case study macro disinvestment trouble

1
8/13/2019 Case Study Macro Disinvestment Trouble http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/case-study-macro-disinvestment-trouble 1/1 D isinvestment of government- owned shares in public sector undertakings (PSUs), cur- rently a topic of intense discussion within the finance ministry, is not a new idea. It was mooted as early as 1991, when Yashwant Sinha’s vote- on-account budget in March out- lined the importance of the govern- ment divesting its equity stake in PSUs. Later that year, Manmohan Singh, as finance minister, gingerly began work on disinvestment of gov- ernment shares in selected PSUs. The National Democratic Alliance government from 1998 to 2004 gave disinvestment a different push by going for privatisation of a few PSUs by selling the government’s majori- ty stake in them in favour of private players. Disinvestment slowed down considerably in the first term of the United Progressive Alliance (thanks to the political pressure the Left par- ties succeeded in exerting on the Congress, their alliance partner), but picked up in the UPA’s second term when there was no such pressure from the Left. The total proceeds from disin- vestment in the last 22 years are esti- mated at ~1.38 lakh crore. As many as 50 PSUs are listed on the stock exchanges, accounting for about 15 per cent of total market capitalisa- tion of all listed companies. This number does not include the PSUs that were privatised, such as VSNL, Balco, Maruti Udyog, Hindustan Zinc, CMC, IPCL and a handful of hotel properties owned by India Tourism Development Corporation. It is important to note that out of the total disinvestment revenue of ~1.38 lakh crore, privatisation of these undertakings gave the gov- ernment less than five per cent, or only about ~6,300 crore. Every financial year invariably begins with the setting of a target of revenue that the government hopes to garner through disinvestment. But the target has been missed in all y 1 0 g m c s y w p m m t t i S r e i t The trouble with disinvestme What should have primarily served as an instrument for improving PSU ma the years become a mere financial exercise to raise revenue to reduce the RAISINA HILL A K BHATTACHARYA

Upload: rajan2778

Post on 04-Jun-2018

232 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Case Study Macro Disinvestment Trouble

8/13/2019 Case Study Macro Disinvestment Trouble

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/case-study-macro-disinvestment-trouble 1/1

Disinvestment of government-owned shares in public sectorundertakings (PSUs), cur-

rently a topic of intense discussionwithin the finance ministry, is not anew idea. It was mooted as early as1991, when Yashwant Sinha’s vote-on-account budget in March out-lined the importance of the govern-ment divesting its equity stake inPSUs. Later that year, Manmohan

Singh, as finance minister, gingerlybegan work on disinvestment of gov-ernment shares in selected PSUs.The National Democratic Alliancegovernment from 1998 to 2004 gavedisinvestment a different push bygoing for privatisation of a few PSUsby selling the government’s majori-

ty stake in them in favour of privateplayers. Disinvestment slowed downconsiderably in the first term of theUnited Progressive Alliance (thanksto the political pressure the Left par-ties succeeded in exerting on theCongress, their alliance partner), butpicked up in the UPA’s second termwhen there was no such pressurefrom the Left.

The total proceeds from disin-vestment in the last 22 years are esti-mated at ~1.38 lakh crore. As many

as 50 PSUs are listed on the stockexchanges, accounting for about 15per cent of total market capitalisa-tion of all listed companies. Thisnumber does not include the PSUsthat were privatised, such as VSNL,Balco, Maruti Udyog, HindustanZinc, CMC, IPCL and a handful of 

hotel properties owned by IndiaTourism Development Corporation.It is important to note that out of the total disinvestment revenue of ~1.38 lakh crore, privatisation of these undertakings gave the gov-ernment less than five per cent, oronly about ~6,300 crore.

Every financial year invariablybegins with the setting of a target of revenue that the government hopesto garner through disinvestment.But the target has been missed in all

y10gmcsy

wpmm

ttiSreit

The trouble with disinvestmeWhat should have primarily served as an instrument for improving PSU mathe years become a mere financial exercise to raise revenue to reduce the

RAISINA HILL

A K BHATTACHARYA