cargill associates architects in philanthropy. 1. narrow focus on immediate needs 2. unengaged...

11
IN MAJOR FUNDRAISING EFFORTS Cargill Associates Architects in Philanthropy HOW TO AVOID THE 7 MOST COSTLY MISTAKES

Upload: hilary-reynolds

Post on 27-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Cargill Associates Architects in Philanthropy. 1. Narrow focus on immediate needs 2. Unengaged constituency 3. Weak Case for Support 4. Untested goals

IN MAJOR FUNDRAISING EFFORTS

Cargill AssociatesArchitects in Philanthropy

HOW TO AVOID

THE 7 MOSTCOSTLY MISTAKES

Page 2: Cargill Associates Architects in Philanthropy. 1. Narrow focus on immediate needs 2. Unengaged constituency 3. Weak Case for Support 4. Untested goals

THE SEVEN MOST COSTLY MISTAKES

1. Narrow focus on immediate needs

2. Unengaged constituency

3. Weak Case for Support

4. Untested goals and objectives

5. Failure to conduct a Feasibility Study

6. Failure to prepare a plan of action

7. Failure to consider appropriate, professional counsel

Page 3: Cargill Associates Architects in Philanthropy. 1. Narrow focus on immediate needs 2. Unengaged constituency 3. Weak Case for Support 4. Untested goals

1. NARROW FOCUS ON IMMEDIATE NEEDS

Determine the Long-Range Vision

A. Review the college’s case statement, including its history, purpose, and

record of service to the people whose lives it impacts;B. Determine the individuals/constituent groups who are responsible to

clarify the vision of the college;

C. Invite broad participation from appropriate groups to explore and construct the long-range vision; this will ensure ownership and buy in;

D. Create a partnership with these people to ensure that all involved affirm the

college’s hopes and dreams;E. Prioritize the necessary objectives which will ensure achievement of

the college’s mission and vision (hopes and dreams).

Page 4: Cargill Associates Architects in Philanthropy. 1. Narrow focus on immediate needs 2. Unengaged constituency 3. Weak Case for Support 4. Untested goals

2. UNENGAGED CONSTITUENCY

Inform and Involve Constituents

A. “Friend-raising” is an important ingredient of fundraising: A variety of events and informational meetings in the community can raise awareness and cultivate partners for the college;

B. After clearly identifying its constituents, the college must involve them by

attracting their interest, keeping them informed, and inviting their input;

C. As soon as these constituents “buy in” to the vision, their “ownership” will motivate their participation.

Page 5: Cargill Associates Architects in Philanthropy. 1. Narrow focus on immediate needs 2. Unengaged constituency 3. Weak Case for Support 4. Untested goals

3. WEAK CASE FOR SUPPORT

Develop a Compelling Case for Support

A. A compelling Case for Support establishes the investment opportunities by describing the benefits derived from each funding objective;

B. It describes the sequence, plan, and budget for each funding objective;

C. It demonstrates to potential donors that their efforts, combined with the efforts of others can achieve results far greater than would be possible alone;

D. A strong Case for Support informs, excites, and involves constituents as it describes how the stated objectives can impact the lives of those served by the college.

Page 6: Cargill Associates Architects in Philanthropy. 1. Narrow focus on immediate needs 2. Unengaged constituency 3. Weak Case for Support 4. Untested goals

4. UNTESTED GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

Test the Goals and Objectives

A. The donor base needs to be evaluated and qualified with respect to estimated gift potential over and above ongoing annual support;

B. The college needs information in order to achieve balance between its

needs and the donor’s interest and ability to provide support;

C. To gain this information, test the goals before making them public;

D. This helps ensures success of the campaign and this success enhances future efforts.

Page 7: Cargill Associates Architects in Philanthropy. 1. Narrow focus on immediate needs 2. Unengaged constituency 3. Weak Case for Support 4. Untested goals

5. FAILURE TO CONDUCT A FEASIBILITY STUDY

Conduct a Feasibility Study

A. Individuals who are a part of the donor base need to be evaluated and qualified with regards to estimating their gift potential over and above their ongoing annual support;

B. The college needs information in order to achieve balance between its

needs and the donor’s interest and ability to provide support; C. To gain this information, test the goals before making them public;

D. This ensures success of the campaign;

E. Success enhances future efforts.

Page 8: Cargill Associates Architects in Philanthropy. 1. Narrow focus on immediate needs 2. Unengaged constituency 3. Weak Case for Support 4. Untested goals

• If planned gifts are available

OVERARCHING PRINCIPLESA Feasibility Study discovers:

• Who might play the biggest giving role

• Who might play the biggest getting role

• The donor’s priorities in the college’s plan

• What tools and people are needed to implement a plan

• An attainable and challenging goal for the campaign

• Who would and could provide effective leadership

Cargill AssociatesArchitects in Philanthropy

Page 9: Cargill Associates Architects in Philanthropy. 1. Narrow focus on immediate needs 2. Unengaged constituency 3. Weak Case for Support 4. Untested goals

6. FAILURE TO PREPARE A PLAN OF ACTION

Plan the Work; Work the Plan

The Campaign Plan needs to include the following:

• The finalized Case for Support;

• Challenging but attainable goals;

• Balance between the college’s needs and donors’ resources;

• A critical path or time line that establishes target dates for the campaign• A solicitation strategy for top ten gifts and other leadership gifts;

• Enlistment of key leaders with their responsibilities clearly defined;• Recruitment and training of volunteers;

• Information meetings to present campaign to potential donors;

• A partnership with appropriate, professional counsel.

Page 10: Cargill Associates Architects in Philanthropy. 1. Narrow focus on immediate needs 2. Unengaged constituency 3. Weak Case for Support 4. Untested goals

7. FAILURE TO SELECT APPROPRIATE,

PROFESSIONAL COUNSEL

Choose Counsel Wisely

A. Investigate the reputation and track record of a potential consulting firm;B. Be sure that the consulting firm provides the necessary resources to conduct the Feasibility Study-the vital foundation for a successful campaign;C. Identify a consulting firm that has a wide variety of experiences;

D. Select a firm with a team of consultants that provides the right chemistry for your college;

E. Avoid any “cookie cutter” approaches to fundraising;

F. Appropriate counsel must be tailored to fit your needs and situation;

G. Examine the services offered by the consulting firm to be sure they are comprehensive and will add value to your investment;

H. Choose the consulting firm that will best represent your college to its valued constituents and provide direction to ensure the most successful campaign possible.

Page 11: Cargill Associates Architects in Philanthropy. 1. Narrow focus on immediate needs 2. Unengaged constituency 3. Weak Case for Support 4. Untested goals

AVOIDING THE MISTAKES BY:

1. Broadening the focus on the College’s Vision 2. Engaging the constituency

3. Preparing a Strong Case for Support

4. Testing goals and objectives

5. Conducting a Feasibility Study

6. Preparing a plan of action

7. Considering appropriate, professional counsel