chapter 2 special theory of relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · fall 2018 prof. sergio b....

105
Special Theory of Relativity Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 1 CHAPTER 2

Upload: others

Post on 02-Aug-2021

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Special Theory of Relativity

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 1

CHAPTER 2

Page 2: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Topics

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2

• 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference• 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental Inconsistencies• 2.2 The Michelson-Morley Experiment• 2.3 Einstein’s Postulates• 2.4 The Lorentz Transformation• 2.5 Time Dilation and Length Contraction• 2.6 Addition of Velocities• 2.7 Experimental Verification• 2.8 Twin Paradox• 2.9 Space-Time• 2.10 Doppler Effect• 2.11 Relativistic Momentum• 2.12 Relativistic Energy• 2.13 Computations in Modern Physics• 2.14 Electromagnetism and Relativity

Page 3: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

How to describe an event?

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 3

The precise description of an event must be

characterized by its location in space 𝒓𝒓 and its

time 𝑡𝑡.

𝑧𝑧

The set of (calibrated) rulers and (synchronized) clocks form a frame of reference that can be used to characterize

events.

Page 4: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

What is an Inertial Frame of Reference ?

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 4

Such a frame of reference is established when a body subjected to a null net external force, 𝑭𝑭𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏 = 𝟎𝟎,

is observed to move with constant velocity (either rectilinear motion at constant speed or at rest).

𝒂𝒂

𝑚𝑚𝒈𝒈 + 𝑻𝑻 = 𝑭𝑭𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏 = 𝑚𝑚 𝒂𝒂

𝒗𝒗 = 𝟎𝟎 𝒗𝒗 = 𝒄𝒄𝒄𝒄𝒏𝒏𝒄𝒄𝒏𝒏𝒂𝒂𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒂𝒂 = 𝟎𝟎 𝒂𝒂 = 𝟎𝟎

One in which Newton’s laws are valid !!

𝑭𝑭𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏 = 𝟎𝟎 𝑭𝑭𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏 = 𝟎𝟎

Page 5: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

A non-inertial observer reaches conclusions that don’t agree with

Newton’s laws

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 5

𝒂𝒂

𝒂𝒂′ = −𝒂𝒂

𝒂𝒂′ = 0

𝒂𝒂′ = −𝒂𝒂

𝑭𝑭𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏 ≠ 𝟎𝟎

𝑭𝑭𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏 = 𝟎𝟎 𝑭𝑭𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏 = 𝟎𝟎

𝒂𝒂′ 𝒂𝒂′

Page 6: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Therefore, we must use an inertial frame of reference to describe the laws of Mechanics

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 6

Page 7: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 7

Once we have found one inertial frame of reference (K), then any frame of reference moving at constant velocity 𝒗𝒗𝒄𝒄 with respect to K is also an inertial frame of reference.

Q: Well, how many inertial frames of reference are out there?

A: An infinite number.

Page 8: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Proof

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 8

• Consider that K is at rest.

𝑥𝑥′ = 𝑥𝑥 − 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜,𝑥𝑥 𝑡𝑡

𝑦𝑦′ = 𝑦𝑦 − 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜,𝑦𝑦 𝑡𝑡

𝑧𝑧′ = 𝑧𝑧 − 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜,𝑥𝑥 𝑡𝑡

𝒓𝒓′ = 𝒓𝒓 − 𝒗𝒗𝒄𝒄 𝑡𝑡

𝒓𝒓′𝒓𝒓

𝒗𝒗𝒄𝒄 𝑡𝑡

𝒂𝒂′ = 𝒂𝒂

𝒗𝒗′ = 𝒗𝒗 − 𝒗𝒗𝒄𝒄

𝑡𝑡′ = 𝑡𝑡

K

K’

• Consider that the two frames of reference coincide at 𝑡𝑡 = 0.

• Consider that K’ is moving with constant velocity𝒗𝒗𝒄𝒄 with respect to K.

Page 9: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 9

• If Newton’s laws are valid in one frame of reference (K), then they are also valid in another frame of reference (K’) moving at a uniform velocity relative to the first system.

𝒂𝒂′ = 𝒂𝒂 𝒎𝒎′ 𝒂𝒂′ = 𝒎𝒎′ 𝒂𝒂 𝑭𝑭′ = 𝑭𝑭𝒎𝒎′ = 𝒎𝒎

• So, both are inertial frames of reference.

Page 10: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Principle of (Classical) Relativity

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 10

𝒓𝒓′ = 𝒓𝒓 − 𝒗𝒗𝒄𝒄 𝑡𝑡

• The laws of Mechanics (Newton’s laws) are the same in all inertial frames of reference

Galilean Transformation

Inertial frames of reference are related by:

• All inertial frames of reference are equivalent.

𝑡𝑡′ = 𝑡𝑡

Page 11: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

2.1 Conceptual and Experimental Inconsistencies

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 11

Page 12: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Conceptual Inconsistencies:

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 12

Although Newton’s laws of motion had the same form under the Galilean transformation, Maxwell’s equations did not.

𝑭𝑭 = 𝑞𝑞 𝑬𝑬 + 𝑞𝑞 𝒗𝒗 × 𝑩𝑩

�𝑆𝑆𝑬𝑬 𝒓𝒓 .𝒅𝒅𝑨𝑨 =

𝑄𝑄𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝜖𝜖0

�𝑆𝑆𝑩𝑩 𝒓𝒓 .𝒅𝒅𝑨𝑨 = 0

�𝐶𝐶𝑬𝑬 𝒓𝒓 .𝒅𝒅𝒄𝒄 = −

𝑑𝑑Φ𝐵𝐵

𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡

�𝐶𝐶𝑩𝑩 𝒓𝒓 .𝒅𝒅𝒄𝒄 = 𝜇𝜇𝑜𝑜 𝐼𝐼 + 𝜇𝜇𝑜𝑜 𝜖𝜖𝑜𝑜

𝑑𝑑Φ𝐸𝐸

𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡

Page 13: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Experimental Inconsistencies:

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 13

In Maxwell’s theory, the speed of light in terms of the permeability and permittivity of free space was given by:

𝜕𝜕2𝐸𝐸𝜕𝜕𝑥𝑥2

= 𝜖𝜖𝑜𝑜 𝜇𝜇𝑜𝑜𝜕𝜕2𝐸𝐸𝜕𝜕𝑡𝑡2

𝜕𝜕2𝐵𝐵𝜕𝜕𝑥𝑥2

= 𝜖𝜖𝑜𝑜 𝜇𝜇𝑜𝑜𝜕𝜕2𝐵𝐵𝜕𝜕𝑡𝑡2

𝑐𝑐 =1𝜖𝜖𝑜𝑜 𝜇𝜇𝑜𝑜

Page 14: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

The carrier medium for light, ether:

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 14

Following the tradition of the time (that every wave has a medium to carry its propagation) the luminiferous ether was considered as the carrier medium for light propagation, where 𝑐𝑐 = 1

𝜖𝜖𝑜𝑜 𝜇𝜇𝑜𝑜

It also had to have an elasticity to support the high velocity of light waves

Ether had to have such a low density that the planets could move through it without loss of energy

Page 15: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

An Absolute Inertial Frame of Reference

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 15

• Ether was proposed as an absolute reference system in which the speed of light was this constant and from which other measurements could be made.

• The Michelson-Morley experiment was an attempt to show the existence of ether.

Page 16: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

2.2 The Michelson-Morley Experiment

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 16

Albert Michelson (1852–1931)was the first U.S. citizen toreceive the Nobel Prize forPhysics (1907). He built anextremely precise devicecalled an interferometer tomeasure the minute phasedifference between two lightwaves traveling in mutuallyorthogonal directions.

Page 17: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

The Michelson Interferometer

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 17

Page 18: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

How does it work ?

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 18

1. AC is parallel to the motion of the Earth inducing an “ether wind”

2. Light from source S is split by mirror A and travels to mirrors C and D in mutually perpendicular directions

3. After reflection the beams recombine at A slightly out of phase due to the “ether wind” as viewed by telescope E.

Page 19: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

A Typical Interference Pattern

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 19

Page 20: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

The Analysis

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 20

Time 𝑡𝑡1 from A to C and back:

Time 𝑡𝑡2 from A to D and back:

So that the change in time is:

assuming the Galilean Transformation !!

𝑡𝑡1 =𝑙𝑙1

𝑐𝑐 + 𝑣𝑣+

𝑙𝑙1𝑐𝑐 − 𝑣𝑣

𝑡𝑡2 =𝑙𝑙2

𝑐𝑐2 − 𝑣𝑣2+

𝑙𝑙2𝑐𝑐2 − 𝑣𝑣2

∆𝑡𝑡 = 𝑡𝑡2 − 𝑡𝑡1 =2 𝑙𝑙2𝑐𝑐

1

1 − 𝑣𝑣2𝑐𝑐2

−2 𝑙𝑙1𝑐𝑐

1

1 − 𝑣𝑣2𝑐𝑐2

=2 𝑙𝑙1𝑐𝑐

1

1 − 𝑣𝑣2𝑐𝑐2

=2 𝑐𝑐 𝑙𝑙1𝑐𝑐2 − 𝑣𝑣2

=2 𝑙𝑙2𝑐𝑐

1

1 − 𝑣𝑣2𝑐𝑐2

Page 21: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

The Analysis (continued)

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 21

Upon rotating the apparatus by 90º, the optical path lengths 𝑙𝑙1 and 𝑙𝑙2 are interchanged producing a different change in time:

∆𝑡𝑡′ = 𝑡𝑡′2 − 𝑡𝑡′1 =2 𝑙𝑙2𝑐𝑐

1

1 − 𝑣𝑣2𝑐𝑐2

−2 𝑙𝑙1𝑐𝑐

1

1 − 𝑣𝑣2𝑐𝑐2

∆𝑡𝑡 = 𝑡𝑡2 − 𝑡𝑡1 =2 𝑙𝑙2𝑐𝑐

1

1 − 𝑣𝑣2𝑐𝑐2

−2 𝑙𝑙1𝑐𝑐

1

1 − 𝑣𝑣2𝑐𝑐2

Page 22: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Difference in times upon rotation:

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 22

∆𝑡𝑡′ − ∆𝑡𝑡 =2 𝑙𝑙1 + 𝑙𝑙2

𝑐𝑐1

1 − 𝑣𝑣2𝑐𝑐2

−1

1 − 𝑣𝑣2𝑐𝑐2

≅𝑙𝑙1 + 𝑙𝑙2 𝑣𝑣2

𝑐𝑐3

Page 23: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Increasing the pathlength:

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 23

Page 24: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Crunching the numbers:

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 24

𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑐𝑐𝑡𝑡𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓 𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓 𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓 𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑡𝑡𝑖𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑐𝑐𝑖𝑖 𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑖 =7 × 10−16 𝑠𝑠2 × 10−15 𝑠𝑠

≅ 0.4

𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑠𝑠𝑡𝑡𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑖𝑚𝑚𝑖𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑡𝑡 𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑓𝑓𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑖𝑡𝑡𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓 ≅ 0.01

𝑣𝑣 = 3 × 104 𝑚𝑚/𝑠𝑠

𝑐𝑐 = 3 × 108 𝑚𝑚/𝑠𝑠

𝑙𝑙1 ≈ 𝑙𝑙2 = 11 𝑚𝑚

𝑇𝑇 =𝜆𝜆𝑐𝑐

∆𝑡𝑡′ − ∆𝑡𝑡 =𝑙𝑙1 + 𝑙𝑙2 𝑣𝑣2

𝑐𝑐3= 7 × 10−16 𝑠𝑠

𝜆𝜆 = 589 × 10−9 𝑚𝑚

𝑐𝑐 = 3 × 108 𝑚𝑚/𝑠𝑠=

589 × 10−9 𝑚𝑚3 × 108 𝑚𝑚/𝑠𝑠

= 2 × 10−15 𝑠𝑠

Page 25: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 25

“The Experiments on the relative motion of the earth and ether

have been completed and the result decidedly negative. The

expected deviation of the interference fringes from the zero

should have been 0.40 of a fringe – the maximum displacement

was 0.02 and the average much less than 0.01 – and then not in

the right place. As displacement is proportional to squares of the

relative velocities it follows that if the ether does slip past the

relative velocity is less than one sixth of the earth’s velocity.”

Albert Abraham Michelson, 1887

Page 26: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

2.3 Einstein’s Two Postulates

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 26

1. The principle of relativity: The laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of reference. There is no way to detect absolute motion and no preferred inertial system exists.

2. The constancy of the speed of light:Observers in all inertial frames of reference measure the same value for the speed of light when propagating in vacuum.

Page 27: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Consequences:

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 27

Source and Observer at rest:

Observer in motion with respect to the Source:

c

Source in motion with respect to the Observer:c

c

v

-v

Page 28: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Consequences

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 28

In Newtonian physics, we previously assumed that 𝒏𝒏 = 𝒏𝒏’.

Einstein realized that events considered simultaneous in K may not be in K’.

• Therefore K and K’ would always agree if two events happen at the same time (simultaneous) or not.

Page 29: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Because speed of light is absolutethen simultaneity is relative

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 29

K’

K K

K’

Page 30: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 30

• Two events that are simultaneous in one reference frame (K) are not necessarily simultaneous in another reference frame (K’) moving with respect to the first frame.

• This suggests that each coordinate system must have its own set of observers with their own set of synchronized clocks.

Page 31: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

2.4 Lorentz Transformations

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 31

The special set of linear transformations that preserve the constancy of the speed of light between inertial observers.

Page 32: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Two inertial frames of reference

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 32

𝓞𝓞′

As seen by 𝓚𝓚

𝓞𝓞𝒗𝒗𝑜𝑜

𝓚𝓚 and 𝓚𝓚’1. The axes along (𝑥𝑥,𝑦𝑦, 𝑧𝑧) are parallel to the corresponding

axes along (𝑥𝑥𝑥,𝑦𝑦𝑥, 𝑧𝑧𝑥).

𝓞𝓞′𝓞𝓞−𝒗𝒗𝑜𝑜

As seen by 𝓚𝓚’

2. The relative motion between the two inertial frames of reference is along the x-axis (and x’-axis).

3. Consider that the origins 𝓞𝓞 and 𝓞𝓞′ of the two systems coincide at 𝑡𝑡 = 𝑡𝑡𝑥 = 0

Page 33: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

As seen by 𝓚𝓚 ∶

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 33

𝓚𝓚: (𝑥𝑥, 𝑡𝑡)

𝒗𝒗𝑜𝑜

𝓚𝓚′: (𝑥𝑥′, 𝑡𝑡′)

𝒗𝒗𝑜𝑜

𝒗𝒗𝑜𝑜

𝒗𝒗𝑜𝑜

𝒗𝒗𝑜𝑜

Page 34: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

As seen by 𝓚𝓚′:

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 34

𝓚𝓚′: (𝑥𝑥′, 𝑡𝑡′)

𝓚𝓚: (𝑥𝑥, 𝑡𝑡)

− 𝒗𝒗𝑜𝑜

− 𝒗𝒗𝑜𝑜

− 𝒗𝒗𝑜𝑜

− 𝒗𝒗𝑜𝑜

− 𝒗𝒗𝑜𝑜

Page 35: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

As seen by 𝓚𝓚:

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 35

• A flashbulb goes off at the origins when 𝑡𝑡 = 𝑡𝑡𝑥 = 0.

𝒗𝒗𝑜𝑜

Page 36: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

As seen by 𝓚𝓚′:

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 36

• A flashbulb goes off at the origins when 𝒏𝒏 = 𝒏𝒏𝑥 = 𝟎𝟎.

−𝒗𝒗𝑜𝑜

Page 37: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 37

• According to Postulate 2, the speed of light will be c in both systems !!

𝓞𝓞′𝓞𝓞

𝑥𝑥 2 + 𝑦𝑦 2 + 𝑧𝑧 2 = 𝑐𝑐2 𝑡𝑡 2 𝑥𝑥′ 2 + 𝑦𝑦′ 2 + 𝑧𝑧′ 2 = 𝑐𝑐2 𝑡𝑡′ 2

𝓚𝓚𝓚𝓚′

• The wavefronts observed in both systems must be spherical with respect to their own coordinates and time.

Page 38: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 38

𝑦𝑦 = 𝑦𝑦′

𝑧𝑧 = 𝑧𝑧′

as in Galilean transformation

𝑥𝑥 2 + 𝑦𝑦 2 + 𝑧𝑧 2 − 𝑐𝑐2 𝑡𝑡 2 = 0

0 = 𝑥𝑥′ 2 + 𝑦𝑦′ 2 + 𝑧𝑧′ 2 − 𝑐𝑐2 𝑡𝑡′ 2

𝑥𝑥 2 − 𝑐𝑐2 𝑡𝑡 2 = 𝑥𝑥′ 2 − 𝑐𝑐2 𝑡𝑡′ 2

Page 39: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 39

𝑥𝑥′ = 𝑥𝑥 − 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜 𝑡𝑡

𝑥𝑥 = 𝑥𝑥′ + 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜 𝑡𝑡′

𝛾𝛾

𝛾𝛾due to symmetry

linear modification

= 𝛾𝛾 𝛾𝛾 𝑥𝑥 − 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜 𝑡𝑡 + 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜 𝑡𝑡′

𝑡𝑡′ = 1𝛾𝛾 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜

1 − 𝛾𝛾2 𝑥𝑥 + 𝛾𝛾 𝑡𝑡solve for:

in Galilean transformation

Page 40: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 40

𝑥𝑥 2 − 𝑐𝑐2 𝑡𝑡 2 = 𝑥𝑥′ 2 − 𝑐𝑐2 𝑡𝑡′ 2

𝑥𝑥′ = 𝛾𝛾 𝑥𝑥 − 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜 𝑡𝑡 𝑡𝑡′ = 1𝛾𝛾 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜

1 − 𝛾𝛾2 𝑥𝑥 + 𝛾𝛾 𝑡𝑡

Page 41: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 41

𝛾𝛾 =1

1 − 𝛽𝛽2𝛽𝛽 ≡

𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜𝑐𝑐

𝑥𝑥 2: 1 = γ2 −𝑐𝑐2

𝛾𝛾2 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜2 1 − 𝛾𝛾2 2 1

1 − 𝛾𝛾2= −

𝑐𝑐2

𝛾𝛾2 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜2

1𝛾𝛾2

− 1 = −𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜2

𝑐𝑐2

𝑡𝑡 2: −𝑐𝑐2 = 𝛾𝛾2 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜2 − 𝑐𝑐2 𝛾𝛾2

1𝛾𝛾2

= 1 −𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜2

𝑐𝑐2

2 𝑥𝑥 𝑡𝑡: 0 = −𝛾𝛾2 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜 − 𝑐𝑐21𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜

1 − 𝛾𝛾2 𝛾𝛾2 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜 = −𝑐𝑐21𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜

1 − 𝛾𝛾2 −𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜2

𝑐𝑐2 =1𝛾𝛾2

− 1

Page 42: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Lorentz Transformations:

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 42

𝑥𝑥′ = 𝛾𝛾 𝑥𝑥 − 𝛾𝛾 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜 𝑡𝑡

𝑡𝑡′= −𝛾𝛾 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜𝑐𝑐2

𝑥𝑥 + 𝛾𝛾 𝑡𝑡

𝛽𝛽 ≡𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜𝑐𝑐

𝛾𝛾 =1

1 − 𝛽𝛽2

Page 43: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Inverse Lorentz Transformations:

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 43

𝑥𝑥 = 𝛾𝛾 𝑥𝑥′ + 𝛾𝛾 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜 𝑡𝑡′

𝑡𝑡 =𝛾𝛾 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜𝑐𝑐2

𝑥𝑥′ + 𝛾𝛾 𝑡𝑡′

𝛽𝛽 ≡𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜𝑐𝑐

𝛾𝛾 =1

1 − 𝛽𝛽2

Page 44: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Relativistic Factor 𝛾𝛾

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 44

𝛽𝛽 =

Page 45: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

2.5 Time Dilation and Length Contraction

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 45

Page 46: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 46

Time Dilation:

𝒗𝒗𝑜𝑜

Page 47: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Time Dilation:

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 47

𝑡𝑡′1 = −𝛾𝛾 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜𝑐𝑐2

𝑥𝑥1 + 𝛾𝛾 𝑡𝑡1

𝑡𝑡′1

𝑡𝑡′2 = −𝛾𝛾 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜𝑐𝑐2

𝑥𝑥2 + 𝛾𝛾 𝑡𝑡2

𝑡𝑡′= −𝛾𝛾 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜𝑐𝑐2

𝑥𝑥 + 𝛾𝛾 𝑡𝑡

𝑥𝑥1 = 𝑥𝑥2

Page 48: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Time Dilation & Proper Time:

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 48

𝑡𝑡′1 𝑡𝑡′2

𝑡𝑡′2 − 𝑡𝑡′1 = 𝛾𝛾 𝑡𝑡2 − 𝑡𝑡1𝑡𝑡2 − 𝑡𝑡1 = proper time,

time duration measured at same location

Page 49: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 49

Length Contraction:

𝒗𝒗𝑜𝑜

Page 50: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Length Contraction:

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 50

𝑡𝑡′2 = 𝑡𝑡′1

𝑥𝑥′2 − 𝑥𝑥′1=1𝛾𝛾

𝑥𝑥2 − 𝑥𝑥1

𝑥𝑥2 − 𝑥𝑥1 = proper length, length measured at rest

𝑥𝑥 = 𝛾𝛾 𝑥𝑥′ + 𝛾𝛾 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜 𝑡𝑡′

𝑥𝑥1 = 𝛾𝛾 𝑥𝑥′1 + 𝛾𝛾 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜 𝑡𝑡′1 𝑥𝑥2 = 𝛾𝛾 𝑥𝑥′2 + 𝛾𝛾 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜 𝑡𝑡′2

Page 51: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 51

Page 52: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 52

Page 53: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

2.6 Addition of Velocities

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 53

Page 54: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Taking the differentials:

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 54

𝑥𝑥′ = 𝛾𝛾 𝑥𝑥 − 𝛾𝛾 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜 𝑡𝑡

𝑡𝑡′= −𝛾𝛾 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜𝑐𝑐2

𝑥𝑥 + 𝛾𝛾 𝑡𝑡

𝑑𝑑𝑥𝑥′ = 𝛾𝛾 𝑑𝑑𝑥𝑥 − 𝛾𝛾 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜 𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡

𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡′= −𝛾𝛾 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜𝑐𝑐2

𝑑𝑑𝑥𝑥 + 𝛾𝛾 𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡

𝑦𝑦′ = 𝑦𝑦

𝑧𝑧′ = 𝑧𝑧

𝑑𝑑𝑦𝑦′ = 𝑑𝑑𝑦𝑦

𝑑𝑑𝑧𝑧′ = 𝑑𝑑𝑧𝑧

Page 55: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Along x-axis

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 55

𝑑𝑑𝑥𝑥′ = 𝛾𝛾 𝑑𝑑𝑥𝑥 − 𝛾𝛾 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜 𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡

𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡′= −𝛾𝛾 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜𝑐𝑐2

𝑑𝑑𝑥𝑥 + 𝛾𝛾 𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡

𝑑𝑑𝑥𝑥′

𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡′=

𝛾𝛾 𝑑𝑑𝑥𝑥 − 𝛾𝛾 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜 𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡

−𝛾𝛾 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜𝑐𝑐2 𝑑𝑑𝑥𝑥 + 𝛾𝛾 𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡

𝑖𝑖′𝑥𝑥 ≡𝑑𝑑𝑥𝑥′

𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡′=

𝑖𝑖𝑥𝑥 − 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜1 − 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜 𝑖𝑖𝑥𝑥

𝑐𝑐2

Page 56: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Along y-axis

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 56

𝑑𝑑𝑦𝑦′ = 𝑑𝑑𝑦𝑦

𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡′= −𝛾𝛾 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜𝑐𝑐2

𝑑𝑑𝑥𝑥 + 𝛾𝛾 𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡

𝑑𝑑𝑦𝑦′

𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡′=

𝑑𝑑𝑦𝑦

−𝛾𝛾 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜𝑐𝑐2 𝑑𝑑𝑥𝑥 + 𝛾𝛾 𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡

𝑖𝑖′𝑦𝑦 ≡𝑑𝑑𝑦𝑦′

𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡′=

𝑖𝑖𝑦𝑦𝛾𝛾 1 − 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜 𝑖𝑖𝑥𝑥

𝑐𝑐2

Page 57: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Along z-axis

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 57

𝑑𝑑𝑧𝑧′ = 𝑑𝑑𝑧𝑧

𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡′= −𝛾𝛾 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜𝑐𝑐2

𝑑𝑑𝑥𝑥 + 𝛾𝛾 𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡

𝑑𝑑𝑧𝑧′

𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡′=

𝑑𝑑𝑧𝑧

−𝛾𝛾 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜𝑐𝑐2 𝑑𝑑𝑥𝑥 + 𝛾𝛾 𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡

𝑖𝑖′𝑧𝑧 ≡𝑑𝑑𝑧𝑧′

𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡′=

𝑖𝑖𝑧𝑧𝛾𝛾 1 − 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜 𝑖𝑖𝑥𝑥

𝑐𝑐2

Page 58: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

In Summary, Addition of Velocities:

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 58

𝑖𝑖′𝑦𝑦 =𝑖𝑖𝑦𝑦

𝛾𝛾 1 − 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜 𝑖𝑖𝑥𝑥𝑐𝑐2

𝑖𝑖′𝑧𝑧 =𝑖𝑖𝑧𝑧

𝛾𝛾 1 − 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜 𝑖𝑖𝑥𝑥𝑐𝑐2

𝑖𝑖′𝑥𝑥 =𝑖𝑖𝑥𝑥 − 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜

1 − 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜 𝑖𝑖𝑥𝑥𝑐𝑐2

Page 59: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Inverted Relations:

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 59

𝑖𝑖𝑦𝑦 =𝑖𝑖′𝑦𝑦

𝛾𝛾 1 + 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜 𝑖𝑖′𝑥𝑥𝑐𝑐2

𝑖𝑖𝑧𝑧 =𝑖𝑖′𝑧𝑧

𝛾𝛾 1 + 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜 𝑖𝑖′𝑥𝑥𝑐𝑐2

𝑖𝑖𝑥𝑥 =𝑖𝑖′𝑥𝑥 + 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜

1 + 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜 𝑖𝑖′𝑥𝑥𝑐𝑐2

Page 60: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Example

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 60

𝒗𝒗𝑜𝑜 = −0.600 𝑐𝑐

𝒖𝒖𝑥𝑥 = +0.990 𝑐𝑐

𝑖𝑖′𝑥𝑥 =𝑖𝑖𝑥𝑥 − 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜

1 − 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜 𝑖𝑖𝑥𝑥𝑐𝑐2

=0.990 𝑐𝑐 − −0.600 𝑐𝑐

1 − −0.600 𝑐𝑐 0.990 𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐2

= 0.997 𝑐𝑐

Page 61: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 61

2.7 Experimental Verification of Special Relativity

Page 62: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Cosmic Rays and Muon Decay

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 62

𝜏𝜏 = 1.52 𝜇𝜇𝑠𝑠

𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑜𝑜

= 𝑖𝑖−𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑖 2 𝑡𝑡

𝜏𝜏

Page 63: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 63

(Incorrect) Classical Calculation

𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑜𝑜

= 𝑖𝑖−𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑖 2 𝑡𝑡

𝜏𝜏

𝑡𝑡 =ℎ𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣 = 0.98 𝑐𝑐

ℎ = 2000 𝑚𝑚= 6.80 𝜇𝜇𝑠𝑠

= 𝑖𝑖−𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑖 2 6.80 𝜇𝜇𝑖𝑖

1.52 𝜇𝜇𝑖𝑖 = 4.5%

Don’t agree with experiment𝜏𝜏 = 1.52 𝜇𝜇𝑠𝑠

Page 64: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Relativistic Calculation

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 64

𝑣𝑣 = 0.98 𝑐𝑐 𝛾𝛾 =1

1 − 0.982≅ 5

𝑡𝑡′ =𝑡𝑡𝛾𝛾 =

6.80 𝜇𝜇𝑠𝑠5

≅ 1.36 𝜇𝜇𝑠𝑠

𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑜𝑜

= 𝑖𝑖−𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑖 2 𝑡𝑡′

𝜏𝜏 = 𝑖𝑖−𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑖 2 1.36 𝜇𝜇𝑖𝑖

1.52 𝜇𝜇𝑖𝑖 = 54%Agrees with experiment

Page 65: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Atomic Clock Measurement

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 65

Page 66: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Velocity Addition

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 66

𝑖𝑖′𝑥𝑥 = 𝑐𝑐 𝑣𝑣𝑥𝑥 = 𝑐𝑐

𝜋𝜋0 → 𝛾𝛾 + 𝛾𝛾

𝑖𝑖𝑥𝑥 =𝑖𝑖′𝑥𝑥 + 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜

1 + 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜 𝑖𝑖′𝑥𝑥𝑐𝑐2

𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜 = 0.99975 𝑐𝑐

Page 67: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

2.10 Relativistic Doppler effect for light waves in vacuum

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 67

Although light velocity in vacuum is always constant c, the frequency will change for a relative motion between source and observer

Higher Frequency Lower Frequency

Source-Observer

approaching

Source-Observer receding

Page 68: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Relativistic Doppler effect for light waves in vacuum

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 68

𝑓𝑓 =𝑐𝑐 𝑇𝑇 − 𝑣𝑣 𝑇𝑇

𝜆𝜆

=𝑐𝑐 𝑓𝑓

𝑐𝑐 𝑇𝑇 − 𝑣𝑣 𝑇𝑇

𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑡𝑡ℎ 𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓 𝑡𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑖 𝑤𝑤𝑓𝑓𝑣𝑣𝑖𝑖 𝑡𝑡𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓 = 𝑐𝑐 𝑇𝑇 − 𝑣𝑣 𝑇𝑇

𝑓𝑓 =𝑐𝑐𝜆𝜆

𝑣𝑣 𝑇𝑇𝑣𝑣𝑐𝑐 𝑇𝑇𝑐𝑐

Page 69: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 69

𝑓𝑓 =𝑝𝑝𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑝𝑝𝑖𝑖𝑓𝑓 𝑡𝑡𝑓𝑓𝑚𝑚𝑖𝑖 𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓 𝑡𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑖 𝑠𝑠𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑐𝑐𝑖𝑖𝑡𝑡𝑓𝑓𝑚𝑚𝑖𝑖 𝑝𝑝𝑖𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑑𝑑 𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓 𝑡𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑖 𝑠𝑠𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑐𝑐𝑖𝑖 =

𝑇𝑇′𝑜𝑜�1𝑓𝑓′𝑜𝑜

𝑇𝑇 = 𝛾𝛾 𝑇𝑇′𝑜𝑜 𝑓𝑓 =𝑇𝑇 𝑓𝑓′𝑜𝑜𝛾𝛾

𝑓𝑓 =𝑐𝑐 𝑓𝑓

𝑐𝑐 𝑇𝑇 − 𝑣𝑣 𝑇𝑇 =1 + 𝛽𝛽1 − 𝛽𝛽

𝑓𝑓′𝑜𝑜=𝑐𝑐

𝛾𝛾 𝑐𝑐 − 𝑣𝑣𝑓𝑓′𝑜𝑜

Page 70: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Relativistic Doppler effect for light propagating in vacuum

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 70

𝑓𝑓 =1 + 𝛽𝛽1 − 𝛽𝛽

𝑓𝑓′𝑜𝑜 𝑓𝑓 =1 − 𝛽𝛽1 + 𝛽𝛽

𝑓𝑓′𝑜𝑜

redshiftedblueshifted

Source-Observer

approaching

Source-Observer receding

Page 71: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Rotation of Venus

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 71

Page 72: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Laser Cooling

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 72

Page 73: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Laser Radar Technology

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 73

Page 74: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

2.11 Relativistic Linear Momentum

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 74

Page 75: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Classical Expressions from Galileo and Newton:

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 75

Newton’s law

𝑝𝑝 ≡ 𝑚𝑚 𝑖𝑖 �⃗�𝐹 =𝑑𝑑𝑝𝑝𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡

Linear Momentum

Newton’s law is invariant under Galilean transformations, but notunder Lorentz transformations.

Page 76: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Relativistic Linear Momentum

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 76

𝑝𝑝 = 𝛤𝛤 𝑚𝑚 𝑖𝑖

Invariance of Newton’s law under Lorentz transformations will be shown

to lead to:

𝛤𝛤 ≡1

1 − 𝑖𝑖𝑐𝑐

2

Page 77: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Conservation of Linear Momentum in an Elastic Collision:

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 77

𝑖𝑖′𝑥𝑥 = 0

𝑖𝑖′𝑦𝑦 = ∓𝑖𝑖𝑜𝑜

𝑖𝑖𝑥𝑥 = 0

𝑖𝑖𝑦𝑦 = ± 𝑖𝑖𝑜𝑜

𝑖𝑖𝑦𝑦 =𝑖𝑖′𝑦𝑦

𝛾𝛾 1 + 𝑣𝑣 𝑖𝑖′𝑥𝑥𝑐𝑐2

𝑖𝑖𝑥𝑥 =𝑖𝑖′𝑥𝑥 + 𝑣𝑣

1 + 𝑣𝑣 𝑖𝑖′𝑥𝑥𝑐𝑐2

𝑖𝑖𝑥𝑥 = 𝑣𝑣

𝑖𝑖𝑦𝑦 =∓ 𝑖𝑖𝑜𝑜𝛾𝛾

∆𝑖𝑖𝑥𝑥 = 0

∆𝑖𝑖𝑥𝑥 = 0

∆𝑖𝑖𝑦𝑦 = −2 𝑖𝑖𝑜𝑜

∆𝑖𝑖𝑦𝑦 =2 𝑖𝑖𝑜𝑜𝛾𝛾

∆𝑝𝑝 = 𝑚𝑚 ∆𝑖𝑖 + ∆𝑖𝑖𝑚𝑚

𝑚𝑚

𝑚𝑚 ≠ 0

Page 78: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Relativistic Linear Momentum

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 78

𝑖𝑖𝑥𝑥 = 𝑣𝑣

𝑖𝑖𝑦𝑦 =∓ 𝑖𝑖𝑜𝑜𝛾𝛾

𝛤𝛤 =1

1 −𝑣𝑣2 + 𝑖𝑖𝑜𝑜2

𝛾𝛾2𝑐𝑐2

𝑖𝑖𝑥𝑥 = 0

𝑖𝑖𝑦𝑦 = ± 𝑖𝑖𝑜𝑜

𝛤𝛤 ∆𝑖𝑖𝑥𝑥 = 0

𝛤𝛤 ∆𝑖𝑖𝑦𝑦 =−2 𝑖𝑖𝑜𝑜

1 − 𝑖𝑖𝑜𝑜2𝑐𝑐2

𝛤𝛤 =1

1 − 𝑖𝑖𝑜𝑜2𝑐𝑐2

𝛤𝛤 ∆𝑖𝑖𝑥𝑥 = 0

𝛤𝛤 ∆𝑖𝑖𝑦𝑦 = 𝛤𝛤2 𝑖𝑖𝑜𝑜𝛾𝛾

=2 𝑖𝑖𝑜𝑜

1 − 𝑖𝑖𝑜𝑜2𝑐𝑐2

𝑝𝑝 = 𝑚𝑚 𝛤𝛤 𝑖𝑖 𝛤𝛤 ≡1

1 − 𝑖𝑖𝑐𝑐

2∆𝑝𝑝 = 𝑚𝑚 𝛤𝛤 ∆𝑖𝑖 + ∆𝑖𝑖 = 0

Page 79: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Relativistic Linear Momentum

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 79

𝑝𝑝 = 𝑚𝑚 𝛤𝛤 𝑖𝑖

𝛤𝛤 ≡1

1 − 𝑖𝑖𝑐𝑐

2

Page 80: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

2.12 Relativistic Energy

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 80

�⃗�𝐹 =𝑑𝑑�⃗�𝑝𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡

𝑊𝑊12 = 𝐾𝐾2 − 𝐾𝐾1 = �1

2�⃗�𝐹 � 𝑑𝑑𝑓𝑓 = �

1

2 𝑑𝑑𝑝𝑝𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡

� 𝑑𝑑𝑓𝑓

Page 81: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 81

𝐾𝐾2 − 𝐾𝐾1 = �1

2𝑑𝑑𝑝𝑝𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡

� 𝑑𝑑𝑓𝑓

�⃗�𝑝 = 𝑚𝑚 𝛤𝛤 𝑖𝑖

= 𝑚𝑚�1

2𝑑𝑑 𝛤𝛤 𝑖𝑖𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡

� 𝑖𝑖 𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡

𝑑𝑑𝑓𝑓 = 𝑖𝑖 𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡

= 𝑚𝑚�1

2𝑖𝑖 𝑑𝑑 𝛤𝛤 𝑖𝑖

𝑑𝑑�⃗�𝑝 = 𝑚𝑚 𝑑𝑑 𝛤𝛤 𝑖𝑖

𝑖𝑖 =𝑑𝑑𝑓𝑓𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡

Page 82: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Solving the integral:

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 82

𝐾𝐾 = 𝑚𝑚�1

2𝑖𝑖 𝑑𝑑 𝛤𝛤 𝑖𝑖

𝛤𝛤 ≡1

1 − 𝑖𝑖𝑐𝑐

2

= 𝑚𝑚 𝑐𝑐2 1

1− 𝑢𝑢𝑐𝑐

2 − 1

= 𝑚𝑚�0

𝑢𝑢 𝑖𝑖

1 − 𝑖𝑖𝑐𝑐

2 �3 2𝑑𝑑𝑖𝑖

Page 83: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Kinetic Energy

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 83

𝐾𝐾 = 𝑚𝑚 𝑐𝑐21

1 − 𝑖𝑖𝑐𝑐

2− 1

𝐾𝐾 ≅𝑚𝑚 𝑖𝑖2

2

𝑖𝑖𝑐𝑐

2≪ 1

1

1 − 𝑖𝑖𝑐𝑐

2≅ 1 +

12𝑖𝑖𝑐𝑐

2

Page 84: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Comparison of Classical and Relativistic Kinetic Energy

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 84

Page 85: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Experimental Results

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 85

Page 86: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Total Relativistic Energy

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 86

𝐾𝐾 = 𝑚𝑚 𝑐𝑐21

1 − 𝑖𝑖𝑐𝑐

2− 1

𝐾𝐾 + 𝑚𝑚 𝑐𝑐2 =𝑚𝑚 𝑐𝑐2

1 − 𝑖𝑖𝑐𝑐

2𝐸𝐸𝑡𝑡𝑜𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑙𝑙 =

𝐸𝐸0 = 𝑚𝑚 𝑐𝑐2Rest Energy:

Total Energy: = 𝛤𝛤 𝑚𝑚 𝑐𝑐2

Page 87: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Hydrogen Fusion and Solar Energy

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 87

1𝐻𝐻 + 1𝐻𝐻 → 2𝐻𝐻 + 𝑖𝑖+ + 𝜈𝜈𝑖𝑖 + 0.42 MeV

2𝐻𝐻 + 1𝐻𝐻 → 3𝐻𝐻𝑖𝑖 + 𝛾𝛾 + 5.49 MeV

3𝐻𝐻𝑖𝑖 + 3𝐻𝐻𝑖𝑖 → 4𝐻𝐻𝑖𝑖 + 2 1𝐻𝐻 + 𝛾𝛾 + 12.86 MeV

Page 88: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Total Energy and Linear Momentum

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 88

𝑝𝑝 =𝑚𝑚 𝑖𝑖

1 − 𝑖𝑖𝑐𝑐

2

𝐸𝐸𝑡𝑡𝑜𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑙𝑙 =𝑚𝑚 𝑐𝑐2

1 − 𝑖𝑖𝑐𝑐

2

𝑝𝑝2 𝑐𝑐2 =𝑚𝑚2 𝑖𝑖2 𝑐𝑐2

1 − 𝑖𝑖𝑐𝑐

2

𝐸𝐸𝑡𝑡𝑜𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑙𝑙 2 =𝑚𝑚2 𝑐𝑐4

1 − 𝑖𝑖𝑐𝑐

2

𝐸𝐸𝑡𝑡𝑜𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑙𝑙 2 − 𝑝𝑝2 𝑐𝑐2 = 𝑚𝑚2 𝑐𝑐4

Page 89: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Massless Particles:

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 89

𝐸𝐸𝑡𝑡𝑜𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑙𝑙 2 − 𝑝𝑝2 𝑐𝑐2 = 𝑚𝑚2 𝑐𝑐4

𝐸𝐸𝑡𝑡𝑜𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑙𝑙 = 𝑝𝑝 𝑐𝑐

𝑖𝑖 = 𝑐𝑐

𝑚𝑚 = 0

Page 90: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Units of Energy:

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 90

𝑊𝑊 = 𝑞𝑞 ∆𝑉𝑉

𝑖𝑖 = 1.6022 × 10−19 𝐶𝐶

∆𝑉𝑉 = 1 𝑉𝑉

𝑊𝑊 = 𝑖𝑖 ∆𝑉𝑉 = 1.6022 × 10−19 𝐽𝐽 ≡ 1 𝑖𝑖𝑉𝑉

Page 91: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Units of Mass:

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 91

𝐸𝐸0 = 𝑚𝑚 𝑐𝑐2 𝑚𝑚 =𝐸𝐸0𝑐𝑐2

Particle Mass (MeV) / c2 Mass (u)electron 0.511 0.54858 × 10-3

proton 938.27 1.007276neutron 939.57 1.008665

Higgs boson 125,090 134.3

1 𝑖𝑖 ≡ 112𝑚𝑚𝑓𝑓𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓 𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑡𝑡𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑙𝑙 12𝐶𝐶

= 931.494 𝑀𝑀𝑖𝑖𝑉𝑉/𝑐𝑐2

= 1.66054 × 10−27 𝑘𝑘𝑓𝑓

1 𝑘𝑘𝑓𝑓 = 8.987 × 1016 𝐽𝐽/𝑐𝑐2

Page 92: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Units of Linear Momentum

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 92

𝐸𝐸𝑡𝑡𝑜𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑙𝑙 2 − 𝑝𝑝2 𝑐𝑐2 = 𝑚𝑚2 𝑐𝑐4

𝑙𝑙𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓 𝑚𝑚𝑓𝑓𝑚𝑚𝑖𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑡𝑡𝑖𝑖𝑚𝑚 =𝑖𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑦𝑦

𝑐𝑐

Page 93: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Binding Energy:

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 93

2 ×

2 ×

2 𝐸𝐸0, 𝑝𝑝 + 2 𝐸𝐸0, 𝑖𝑖 − 𝐸𝐸0, 𝐻𝐻𝑖𝑖 = 𝐸𝐸𝐵𝐵,𝐻𝐻𝑖𝑖

2 1.007276 𝑖𝑖 + 2 1.008665 𝑖𝑖 − 4.001505 u 𝑐𝑐2 = 0.0304 𝑖𝑖 𝑐𝑐2

= 𝐸𝐸𝐵𝐵,𝐻𝐻𝑖𝑖

= 28.3 𝑀𝑀𝑖𝑖𝑉𝑉

Page 94: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

2.9 Spacetime Representation

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 94

Page 95: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Conventional Representation: (𝑡𝑡, 𝑥𝑥)

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 95

Page 96: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Spacetime Representation (𝑥𝑥, 𝑐𝑐𝑡𝑡)

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 96

• When describing events in relativity, it is convenient to represent events on a spacetimediagram.

• In this diagram one spatial coordinate x, to specify position, is used and instead of time t, ct is used as the other coordinate so that both coordinates will have dimensions of length.

• Spacetime diagrams were first used by H. Minkowski in 1908 and are often called Minkowskidiagrams. Paths in Minkowski spacetime are called worldlines.

Page 97: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Worldline

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 97

Page 98: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 98

𝜃𝜃

𝑐𝑐 ∆𝑡𝑡

∆𝑥𝑥

tan 𝜃𝜃 =∆𝑥𝑥𝑐𝑐 ∆𝑡𝑡

=𝑖𝑖𝑐𝑐

= 𝛽𝛽

tan 𝜃𝜃 =𝑖𝑖𝑐𝑐

= 𝛽𝛽 ≤ 1𝑖𝑖

𝜃𝜃 ≤ 45°

Page 99: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Light Cone

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 99

Page 100: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Spacetime and Inertial Frames of Reference

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 100

𝑥𝑥

𝑥𝑥’

𝑐𝑐 𝑡𝑡’𝑐𝑐 𝑡𝑡

𝑥𝑥′ = 𝛾𝛾 𝑥𝑥 − 𝛾𝛾 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜 𝑡𝑡

𝑡𝑡′= −𝛾𝛾 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜𝑐𝑐2

𝑥𝑥 + 𝛾𝛾 𝑡𝑡

𝜃𝜃

𝜃𝜃

tan 𝜃𝜃 =𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜𝑐𝑐

Page 101: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Back to the Lorentz Transformations:

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 101

𝑑𝑑𝑥𝑥′ = 𝛾𝛾 𝑑𝑑𝑥𝑥 − 𝛾𝛾 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜 𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡

𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡′= −𝛾𝛾 𝑣𝑣𝑜𝑜𝑐𝑐2

𝑑𝑑𝑥𝑥 + 𝛾𝛾 𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡

𝑑𝑑𝑦𝑦′ = 𝑑𝑑𝑦𝑦

𝑑𝑑𝑧𝑧′ = 𝑑𝑑𝑧𝑧

𝑑𝑑𝑥𝑥 2 + 𝑑𝑑𝑦𝑦 2 + 𝑑𝑑𝑧𝑧 2 − 𝑐𝑐2 𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡 2 = 𝑑𝑑𝑥𝑥′ 2 + 𝑑𝑑𝑦𝑦′ 2 + 𝑑𝑑𝑧𝑧′ 2 − 𝑐𝑐2 𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡′ 2

Invariant: its value does not change among inertial frames of reference

𝑥𝑥𝑦𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑐𝑐𝑡𝑡

four-vector

Page 102: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Example 2.13

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 102

𝐾𝐾 = 2.00 𝐺𝐺𝑖𝑖𝑉𝑉 𝐾𝐾 = 2.00 𝐺𝐺𝑖𝑖𝑉𝑉

𝐸𝐸𝑡𝑡𝑜𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑙𝑙 = ? ?

= 𝐾𝐾 + 𝑚𝑚 𝑐𝑐2

= 2.00 𝐺𝐺𝑖𝑖𝑉𝑉 + 0.93827 GeV

= 2.94 𝐺𝐺𝑖𝑖𝑉𝑉

Page 103: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Example 2.13

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 103

𝐾𝐾 = 2.00 𝐺𝐺𝑖𝑖𝑉𝑉 𝐾𝐾 = 2.00 𝐺𝐺𝑖𝑖𝑉𝑉

𝑝𝑝 = ? ?

𝐸𝐸𝑡𝑡𝑜𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑙𝑙 2 − 𝑝𝑝2 𝑐𝑐2 = 𝑚𝑚2 𝑐𝑐4

𝑝𝑝 =1𝑐𝑐

𝐸𝐸𝑡𝑡𝑜𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑙𝑙 2 − 𝑚𝑚 𝑐𝑐2 2

=1𝑐𝑐

2.938 𝐺𝐺𝑖𝑖𝑉𝑉 2 − 0.93827𝐺𝐺𝑖𝑖𝑉𝑉 2

=2.78 𝐺𝐺𝑖𝑖𝑉𝑉

𝑐𝑐

Page 104: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Example 2.13

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 104

𝐾𝐾 = 2.00 𝐺𝐺𝑖𝑖𝑉𝑉 𝐾𝐾 = 2.00 𝐺𝐺𝑖𝑖𝑉𝑉

𝑖𝑖 = ? ? 𝛽𝛽 = ? ? 𝛤𝛤 = ? ?

𝐸𝐸𝑡𝑡𝑜𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑙𝑙 = 𝐾𝐾 + 𝑚𝑚 𝑐𝑐2 =𝑚𝑚 𝑐𝑐2

1 − 𝑖𝑖𝑐𝑐

2= 𝛤𝛤 𝑚𝑚 𝑐𝑐2

𝛤𝛤 =𝐸𝐸𝑡𝑡𝑜𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑙𝑙𝑚𝑚 𝑐𝑐2

=2.938 𝐺𝐺𝑖𝑖𝑉𝑉

0.93827 𝐺𝐺𝑖𝑖𝑉𝑉= 3.13

𝛽𝛽 =𝛤𝛤2 − 1𝛤𝛤2

= 0.948

Page 105: CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 300 fall 18... · 2020. 3. 17. · Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 2 • 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference • 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental

Topics

Fall 2018 Prof. Sergio B. Mendes 105

• 2.0 Inertial Frames of Reference• 2.1 Conceptual and Experimental Inconsistencies• 2.2 The Michelson-Morley Experiment• 2.3 Einstein’s Postulates• 2.4 The Lorentz Transformation• 2.5 Time Dilation and Length Contraction• 2.6 Addition of Velocities• 2.7 Experimental Verification• 2.8 Twin Paradox• 2.9 Space-Time• 2.10 Doppler Effect• 2.11 Relativistic Momentum• 2.12 Relativistic Energy• 2.13 Computations in Modern Physics• 2.14 Electromagnetism and Relativity