cern mbhsm0101 and plan for future models f. savary on behalf of the 11t dipole project team

19
CERN-FNAL Video Meeting #13 Progress of the 11T Dipole short model program (Task 2 of HL-LHC WP-11) CERN MBHSM0101 and Plan for Future Models F. Savary on behalf of the 11T Dipole Project Team

Upload: basil

Post on 08-Feb-2016

48 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

CERN-FNAL Video Meeting #13 Progress of the 11T Dipole short model program (Task 2 of HL-LHC WP-11). CERN MBHSM0101 and Plan for Future Models F. Savary on behalf of the 11T Dipole Project Team. Part I: Practice Model MBHSM0101. Main design features. Single aperture, 6-bloc design - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CERN  MBHSM0101 and Plan for Future Models F. Savary on behalf of the 11T Dipole Project Team

CERN-FNAL Video Meeting #13

Progress of the 11T Dipole short model program (Task 2 of HL-LHC WP-11)

CERN MBHSM0101and

Plan for Future ModelsF. Savary on behalf of the 11T Dipole Project Team

Page 2: CERN  MBHSM0101 and Plan for Future Models F. Savary on behalf of the 11T Dipole Project Team

Click here to add footer 2

Part I:Practice Model MBHSM0101

Page 3: CERN  MBHSM0101 and Plan for Future Models F. Savary on behalf of the 11T Dipole Project Team

Click here to add footer 3

Main design features• Single aperture, 6-bloc design• 56 turns

• 22 on IL (4 blocs)• 34 on OL (2 blocs)

• Aperture: 60 mm• Coil length: 1.8 m• Yoke OD: 510 mm• Shell thickness: 12 mm [AISI 304L]• One SC coil, ID105

Page 4: CERN  MBHSM0101 and Plan for Future Models F. Savary on behalf of the 11T Dipole Project Team

Click here to add footer 4

Specific features• Copper coil #101

• End spacers CERN v0, longer coil• Sc coil #105

• Cable OST RRP 108/127• ODS alloy wedges (Oxide Dispersion Strengthening )• CERN V4 end spacers SLS (Selective Laser Sintering)

with springy legs - hinge• Metallic saddles and splice blocks• External trace, glued on coil OD, carrying V-taps and quench heaters

• Collars and yoke laminations produced by EDM (Electrical Discharge Machining)• Collars YUS130S Nippon Steel 3 mm thickness (LHC dipole)• Yoke laminations Arcelor Magnetil Low C steel 5.8 mm thickness

(LHC dipole)

Page 5: CERN  MBHSM0101 and Plan for Future Models F. Savary on behalf of the 11T Dipole Project Team

Click here to add footer 5

Assembly conditions - Winding• Winding tension:

• Coil #101: 300 N; insulation defects: >1• Coil #105: 250 N; insulation defects: 0

• Cable insulation• Coils #101 and #105:

• Outer sleeve: AGY S-2 Glass 11 Tex, direct braiding• Inner dielectric: Cogebi Firox 80 µm Mica – Fiber glass tape

• Winding monitoring during coil #105 production

D. SmekensJ. Mazet

Coils longer than expected: ~20 mm

Page 6: CERN  MBHSM0101 and Plan for Future Models F. Savary on behalf of the 11T Dipole Project Team

Click here to add footer 6

Binder curing• Binder CTD 1202-X; qty:

• Coil #101 IL: in excess; OL: in excess;• Coil #105 IL: 100 g; OL: 100 g;

• Shimming: nominal (shimming such that in the press the mid-plane of the cured coil is like in the magnet; 0.12 mm above center axis)• This is different compared to FERMILAB where oversized shimming

is used to compact the coil mid-plane beyond its nominal position in order to obtain a smaller coil size before entering into reaction

• With a load of 0.8 MN, the mold is nearly closed (< 0.1mm)• Then, a load of 2 MN is used for IL, and 4.2 MN for the OL

(complete pole)• The stress in the coils may not exceed 37 MPa at that stage

D. SmekensJ. Mazet

Page 7: CERN  MBHSM0101 and Plan for Future Models F. Savary on behalf of the 11T Dipole Project Team

Click here to add footer 7

Reaction treatment• Cavity of the reaction fixture is radially bigger than the curing

mold by 0.1 mm; and of similar dimension at coil mid-plane• Thus, if the curing press can be closed before reaching 37

MPa, the coil cannot be subjected to higher stress when closing the fixture. However, the dry fiber glass, and the tight tolerances induce large friction; also, a possible dimensional problem with the sealing foils could have generated interference between the sealing foil and the baseplate, preventing correct closure of the fixture

• The tightening torque to close the fixture was of the order of 300 Nm (FNAL applies 110 Nm to 160 Nm)

• Not clear: no coil contraction after reaction, actually less that 1 mm, when 4.5 mm were expected

D. SmekensN. BourceyF. Lackner

Page 8: CERN  MBHSM0101 and Plan for Future Models F. Savary on behalf of the 11T Dipole Project Team

Click here to add footer 8

Reaction treatment – Coil 105

Adjustment of dwell time to compensate the delay between the

temperature and tooling temperature

The homogeneity of T during ramp up was not very good, ±

9°C.However, it is OK during

dwell time

N. BourceyF. Lackner

Page 9: CERN  MBHSM0101 and Plan for Future Models F. Savary on behalf of the 11T Dipole Project Team

Click here to add footer 9

Impregnation• Resin: CTD 101K

• Anhydride cured epoxy system with excellent performance at cryogenic temperature, and radiation resistance

• The resin is preheated, and the coil is impregnated at 60°C

• Curing @ 110°C for 5 hours• Post curing heating @ 125°C for 16 hours

R. GauthierD. Smekens

Temperature [°C] Pot life [h] Viscosity [mm·Pa/s]25 145 1300

40 60 400

60 20 100

Page 10: CERN  MBHSM0101 and Plan for Future Models F. Savary on behalf of the 11T Dipole Project Team

Click here to add footer 10

Coils size

• Both coils, 101 and 105, were oversized, only in the mid-plane

• Best-fit on the outer diameter and the loading plates (interface with pole)

Page 11: CERN  MBHSM0101 and Plan for Future Models F. Savary on behalf of the 11T Dipole Project Team

Click here to add footer 11

Excess in mid-plane

-150 -50 50 20

030

040

050

060

070

080

090

090

011

0012

0013

0014

000

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

leftrightaverage

Coil length [mm]

Inte

rfer

ence

[µm

]

Page 12: CERN  MBHSM0101 and Plan for Future Models F. Savary on behalf of the 11T Dipole Project Team

Click here to add footer 12

Collaring steps

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 320

50100150200250300350400

Distance to collaring position right lead endright return endleft lead endleft return end

F [MN]

offs

et k

ey g

roov

e [µ

m]

With 8MN the mechanical stops of the collaring tool were in contact

Page 13: CERN  MBHSM0101 and Plan for Future Models F. Savary on behalf of the 11T Dipole Project Team

Click here to add footer 13

Shimming plan• Mid-plane is 650 µm beyond expectations. To compensate:

• One layer of Kapton was removed on the mid-plane

• Changed one layer of insulation to 0.05 µm thickness (in lieu of 0.125 µm)

Page 14: CERN  MBHSM0101 and Plan for Future Models F. Savary on behalf of the 11T Dipole Project Team

Click here to add footer 14

Yoking / welding of the shellsF. Lackner

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 80

100200300400500600700800

0

110

206

361426

526610

686Pressure rising, April 28th 2014

Pressure rising step

Tota

l cha

rge

in to

ns

3154906157901240166520652225

00.20.40.60.8

SIDE B 0110206361426526610686

Length in [mm]

Yoke

gap

[mm

]

Tota

l loa

d in

tons

Max. charge: 500 t/m on central section to close the welding gap

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

SIDE A0110206361426526610686

Length in [mm]

Yoke

gap

[mm

]

Tota

l loa

d in

tons

Page 15: CERN  MBHSM0101 and Plan for Future Models F. Savary on behalf of the 11T Dipole Project Team

Click here to add footer 15

FEA Results

  Collar-nose Stress (MPa)

Coil MinStress (MPa)

Coil Max Stress (MPa)

Avg Shell Stress (MPa)

Collaring Load 135 -7 -94  

Post-Collaring 111 -8 -73  

Collar in yoke 111 -10 -70  

Max Force in Welding Press 118 -19 -63 9

Shell Weld + Press Force 124 -18 -64 187

Shell Welded, no Press Force 122 -17 -63 194

Cool Down (4.3K) 79 -6 -77 377

Cool Down (1.9K) 79 -6 -77 379

12 T 24 6 -130 381

Page 16: CERN  MBHSM0101 and Plan for Future Models F. Savary on behalf of the 11T Dipole Project Team

Click here to add footer 16

Bullet gauges loadingM. GuinchardP. Grosclaude

8 to 9 kN per bullet

Page 17: CERN  MBHSM0101 and Plan for Future Models F. Savary on behalf of the 11T Dipole Project Team

Click here to add footer 17

Page 18: CERN  MBHSM0101 and Plan for Future Models F. Savary on behalf of the 11T Dipole Project Team

Click here to add footer 18

Part II:Plan for Future Models

Page 19: CERN  MBHSM0101 and Plan for Future Models F. Savary on behalf of the 11T Dipole Project Team

Click here to add footer 19

Designation Type Strand type Coil ID Status Next steps / Remark

MBHSM0101 1 coil Cu – 108/127 101 - 105 Done Analysis

MBHSP0101 1-in-1 108/127 - 108/127 106 – 107 Collaring done 10

days ago

Shell welding in early Sept., andcold tests as from middle of Sept.

MBHSP0102 1-in-1 132/169 - 132/169 108 – 109 Winding of 1st coil

done

Finish assembly by end 2014, and do testing in Jan. 15

MBHSP0103 1-in-1 PIT114 111 – 112 To be done, one cable unit length available Testing in April/May 15

MBHDP0101 2-in-1 108/127 - 132/169 106/107 – 108/109

To be done as soon as testing of MBHSP0102 is finished

No new coil

MBHDP0102 2-in-1 108/127 – PIT114 106/107 – 111/112

To be done as soon as testing of MBHSP0103 is finished

No new coil

MBHSP0104 1-in-1 132/169 - 132/169 114 – 115

To be done as soon as MBHSP0103 is finished

MBHDP0103 2-in-1 132/169 - 132/169 108/109 – 114/115

To be done as soon as testing of MBHSP0104 is finished

No new coil