chapter 13c: random signals and noisebazuinb/ece3800/b_notes13c.pdf · 2020. 11. 18. · random...
TRANSCRIPT
Notes and figures are based on or taken from materials in the course textbook: Charles Boncelet, Probability, Statistics, and
Random Signals, Oxford University Press, February 2016.
B.J. Bazuin, Fall 2020 1 of 25 ECE 3800
Charles Boncelet, “Probability, Statistics, and Random Signals," Oxford University Press, 2016. ISBN: 978-0-19-020051-0
Chapter 13c: RANDOM SIGNALS AND NOISE
Sections 13.1 Introduction to Random Signals 13.2 A Simple Random Process 13.3 Fourier Transforms 13.4 WSS Random Processes 13.5 WSS Signals and Linear Filters 13.6 Noise
13.6.1 Probabilistic Properties of Noise 13.6.2 Spectral Properties of Noise
13.7 Example: Amplitude Modulation 13.8 Example: Discrete Time Wiener Filter 13.9 The Sampling Theorem for WSS Random Processes
13.9.1 Discussion 13.9.2 Example: Figure 13.4 13.9.3 Proof of the Random Sampling Theorem
Summary Problems
Notes and figures are based on or taken from materials in the course textbook: Charles Boncelet, Probability, Statistics, and
Random Signals, Oxford University Press, February 2016.
B.J. Bazuin, Fall 2020 2 of 25 ECE 3800
Signal plus noise processing
System analysis with a noise input …
tx
tn
th ty tr
Where the signal of interest is x(t), n(t) is a noise or interfering process. The signal plus noise is r(t) and the received system output is y(t) which has been filtered.
We have tntxtr
Assuming WSS with x and n independent and n zero mean
tntxtntxEtrtrERRR
tntntxtntntxtxtxERRR
NNXXRR RtxtnEtntxERR
NNNXXXRR RRR 2
For 0 mean noise …
NNXXRR RRR
And then
* hhRRR NNXXYY
hhRhhRR NNXXYY
Design considerations
the filter should not “modify” the signal of interest (unity gain, no phase)
the filter should remove as much noise as possible.
Notes and figures are based on or taken from materials in the course textbook: Charles Boncelet, Probability, Statistics, and
Random Signals, Oxford University Press, February 2016.
B.J. Bazuin, Fall 2020 3 of 25 ECE 3800
Signal‐to‐Noise‐(Power)‐RatioSNR(alwaysdoneforpowers)
The signal-to-noise ratio is the power ratio of the signal power to the noise power.
The input SNR is defined as
0
02
2
NN
XX
Noise
Signal
R
R
tNE
tXE
P
P
The output SNR is defined as
0
02
2
hhR
hhR
thtNE
thtXE
P
P
NN
XX
Noise
Signal
For a white noise process and assuming the “filter” does not change the input signal (unity gain), but strictly reduces the noise power by the equivalent noise bandwidth of the filter.
We have
dhN
dwwHwSR XXYY202
22
10
With appropriate filtering with unity gain where the signal exists and bandwidth reduction for the noise
𝑅 01
2𝜋∙ 𝑆 𝑤 ∙ |𝐻 𝑤 | 𝑁 ∙ 𝐵
or 𝑅 0 𝑅 0 𝑁 ∙ 𝐵
We expect the output SNR is defined as
EQ
XX
Noise
Signal
BN
R
P
P
0
0
The narrower the filter applied prior to signal processing, the greater the SNR of the signal! Therefore, always apply an analog filter prior to processing the signal of interest!
From the definition of band-limited noise power, the equation for the equivalent noise bandwidth (performed as a previous example)
12
10
12
12
20 dh
NdhRthtNE NN
dffHdtthBEQ
22
2
1
2
1
Under the unity gain condition
dtth1
Notes and figures are based on or taken from materials in the course textbook: Charles Boncelet, Probability, Statistics, and
Random Signals, Oxford University Press, February 2016.
B.J. Bazuin, Fall 2020 4 of 25 ECE 3800
Otherwise, the equivalent noise bandwidth can be defined as
dffHfH
BEQ
2
2max
12
For a real, low pass filter this simplifies to
dffHH
BEQ
2
20
12
Using Parseval’s Theorem this can be also defined as
dffHdwwHdtth222
2
1
2
2
2
2
02
dtth
dtth
H
dtth
BEQ
Notes and figures are based on or taken from materials in the course textbook: Charles Boncelet, Probability, Statistics, and
Random Signals, Oxford University Press, February 2016.
B.J. Bazuin, Fall 2020 5 of 25 ECE 3800
Example Section 13.7 Amplitude Modulation.
𝑋 𝑡 𝐴 ∙ 1 𝛽 ∙ 𝑚 𝑡 ∙ 𝑐𝑜𝑠 2𝜋 ∙ 𝑓 ∙ 𝑡 𝜃 Where m(t) is a random message, typically WSS, zero mean and bounded by +/-1. A is a an amplitude, f is the center frequency and there is a random phase angle (uniform distribution around a circle). The R.V. are independent.
𝐸 𝑋 𝑡 𝐸 𝐴 ∙ 1 𝛽 ∙ 𝑚 𝑡 ∙ 𝑐𝑜𝑠 2𝜋 ∙ 𝑓 ∙ 𝑡 𝜃
𝐸 𝑋 𝑡 𝐴 ∙ 𝐸 1 𝛽 ∙ 𝑚 𝑡 ∙ 𝐸 𝑐𝑜𝑠 2𝜋 ∙ 𝑓 ∙ 𝑡 𝜃
𝐸 𝑋 𝑡 𝐴 ∙ 1 0 ∙ 0 0
Autocorrelation
𝐸 𝑋 𝑡 ∙ 𝑋 𝑡 𝜏 𝑅 𝑡, 𝑡 𝜏
𝑅 𝑡, 𝑡 𝜏 𝐸 𝐴 ∙ 1 𝛽 ∙ 𝑚 𝑡 ∙ 𝑐𝑜𝑠 2𝜋 ∙ 𝑓 ∙ 𝑡 𝜃
∙ 𝐴 ∙ 1 𝛽 ∙ 𝑚 𝑡 𝜏 ∙ 𝑐𝑜𝑠 2𝜋 ∙ 𝑓 ∙ 𝑡 𝜏 𝜃
𝐸 𝑋 𝑡 ∙ 𝑋 𝑡 𝜏 𝐴 ∙ 𝐸1 𝛽 ∙ 𝑚 𝑡 𝛽 ∙ 𝑚 𝑡 𝜏 𝛽 ∙ 𝑚 𝑡 ∙ 𝑚 𝑡 𝜏∙ 𝑐𝑜𝑠 2𝜋 ∙ 𝑓 ∙ 𝑡 𝜃 ∙ 𝑐𝑜𝑠 2𝜋 ∙ 𝑓 ∙ 𝑡 𝜏 𝜃
𝑅 𝑡, 𝑡 𝜏 𝐴 ∙ 1 𝛽 ∙ 𝑅 𝜏 ∙12∙ 𝑐𝑜𝑠 2𝜋 ∙ 𝑓 ∙ 𝜏
𝑅 𝜏𝐴2∙ 𝑐𝑜𝑠 2𝜋 ∙ 𝑓 ∙ 𝜏
𝐴2∙ 𝛽 ∙ 𝑅 𝜏 ∙ 𝑐𝑜𝑠 2𝜋 ∙ 𝑓 ∙ 𝜏
Forming the PSD
𝑆 𝑤𝐴4∙ 𝛿 𝑤 2𝜋 ∙ 𝑓 𝛿 𝑤 2𝜋 ∙ 𝑓
𝐴4∙ 𝛽 ∙ 𝑆 𝑤 ∗ 𝛿 𝑤 2𝜋 ∙ 𝑓 𝛿 𝑤 2𝜋 ∙ 𝑓
Which after performing the convolution becomes
𝑆 𝑤𝐴4∙ 𝛿 𝑤 2𝜋 ∙ 𝑓 𝛿 𝑤 2𝜋 ∙ 𝑓
𝐴4∙ 𝛽 ∙ 𝑆 𝑤 2𝜋 ∙ 𝑓 𝑆 𝑤 2𝜋 ∙ 𝑓
Your textbook simplifies the problem a bit … dealing with only the message and not the additional carrier component.
Notes and figures are based on or taken from materials in the course textbook: Charles Boncelet, Probability, Statistics, and
Random Signals, Oxford University Press, February 2016.
B.J. Bazuin, Fall 2020 6 of 25 ECE 3800
ExamplesofLinearSystemFrequency‐DomainAnalysis
Noise in a linear feedback system loop.
sX sY
1
1 ssA
sN
Linear superposition of X to Y and N to Y.
sNsYsXss
AsY
1
sNsXss
A
ss
AsY
11
1
sNsXss
A
ss
AsssY
11
2
sNAss
sssX
Ass
AsY
2
2
2
There are effectively two filters, one applied to X and a second apply to N.
Ass
AsH X
2 and
Ass
sssH N
2
2
sNsHsXsHsY NX
Generic definition of output Power Spectral Density:
wSwHwSwHwS NNNXXXYY 22
Notes and figures are based on or taken from materials in the course textbook: Charles Boncelet, Probability, Statistics, and
Random Signals, Oxford University Press, February 2016.
B.J. Bazuin, Fall 2020 7 of 25 ECE 3800
Change in the input to output signal to noise ratio.
dwwS
dwwS
SNR
NN
XX
In
dwwHN
wSH
dwwSwH
dwwSwH
SNR
N
XXX
NNN
XXX
Out20
2
2
2
2
0
EQ
XX
X
N
XX
Out BN
wS
dwH
wHN
wS
SNR
0
2
2
0
02
Where for this special case … (HN not a low pass or band pass filter … bad example)
dwH
wHB
X
NEQ 2
2
0
If the noise is added at the x signal input, the expected definition of noise equivalent bandwidth results.
Notes and figures are based on or taken from materials in the course textbook: Charles Boncelet, Probability, Statistics, and
Random Signals, Oxford University Press, February 2016.
B.J. Bazuin, Fall 2020 8 of 25 ECE 3800
Systems that Maximize Signal-to-Noise Ratio – Advanced Concept
SNR is defined as
EQNoise
Signal
BN
tsE
P
P
0
2
Define for an input signal tnts
Define for a filtered output signal tnts oo
For a linear system, we have:
0
dtntshtnts oo
The input SNR can be describe as
2
2
tnE
tsE
P
PSNR
Noise
Signalin
The output SNR can be described as
EQo
o
o
o
Noise
Signalout BN
tsE
tnE
tsE
P
PSNR
2
2
2
0
2
2
0
2
1dtthN
dtshE
SNR
o
out
Using Schwartz’s Inequality the numerator becomes
0
2
0
2
2
0
dtsEdhEdtshE
Notes and figures are based on or taken from materials in the course textbook: Charles Boncelet, Probability, Statistics, and
Random Signals, Oxford University Press, February 2016.
B.J. Bazuin, Fall 2020 9 of 25 ECE 3800
Applying this inequality, an SNR inequality can be defined as
0
2
0
2
0
2
2
1dtthN
dtsEdh
SNR
o
out
Canceling the filter terms, we have
0
22 dtsEN
SNRo
out
To achieve the maximum SNR, the equality condition of Schwartz’s Inequality must hold, or
0
2
0
2
2
0
dtsdhdtsh
This condition can be met for utsKh
where K is an arbitrary gain constant.
The desired impulse response is simply the time inverse of the signal waveform at time t, a fixed moment chosen for optimality. If this is done, the maximum filter power (with K=1) can be computed as
tdsdtsdht
2
0
2
0
2
tN
SNRo
out 2
max
This filter concept is called a matched filter. – Advanced Concept
If you wanted to detect a burst waveform that has been transmitted, to maximize the received SNR in white noise, the receiving filter should be the time inverse of the signal transmitted!
Note and caution: when using such a filter, the received signal maximum SNR will occur when the signal and convolved filter perfectly overlap. This moment in time occurs when the “complete” burst has been received by the system. If measuring the time-of-flight of the burst, the moment is exactly the filter length longer than the time-of-flight. (Think about where the leading edge of the signal-of-interest is when transmitted, when first received, and when fully present in the filter).
Notes and figures are based on or taken from materials in the course textbook: Charles Boncelet, Probability, Statistics, and
Random Signals, Oxford University Press, February 2016.
B.J. Bazuin, Fall 2020 10 of 25 ECE 3800
TheMatchedFilter–AdvancedConcept
Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matched_filter
“In signal processing, a matched filter is obtained by correlating a known signal, or template, with an unknown signal to detect the presence of the template in the unknown signal.[1][2] This is equivalent to convolving the unknown signal with a conjugated time-reversed version of the template. The matched filter is the optimal linear filter for maximizing the signal to noise ratio (SNR) in the presence of additive stochastic noise. Matched filters are commonly used in radar, in which a known signal is sent out, and the reflected signal is examined for common elements of the out-going signal. Pulse compression is an example of matched filtering. It is so called because impulse response is matched to input pulse signals. Two-dimensional matched filters are commonly used in image processing, e.g., to improve SNR for X-ray. Matched filtering is a demodulation technique with LTI (linear time invariant) filters to maximize SNR.[3].”
Applications:
Radar Sonar Pulse Compression Digital Communications (Correlation detectors) GPS pseudo-random sequence correlation
If you are looking for a signal, maximize the output of the filter when the signal is input! You will have a matched filter!
See ChirpCorrelationReceiver.m
Notes and figures are based on or taken from materials in the course textbook: Charles Boncelet, Probability, Statistics, and
Random Signals, Oxford University Press, February 2016.
B.J. Bazuin, Fall 2020 11 of 25 ECE 3800
Cooper & McGillem 9-6 Another optimal solution: Systems that Minimize the Mean-Square Error between the desired output and actual output – Advanced Concept
The error function tYtXtErr
where
0
dtNtXhtY
Performed in the Laplace Domain
sFsFsHsFsFsFsF NXXYXE
sFsHsHsFsFsFsF NXYXE 1
Computing the error power
j
j
NNXX dssHsHsSsHsHsSj
ErrE 112
12
j
j XXXXXX
NNXX dssSsHsSsHsS
sHsHsSsS
jErrE
2
12
Defining the input PSD sSsSsFsF NNXXCC
j
j
CC
NNXX
C
XXC
C
XXC
ds
sFsF
sSsS
sF
sSsHsF
sF
sSsHsF
jErrE
2
12
We can not do much about the last term, but we can minimize the terms containing H(s). Therefore, we focus on making the following happen
0
sF
sSsHsF
C
XXC
Step 1:Note that for this filter 1s- F
1
s F
1
CC sSsS NNXX
This is called a whitening filter as it forces the signal plus noise PSD to unity (white noise).
Step 2: Letting sF
sHsHsHsHC
221
Notes and figures are based on or taken from materials in the course textbook: Charles Boncelet, Probability, Statistics, and
Random Signals, Oxford University Press, February 2016.
B.J. Bazuin, Fall 2020 12 of 25 ECE 3800
Minimizing the terms containing H2(s), now we must focus on
sF
sSsH
C
XX
2 and
sF
sSsH
C
XX2
Letting H2 be defined for the appropriate Left or Right half-plane poles
Let LHPC
XX
sF
sSsH
2 and RHPC
XX
sF
sSsH
2
The composite filter is then
LHPC
XX
C sF
sS
sFsHsHsH
1
21
This solution is often called a Wiener Filter and is widely applied when the signal and noise statistics are known a-priori!
Notes and figures are based on or taken from materials in the course textbook: Charles Boncelet, Probability, Statistics, and
Random Signals, Oxford University Press, February 2016.
B.J. Bazuin, Fall 2020 13 of 25 ECE 3800
13.8 Example: Discrete Time Wiener Filter – Advanced Concept
Your textbook works to derive a discrete form of the Wiener Filter.
In it, you must calculate the coefficients of a Finite-Impulse-Response (FIR) digital filter.
Notes and figures are based on or taken from materials in the course textbook: Charles Boncelet, Probability, Statistics, and
Random Signals, Oxford University Press, February 2016.
B.J. Bazuin, Fall 2020 14 of 25 ECE 3800
Cooper & McGillem - Eigenvalue Based Filters – Advanced Concept We can continue a derivation started in the previous class discussion about time-sample filters, matrices and eigenvalues (derived based on having a class in Linear Algebra & Matrix Theory).
kxkwky
knkskx The expected value
HH kxkwkxkwEkykyE
HXXH kwkRkwkykyE
For a WSS input
HXXH kwRkwkykyE
If the signal and noise are zero mean, this becomes
HNNSSH kwRRkwkykyE
How do we maximize the output SNR
HNN
HSS
Noise
Signal
kwRkw
kwRkw
P
P
If we assume that the noise is white, IR NNN 2
H
HSS
NH
HSS
NNoise
Signal
kwkw
kwRkw
kwIkw
kwRkw
P
P
22
11
Performing a cholesky factorization of the signal autocorrelation matrix generates the following. Here, the numerator should suggest that an eigenvalue computation could provide a degree of simplification.
H
HHSS
NNoise
Signal
kwkw
kwRRkw
P
P
2
1
Once formed, the eigenvalue equation to solve is kwRkw S
which result in solutions for the resulting eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the form
2
2
2
1
NH
H
NNoise
Signal
kwkw
kwkw
P
P
Selecting the maximum eigenvalue and it’s eigenvector for the weight that maximizes the SNR!
2
2max
NNoise
Signal
P
P
Notes and figures are based on or taken from materials in the course textbook: Charles Boncelet, Probability, Statistics, and
Random Signals, Oxford University Press, February 2016.
B.J. Bazuin, Fall 2020 15 of 25 ECE 3800
13.9 The sampling Theorem for WSS Random Processes – Advanced Concept
If you take ECE 4550, you will be dealing with the sampling theorem.
It involves discrete time sampling of a continuous signal and the conditions under which the continuous signal can be regenerated from the discrete time samples.
Notes and figures are based on or taken from materials in the course textbook: Charles Boncelet, Probability, Statistics, and
Random Signals, Oxford University Press, February 2016.
B.J. Bazuin, Fall 2020 16 of 25 ECE 3800
Advanced Topic Adaptive Filter – Advanced Concept
If a desired signal reference is available, we may wish to adapt a system to minimize the difference between the desired signal or signal characteristics and a filter input signal.
The following information is based on:
S. Haykin, Adaptive Filter Theory, 5th ed., Prentice-Hall, 2014.
There are four classes of Adaptive Filter Applications
Identification
Inverse Modeling
Prediction
Interference Cancellation
Identification
The mathematical Model of an “unknown plant”
In state space control system this is an adaptive observer of the Plant
Examples: Seismology predicting earth strata
Notes and figures are based on or taken from materials in the course textbook: Charles Boncelet, Probability, Statistics, and
Random Signals, Oxford University Press, February 2016.
B.J. Bazuin, Fall 2020 17 of 25 ECE 3800
InverseModeling
Providing an “Inverse Model” of the plant
For a transmission medium, the inverse model corrects non-ideal transmission characteristics.
An adaptive equalizer
Prediction
Based on past values, provide the best prediction possible of the present values.
Positioning/Navigation systems often need to predict where an object will be based on past observations
Notes and figures are based on or taken from materials in the course textbook: Charles Boncelet, Probability, Statistics, and
Random Signals, Oxford University Press, February 2016.
B.J. Bazuin, Fall 2020 18 of 25 ECE 3800
InterferenceCancellationExample
Cancellation of unknown interference that is present along with a desired signal of interest. Two sensors of signal + interference and just interference Reference signal (interference) is used to cancel the interference in the Primary signal
(noise + interference) Classic Examples: Fetal heart tone monitors, spatial beamforming, noise cancelling
headphones.
From: S. Haykin, Adaptive Filter Theory, 5th ed., Prentice-Hall, 2014
The “Reference signal” contains the unwanted interference. The goal of the adaptive filter is to match the reference signal with the “interference” in the “Primary signal and force the output “difference error” to be minimized in power. Since “interference” is the only thing available to work with, the “power minimum” solution would be one where the interference is completely removed!
These techniques are based on the Weiner filter solution. While the signal and interference statistics are not known a-priori (before the filter gets started), after a number of input samples they can be estimated and used to form the filter coefficients. Then, as time continues, there is a sense that the estimates should improve until the adaptive coefficients are equal to those that would be computed with a-priori information.
The advantage ... adaptive filter can work when the statistics are slowly time varying!
Note: An application using an LMS adaptive filter is not too difficult for a senior project! (e.g. noise cancelling headphones, remove 60 cycle hum, etc.)
Notes and figures are based on or taken from materials in the course textbook: Charles Boncelet, Probability, Statistics, and
Random Signals, Oxford University Press, February 2016.
B.J. Bazuin, Fall 2020 19 of 25 ECE 3800
Textbook:Cancellinganinterferingwaveform–AdvancedConcept
The example in your textbook p. 407-411.
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1-20
-10
0
10
20or
igin
al
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1-10
-5
0
5
10
15
Filt
ered
Time (sec)
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6Adaptive Weights in Time
Tim
e (s
ec)
Weights
a1
a2
a3
a4
Notes and figures are based on or taken from materials in the course textbook: Charles Boncelet, Probability, Statistics, and
Random Signals, Oxford University Press, February 2016.
B.J. Bazuin, Fall 2020 20 of 25 ECE 3800
Matlab % % Text Adaptive Filter Example % clear close all t=0:1/200:1; % Interfereing Signal - 60 Hz n=10*sin(2*pi*60*t+(pi/4)*ones(size(t))); % Signal of interest and S + I x1=1.1*(sin(2*pi*11*t)); x2=x1+n; % Reference signal to excise r=cos(2*pi*60*t); m=0.15; a=zeros(1,4); z=zeros(1,201); z(1:4)=x2(1:4); w(1,:)=a'; w(2,:)=a'; w(3,:)=a'; w(4,:)=a'; % Adaptive weight computation and application for k=4:200 a(1)=a(1)+2*m*z(k)*r(k); a(2)=a(2)+2*m*z(k)*r(k-1); a(3)=a(3)+2*m*z(k)*r(k-2); a(4)=a(4)+2*m*z(k)*r(k-3); z(k+1)=x2(k+1)-a(1)*r(k+1)-a(2)*r(k)-a(3)*r(k-1)-a(4)*r(k-2); w(k+1,:)=a'; end figure(1) subplot(2,1,1); plot(t,x2,'k') ylabel('original') subplot(2,1,2) plot(t,z,'k');grid; ylabel('Filtered'); xlabel('Time (sec)'); figure(2) plot(t,w);grid; title('Adaptive Weights in Time') ylabel('Time (sec)') xlabel('Weights') legend('a1','a2','a3','a4');
Notes and figures are based on or taken from materials in the course textbook: Charles Boncelet, Probability, Statistics, and
Random Signals, Oxford University Press, February 2016.
B.J. Bazuin, Fall 2020 21 of 25 ECE 3800
Review Skills 7 and Skills 8 from the solution web site. Exam based questions! Hopefully you have looked at them and potentially tried a few.
Highlights from Skills 8 include the following
36.1 Suppose the circuit shown below has input ttx 9sin6 , where is a random
variable uniformly distributed on [0,2pi]. Assuming the R=1 M and C=1uF,
a. If the output signal is y(t), find the transfer function of the circuit. (H(s) possible given)
sX
sCR
RsY
1
sCR
sCRsH
1 and
s
ssH
1
111 2
2
s
s
s
s
s
ssHsH
b. Find the spectral density Syy(w) of the output and simplify. (Need AC. of Rxx and PSD Sxx)
99sin69sin6 ttERXX
99sin9sin36 ttERXX
2918cos9cos2
36 tERXX
9cos18 XXR
dtjwttwS XX exp9cos18
dtjwttjtjwS XX exp9exp9exp9
999 wwwS XX
Now the PSD of the output can be computer
1
9992
2
w
wwwwSYY
Notes and figures are based on or taken from materials in the course textbook: Charles Boncelet, Probability, Statistics, and
Random Signals, Oxford University Press, February 2016.
B.J. Bazuin, Fall 2020 22 of 25 ECE 3800
9982
81999
19
99
2
2
wwwwwSYY
c. Sketch the spectral density Syy(w).
Syy(w) is almost identical to Sxx(w). The filter used is a high-pass filter with a relative cutoff frequency w0 of 1.
d. What would happen if the input term had a “DC” component? What would the filter output for signals at w=0 be?
36.5 Consider the following linear circuit, where x(t) is the input voltage signal and y(t) is the output voltage signal.
x(t)
C
y(t)
LR
a. Find the transfer function of this system. For R=25 ohms, L=5H and C=0.05F (Note: these are not realistic values!)
sXsLsCR
sCsY
1
1
05.052505.01
1
1
122
ssLCssCR
sH
41
4
125.01
1
25.025.11
12
ssssss
sH
161
16
41
4
41
422
ssssss
sHsH
b. Assume the input signal is 21 5cos42cos312 tttx , where 1 and 2 are independent random variables that are uniform on the interval [0,2pi]. From this compute (1) the autocorrelation of the input signal and (2) the power spectral density of the input signal.
21
21
55cos422cos312
5cos42cos312
tt
ttERXX
Notes and figures are based on or taken from materials in the course textbook: Charles Boncelet, Probability, Statistics, and
Random Signals, Oxford University Press, February 2016.
B.J. Bazuin, Fall 2020 23 of 25 ECE 3800
22
122
21
111
21
55cos5cos16
22cos5cos125cos48
55cos2cos12
22cos2cos92cos36
55cos4822cos36144
tt
ttt
tt
ttt
tt
ERXX
2
2121
1212
1
2510cos2
165cos
2
16
27cos2
1223cos
2
12
58cos2
1253cos
2
12
224cos2
92cos
2
9144
t
tt
tt
t
ERXX
5cos82cos2
9144 XXR
dtjwtwS XX exp5cos82cos
2
9144
558222
9288 wwwwwwS XX
c. Compute (1) the autocorrelation of the output signal and (2) the spectral density of the output signal. Simplify all answers.
Output Power Spectrum sHsHsSsS XXYY
161
1622
ww
wSwS XXYY
161
16
558222
9288
22
ww
wwwwwwSYY
161
16558
161
1622
2
9
161
16288
22
22
22
wwww
wwww
www
wSYY
Notes and figures are based on or taken from materials in the course textbook: Charles Boncelet, Probability, Statistics, and
Random Signals, Oxford University Press, February 2016.
B.J. Bazuin, Fall 2020 24 of 25 ECE 3800
16515
16558
16212
1622
2
9
16010
16288
22
22
22
ww
ww
w
wSYY
55533
64
22100
72
288
551066
168
22100
16
2
9
288
ww
ww
w
ww
ww
w
wSYY
dwjwwSR YYYY
exp2
1
dwjw
ww
wwwRYY
exp
55533
64
22100
72288
2
1
5cos533
642cos
100
72144 YYR
d. Compute the ratio of the output to input total average power of the signals.
5cos82cos2
9144
5cos533
642cos
100
72144
0
0
XX
YY
in
out
R
R
P
P
9255.0
5.156
84.144
82
9144
533
64
100
72144
0
0
XX
YY
in
out
R
R
P
P
e. Compute the ratio of the output to input dc average power of the two signals. 1
144
144
XX
YY
in
out
R
R
P
P
f. From the above, comment on the filtering effect of the original LCR circuit. Is it a low pass, band pass, or high pass filter?
Notes and figures are based on or taken from materials in the course textbook: Charles Boncelet, Probability, Statistics, and
Random Signals, Oxford University Press, February 2016.
B.J. Bazuin, Fall 2020 25 of 25 ECE 3800
This is a low-pass filter where dc is passed from the input to the output. For the selected input signal, with oscillation at w=2 and w=5, the filter first rolls off at w=1 and then continues at w=4.
The input to output power for w=3 is 16.025
4
9
72
100
2
2
9100
72
in
out
P
P
The input to output power for w=5 is 015.0533
8
8533
64
in
out
P
P