chapter 7: balanced flow - universitetet i oslochapter 7: balanced flow 1 gef1100–autumn 2014...

45
GEF 1100 – Klimasystemet Chapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO)

Upload: others

Post on 14-Mar-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

GEF 1100 – Klimasystemet

Chapter 7: Balanced flow

1

GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014

Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO)

Page 2: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

1. Motivation

2. Geostrophic motion 2.1 Geostrophic wind 2.2 Synoptic charts 2.3 Balanced flows

3. Taylor-Proudman theorem

4. Thermal wind equation*

5. Subgeostrophic flow: The Ekman layer 5.1 The Ekman layer* 5.2 Surface (friction) wind 5.3 Ageostrophic flow

6. Summary

7. Take home message *With add ons.

Lect

ure

Ou

tlin

e –

Ch

. 7 Ch. 7 – Balanced flow

2

Page 3: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

Motivation 1. Motivation

www.yr.no 3

x Oslo wind forecast for today 12–18:

2 m/s light breeze, east-northeast

x

Page 4: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

Scale analysis – geostrophic balance

Consider magnitudes of first 2 terms in momentum eq. for a fluid on a rotating

sphere (Eq. 6-43 𝐷𝐮

𝐷𝑡 + f 𝒛 × 𝒖 +

1

𝜌𝛻𝑝 + 𝛻𝛷 = ℱ) for horizontal components

in a free atmosphere (ℱ=0,𝛻𝛷=0):

•𝐷𝐮

𝐷𝑡 +f 𝒛 × 𝒖 =

𝜕𝑢

𝜕𝑡 +𝒖 ∙ 𝛻𝒖 + f 𝒛 × 𝒖

• Rossby number: - Ratio of acceleration terms (U2/L) to Coriolis term (f U), - R0=U/f L - R0≃0.1 for large-scale flows in atmosphere (R0≃10-3 in ocean, Chapter 9)

4

2. Geostrophic motion

𝑈

𝑇10−4

𝑈2

𝐿

10−4

fU

10−3

Large-scale flow magnitudes in atmosphere: 𝑢 and 𝑣 ∼ 𝒰, 𝒰∼10 m/s, length scale: L ∼106 m, time scale: 𝒯 ∼105 s, U/ 𝒯≈ 𝒰2/L ∼10-4 ms-2, f45° ∼ 10-4 s-1

Page 5: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

Scale analysis – geostrophic balance

• Coriolis term is left (≙ smallness of R0) together with the pressure gradient term (~10-3):

f 𝒛 × 𝒖 + 1

𝜌𝛻𝑝 = 0 Eq. 7-2 geostrophic balance

• With 𝒛 × 𝒛 × 𝒖 = −𝒖 it can be rearranged to:

𝒖g=1

𝑓𝜌𝒛 × 𝛻𝑝 Eq. 7-3 geostrophic flow

• In component form:

(𝑢g, 𝑣g)= −1

𝑓𝜌

𝜕𝑝

𝜕𝑦,1

𝑓𝜌

𝜕𝑝

𝜕𝑥 Eq. 7-4

5

2. Geostrophic motion

𝒛 × 𝛻𝑝 = 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 0 0 1𝑢𝑔 𝑣𝑔 0

= 𝑥 −𝜕𝑝

𝜕𝑦 + 𝑦

𝜕𝑝

𝜕𝑥

Note: For geostrophic balance the pressure gradient is balanced by the Coriolis term; to be approximately satisfied for flows of small R0.

Page 6: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

Geostrophic flow (NH: f>0)

2. Geostrophic motion

6 Marshall and Plumb (2008)

High: clockwise flow

Low: anticlockwise flow

Page 7: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

Geostrophic flow 2. Geostrophic motion

7

Marshall and Plumb (2008)

Note: The geostrophic wind flows parallel to the isobars and is strongest where the isobars are closest (pressure maps > winds).

𝒖g = 1

𝑓𝜌𝛻𝑝 =

1

𝑓𝜌

𝛿𝑝

𝛿𝑠 s: distance

Page 8: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

Geostrophic flow – vertical component

2. Geostrophic motion

Defined as horizontal flow (z–component of Eq. 7-3 is zero), which can not be deduced from geostrophic balance (Eq. 7-2). • For incompressible fluids (like the ocean) 𝜌 can be neglected, 𝑓~const. for planetary scales, then geostrophic wind components (Eq. 7-4) gives:

𝜕𝑢g

𝜕x+

𝜕𝑣g

𝜕y = 0 Eq. 7-5 ``Horizontal flow is non divergent.’’

Comparison with continuity equation (𝛻 ∙ 𝒖 = 0) => 𝑤g= 0 => 𝜕𝑤g

𝜕z = 0

=> geostrophic flow is horizontal.

• For compressible fluids (like the atmosphere) 𝜌 varies, see next slide.

8

Page 9: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

𝒖g=g𝑓𝒛𝑝 × 𝛻𝑝z Eq. 7-7

(𝑢g, 𝑣g)= −g𝑓

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑦,g𝑓

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑥 Eq. 7-8

𝛻𝑝 ∙ 𝒖g =𝜕𝑢

𝜕x+

𝜕𝑣

𝜕y = 0 Eq. 7-9

Geostrophic wind is non-divergent in pressure coordinates, if 𝑓~const. (≤ 1000 km).

Geostrophic wind – pressure coordinates “p”

2. Geostrophic motion

9

Marshall and Plumb (2008)

Note: Height (z) contours are streamlines of the geostrophic flow on pressure surfaces; geostrophic flow streams along z contours (as p contours on height surfaces) (Fig. 7-4).

Page 10: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

10 knots

5 knots

2. Geostrophic motion

10

500 hPa wind and geopotential height (gpm), 12 GMT June 21, 2003

Marshall and Plumb (2008)

Page 11: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

2. Geostrophic motion

Today’s 500 hPa GH (dam) map

www.ecmwf.int

L

H

x x Oslo

Page 12: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

Summary: The geostrophic wind ug

• Geostrophic wind: “wind on the turning earth“: Geo (Greek) “Earth“, strophe (Greek) “turning”.

• The friction force and centrifugal forces are negligible.

• Balance between pressure gradient and Coriolis force

→ geostrophic balance

• The geostrophic wind is a horizontal wind.

• It displays a good approximation of the horizontal wind in the free atmosphere; not defined at the equator:

- Assumption: u=ug v=vg

y

p

fug

1

x

p

fvg

1p

f z

1

gu

ρ: density f = 2 Ω sinφ; at equator f = 0 at Pole f is maximum

12

2. Geostrophic motion

Page 13: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

L

H

FP

CF

gu

Geostrophic wind

Isobars

Balance

between:

FP = -FC 13

2. Geostrophic motion

𝒖g=1

𝑓𝜌𝒛 × 𝛻𝑝

Page 14: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

L

H

FP

CF

gu

Which rules can be laid down for the geostrophic wind?

1. The wind blows isobars parallel. 2. Seen in direction of the wind, the low pressure lies to the left. 3. The pressure gradient force and the Corolis force balance each other balance motion. The geostrophic wind closely describes the horizontal wind above the boundary layer!

Geostrophic wind

Isobars

Balance

between:

FP = -FC 14

2. Geostrophic motion

Page 15: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

The geostrophic wind ug

Geostrophic wind balance (GB):

Simultaneous wind and pressure measurements in the open atmosphere show that mostly the GB is fully achieved.

Advantage: The wind field can be determined directly from the pressure or height fields.

Disadvantage: The horizontal equation of motion becomes purely diagnostic; stationary state. (→ weather forecast)

15

2. Geostrophic motion

Page 16: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

Zonal mean

zonal wind u (m/s)

January average

SPARC climatology

Pre

ssu

re [h

Pa

]

1000

W

W

E

E

E

16

2. Geostrophic motion

Page 17: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

2. Geostrophic motion

Rossby number @500hPa, 12 GMT June 21, 2003

Marshall and Plumb (2008) 17

R0 > 0.1

Page 18: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

(Other) Balanced flows

When geostrophic balance does

not hold, then R0 ≥ 1:

• Gradient wind balance (R0∼1)

Pressure gradient force, Coriolis force and Centrifugal force play a role.

• Cyclostrophic wind balance (R0>1)

Pressure gradient force and Centrifugal force play a role.

2. Geostrophic motion

18

Marshall and Plumb (2008)

Page 19: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

Gradient wind uG – 2 cases

Kraus (2004) 19

L

streamline

streamline

uG

uG

Case 1: sub-geostrophic Case 2: super-geostrophic

Balance between the forces:

Fpressure = -(FCoriolis+ FZ(centrifugal))

Balance between the forces:

Fpressure+ FZ(centrifugal) = -FCoriolis

2. Geostrophic motion

Page 20: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

Cyclostrophic wind

FZ

Balance between: FP = -FZ

- Physically appropriate solutions are orbits around a low pressure centre, that can run both cyclonically (counter clockwise) as well as anticyclonically (clockwise). - The cyclostrophic wind appears in small-scale whirlwinds (dust devils, tornados).

20

L

2. Geostrophic motion

Page 21: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

Taylor-Proudman theorem - see Ch. 10 & 11

21 Marshall and Plumb (2008)

For geostrophic motions and incompressible flows (𝜌=const.): Taylor-Proudman theorem: (Ω ∙ 𝛻) 𝒖 = 0 Eq.7-14 (Ω ∙ 𝛻 gradient operator in direction of Ω, i.e., for 𝑧 :

𝜕𝒖

𝜕𝑧= 0 Eq. 7-15

Note: For geostrophic motion, if the fluid is incompressible (𝜌 const.), the flow is two-dimensional and does not vary in the direction of the rotation vector.

3. Taylor-Proudman theorem

Page 22: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

The thermal wind

ug(z)

ug(z+Δz)

T

Altitude z

Geostrophic wind change with altitude z?

→”Thermal wind” (∆zug)

Applying geostrophic wind equation together with ideal gas law; insert finite vertical layer ∆z* with average temperature T, leads to: (*∆: finite difference)

22

4. Thermal wind equation

z

Δz

Page 23: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

Thermal wind approximation

ug(z)

ug(z+Δz)

T

Altitude z

z

Δz

z+Δz

Thgz zu ˆ

In many cases: 1) ug <10 m/s; or 2) strong horizontal temperature gradient; then the first term can be neglected.

TzTf

gzzz hgggz zuuu ˆ)()(

23

Note: In this approximation, the wind change is always parallel to the average isotherm (lines of const. temperature).

4. Thermal wind equation

z

Page 24: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

y

Which rules can I deduce from the thermal wind approximation, if ug<10 m/s ?

- The geostr. wind change with height is parallel to the mean isotherms, - whereby the colder air remains to the left on the NH, - geostrophic left rotation with increasing height for cold air advection, - geostrophic right rotation with increasing height for warm air advection.

Thermal wind approximation

x

25

∆z ug ∆z ug

ug (z+∆z ) ug (z+∆z )

ug (z) ug (z)

cold

cold air advection warm

warm air advection

cold

4. Thermal wind equation

Page 25: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

Thermal wind:

Compare: - Thermal wind is determined by the horizontal temperature gradient, - geostrophic wind through the horizontal pressure gradient.

Geostrophic wind:

x

p

fvg

1

x

T

f

agzvzzv

z

v

y

T

f

agzuzzu

z

u

gg

g

gg

g

)()(

)()(

y

p

fug

1

26

4. Thermal wind equation - Summary

𝜕𝒖g

𝜕𝑧=

𝑎g𝑓𝒛 × 𝛻𝑇 Eq. 7-18

𝒖g=1

𝑓𝜌𝒛 × 𝛻𝑝 Eq. 7-3

𝒖g=𝑔

𝑓 𝒛𝑝 × 𝛻𝑝 𝑧 Eq. 7-7

𝑎: Thermal expansion coefficient (Ch. 4) g: Gravity acceleration

Page 26: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

Thermal wind - examples

27 Marshall and Plumb (2008)

4. Thermal wind equation

W W

C W C

W W

Page 27: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

28

4. Thermal wind equation

Marshall and Plumb (2008)

x x Oslo

Temperature (°C) @500hPa, 12 GMT June 21, 2003

Page 28: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

29

4. Thermal wind equation

Marshall and Plumb (2008)

C W

W

Page 29: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

30 Marshall and Plumb (2008)

4. Thermal wind equation

Stratospheric polar vortex

Page 30: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

GEF 1100 – Klimasystemet

Chapter 7: Balanced flow

31

GEF1100–Autumn 2014 02.10.2014

Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO)

Page 31: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

1. Motivation

2. Geostrophic motion 2.1 Geostrophic wind 2.2 Synoptic charts 2.3 Balanced flows

3. Taylor-Proudman theorem

4. Thermal wind equation

5. Subgeostrophic flow: The Ekman layer 5.1 The Ekman layer* 5.2 Surface (friction) wind 5.3 Ageostrophic flow

6. Summary

7. Take home message

*With add ons.

Lect

ure

Ou

tlin

e –

Ch

. 7 Ch. 7 – Balanced flow

32

Page 32: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

Sub-geostrophic flow: The Ekman layer

33

𝑓𝒛 × 𝒖 +1

𝜌𝛻𝑝 = ℱ Eq. 7-25

• Large scale flow in free atmosphere and ocean is close to geostrophic and thermal wind balance.

• Boundary layers have large departures from geostrophy due to friction forces.

Ekman layer: - Friction acceleration ℱ becomes important,

- roughness of surface generates turbulence in the first ~1 km of the atmosphere,

- wind generates turbulence at the ocean surface down to first 100 meters.

Sub-geostrophic flow: R0 small, ℱ exists, then horizontal component of momentum (geostrophic) balance (Eq. 7-2) can be written as:

5. Subgeostrophic flow

Page 33: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

Surface (friction) wind

34

Marshall and Plumb (2008)

𝑓𝒛 × 𝒖 +1

𝜌𝛻𝑝 = ℱ Eq. 7-25

5. Subgeostrophic flow

ℱ − 𝑓𝒛 × 𝒖 and

1. Start with u 2. Coriolis force per unit mass must be to the right of u 3. Frictional force per unit mass acts as a drag and must be opposite to u. 4. Sum of the two forces (dashed arrow) must be balanced by the pressure gradient force per unit mass 5. Pressure gradient is not normal to the wind vector or the wind is no longer directed along the isobars, however the low pressure system is still on the left side but with a deflection.

=> The flow is sub-geostrophic (less than geostrophic); ageostrophic component directed from high to low.

Page 34: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

The ageostrophic flow uag

The ageostrophic flow is the difference between the geostrophic

flow (ug) and the horizontal flow (uh):

uh = ug+ uag Eq. 7-26

𝑓𝒛 × 𝒖ag = ℱ Eq. 7-27

The ageostrophic component is always directed to the right of ℱ

in the NH.

35

5. Sub-geostrophic flow

ug

uh

uag

Page 35: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

36

4. Sub-geostrophic flow

Surface pressure (hPa) and wind (m/s or kn ?), 12 GMT June 21, 2003

10 knots

5 knots

Marshall and Plumb (2008)

Page 36: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

Today’s surface pressure (hPa) map

4. Sub-geostrophic flow

www.yr.no

37

www.met.fu-berlin.de

Page 37: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

H L

Marshall and Plumb (2008)

Surface (friction) wind

4. Sub-geostrophic flow

38

Low pressure (NH): - anticlockwise flow - often called “cyclone”

High pressure (NH): - clockwise flow - often called “anticyclone”

Page 38: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

Vertical motion induced by Ekman layers

• Ageostrophic flow is horizontally divergent.

• Convergence/divergence drives vertical motions.

• In pressure coordinates, if f is const., the continuity equation (Eq. 6-12) becomes:

𝛻𝑝 ∙ 𝒖𝑎𝑔 + 𝜕𝑤

𝜕𝑝 = 0

• Low: convergent flow

• High: divergent flow

• Continuity equation requires vertical motions:

- “Ekman pumping“ > ascent

- “Ekman suction” > descent

4. Sub-geostrophic flow

Marshall and Plumb (2008)

39

Page 39: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

Characteristics of horizontal wind

Combination of horizontal and vertical vergences

40

4. Sub-geostrophic flow

Page 40: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

The Ekman spiral – theory

Roedel, 1987

uh

ug

The Ekman spiral was calculated for the oceanic friction layer by the Swedish oceanographer in 1905. In 1906, a possible application in Meteorology was developed.

u0

41

4. Sub-geostrophic flow

𝑓𝑧 × 𝒖 +1

𝜌𝛻𝑝 = ℱ Eq. 7-25

ℱ = 𝜇 𝜕2𝒖/𝜕𝑧2

𝜇: constant eddy viscosity

Ekman spiral: simplified theoretical calculation

Page 41: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

Wind measurement in the boundary layer

Kraus, 2004 The “Leipzig wind profile”

42

uh

ug

m

4. Sub-geostrophic flow

Page 42: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

43 Marshall and Plumb (2008)

4. Sub-geostrophic flow

Page 43: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

44 Marshall and Plumb (2008)

4. Sub-geostrophic flow

Page 44: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

45/36

Summary

𝑓𝜕𝒖

𝜕𝑧= 𝑎𝑔 𝒛 × 𝛻𝑇

Chapters 6 and 7

Page 45: Chapter 7: Balanced flow - Universitetet i osloChapter 7: Balanced flow 1 GEF1100–Autumn 2014 30.09.2014 Prof. Dr. Kirstin Krüger (MetOs, UiO) 1. Motivation 2. Geostrophic motion

• Balanced flows for horizontal fluids (atmosphere and ocean).

• Balanced horizontal winds:

– Geostrophic wind balance good approximation for the observed wind in the free troposphere.

– Gradient wind balance and cyclostrophic wind balance occur with higher Rossby number.

– Surface wind (subgeostrophic flow) balance occurs within the Ekman layer.

• Thermal wind is good approximation for the geostrophic wind change with height z.

Take home message

46