chapter 14. 2 judicial policymaking judges confront conflicting values in cases before them some...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Chapter 14
![Page 2: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
![Page 3: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases
before them
Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental policy decisions Decisions become precedent for similar
cases
Court decisions can, therefore, undo work of elected majorities
3
![Page 4: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
National Judicial Supremacy
Supreme Court--- only court defined by Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution Congress given power to create national
court system
Judiciary Act of 1789 created system of federal courts separate from state courts In early years of Republic, not particularly
powerful4
![Page 5: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Chief Justice John Marshall
5
![Page 6: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Judicial Review of the Other Branches
Constitution does not speak to question of “who should prevail?” in conflict between different branches of government
In Marbury v. Madison (1803), Supreme Court established power of judicial review Ruled that act of Congress authorizing
Supreme Court to issue orders against government officials unconstitutional
6
![Page 7: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Judicial Review of State Government
In 1796, Supreme Court ruled that a Virginia law canceling a debt to a British creditor violated U.S. Constitution's Supremacy Clause Virginia law therefore nullified
National supremacy requires Supreme Court to impose uniformity of national laws
7
![Page 8: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
The Exercise of Judicial Review
The components of judicial review: Federal courts can declare national,
state, and local laws unconstitutional
National laws or treaties supreme when conflict with state or local laws
Supreme Court final authority on meaning of Constitution
8
![Page 9: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
The Exercise of Judicial Review
Is judicial review undemocratic since federal judges appointed? Federalist No. 78 saw judicial review as
barrier to legislative oppression Constitutional amendments and
impeachment means to correct judicial errors
However, this power does mean judges can operate counter to majoritarian rule
9
![Page 10: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
The Organization of Courts
U.S. has complex court system
Individuals fall under jurisdiction of both national and state courts Litigants file nearly all (99%) of cases
in state courts Volume of state cases increases
about 1% a year, mostly contract disputes
10
![Page 11: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Figure 14.1
The Federal and State Court Systems, 2008-2009
11
![Page 12: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Some Court Fundamentals
The government prosecutes criminal cases, or violations of penal code
Some crimes common to all states, others specific to individual state or a few states Maintaining public order largely a state or
local function Federal criminal cases related to activities
that fall under powers of national government
Civil cases involve disputed claims to something of value
12
![Page 13: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Procedures and Policymaking
Most cases never go to trial Prosecutors may plea bargain Parties to a civil case may settle or one
may abandon efforts
Cases that go to court end in an adjudication Written reasons supporting a judicial
decision called opinions13
![Page 14: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Judicial Policymaking Judges make policy two ways:
Rulings where no legislation exists make common, or judge-made law
Judicial interpretations of legislative acts called statutory construction
With or without legislation, judges look to relevant opinions of higher courts to guide them
14
![Page 15: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
The Federal Court System
Organized in three tiers, as a pyramid Litigation starts with U.S. District Courts Appeals then go to the U.S. Courts of
Appeals Final tier is Supreme Court
Courts of Appeals and Supreme Court generally review only cases already decided in lower courts
15
![Page 16: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
The Federal Court System
16
![Page 17: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
The U.S. District Courts
Each state has at least one federal district court A total of 94 federal district courts Entry point for federal court system U.S. magistrate judges assist
district judges but lack independent judicial authority
17
![Page 18: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Sources of Litigation Federal criminal cases
Civil cases alleging a violation of national law
Civil cases brought against the U.S. government
Civil cases between citizens of different states if disputed amount exceeds $75,000
18
![Page 19: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
The U.S. Courts of Appeals
Twelve regional U.S. courts of appeals Thirteenth court, U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit, is not a regional court
Each appeals court hears cases from a geographical area, or circuit
All cases resolved in U.S. district court or decisions of federal administrative agencies can be appealed
19
![Page 20: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Geographic Boundaries of Federal District Courts and Circuit Courts of Appeals
20
![Page 21: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Appellate Court Proceedings
Rulings based on rulings made and procedures followed in trial courts If ruling incorrect or proper procedure
not followed, may order new trial
Most cases resolved by panel of 3 judges Judges review written briefs May or may not schedule oral
arguments 21
![Page 22: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Precedents and Making Decisions
Written judgment of appellate courts serve as precedent for subsequent cases
Judges make policy to extent they influence other courts
Stare decisis : Let the Decision Stand.. provides continuity and predictability to the law
Rulings designed to correct errors in district court proceedings and to interpret the law
22
![Page 23: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Uniformity of Law Appellate courts try to harmonize
decisions in region when district judges make conflicting rulings
However, courts of appeals not bound by decisions of other circuits
Supreme Court avenue for resolving conflicting decisions by different circuit courts of appeals
23
![Page 24: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
The Supreme Court Supreme Court strives to achieve a
just balance among the values of freedom, order, and equality
Flag burning as a form of political protest
School desegregation Race as a factor in university
admissions24
![Page 25: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
The Justices of the Supreme Court of the
United States
25
![Page 26: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
A Supreme Court of Its Own
The United Kingdom latest democracy to establish a supreme court
Prior to October, 2009, a committee from the House of Lords exercised judicial functions
New court independent of Parliament Signals an increasing federalization of
the United Kingdom
26
![Page 27: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
UK Supreme Court
27
![Page 28: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Access to the Court Idea that anyone can take a case to the
Supreme Court theory, not fact
Court’s cases come from two sources: Original jurisdiction established by Article III,
Section 2, of the Constitution Appellate jurisdiction from U. S. courts of
appeals or a state’s court of last resort
Cases from state courts must have exhausted appeals in their state system and deal with a federal question
28
![Page 29: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
The Supreme Court’s Docket
Supreme Court hears fewer than 100 cases from the more than 8,000 submitted each year Requests made by petition for certiorari Rule of four unwritten requirement Business cases substantial portion of
docket
Justices meet twice a week to vote on previously argued cases and consider new cases
29
![Page 30: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
The Solicitor General
Represents the national government before the Supreme Court Third-ranking position in Department of
Justice
Duties include determining whether to appeal a lower court’s decision, reviewing briefs for appeals, and deciding whether or not to file amicus curiae briefs in any appellate court
30
![Page 31: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
The Solicitor General Position has two roles:
Advocate for president’s policy preferences Defend the institutional interests of the
national government
Traditionally recommends only cases of general importance
Some call position “the tenth justice”
31
![Page 32: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Decision Making
Once review granted, attorneys submit written briefs --they are definitely not brief!
Oral arguments held two to three hours a day, five to six days per month from October through April
After arguments heard, justices hold conferences to discuss cases and vote These meetings limited to the nine justices
32
![Page 33: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Journey of a Lifetime
33
![Page 34: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Judicial Restraint and Judicial Activism
Concept of judicial restraint means decisions based on legal doctrines, prior decisions, and deference to elected officials
Judicial activists maintain judges should use powers to promote judges’ preferred social and political goals
Terms not limited to a particular ideology
34
![Page 35: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Figure 14-3
Measuring Judicial Activism
35
![Page 36: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Judgment and Argument
Voting outcome is called the judgment
Justices in the majority draft opinion setting out reasons for decision If all agree, decision is unanimous Justices who agree but for different
reasons than listed in the majority opinion may file a concurring opinion
Justices who disagree may file a dissenting opinion
36
![Page 37: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
The Opinion The chief justice or most senior justice in
the majority decides which justice will write majority opinion
Draft opinion circulated among all justices for criticisms and suggestions Justices may choose to change initial
vote during this time
Dissent happening more frequently in recent years
37
![Page 38: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Strategies on the Court
Cases that reach the Supreme Court require difficult choices
Ideologies reflect values; some justices have tried to encourage appointment of like-minded colleagues Liberals value freedom over order
and equality over freedom Conservatives choose order over
freedom and freedom over equality Intellectual ability also affects debates38
![Page 39: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
The Chief Justice Forms docket Directs Court’s conferences May also serve these roles:
Generating solidarity within the group
Intellectual leadership Policy leadership
39
![Page 40: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Judicial Recruitment No formal requirements for
appointments to federal courts President nominates; Senate must
confirm Congress sets compensation:
40
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
$223,500
Associate Supreme Court justices
$213,900
Courts of Appeals justices $184,500
District judges $174,000
Magistrate-judges $160,080
![Page 41: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
State Judicial Selection
Governor appoints judges in more than half of the states Some must then face retention
elections
Partisan election Nonpartisan election Legislative election In some states, must be confirmed in
legislature41
![Page 42: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
The Appointment of Federal Judges
Appointments for life
Presidents look for judges who favor their policies
Office of White House Counsel helps identify candidates Justice Department assists with screening
42
![Page 43: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
The “Advice and Consent”
of the Senate For district and appeals court, senator
from president’s party must approve Senatorial courtesy Or state’s House delegation, if no
senator from president’s party
Recent presidents have tried to appoint more women and minorities
43
![Page 44: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Senate Confirmation Senate Judiciary Committee conducts
hearings for each judicial nominee
Confirmations have become ideological battleground Hearings focus on judicial policy and
approach towards interpretations of the law
Filibusters sometimes used to prevent appointments
44
![Page 45: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
The American Bar Association
By custom, ABA screens judicial candidates Well qualified Qualified Not qualified
George W. Bush did not use, believing group too liberal
President Obama restored use
45
![Page 46: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Recent Presidents and the Federal Judiciary
While recent presidents have appointed more diverse judiciary, ideology rules
Carter’s appointments most liberal
Reagan and George W. Bush-appointed judges most conservative
Ideological appointments easier when president’s party controls Senate
46
![Page 47: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Appointment to the Supreme Court
Attract extreme public scrutiny
Since 1900, six appointments have failed to be confirmed by Senate Most important factor: partisan politics
Most nominees have prior judicial experience
“Lame duck” presidents frequently unsuccessful
47
![Page 48: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Justice Elena Kagan Joining
the Supreme Court
48
![Page 49: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Ideological Shifts President George W. Bush nominated two
Supreme Court justices, John Roberts and Samuel Alito
As a result, ideology of court more conservative
Justice Kennedy now “swing vote”
President Obama nominated Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan
49
![Page 50: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Figure 14-4
A More Representative Court
50
![Page 51: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
The Consequences of Judicial Decisions
Judicial rulings small percentage of legal dispositions
Most cases end in plea bargain or no court judgment About 10 percent of civil and
criminal cases go to trial Many cases appealed to delay
day of reckoning
51
![Page 52: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Supreme Court Rulings:Implementation and Impact
Others must implement Supreme Court decisions
Ambiguous opinions affect implementation Desegregation and school prayer
Roe v. Wade generated (and continues to generate) heated response from public
52
![Page 53: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Public Opinion and the Supreme Court
Even though not elected, ideologically balanced Court and public sentiment eventually align in most cases One exception: school prayer
Poll in 2009 showed six in 10 Americans more likely to approve than disapprove of job Supreme Court doing
53
![Page 54: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
The Courts and Models of Democracy
Majoritarian model: courts should follow the letter of the law and defer changes to elected representatives
Pluralist model: courts are policymaking branch of government and have legitimate right to consciously advance group interests Class action suits State court rulings based on either
federal law, state law, or both 54
![Page 55: Chapter 14. 2 Judicial Policymaking Judges confront conflicting values in cases before them Some courts, such as the Supreme Court, make fundamental](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649cf95503460f949ca2b2/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
The Right to Die Supreme Court rulings in Washington
v. Glucksberg and Vacco v. Quill that U.S. Constitution does not protect a right to assisted suicide States allowed to make own laws
Silence in Terry Schiavo case let stand lower court’s ruling
Other industrial democracies have decriminalized right to die
55