chemical durability of glasslib3.dss.go.th/fulltext/glass/web/web_dr_kanit/cu_glass_course... ·...
TRANSCRIPT
CHEMICAL DURABILITYOF GLASSReinhard Conradt
Department of Mineral Engineering, RWTH Aachen Univbersity, Germany
CU BKK 2010
Department of Materials Science, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University&
Department of Science ServiceBangkok 14th September 2010
AQUEOUS SYSTEMS•Pourbaix: Atlas of Electrochemical Equilibria in Aqueous Solutions aq. pH-Eh speciation of the entire periodic table of elements• Iler: The Chemistry of Silica (1979) more than 2600 references!• Baes & Mesmer: The thermodynamics of cation hydrolysis (1981)• Brinker & Scherer: Sol-Gel Science (1990)• H.E. Bergna: The colloid Chemistry of Silica (1994)• G. Sposito: The Environmental Chemistry fo Alumina (1996)
AQUEOUS SYSTEMS•Pourbaix: Atlas of Electrochemical Equilibria in Aqueous Solutions aq. pH-Eh speciation of the entire periodic table of elements• Iler: The Chemistry of Silica (1979) more than 2600 references!• Baes & Mesmer: The thermodynamics of cation hydrolysis (1981)• Brinker & Scherer: Sol-Gel Science (1990)• H.E. Bergna: The colloid Chemistry of Silica (1994)• G. Sposito: The Environmental Chemistry fo Alumina (1996)
GLASS CORROSION• ICG compilation of literature (1972) almost 1000 references!• Holland (1964)• Besborodow (1972)• Clark, Pantano & Hench (1979)• Doremus & Tomozawa (1977-82)• Scholze (1964-91)• Paul (1982)• Clark & Zoitos (1992)
to be analyzed
dissolve soluble residue
HCl group residue
residue
residue
residue
residue
H2S group
(NH4)2S group
(NH4)2CO3 group
soluble group
add HCl
add H2S
add (NH4)2S
add (NH4)2CO3
filtrate
filtrate
filtrate
filtrate
filtrate
filter
Ag, Hg1+, Pb, W, Nb, Ta
Hg, Pb, Bi, Cu, Cd
As, Sb, Sn (after treating filtrate with HCl)
Zn, Mn, Fe2+, Cr, Al; Co, Ni
Ba, Ca, Sr
Na, K, Mg, Li, NH4
desintegration filter
filter
filter
filter
residue
urotropine group: Fe3+, Cr, Al, Be, Ti, ...
(dissolve by HAc; precipitate as BaCrO4 , SrSO4 , CaC2O4 )
(compare to sea water: Na-K-Mg-Cl-SO4-H2O)
network dissolution(q ∝ t)
SiO2+ H2O = H4SiO4
≡Si-O-Si≡ + H2O→ 2 ≡Si-OH
ion exchange zone bulk glass
v
DH+ Na+
glass surface at t = 0
tb·a·t q +=
mas
s lo
ss p
er s
urfa
ce a
rea
q
t ime t
t q ∝
t∝ q
leaching(q ∝ √t)
≡Si-O-Na+(gl) + H+(aq)→≡Si-OH(gl) + Na+(aq)or≡Si-O-Na+(gl) + H3O+(aq)→≡Si-OH(gl) + H2O(gl) + Na+(aq)
standard model
mass loss&
pH increase
vertical differentiation:
lateral differentiation: emerging surface roughness
local swelling
lateral diffusion zones
crystallization
pitting
after: E. Rädlein
surface zone
bulk glass
adsorbed layermineralized glass,amorphous and crystalline precipitates,„back precipitates“, „transformed layer“
aqueous solution,dissolved glass
components
aqueous system residual glass
pH
log
q
ISO 1776:<0.7 / ..... / >15 mg/dm²
ISO 695:< 75 / ..... / >175 mg/dm²
ISO 719:< 0.1 / ..... / > 3.5 ml 0.01 m HCl
designed for the family of conventional silicate glasses
ISO standard tests:
ISO 1776 (stability against acidic attack)area ≈ 300 cm²; boil in 6 m HCl (1.5 l) for 6 h ⇒ <0.7 / 1.5 / 15 / >15 mg/dm²
ISO 695 (stability against alkaline attack)area 10=15 cm²; boil in 1 m NaOH + 1 m Na2CO3 (0.8 l) for 3 h ; ⇒ <75 / 175 / >175 mg/dm²
ISO 719 (stability against hydrolytic attack)powder 315-500 µm (4x 2 g); expose to 30 ml water in 50 ml flaskat 98 °C for 1 h; cool down; fill to 50 ml; titrate 25 ml aliquots by 0.01 m HCl ⇒ <0.1 / 0.2 / 0.85 / 2 / 3.5 ml HCl per g glass
ISO 720 (stability against hydrothermal attack)powder 300-420 µm (4x 10 g); expose to 50 ml water in 10 ml flaskat 121 °C for 0.5 h; cool down; fill to 10 ml; titrate by 0.02 m H2SO4 ⇒ <0.1 / 0.85 / 1.5 ml H2SO4 per g glass
sample holder (PE)
wide neck PE-bottle
glass chip
filling level
PE sample holderwide neck PE bottle
filling level
glass chip
solution:pH (free, buffered compensated);salts (e.g., 9 g/l NaCl);organics;redox (e.g., FeCl2/FeCl3)
temperature:37±1 or 98±1 °C
s parameter:0.1 cm-1
time intervals:0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 hours;1, 3, 7, 14, 28, 60, 120, ... days
similar procedures: see MCC-1, MCC-2 tests
*)
*) no „natural“ reference solution for corrosion experiments
sample holder (PE)
wide neck PE-bottle
glass chip
filling level
PE sample holderwide neck PE bottle
filling level
glass chip
solution:pH (free, buffered compensated);salts (e.g., 9 g/l NaCl);organics;redox (e.g., FeCl2/FeCl3)
temperature:37±1 or 98±1 °C
s parameter:0.1 cm-1
time intervals:0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 hours;1, 3, 7, 14, 28, 60, 120, ... days
similar procedures: see MCC-1, MCC-2 tests
*)
*) no „natural“ reference solution for corrosion experiments
±5 K temperature errormake up for
± 40 % error in mass loss
RIE OC TR
oxide compositionSiO2 60.20 72.50 69.30ZrO2 - - 1.50TiO2 - - 0.60Al2O3 1.00 1.00 1.00B2O3 0.70 - -MgO - 4.11 -CaO - 7.10 4.90ZnO - - 2.30PbO 24.60 - -Na2O 5.30 14.10 9.10K2O 8.70 - 10.00sum 100.50 98.81 98.70
constitutional composition2ZnO·SiO2 - - 3.16ZrO2·SiO2 - - 0.90CaO·TiO2 - - 2.56PbO·SiO2 31.35 - -K2O·Al2O3·6SiO2 0.55 - 5.05K2O·2SiO2 19.67 - 20.88Na2O·Al2O3·6SiO2 - 7.26 5.56B2O3 0.70 - -MgO·SiO2 - 10.32 -Na2O·2SiO2 15.64 31.50 20.72Na2O·3CaO·6SiO2 - 25.13 13.55SiO2 32.10 25.80 27.63sum 100.00 100.00 100.00
0 20 40 60 80 1000.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
full: midhalf open: edge
OC
TR
RIE
communal water
q·s
in m
g/cm
³
t in d
0 20 40 60 80 100
red: TRblue: RIEblack: OC
edge
mid
DI water
t in d
g = TRg = RIEg = OC
0 20 40 60 80 1000.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Rand
Mitte
RIE
OC
TR
Spülmittel A
q·s
in m
g/cm
³
t in d
0 20 40 60 80 100
RIE
Rand
Mitte
OC
TR
Spülmittel B
t in d
0 20 40 60 80 100
rot: TRblau: RIEschwarz: OC
Spülmittel C
t in d
g = TRg = RIEg = OC
detergent A detergent B detergent Cedge
mid
H2O dest. → rapid change of pH takes place(specified by el. conductivity)
buffered solutions → may interfere with the corrosion mechanism
special corrosion media → for specific corrosion scenarios, e.g.,- salt brines „Q“, „R“, ...;- granitic or clay waters;- simulated physiological fluids (9 g/l NaCl, Gamble‘s solution, ...)- water with dish washing agents
water pre-saturated with glass powder
Peq
Peq
TT
heater & magnetic stirrer
pre-saturation corrosion test under saturation conditions
example:how to perform a corrosion testunder conditions „close to saturation“
citrate bufferspH C6H8O7·H2O [g] NaCl [g] Zusatz *) [ml] 2 6.43 3.58 8.2 HCl 3 8.47 3.49 20.6 NaOH 4 11.75 2.57 68.0 NaOH 5 20.26 - 196.4 NaOH 6 12.53 - 159.6 NaOH*) concentration 1 mol/l
example: buffered solutions
Is a buffered constant pH solutiona good reference medium for corrosion tests?
020406080
100
Al(OH)2- Al(OH)4
-
Al(OH)3, amAl3+
020406080
100
Al(OH)2+
Al(OH)3, aq
Al(OH)4
-Al(OH)2
+Al3+
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140
20406080
100
rela
tive
conc
entra
tion
of a
queo
us A
l spe
cies
in %
Al(LH*)25-
AlL2H*4-
AlL23-
Al(HL)L2-
AlL
AlHL+
Al3+
pH
+ citric acid
∞ diluted
rel c
once
ntra
tion
of A
l spe
cies
in %
NO WAY!Citrate buffers, for example, destablize the otherwise very stable alumina.Thus, very corrosion resistant glasses may appear to be very weak in asolution buffered with a citrate buffer.
surface pre-treatment:
• cut by a low-speed saw in petroleum;
• cut, ground, polished, etched in HF-HNO3
• as received from the production process
• fire polished
• blown glass foils
etc. etc.
network dissolution(q ∝ t)
SiO2+ H2O = H4SiO4
≡Si-O-Si≡ + H2O→ 2 ≡Si-OH
ion exchange zone bulk glass
v
DH+ Na+
glass surface at t = 0
leaching(q ∝ √t)
≡Si-O-Na+(gl) + H+(aq)→ ≡Si-OH(gl) + Na+(aq)
standard model
The conclusion
„the network modifiers are leached preferentially, the network formers are left behind asa scaffold dissolving slowly“ is misleading.
The covalent / ionic nature of the metal-oxygen bond has almost nothing to do with its stabilityagainst aqueous attack. Think of Si-O vs. P-O! Think of pure P2O5 vs. natural bones.How would a MgO-B2O3 glass behave?
misleading view:network modifiers are depleted,network formers are enriched
correct view:an incongruent dissolutionprocess takess place;the glass components areenriched or depleted accordingto their solubility in the aqueoussystem
old paradigm:network modifiers are depleted,network formers are enriched
new paradigm:incongruent dissolutionaccording to the solubilityof individual oxides
0 20 40 60 80 1000.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
15 min in D2O at 85 °C
22Na+2D+
rela
tive
conc
entr
atio
n
depth in nm
0 20 40 60 80 1000.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
15 min in D2O at 85 °C
22Na+2D+
rela
tive
conc
entr
atio
n
depth in nm
condensed layer
gel layer
70 50 50 40 30 20 10 0 Al2O3 + Fe2O3 + other oxides
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
SiO2
10
20
30
40
50
60
Na2 O + B
2 O3
30
0
70
0.014.5
4.50.020.002
Si loss inmg/(cm2·d)
28 d,90 °C,D.I. H2O,s = 0.1 cm-1
corrosion resistance =
ƒ(thermodynamic stability, layer formation, passivation)
Let us learn from metallurgy:
the elementary process of metal corrosion iselectron transfer (redox reactions):
2Fe0 → 2Fe2+ + 4e-
O2 + 4e- → 2O2-
___________________________________2Fe0 + O2 → 2FeO
2Fe0 → 2Fe2+ + 4e-
2H2O + 4e- → 2H2 + 4 OH-
_________________________________________2Fe0 + 2H2O → 2Fe(OH)2(aq) + 2H2
2Fe0 → 2Fe2+ + 4e-
O2 + 4e- → 2O2-
___________________________________2Fe0 + O2 → 2FeO(slag)
metals
in air
in water
in a slag
0 300 600 900 1200-1200
-1100
-1000
-900
-800
-700
-600
-500
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
4/3 Cr + O2 = 2/3 Cr2O3
4/3 Al + O2 = 2/3 Al2O3Si + O2 = SiO2
2 H2 + O2 = 2 H2O
2 CO + O2 = 2 CO2
6 FeO + O2 = 2 Fe3O4
4 Fe3O4 + O2 = 6 Fe2O3
∆G in kJ per mol O2
°C
-28
-24
-20
-16
-12
-8
-4
0
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
-2
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
log [CO]/CO2]log [H2]/[H2O] log [O2]
protective oxide scale:
Al2O3
Cr2O3
Fe2O3
Cr-rich steel
O2
Al
protective oxide scale:
Fe
non-protective oxide scale:
The layer must
• be an effective diffusion barrier• adhere well to the metal• passivate the metal (forestall the e- transfer)
0
50
100
0
50
100
00
50
100
0
[SiO
2][S
iO2]
[SiO
2]
distance to original surface distance to original surface
Type I: „inert“ glass Type II: protective SiO2 layer
Type IIIa: multicomponent protective layer
Type IIIb: passi-vating layer
Type IV: non-protective layer
Typ V:soluble glass
SiO2, Al2O3, TiO2, ZrO2,Nb2O5, etc.
Zn(OH)2, Fe(OH)3, etc.
example: Na2O-CaO-SiO2 glass, glasses rich in SiO2
example: silica glass
example: soft silica glasses example: Na2Si2O5 glasss
L.L. Hench
The layer must
• be an effective diffusion barrier• adhere well to the residual glass• passivate the glass (forestall the H+ transfer)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-1.0
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
0
-11.6
-21.6
-31.6
-38.6
-41.6log [H2] =
-83.1
-60
-40
-20
-6
0
log [O2] =
2H2 = 4H + + 4e -
2H2O = O2 + 4H + + 4e -
2H2O
= 2
H 2 +
O2 ;
Gf =
474
.360
kJ/
mol
; Kf =
7.8
·10-8
4
H2O = H+ + OH- ; Gw = 79.880 kJ/mol; K w =1.0·10-14
Eh in
Vol
t
pH
surface water
reference state fo the Gibbs energies of formationof all species in the state (aq)
species -Gƒe (kJ/mol)
H2O(l) 237.180H+(aq) 0.000H2O – OH–(aq) =H+(aq) 79.880OH–(aq) 157.300HO2–(aq) 67.362H2O2(l) 134.097H2(aq) -17.573O2(aq) -16.318H2(g) 0.000O2(g) 0.000
The state „dissolved in water“ is a statelike the states „solid“, „liquid“, and „gas“. It is denoted by (aq).
Spezies -Gƒe (kJ/mol) Spezies -Gƒ
e (kJ/mol)
CO2(g) 394.570 F2(g) 0.000CO2(aq) 386.016 F– 279.993HCO3
– 586.848 HF(aq) 298.110CO3
2– 527.895 HF2– 581.492
SiO2(s) 854.910 P2O5(s) 1349.570SiO2(aq) 1307.760 H3PO4(aq) 1142.650H3SiO4
– 1251.990 H2PO4– 1130.391
H2SiO42– 1185.460 HPO4
2– 1089.263HSiO 4
3– 1116.547 PO43– 1018.804
SiO44– 1048.230 H4P2O7(aq) 2032.160
H6[H2SiO4]42– 5153.236 H3P2O7– 2026.830
H4[H2SiO4]44– 5025.951 H2P2O72– 2003.410
HSiO 3– 1005.46 HP2O7
3– 1961.710SiO3
2– 938.51 P2O74– 1919.200
H5P3O10(aq) 2921.670Al2O3(s) 1583.150 H4P3O10
– 2923.190Al3+ 492.000 H3P3O10
2– 2917.480Al(OH)2+ 700.653 H2P3O10
3– 2094.550Al(OH)2
+ 907.384 HP3O104– 2872.550
Al(OH)3(aq) 1111.061 P3O105– 2821.490
Al(OH)3(am) 1137.630Al(OH)4
– 1305.410 B2O3 1194.270H3BO3(aq) 968.638
Fe2O3(s) 739.960 H2BO3– 917.564
Fe3+ 17.866 HBO32– 845.695
FeOH2+ 240.413 BO33– 769.182
Fe(OH)2+ 457.228Fe(OH)3(aq) 670.695 TiO2 889.940Fe(OH)3(s) 696.636 TiO2+ 577.392Fe(OH)4– 841.821 TiO2OH– 467.353
TiO(OH)2 s 1058.552FeO 250.990Fe2+ 92.257 ZrO2 1036.870FeOH+ 279.951 Zr4+ 594.128Fe(OH)2(aq) 457.102 ZrO2+ 843.076Fe(OH)2(s) 486.599 ZrO2OH– 1203.737Fe(OH)3– 619.232 ZrO(OH)2 s 1303.316
Spezies -Gƒe (kJ/mol) Spezies -Gƒ
e (kJ/mol)
MgO(s) 569.840 PbO(s) 188.489Mg2+ 455.261 Pb2+ 24.393MgOH+ 638.064 PbOH+ 226.354Mg(OH)2(aq) 769.438 Pb(OH)2(aq) 400.827Mg(OH)2(s) 833.746 Pb(OH)3– 575.718MgCO3(aq) 1002.486MgCO3(s) 1012.110 BaO(s) 528.690MgHCO3
– 1050.602 Ba2+ 547.518
CaO(s) 604.460 Li2O(s) 561.760Ca2+ 552.706 Li+ 292.629CaOH+ 716.970Ca(OH)2(aq) 868.138 Na2O(s) 376.740Ca(OH)2(s) 897.008 Na+ 262.211CaCO3(aq) 1081.438CaCO3(s) 1128.760 K2O(s) 322.200CaHCO3
– 1145.035 K + 282.671
SrO(s) 562.680 Cs2O(s) 308.300Sr2+ 571.451 Cs+ 292.001SrOH+ 733.455Sr(OH)2(aq) 871.109 Nd2O3(s) 1721.700Sr(OH)2(s) 881.987 Nd3+ 671.532SrCO2(aq) 1087.338 Nd2(OH)2
4+ 1738.230SrCO3(s) 1140.140 Nd(OH)2+ 863.126
Nd(OH)3(s) 1259.221MnO(s) 363.340 Nd(OH)4
– 1407.096Mn2+ 229.953MnOH+ 406.685 MoO3(s) 655.778Mn(OH)2(s) 615.048 MoO2
2+ 411.287Mn(OH)3– 746.426 MoO2(OH)+ 645.884
H2MoO4(aq) 877.134ZnO(s) 318.470 HMoO4
– 866.632Zn2+ 147.193 MoO4
2– 838.055ZnOH+ 333.256Zn(OH)2(aq) 535.385 Nb2O5(s) 1765.82Zn(OH)3– 704.711 Nb(OH)5(aq) 1448.50Zn(OH)42– 871.276 NbO3
– 932.20
Spezies -Gƒe (kJ/mol) Spezies -Gƒ
e (kJ/mol)
CO2(g) 394.570 F2(g) 0.000CO2(aq) 386.016 F– 279.993HCO3
– 586.848 HF(aq) 298.110CO3
2– 527.895 HF2– 581.492
SiO2(s) 854.910 P2O5(s) 1349.570SiO2(aq) 1307.760 H3PO4(aq) 1142.650H3SiO4
– 1251.990 H2PO4– 1130.391
H2SiO42– 1185.460 HPO4
2– 1089.263HSiO 4
3– 1116.547 PO43– 1018.804
SiO44– 1048.230 H4P2O7(aq) 2032.160
H6[H2SiO4]42– 5153.236 H3P2O7– 2026.830
H4[H2SiO4]44– 5025.951 H2P2O72– 2003.410
HSiO 3– 1005.46 HP2O7
3– 1961.710SiO3
2– 938.51 P2O74– 1919.200
H5P3O10(aq) 2921.670Al2O3(s) 1583.150 H4P3O10
– 2923.190Al3+ 492.000 H3P3O10
2– 2917.480Al(OH)2+ 700.653 H2P3O10
3– 2094.550Al(OH)2
+ 907.384 HP3O104– 2872.550
Al(OH)3(aq) 1111.061 P3O105– 2821.490
Al(OH)3(am) 1137.630Al(OH)4
– 1305.410 B2O3 1194.270H3BO3(aq) 968.638
Fe2O3(s) 739.960 H2BO3– 917.564
Fe3+ 17.866 HBO32– 845.695
FeOH2+ 240.413 BO33– 769.182
Fe(OH)2+ 457.228Fe(OH)3(aq) 670.695 TiO2 889.940Fe(OH)3(s) 696.636 TiO2+ 577.392Fe(OH)4– 841.821 TiO2OH– 467.353
TiO(OH)2 s 1058.552FeO 250.990Fe2+ 92.257 ZrO2 1036.870FeOH+ 279.951 Zr4+ 594.128Fe(OH)2(aq) 457.102 ZrO2+ 843.076Fe(OH)2(s) 486.599 ZrO2OH– 1203.737Fe(OH)3– 619.232 ZrO(OH)2 s 1303.316
Spezies -Gƒe (kJ/mol) Spezies -Gƒ
e (kJ/mol)
MgO(s) 569.840 PbO(s) 188.489Mg2+ 455.261 Pb2+ 24.393MgOH+ 638.064 PbOH+ 226.354Mg(OH)2(aq) 769.438 Pb(OH)2(aq) 400.827Mg(OH)2(s) 833.746 Pb(OH)3– 575.718MgCO3(aq) 1002.486MgCO3(s) 1012.110 BaO(s) 528.690MgHCO3
– 1050.602 Ba2+ 547.518
CaO(s) 604.460 Li2O(s) 561.760Ca2+ 552.706 Li+ 292.629CaOH+ 716.970Ca(OH)2(aq) 868.138 Na2O(s) 376.740Ca(OH)2(s) 897.008 Na+ 262.211CaCO3(aq) 1081.438CaCO3(s) 1128.760 K2O(s) 322.200CaHCO3
– 1145.035 K + 282.671
SrO(s) 562.680 Cs2O(s) 308.300Sr2+ 571.451 Cs+ 292.001SrOH+ 733.455Sr(OH)2(aq) 871.109 Nd2O3(s) 1721.700Sr(OH)2(s) 881.987 Nd3+ 671.532SrCO2(aq) 1087.338 Nd2(OH)2
4+ 1738.230SrCO3(s) 1140.140 Nd(OH)2+ 863.126
Nd(OH)3(s) 1259.221MnO(s) 363.340 Nd(OH)4
– 1407.096Mn2+ 229.953MnOH+ 406.685 MoO3(s) 655.778Mn(OH)2(s) 615.048 MoO2
2+ 411.287Mn(OH)3– 746.426 MoO2(OH)+ 645.884
H2MoO4(aq) 877.134ZnO(s) 318.470 HMoO4
– 866.632Zn2+ 147.193 MoO4
2– 838.055ZnOH+ 333.256Zn(OH)2(aq) 535.385 Nb2O5(s) 1765.82Zn(OH)3– 704.711 Nb(OH)5(aq) 1448.50Zn(OH)42– 871.276 NbO3
– 932.20
Al2O3(s) 1583.150Al3+ 492.000Al(OH)2+ 700.653Al(OH)2
+ 907.384Al(OH)3(aq) 1111.061Al(OH)3(am) 1137.630Al(OH)4
– 1305.410
Al2O3 + 6 H+ → 2 Al3+ + 3 H2O+ 4 H+ → 2 AlOH2+ + H2O+ 2 H+ + H2O → 2 Al(OH)2+
+ 3 H2O → 2 Al(OH)3
+ 5 H2O → 2 Al(OH)4- + 2 H+
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140
20
40
60
80
100
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
Al(OH)4-
Al(OH)3(am)Al3+
mol
ar fr
actio
n of
spe
cies
in %
pH
Al2O3
-∆G
° hyd
r in k
J/m
olpH
Al(OH)2+
Al2O3(s)
Al(OH)3(aq)
Al(OH)4-
Al(OH)3(am)
AlOH2+
Al3+
log
activ
ity
pH
pHn
Ka
OHHOAla
K
iOHmHnOAl
ii
mni
i
⋅−=
⋅⋅=
↔⋅+⋅+
+
+
2·log
21
log
][][][
·2
232
2
232
i
a
a
i
xspecies
xi
i
⋅=
=∑
100 %
1010
log
log
∑ ⋅⋅−
=∆−
ii
ohydr
KxRT
OAlG
ln
)( 32
020406080
100
Al(OH)2- Al(OH)4
-
Al(OH)3, amAl3+
020406080
100
Al(OH)2+
Al(OH)3, aq
Al(OH)4
-Al(OH)2
+Al3+
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140
20406080
100
rela
tive
conc
entra
tion
of a
queo
us A
l spe
cies
in %
Al(LH*)25-
AlL2H*4-
AlL23-
Al(HL)L2-
AlL
AlHL+
Al3+
pH
concentration↑
+ C6H8O7
∞ diluted
C6H8O7 =
- - -
Al3+
6 8 10 12 140.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
mol
ar fr
actio
n of
sce
cies
pH
02SiO
-43SiOH -4
4SiO
-242SiOH
-34HSiO
pH = 9.8 = 11.9
6 8 10 12 140.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
mol
ar fr
actio
n of
sce
cies
pH
02SiO
-43SiOH
( ) -44424 SiOHH
( ) -24426 SiOHH
-44SiO
-242SiOH
-34HSiO
pH = 9.8 = 11.4
*) Iler 1979; s.a. Roggendorf 2007
*)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
0
50
100
150
200
250
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
SrO
PbOZnO
FeO
MnO
MgO
CaO
BaO
pH
Al2O3
B2O3
MoO3
SiO2
Fe2O3
-∆G
hydr
in k
J/m
ol
pH
The state „dissolved in water“ is a statelike the states „solid“, „liquid“, and „gas“. It is denoted by (aq).SiO2(aq) = silica dissolved in water.
We may a glass like a „state“ - althoughit is not an equilibrium state like:SiO2(gl) = silica glass.
Let us discuss a glass like[74SiO2 + 10CaO + 16 Na2O](gl)
What state corresponds to[74SiO2 + 10CaO + 16 Na2O](aq) ?
Gib
bs e
nerg
y
∆GhydrGvit
∆Ggl∆Gaq∆Gs
Gaq
Gs
Ggl
Gox
hydr
vit
s
aq
?Gspecies aqueoussolution aqueous (4) glass
G compounds ium equilibr(3) glass
?G oxides compounds ibrium(2) equil?Gsolution aqueous species aqueous oxides
species aqueoussolution aqueous s(1) oxide
⇒→+−⇒→
−⇒→⇒−→=→+
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
0
10
20
30
40
50∆G
hydr in
kJ
per 1
00 g
gla
ss
pH
Duran, Pyrex
float glass
E glassbasalt glass
stability fingerprints of different glasses
glass
How to model the reaction path
[composition](gl) → [composition](aq) ?
• A slice of glass is brought to equilibrium with the solution.• The the next glass slice is added and brought to equilibrium.• The time scale is replaced by a sequence of glass slices.• We learn towards what state the corrosin process moves.
-5.0 -4.5 -4.0 -3.5 -3.0-5.0
-4.5
-4.0
-3.5
-3.0
9.0
9.5
10.0
10.5
11.0
-5.0 -4.5 -4.0 -3.5 -3.0-10
-9
-8
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
SiO2 tu
rnove
r ξ
Ca(aq)Si(aq)
Na+H+
log
c, c
in m
ol/l
log ξ(SiO2), ξ in mol/l
pH
log
c, c
in m
ol/l
CaO·2SiO2·2H2O
SiO 2 turnover ξ
Si in SiO2(am)
Ca(aq)
Si(aq)
log ξ(SiO2), ξ in mol/l
surface zone
bulk glass
adsorbed layermineralized glass,amorphous and crystalline precipitates,„back precipitates“, „transformed layer“
aqueous solution,dissolved glass
components
aqueous system residual glass
reaction product layer(vertical section);
surface of the residualglass after removal ofthe reaction productlayer(top view)
100 µm
0.01 0.10 20 40 60 80 100
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
NS glass +dissolved water
molar fraction of H2O
NS + steam
NS + NSH6
NS + NSH5
ice + L NSH6 + NSH9
L + NSH9
ice + NSH9NSH5 + NSH6
NS + NSH5L + NSH6
NS + NSH6
solution L
NS + steam
Na2SiO3 = NSH2O = H
T in
°C
wt. % Na2SiO3
glass dissolved in water water dissolved in glass
0.01 0.10 20 40 60 80 100
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
NS glass +dissolved water
molar fraction of H2O
NS + steam
NS + NSH6
NS + NSH5
ice + L NSH6 + NSH9
L + NSH9
ice + NSH9NSH5 + NSH6
NS + NSH5L + NSH6
NS + NSH6
solution L
NS + steam
Na2SiO3 = NSH2O = H
T in
°C
wt. % Na2SiO3
glass dissolved in water water dissolved in glass
every reaction pathyields a final cristalline
phase
a
b
G. Malow, W. Lutze, R.C. Ewing;
Stracchan; Chick & Pederson
analcime crystals:Na2O·Al2O3·4SiO2·2H2O
→
sc
c1- rr ppt·0corrosion rate
partially crystalline, partially amorphous layer of reaction products on top of the residual glass
in many cases, the layercan be removed easily(like ice from a car windshield)
cs = metastable solubility limit of the glass;cppt = solubility limit of the final crystal formed along the reaction pathcs > cppt ⇒ r cannot reach zero
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3110 tests
r = r0·(1 - c/c
s) + r
final·c/c
s
initial
rate
final
rate
silica saturation
log
q·s
log s·t
own work
saturation with respect to the glass is a transient stage in most cases
0
0
01.0
·
rr
c
c1- r r
s
ppt
⋅≈
=
∞
∞
sccforcc
1- rrs
→
=
·0
sccforcc
1- rrs
<<
=
·0
100 ÷
local precipitate
water film on glass surface
stage 1: due to large SA/V, pH → pHs and c → cs; ( ) 0cc / -1·r r s0s →=
stage 2: eventually, a local ppt forms with solubility cppt < cs; the rate in the vicinity of ppt is . Thus, a „local element“ is generated.
c → cs
c → cppt < cs
( ) 0cc-1·r r sppt0 >= /
diffusion
enhanced corrosion
water drop on glass surface
local precipitatec → cs
c → cppt < cs
diffusion
enhanced corrosion precorroded zoneprecorroded zone
„radius“ 0.140 nm 0.138 nm 0.137 0.136d(O-H) -.- 0.096 nm 0.0958 0.095 ϕ(H-O-H) --- --- 104.45° 120°
O2- OH- H2O H3O+
14W
32
10K
OHOHOH 2−
−+
=
+↔ ↔
proton transfer!H+ is not an ion, but an elementary particle
adsorption of proton by hydrogen: adsorption of proton by watermolecule:
ionization (dissociation) of water:
adsorption of proton by hydroxyl ion:
Grotthuss proton transfer:
F.M.Ersnberger:The Nonconformist Ion.J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 66(1983)747-750.
HO-Si≡
H+ -O-Si≡
H+ Na+ -O-Si≡
Na+(aq) HO-Si≡
2 HO-Si≡
H2O + ≡Si -O-Si≡ reaction of OH to H2O;condensation of silanolto siloxane bonds ...
HO-Si≡
H+ -O-Si≡
H+ Na+ -O-Si≡
Na+(aq) HO-Si≡
2 HO-Si≡
H2O + ≡Si -O-Si≡
... generates and shifts an inner boundary or transition zone
HO-Si≡
H+ -O-Si≡
H+ Na+ -O-Si≡
Na+(aq) HO-Si≡
2 HO-Si≡
H2O + ≡Si -O-Si≡
I. II. III.
2 ≡Si−O-Na+ + 2 H+
→ 2 ≡Si−OH + 2 Na+2 ≡Si−OH→ 2 ≡Si−O −Si≡
OH groups approacheach other; interstitial water moves into void
∝ √t
HO-Si≡
H+ -O-Si≡
H+ Na+ -O-Si≡
Na+(aq) HO-Si≡
2 HO-Si≡
H2O + ≡Si -O-Si≡
H2O + HO-Si≡
(HO)3-Si–
H4SiO4(aq)
∝ t
dissolutionof SiO2
∝ √t
HO-Si≡
H+ -O-Si≡
H+ Na+ -O-Si≡
Na+(aq) HO-Si≡
H2O + HO-Si≡
(HO)3-Si–
H4SiO4(aq)
H+ Na+ -O-Si≡
Na+(gel) HO-Si≡
2 HO-Si≡
H2O + ≡Si -O-Si≡
∝ √t
fast exchange of H+, Na+, H2O
∝ t
D ≈ 10-11 cm²/s
D ≈ 10-14 cm²/s
solution sub-surface zone bulk glass low density, high connectivity, H2O percolation high H2O mobility
D ≈ 10-5 cm²/s
same kind of chemistry like in aq. solutions; in specific: dominance ofH+ controlled reactions
Na+(aq), Cl-(aq) NaCl
rate control by fluid film diffusion: EA ≈ 20 kJ/mol
L
flow
FLUIDs Lcc
1-cr s
),,ƒ(v,, )0·( ηρββ =
⋅−=
r0
∆Ghydr
∆GR
∆G#
solid + solution
solution + corrosion products
educt E
product P
activated complex C#
precurrentequilibrium R
surface sites
Gib
bs fr
ee e
nerg
y
reaction coordinate ξ
≡Si−OH ↔ ≡Si−O- + H+
SiO2 + H2O (pH)
SiO2(aq) + ppt. containing SiO2
OH-≡Si−O−Si≡
[E]
[P]
[C#]
[R]
after Grambow
rate control by activated surface complex:EA ≈ 70-80 kJ/mol
hydr#
#hydr#
hydr##
?G?G
cc
RT?G
expRT
?Gexp
RT?G
exp
RT?G?G
expRT?G
exprrr
s
∝
−⋅
−≈
−
−⋅
−∝
−−−
−∝−= −+
11
reaction velocity:
linear free energy relationship (LFER):
∆Ghydr
∆GR
∆G#
solid + solution
solution + corrosion products
educt E
product P
activated complex C#
precurrentequilibrium R
surface sites
Gib
bs fr
ee e
nerg
y
reaction coordinate ξ
≡Si−OH ↔ ≡Si−O- + H+
SiO2 + H2O (pH)
SiO2(aq) + ppt. containing SiO2
OH-≡Si−O−Si≡
[E]
[P]
[C#]
[R]
after Grambow
rate control by activated surface complex:EA ≈ 70-80 kJ/mol
⋅⋅=
scc
1-Ch
kTr ]·[ #β
r0
glasschemistry
saturation;long termexposure
surfaceequilibrium
molecular dynamics
−+−−−=
s
hydrAX c
cRT
?GRTE
rr)(
1log)( ·
·logloglogξξε
θβ
thermochemical rate equation
LFER
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 1430
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
MacInnes Dole glass
HT fibre glass
-∆G
hydr
in k
J pe
r 10
0 g
glas
s
pH
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-8
-6
-4
-2
0
silica surface
alumina surface
log
Θ
pH
Corrosion rates at high water excess (low s parameter) :„Multiply“ the stability fingerprint or solubility (left graph) with thesurface coverage (right graph) ...
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
-12
-11
-10
log
r, r
in m
ol S
i / (
cm
2 ·s)
pH
2 4 6 8 10
60
70
80
90
100
log
r, r
in m
g/(c
m 2·d
)
pH
-3
-2
-1
0
1
-∆G
hydr
in k
J pe
r 10
0 g
glas
s
... and obtain a prediction of the dissolution rate as f(pH).
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-2.8
-2.4
-2.0
-1.6
-1.2
-0.8
-0.4
0.0
0.4lo
g r
(r
in m
g·cm
-2·d
-1)
pH-value
1
2
3
4N-A-B-S-glass
calculated rate DIN/ISO-test
log
q (q
in m
g·cm
-2)
2 4 6 8 10 12-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
stab
ility
-∆G
hydr [k
J pe
r 10
0 g
glas
s]
pH-value
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
log
r (
r in
mg·
cm-2·d
-1)
optical filter glass KG1
020406080
100
Al(OH)2- Al(OH)4
-
Al(OH)3, amAl3+
020406080
100
Al(OH)2+
Al(OH)3, aq
Al(OH)4
-Al(OH)2
+Al3+
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140
20406080
100
rela
tive
conc
entra
tion
of a
queo
us A
l spe
cies
in %
Al(LH*)25-
AlL2H*4-
AlL23-
Al(HL)L2-
AlL
AlHL+
Al3+
pH
+ citric acid
∞ diluted
rel c
once
ntra
tion
of A
l spe
cies
in %
Interaction between organic components and glass –a key to applications in medicine and biotechnology
two key mechanisms:• influence on the solubility,• influence on the surface equilibrium. furmic
acetic
lactic
oxalic
malic
tartric
phthalic
citric
Ganor & Lasaga 1998, Gross & Dahlmann 2003