chapter 4 – analysis of single cash flows

28
Chapter 10, Solutions Cornett, Adair, and Nofsinger CHAPTER 10 –CALCULATING EXPECTED RETURN AND MARKET RISK Questions LG1 1. Consider an asset that provides the same return no matter what economic state occurs. What would be the standard deviation (or risk) of this asset? Explain. Since this asset has no variation in its return, it will have no standard deviation. This could be shown mathematically be demonstrating that each economic state’s return is the same as it average. Therefore, all terms in the standard deviation summation equation are zero. This asset would be known as a risk-free asset. LG1 2. Why is expected return considered “forward-looking”? What are the challenges for practitioners to utilize expected return? Expected return is “forward-looking” in the sense that it represents the return investors expect to receive in the future as compensation for the market risk taken. The challenge is that practitioners cannot precisely know what the future holds and thus what the expected return should be. Thus, we create methods to estimate the expected return. LG2 3. In 2000, the S&P 500 Index earned −9.1 percent while the T-bill yield was 5.9 percent. Does this mean the market risk premium was negative? Explain. The market risk premium is a forward-looking tool and should always be positive. Because the market has risk, it will periodically have a negative return or a small positive return that is smaller than the T-bill rate. Thus, realized returns over a short period of time will sometimes show what appears to be a negative risk premium. However, historical risk premiums should be measured over long periods of time. 10-1

Upload: dinhkhanh

Post on 08-Dec-2016

250 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CHAPTER 4 – ANALYSIS OF SINGLE CASH FLOWS

Chapter 10, Solutions Cornett, Adair, and Nofsinger

CHAPTER 10 –CALCULATING EXPECTED RETURN AND MARKET RISK

Questions

LG1 1. Consider an asset that provides the same return no matter what economic state occurs. What would be the standard deviation (or risk) of this asset? Explain.

Since this asset has no variation in its return, it will have no standard deviation. This could be shown mathematically be demonstrating that each economic state’s return is the same as it average. Therefore, all terms in the standard deviation summation equation are zero. This asset would be known as a risk-free asset.

LG1 2. Why is expected return considered “forward-looking”? What are the challenges for practitioners to utilize expected return?

Expected return is “forward-looking” in the sense that it represents the return investors expect to receive in the future as compensation for the market risk taken. The challenge is that practitioners cannot precisely know what the future holds and thus what the expected return should be. Thus, we create methods to estimate the expected return.

LG2 3. In 2000, the S&P 500 Index earned −9.1 percent while the T-bill yield was 5.9 percent. Does this mean the market risk premium was negative? Explain.

The market risk premium is a forward-looking tool and should always be positive. Because the market has risk, it will periodically have a negative return or a small positive return that is smaller than the T-bill rate. Thus, realized returns over a short period of time will sometimes show what appears to be a negative risk premium. However, historical risk premiums should be measured over long periods of time.

LG2 4. How might the magnitude of the market risk premium impact people’s desire to buy stocks?

Everybody has a different level of risk aversion. People who have a low level of risk aversion would be willing to buy stocks with high risk . However, people who have a high level of risk aversion would only be willing to buy stocks with low risk. Therefore, the magnitude of the risk premium does impact who wants to buy stocks.

LG3 5. Describe how adding a risk-free security to modern portfolio theory allows investors to do better than the efficient frontier.

The best portfolios investors can hold with only risky assets are the efficient portfolios on the efficient frontier. If investors can borrow and lend at a risk free rate, then they can do better. To improve over the efficient frontier, investors should allocate their portfolio to the risk free rate and to the market portfolio. With the right weights between the two, an

10-1

Page 2: CHAPTER 4 – ANALYSIS OF SINGLE CASH FLOWS

Chapter 10, Solutions Cornett, Adair, and Nofsinger

investor can find a portfolio with the same level of risk as an efficient portfolio but has a higher expected return.

LG3 6. Show on a graph like Figure 10.2 where a stock with a beta of 1.3 would be located on the Security Market Line. Then show where that stock would be located if it is undervalued.

Figure shown:

Beta

Req

uire

d R

etur

n (%

)

Rf

RMM

1

Security Market Line

1.3

Stock with 1.3 Beta Depot

RStock

Under valued stock with 1.3 Beta Depot

LG3 7. Consider that you have three stocks in your portfolio and wish to add a fourth. You want to know if the fourth stock will make the portfolio riskier or less risky. Compare and contrast how this would be assessed using standard deviation versus market risk (beta) as the measure of risk.

Using standard deviation, you would need to determine how the fourth stock interacts with the three stocks already owned. To do this you would have to compute the correlation between the new stock and each of the three already held. Then, the portfolio standard deviation could be computed. If the new portfolio standard deviation is lower then the original portfolio standard deviation, then adding the new stock lowers the risk. Of course, the portions, or weights of all the stocks will matter. Determining whether adding a stock will increase or lower the risk of the portfolio is much easier using beta. If the beta of the fourth stock is higher than the beta of the portfolio, then it will increase the risk when added.

10-2

Page 3: CHAPTER 4 – ANALYSIS OF SINGLE CASH FLOWS

Chapter 10, Solutions Cornett, Adair, and Nofsinger

LG3 8. Describe how different allocations between the risk-free security and the market portfolio can achieve any level of market risk desired. Give examples of a portfolio from a person who is very risk averse and a portfolio for someone who is not so averse to taking risk.

An investor can allocate money between a risk-free security that has zero risk (β=0), and the market portfolio that has market risk (β=1). If 75% of the portfolio is invested in the market, then the portfolio will have a β=0.75. If only 25% is invested in the market, then the portfolio will have a market risk of β=0.25. The first example (β=0.75) might be taken by a less risk averse investor while the second example (β=0.25) illustrates the portfolio of a more risk averse investor. By allocating the investment money between 0 and 100% into the market portfolio, an investor can achieve any level of market risk desired.

LG4 9. Cisco Systems has a beta of 1.88. Does this mean that you should expect Cisco to earn a return 88 percent higher than the S&P 500 Index return? Explain.

Not quite. A beta of 1.88 means that Cisco’s risk premium is 88% higher then the market risk premium. In other words, we must account for the risk free rate. This relationship is shown in the CAPM equation.

LG4 10. Note from Table 10.2 that some technology-oriented firms (Intel, and IBM) in the Dow Jones Industrial Average have high market risk while others (AT&T, Microsoft, and Verizon) have low market risk. How do you explain this?

Not all technology industries have the same level of risk. Notice from this example that the more manufacturing (hardware) tech companies have higher risk. The service and software tech companies have lower risk. This may be an indication of the type of assets needed by the firms and the amount of debt required.

LG4 11. Find a beta estimate from three different sources for General Electric (GE). Compare these three values. Why might they be different?

Yahoo! Finance beta was 0.59. MSN Money shows a beta of 0.76. Hoovers lists a beta of 0.8. The beta sources may use (i) different market portfolios, (ii) different time periods, or (iii) different time increments (annual returns versus months, weeks, etc.).

LG4 12. If you were to compute beta yourself, what choices would you make regarding the market portfolio, the holding period for the returns (daily, weekly, etc.), and the number of returns? Justify your choices.

It is common to use the S&P500, monthly returns, and either three to five years of data.

LG5 13. Explain how the concept of a positive risk-return relationship breaks down if you can systematically find stocks that are over-valued and under-valued.

10-3

Page 4: CHAPTER 4 – ANALYSIS OF SINGLE CASH FLOWS

Chapter 10, Solutions Cornett, Adair, and Nofsinger

Consider two stocks: one stock has a beta of 0.9 and is undervalued, the other has a beta of 1 and is overvalued. If beta perfectly explained expected returns, then the higher beta stock would offer a higher expected return. However, if you believe the lower beta stock is undervalued, then you are saying it will achieve a return higher than expected by its beta. You also believe the overvalued stock will earn a return lower than expected by its beta. Thus, you might expect the undervalued stock to outperform the overvalued stock even though the risks of the two stocks suggest otherwise.

LG5 14. Determine what level of market efficiency each event is consistent with:A. Immediately after an earnings announcement the stock price jumps and then

stays at the new level.B. The CEO buys 50,000 shares of his company and the stock price does not

change.C. The stock price immediately jumps when a stock split is announced, but then

retraces half of the gain over the next day. D. An investor analyzes company quarterly and annual balance sheets and income

statements looking for under-valued stocks. The investor earns about the same return as the S&P 500 Index.

A. semi-strong formB. strong formC. not efficientD. semi-strong form

LG5 15. Why do most investment scams conducted over the Internet and e-mail involve penny stocks instead of S&P 500 Index stocks?

There is tremendous liquidity in the large stocks. As such, these scams would not impact their stocks price and thus not be effective. Penny stocks have very little liquidity. So if a few investors buy the stocks in the scam, they will push up the price and allow the scam promoters to sell at a profit.

LG5 16. Describe a stock market bubble. Can a bubble occur in a single stock?

Bubbles are initially started with an increase in price that is typically justified by the economics and fundamentals. Then many people get irrationally exuberant about the asset(s) and push prices beyond those that are justified. Eventually, there are no more buyers for the overvalued asset and prices drop. As people begin to believe that the price is a bubble, the price free falls. No one buys the stock while it is plummeting. Yes, a bubble can occur in a single stock.

LG6 17. If stock prices are not strong-form efficient, then what might be the price reaction to a firm announcing a stock buyback? Explain.

10-4

Page 5: CHAPTER 4 – ANALYSIS OF SINGLE CASH FLOWS

Chapter 10, Solutions Cornett, Adair, and Nofsinger

Two different arguments could be made. First, the price could increase with the realization that this demand for stock will push up the stock price. Alternatively, the price could decline if investors believe that the company does not have any good product related investments and thus must buy back its stock.

LG7 18. Compare and contrast the assumptions that need to be made to compute a required return using CAPM and the constant growth rate model.

When using the CAPM to compute required return, you need to make assumptions about what the expected market return will be, what the risk free rate will be, and what the future beta of the firm will be. The future beta is commonly similar to the recent past beta. The risk free rate is well estimated by T-bill rates and the yield curve. These two are reasonably estimated. However, the stock market is very volatile and the future market return is difficult to estimate. The constant growth rate model assumes that the growth of the firm will remain constant. The growth rate and the dividend must be assumed. Firms do not change their dividends very much, so that estimation is not difficult. However, the required rate is very sensitive to the estimated growth rate. Both models require difficult assumptions.

LG7 19. How should you handle a case where required return computations from CAPM and the constant growth rate model are very different?

First, examine the assumptions of each model. If no mistakes have been made, then compute the required return for similar firms in the same industry. Use the CAPM or constant growth rate estimate that most resembles that of its competitors.

ProblemsBasic Problems 10-1 Expected Return Compute the expected return given these three economic states,

their likelihoods,LG1 and the potential returns:

Economic State

Probability Return

Fast Growth 0.3 40%Slow Growth 0.5 10%Recession 0.2 −25%

Expected return = 0.3×40% + 0.5×10% + 0.2×-25% = 12%

LG1 10-2 Expected Return Compute the expected return given these three economic states, their likelihoods, and the potential returns:

Economic State

Probability Return

10-5

Page 6: CHAPTER 4 – ANALYSIS OF SINGLE CASH FLOWS

Chapter 10, Solutions Cornett, Adair, and Nofsinger

Fast Growth 0.2 35%Slow Growth 0.6 10%Recession 0.2 −30%

Expected return = 0.2×35% + 0.6×10% + 0.2×-30% = 7%

LG2 10-3 Required Return If the risk-free rate is 6 percent and the risk premium is 5 percent, what is the required return?

Required return = 6% + 5% = 11%

LG2 10-4 Required Return If the risk-free rate is 3 percent and the risk premium is 7 percent, what is the required return?

Required return = 3% + 7% = 10%

LG2 10-5 Risk Premium The average annual return on the S&P 500 Index from 1986 to 1995 was 15.8 percent. The average annual T-bill yield during the same period was 5.6 percent. What was the market risk premium during these ten years?

Average market risk premium = 15.8% − 5.6% = 10.2%

LG2 10-6 Risk Premium The average annual return on the S&P 500 Index from 1996 to 2005 was 10.8 percent. The average annual T-bill yield during the same period was 3.6 percent. What was the market risk premium during these ten years?

Average market risk premium = 10.8% − 3.6% = 7.2%

LG3 10-7 CAPM Required Return Hastings Entertainment has a beta of 0.24. If the market return is expected to be 11 percent and the risk-free rate is 4 percent, what is Hastings’ required return?

Hastings’ required return = 4% + 0.24 × (11% − 4%) = 5.68%

LG3 10-8 CAPM Required Return Nanometrics Inc. has a beta of 4.05. If the market return is expected to be 12 percent and the risk-free rate is 4.5 percent, what is Nanometrics’ required return?

Nanometrics’ required return = 4.5% + 4.05 × (12% − 4.5%) = 34.875%

LG3 10-9 Company Risk Premium Netflicks, Inc. has a beta of 3.61. If the market return is expected to be 13 percent and the risk-free rate is 6 percent, what is Netflicks’ risk premium?

10-6

Page 7: CHAPTER 4 – ANALYSIS OF SINGLE CASH FLOWS

Chapter 10, Solutions Cornett, Adair, and Nofsinger

Netflicks’ risk premium = 3.61 × (13% − 6%) = 25.27%

LG3 10-10 Company Risk Premium Paycheck Inc. has a beta of 0.94. If the market return is expected to be 11 percent and the risk-free rate is 3 percent, what is Paycheck’s risk premium?

Paycheck’s risk premium = 0.94 × (11% − 3%) = 7.52%

LG3 10-11 Portfolio Beta You have a portfolio with a beta of 1.2. What will be the new portfolio beta if you keep 90 percent of your money in the old portfolio and 10 percent in a stock with a beta of 1.9?

New portfolio beta = 0.90×1.2 + 0.10×1.9 = 1.27

LG3 10-12 Portfolio Beta You have a portfolio with a beta of 1.1. What will be the new portfolio beta if you keep 85 percent of your money in the old portfolio and 15 percent in a stock with a beta of 0.5?

New portfolio beta = 0.85×1.1 + 0.15×0.5 = 1.01

LG5 10-13 Stock Market Bubble The Nasdaq stock market bubble peaked at 4,816 in 2000. Two and a half years later it had fallen to 1,000. What was the percentage decline?

Market decline = (1,000 − 4,816) ÷ 4,816 = −0.7924 = −79.24%

LG5 10-14 Stock Market Bubble The Japanese stock market bubble peaked at 38,916 in 1989. Two and a half years later it had fallen to 15,900. What was the percentage decline?

Market decline = (15,900 − 38,916) ÷ 38,916 = −0.5914 = −59.14%

LG7 10-15 Required Return Paccar’s current stock price is $73.10 and it is likely to pay a $2.69 dividend next year. Since analysts estimate Paccar will have a 11.2% growth rate, what is its required return?

Use equation 10.6:

LG7 10-16 Required Return Universal Forest’s current stock price of Universal Forest is $54.00 and it is likely to pay a $0.23 dividend next year. Since analysts estimate Universal Forest will have a 10.0% growth rate, what is its required return?

Use equation 10.6:

10-7

Page 8: CHAPTER 4 – ANALYSIS OF SINGLE CASH FLOWS

Chapter 10, Solutions Cornett, Adair, and Nofsinger

Intermediate Problems 10-17 Expected Return Risk For the same economic state probability distribution in

Problem 10.1, determine the standard deviation of the expected return.LG1

Economic State

Probability Return

Fast Growth 0.3 40%Slow Growth 0.5 10%Recession 0.2 −25%

Use equation 10.2 and expected return from Problem 10.1 of 12%:

LG1 10-18 Expected Return Risk For the same economic state probability distribution in Problem 10.2, determine the standard deviation of the expected return.

Economic State

Probability Return

Fast Growth 0.2 35%Slow Growth 0.6 10%Recession 0.2 −30%

Use equation 10.2 and expected return from problem 10.2 of 7%:

LG3 10-19 Under/Over Valued Stock A manager believes his firm will earn a 14 percent return next year. His firm has a beta of 1.5, the expected return on the market is 12 percent, and the risk-free rate is 4 percent. Compute the return the firm should earn given its level of risk and determine whether the manager is saying the firm is under-valued or over-valued.

Use CAPM to determine the firm’s required return = 4% + 1.5 × (12% − 4%) = 16%Since the return required for the level of risk is 16% and the manager believes a 14% return will be achieved, the manager is saying the firm is over-valued.

LG3 10-20 Under/Over Valued Stock A manager believes his firm will earn a 14 percent return next year. His firm has a beta of 1.2, the expected return on the market is 11 percent, and the risk-free rate is 5 percent. Compute the return the firm should earn given

10-8

Page 9: CHAPTER 4 – ANALYSIS OF SINGLE CASH FLOWS

Chapter 10, Solutions Cornett, Adair, and Nofsinger

its level of risk and determine whether the manager is saying the firm is under-valued or over-valued.

Use CAPM to determine the firm’s required return = 5% + 1.2 × (11% − 5%) = 12.2%Since the return required for the level of risk is 12.2% and the manager believes a 14% return will be achieved, the manager is saying the firm is under-valued.

LG3 10-21 Portfolio Beta You own $5,000 of Olympic Steel stock that has a beta of 2.9. You also own $7,000 of Rent-a-Center (beta=1.5) and $8,000 of Lincoln Educational (beta=0.2). What is the beta of your portfolio?

First determine the total value of the portfolio and the weights of each stock in the portfolio:Total value = $5,000 + $7,000 + $8,000 = $20,000Olympic Steel weight = $5,000 / $20,000 = 25%Rent-a-Center weight = $7,000 / $20,000 = 35%Lincoln Educational weight = $8,000 / $20,000 = 40%Now compute the portfolio beta = 0.25×2.9 + 0.35×1.5 + 0.40×0.2 = 1.33

LG3 10-22 Portfolio Beta You own $7,000 of Human Genome stock that has a beta of 3.5. You also own $8,000 of Frozen Food Express (beta=1.6) and $10,000 of Molecular Devices (beta=0.4). What is the beta of your portfolio?

First determine the total value of the portfolio and the weights of each stock in the portfolio:Total value = $7,000 + $8,000 + $10,000 = $25,000Human Genome weight = $7,000 / $25,000 = 28%Frozen Food Express weight = $8,000 / $25,000 = 32%Molecular Devices weight = $10,000 / $25,000 = 40%Now compute the portfolio beta = 0.28×3.5 + 0.32×1.6 + 0.40×0.4 = 1.65

Advanced Problems 10-23 Expected Return and Risk Compute the expected return and standard deviation

given these four economic states, their likelihoods, and the potential returns: LG1

Economic State

Probability Return

Fast Growth 0.30 60%Slow Growth 0.50 13%Recession 0.15 −15%Depression 0.05 −45%

Expected return = 0.3×60% + 0.5×13% + 0.15×-15% + 0.05×-45% = 20%

10-9

Page 10: CHAPTER 4 – ANALYSIS OF SINGLE CASH FLOWS

Chapter 10, Solutions Cornett, Adair, and Nofsinger

LG1 10-24 Expected Return and Risk Compute the expected return and standard deviation given these four economic states, their likelihoods, and the potential returns:

Economic State

Probability Return

Fast Growth 0.25 50%Slow Growth 0.55 11%Recession 0.15 −15%Depression 0.05 −50%

Expected return = 0.25×50% + 0.55×11% + 0.15×-15% + 0.05×-50% = 13.8%

LG3 10-25 Risk Premiums You own $10,000 of Denny’s Corp stock that has a beta of 2.9. You also own $15,000 of Qwest Communications (beta=1.5) and $15,000 of Southwest Airlines (beta=0.4). Assume that the market return will be 13 percent and the risk-free rate is 5.5 percent. What is the market risk premium? What is the risk premium of each stock? What is the risk premium of the portfolio?

Market risk premium = 13% − 5.5% = 7.5%Denny’s risk premium = 2.9×(13%−5.5%) = 21.75%Qwest’s risk premium = 1.5×(13%−5.5%) = 11.25%Southwest Airlines risk premium = 0.4×(13%−5.5%) = 3.0%

For the portfolio, determine the total value of the portfolio and the weights of each stock in the portfolio:Total value = $10,000 + $15,000 + $15,000 = $40,000Denny’s weight = $10,000 / $40,000 = 25%Qwest’s weight = $15,000 / $40,000 = 37.5%Southwest Airlines weight = $15,000 / $40,000 = 37.5%Now compute the portfolio beta = 0.25×2.9 + 0.375×1.5 + 0.375×0.4 = 1.44So the portfolio’s risk premium = 1.44×(13%−5.5%) = 10.8%

LG3 10-26 Risk Premiums You own $15,000 of Opsware Inc. stock that has a beta of 3.8. You also own $10,000 of Lowe’s Companies (beta=1.6) and $10,000 of New York Times (beta=0.8). Assume that the market return will be 12 percent and the risk-free rate is 6 percent. What is the market risk premium? What is the risk premium of each stock? What is the risk premium of the portfolio?

Market risk premium = 12% − 6% = 6%Opsware’s risk premium = 3.8×(12%−6%) = 22.8%

10-10

Page 11: CHAPTER 4 – ANALYSIS OF SINGLE CASH FLOWS

Chapter 10, Solutions Cornett, Adair, and Nofsinger

Lowe’s risk premium = 1.6×(12%−6%) = 9.6%New York Times risk premium = 0.8×(12%−6%) = 4.8%

For the portfolio, determine the total value of the portfolio and the weights of each stock in the portfolio:Total value = $15,000 + $10,000 + $10,000 = $35,000Opsware’s weight = $15,000 / $35,000 = 42.9%Lowe’s weight = $10,000 / $35,000 = 28.55%New York Times weight = $10,000 / $35,000 = 28.55%Now compute the portfolio beta = 0.429×3.8 + 0.2855×1.6 + 0.2855×0.8 = 2.32So the portfolio’s risk premium = 2.32×(12%−6%) = 13.9%

LG3 10-27 Portfolio Beta and Required Return You hold the positions in the table below. What is the beta of your portfolio? If you expect the market to earn 12 percent and the risk-free rate is 3.5 percent, what is the required return of the portfolio?

Price Shares BetaAmazon.com $40.80 100 3.8Family Dollar Stores $30.10 150 1.2McKesson Corp $57.40 75 0.4Schering-Plough Corp $23.80 200 0.5

This problem can be solved two different and equivalent ways. Both ways require the weights of the stocks in the portfolio. In one method, compute the required return for each stock and then use the weights to form the portfolio required return. The other solution uses the weights to compute the portfolio beta. This portfolio beta is used to compute the portfolio required return. The solution below shows the portfolio beta approach. For the portfolio, determine the total value of the portfolio and the weights of each stock in the portfolio:Total value = $40.80×100 + $30.10×150 + $57.40×75 + $23.80×200 = $17,660Amazon.com weight = $40.80×100 / $17,660 = 23.1%Family Dollar weight = $30.10×150 / $17,660 = 25.6%McKesson weight = $57.40×75 / $17,660 = 24.4%Schering-Plough weight = $23.80×200 / $17,660 = 26.9%Now compute the portfolio beta = 0.231×3.8 + 0.256×1.2 + 0.244×0.4 + 0.269×0.5 = 1.42So the portfolio’s required return = 3.5%+1.42×(12%−3.5%) = 15.5%

LG3 10-28 Portfolio Beta and Required Return You hold the positions in the table below. What is the beta of your portfolio? If you expect the market to earn 12 percent and the risk-free rate is 3.5 percent, what is the required return of the portfolio?

Price Shares BetaAdvanced Micro Devices

$14.70 200 4.2

FedEx Corp $120.00 50 1.1

10-11

Page 12: CHAPTER 4 – ANALYSIS OF SINGLE CASH FLOWS

Chapter 10, Solutions Cornett, Adair, and Nofsinger

Microsoft $28.90 150 0.7Sara Lee Corp $17.25 200 0.5

This problem can be solved two different and equivalent ways. Both ways require the weights of the stocks in the portfolio. In one method, compute the required return for each stock and then use the weights to form the portfolio required return. The other solution uses the weights to compute the portfolio beta. This portfolio beta is used to compute the portfolio required return. The solution below shows the portfolio beta approach. For the portfolio, determine the total value of the portfolio and the weights of each stock in the portfolio:Total value = $14.70×200 + $120.00×50 + $28.90×150 + $17.25×200 = $16,725Advanced Micro Devices weight = $14.70×200 / $16,725 = 17.6%FedEx Corp weight = $120.00×50 / $16,725 = 35.9%Microsoft weight = $28.90×150 / $16,725 = 25.9%Sara Lee Corp weight = $17.25×200 / $16,725 = 20.6%Now compute the portfolio beta = 0.176×4.2 + 0.359×1.1 + 0.259×0.7 + 0.206×0.5 = 1.42So the portfolio’s required return = 3.5%+1.42×(12%−3.5%) = 15.5%

LG3&7 10-29 Required Return Using the information in the table, compute the required return for each company using both CAPM and the constant growth model. Compare and discuss the results. Assume that the market portfolio will earn 12 percent and the risk-free rate is 3.5 percent.

Price Upcoming Dividend

Growth Beta

US Bancorp $36.55 $1.60 10.0% 0.8Praxair $64.75 $1.12 11.0% 0.7Eastman Kodak $24.95 $1.00 4.5% 2.0

First use CAPM to determine each firm’s required return: US Bancorp required return = 3.5% + 0.8 × (12% − 3.5%) = 10.3%Praxair required return = 3.5% + 0.7 × (12% − 3.5%) = 9.45%Eastman Kodak required return = 3.5% + 2.0 × (12% − 3.5%) = 20.5%

Now compute the required return using the constant growth rate model:

US Bancorp required return =

Praxair required return =

Eastman Kodak required return =

The US Bancorp CAPM estimate of 10.3% is low compared to the 14.4% constant growth rate model estimate. The CAPM estimate for Praxair is high compared to the constant

10-12

Page 13: CHAPTER 4 – ANALYSIS OF SINGLE CASH FLOWS

Chapter 10, Solutions Cornett, Adair, and Nofsinger

growth rate model estimate. The CAPM estimate for Eastman Kodak is more than double that of the constant growth rate model.

LG3&7 10-30 Required Return Using the information in the table, compute the required return for each company using both CAPM and the constant growth model. Compare and discuss the results. Assume that the market portfolio will earn 11 percent and the risk-free rate is 4 percent.

Price Upcoming Dividend

Growth Beta

Estee Lauder $47.40 $0.60 11.7% 0.75Kimco Realty $52.10 $1.54 8.0% 1.3Nordstrom $5.25 $0.50 14.6% 2.2

First use CAPM to determine each firm’s required return: Estee Lauder required return = 4% + 0.75 × (11% − 4%) = 9.25%Kimco Realty required return = 4% + 1.3 × (11% − 4%) = 13.1%Nordstrom required return = 4% + 2.2 × (11% − 4%) = 19.4%

Now compute the required return using the constant growth rate model:

Estee Lauder required return =

Kimco Realty required return =

Nordstrom required return =

The Estee Lauder CAPM estimate of 9.25% is low compared to the 13% constant growth rate model estimate. The CAPM estimate for Kimco Realty is high compared to the constant growth rate model estimate. The CAPM estimate for Nordstrom is a little lower than that of the constant growth rate model.

10-13

Page 14: CHAPTER 4 – ANALYSIS OF SINGLE CASH FLOWS

Chapter 10, Solutions Cornett, Adair, and Nofsinger

10-31 Excel Problem As discussed in the text, beta estimates for one firm will vary depending on various factors like, the time over which the estimation is conducted, the market portfolio proxy, and the return intervals. You will demonstrate this variation using returns for Microsoft. A. Using all 45 monthly returns for Microsoft and the three stock market indices, compute Microsoft’s beta using the S&P 500 Index as the market proxy. Then compute the beta using the DJIA and the Nasdaq indices as the market portfolio proxy. Compare the three beta estimates. B. Now estimate the beta using only the most recent 30 monthly returns and the S&P 500 Index. Compare the beta estimate to the estimate in part A when using the S&P 500 Index and all 45 monthly returns.

Date MSFT S&P500 DJIA Nasdaq Date MSFT S&P500 DJIA Nasdaq Date MSFT S&P500 DJIA NasdaqJun 2007 4.45% 3.07% 4.04% 4.19% Mar 2006 -11.22% 1.22% 2.32% -0.74% Dec 2004 -1.66% -2.53% -2.72% -5.20%

May 2007 -3.98% -1.78% -1.61% -0.05% Feb 2006 1.25% 1.11% 1.05% 2.56% Nov 2004 -0.31% 3.25% 3.40% 3.75%Apr 2007 2.85% 3.25% 4.32% 3.15% Jan 2006 -4.21% 0.05% 1.18% -1.06% Oct 2004 6.80% 3.86% 3.99% 6.17%Mar 2007 7.42% 4.33% 5.74% 4.27% Dec 2005 7.61% 2.55% 1.37% 4.56% Sep 2004 1.17% 1.40% -0.52% 4.12%Feb 2007 -1.07% 1.00% 0.70% 0.23% Nov 2005 -5.50% -0.10% -0.82% -1.23% Aug 2004 1.31% 0.94% -0.92% 3.20%Jan 2007 -8.38% -2.18% -2.80% -1.94% Oct 2005 8.01% 3.52% 3.50% 5.31% Jul 2004 -3.89% 0.23% 0.34% -2.61%

Dec 2006 3.34% 1.41% 1.27% 2.01% Sep 2005 -0.12% -1.77% -1.22% -1.46% Jun 2004 -0.28% -3.43% -2.83% -7.83%Nov 2006 1.71% 1.26% 1.97% -0.68% Aug 2005 -6.02% 0.69% 0.83% -0.02% May 2004 8.90% 1.80% 2.42% 3.07%Oct 2006 2.60% 1.65% 1.17% 2.75% Jul 2005 7.22% -1.12% -1.50% -1.50% Apr 2004 0.40% 1.21% -0.36% 3.47%Sep 2006 4.99% 3.15% 3.44% 4.79% Jun 2005 3.10% 3.60% 3.56% 6.22% Mar 2004 4.82% -1.68% -1.28% -3.71%Aug 2006 6.41% 2.46% 2.62% 3.42% May 2005 -3.70% -0.01% -1.84% -0.54% Feb 2004 -6.05% -1.64% -2.14% -1.75%

Jul 2006 7.21% 2.13% 1.75% 4.41% Apr 2005 2.28% 3.00% 2.70% 7.63% Jan 2004 -4.05% 1.22% 0.91% -1.76%Jun 2006 3.26% 0.51% 0.32% -3.71% Mar 2005 4.69% -2.01% -2.96% -3.88% Dec 2003 1.01% 1.73% 0.33% 3.13%

May 2006 2.86% 0.01% -0.16% -0.31% Feb 2005 -3.93% -1.91% -2.44% -2.56% Nov 2003 6.47% 5.08% 6.86% 2.20%Apr 2006 -5.86% -3.09% -1.75% -6.19% Jan 2005 -3.97% 1.89% 2.63% -0.52% Oct 2003 -1.64% 0.71% -0.19% 1.45%

10-14

Page 15: CHAPTER 4 – ANALYSIS OF SINGLE CASH FLOWS

Chapter 10, Solutions Cornett, Adair, and Nofsinger

C. Estimate Microsoft’s beta using the quarterly data returns below. Compare the estimate to the ones from part A and B.

Date MSFT S&P500Q2 2007 3.15% 4.53%Q1 2007 -2.64% 3.07%Q4 2006 7.85% 4.38%Q3 2006 19.76% 7.93%Q2 2006 0.00% -2.59%Q1 2006

-13.90% 2.39%

Q4 2005 9.84% 6.05%Q3 2005 0.64% -2.20%Q2 2005 1.55% 6.68%Q1 2005 -3.42% -2.07%Q4 2004 4.70% 4.52%Q3 2004 -1.50% 2.59%Q2 2004 9.02% -0.50%Q1 2004 -5.52% -2.11%Q4 2003 5.79% 7.65%

A. Beta estimates using different market proxies and 45 months. The estimate is from the Excel Slope function.

S&P500 DJIA NasdaqBeta = 1.206 0.952 0.716

Microsoft’s beta is high when compared to S&P 500 type companies and low compared to the tech compares in the Nasdaq.

10-15

Page 16: CHAPTER 4 – ANALYSIS OF SINGLE CASH FLOWS

Chapter 10, Solutions Cornett, Adair, and Nofsinger

B. Beta estimate using 30 months.S&P500

Beta = 1.420

The beta estimate is larger using the most recent 30 months compared to the full 45 months.

C. Beta estimate using quarterly returns.S&P500

Beta = 1.085This Microsoft beta estimate is the smallest using the quarterly S&P 500 market portfolio. Note that the assumptions used can make a large difference in the beta estimate. This makes beta difficult to use in practice.

Research It!Find a Beta

Using beta as a risk measure has been fully integrated into corporate finance and the investment industry. You can obtain a beta for most companies at many financial websites. Sites that list a beta include: Hoovers (in the Market Data section), MSN Money (in the Company Report section), Yahoo! Finance (in the Key Statistics section), and Zacks (follow the Detailed Quote link). Obtain the beta for your favorite company from several different websites. Are the values you obtain similar? If they are not, why might they be different?

(hoovers.com, moneycentral.msn.com, finance.yahoo.com, www.zacks.com)

SOLUTION: For General Electric (GE), I found:Yahoo! Finance beta was 0.59. MSN Money shows a beta of 0.76. Hoovers lists a beta of 0.8. Zacks reports a beta of 0.83.The beta sources may use (i) different market portfolios, (ii) different time periods, or (iii) different time increments (annual returns versus months, weeks, etc.).

Integrated Mini Case: AT&T’s Beta

When you go on the Web to find a firm’s beta, you do not know how recently it was computed, what index was used as a proxy for the market portfolio, or which time series of returns the calculations used. Earlier in this chapter, it was shown that when we went on the Web to find a beta for AT&T, we found the following: Hoovers (1.5), MSN Money (1.52), Yahoo! Finance (0.50), and Zacks (1.52).

10-16

Page 17: CHAPTER 4 – ANALYSIS OF SINGLE CASH FLOWS

Chapter 10, Solutions Cornett, Adair, and Nofsinger

An alternative is to compute beta yourself. A common estimation procedure is to use 60 months of return data and to use the S&P500 Index as the market portfolio. You can obtain price data for a company and for the S&P500 Index for free from websites like Yahoo! Finance. Using monthly prices, you can compute the monthly returns, as (Pn − Pn-

1)÷Pn-1. Below are 60 monthly returns for AT&T and the S&P500 Index. You can use these returns to compute AT&T’s beta. A spreadsheet, like Excel, can run a regression (go to Tool menu, select Data Analysis, and then Regression). Select AT&T returns as the Y Variable and S&P500 Index return as the X Variable. The coefficient for the X Variable is the beta estimate. The regression will provide all the statistical information you might like. However, if you only want beta, you can simply use the SLOPE function in Excel. Or, you may have learned to run a regression using statistical software.

Date AT&TS&P500

Index Date AT&TS&P500

Index Date AT&TS&P500

IndexJun 2007 -2.26% 3.07% Oct 05 4.45% 3.52% Feb 04 2.22% -1.64%

May 2007 0.39% -1.78% Sep 05 0.85% -1.77% Jan 04 -5.83% 1.22%Apr 2007 6.77% 3.25% Aug 05 -0.45% 0.69% Dec 03 -1.04% 1.73%Mar 2007 -0.90% 4.33% Jul 05 -1.54% -1.12% Nov 03 11.95% 5.08%Feb 2007 7.14% 1.00% Jun 05 4.36% 3.60% Oct 03 -2.89% 0.71%Jan 2007 -2.22% -2.18% May 05 1.58% -0.01% Sep 03 9.61% 5.50%

Dec 2006 6.36% 1.41% Apr 05 -1.78% 3.00% Aug 03 -0.96% -1.19%Nov 2006 5.42% 1.26% Mar 05 1.82% -2.01% Jul 03 -3.83% 1.79%Oct 2006 -0.97% 1.65% Feb 05 -1.51% -1.91% Jun 03 -7.25% 1.62%Sep 2006 6.27% 3.15% Jan 05 1.25% 1.89% May 03 0.38% 1.13%Aug 2006 4.59% 2.46% Dec 04 -6.60% -2.53% Apr 03 8.97% 5.09%

Jul 2006 3.81% 2.13% Nov 04 2.35% 3.25% Mar 03 18.28% 8.10%Jun 2006 8.82% 0.51% Oct 04 -0.35% 3.86% Feb 03 -3.61% 0.84%

May 2006 7.02% 0.01% Sep 04 -1.53% 1.40% Jan 03 -14.85% -1.70%Apr 2006 -0.59% -3.09% Aug 04 0.61% 0.94% Dec 02 -9.07% -2.74%Mar 2006 -1.86% 1.22% Jul 04 1.79% 0.23% Nov 02 -4.88% -6.03%Feb 2006 -1.97% 1.11% Jun 04 5.86% -3.43% Oct 02 11.08% 5.71%Jan 2006 6.29% 0.05% May 04 2.32% 1.80% Sep 02 29.35% 8.64%

Dec 2005 7.40% 2.55% Apr 04 -4.79% 1.21% Aug 02 -18.76% -11.00%Nov 2005 -1.66% -0.10% Mar 04 2.70% -1.68% Jul 02 -10.55% 0.49%

a. Compute AT&T’s beta using the above returns.b. Compare your estimate with the ones found on the Web as listed above.c. How different will be the required returns using these betas? Compute required

return using each beta (assume that the risk free rate is 5 percent and the market return will be 13 percent).

SOLUTION: a. Excel Regression output.

10-17

Page 18: CHAPTER 4 – ANALYSIS OF SINGLE CASH FLOWS

Chapter 10, Solutions Cornett, Adair, and Nofsinger

SUMMARY OUTPUT

Regression StatisticsMultiple R 0.679405R Square 0.461591Adjusted R Square 0.452308Standard Error 0.053805Observations 60

ANOVA

  df SS MS FSignificance

FRegression 1 0.143951 0.143951 49.72478 2.4E-09Residual 58 0.167908 0.002895Total 59 0.311859      

  CoefficientsStandard

Error t Stat P-value Lower 95%Upper 95%

Lower 95.0%

Upper 95.0%

Intercept -0.00177 0.007252 -0.24387 0.808194 -0.01629 0.012748 -0.01629 0.012748X Variable 1 1.568504 0.222433 7.05158 2.4E-09 1.123256 2.013752 1.123256 2.013752

b. The beta estimate from the regression is 1.57. This estimate is similar to the ones from Hoovers (1.5), MSN Money (1.52), and Zacks (1.52). The Yahoo! Finance (0.50) estimate still seems very low.

c. Required returns using these beta estimates:

Excel estimate = 5% + 1.57 × (13% − 5%) = 17.56%Hoovers estimate = 5% + 1.5 × (13% − 5%) = 17.0%MSN Money and Zacks estimate = 5% + 1.52 × (13% − 5%) = 17.16%Yahoo! Finance estimate = 5% + 0.50 × (13% − 5%) = 9.0%

All the required return estimates are very similar except the Yahoo! Estimate.

10-18