carl williams- metaphor, parapsychology and psi: an examination of metaphors related to paranormal...

8/3/2019 Carl Williams- Metaphor, Parapsychology and Psi: An Examination of Metaphors Related to Paranormal Experience and Parapsychological Research

1/19

1

Metaphor, Parapsychology and Psi: An Examination of

Metaphors Related to Paranormal Experience andParapsychological Research

CARL WILLIAMS

Williams, C. (1996). Metaphor, parapsychology and psi: An examination of

metaphors related to paranormal experience and parapsychological research.

Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 90, 174-201.

ABSTRACT: Recent research into metaphor and the role of imagination in

categorization has been particularly revealing. The contemporary view of

metaphor as proposed by Lakoff and Johnson (1980) attempts to provide a more

useful and accurate account of human experience than the current objectivist

explanations. In contrast to these, it emphasizes the importance of metaphor,imagination, and embodiment in our interactions with reality. This paper

focuses on the metaphorical constructions employed in categorizing the

phenomena investigated in parapsychology and psychical research. It is

proposed that three main metaphors have been used: intrusions,

transmissions/forces, and connections. These metaphors reflect the ways in

which researchers, interested parties, experients, and laypersons have sought to

structure their experiences and beliefs; as such, they provide valuable

information about the way in which these parties understand psi. In addition, a

brief examination is also made of the relevance of metaphors to quantitative and

qualititative research and their use in the rhetorical communication of psi

concepts.

It was all a machine yesterday. It is something like a hologram today. Who knows what intellectual rattle

we shall be shaking tomorrow to calm the dread of the emptiness of our understanding of the explanations

of our meaningless correlations. (Laing, 1982, p. 66)

Our ordinary conceptual system, in terms of which we both think and act, is fundamentally metaphorical in

nature. (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980, p. 3)

The essential point ... is that metaphors can sometimes have an extraordinary power, not only to extend the

thought processes of science, but also to penetrate into as yet unknown domains of reality, which are in

some sense implicit in the metaphor....it does suggest that scientific metaphors which link unrelated but

fundamental concepts may be especially significant. (Bohm & Peat, 1987, p. 41)

In the last few decades there has been a growing interest in examining language and the communication of

social reality. Credit must be given to Wittgenstein as the main initiator of this movement. In contrast to his earlier

theories, his later work argued that language is a toolkit and that word meanings are socially constructed

(Wittgenstein, 1958). Further support for this view came from the work of Reddy (1993). In his classic analysis of

the conduitmetaphor, Reddy proposed that contrary to our normal view, words are not discrete packages that

contain meaning (the meaning is in the words), but that meaning is constructed. Instead ofgetting my thoughts

across to you, my communication involves using symbols from which you construct a meaning, and as we share the

same culture this reconstruction should roughly correspond to the meaning I intended. We see the words themselves

as units of communication, as containers of meaning, and this position lulls us into thinking that information and

meaning is crystallized and independent of the communication process. Reddy proposes that it is much more fluid

and reliant upon what we bring to the communication from our cultural and conceptual background. This

postmodern focus on construction of meaning and the importance of text and textuality in psychology is succinctlycommunicated by Gergen (1994) and by Stenner and Eccleston (1994). This movement has caught the attention of


2/19

2

some parapsychologists. Perhaps most vocal has been Rhea White (e.g., 1994) who has repeatedly called for an

analysis of meaning in parapsychology and has proposed that the impetus for this might be derived from the

postmodern perspective. Recently, specific techniques such as discourse analysis, which was developed in

sociology, has been employed to examine linguistic devices used in accounts of the paranormal (Wooffitt, 1992).

However, this paper focuses on another aspect of this tide of textual analysis: that of metaphor.

Metaphor has been derided by philosophers (and generally avoided by scientists) throughout the history of

modern philosophy as an ornament on discourse that obscures meaning. If not simply an attractive decoration, it hasbeen viewed as a pernicious attempt to persuade people through rhetoric rather than evidence. This assumption is

obvious in the work of Hobbes (1651/1983) who equated right (rational) thinking with the right use of (literal)

language. It was inevitable therefore, that he considered the use of metaphor to be a ridiculous and deceitful affair,

and proposed that thoughts and knowledge were hindered and frustrated when words were used in such a way.

Using metaphor in Hobbes view was tantamount to lying and anyone who would base reasoning on metaphorical

language is sure to lead themselves and others astray from the truth (seeLeviathan , Pt. I, Chapter 4). John Locke

(1690/1975), another notable in the empiricist philosophical tradition, similarly thought that the only use of

metaphor was to "move the passions" and to "insinuate the wrong ideas," and "mislead the judgement" (seeEssay

Concerning Human Understanding, Bk. III, Chapter X, p. 34).

The important turning point in the way metaphor was viewed came with the work of Black (1954). He claimed

that in understanding metaphor we use a system of implications to organize and display relations in another field of

implications. No longer could metaphor be described purely in terms of rhetorical decoration, nor could the

possibility be dismissed that metaphor might play a primary role in creating our perception of the world. Metaphorsplace emphasis not simply on the properties of the actual objects to which they refer but on the relationships of any

object, its properties, and the similarities of these properties to those of other objects. The consequence of this view

of metaphor was the thoughtful possibility that we "project a world" through the tension between two existent

conceptual systems. Through the play of these systems we highlight patterns that are not necessarily simple

similarities but are facets that had not been previously sensed; we construct them and make explicit what was

implicit.

In his article "More about Metaphor," Black (1977) contends that:

some metaphors enable us to see aspects of reality that the metaphors production helps to constitute. But

that is no longer surprising if one believes that the "world" is necessarily a world under a certain

descriptionor a world seen from a certain perspective. Some metaphors can create such a perspective.

(p. 454)

A concrete example of this process can be found in the mechanization of the body. The Enlightenment saw the

dramatic splitting of mind from body and of thought from matter. Advocates of the mechanistic metaphor, such as

Descartes and La Mettrie, vividly described their vision of the body as a machine. The mechanisation of the body

provided the momentum for the extensive changes in the way we view animals, humans, society, and even the earth

itself. The image of the machine, with its familiar lawful regularity, its easy reduction to components, and its

revolutionary technological success was enthusiastically applied to all kinds of physical and social phenomena. In

some areas of human activity this was extremely (perhaps too) successful; for instance, in medicine and biology the

body became a machine to be repaired, the organs viewed as components to be examined and treated in isolation.

Modern medicine is having to reassess the consequences of this mechanistic view of patients and once again focus

on the person who reports the complaint.

The contemporary view of metaphor owes much to the groundbreaking work of George Lakoff and Mark

Johnson (1980). Their bookMetaphors We Live By provides a radical view of metaphor and its meaning and argues

that metaphor plays a role central to cognition itself. In this and other works Lakoff and Johnson; (Johnson, 1987;Lakoff, 1987); provide an extensive analysis of the role of metaphor in thought and language. They show that

metaphor is a form of cross-domain conceptual mapping, that highlights structural similarities between the

experience of the target and source domains in a coherent and systematic way. To give an example we often talk

about love as if it constituted a journey, as in "Weve hit a dead end street." "We cant turn back now." "Their

marriage is on the rocks." "The relationship is not going anywhere." "The relationship is at a crossroads."

These examples of everyday views of love and relationships convey the metaphorical sense of a journey. As

often happens the metaphorical representation (in this case a journey) is used to structure the more abstract

experience (in this case love). Love is mapped out in terms of a journey because there are inherent commonalities

between the two domains of experiencethe end of a relationship is the end of a journey; or a relationship can be

rough and stormy or smooth and uneventful, just like a sea crossing.

Lakoff (1987) and Johnson (1987) present a strong case for a new understanding of the generation of meaning

through metaphor, basic-level categories, and preconceptual systems such as image schemas. Basic- level categories

constitute prototypical exemplars of any category; for example imagine a bird and it is likely to be sparrow-likerather than emu-like and image schemas are regularities and patterns in the ordering activities of cognition. An


3/19

3

example of one of the most basic image schemas is that of the container. For instance, the mind is a container as in

"Get those ideas out of your head." "Ill keep that in mind." "Hes out of his mind."

Lakoff and Johnson stress an enactive view of cognit ion and advocate that imagination and embodiment be

accorded higher status in accounts of cognition and the categorization of experience. I will use the term metaphorin

the spirit of the contemporary view, although at times the terms analogy or symbol might be easily exchangeable

with it. In some cases, the metaphors may be obvious in their usage and relationship to the experiences they help to

structure. In other cases it will be necessary to be more sensitive to the context in which a term is employed in orderto perceive any relationships. This broad approach to metaphor departs from the strict definition as a linguistic

device and promotes a view of metaphor as an activity of cognition.

Studies of metaphors provide important insights into the construction of a discipline. Metaphors serve both to

focus and constrain thought and investigation within certain boundaries. In the history of psychology, the mind has

been seen as a wax tablet, a ghost (in the machine), a telephone exchange, a hydraulic system, and most recently and

possibly most influentially, a computer. Texts such as that by Soyland (1994) and Leary (1990) provide excellent

accounts of the changing metaphors used in psychological modeling, rhetoric, and discourse.

Generally, we fail to realize how much our language is dependent upon and constructed from metaphors, both

living and dead. Many metaphors eventually die and become part of literal discourse; for instance, the term mental

illness is currently used in the literal sense but was originally intended as a metaphor; in this sense, the literal is a

subclass of the metaphorical (Soyland, 1994). Adopting a strong view of metaphor, we may even argue that

everything is metaphor (Wheeler, 1987), even fundamental aspects of reality such as our cardinal concepts of time,

space, and measure (Jones, 1983).An analysis of metaphor can be focused on a number of levels which in reality overlap but might be useful for

some distinctions: (a) Looking at the broader issues of research paradigms and the discourse and rhetoric espoused

by the advocates and counter-advocates of a particular paradigm. (b) It can be applied to the specific models and

analogies used (implicitly or explicitly) to describe particular subject areas and their preconceptions: for example,

artificial intelligence and the mind is a machine metaphor. (c) Even more specifically, it can be used to observe

cognition itself and how distinctions and categorizations of reality are arrived at.

METAPHORS AND PSI

Like any other area of research, the history of psychical and parapsychological research is replete with

metaphors employed to conceptually isolate the elusive quarry psi (Hyman, 1989). This very elusiveness suggests a

primary metaphor ofquicksilveror mercury (White, 1985). As in other disciplines, there are benefits to be gained

from applying an analysis of metaphor to parapsychology. This approach highlights how paranormal phenomena

have been conceptualized by different parties, how the study of the paranormal has developed, and provides insightsinto what these exceptional experiences might mean to those people who have them. It also provides us with ideas

about how the subject of parapsychology is presented in the professional and public arenas.

An examination such as this taking into account the metaphors employed in the field of parapsychology is

somewhat rare but not entirely new. Hillman (1971) in examining the main images, and fantasies of parapsychology

noted the use of metaphors such as the involvement ofwill in relation to PK and intimacy in relation to apparitional

experiences. These particular metaphors indicate how these kinds of experiences are constructed as well as

indicating broader considerations such as the general spiritual orientation or anti-matterfantasy of many

parapsychologists.

Hess (1988) takes a certain delight in immersing himself in the metaphors and ideas of parapsychology. He

explores the identity and sexuality of parapsychology arguing that there is a hierarchy expressed in the field with

experimental modes of research having an elevated status over those that involve experiential investigations. In

addition experimental approaches tend to be described as being more masculine, they are considered as harder and

more objective than the feminine experiential approach.Exploring the role of dreams in psi experiences, Ullman (1984) views these communications as primarily

metaphorical in nature. According to Ullman, dreams are metaphors in motion, and psi that occurs during dreams

partakes of this metaphorical atmosphere. Ullman ultimately views dreams and psi as phenomena which bind the

individual to others and to the whole, as with metaphors they emphasise connecting patterns and relationships.

The metaphors in parapsychology and psychical research have been forged, adapted, and abandoned as the

times and society encouraged different perspectives on paranormal phenomena. For instance, we have seen theforce

involved in psychokinesis compared earlier to fluids and electricity and later to fields and quantum processes. The

few titles listed below (which probably occupy space on many of our shelves) give an inkling of the ways in which

paranormal phenomena have been envisioned: Phantasms of the Living, Mental Radio, Beyond Reality,

Parapsychology: Science or Magic.

Historically, the study of psi has been viewed as existing far outside the normal boundaries and concerns of 19th

- and 20th - century science. Whether proposing the possibility of contact with the dead or novel forms of

communication, books with titles such asBeyond the Reach of Sense (Heywood, 1974) andBeyond Reality (Rogo,1990) establish psi as an object of scrutiny out of this world; and to many the study of psi and its existence are seen


4/19

4

as existing in theMargins of Reality (Jahn & Dunne, 1987). These titles are naturally eye-catching and are no doubt

strategies to reach a popular audience; however, they also provide clues to how paranormal phenomena are

conceptualized. Some metaphors are used overtly; however, it may be argued that some of the metaphors that will

be examined are literal in their meaning. Accepting that much is yet to be learned about the nature of psi, it is

reasonable to consider some of these "literal" forms of describing psi as metaphorical (indeed, if we adopt the strong

view of metaphor, the literal is simply a subset of the metaphorical anyway). This helps to clarify the way in which

particular descriptions of paranormal experiences arise in certain contexts and how they are seen as being related toother types of phenomena.

PSI AS THE GRAIL

If for popular writers and some researchers psi research remains beyond the sensate world many skeptics would

tend to agree. For some, it belongs to the same world as religion, magic, alchemy and astrology. Alcock (1985), in

the Skeptics Handbook, illustrates the counteradvocates position that parapsychologists are looking for intangibles

that may be spiritual or quasi-religious but that at the very least are not scientific. To Alcock,

parapsychology is not the search to understand the anomalies that puzzle normal science; it is much more

the quest to demonstrate that certain anomalies can be found that demand for their explanation the existence

of forces or concepts as yet not accepted as possible by science. (p. 542)

Alcock lists the sciences and discoveries that have dropped by the wayside in the march of science towards truth:

alchemy, phrenology, N-rays, phlogiston. By association, psi and parapsychology can be seen as occupying a

similar position to these bygones. It is a fact that psychical research and parapsychology have been seen as reactions

to a growing materialism in the sciences. The advent of spiritualism, with mediumistic phenomena and a possible

channel to another world, those espousing such a view were offered the means by which to argue against

materialists. If true, these phenomena promised an afterlife and a mind free from the chains of matter. If

parapsychological research was concerned with these issues, then it was guilty of religious and spiritual motivations.

This is a sin according to the skeptics, but it is a blessing according to some writing from the parapsychological

perspective: "Parapsychology, once the despised outcast of a materialistically-orientated orthodoxy, may now claim

pride of place among the spiritual sciences; for it was parapsychology which pioneered the exploration of the world

beyond the senses" (Randall, 1975, p. 241).

James Randi (1975), in his book on Uri Geller, uses a religious metaphor when he refers to the search for the

holy "grail of ESP." By describing ESP as a holy relic that is mythical, precious, and wholly unattainable, heprovides the sense of a fruitless crusade. The association with religion rather than science is reinforced, thus

hammering home the idea that parapsychology is far removed from scientific orthodoxy and owes its origins more to

metaphysics and faith than empiricism and reality.

PSI IS PATHOLOGY

Counteradvocates and lay people have conceptually mapped out psi in terms of other domains such as illness

and medicine. Hyman (1989) considered parapsychology a good candidate for the titlepathological science. The

connotations are obvious: Parapsychology is an ailmentin thebodyof science and the remedy is surgery, to cut it

out! However, Hyman is more lenient; he argues that instead of being hounded out of science deviant scientists

should receive honest, constructive criticism to treat the pathology.

If pathologies do exist in the sense that some of our best scientists defend bizarre positions, then like allsicknesses, they are a symptom of something. Something is wrong and requires remedy. We cannot

discover what is wrong by bad diagnoses by failing to acknowledge the disease exists, by preventing

others from learning about it, or by isolating the disease from the main body of science. Good science

requires good and effective criticism. Bad and irrational criticism, even when the object is bizarre or

outrageous, benefits no one. (p. 250)

Perhaps the most popular form of the pathology metaphor is that of mental illness, and it is directed at those

who are likely to believe in exceptional phenomena, who report having had such experiences, or having investigated

them. For instance, according to astronomer Peter Sturrock: "Having talked to some experts in the UFO field, I am

convinced that 99.9 per cent of them are crackpots, psychopaths or otherwise unreliable characters" (in Evans, 1982,

p. 189).

Not only are UFO experts "mentally unreliable," so too are shamans and mediums (Gauld, 1982) points out:


5/19

5

Just as Victorian anthropologists were apt to think shamans merely crazy, so some psychiatrists and

clergymen have dramatically or unreflectingly asserted that many mediums are mentally disturbed and

probably certifiable. Such assertions are as mistaken in the latter case as in the former. (p. 21)

John Maddox, the editor ofNature, in a debate that took place at the University of Liverpool, argued that

psychic impressions are more likely to be hallucinations rather than true accounts of the world and that as such, they

are probably symptomatic of schizophrenia. Accordingly, he thinks

that to the extent that many of these phenomena are conceivably and quite probably the reports of people

suffering from real organic physical diseases of that kind, it is really rather cruel that we should humour

them by taking their reports seriously when appropriate medication would help them better. (Maddox,

1990, p. 22).

Although there may be important insights to be gained from the relationship between some mental health

problems and reports of paranormal experiences, a statement of the kind above insinuates that paranormal

experiences are only legitimate as a symptom of psychosis. The inclusion of paranormal experiences under the

umbrella of apsychopathology metaphor forces the issue of the irrationality of such experiences. Maddoxs speech

both intimates sympathy for the sufferer and encourages a view of unusual experiences as indications of pathology.

Lakoff and Johnson (1980) note that it is the people in power at any given time who reserve the right to create

the metaphors that people will live by. A similar view is expressed by Heise (1988) in relation to delusions:

These examples suggest that lay judgements of madness arise in conflicts over what constitutes a valid

reality in the everyday world. Those who stray too far from conventional and socially supported truths risk

having their beliefs turned into delusions and their character reduced to insanity. Judging people to be mad

and their beliefs to be delusions serves as a means of socially controlling cognition, and in contemporary

Western society it serves as a mechanism for protecting everyday sensate reality. (p. 268)

Interestingly, Beloff (1994) has used the pathology metaphor in a distinctly novel and more constructive way.

He describes paranormal phenomena as a violation of the natural order (p. 20). Nature reacts like a body in

response to infection; a severe infection will be met by an equally severe response. Just like infections, paranormal

phenomena flourish at first, only to be checked by the immune system resulting in their decline. The greater the

deviation from the norm, the longer the phenomenon will persevere before a return to equilibrium.

This very brief examination of some of the metaphors used in conceptualizing parapsychology and paranormalexperience has shown that rhetoric is employed to distance the phenomena and the subject from both science and

common sense. It might also be argued that the opposite situation may arise where a proponent may seek to use

"scientific" terminology and metaphors in order to solidify the position of certain parapsychological claims. Either

way, the use of metaphor is essential to this rhetoric. It will be seen later that certain metaphors are probably

employed precisely because they resonate with the current models in scientific research. I would like to extend this

and suggest that an examination of the metaphors implicit in descriptions of psychical phenomena can usefully

illuminate the ways in which these events have been conceptualized.

THREE CORE METAPHORS OF PSI PHENOM ENA

Intrusions

In the heady days of spiritualism there was an invasion of another world. The title of Hilary Evans book

Intrusionsseems a useful categorizing metaphor for these experiences. For example, take a look at Daniel Defoes

discussion of the matter:

By apparitions of Spirits, I mean when the invisible inhabitants of the unknown world[italics added], be

they who they will, assume human shapes, or other shapes, and show themselves visibly to us, so as that we

can see them, speak to them, hear them speak, and the like. . .

The question therefore is not so much whether there are any such things; but WHO, and WHAT, and

from WHENCE[italics added] they are, what business they come about, who sends them or directs them,

and how and in what manner we ought to think and act, and behave about them, and to them. (in Evans,

1982, pp. 62-64)

There is no doubt that the oldest posited cause of paranormal phenomena are spirits or ghosts that penetrate our

reality from another unseen world. These entities are often said to be ancestors, deceased relatives, or friends. The

structure of this schema consists of an image of an another world from which the occupants occasionally visit ourreality. In most religions and in mythology, there are numerous accounts of this other-world as an afterlife, spirit-

world, limbo, and other terms. The intrusion metaphor is also evident in anthropological studies of traditional


6/19

6

societies, which often employ spatial and entity schemas to make a demarcation between nature and civilization.

Typically, the area outside the village (especially the forest) is seen as occupied by spirits, and dangerous activities

such as walking alone in the bush are invitations to discarnate influence and possession; in fact, it is viewed as

flagrantly encouraging an intrusion into the self or the home.

The intrusion metaphor assumes that poltergeists and apparitions are the appearance of spirits that normally

occupy a different space to our own. Florence Cook manifesting Katy King and Mirabelli conjuring up the dead are

both viewed as creating a pathway from one world to the other. These experiences were inevitably seen as alienvisitations from another world that intruded upon and jarred our increasingly material, objective, and mechanized

reality.

There were good reasons for assuming that spirits were in attendance at sittings. In so far as the proceedings

included a measure of control for fraud, movements of objects and rapping sounds all suggested contact with a

presence, an intelligence, even if it was generally hidden from the eyes of the observers. In some cases, the presence

was felt more corporeally and the witnesses had good reason to assume that there were real entities intruding into the

space of the sance room. For instance, the impressive accounts of sittings with the medium D. D. Home feature

reports of observers seeing and holding disembodied hands. These hands ranged in size and flesh tone and felt warm

and solid, yet they also seemed to melt away from the firmest grip (Braude, 1986). These insinuations of human

form together with the sitters traditional religious beliefs in an afterlife provided a fitting construction of these

events. The notion of underlying communication or intention seemed to be a factor in these mediumistic displays as

well as in hauntingsthe spirit was often assumed to have something to communicate, hence their return to our

world. This reaches its peak in crisis apparitions where contact is made to inform someone that a death has takenplace.

One of the main concerns of the early investigators was the issue of survival. However, continued contact

between the psychical researchers and mediums eventually raised doubts over this issue and perhaps engendered a

change in emphasis and metaphor. Increasingly, there was less concern with the ostensible deceased entities that

sought to communicate with the living and more interest in the psychic performances themselves and with notions of

a possible underlying energy orpsychic force .

The intrusion metaphor has not lost its appeal in popular circles (or in other cultures). Choose any film

dealing with paranormal topics from Ghostbusters to Poltergeistand you are treated to entities imposing

themselves upon otherwise normal citizens, their homes and their refrigerators. We also have increasing reports

of alien abductions, mostly in the U.S. but to a lesser extent in Europe. These are intrusions with a modern

technological and extraterrestrial flavor in which the other worldis even further removed from us. It is likely

that there are similarities between these ideas and older ones of possession. The term intrusion is used simply

because it conveys the notion of a visit from another place; it is not meant to be viewed exclusively in a negative

light.

The intrusion metaphor relies upon particular image schematic structures: for example, that of the container

schema. An intrusion is made into a particular space, into consensual reality, albeit one which is often altered

for the benefit of the medium (i.e., carried out in the dark or in conditions of reduced light). In the development

of the metaphor ofpsychic force and in the case of poltergeist phenomena, the medium or agent is the space

from which the intrusion is made into sensate reality. In the investigation of the Miami poltergeist, researchers

mapped the trajectories of objects, noting the apparent influence of the individual at the center of the phenomena

(Roll, Burdick, & Joines, 1973). Insofar as the activities of the intruding entities or psychic forces manipulate

the environment, this can also be construed as a purposive means of communication. Further study of this

metaphor would usefully incorporate mythical and anthropological accounts of intrusions to extend and

elaborate the content and context of this metaphor.

Transmissions and Forces

The focus of attention of psychical research eventually shifted from the intrusion of entities to the ostensible

demonstration of psychic energy or force and also the anomalous transmission of information. The notion ofpsychic

force is an obvious forerunner of PK, which like ESP removes the necessity for any intruding entities, providing

instead a perspective which is more in line with the modern scientific informational or physical context for

understanding these phenomena. E.W. Cox exemplifies this shift of metaphors:

I have found no evidence, that the spirits of the dead are in any way concerned; on the contrary, the

evidence pointed entirely in the opposite direction. All the conditions under which the phenomena

presented themselves were entirely consistent with the exhibition ofa force emanating from some person or

persons presentand were wholly inconsistent with any reasonable hypothesis of action by those who have

passed into another state of existence. What is the nature of that force? if it be a product of nerve


7/19

7

organization, or a purely Psychic Force, is a question of the highest scientific interest that demands and, I

hope, will soon receive the most patient and profound investigation. (in Evans, 1982, p. 122)

Crookes came to the same conclusion: "These experiments appear conclusively to establish the existence of a new

force, in some unknown manner connected with the human organization [italics added], which for convenience may

be called the Psychic Force"[italics added] (in Evans 1982, p. 122).

Tyrrell (1947) dealt with the same issue arising from the study of poltergeists:

It looks much more as though a certain subconscious level of the personality, of a sub-intelligent character,

may be able to express itself by exercizing aphysical force of an unknown kind[italics added] which is

dependent on an abnormal physiological condition. The nature of this force is a mystery; but is the human

body free of mysteries? (pp. 215-216)

It is difficult not to draw parallels between the use of the metaphorpsychic force , Mesmers animal magnetism,

and the exploration of the nature of electricity at that time. This force was actually visible as an extension of the

body in some cases; at other times it was invisible but able to incur physical effects. Alvarado (1993) provides a

description of the development of notions of psychic force in the career of the physical medium Palladino. In her

case this force could be seen as a light, felt as a breeze, and observed as formations of arms and hands that receded

into her body. Alvarado discusses the ways in which these ideas of force are developed and maintained in the act ofcreating social reality, and he quotes the following from European researcher Flammarion:

This force is not immaterial. It may be a substance, an agent, emitting radiations having wave lengths

which do not affect our retina... In the absence of light rays this force can concentrate itself,

materialize, even assume a certain resemblance to a human body, act like our organs, knock violently

on a table, touch us. (in Alvarado, 1993, p. 282)

The increase in technological innovation during the early part of this century was undoubtedly instrumental in

encouraging the new metaphor of psi as a communication process rather than a matter of discarnate survival. Just as

psychic force drew on the development of electricity; telepathy was modeled on radio broadcasting. Sinclair

(1930/1962) inMental Radio likened "thought transference" to the processes that underlie electromagnetic radiation.

Can a thought or image in one mind be sent directly to another mind and there reproduced and recognized?If this can be done, how is it done? Is it some kind of vibration, going out from the brain, like radio

broadcasting? (p. 5)

Interestingly, he also offered a second somewhat different metaphor oflevels of mind: "Or is it some contact with a

deeper level of mind, as bubbles on a stream have contact with the water of the stream?" (p. 5)

The metaphors that are used to structure abstract or unusual phenomena do not arise arbitrarily; for instance,

mental radio no doubt received a boost from the discovery of "brain waves" or voltage fluctuations in the brain.

During the 1920s Italian neurologist Cazzamalli reported radio frequency radiations from subjects. However, as

Rush (1986) notes:

The only known electrical oscillations in the brain are the brain-wave potentials with frequencies of the

order of ten per second. The electrical power in these oscillations is minute, and the efficiency of radiation

from the brain at such frequencies is extremely low. The proble m of selectivity, of "tuning in" oneindividual pattern among a chaos of biological transmitters, is obvious. (p. 286)

Radio is a real-world application with known physical principles that provides a form for the less tangible processes

of ESP. As Lakoff and Johnson (1980) argue, cognition naturally employs metaphor to relate abstract, unknown

domains to known experiential structures developed from other domains, so anomalous communications such as psi

are mapped out in terms of known information transfer processes and technologies such as radio. This supplies a

rich context for analyzing the nature of psi in a way similar to that of normal processes of communication. A good

example of the range of possible metaphors drawn from scientific research in general is described by Stokes (1987)

in his review of theoretical parapsychology. From the current perspective these are metaphors; their originators no

doubt would consider them as literal possibilities.

As in other forms of information transfer, the signal will occasionally be interfered with or degraded by other

forms ofnoise. Some of the most recent developments in parapsychology have attempted to control this signal-to-

noise ratio. Techniques to reduce noise have been the basis of the development of the ganzfeld paradigm. Althoughthese efforts have been viewed as successful, Julian Isaacs argues that this is


8/19

8

a model of psi which parapsychologists have now been leery of for several decades. That is the

transmission model, where something moves from one place to another place, whereas the models of psi

which parapsychologists are increasingly interested in are holistic, synchronistic models, apparently acausal

or that have been given an acausal label, with which I do not agree, where things happen in ways that are

very non-local and which is compatible perhaps with the non-locality of quantum physics. (in Shapin &

Coly, 1989, p. 194)

In spite of Isaacs contention that a different model of psi has been implemented in parapsychological research,

the contemporary terminology of the discipline is largely characterized by terms such as sender,receiver, noise

reduction, andpsi signals; in the remote viewing paradigm the person at the target site is termed a beacon. These

terms are clear indications of the influence of the transmission metaphor, the captivating image of information

transfer processes and the necessity of tracing a causal sequence in those processes.

Morris (1975) emphasizes the difficulty in identifying the processes of psi. The usefulness of a transmission

metaphor is explored, but he stresses that we cannot be sure that transmission is actually occurring:

Since no channel is specifiable, communication itself has an element of ambiguity to it. Thus it may be

appropriate to identify psi as an implied or apparent or tacit communication. It is as ifcommunication took

place, but one cannot say for sure. There seems to be a receiver, and a message and a source; we dont

know whether there is truly a channel or not. (pp. 182-183)

Recently, Bem and Honortons (1994) paper on the results of the Ganzfeld was published in the prestigious

Psychological Bulletin. The title of this paper is "Does Psi Exist? Replicable evidence for an Anomalous Process of

Information Transfer." The Ganzfeld work pioneered by Honorton has delivered some of the best results in

parapsychological research, and most would agree that the quality of the work is outstanding and certainly worthy of

presentation to the psychological community. Bem and Honorton employ the information transmission metaphor,

perhaps because it provides the only currently acceptable image of the way in which psi might operate

(contemporary psychology as a discipline is predominantly characterized by reductionistic and mechanistic

metaphors). The Ganzfeld might increase the probability of psi occurring in a number of ways; an obvious

alternative to the noise reduction theory is that it encourages the development of receptivity to a more collective

level of personality (this possibility is suggested in Sinclairs second metaphor, in Tyrrells work, and in Swann,

1987).

Explicit reference to an information transfer metaphor is made in the recent work of May, Spottiswoode, andJames (1994). They purposefully construct and examine the metaphor in an attempt to provide an understanding of

the influence of target characteristics in anomalous cognition experiments. May et al. were concerned with the

relationship of Shannon entropywhich they define as a measure of our uncertainty, or lack, of information, about

a system (p. 263) and how this relates to target images used in experiments. They propose that a reductionist

approach following information theory and using the explicit information transfer metaphor provides circumstantial

evidence for possible receptors of psi or anomalous cognition. It would seem that Isaacs contention that the

information transfer model is outdated was premature. The fact that May et al. note that they are working with a

metaphor should be applauded, and their work indicates how different metaphors can be usefully explored without

resorting to notions of one correct view. Any metaphor operates within a limited context, revealing some aspects

(and hiding others) of the phenomenon being explored.

Researchers such as Tyrrell (1947) considered that telepathy was less about the transmission of thought and

more about cues from a subliminal level of the personality. Adopting a depth-psychological account of self, people

can be seen as volcanic islands projecting above the sea; underneath they slope to a common ground from whichthey came and in which they are all connected. Swann (1987) presents the case against the transfer metaphor in his

bookNatural ESP; again, like Tyrrell, he develops a depth metaphor for psi (these depth metaphors will be

encountered again in the next section with respect to Jungs notion of synchronicity). Swann makes the important

objection that the some metaphors of ESP can hinder performance and lead one to have the wrong expectations of

psi.

I was able to conclude (correctly so) that ESP must work and function on its own by mechanisms not

recognizable to my brain learning, even though I possessed lots of labels that served me intellectually.

There was no direct connection between these labels and real ESP mechanisms. To put this another way,

my labels served as filters or barriers to true real ESP experience! The labels were acting as mental

preconceptions about what should be experienced intellectually.... It was only after I learned to detach

myself from the power of these labels that some of ESPs mechanisms revealed themselves. (p. 2)


9/19


10/19

10

given the difficulty of framing empirical investigations in terms of the connections of a holistic metaphor. Jaff

(1962) emphasizes the holistic nature of psychic reality in synchronistic phenomena:

Basically, both sender and recipient are mere instruments of the autonomous archetype and its

ordering effect on space and time; or, they may be fellow actors in the drama of an archetypal situation.

Man and his conscious mind and will power are pushed into the background by the Objective-Psychical, the

Archetype. It is possible that the impersonal, a-causal process of ordering (such as the doubling ofthought content into two physically separate persons) can occur even if nothing is consciously being

transmitted.

(p. 114).

Jung, speaking to the Society for Psychical Research on "The Psychological Foundations of Belief in Spirits" in

1919, emphasized that he thought that there was no doubt that the existence of spirit explanation for these

phenomena was without basis and that a more useful answer must lie in the domain of physics as much as in

psychology. In a revised version (Jung, 1960) of this speech, Jung wrote:

I for one am certainly convinced that they are exteriorizations. I have repeatedly observed the telepathic

effects of unconscious complexes, and also a number of parapsychic phenomena, but in all this I see no

proof whatever of the existence of real spirits, and until such proof is forthcoming I must regard this whole

territory as an appendix of psychology. (Jung, 1920/1960, p.318)

In the revision Jung added this footnote about the above passage:

After collecting psychological experiences from many people and many countries for fifty years, I no

longer feel as certain as I did in 1919, when I wrote this sentence. To put it bluntly, I doubt whether an

exclusively psychological approach can do justice to the phenomena in question. Not only the findings of

parapsychology, but my own theoretical reflections, outlined in On the Nature of the Psyche, have led me to

certain postulates which touch on the realm of nuclear physics and the conception of the space-time

continuum. This opens up the whole question of the transpsychic reality underlying the psyche.

(Jung, 1960, p. 318)

Rush (1986) notes that theories tend to follow fashions; more accurately, theories draw on the current models

and metaphors in circulation and do so to the degree that these are successful. It has been mentioned that Mesmersanimal magnetism found its inspiration in electromagnetism and telepathy as mental broadcasting was developed

during the early days of radio. Physics in general provides a rich source domain for structuring concepts of psi.

Accounts of the many different physical and quasi-physical theories have been the subject of discussion in a number

of review papers (Chari,1977; Rush, 1986; Stokes, 1987). There are field metaphors describing a psychic energy

(from chemical/physical processes in the brain) as radiating out and influencing other brains at a distance. Showers

of particles, orpsitrons, have been postulated that appear unimpeded by distance or barriers. Psi fields have been

proposed that are connected with organisms and inanimate objects and can interact at times depending on attention,

motivation, and other psychological factors (see Rush 1986, for further details).

In addition to these physical metaphors, there have been attempts to structure psi employing concepts of four-

dimensional space-time developed from relativity theory. In effect, this would permit a shortcut between two events

and a possible psi connection in higher dimensions. One account of telepathy and precognition has employed the

term resonance to describe how ESP may occur (Marshall, 1960). It is conjectured that two complex systems, such

as human brains, might synchronize and a thought pattern in one be reproduced in the other. These physical andquasi-physical theories all draw on theories and models circulating in physics and inevitably rely on metaphors as

these processes are often beyond common sense cognition. In the words of Hardison (1989), science has gone

beyond the normal limits of direct human cognition.

We no longer face a world viewed from the middle distance where Newtonian objects are Solid,

massy, hard, impenetrable... [instead]...nature has slipped, perhaps finally, beyond our field of vision.

We can imitate it in mathematicswe can even produce convincing images of itbut we can never

know it. We can know only our own creations. (p. 1)

A recent holistic metaphor that attempts to illustrate the nature of wholeness through concrete example is that of

the hologram. Working independently, physicist David Bohm (1980) and neurobiologist Karl Pribram (1971)

proposed that the hologram might be a good analogy to the universe and also to the brain. So that, in effect, you

have a holographic brain interpreting a holographic universe. Initially, this metaphor was received enthusiastically,used widely, and some would say too loosely (Blackmore, 1992). In the years since its introduction, its popularity


11/19

11

has weakened a little (see Soyland, 1994 for a discussion of the holographic memory model in cognitive

psychology). The holographic metaphor emphasizes the interconnectedness of nature, each part being related to

every other part just as in the hologram itself every part is encoded throughout the interference pattern on the

photographic plate. By illuminating a particular region of the holographic plate we still see the whole image but

with less detail and from a decreased range of possible points of view.

Holistic metaphors almost seem readymade for the elusive nature of psi. Some have commented that ESP and PK

are inevitable in a holographic universe because of fundamental connectedness. As Krippner (1982) notes: "ESPand PK are necessary components of that [holographic] universe. Indeed, holographic theorists would have to

hypothesize the existence of ESP and PK had not parapsychologists carefully documented their existence over the

years" (p. 124).

Synchronicity and holograms aside, most of the momentum for this view of interconnectedness and wholeness

has been provided by the growing popularity and mystery of quantum physics. It should be noted that quantum

physics is heavily tinged with metaphor itself (not surprising, as it deals with a truly abstract realm). The

explanation of psi in terms of quantum mechanics draws a link between psi and quantum mechanical events.

Quantum events are probabilistic, independent of time and space, and constitute correlations of states rather than

energy transmission. Some researchers (e.g., Walker, 1975) have proposed accounts in which an organisms

intention might influence an indeterminate quantum situation.

Another interpretation is offered by observational theories, in which it is proposed that the imagined process and

the quantum process correlate. The term observational theories has been used to describe accounts of psi derived

from explanations of quantum theory following the Copenhagen interpretation. In short, they assume that theobserver paradox in quantum physics (illustrated by the famous example of Schrdingers cat) indicates that events

are in a state of superposition prior to any measurement or observation being made (the cat is both dead and alive).

Once this all important observation is made, the wave function collapses, the superposition is ended, and an

identifiable and located event takes place. The observational theories present a view of ultimate interconnectedness,

which complicates the task of devising appropriate empirical designs to test these theories. They require extra

precautions that transcend the normal levels of security applied to sources of possible sensory leakage; for instance,

they even require the consideration of possible leakage from any future examination of the results of such an

experiment (Lucadou, 1994).

Jahn and Dunne (1987) explicitly describe psi in terms of quantum mechanics. Their approach is remarkably

similar to the work of Lakoff and Johnson (1980). They note that idioms of the English language often employ

metaphorical structures based on spatial schemas, which are extended to abstract emotional and cognitive

experience. In particular that:

impressionistic verbal allusions to physical distance are commonly used to describe all manner of cognitive

or emotional situations. A person is described as a close friend or distant relative, as deep in thought

or high as a kite; an idea may be central, remote, or far out; and we allow our minds to wander

over various conceptual grounds, before taking a position on an issue. Lucid as these analogies may

be, they are inherently qualitative; to quantify such consciousness dimensions, some referential standard

must be establishedsome conceptually evident stride, meter, or wavelength, as it werein terms of

which consciousness distance may be specified in quantitative form. (p. 229)

Jahn and Dunne build on this and dev elop a metaphorical interpretation of humans as quantum particles,

mapping human characteristics of subjective experience in terms of the processes of quantum events. They

construct the image of a human as a particle, or rather a "quantum wave-mechanical model of the rudimentary

consciousness atom," (p. 251) which is capable of interacting with other humans and with the environment by all

those means available to the analogous physical wave systems, including wave-mechanical collisions, interatomicradiation, evanescent wave tunneling, or escape to free wave status. Each of these actions is metaphorically

projected from the domain of observations of physical systems to those of consciousness and different aspects of

normal and anomalous communication. Amo rim (1994) develops Jahn and Dunne's proposal by drawing on the

work on analogy and metaphor in understanding scientific concepts (e.g., Gentner, 1983). He proposes the

importance of developing metaphorical models of psi phenomena; in particular he advocates examining the

observational theories and the possible isomorphy between the structure of quantum and psi phenomena.

Jahn and Dunnes use of metaphor provides an important and valuable means to describe and explore an

abstract domain such as the experience of psi. In their linkage of the sub-atomic world with experiments in

parapsychology, they knit together two domains that are difficult to conceptualize; but more than that, they

accomplish this through the use of a coherent and systematic account, d rawn from real-life cognition, which is

metaphorical in nature. Beyond this as Amorim (1994) proposes, Jahn and Dunnes quantum metaphor is also

important in that it leads to testable hypotheses.

There are enormous difficulties in dealing with a world or a conception of a world which is ultimatelythoroughly interconnected. For instance, any reductionist isolation of elements is temporary and may actually


12/19

12

detract from the phenomenon it seeks to describe as much as it promises to clarify its nature. When these elements

are taken in their natural state, as active relationships, they present a "truer" yet fuzzier picture of the underlying

reality than they do when taken out of context and out of relationship. This is becoming an accepted consequence in

terms of fuzzy logic accounts of reality (Kosko, 1994), where in black and white solutions seem to deliver clarity yet

are inaccurate in nature and grey accounts lead to fuzziness but describe a process better. In structuring this reality,

it is important to use a instrument suitable for the jobmetaphor is eminently qualified for this. Metaphor is a

means of qualifying and depicting relationships. It is naturally incomplete and limited, but it provides as accurate aview as possible when you reach into a reality which is not about isolated parts but about wholeness. Battista (1982)

proposes that the appropriate methodology for a holistic paradigm is one that uses analogy (and presumably

metaphor). The schema on which the holistic metaphor relies is one of relationship and connection (human and

conceptual), notions of inclusivity and belonging, the recognition of gestalt, and the emergence of higher orders (the

whole is greater than the sum of the parts); these ideas all perhaps contribute to the formulation of the connections

metaphor.

CONCLUSIONS

This brief examination shows that the history and interpretation of psi (like any domain of experience) has relied

heavily on metaphor, and reinforces the idea that humans (scientists included) are an inexhaustible source of

analogies of the universe (Bohm & Peat, 1987). It may also support the contention of Lakoff and Johnson (1980)

that cognition is fundamentally metaphorical in nature. In any discipline, it must pay dividends to be aware of the

natural and contrived use of metaphor, whether it be in reports of personal experiences, in the development ofmodels, or in rhetoric. This brief review of the use of metaphor in parapsychology and psychical research has done

little more than skim the surface of a deep and fascinating vein of cognitions and constructions of the paranormal.

Even so, it has illuminated a few interesting issues that might encourage further forays into the conceptual nature of

different parapsychological phenomena and the categories to which they are assigned (see Table 1).

[ INSERT TABLE 1 ABOUT HERE ]

This account might be viewed simply as a historical summary of the ways in which popular and academic

opinion have changed with regard to psi. These metaphors have been favored in different forms at various times in

different cultures and they can be seen as also occurring sequentially in the last century or so of research into the

paranormal. Although such a view sheds light on the changes in approaches to psi and how they were engendered, itis more instructive to consider its primary meaning. That is, we have accounts of psi; they are constructed (drawing

upon cultural images and imaginative structures which are in turn derived from the experience of embodiment); and

further, the main instrument used in the conception and communication of these experiences is the metaphor. Each

view of psi involves seeing it as an entity of different proportions, with different connections and alliances within a

network of thought and experience. Work within an approach characterized by a particular metaphor would be most

coherent where it followed the methods and entailments proper to that metaphor. It might be argued that this view

of metaphor and reality is entirely relativistic and that there is no reason to suggest that one metaphor has any

advantage or privilege over another. To a certain extent any analysis of metaphor, like the spirit of interpretation

within the postmodern view, is "local" and "contingent" (Gergen, 1994) and without aspirations to a "Gods eye

view" of reality. It is also, however, grounded in the objectivity which derives from the common experience of

human embodiment. Perhaps, of those metaphors on offer, we value those that are most harmonious in relation to a

particular culture, time, and place. We feel that in our particular context, we cannot endorse a view of spirits and

adopt the schema of transmissions, whereas a more traditional culture would find the concept of spirits moremeaningful.

Some metaphors are more harmonious, more revealing than others. For instance, the mind is a computer

metaphor has provided a concrete exemplar of the activity of thought; it allows us to view thought as symbol

manipulation by algorithms, with such stages as information acquisition,processing , storage, and retrieval it has

permitted the conceptual dissection of difficult abstract processes. In attempting to model cognition it provides a

means to investigate and discuss certain (computer-like) aspects of cognition but at the cost of other aspects such as

meaning and feeling. Meaning arises not from algorithms, which are the centerpin of the computer-mind metaphor,

but instead, from the sense of embodiment, feeling, and imagination involved in being an organism. A metaphor of

mind that is organic rather than mechanistic and algorithmic must have advantages for speaking about meaning for

organisms. Artificial intelligence or cognitive science computer models that resort to symbol manipulation and

simulation of thought (but without any ambition to provide "true" accounts of human thought) cannot be criticized.

However, those who aim to portray thought in this image are inevitably non-starters: they fail to recognize that most

thought is not algorithmic but image-schematic, metaphorical, and dependent on the experience of embodiment.


13/19

13

An examination of metaphor provides a revealing account of the ways in which we construct our experience.

The metaphors employed in accounts of experiences, or in scientific models, are almost certainly dependent upon

availability. The preference for information transmission metaphors not only corresponds to a current technological

stancewe can readily interpret it and see its relevance to ESPbut is more amenable to a discipline that

predominantly consists of researchers trained in contemporary psychology. There is more mileage in this metaphor

of psi for psychologists who are already concerned with the operations of information processing. The intrusion

metaphor has little relevance to this group of researchers and is kept alive by the spiritualists. The holisticconnections metaphor has most relevance in physics and accounts of mysticism; in general, holism has received little

attention in mainstream psychology.

A few reasons among many for thinking about the metaphors we employ in parapsychological research are as

follows:

1. Metaphors are important because they are primary to human understanding of experience. They reveal how

phenomena are structured, categorized, and thus made meaningful. Taking a practical position, this might be

reflected in the mentation of participants in Ganzfeld studies. For instance, an experimenter should encourage the

participant to take into account those images that might be more metaphorical than representational, in a literal or

realistic sense, in their judgments on a target pool. It is also worth taking account of and encouraging the

metaphorical expressions that the participants employ in describing their experiences, as they may contribute to an

understanding of the best attitude to take in psychological space (see Jahn & Dunne, 1987) for successful psi

performance.

2. Some metaphors are likely to be culturally and temporally contingent. They depend upon changes in society and

the domains from and onto which metaphor is mapped. For instance, the transmissions metaphor of psi has more

currency in a technology-based environment than in less developed countries where the intrusion metaphor may be

more influential. Metaphors in science change over time and within different communities. This is also the case for

the distinction between academic research and public use of metaphor. A researcher will probably have a different

conception of ostensible paranormal events compared to someone with limited or no background knowledge; this is

an important consideration in the investigation of spontaneous cases. An example here would be the tendency of

experients to concretize the event in terms of energy or entities, whereas the researcher would be less likely to

assume such concrete forms.

3. Insofar as metaphors are experientially accurate, that is, reveal a meaningful conception of an event or

phenomenon to a particular person within a particular context, they obviate the need for decisions of veridicality.They permit an examination of something which is "real" to the experient within a given meaningful framework.

For instance, a depth psychological approach might be employed here, taking the form of a concern for the

relationship of the unusual experience to other aspects of an individuals life. An examination of a paranormal

experience within a particular metaphor may perhaps explicate themes and issues of relevance to the experient

without necessarily resorting to testing the validity of the experience. Metaphors can provide a basis for further

exploration, for comparison with similar kinds of experiences, and for identifying and classifying patterns of unusual

experience.

4. Cognitive schemas and metaphors applied to paranormal experiences may influence the kinds of phenomena that

occur. Changing metaphors reflect new areas of interest and perhaps bring about changes in the frequency of the

phenomena. If we assume that our expectations and understanding inform paranormal events to any degree, then we

may influence the form and content of the experience in line with the metaphors we hold. For example, the

preference for an information transmission model might be part of the reason for the decrease in major psychicalphenomena associated more with the intrusion metaphor. We might require the trappings of the sance room and the

schema of the intrusion metaphor in order to generate major psychical phenomena. Also, popular metaphors such

as transmissions can help to structure and identify cogent areas of research, inevitably reducing efforts towards

research related to less popular metaphors such as intrusions. Exploring new forms of metaphors might

revolutionalize how we conceptualize parapsychological phenomena. Perhaps it would even lead us to observe

entirely new forms of psi.

5. Finally, perhaps we could generate a "meta-metaphor" and posit that metaphor is similar to psi. In essence, with

both metaphor and psi there is an overlap of two seemingly disparate entities or domains; and it is the relationship

between them that is paramount. In this process, it is the tension between the two, the sense of difference and of

similarity that coordinates fresh perception and awareness. In experiencing psi we perceive some connection

between ourselves and some other, a sensation of something significant, something briefly shared between two

separate beings. The same is true of metaphor: a connection is made between two seemingly separate concepts.Inevitably, this is something that cannot be pinned down or reduced completely (metaphor cannot be examined itself


14/19

14

except through other metaphors) and does not have an essentialfixednature; it is not an object but a sense of

relationship. Might this also be true of psi?


15/19

15

REFERENCES

Alcock, J. E. (1981). Parapsychology: Science or Magic? A Psychological Perspective. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.

Alcock, J. E. (1985). Parapsychology as a "spiritual" science. In P. Kurtz (Ed.), Skeptic's Handbook (pp. 537-565).

Buffalo, NY: Prometheus.

Alvarado, C. S. (1993). Gifted subject's contributions to psychical research: The case of Eusapia Palladino.

Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 59, 269-292.

Amorim, M. A. (1994). Do quantum mechanical concepts help to understand psi phenomena? Proceedings of

Presented Papers: The 37th Annual Convention of the Parapsychological Association, pp. 18-34.

Battista, J. R. (1982). The holographic model, holistic paradigm, information theory and consciousness. In K.

Wilber (Ed.), The Holographic Paradigm and Other Paradoxes: Exploring the Leading Edge of Science (pp. 143-

150). Boulder, CO: Shambhala.

Beloff, J. (1994). Lessons of history. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 88, 7-22.

Bem, D. J., & Honorton, C. (1994). Does psi exist? Replicable evidence for an anomalous process of informationtransfer. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 4-18.

Black, M. (1954). Metaphor. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 55, 273-294.

Black, M. (1977). More about metaphor. Dialectica, 31, 431-457.

Blackmore, S. J. (1992). The holographic fallacy. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 58, 270-273.

Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the Implicate Order. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Bohm, D., & Peat, F. D. (1987). Science, Order and Creativity. New York: Bantam.

Braude, S. E. (1986). The Limits of Influence: Psychokinesis and the Philosophy of Science. London: Routledge &Kegan Paul.

Chari, C. T. K. (1977). Some generalized theories and models of psi: A critical evaluation. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.),

Handbook of Parapsychology (pp. 803-822). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Evans, H. (1982). Intrusions: Society and the Paranormal. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Gauld, A. (1982). Mediumship and survival: A Century of Investigations. London: Paladin.

Gentner, D. (1983). Structure- mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7(2) , 155-170.

Gergen, K. J. (1994). Exploring the postmodern: Perils or potentials? American Psychologist, 49, 412-416.

Gurney, E., Myers, F. W. H., and Podmore, F. (1886). Phantasms of the Living. London: Trubner's.

Hardison, O. B. (1989). Disappearing Through the SkylightCulture and Technology in the Twentieth

Century. London: Penguin.

Heise, D. R. (1988). Delusions and the construction of reality. In T. F. Oltmanns & B. A. Maher (Eds.),

Delusional Beliefs (pp. 259-272). New York: Wiley.

Hess, D. J. (1988). Gender, hierarchy, and the psychic: An interpretation of the culture of parapsychology.

Proceedings of Presented Papers: The 31st Annual Convention of the Parapsychology Association, pp. 341-353.

Heywood, R. (1974). Beyond the Reach of Sense. London: Chatto & Windus.

Hillman, J. (1971). On the psychology of parapsychology. In A. Angoff & B. Shapin (Eds.),A Century of PsychicalResearch: The Continuing Doubts and Affirmations (pp. 177-187). New York: Parapsychology Foundation.


16/19

16

Hobbes, T. (1983). Leviathan. Glasgow: Collins Fount. (Original work published 1651)

Hyman, R. (1989). The Elusive Quarry: A Scientific Appraisal of Psychical Research. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus.

Jaff, A. (1962). Psychological aspects of spontaneous cases . International Journal of Parapsychology, 4(2), 97-

120.

Jahn, R. G., & Dunne, B. J. (1987). Margins of reality: The Role of Consciousness in the Physical World. New

York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. Chicago, IL:

University of Chicago Press.

Jones, R. (1983). Physics as Metaphor. London: Abacus.

Jung, C. G. (1960). The Psychological Foundations of Beliefs in Spirits (pp. 301-318). In The Structure and

Dynamics of the Psyche . (Collected Works of C. G. Jung, Vol. 8). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original

work published 1920)

Kosko, B. (1994). Fuzzy Thinking. The New Science of Fuzzy Logic. London: HarperCollins.

Krippner, S. (1982). Holonomy and Parapsychology. In K. Wilber (Ed.), The Holographic Paradigm and Other

Paradoxes: Exploring the Leading Edge of Science (pp. 124-125). Boulder, CO: Shambhala.

Laing, R. D. (1982). The Voice of Experience. New York: Pantheon Books

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago, IL:

University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Leary, D. E. (1990). Metaphors in the History of Psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

LeShan, L. (1974). The Medium, the Mystic and the Physicist. London: Turnstone.

Locke, J. (1975). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding . (P. H. Nidditch, Ed.). Oxford, England: Clarendon

Press. (Original work published 1690)

Lucadou, W. v. (1994). The endo-exo-perspectiveheaven and hell of parapsychology. Proceedings of Presented

Papers: The 37th Annual Convention of the Parapsychological Association, pp. 242-252.

Maddox, J. (1990). This house believes in ghosts. British & Irish Skeptic , 4, 18-22.

Marshall, N. (1960). ESP and memory: A physical theory. British Journal for Philosophy of Science , 10, 265-286.

May, E. C., Spottiswoode, S. J. P., & James, C. L. (1994). Shannon entropy as an intrinsic target property: Towarda reductionist model of anomalous cognition. Proceedings of Presented Papers: The 37th Annual Convention of the

Parapsychological Association, pp. 261-272.

Morris, R. L. (1975). Tacit communication and experimental theology. In J. D. Morris, W. G. Roll, & R. L. Morris

(Eds.),Research in Parapsychology 1974 (pp. 179-198). Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press.

Noll, R. (1989). C. G. Jung and J. B. Rhine: Two complementary approaches to the phenomenology of the

paranormal. In B. Shapin & L. Coly (Eds.), Parapsychology and Human Nature (pp. 57-80). New York:

Parapsychology Foundation.

Pribram, K. (1971). Languages of the Brain. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Randall, J.L. (1975). Parapsychology and the Nature of Life . London: Souvenir Press.


17/19

17

Randi, J. (1975). The Magic of Uri Geller. New York: Ballantine.

Reddy, M. J. (1993). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A.

Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (2nd ed., pp. 164-201). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Rogo, D. S. (1990). Beyond Reality: The Role Unseen Dimensions Play in Our Lives. Wellingborough, England:

Aquarian.Roll, W. G., Burdick, D. S., & Joines, W. T. (1973). Radial and tangential forces in the Miami poltergeist. Journal

of the American Society for Psychical Research, 67, 267-281.

Rush, J. H. (1986). Physical and quasi-physical theories of psi. In H. L. Edge, R. L. Morris, J. Palmer, & J. H.

Rush, Foundations of parapsychology (pp. 276-292). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Shapin, B., & Coly, L. (Eds.). (1989). Parapsychology and Human Nature. New York: Parapsychology

Foundation.

Sinclair, U. (1962). Mental Radio .(rev. 2nd ed.) Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas. (Original work published

1930)

Soyland, A. J. (1994). Psychology as Metaphor. London: Sage.

Stenner, P., & Eccleston, C. (1994). On the textuality of being: Towards an invigorated social constructionism.

Theory & Psychology, 4, 85-103.

Stokes, D. M. (1987).Theoretical parapsychology. In S. Krippner (Ed.),Advances in Parapsychological Research

#5 (pp. 77-189). Jefferson, NC: McFarland.

Swann, I. (1987). Natural ESP. The ESP Core and Its Raw Characteristics. New York: Bantam.

Talbot, M. (1991). The Holographic Universe. London: Grafton.

Thouless, R. H., & Wiesner, B. P. (1947). The psi process in normal and "paranormal" psychology. Proceeding of

the Society for Psychical Research,48, 177-196.

Tyrrell, G. N. M. (1946). The Personality of Man: New Facts and Their Significance. London: Pelican.

Ullman, M. (1984). Dream, metaphor, and psi. In R. A. White & R. S. Broughton (Eds.),Research in

Parapsychology 1983 (pp. 138-152). Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press.

Walker, E. H. (1975). Foundations of paraphysical and parapsychological phenomena. In L. Oteri (Ed.), Quantum

physics and parapsychology (pp. 1-53). New York: Parapsychology Foundation.

Wheeler, C. J. (1987). The magic of metaphor: A perspective on reality construction. Metaphor and Symbolic

Activity, 2, 223-237.

White, R. A. (1985). The spontaneous, the imaginal, and psi: Foundations for a depth parapsychology. In R. A.White & J. Solfvin (Eds.),Research in Parapsychology 1984 (pp. 166-190). Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press.

White, R. A. (1994). Exceptional human experiences: The generic connection. ASPR Newsletter, 18(3), 1-6.

Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.

Woofitt, R. (1992). Telling Tales of the Unexpected. Hemel Hempstead, England: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Zusne, L., & Jones, W. H. (1989). Anomalistic Psychology: A Study of Magical Thinking. (2nd ed.) London:

Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.


18/19

18

Psychology Department

Liverpool Hope University College

Hope Park

Liverpool

UK. L16 9JD


19/19

19

Table 1

Different Explanations Derived from the Different Metaphors

Used to Describe Various Phenomena

Phenomena Intrusions Transmissions Connections (Holistic)

ESP Mediated through

intruding spirit

Communication-like

process

Synchronicity/non-local

correlation

PK Force exerted by spirit Force transmitted by agent Observer collapse of the

wavefunction

RSPK Activity of unseen spirit Unconscious-repressed

emotional transmission of

force by an agent

Observer collapse of the

wavefunction

Apparitions Intrusion of spirit fromone domain to another

Constructed image inresponse to information

communicated

Synchronicity/non-localcorrelation

Footnote:

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 18th International Conference of the Society for Psychical

Research, Bournemouth, England, 1994. This work was completed while the author was supported by an ESRC

studentship award at the University of Edinburgh. I would like to acknowledge those who provided useful criticism

and advice during the preparation of this paper: Robert Morris, Diane Dutton, Carlos Alvarado, Tony Lawrence, and

Paul Stevens. I would also like to thank Stanley Krippner and Steve Rosen for their comments and advice when

refereeing this paper and Rhea White for her encouragement and help.

carl williams- metaphor, parapsychology and psi: an examination of metaphors related to paranormal...

Documents