case study-ford s rubber plantation
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/13/2019 Case Study-Ford s Rubber Plantation
1/15
D.C.Singhal Page 1 of 15
Fords Project of Rubber Plantation
Abstract
The rubber plantations of Fordlandia and Belterra were two attempts by the
Ford Motor Company from 1928-1945 to establish a permanent rubber
plantation in Brail! The "oal was two-fold #i$ to supply Ford%s internal
demand for rubber and #ii$ to pro&ide a better way of life for the Brailians
who li&ed and wor'ed on the plantations! The pro(e)t was mar'ed with
failures su)h as not understandin" nati&e )ulture and tryin" to impose a
*earborn-li'e wor' s)hedule and life style on the nati&e Brailians as well
as an inability to pre&ent predator atta)' on plantations parti)ularly leaf
bli"ht!
Introduction
Rubber has been a strategic material. It has many uses particularly for
vehicle tyres. Prior to World War 2, the only source of rubber was natural
rubber. Subsequently, synthetic rubber was developed and began to be
produced commercially. In 2005 about 21 million tons of rubber was
produced, of which approximately 42% was natural.
Natural Rubber
The rubber tree Hevea Brasiliensis is native of Brazil where it grows
naturally. It is mainly found within 10 N&S of the Equator. South America
was the main source of the limited amounts of rubber used during much of
the 19th century. In the latter half of the 19th century through to the second
decade of the20th century natural rubber supported one of the mostimportant development boomsin Brazil. The acquisition of rubber was lie
the !old "ush in the #$%. Thousands of immigrants flowed in to tap the
late& and turn it into rubber. The euphoria lasted through to 1910' when
-
8/13/2019 Case Study-Ford s Rubber Plantation
2/15
-
8/13/2019 Case Study-Ford s Rubber Plantation
3/15
D.C.Singhal Page 3 of 15
sulfurand other additives and then applying heat and pressure. This
improved its resistance and elasticity and prevented it from perishing. It
gave rubber great versatility and utility. (However, to recycle vulcanized
rubber, suitable process to devulcanize needs to be developed)
Project Decision
In the early 20th century, a cartel of Dutch and English rubber barons had a
stranglehold on the vast majority of the world's supply of rubber from the far
east plantations. By the late 1920s, Henry Ford set out to break this rubber
monopoly. His hundreds of thousands of new cars needed millions of tires,
which were very expensive to produce when buying raw materials from the
established rubber lords. He established a project in the Amazon rain forest
in Brazil to create the largest rubber plantation in the world.
Ford had a vision to lay a perfect American town in his Brazilian plantation.
He also wanted to transplant a Dearborn type lifestyle and work culture to
the plantation town. This social engineering was much resented by the
local workers.
If all went well, Ford would have both: a direct pipeline of coveted rubber to
Detroit and a utopia full of healthy, productive workers. But this enormously
ambitious project was ultimately a great failure as described in succeeding
sections.
Project Location
Henry Ford was influenced by a 1923 United States government survey
that named the Amazon as an ideal location for producing rubber. Ford had
also been contacted by Brazilian officials as early as 1923 with a view to
bring the rubber industry back to Brazil. After preliminary investigations,
-
8/13/2019 Case Study-Ford s Rubber Plantation
4/15
D.C.Singhal Page 4 of 15
Ford started his venture in Brazil in 1927 by founding a company named
Companhia Ford Industrial do Brazil in Belem, the capital of the state of
Para in Brazil.
In the project, corruption also seemed to have played a role. The interests
of local businessmen and even the governor of Para were often carried out
personally, not without any influence on the decision. This led to the
unexpected costs for bribes. Further, the cooperation of Ford with
Brazilian authorities was all but easy. Customs officers often refused to
actually enforce the tax concessions granted because Ford resisted to pay
bribes, though there was also confusion over federal versus regional
competences.
Brazil seemed the ideal choice considering that the rubber trees were
native to the region, and the rubber harvest could be shipped to the tire
factories in the US not only by sea but by land as well. In July 1927 Ford
was granted 10,000 square kilometer tract of land along the Tapajoz River.
The region had good soil for cultivation and rainfall was adequate. A
problem seen was the scarcity of labour which could be addressed by
constructing housing and other facilities for the workers (and attractivepay). The project was to produce enough rubber to make tires for
2,000,000 automobiles a year. In 1925 Ford Model-T accounted for 37% of
all the cars running in the planet.Also,Brazil hoped that by this project
Ford could bring the rubber industry back to Brazil.
Due to his intense dislike for experts [and accountants], Ford never
consulted any expert on rubber cultivation. He just sent a bunch of supplies
and managers into the jungle hoping to grow rubber. He could have saveda lot of money if he just hired a consultant to tell him that the land wasn't
very fertile and wasn't suitable for rubber plantation. But the main problem
was the South American leaf blight and insects that existed in the location
-
8/13/2019 Case Study-Ford s Rubber Plantation
5/15
D.C.Singhal Page 5 of 15
and attacked the trees when packed close together in a commercial
plantation.
Due to his dislike for experts, and his philosophy of training on the job,Ford appointed Einar Oxholm (the captain of the ship carrying the original
equipment but a man without any experience on plantation) as the first
manager of the plantation. The results were disastrous. The plantation
changed hands several times before Archibald Johnston took over in 1931.
In 1933 for the first time a rubber planting expert, James weir, was hired.
Project Implementation
Ford had negotiated with the Brazilian government into granting him 10,000
square kilometers of land in the Amazon rainforest along the Tapajos River
(a major tributary of Amazon River)in exchange for a nine-percent cut of
the plantation's profits. He immediately began to develop the area to
establish a town which was named Fordlndia. A steamer arrived with
earth-moving equipment, a pile driver, tractors, stump pullers, a locomotive,
ice-making machines, and prefabricated buildings. Workers began erecting
a rubber processing plant as the surrounding area was razed of vegetation.
The lumber from trees cut was hauled to the saw mill. Though initially it
was calculated that that tropical lumber will bear a part of the cost, there
was no market for lumber from Fordlndia due to high costs.
Many Ford employees were relocated to the site, and over the first few
months an American community sprung up from what was once a jungle
wilderness. It included a power plant, a modern hospital, a library, a golf
course, a hotel, and rows of white clapboard houses with wicker patio
furniture (patio = outdoor space adjoining a house usually paved). As the
town's population grew, all types of businesses followed, including tailors,
shops, bakeries, butcher shops, restaurants, and shoemakers. It grew into
-
8/13/2019 Case Study-Ford s Rubber Plantation
6/15
D.C.Singhal Page 6 of 15
a thriving community with Model T Fords frequenting the neatly paved
streets.
Beyond of the residential area, long rows of freshly-planted saplingssoondotted the landscape. Ford chose not to employ any botanistsin the
development of Fordlndia's rubber tree fields, instead he relied on the
company engineers. The engineers planted about two hundred trees per
acre despite the fact that there were only about seven wild rubber trees per
acre in the Amazon jungle. The plantations of East Asia were packedwith
flourishing trees, so it seemed reasonable to assume that the trees' native
land would be just as accommodating.
Cultural Clash
(ordl*ndia attracted a large numbers of worers. +ocal laborers were
offered a wage of thirty,seven cents a day to wor on the fields' which was
about double the normal rate for that line of wor. But (ord-s effort to
transplant %merica,, what he called the healthy lifestyle,, was not limited
to %merican buildings' but also included mandatory %merican lifestyle and
values. The plantation-s cafeterias were self,serve' which was not the local
custom' and they provided only %merican food such as hamburgers.
/orers had to live in %merican,style houses' and they were each
assigned a number which they had to wear on a badge. Brazilian laborers
were also required to attend %merican festivitieson weeends' such as
poetry readings' square,dancing' and )nglish,language sing,alongs. %
arring cultural difference was enry (ord-s prohibition. %lcoholwas strictly
forbidden inside (ordl*ndia' even within the worers- homes' on pain ofimmediate termination. rohibition was not the law in Brazil.
/orers- discontent grew as the unproductive months passed. Brazilian
worers,, accustomed to woring before sunriseand after sunset to avoid
the heatof the day,, were forced to wor proper %merican nine,to,five
-
8/13/2019 Case Study-Ford s Rubber Plantation
7/15
D.C.Singhal Page 7 of 15
shiftsunder the hot %mazon sun' using (ord-s assembly,line philosophies.
%nd malariabecame a serious problem due to the hilly terrain-s tendency to
pool water' providing the perfect breeding ground for mosquitoes.
3n 4ecember of 1950' after about a year of woring in a harsh environment
with a strict and disagreeable healthy lifestyle' the laborers- agitation
became critical in the worers- cafeteria. aving suffered too many
episodes of indigestion and degradation' a Brazilian man stood and
shouted that he would no longer tolerate the conditions. % chorus of voices
oined his' and the discord was soon oined by sounds of banging cups and
shattering dishes.%merican managers fled swiftlyto their homes or into the
woods' some of them chased by machete,wielding worers. % group of
managers scrambled to the docs and boarded the boats there' which they
moved to the center of the river and out of reach of the escalating riots.
6machete 7 nife or a&e8
The Brazilian military arrived three days later' and by that time the rioters
had e&pended most of their anger. /indows were broen and trucs were
overturned' but (ordl*ndia survived. /or resumed shortly. But the rubber
situation had not improved.
The Plantation
/hile the community struggled along month,to,month with its disgruntled
worforce' it was also faced with a maor dilemma. The tiny saplings
weren-t growingat all. eavy %mazon rains in the hilly terrain hemorrhaged
its topsoil' leaving infertile' rocy soil behind. Those trees which were able
to survive into adolescence were soon stricen with a leaf blightthat ate
away the leaves and left the trees stunted and useless. (ord-s managers
battled the fungus heroically' but they were not armed with the necessary
nowledgeof horticulture' and their efforts proved futile.
-
8/13/2019 Case Study-Ford s Rubber Plantation
8/15
D.C.Singhal Page 8 of 15
3n 1955' after three years with no appreciable progress to show for the
investment' enry (ord finally hired a plant pathologist' 4r. ames /eir'to
assess the situation. The /eir tried to coa& some fertile rubber trees from
the pitiful soil' but he was ultimately forced to conclude that the land wassimply unequal to the tas. The damp' hilly terrain was terrible for the trees'
but e&cellent for the blight.
Shift of location
:ot deterred by initial failure' (ord made a second attempt in 1955. e
acquired a new tract of land eighty miles downstream from (ordlandia near
the mouth of the Tapaoz' establishing the town of Belterra ;though(ordl*ndia was not entirely abandoned but reduced to an . To acquire the new location' the most
remote part of the original concession was e&changed for the equal,sized
land. Belterra ; was more flat and less damp' maing it
much more suitable for the rubber trees. ?learing at Belterra started early
in 195@ and (ord adapted housing and recreation to the Brazilian way of
life' which reduced construction costs and social tension. (ord also
imported some grafts from the )ast %sian plantations' where the trees had
been bred for resistance to the leaf blight. The new enterprise showed
more promise than its predecessor' but progress was slow. By 19@0' A00
employees were woring at (ordlandia while 2'A00 employees were
woring at Belterra.
/eir ;who was a plant pathologist> put much more emphasize on research
which was not considered as an issue earlier. )mphasis was put on theselection of trees with respect to their performance. /eir founded a
research laboratory and nursery at Belterra to e&periment with producing
high,yielding and disease,resistant strains of rubber. By a combination of
grafting methods' three sources of
-
8/13/2019 Case Study-Ford s Rubber Plantation
9/15
D.C.Singhal Page 9 of 15
comprising a root resistant against root diseases' a high yielding stem' and
a foliage resistant against leaf disease.
(or ten years (ord-s worers labored to transform soil into rubber. By 19@1'there were 5'A1'A00 rubber trees planted at (ordlandia and Belterra. 3n
19@2' the first commercial tappingof the rubber trees began yielding an
output of CA0tons of late& D far short of that year-s goal of 5E'000tons that
(ord needed annually. 3t was estimated that by 19A0 the two plantations
would produce that amount of rubber. owever' the new location was still
plagued with leaf fungus problems and technicians tried to contain the
epidemic through bud grafting.
Project Abandonment
(ord-s perseverance might have eventually paid offif it were not for the fact
that scientists developed economical synthetic rubberust as his Brazilian
plantation was establishing itself. %lso as /orld /ar 33 ended' the (ar
)astern rubber plantations were reopened ;which had been invaded by the
apanese in 19@1>. ence (ord saw no need to eep the Brazilianplantations open. 3n 19@A' enry (ord retired from the rubbering trade'
having lost the total investment of over F20 millionin Brazil without ever
having set foot there. % company press release announced the
abandonment of (ordl*ndia and Belterra with a bland epitaphG Hur war
e&perience has taught us that synthetic rubber is superiorto natural rubber
for certain of our products. The (ord Iotor ?ompany sold the land bac to
the Brazilian government for F2A0'000,, a toen sum. This was the amount
(ord owed his worers under Brazilian law as severance pay.
(ord-s losses in (ordl*ndia and Belterra are equivalent to F200 million in
modern ;2015> dollars.(ord was unable to buyhis way into rubber royalty'
and his efforts to spread his %merican healthy lifestyle met with
-
8/13/2019 Case Study-Ford s Rubber Plantation
10/15
D.C.Singhal Page 10 of 15
resentment and hostility... but history has repeatedly shown that obscene
wealth permits bizarre and astonishing mistaes on a grand scale as
(ordl*ndia proved.
The Lessons
/hy did the proect failJ
(ordKs vision for his new enterprise was conceived with a strictly
%merican perspective. e never considered the cultural differences
between %merican and Brazilian worers.
3nadequate initial studies. (ord didnKt consult with botaniststo determine
the colonyKs agricultural viability.
e installed %merican managers who new nothing about growing rubber
or about social engineering. Ianaging the plantation was a ob of
horticulturists and not (ord factory trained men.
3n the 1C years that (ordlandia and Belterra struggled to survive' enry
(ord never once visitedthe site.
%ll of this resulted in a multi,million dollar investment that failed. :o (ord
car rolled off the assembly line with (ordlandia-s rubber in it. The proect
was scrapped in 4ecember 19@A.
The plantation was slowly enveloped by the ungle.The ruins of (ordlandia
are now a stop on the %mazon rain forest tour. They are a graphic reminder
of an epic e&periment that was doomed from the start.
References
1 Fordlandia! The Rise and Fall of "enr# Ford$s For%otten &un%le
Cit#'by !reg !randin' :ew LorG Ietropolitan Boos' 2009.
-
8/13/2019 Case Study-Ford s Rubber Plantation
11/15
D.C.Singhal Page 11 of 15
( The Ruins of Fordlandia'%rticle M 20C by %lan Bellows.
http://www.a!ninte"e#ting.$o!/the%"&in#%of%fo"lania/
) Ford *otor Compan#$s +ra,ilian Rubber Plantations' Benson (ord
"esearch ?entre' opular "esearch Topics.http://www.thehen"'fo".o"g/"e#ea"$h/"&((e"Plantation#.a#p)
Iap of the %mazon Basin with Tapaois "iver highlighted
http://www.damninteresting.com/the-ruins-of-fordlandia/http://www.thehenryford.org/research/rubberPlantations.aspx%20%20%20%0D3http://www.damninteresting.com/the-ruins-of-fordlandia/http://www.thehenryford.org/research/rubberPlantations.aspx%20%20%20%0D3 -
8/13/2019 Case Study-Ford s Rubber Plantation
12/15
D.C.Singhal Page 12 of 15
+ate& being collected from a tapped rubber tree.
(ordlandia "ubber Trees' 195
http://www.thehenryford.org/research/rubberPlantations.aspxhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Latex_-_Hevea_-_Cameroun.JPG -
8/13/2019 Case Study-Ford s Rubber Plantation
13/15
D.C.Singhal Page 13 of 15
Bud !rafting in Belterra' 19@0
Blight,stricen rubber tree
-
8/13/2019 Case Study-Ford s Rubber Plantation
14/15
D.C.Singhal Page 14 of 15
(ordlandia Terracing' 1951
% typical (ordlandia house
http://www.thehenryford.org/research/rubberPlantations.aspx -
8/13/2019 Case Study-Ford s Rubber Plantation
15/15
D.C.Singhal Page 15 of 15
Terraced lantation of (ordlandia
+ocation of (ordlandia on side of "iver Tapaoz