cardiff face to face 18march2009 - cardiff university meetings... · rebuilding of the face...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Face to Face
Computer Simulation and
Facial Movement
March 18th, 2009
Brian Walker ArupLiliana Beldie ArupYongtao Lu Cardiff Univ.
Contents – Computer Simulation and Facial Movement
• Why FE Modelling
• Software Tools• Simpleware
• LS-DYNA
• Muscle Model
• Computer Simulations• Facial expressions before surgery
• Surgery
• Facial expressions after surgery
• Summary
2
Model of a human face – Why FE modelling?
• Maxillofacial surgery – a specialist surgical procedure involving the correction or rebuilding of the face following trauma or disease
• There are tools in place for planning the surgery – for example moulds of the upper and lower jaws are used to plan the relocation of the bones before a BimaxillaryOsteotomy – in this particular case a Le Fort I Osteotomy of the Maxilla and Sagittal Split Osteotomy of the Mandible
• Computer simulation of the surgery would provide an excellent tool for preoperative planning, allowing investigation of various possible strategies
• The FE simulation would also allow for prediction of the resulting facial appearance
Model of a human face – Why FE modelling?
• Maxillofacial surgery – a specialist surgical procedure involving the correction or rebuilding of the face following trauma or disease
• There are tools in place for planning the
surgery – for example moulds of the upper and lower jaws are used to plan the
relocation of the bones before a BimaxillaryOsteotomy – in this particular case a Le
Fort I Osteotomy of the Maxilla and Sagittal Split Osteotomy of the Mandible
• Computer simulation of the surgery would provide an excellent tool for preoperative planning, allowing investigation of various
possible strategies
• The FE simulation would also allow for prediction of the resulting facial appearance
3
Scanning
Finite Element Model (LS-DYNA)
+ScanFE
Meshing & Material Properties
+ScanCAD
CAD import &
positioning
ScanIPImageProcessing
CT, Micro-CT, MRI, Tiff, Jpg ..etc.
Software - Simpleware
LS-DYNA
SCAN
MESH
SET-UP
ANALYSE
POST-PROCESS
ScanIP
• Import in scan data – Filter and
segment to determine different objects.
+ScanFE
• Mesh the data from Scan IP
+ScanCAD
• Integration of CAD models with
image
Software – LS-DYNA®
4
Face/ Maxilla/ Mandible –CT/STL – from a specific patient
Model of a human face
Muscles – STL – from muscle database
• Data received as STL (Stereo-lithography) files
Building the FE model of the face – ScanCAD
• Reading the separate STL’s in ScanCAD and creating the masks
• Good features in ScanCAD:
• Translate/rotate functions –
sometimes the STL parts
do not come in the correct
position
• Several (three) options when converting CAD to masks depending on the type of the mask (see next slide)
5
Building the FE model of the face – ScanIP
• Create the subcutaneous fat from an existing subcutaneous mask which does not fit the face
Building the FE model of the face – ScanFE
• Good features in ScanFE:
• All the masks that contact each other will be meshed in, i.e. the connection will consist of coincidental nodes – no need to use contacts if not required by the model
6
Building the FE model of the face – Initial model
• After the model is exported from ScanFE, we need to make sure
that the attachments of the muscles reflect the anatomical
connections applying to a real person – need to undo/redo some of
the connections – used Oasys PRIMER
• We have been working with facial surgeons to create and confirm
the muscle connections of the FE model
FE simulations using LS-DYNA
• We want to run two types of analyses:
• 1. Facial expressions – model individual muscles by means of a user defined material to capture the muscle contraction
• 2. Maxillofacial osteotomy, in which the maxilla an mandible are ‘cut’
and repositioned; the muscles are non active during this simulation, modelled with standard LS-DYNA materials
7
Facial muscles - Modelling
• Muscle – non-linear, anisotropic and viscoelastic
• Hill’s three-element model proposed in 1938 still used today:
CE
PE
SEE
FMFM
vMa(t)
LM
PE = Parallell (passive) element = tendon elasticity
CE = Contractile (active) element =
freely extendible at rest but capable of shortening when activated
SEE = series elastic element =
muscle elasticity in isometric conditions – due to cross-bridges
a(t) = activation level = specifies the level of muscle stimulation as a
function of time
LM = length of muscle
vM = shortening velocity of muscle
LM
Facial muscles - Modelling
• Hill’s three-element muscle model
CESE
PE
Isometric Contraction
(constant muscle length):
- CE shortens- SE lengthens and
- PE is constant
Muscle lengthening:
- CE, SE and PE lengthen
CESE
PE
8
Facial muscles - Modelling• Diagrams from Zajac, 1989
LM
CESE
PE
C, D: When fully activated, muscle
tissue is subjected to a constant pull
(tension), it first shortens and then
stops (isotonic contraction); the length at which the shortening
terminates corresponds to the length
at which such a force can be
sustained in steady-state
An applied constant force less (or greater) than F0
M causes muscles to
shorten (or lengthen)
At vm (maximum shortening velocity)
the muscle cannot sustain any force, even when fully activated
Isometric Force-length (static - LM =const & vM =0 ):
A – 100% activated force
B – 50% activated force
Force-velocity at L0M
(dynamic):
C – 100% activated force D – 50% activated force
A, B: By definition, peak
active force F0M is developed
when fibres are at their optimal length, LM = L0
M
• The FE analysis will be run using LS-DYNA Explicit
• A user defined muscle material model (*MAT_USER_DEFINED_MATERIAL_MODELS) for LS-DYNA is defined
based on Hill’s three element model
• The FE constitutive model of the muscle is active, quasi-incompressible,
fibre-enforced and hyperelastic
• Work under development by Yongtao Lu of Cardiff University.
Facial muscles – FE Modelling
9
Muscle Tests
Examples of Muscle Tests – Symbols Used
No Muscle Activity
Active Muscle
Passive Muscle – After Active (De-activated)
Muscle Tests
Passive Tests – No Activation
Muscle extended by applied displacement
and held.
Muscle extended by applied displacement
and returned to initial length
10
Muscle Tests
Isometric Contraction
Muscle activated (Length held)
Muscle activated (Length held), followed by
deactivation (Length held).
Muscle activated (Length held), followed by deactivation (Length held), Finally one end
condition restraint release.
Muscle Tests
Activated - Elongation
Muscle activated (Length held). Muscle
extended whilst activated.
11
Computer Simulations
Passive elongation Active elongation
• Some of the validation results are shown below for the Passive
elongation and Active elongation
• There are in same cases instabilities in the user defined material
and so the material model is still under development
Temporalis
Orbicularis
Oculi
Masseter
Buccinator
Depressor Anguli Oris
Levator LabiiSuperioris AlaequeNasi (LLSAN)
Levator LabiiSuperioris
Zygomaticus
major and minor
OrbicularisOris
Depressor LabiiInferioris
Mentalis
The FE model with the muscles listed – page 1:
Risorius
12
Geniohyoid
Mylohyoid
Stylohyoid
Posterior DigastricAnterior
Digastric
Hyoid bone
The FE model with the muscles listed – page 2:
Medial Pterygoid
Lateral Pterygoid
Bones –Rigid material
Subcutaneous –Mooney-Rivlinmaterial
The FE model with materials used:
Face skin –
Mooney-Rivlin
Muscles – User defined material
Nose cartilage & eyeball – Linear elastic material
13
Muscles active in various expressions:
- Anterior digastric
- Mylohyoid
- LLSAN
- Depressor anguli oris
- Orbicularis occuli
- Zygomaticus Minor
- Zygomaticus Major
- Rizorius
- Orbicularis occuli
Muscle activated
Jaw lowering
Disgust
Smile
Expression
• LS-DYNA simulation - user defined material model for contracting muscles
• Smile – Pre-surgery
14
• LS-DYNA simulation - user defined material model for contracting muscles
• Disgust – Pre-surgery
Mandibular SagittalSplit Osteotomy
Bimaxillary osteotomy
Maxillary Le Fort I Osteotomy
15
Maxillofacial osteotomy – FE simulation
• Maxilla 5.0mm Forward & 4.0mm Up
• Mandible 8mm Rearward & 4.0mm Up
Maxillofacial osteotomy – FE simulation
• Maxilla 5.0mm Forward & 4.0mm Up
• Mandible 8mm Rearward & 4.0mm Up
16
Maxillofacial osteotomy – FE simulation
• Maxilla 5.0mm Forward & 4.0mm Up
• Mandible 8mm Rearward & 4.0mm Up
Maxillofacial osteotomy – FE simulation
• Maxilla 5.0mm Forward & 4.0mm Up
• Mandible 8mm Rearward & 4.0mm Up
17
• LS-DYNA simulation - user defined material model for contracting muscles
• Smile – Post-surgery
• LS-DYNA simulation - user defined material model for contracting muscles
• Disgust – Post-surgery
18
Maxillofacial osteotomy – Comparison FE simulation (grey) & Patient
images 6 month post surgery (green); Geomagic Qualify 7 software is
used for the comparison
Maxillofacial osteotomy – Comparison FE simulation (grey) & Patient
images 6 month post surgery (green); Geomagic Qualify 7 software is
used for the comparison
19
Model of a human face – Next steps
• Understand the function of various muscles in facial expression and speech
• Further development of muscle material model
• Improve facial model• Muscle connections
• Material data
• The aim for the future is to build patient specific FE
models and be able to assist in real facial surgery