In focus

This has created a perception to some extent that being an ESG investor (focused on environmental, social and governance issues) is becoming incompatible with being an income investor.

We don’t think that’s true. We believe there are three ways that income investors can make sure that their income is sustainable.

1. Look beyond the headline numbersOn the face of it, the equity sectors with the highest dividend yields tend to have lower sustainability scores, while those sectors with the lowest dividend yields have somewhat higher sustainability scores (Figure 1).

By ‘sustainability score’, we mean the score generated by our proprietary tool, SustainEx. It analyses and quantifies the impact that companies in the sector have on their stakeholders and the planet, going beyond companies’ financial statements and capturing both positive and negative externalities.

Utility companies, for example, are often able to pay high dividends due to having regulated assets, restricted competition and the ability to raise prices with more certainty than some other sectors. Consumer staples, meanwhile, have a consistent stream of earnings insensitive to changes in consumer tastes or fluctuations in the broader economy. However, both sectors score badly on sustainability measures – utilities for their propagation and use of non-renewable energy, and consumer staples for their profiting from habitual or addictive products like alcohol and tobacco, and the resulting impact on consumer health.

Finding decent income and maintaining a clear conscience is a growing challenge for investors.The reason is fairly straightforward: investors don’t want to invest in companies and countries that they perceive to be causing harm. It’s an ethical stance, but it’s also because those investors are questioning the prospects of certain industries. Energy and tobacco companies, for example, offer some of the highest yields on the market. Utility companies do too, and they are some of the biggest users of fossil fuels.

Marketing material for professional investors and advisers only

Can you really invest sustainably and still get a good income?April 2020

Jingjing CuiFund Manager

Lesley-Ann MorganHead of Multi-Asset Strategy

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

4.0%

4.5%

-20.0% -10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0%

Yield

Sustainability score

Utilities

Staples

Source: Schroders, as at 31 December 2019. Uses MSCI GICS sectors, and sustainability score is measured by SustainEx, our proprietary sustainability scoring model.

Figure 1: Lower yielding equity sectors tend to have higher sustainability scores

Those headline numbers mask differences between companies under the surface. Looking at those two sector examples again, Figure 2 shows that there are many companies with high yields and sustainability scores at or above zero, which means they are unlikely to have a significant negative impact on society. Indeed many utilities companies have a net positive impact on society, and many of them have high yields. The trick, then, is to be selective within sectors as well as between.

2. Take a multi-asset approachA multi-asset approach enables investors to diversify their income sources.

At the time of writing, it is possible to earn an attractive yield across the credit spectrum, emerging market bonds and in alternative assets like preferred shares, insurance-linked securities (ILS) and property (Figure 3). These assets have a different risk profile to traditional income assets like high yielding equities and government bonds. Diversification also allows investors to introduce strategies that target a better

sustainable outcome, for example thematic investments like renewable energy equities or green bonds.

But it is not only a case of diversifying between asset classes; investors also need to think about the opportunities available to generate income within asset classes.

Looking at this another way, investors typically have to take on more risk in order to generate higher yields. That’s because higher yields compensate investors for higher risk. Investors can position portfolios in portions of the market with both higher income and stronger sustainability scores by combining established risk measures with new sustainable approaches that account for risk.

A multi-asset approach also allows for a broader range of ways by which the portfolio can exhibit sustainable characteristics. We’ve talked about equities, and the same applies to credit, whereby investors lend to companies instead of buying their stock. Ultimately, those companies which have a net negative impact on society or the environment will be considered to be less sustainable than those which have a net positive impact.

Figure 2: There are lots of companies within ‘bad’ sectors that have ‘good’ sustainability scores

Source: Schroders, as at 31 December 2019. Uses MSCI GICS sectors, and sustainability score is measured by SustainEx, our proprietary sustainability scoring model.

-3 -2 -1 0 1

Yield

Sustainability score

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

Consumer staples

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

-2 -1 0 1 2

Yield

Sustainability score

Utilities

Figure 3: Income is available across asset classes, but it may be necessary to invest in more risky assets

Source: Schroders, Refinitiv, as at 31 December 2019.

Global Equities

Green bonds

EM corporates

ILS

Global propertyGlobal High

Dividend Equities

High Yield Debt

Investment Grade

US 10 Year Treasuries

EMD LocalEmerging Market Debt(EMD) USD

Preferred Shares

Convertible Bonds

Securitised Debt

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14%

Current Yield (%)

Volatility (%)

2

It gets more difficult with lending to governments, where judgement about sustainability is more subjective, but we have tools that we can use to rank countries on their sustainability characteristics. For example, we use a tool that we call the ‘country sustainability dashboard’, which gives us a first reference about where countries sit on the sustainability scale. We compare sustainability scores to bond yields for a selection of countries in Figure 4.

Sustainable investing, however, is more than just the provision and withdrawal of capital. Within equities, sustainability is better pursued through active ownership – engaging with company management for change – than through divestment. Within credit, investors lend money to a company for the management to use in sustainable projects, or withdraw the lending if they fail to prove that they’re doing so. Engaging with governments or impacting their capital base is more difficult, but collective action on the part of many investors is still possible. In any case, government bonds are often used as risk management tools rather than core income generation tools; Figure 3 showed the relatively low yields on offer.

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

10Y yield

Country sustainability score

Source: Schroders, country risk dashboard, as at 31 December 2019.

Figure 4 – Lower sustainability generally means higher government bond yield

3

3. BeflexibleA dynamic approach allows investors to protect the portfolio against valuation risk and take advantage of valuation opportunities, while also navigating the risks and opportunities that arise from business cycle uncertainty.

Starting yields are not always a good measure of future returns. In fact, a high starting yield can reflect greater risk associated with the investment (see Figure 5). It is therefore important to keep an eye on metrics such as payout ratios and dividend coverage (for equities) and interest coverage and EBITDA/debt ratios (for credit). Furthermore, given that SustainEx is forward-looking, it can help to assess the resilience of dividends. A dynamic approach allows

investors to shift away from value traps where future dividends or coupons are at risk and into the areas where attractive yields are backed by strong fundamentals.

In addition to valuation risk, income strategies are exposed to changes in the economic cycle. Equities and corporate bonds are cyclical in nature and high income segments are exposed to dividend cuts and corporate defaults. A dynamic approach allows investors to navigate the economic cycle by shifting from cyclical into defensive strategies during the slowdown or recession phase and vice versa during the recovery and expansion phase of the cycle (see Figure 6).

Figure6–Expecteddividendpayoutratiosdifferacrossregionsandvarythroughtime

Source: Schroders, as at 31 December 2019. Expectations of payout ratios are formed on the basis of historical 10-year average payout ratios for each region

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

Sep

00

Jun

01

Mar

02

Dec

02

Sep

03

Jun

04

Mar

05

Dec

05

Sep

06

Jun

07

Mar

08

Dec

08

Sep

09

Jun

10

Mar

11

Dec

11

Sep

12

Jun

13

Mar

14

Dec

14

Sep

15

Jun

16

Mar

17

Dec

17

Sep

18

Jun

19

Payout ratio

EM Europe ex UK Japan Pacific ex JP UK US

Figure 5 – The income available from different asset classes varies through time

Source: Schroders, Refinitiv, as at 31 March 2020. Data shown from 2001-2019.

4.3 5.0

7.5

21.9

3.9

9.0

2.03.6

2.0

5.5

0.5

4.9

0

5

10

15

20

25

Global equities Global high dividend equities

Global investmentgrade credit

Global high yield credit

Developed marketgovt bonds

Emerging marketgovt bonds

Yield (%)

Historical maximum

Historical minimum

4

SummaryWe believe it is possible to build a portfolio of sustainable income by: – Looking beyond the headline income and sustainability numbers and actively positioning the portfolio within and between

asset classes – Taking a multi-asset approach, to allow a greater range of tools to meet both the income and sustainability objectives of the

portfolio – Dynamically changing the positioning of the portfolio to take advantage of changing income and sustainability characteristics

available in the market at different times.

Figure 7: The sustainability ranks of equity sectors change through time

Source: Schroders, as at 31 December 2019. Uses MSCI GICS sectors, and sustainability score is measured by SustainEx, our proprietary sustainability scoring model.

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Healthcare Healthcare Healthcare Healthcare Healthcare Healthcare Healthcare Healthcare Healthcare Healthcare Healthcare

Comm. Services

Comm. Services

Comm. Services

Comm. Services

Comm. Services

Comm. Services

Comm. Services

Comm. Services

Comm. Services

Comm. Services

Comm. Services

IT IT IT IT IT IT IT IT IT IT IT

Financials Financials Financials Energy Energy Financials Financials Financials Financials Financials Financials

Energy Industrials Energy Financials Financials Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy

Real Estate Energy Industrials Industrials Industrials Industrials Cons. Discr. Industrials Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate

Industrials Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Industrials Real Estate Industrials Cons. Discr.

Cons. Discr.

Cons. Discr.

Cons. Discr.

Cons. Discr.

Cons. Discr.

Cons. Discr.

Cons. Discr. Real Estate Cons.

Discr.Cons. Discr. Industrials Industrials

Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities

Materials Materials Materials Materials Materials Materials Materials Materials Materials Materials Materials

Cons. Staples

Cons. Staples

Cons. Staples

Cons. Staples

Cons. Staples

Cons. Staples

Cons. Staples

Cons. Staples

Cons. Staples

Cons. Staples

Cons. Staples

Dynamism is valuable with respect to sustainability, too. Sector sustainability rankings stay fairly consistent most of the time, with healthcare and consumer staples comfortably the best and worst (see Figure 7). But that’s not to say that sectors can’t change

their sustainability spots. Notably, some industries and sectors transition and subsequently affect others. For example, the continued development of renewable energy, which has utility-like returns, could impact the cash flows of oil and gas.

5

Important InformationThe views and opinions contained herein are those of the authors as at the date of publication and are subject to change due to market and other conditions. Such views and opinions may not necessarily represent those expressed or reflected in other Schroders communications, strategies or funds.

This document is intended to be for information purposes only. The material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or security or to adopt any investment strategy. The information provided is not intended to constitute investment advice, an investment recommendation or investment research and does not take into account specific circumstances of any recipient. The material is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, accounting, legal or tax advice.

Information herein is believed to be reliable but Schroders does not represent or warrant its completeness or accuracy. No responsibility or liability is accepted by Schroders, its officers, employees or agents for errors of fact or opinion or for any loss arising from use of all or any part of the information in this document. No reliance should be placed on the views and

information in the document when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Schroders has no obligation to notify any recipient should any information contained herein changes or subsequently becomes inaccurate. Unless otherwise authorised by Schroders, any reproduction of all or part of the information in this document is prohibited.

Any data contained in this document has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable. Schroders has not independently verified or validated such data and it should be independently verified before further publication or use. Schroders does not represent or warrant the accuracy or completeness of any such data.

All investing involves risk including the possible loss of principal.

Third party data are owned or licensed by the data provider and may not be reproduced or extracted and used for any other purpose without the data provider’s consent. Third party data are provided without any warranties of any kind. The data provider and issuer of the document shall have no liability in connection with the third party data. www.schroders.com contains additional disclaimers which apply to the third party data.

With additional thanks to Ben Popatlal

Past performance is not a guide to future performance and may not be repeated. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amounts originally invested. Exchange rate changes may cause the value of any overseas investments to rise or fall. This document may contain “forward-looking” information, such as forecasts or projections. Please note that any such information is not a guarantee of any future performance and there is no assurance that any forecast or projection will be realised.

European Union/European Economic Area: Issued by Schroder Investment Management Limited,1 London Wall Place, London, EC2Y 5AU. Registered Number 1893220 England. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.

Note to Readers in Australia: Issued by Schroder Investment Management Australia Limited, Level 20, Angel Place, 123 Pitt Street, Sydney NSW 2000 Australia. ABN 22 000 443 274, AFSL 226473.

Note to Readers in Canada: Schroder Investment Management North America Inc., 7 Bryant Park, New York, NY 10018-3706. NRD Number 12130. Registered as a Portfolio Manager with the Ontario Securities Commission, Alberta Securities Commission, the British Columbia Securities Commission, the Manitoba Securities Commission, the Nova Scotia Securities Commission, the Saskatchewan Securities Commission and the (Quebec) Autorite des Marches Financiers.

Note to Readers in Hong Kong: Schroder Investment Management (Hong Kong) Limited, Level 33, Two Pacific Place 88 Queensway, Hong Kong. Central Entity Number (CE No.) ACJ591. Regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission.

Note to Readers in Indonesia: PT Schroder Investment Management Indonesia, Indonesia Stock Exchange Building Tower 1, 30th Floor, Jalan Jend. Sudirman Kav 52-53 Jakarta 12190 Indonesia. Registered / Company Number by Bapepam Chairman’s Decree No: KEP-04/PM/MI/1997 dated April 25, 1997 on the investment management activities and Regulated by Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (“OJK”), formerly the Capital Market and Financial Institution Supervisory Agency (“Bapepam dan LK”).

Note to Readers in Japan: Schroder Investment Management (Japan) Limited, 21st Floor, Marunouchi Trust Tower Main, 1-8-3 Marunouchi, Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo 100- 0005, Japan. Registered as a Financial Instruments Business Operator regulated by the Financial Services Agency of Japan. Kanto Local Finance Bureau (FIBO) No. 90.

Note to Readers in People’s Republic of China: Schroder Investment Management (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., RM1101 11/F Shanghai IFC Phase (HSBC Building) 8 Century Avenue, Pudong, Shanghai, China, AMAC registration NO. P1066560. Regulated by Asset Management Association of China.

Note to Readers in Singapore: Schroder Investment Management (Singapore) Ltd, 138 Market Street #23-01, CapitaGreen, Singapore 048946. Company Registration No. 199201080H. Regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

Note to Readers in South Korea: Schroders Korea Limited, 26th Floor, 136, Sejong-daero, (Taepyeongno 1-ga, Seoul Finance Center), Jung-gu, Seoul 100-768, South Korea. Registered and regulated by Financial Supervisory Service of Korea.

Note to Readers in Switzerland: Schroder Investment Management (Switzerland) AG, Central 2, CH-8001 Zürich, Postfach 1820, CH-8021 Zürich, Switzerland. Enterprise identification number (UID) CHE-101.447.114, reference number CH02039235704. Authorised and regulated by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA).

Note to Readers in Taiwan: Schroder Investment Management (Taiwan) Limited, 9F, 108, Sec.5, Hsin-Yi Road, Hsin-YI District, Taipei 11047 Taiwan, R.O.C. Registered as a Securities Investment Trust Enterprise regulated by the Securities and Futures Bureau, Financial Supervisory Commission, R.O.C.

Note to Readers in the United Arab Emirates: Schroder Investment Management Limited, 1st Floor, Gate Village Six, Dubai International Financial Centre, PO Box 506612 Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Registered Number 1893220 England. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.

432919