ccb-arb combination is better than mono-therapypresentation seminar 2-cmosmch

45
Welcome

Upload: rajat1974

Post on 19-Jul-2015

111 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

Welcome

Page 2: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch
Page 3: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

ARB- CCB combination in HTN: uncontrolled with monotherapy

Dr Rajat SR Biswas, MD

Resident Physician

Page 4: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

Objectives: To see whether combination is better than monotherapy

Rationale: Pharmacological synergism we get if antihypertensive works on different mechanism

• Types of study: Randomozed Multicenter, single/double blind, parallel group

•Site: Europe, USA and Africa

Page 5: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

Patients and methods- >18 to 70 years patients of both sexes with stage ll hypertension or MSSBP>140- <200 or SSDBP >90- <120 mmHg

-Sitting or standing BP at non dominant arm by standard method with ideal BP monitor in accordance with British Hypertension society guideline

-ICH-GCP compliant and Declaration of Helsinki

Page 6: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

-Exclusion criteria- more or less same in all studies-Washout period-Initial drug administration then force titration then observation

-Intension to treat basis analysis-Last observation carried forward(POCF)-Common data analysis option(ANOCOVA, t- test or logistic regression)

Page 7: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch
Page 8: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

The Ex-Effects Study: Study Design

Page 9: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

The Ex-Effects Study: Patient Disposition

Page 10: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

The Ex-Effects Study: Results

Mean change from baseline in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) according to treatment at weeks 4 and 8 for (A) intent-to-treat population and (B) patients with a baseline mean sitting SBP 180 mm Hg. *P<.05 vs. amlodipine 5 to 10 mg. Standard error of the mean shown in brackets.

Page 11: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

The Ex-Effects Study: Results

(A) Mean change from baseline in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) at Week 4 according to subgroup. *P<.05 vs. amlodipine 5 to 10 mg. Standard error of the mean shown in brackets. (B) Proportion of patients achieving mean sitting SBP<140 mm Hg at Week 4 according to subgroup. Bars represent the 95% confidence intervals. Elderly patients are aged ≥65 years. BMI, body mass index; ISH, isolated systolic hypertension (SBP ≥140 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg2); N is the number of patients in the intention-to-treat population

Page 12: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

The Ex-Effects Study: Adverse Events

Page 13: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

The Ex-Effects Study: Conclusion

Amlodipine/valsartan 10/160 mg was found to be more effective than amlodipine 10 mg in stage 2 hypertension.

Page 14: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch
Page 15: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

Study Design

Page 16: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

Study Results: (A) Distribution of treatment response at week 3

Page 17: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

Study Results: (B) Distribution of treatment response at study end

Page 18: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

Study Results

Blood pressure reduction by category in patients receiving

amlodipine/valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide

(Aml/Val/HCTZ) triple therapy.

Page 19: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

Conclusion

Aml 10 mg/Val 320 mg/HCTZ 25 mg triple therapy is highly effective in reducing BP compared with dual components early in therapy.

Page 20: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch
Page 21: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

Study Design

Page 22: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

Study result

Between-Treatment Comparisons for Change From Baseline to End Point in Mean Sitting BP (Intent-to-Treat Population)

Page 23: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

Study Results: Mean sitting DBP (A) and SBP (B) by treatment and week

Page 24: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

Study Results: Between-treatment comparisons for change from baseline to end point in mean sitting BP (mm Hg) by baseline MSSBP. Data presented are least-square mean changes

Page 25: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

Adverse Events:AEs (>2% in Triple-Therapy Group), Regardless of Study-Drug Relationship

Page 26: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the efficacy/safety of treating moderate and severe hypertension with Aml/Val/HCTZ 10/320/25 mg.

Page 27: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

EX-FAST Study

Page 28: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

EX-FAST Study: Patient Disposition

Page 29: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

EX-FAST Study: Results

Incremental antihypertensive effects following a direct switch to amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg and 10/160 mg in patients with hypertension previously uncontrolled with monotherapy.

Page 30: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

EX-FAST Study: Results

The impact of prior antihypertensive monotherapy in patients switched directly to amlodipine/valsartan on mean change in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) from baseline to week 8 (A) and mean change from baseline in MSSBP over time with amlodipine/valsartan 10/160 mg according to previous antihypertensive monotherapy (B). *BP control is defined as BP <140/90 mm Hg for nondiabetic patients and BP <130/80 mm Hg for diabetic patients.

Page 31: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

EX-FAST Study: Results

Incremental antihypertensive effects following a direct switch to amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg and 10/160 mg in patients with hypertension previously uncontrolled with monotherapy.

Page 32: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

EX-FAST Study: Results

Proportion of diabetic and non-diabetic patients in whom a blood pressure (BP) goal of <140/90 mm Hg was reached with amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 and 10/160 mg at week 8 and week 16 (error bars show 95% confidence intervals).

Page 33: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

EX-FAST Study: Adverse Events

Page 34: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

EX-FAST Study: Conclusion

Amlodipine/valsartan was found to be an effective and well-tolerated strategy for BP control in a wide range of patients with hypertension not previously controlled by use of a single antihypertensive agent.

Page 35: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

The EX-STAND Study

Page 36: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

The EX-STAND Study: Study Design

Page 37: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

The EX-STAND Study: Study Results

Change in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) (mmHg) from baseline to week 8 (last observation carried forward) by treatment strategy in black patients with stage 2 hypertension (intent-to-treat population).

Page 38: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

The EX-STAND Study: Study Results

Change in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) (mmHg) from baseline by week and treatment strategy (intent-to-treat population) in black patients with stage 2 hypertension.

Page 39: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

The EX-STAND Study: Study Results

Change in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) (mmHg) from baseline to week 8 by treatment strategy and selected subgroups in black patients with stage 2 hypertension BMI¼body mass index; CI¼confidence interval; ISH¼isolated systolic hypertension. N is the number of intent-to-treat patients of the respective subgroup

Page 40: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

The EX-STAND Study: Study Results

Change in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) (mmHg) from baseline to week 12 in black patients with severe hypertension (baseline MSSBP X180mmHg) by treatment strategy. ANCOVA model with treatment, country, and length of washout as factors and baseline MSSBP as covariate.

Page 41: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

The EX-STAND Study: Study Results

Change in mean sitting pulse pressure (mmHg) from baseline to week 8 by treatment strategy and age category in black patients with stage 2 hypertension (intent-to-treat population).CI, confidence interval.

Page 42: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

The EX-STAND Study: Adverse Events

Page 43: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

The EX-STAND Study: Conclusion

Black patients with stage 2 hypertension, combination therapy with amlodipine/valsartan lowered BP more effectively than amlodipine alone with a favorable safety profile comparable to amlodipine monotherapy.

Page 44: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

Home message!!!

Page 45: CCB-ARB combination is better than mono-therapyPresentation  seminar 2-cmosmch

THANK YOU