. These materials were described in the report to be in non-friable condition. There are no undergroundstorage tanks on the site. Due to the construction date, there is a potential for lead based paint. Fluorescent lighting will require special disposal.


Recommendations: Remove all hazardous materials, inclusive of asbestos-containing materials in the original facility, as noted in the attached Environmental

Hazards Assessment. Provide for the testing of paint that has the potential of being lead-based. Provide for disposal of fluorescent lighting.




Sum Comments

Environmental Hazards Form EHA Form EHA Form

Resilient Flooring Removal - Incl. Mastic $3.00sq.ft.(Qty)

440 Required 0 Required $1,320.00

Estimated Cost For Abatement Contractor to Perform LeadMock-Ups

$1.00per unit 5,000 Required 0 Required $5,000.00

Special Engineering Fees $1.00per unit 5,000 Required 0 Required $5,000.00

Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Recycling/Incineration $0.05sq.ft.(Qty)

52,700 Required 3,105 Required $2,790.25

Other: T Discrepancies from Old EHA System (Renovationonly)

-$0.25lumpsum

Required -$0.25T Discrepancies From Old EHASystem

Sum: $14,110.00 $13,955.00 $155.00

Asbestos Tile Flooring Asbestos Flooring




31/49

Facility Assessment

U. Life Safety

Description: The overall facility is not equipped with an automated fire suppression system. A limited area system exists in one storage room. Exit corridorsare situated such that dead-end corridors are present at the north gymnasium entrance. The kitchen hood is equipped with an ansul firesuppression system. There are an adequate number of fire extinguishers that are adequately spaced. The existing water supply is provided by atie-in to the municipal system, and is insufficient to meet the future fire suppression needs of the school. Rooms with capacity greater than 50 areequipped with adequate egress.


Recommendations: Provide automated fire suppression system to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines. Correct dead end corridor condition.




Sum Comments

Sprinkler / Fire SuppressionSystem:

$3.25sq.ft. (Qty) 52,700 Required 3,105 Required $181,366.25(includes increase of service piping, i frequired)

Other: Reconfigure door location $10,000.00allowance Required $10,000.00Correct dead end corridor

Sum: $191,366.25 $181,275.00 $10,091.25

Hood Suppression System Limited Area Sprinkler




32/49

Facility Assessment

V. Loose Furnishings

Description: The typical classroom furniture is mismatched, and in generally fair condition, consisting of student desks & chair, teacher desk & chair, filecabinet, reading table, bookcases, and wastebasket. The facility furniture and loose equipment was evaluated in item 6.17 in the CEFPI sectionof this report, and on a scale of 1 to 10 the facility received a rating of 7 due to observed conditions, and due to the fact that it lacks some of theDesign Manual required elements.


Recommendations: Provide for replacement of outdated or inadequate furniture.



Sum Comments

CEFPI Rating 7$2.00sq.ft. Required Required $111,610.00

Sum: $111,610.00 $105,400.00 $6,210.00

Open Classroom Furniture Loose Furnishings




33/49

Facility Assessment

W. Technology

Description: The typical classroom is not equipped with the Ohio School Design Manual required four technology data ports for student use, one data port forteacher use, one voice port with a digitally based phone system, one cable port and monitor. A 2-way PA system that can be initiated by eitherparty does exist. The facility does not contain an instructional delivery center, but computer labs are provided for student use.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of technology systems to meet Ohio School Design Manual requirements.



Sum Comments

Non-OSDM Compliant:$5.77sq.ft. Required Required $321,994.85

Sum: $321,994.85 $304,079.00 $17,915.85

Typical Data Outlet Technology Racks




34/49

Facility Assessment

X. Construction Contingency / Non-Construction Cost

Renovation Costs (A-W) $4,095,750.20

7.00% Construction Contingency $286,702.51

Subtotal $4,382,452.71

16.20% Non-Construction Costs $709,957.34

Total Project $5,092,410.05

Construction Contingency $286,702.51

Non-Construction Costs $709,957.34

Total for X. $996,659.85

Non-Construction Costs Breakdown

Soil Borings 0.03% $1,314.74

Agency Approval Fees 0.20% $8,764.91

Construction Testing 0.15% $6,573.68

Printing 0.30% $13,147.36

Advertising 0.05% $2,191.23

Builders Risk 0.20% $8,764.91

Design Professional Compensation 7.50% $328,683.95

CM Compensation 6.00% $262,947.16

Non-Construction Contingency (includes partnering and mediation services) 1.77% $77,569.41

Total Non-Construction Costs 16.20% $709,957.34




35/49

School Facility Appraisal

Name of Appraiser Bill Mentges Date of Appraisal 2004-06-22

Building Name Sherwood Elem

Street Address 7080 Grantham Way

City/Town, State, Zip Code Cincinnati, OH 45230

Telephone Number(s) 513-231-7565

School District Forest Hills Local SD

Setting: Suburban

Site-Acreage 20 Building Square Footage 55,805

Grades Housed K-6 Student Capacity 379

Number of Teaching Stations 40 Number of Floors 1

Student Enrollment 549

Dates of Construction 1970,1993

Energy Sources: Fuel Oil Gas Electric Solar

Air Conditioning: Roof Top Windows Units Central Room Units

Heating: Central Roof Top Individual Unit Forced Air

Hot Water Steam

Type of Construction

Load bearing masonry

Steel frame

Concrete frame

Wood

Steel Joists

Exterior Surfacing

Brick

Stucco

Metal

Wood

Stone

Floor Construction

Wood Joists

Steel Joists

Slab on grade

Structural slab


Report Generated at 2 May 2005 15:School Facility Appraisal Page 35


36/49

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

1.0 The School Site


Points Allocated Points

1.1 Site is large enough to meet educational needs as defined by state and local requirements 25 20

The 20 acre site is smaller than the 25.5 acres recommended by OSDM for a combination school per current enrollment.

1.2 Site is easily accessible and conveniently located for the present and future population 20 18

The site is centered within the population it serves and allows for many walking students.

1.3 Location is removed from undesirable business, industry, traffic, and natural hazards 10 9

The site has residential surroundings.

1.4 Site is well landscaped and developed to meet educational needs 10 9

The landscaping is mature and well placed.

1.5 ES Well equipped playgrounds are separated from streets and parking areas 10 9

MS Well equipped athletic and intermural areas are separated from streets and parking

HS Well equipped athletic areas are adequate with sufficient solid-surface parking

The playground is well equipped with hard and soft surfaces available which are away f rom traffiic.

1.6 Topography is varied enough to provide desirable appearance and without steep inclines 5 4

Gently sloping site provides desirable appearance.

1.7 Site has stable, well drained soil free of erosion 5 4

Soil is free from erosion and appears to be stable.

1.8 Site is suitable for special instructional needs, e.g., outdoor learning 5 4

An outdoor seating area is available.

1.9 Pedestrian services include adequate sidewalk with designated crosswalks, curb cuts, and correct slopes 5 4

Correctly sloped sidewalks, crosswalks, and curb cuts exist in the front of the school. Pedestrian access is limited in the rear due to steep slopes.

1.10 ES/MS Sufficient on-site, solid surface parking for faculty and staff is provided 5 3

HS Sufficient on-site, solid surface parking is provided for faculty, students, staff and community

The amount of parking does not meet OSDM standards. Replacement of asphalt is currently under contract.

TOTAL - The School Site 100 84


Report Generated at 2 May 2005 15:CEFPI Ratings Sheet Page 36


37/49

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features


Structural Points Allocated Points

2.1 Structure meets all barrier-free requirements both externally and internally 15 10

ADA requirements are met with regards to entry and vertical circulation, but many other areas require revision.

2.2 Roofs appear sound, have positive drainage, and are weather tight 15 5

Low slope roofing provides adequate drainage. Evidence of ponding was noted. The District did not report any current roof leaks.

2.3 Foundations are strong and stable with no observable cracks 10 10

No cracking was observed in the foundations.

2.4 Exterior and interior walls have sufficient expansion joints and are free of deterioration 10 8

The facility is equipped with sufficient expansion joints and walls are in good condition.

2.5 Entrances and exits are located so as to permit efficient student traffic flow 10 8

Building entrances are properly located for the efficient flow of traffic.

2.6 Building envelope generally provides for energy conservation (see criteria) 10 8

Composite masonry walls, insulated roof, and thermally broken windows provide an adequate building envelope.

2.7 Structure is free of friable asbestos and toxic materials 10 8

According to the report provided by the District, hazardous materials exist. See the worksheet at the end of this report for summary of hazardous materials.

2.8 Interior walls permit sufficient flexibility for a variety of class sizes 10 9

Open concept structure.

Mechanical/Electrical Points Allocated Points

2.9 Adequate light sources are well maintained, and properly placed and are not subject to overheating 15 13

Light fixtures appeared to be well maintained. Dark spots were not observed.

2.10 Internal water supply is adequate with sufficient pressure to meet health and safety requirements 15 7

Water supply is from a municipal system, has a backflow preventer and has adequate pressure, but is insufficient for future fire suppression.

2.11 Each teaching/learning area has adequate convenient wall outlets, phone and computer cabling for technologyapplications

15 6

A typical open classroom is equipped with a series of electrical drops and no phone. The facility does not meet the OSDM technology requirements.

2.12 Electrical controls are safely protected with disconnect switches easily accessible 10 6



38/49

Electrical panels are located in student occupied areas.

2.13 Drinking fountains are adequate in number and placement, and are properly maintained including provisions forthe disabled

10 5

The O.B.C. requires one drinking fountain per 100 students. The building capacity requires 6 drinking fountains. The existing facility has 6 drinking fountains. ADArequires that 50 percent of drinking fountains be accessible. One of the drinking fountians is accessible. Bubblers are provided in classrooms to fulfill overallrequirements, but are not ADA accessible.

2.14 Number and size of restrooms meet requirements 10 4

The O.B.C. requires that restrooms be located on every floor and that the maximum travel distance shall not exceed 500 feet. The facility meets the requirement.

The size of public restrooms is such that ADA access is achievable. The size of individual restrooms is such that ADA access is not possible.

2.15 Drainage systems are properly maintained and meet requirements 10 10

The waste piping is cast iron. The District reported that no problems existed with the drainage system.

2.16 Fire alarms, smoke detectors, and sprinkler systems are properly maintained and meet requirements 10 2

The fire alarm system does not meet current code requirements. There is no sprinkler system.

2.17 Intercommunication system consists of a central unit that allows dependable two-way communication betweenthe office and instructional areas

10 8

The PA system provides two way communication that can be initiated from either party.

2.18 Exterior water supply is sufficient and available for normal usage 5 5

Hose bibbs are located near areas where water is needed.

TOTAL - Structural and Mechanical Features 200 132




39/49

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

3.0 Plant Maintainability


Points Allocated Points

3.1 Windows, doors, and walls are of material and finish requiring minimum maintenance 15 9

Aluminum windows, aluminum, steel, and wood doors, and CMU walls require moderate maintenance.

3.2 Floor surfaces throughout the building require minimum care 15 12

Typical classrooms and corridors have carpet f looring. Typical restrooms have ceramic tile.

3.3 Ceilings and walls throughout the building, including service areas, are easily cleaned and resistant to stain 10 5

The lay-in acoustic ceiling panels are not resistant to stain and must be replaced when damaged. Painted wall surfaces are cleaned easily. Brick wall surfaces arehard to clean.

3.4 Built-in equipment is designed and constructed for ease of maintenance 10 10

Built-in equipment is constructed of plastic laminate which requires low maintenance.

3.5 Finishes and hardware, with compatible keying system, are of durable quality 10 5

The hardware has a quality finish, but is not ADA accessible. The keying system is adequate.

3.6 Restroom fixtures are wall mounted and of quality finish 10 5

Toilets are wall mounted flush valve. Urinals are wall mounted flush valve. Lavatories are wall mounted or countertop set. ADA requirements are not met. The fixturesare in fair condition.

3.7 Adequate custodial storage space with water and drain is accessible throughout the building 10 8

Custodial closets with mop sink are available throughout the building. Storage is limited.

3.8 Adequate electrical outlets and power, to permit routine cleaning, are available in every area 10 8

Electrical outlets are located as required for cleaning.

3.9 Outdoor light fixtures, electrical outlets, equipment, and other fixtures are accessible for repair and replacement 10 8

Outdoor light fixtures provide adequate light levels in front of the building. Electrical outlets are conveniently located. Outdoor mechanical equipment is easilyaccessible.

TOTAL - Plant Maintainability 100 70




40/49

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

4.0 Building Safety and Security


Site Safety Points Allocated Points

4.1 Student loading areas are segregated from other vehicular traffic and pedestrian walkways 15 12

The facility is equipped with a separate bus loop.

4.2 Walkways, both on and offsite, are available for safety of pedestrians 10 8

Correctly sloped sidewalks, with crosswalks and curb cuts exist in the front of the school. Pedestrian access is limited in the rear due to steep slopes.

4.3 Access streets have sufficient signals and signs to permit safe entrance to and exit from school area 5 3

A school sign is provided to permit safe access.

4.4 Vehicular entrances and exits permit safe traffic flow 5 4

A single entrance/exit separates into a bus loop and a parking area.

4.5 ES Playground equipment is free from hazard 5 4

MS Location and types of intramural equipment are free from hazard

HS Athletic field equipment is properly located and is free from hazard

The playground is well equipped with hard and soft surfaces available which are away f rom traffic.

Building Safety Points Allocated Points

4.6 The heating unit(s) is located away from student occupied areas 20 20

The mechanical room is located away from student areas. Heat distribution is away from student interaction.

4.7 Multi-story buildings have at least two stairways for student egress 15 15

This is a single story facility.

4.8 Exterior doors open outward and are equipped with panic hardware 10 9

Exterior doors open outward per O.B.C. requirements and have panic hardware.

4.9 Emergency lighting is provided throughout the entire building with exit signs on separate electrical circuits 10 9

The exit lighting is powered by battery backup. The system appears to meet current building code standards.

4.10 Classroom doors are recessed and open outward 10 0

Open concept structure lacks interior doors.

4.11 Building security systems are provided to assure uninterrupted operation of the educational program 10 6

The facility is equipped with a security system with motion detectors and door contacts.



41/49

4.12 Flooring (including ramps and stairways) is maintained in a non-slip condition 5 5

The stairs have non-slip pads. No slippery areas were identified in the site visit. The entry doors have step off mats.

4.13 Stair risers (interior and exterior) do not exceed 6 1/2 inches and range in number from 3 - 16 5 5

This is a single story facility, but has steps to get to a lower gym/auditorium level. The stair risers measure 6 inches and typically fall into the acceptable range.

4.14 Glass is properly located and protected with wire or safety material to prevent accidental student injury 5 2

Glass in interior doors and display cases did not appear to be properly located. Glass in exterior door assembly appeared to be properly protected.

4.15 Fixed Projections in the traffic areas do not extend more than eight inches from the corridor wall 5 4

Drinking fountains extend more than the allowable dimension.

4.16 Traffic areas terminate at an exit or a stairway leading to an egress 5 3

There are no dead end corridors in the facility. Open concept doesnt define egress well.

Emergency Safety Points Allocated Points

4.17 Adequate fire safety equipment is properly located 15 14

The number of fire extinguishers appears to meet the requirements. The kitchen hood is equipped with a fire suppression system.

4.18 There are at least two independent exits from any point in the building 15 15

Rooms with capacity greater than fifty persons are equipped with two exits. There are no dead end corridor in the facility.

4.19 Fire-resistant materials are used throughout the structure 15 15

The entire building structure is constructed with non-combustible materials.

4.20 Automatic and manual emergency alarm system with a distinctive sound and flashing light is provided 15 10

An emergency alarm system exists, but it is not equipped with all of the code required indicating devices.

TOTAL - Building Safety and Security 200 163




42/49

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

5.0 Educational Adequacy


Academic Learning Space Points Allocated Points

5.1 Size of academic learning areas meets desirable standards 25 22

The average size of classrooms is 875 s.f. compared to 900 s.f. recommended by the OSDM.

5.2 Classroom space permits arrangements for small group activity 15 13

The classrooms are large enough to allow for affective small group activity, but smaller than OSDM recommendations.

5.3 Location of academic learning areas is near related educational activities and away from disruptive noise 10 0

The location of the gym, music, cafeteria and classrooms is not adequately separated. The open classroom design has disruptive noise present.

5.4 Personal space in the classroom away from group instruction allows privacy time for individual students 10 0

No designated personal space is present.

5.5 Storage for student materials is adequate 10 2

Some small cubby areas are available for the storage of elementary student supplies, but are not available for all students.

5.6 Storage for teacher materials is adequate 10 4

Little casework is provided for teacher material storage. Condition is fair.

Special Learning Space Points Allocated Points

5.7 Size of special learning area(s) meets standards 15 13

The average size of special education areas is smaller than that recommended by the OSDM.

5.8 Design of specialized learning area(s) is compatible with instructional need 10 3

Very few special education provisions are made. Special education classrooms are similar to standard classrooms.

5.9 Library/Resource/Media Center provides appropriate and attractive space 10 4

Light levels were lower than OSDM recommendations. Furnishings were attractive. Open to noise from other areas.

5.10 Gymnasium (or covered P.E. area) adequately serves physical education instruction 5 3

The existing gym is 3,343 s.f. compared to 3,500 s.f. recommended by the OSDM.

5.11 ES Pre-kindergarten and kindergarten space is appropriate for age of students and nature of instruction 10 8

MS/HS Science program is provided sufficient space and equipment

The average size of kindergarten classrooms is 1,260 s.f. compared to 1,200 s.f. recommended by the OSDM. Toilet room is not ADA accessible.



43/49

5.12 Music Program is provided adequate sound treated space 5 2

The size of the music room is much less than the OSDM recommendation. Sound treatment is fair.

5.13 Space for art is appropriate for special instruction, supplies, and equipment 5 5

The size of the art room meets the OSDM recommendation. Equipment is in good to fair condition.

School Facility Appraisal Points Allocated Points

5.14 Space for technology education permits use of state-of-the-art equipment 5 3

Computer labs are too small for proper arrangement of stations.

5.15 Space for small groups and remedial instruction is provided adjacent to classrooms 5 2

Small project rooms for individual instruction are located near classrooms.

5.16 Storage for student and teacher material is adequate 5 2

Cubby areas are available for the storage of elementary student supplies. Little casework is provided for teacher material storage. Condition is fair.

Support Space Points Allocated Points

5.17 Teachers lounge and work areas reflect teachers as professionals 10 3

Teachers lounge is small with dated furnishings and finishes. Toilets are not accessible.

5.18 Cafeteria/Kitchen is attractive with sufficient space for seating/dining, delivery, storage, and food preparation 10 6

The kitchen is significantly smaller than OSDM standards. The size is less than the size recommended by the OSDM. The finishes are fair.

5.19 Administrative offices provided are consistent in appearance and function with the maturity of the students served 5 1

Office furnishings are mismatched and are not consistent in appearance. The layout is not conducive to the function intended.

5.20 Counselors office insures privacy and sufficient storage 5 2

Counselor has private office with little storage space.

5.21 Clinic is near administrative offices and is equipped to meet requirements 5 2

Clinic is equipped with two cots. Location is near offices. Toilet is not ADA accessible.

5.22 Suitable reception space is available for students, teachers, and visitors 5 1

Reception space is too small to adequately serve the need.

5.23 Administrative personnel are provided sufficient work space and privacy 5 1

Administrative area is small and does not contain all OSDM elements.

TOTAL - Educational Adequacy 200 102




44/49

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

6.0 Environment for Education


Exterior Environment Points Allocated Points

6.1 Overall design is aesthetically pleasing to age of students 15 7

Open concept design lacks appropriate windows.

6.2 Site and building are well landscaped 10 9

The landscaping is mature and well placed.

6.3 Exterior noise and poor environment do not disrupt learning 10 10

The surrounding neighborhood is a residential type.

6.4 Entrances and walkways are sheltered from sun and inclement weather 10 7

The main entrance is sheltered, but some of the secondary entrances are not.

6.5 Building materials provide attractive color and texture 5 2

The open concept structure is mostly brick without windows breaking up the area.

Interior Environment Points Allocated Points

6.6 Color schemes, building materials, and decor provide an impetus to learning 20 14

Color schemes are of quality finish and somewhat consistent.

6.7 Year around comfortable temperature and humidity are provided throughout the building 15 12

The facility was originally constructed with heating and cooling systems which provided a year round comfortable environment. Some cooling units no longerfunction.

6.8 Ventilating system provides adequate quiet circulation of clean air and meets 15cfm VBCrequirement

15 12

The existing ventilation system does not provide the code required amount of fresh air.

6.9 Lighting system provides proper intensity, diffusion, and distribution of illumination 15 5

Light fixtures appeared to be well maintained. Light levels were lower than OSDM recommendations in various locations.

6.10 Drinking fountains and restroom facilities are conveniently located 15 8

The O.B.C. requires one drinking fountain per 100 students. The building capacity requires 6 drinking fountains. The existing facility has 6 drinking fountains. ADArequires that 50 percent of drinking fountains be accessible. One of the drinking fountains is accessible. Bubblers are provided in classrooms to fulfill overallrequirements, but are not ADA accessible. The O.B.C. requires that restrooms be located on every floor and that the maximum travel distance shall not exceed 500feet. The facility meets the requirement. The size of public restrooms is such that ADA access is achievable. The size of individual restrooms is such that ADAaccess is not possible.

6.11 Communication among students is enhanced by commons area(s) for socialization 10 6



45/49

No common area exists, but open classroom design allows for greater socialization.

6.12 Traffic flow is aided by appropriate foyers and corridors 10 3

Open design is confusing for traffic flow.

6.13 Areas for students to interact are suitable to the age group 10 6

Cafeteria, gymnasium and media center provide a suitable interaction space.

6.14 Large group areas are designed for effective management of students 10 10

Large group areas provided with a sound system. There are no blind spots where supervision is limited.

6.15 Acoustical treatment of ceilings, walls, and floors provides effective sound control 10 3

Lay-in acoustic ceilings and carpet flooring provide fair acoustics. No partition walls allow noise transfer. Gym open structure with tectum deck, masonry walls, andwood floor provide fair acoustics.

6.16 Window design contributes to a pleasant environment 10 4

Windows are smaller than the OSDM recommended area. Windows are not available in all areas where OSDM recommends them.

6.17 Furniture and equipment provide a pleasing atmosphere 10 7

The existing facility lacked some of the recommended equipment per OSDM standards. The equipment appeared to be mismatched and was in fair condition. Theequipment appeared clean and well maintained.

TOTAL - Environment for Education 200 125




46/49

Justification for Allocation of Points

Building Name and Level: Sherwood Elem

K-6

Building features that clearly exceed criteria:

1. 20 acre site.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Building features that are non-existent or very inadequate:

1. Some HVAC components not functional.

2. No windows in classroom area.

3. Non-compl iant fire alarm.

4. Not completely ADA accessible.

5. No sprinkler system.

6. Asbestos present.


Report Generated at 2 May 2005 15:Justification for Allocation of Points Page 46


47/49


Building Summary - Sherwood Elem (61937)


Name: Sherwood Elem


Cincinnati,OH 45230

Bldg. IRN: 61937



Phone: 513-231-7565










Total 55,805



=2 Needs Repair




DollarAssessment C





F. Windows 3 $48,670.00 -








N. Fire Alarm 3 $83,707.50 -







U. Life Safety 3 $191,366.25 -


W. Technology 3 $321,994.85 -


- $996,659.85 -

Total $5,092,410.05









Commentary


C=Under Contract




Previous Page



48/49

Environmental Hazards - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Sherwood Elem (61937) - Original Building

Environmental Hazards - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Sherwood Elem (61937) - Original Building

Owner: Forest Hills Local SD Bldg. IRN: 61937

Facility: Sherwood Elem BuildingAdd: Original Building

Date: 2004-07-13 Assessor: Tony Zircher

A. Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) AFM=Asbestos Free Materia

ACM Found Status Quantity Unit Cost Estimated Cost

1. Boiler/Furnace/Breeching Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $15.00 $0.002. Tank/Duct Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $12.00 $0.00

3. Pipe Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $8.00 $0.004. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $25.00 $0.00

5. Acoustical Plaster Removal Not Present 0 $7.00 $0.006. Fireproofing Removal Not Present 0 $20.00 $0.00

7. Hard Plaster Removal Not Present 0 $10.00 $0.008. Gypsum Board Removal Not Present 0 $6.00 $0.00

9. Acoustical Panel Ceiling Removal Not Present 0 $3.00 $0.0010. Resilient Flooring Removal - Incl. Mastic Reported Asbestos-Containing Material 440 $3.00 $1,320.00

11. Roofing Removal Not Present 0 $2.00 $0.0011 Sum of lines(1-11) Total Abs. Hazard Abatement Cost for Renovation Work $1,320.00

12 Sum of lines(1-9) Total Abs. Hazard Abatement Cost for Demolition Work $0.00

B. Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks None Reported

Tank No. Location Age Product Stored Size Est.Rem.Cost

1 Sum Of Lines(1-0) Total Cost For Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks $0.00

C. Lead-Based Paint (LBP) - Renovation Only Addition Constructed after 19801. Estimated Cost For Abatement Contractor to Perform Lead Mock-Ups $5,000.002. Special Engineering Fees $5,000.00

3 Sum of lines(1-2) Total Cost for Lead-Based Paint Mock-Ups $10,000.00

D. Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Recycling/Incineration Not ApplicableArea Of Building Addition Square Feet w/Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Unit Cost Total Cost

1 52700 52700 $0.05 $2,635.00

E. Other Environmental Hazards/Remarks None ReportedDescription Cost Estimate

1. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards $0.00

F. Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimate Summaries1. A11, B1, C3, D1, and E1 Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Renovation $13,955.00

2. A12, B1, D1, and E1 Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Demolition $2,635.00

Report Generated at 2 May 2005 15: Page 48


49/49

Environmental Hazards - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Sherwood Elem (61937) - Classroom Addition

Environmental Hazards - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Sherwood Elem (61937) - Classroom Addition

Owner: Forest Hills Local SD Bldg. IRN: 61937

Facility: Sherwood Elem BuildingAdd: Classroom Addition

Date: 2004-07-21 Assessor: Tony Zircher

A. Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) AFM=Asbestos Free Materia

ACM Found Status Quantity Unit Cost Estimated Cost

1. Boiler/Furnace/Breeching Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $15.00 $0.002. Tank/Duct Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $12.00 $0.00

3. Pipe Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $8.00 $0.004. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal Not Present

state assessment, sherwood

Documents