DST - J bras Doenças Sex Transm 2015;27(1-2):54-57 - ISSN: 0103-4065 - ISSN on-line: 2177-8264

CASE REPORT

INTRODUCTIONSyphilis is a sexually transmitted infection caused by Treponema

pallidum(1). The number of reported cases still increases around the world, and, in Brazil, the National Program for Sexually Transmitted Diseases and AIDS Control estimates an annual incidence of 937,000 new cases of syphilis in the sexually active population(1,2). The incubation period for syphilis is 21–30 days after the initial contact with the microorganism and may vary from 10–90 days, depending on the virulence of the parasite, as well as the host response. The disease is classified into early (primary, secondary or latent) and late (also known as tertiary) or early congenital and late congenital syphilis(3,4). Oral lesions are mainly associated with secondary syphilis and can be the first clinical manifestation(5,6). Nevertheless, due to its clinical heterogeneity, depending on the stage of syphilis, the diagnosis of oral syphilis lesions can be a challenge to the clinicians(5,6). It occurs mainly in HIV positive patients that may present typical or atypical oral lesions(7). A nontreponemal serologic test, such as Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) test, is accepted as an effective testing strategy for detecting syphilis, although false-negative reaction can occur, particularly in HIV positive

individuals, delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis of syphilis occurs frequently(6,8,9). Sometimes, false-negative specific antitreponemal antibodies, such as Fluorescent Treponemal Antibody Absorption (FTA-ABS), can also occur. In such cases, oral manifestations and their histopathological exam may be pivotal to achieve the diagnosis of syphilis(7,10).

The aim of present paper was to report two cases of seronega-tive secondary syphilis in a HIV positive patient and a no HIV pos-itive patient, who had the diagnosis of syphilis obtained by biopsy of oral lesions.

CASES PRESENTATION

Case 1A 37-years-old man was referred to the Oral Medicine Service

of the Universidade Federal Fluminense with a history of multi-ple aphthous lesions, which partially resolved in three months. The patient was HIV-positive for four years. The CD4 lympho-cytes count was 596 cells/mm3 and the viral load was 5,838 cop-ies/mL at the time of the first oral evaluation appointment. The patient was not under any medication and a previous VDRL test (performed two weeks before) was negative. The patient had never had any major opportunistic infections since his first HIV positive test.

Oral examination revealed painful smooth ulcerations with slightly raised borders and granular center, as well as erythematous patches, on the buccal mucosa, tongue dorsal surface and soft palate

Diagnosis of seconDary syphilis through oral lesions in two patients with negative serology: case reports

Diagnóstico De sífilis secunDária através Das lesões orais em Dois pacientes com sorologia negativa: relatos De caso

Vanessa de Carla Batista dos Santos1, Bruna Lavinas Sayed Picciani1, Karin Soares Gonçalves Cunha1, Thays Teixeira de Souza1, Tábata Alves Domingos1, Rafael Quaresma Garrido2, Arley Silva Júnior1, Eliane Pedra Dias1

ABSTRACTSyphilis is a sexually transmitted infection, and oral lesion can be the first manifestation. The serology test, such as Venereal Disease Research Laboratory test, is accepted as an effective testing strategy for detecting syphilis, although false-negative reaction can occur, and oral lesions may be pivotal to achieve the diagnosis. We report two cases of seronegative secondary syphilis, a human immunodeficiency virus positive patient and a no HIV positive patient, whose histopathological exams were pivotal to achieve the diagnosis of syphilis. The serology may be negative in secondary syphilis and the oral lesions may represent the unique method to diagnostic.Keywords: oral lesion; syphilis; HIV; diagnosis.

RESUMOA sífilis é uma doença sexualmente transmissível, e a lesão oral pode representar sua primeira manifestação. Testes sorológicos, como Venereal Disease Research Laboratory, são rotineiramente utilizados para detecção de sífilis, entretanto, em alguns casos, podem ocorrer resultados falso-negativos. Nesses casos, as lesões orais são essenciais para o diagnóstico. Relatamos dois casos de sífilis secundária com sorologia negativa, em um paciente HIV positivo e um paciente HIV negativo, que obtiveram o diagnóstico de sífilis a partir do exame histopatológico das lesões orais. Os testes sorológicos podem ser negativos na sífilis secundária, e as lesões orais podem representar o único método diagnóstico.Palavras-chave: lesão oral; sífilis; HIV; diagnóstico.

1Postgraduate Program in Pathology, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) – Niterói (RJ), Brazil.2Project Praça Onze, São Francisco de Assis University Hospital, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) – Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil.

DOI: 10.5533/DST-2177-8264-2015271-210

Diagnosis of secondary syphilis through oral lesions 55

DST - J bras Doenças Sex Transm 2015;27(1-2):54-57

(Figure 1A-F). The clinical diagnosis was deep mycosis or syphilis. The patient signed the informed consent and an incisional biopsy of the buccal mucosa and tongue was performed.

Histopathological examination revealed hyperplasia, para-keratosis and papillomatosis of the epithelium and mononuclear and polymorphic inflammatory cells exocytosis. Microabscesses were also present. The lamina propria showed a dense and diffuse chronic inflammatory infiltrate composed mainly by plasma cells. The inflammatory infiltrate extended to the deeper area of the lam-ina propria and also showed a perivascular pattern. Obliterative end-arteritis characterized by endothelial swelling was also observed. The Warthin Starry stain showed the presence of spirochetal organ-isms (Figure 2). Neither spores nor hyphae of Candida spp were identified in Periodic Acid Schiff (PAS) stain and the cytopatholog-ical analysis was negative for candidiasis.

Another VDRL exam was requested, which was again negative. Based on the clinicopathological findings and despite a nega-tive VDRL, the final diagnosis was syphilis. The infectologist initi-ated a penicillin treatment. A FTA-ABS test and a third VDRL were requested, which were positives. The VDRL presented at titer 1:128. One week after the beginning of the treatment, the oral lesions had completely resolved (Figure 1 G,H) and, after two months, the VDRL at titer 1:16.

Case 2A 29-years-old woman was referred to the Oral Medicine

Service for evaluation of pain and migratory oral lesions with two month of duration. Her medical history revealed that she presented hepatitis B in 2009. Extraoral exam was normal, and oral exam revealed erythematous patches on the labial and

buccal mucosa (Figure 3A-D). The patient presented previous VDRL, FTA-ABS and HIV tests (performed one week before) negatives. The clinical diagnosis was deep mycosis or geo-graphic stomatitis. The patient signed the informed consent, and an incisional biopsy of the buccal mucosa was performed and a new VDRL requested.

A

E

B

F

C

G

D

H

Figure 1 – Clinical aspects of oral syphilis before and after treatment. Ulcers with slightly raised borders and granular center, as well as erythematous patches, on the tongue dorsal (A-C), tongue ventral surface (D), buccal mucosa (E), and soft palate (F). One week after the beginning of the treatment, the oral lesions had completely resolved (G,H).

A

C

B

D

Figure 2 – Histopathological aspects of oral syphilis. Fragment showed hyperplasia, parakeratosis and papillomatosis of the epithelium and mononuclear and polymorphic inflammatory cells exocytosis (A-B). The lamina propria showed a dense chronic inflammatory infiltrate composed mainly by lymphocytes and plasma cells with a perivascular pattern (C). The Warthin Starry stain showed the presence of spirochetes (D).

DST - J bras Doenças Sex Transm 2015;27(1-2):54-57

56 SANTOS et al.

Histopathological exam revealed buccal mucosa specimen depict-ing mild architecture changes on the left side and inflammatory changes on the rest of the tissue. Features observed were epithelial hyperplasia, parakeratosis, papillomatosis and neutrophils exocytosis with microabscess. The connective tissue demonstrated superficial and perivascular plasma cell inflammatory infiltrate, and the blood vessels exhibited swelling endothelial cells (Figure 4).

Neither spores nor hyphae of Candida spp were identified in PAS stain, and the cytopathological analysis was negative for candidiasis.

The histopathological exam suggested syphilis, and the VDRL was positive (titer 1:128). The patient was referred to the Infection Diseases Clinic and initiated a penicillin treatment. After of the treatment, the oral lesions had completely resolved (Figure 3E-H).

DISCUSSIONThe classical dilemma of the diagnosis of secondary syphilis faced

by many clinicians occurs due to the variability of the lesions(1,3,11). Skin manifestations of secondary syphilis occur in 75% of patients, and the primary chancre is still present in 15% of these patients(11). Various oral manifestations can be of diagnostic importance and are present in one-third to one-half of patients(12).

The diagnosis of secondary stage can be performed by specific and non-specific serological tests(8,11,12). Non-specific tests, such as VDRL, are the most common diagnostic tests used to diagnose syph-ilis and can be useful for screening large numbers of patients(8,12). VDRL becomes positive in 4 to 8 weeks after acquiring the infec-tion and the sensitivity approaches 100% in secondary syphilis due to the high antibody titers(8). VDRL is an inexpensive and use-ful screening test and is reactive in most patients with secondary and latent disease(8). However, in 1–2% of patients false-negative VDRL can occur due to prozone phenomenon. This occurs due to an inappropriate ratio of antibody versus antigen preventing their agglutination(8,9). This prozone phenomenon is frequently found in

pregnancy and HIV infection. The incidence of prozone phenome-non is very low in non-HIV patients with syphilis, ranging from 0 to 0.4%(9). Beyond VDRL, which is a non-specific test, other spe-cific tests are used for screening(8). Generally, FTA-ABS can be considered a very sensitive test in all stages of syphilis, which is still considered the golden standard(8). Very rare cases (0.35%) of false-negative FTA-ABS can occur and can be found in HIV infec-tion, autoimmune diseases and pregnancy.

In the case 1, patient had two negative VDRL and in the case 2, VDRL and FTA-ABS were negative. The patient 1 was HIV positive,

A

E

B

F

C

G

D

H

Figure 3 – Clinical aspects of oral syphilis before and after treatment. Erythematous mucosal plaque with mild white ulcerated center on the lip (A), buccal (B), palate (C) mucosa and the tongue (D). E-H pictures demonstrate partial regression of the lesions after seven days of treatment.

A

C

B

D

Figure 4 – Histopathological aspects of oral syphilis. Histopathological aspects exhibiting epithelial hyperplasia, parakeratosis, papillomatosis and neutrophils exocytosis (A). On the right side, in a higher magnification, epithelium with microabscess (B). The connective tissue demonstrated an intense chronic plasma cell inflammatory infiltrate on the surface and in depth perivascular (C) and the increased blood vessels with edematous endothelial cells (D).

Diagnosis of secondary syphilis through oral lesions 57

DST - J bras Doenças Sex Transm 2015;27(1-2):54-57

which justifies the presence of false-negative results, although they are rare. False-negative results occur because of impaired response of B lymphocytes to Treponema pallidum, or due to high antibody titers. However, patient 2 was not HIV-positive neither pregnant, showing that the phenomenon can occur in both tests and in any patient. In the literature, we did not find any case of false-negative in patient with hepatitis B. To our knowledge, this is the first case reported in the literature.

The occurrence of prozone phenomenon may be decreased when laboratories perform appropriate testing and dilutions. This is per-formed by diluting the patient’s serum to bring the antibody con-centration into the zone of equivalence. Nevertheless, many hospi-tal laboratories do not routinely test for the prozone phenomenon and, therefore, a laboratory error must also be considered in such cases of false-negative results. In the cases presented in this paper, the exams were performed in different references laboratories(13). In such cases, oral manifestations and their histopathological exam may be pivotal to achieve the diagnosis of syphilis(7,10). However, histopathological features are variable and the diagnosis of syphilis may also represent a challenge for pathologists(7,10).

In these present cases, there were no skin lesions, but the patients presented oral manifestations of syphilis, which allowed the diagno-sis. Several clinical differences have been described in many case reports of patients with HIV co-infection(14). Oral lesions at the sec-ondary stage persist from few days up to eight weeks and have a variety of clinical appearance, which may lead to a misdiagnosis(15). Usually, oral lesions present as multiple painful mucous patches, ulcers, deep ulcers and are located in the soft palate, dorsum of the tongue and vestibular mucosa(5,11,15).

In these cases, the patients were diagnosed with secondary syph-ilis through the biopsy of oral lesions, which presented different aspects, including erythematous patches and ulcers on the buccal mucosa, tongue and palate. Moreover, oral lesions and histopatho-logical exam may represented the unique method to diagnosis(4,5,10,11).

The histopathological characteristics of secondary syphilis are as variable as the clinical manifestations(10). Whereas the changes are often non-specific, findings of proliferation and obliterating endo-thelial, perivascular infiltrates with a preponderance of plasma cells, and epithelium psoriasiform hyperplasia support the diagnosis of syphilis(5,7,10). Similar histopathological features with the remarkable presence of hyperplasia, papillomatosis and microabscess in the epi-thelium were observed in these cases. The lamina propria showed a dense and diffuse chronic inflammatory infiltrate composed mainly by lymphocytes and plasma cells. In addition, silver stain and dark-field microscopy are useful to identify spirochetes in tissue sections and are helpful to achieve the diagnosis(7). In this patient, Warthin Starry stain showed the presence of spirochetal organisms, confirm-ing the diagnosis of syphilis. Based on the histopathological findings, another VDRL and FTA-ABS were requested, which were positive.

CONCLUSIONIn conclusion, the serology may be negative in secondary syphi-

lis in HIV patients and no HIV patients, making diagnosis difficult.

In these cases, the oral lesions and histopathological exam may rep-resent the unique method to diagnostic.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThe authors acknowledge the Universidade Federal Fluminense

and Brazilian agency CAPES for support.

REFERENCES1. Stamm LV, Mudrak B. Old foes, new challenges: syphilis, cholera and TB.

Future Microbiol. 2013;8(2):177-89. 2. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Departamento de DST, Aids e Hepatites

Virais. DST no Brasil. Available at: http://www.aids.gov.br/pagina/dst-no-brasil. Accessed 2013 Feb 7.

3. Lafond RE, Lukehart SA. Biological basis for syphilis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006;19(1):29-49.

4. Viñals-Iglesias H, Chimenos-Küstner E. The reappearance of a forgotten disease in the oral cavity: Syphilis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009;1(9):416-20.

5. Kelner N, Rabelo GD, Cruz Perez DE, Assunção JN, Witzel AL, Migliari DA, et al. Analysis of nonspecific oral mucosal and dermal lesions suggestive of syphilis: a report of 6 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014;117(1):1-7.

6. Compilato D, Amato S, Campisi G. Resurgence of syphilis: a diagnosis based on unusual oral mucosa lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108(3):45-9.

7. Ficarra G, Carlos R. Syphilis: The renaissance of an old disease with oral implications. Head and Neck Pathol. 2009;3(3):195-206.

8. Lautenschlager S. Diagnosis of syphilis: clinical and laboratory problems. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2006;4(12):1058-75.

9. Haslett P, Laverty M. The prozone phenomenon in syphilis associated with HIV infection. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154(14):1643-4.

10. Barrett AW, Dorrego MV, Hodgson TA, Porter SR, Hopper C, Argiriadou AS, Speight PM. The histopathology of syphilis of the oral mucosa. J Oral Pathol Med. 2004;33(5):286-91.

11. Dhaliwal S, Patel M, Menter A. Secondary syphilis and HIV. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2012;25(1):87-9.

12. Little JW. Syphilis: an update. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;100(1):3-9.

13. Lynn WA, Lightman S. Syphilis and HIV: a dangerous combination. Lancet Infect Dis. 2004;4(7):456-66.

14. Ramirez-Amador V, Madero JG, Pedraza LE, Garcia ER, Guevara MG, Gutierrez ER, et al. Oral secondary syphilis in a patient with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996;81(6):652-4.

15. Kelner N, Rabelo GD, Cruz Perez DE, Assunção JN, Witzel AL, Migliari DA, et al. Syphilis serology in human immunodeficiency virus infection: evidence for false-negative fluorescent treponemal testing. J Infect Dis. 1997;176(5):1397-400.

Address for correspondence:BRUNA LAVINAS SAYED PICCIANI Hospital Universitário Antonio Pedro, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Patologia, Universidade Federal FluminenseRua Marques de Parana, 303 – 4º andar Niterói (RJ), BrasilCEP: 24033-900E-mail: brunapicciani@yahoo.com.br

Received on: 04.30.2015Approved on: 08.03.2015