call failure analysis v3 0301

Upload: furqan-ahmad

Post on 07-Apr-2018

234 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/4/2019 Call Failure Analysis v3 0301

    1/23

    17/04/2012

    AIRCOM International

    toOrange

    Drive test Call Failure Analysis

  • 8/4/2019 Call Failure Analysis v3 0301

    2/23

    17/04/2012

    Presentation Outline and Status

    Pilot

    Methodology

    Net. IssuesServices

    Key

    Counters Alarms Drive DataNeighbours

    Performance

    RRC Access

    SHO

    ISHO

    RRC Stp Access

    CommonAlarms

    CommonFailures

    Analysis

    CM Service

    Test Nos

    Script bugs

    CC Disc

    Power Spikes

    HC Failures

    6650 ISHO

    RRC Active

    New

    Draft

    Complete

    Inter RNC HO

    TCH/BCH

  • 8/4/2019 Call Failure Analysis v3 0301

    3/23

    17/04/2012

    Shows how to find network problems from failures observed during adrive test from the collected log files

    Failures:

    Call Setup failure Different phases being analysed

    Dropped calls Main Reasons analysed

    This Presentation

  • 8/4/2019 Call Failure Analysis v3 0301

    4/23

    AIRCOM International 2004

    Successful Call Attempt Layer 3 Messages

  • 8/4/2019 Call Failure Analysis v3 0301

    5/23

    AIRCOM International 2004

    Before Call Attempt - 1

    Most important factor when a mobile is making an attempt is to ensurethat the signal received is adequate to make that attempt

    There should be sufficient 3G coverage (Ec/Io RSCP) in order to make a

    successful attempt (not a great Path Loss)

    Mobile sends RRC Connection Request message while the reception ofRRC Connection Setup does not take place.

    Two possibilities

    Node B (cell) doesnt receive RRC Connection Request message

    UE does not receive RRC Connection Setup message due toexcessive path loss

    The problem here is genuine coverage so it is important to make sureclosest site is transmitting properly or alternatively propose a new one

    A cell can only covera certain area

  • 8/4/2019 Call Failure Analysis v3 0301

    6/23

    AIRCOM International 2004

    Before Call Attempt - 2

    Ensure that when the call attempt is initiated, it is made to the correctcell

    Correct cell reselection in idle mode is crucial when the UE is moving

    through the 3G network

    Neighbours are important in idle mode as well so it is essential to verify thatthe correct relations have been made

    Check previous cell on which UE has camped on and verify with the scannerdata which one the new selected cell should be

    Camping to overshooting cells can cause problem

    Cell availability must also be checked (with scanner measurements) toensure that closest site is up and running

    If the closer cell is up and running thenneighbour relations must be checked (ADJSTable for Nokia RAN)

  • 8/4/2019 Call Failure Analysis v3 0301

    7/23

    AIRCOM International 2004

    Call Attempt Starts Mobile is sending RRC Connection Request message

    If the cell/RNC doesnt respond with an RRC Connection Setupmessage then the mobile will wait for a specific amount of time, andmake the request again. The total number of requests and the wait timeis specified by the network.

    This usually happens because:

    RNC is not able to receive the message due to a possible faultysynchronisation on the Iub (DAC Word/10 Mhz)

    Sleeping cell problem Service level counters can provide reasons for such failures (RRC ACC

    Fail)

    Cell can also respond with RRC Connection Reject Message whereusually the cause is congestion due to loading or high UL noise (AC)

    Commissioning file check (MHA setting)

    External interference Possible increase in Prx target Autotuning deactivated (hanging resource)

  • 8/4/2019 Call Failure Analysis v3 0301

    8/23

    AIRCOM International 2004

    Call Attempt Starts (examples)

    RRC Connection Reject

    No Response to RRCConnection Request

  • 8/4/2019 Call Failure Analysis v3 0301

    9/23

    AIRCOM International 2004

    RRC Active State

    We are in this state when RRC Connection is Active

    After that we are in the RAB setup phase

    After MM CM Service request message it is possible to receive a MM CMService reject message this would be a Core Network problem

    This is an example for a video call

  • 8/4/2019 Call Failure Analysis v3 0301

    10/23

    AIRCOM International 2004

    RRC Active State (2)

    After security procedures RAB Setup should take place

    When the hardware processing capacity of the BS is reached at a particular timethen NW will send a CC Disconnectwith reason no circuit/channel available.

    This is the most common reason for CC Disconnect

    Other reason can be failure to allocate channel on the called number (171,150)

  • 8/4/2019 Call Failure Analysis v3 0301

    11/23

    AIRCOM International 2004

    RRC Active State (2)

    Following this and the security procedures is that Radio Bearer Setup:

    Radio Bearer Setup message sent from the network takes mobile to RAB accessphase at which

    UE might fail to receive or even fail to respond this can be either UE problemor coverage problem (usually this never takes place)

    UE responds with Radio Bearer Setup complete which takes the call to RABActive phase

  • 8/4/2019 Call Failure Analysis v3 0301

    12/23

    AIRCOM International 2004

    RAB Active State

    When RAB Setup is complete then the messages recorded can be thesame as the ones in the middle of a call until the point when CCAlerting message is received on the DL (sometimes immediately

    Connect) this message makes the call setup attempt successful From the moment of the RRC Connection Request message until CC

    Alerting message usual mobility management activities and messagessuch as Measurement Report and Active Set update can beexchanged between UE and network.

    During this time there can be a drop in the radio link the same way as

    it can happen in the middle of the call (dropped call) due to lowcoverage, missing neighbours, failed SHO etc

  • 8/4/2019 Call Failure Analysis v3 0301

    13/23

    AIRCOM International 2004

    Failures due to system/other reasons - 1

    Call Setup Failures can also occur due to other reasons:

    User not responding

    In this case there is a DL CC Release message, happens whencalled mobile fails to return a page (user not responding)

    Called mobile in 2G (video calls only)

    In this case there is also a DL CC Release message with causeservice option not supported this happens when the called mobilehas made reselection to a 2G site

    Resource problem

    There can be also a CC Release message in the DL with thefollowing reasons:

    Temporary failure/resource unavailable

    These are usually Node B/RNC/MSC system problems

  • 8/4/2019 Call Failure Analysis v3 0301

    14/23

    AIRCOM International 2004

    Failures due to system/other reasons (examples)

    No user responding

    User busy

    Called UE in 2G (video)

  • 8/4/2019 Call Failure Analysis v3 0301

    15/23

    AIRCOM International 2004

    Failures due to system/other reasons - 2

    While being in the call setup phase there can also be an RRCConnection Release message but usually and if there isnt a higherlayer release here, the cause is unspecified

    For these Call Setup Failures it is important to have the traces from theRNC (Iub?) as well because it is not an easy task to identify the reasonof this problem from the DT files

    Site issues

    It is important that there is a record of the sites that seem to have repeatedproblems. These sites usually have failures on every drive that takes placearound their area. In the drive test trace these can be random drops whilecall is during the setup procedure. It is required most of the times that sitevisit takes place in order to ensure that everything is in place. This happenswhen all other sources of information (please read next slide) do not indicatea problem

  • 8/4/2019 Call Failure Analysis v3 0301

    16/23

    AIRCOM International 2004

    Addition of Neighbour

    AdequateRSCP?

    AdequateEc/Io?

    Stronger

    cell fromScanner?

    CSF

    Physical antenna

    reconfiguration, Addition ofnew site

    RRC CxSetup

    received?

    RB Setup

    received ?

    Admission

    Control?

    Check failurecause (Not radio

    related)

    Call dropduring setup?

    Dropped callprocess

    Yes

    Yes

    No

    No

    No

    Yes

    No

    Yes

    No

    No

    Yes

    Yes

    Yes

    No

    CSF Analysis Summary

    Check Node B (Configuration,Iub/10 MHz, DAC Word, CellResource counters, Alarms)

    Issue TT, Furtherinvestigation

    Check noiselevels,

    Autotuning,

    ChannelAvailability

    RRC CxReject

    received?

    AdmissionControl?

    No

    Yes Yes

    No

    Check noiselevels, Autotuning

  • 8/4/2019 Call Failure Analysis v3 0301

    17/23

    AIRCOM International 2004

    Coverage Related Dropped Calls

    Pilot RSCP

    Node Bs cannot cover indefinitely

    Excessive path loss results in poor Radio coverage levels

    UE will lose synchronisation and will not be able to sustain the call

    These issues are resolved by:

    Antenna tilt/relocation (higher mast or closer to rooftop edge)

    New Site

    On the call trace these appear usually as either sharp transitions to idlemode or after a high number of measurement reports (requesting weakcells)

  • 8/4/2019 Call Failure Analysis v3 0301

    18/23

    AIRCOM International 2004

    Coverage Related Dropped Calls

    Pilot Ec/Io

    In order for an adequate connection to take place at least one radio linkneeds to have good Signal to Noise Ratio this is expressed by the Pilot

    Ec/Io There are cases where a certain Pilot quality is not achieved due to the

    nature of WCDMA technology

    Overshooting sites (Pilot Pollution)

    Uneven Node B deployment (Pilot dominance)

    No clear dominant cell in the areadue to inter-site distance resulting

    in poor Ec/Io

    Below -16.0 (0)

    >= -16.0 to < -14.0

    >= -14.0 to < -12.0

    >= -12.0 to < -10.0

    >= -10.0 to < -8.0 (

    >= -8.0 to < -6.0 (5

    Above -6.0 (17651

  • 8/4/2019 Call Failure Analysis v3 0301

    19/23

    AIRCOM International 2004

    Handover related drop calls

    Missing neighbours can result in a failed connection

    This is the dominant cause of dropped calls in a well covered region

    Missing neighbours are easy to identify from DT log files but scannermeasurements need to be collected.

    In Ec/Io measurements from UE level appears to be decreasing verylow until dropped call takes place.

    Immediately after dropped call Ec/Io becomes much stronger due to cellreselection

    Dropped call occurshere for 3G mode UE

    Missing neighbours

  • 8/4/2019 Call Failure Analysis v3 0301

    20/23

    AIRCOM International 2004

    Handover related drop calls (system)

    It is possible for SHO to fail even when neighbour relations are present

    This can happen due to:

    Site issues (Channel elements, AC, Alarms, transmission) Iur problems (can be quite common)

    UE measured Ec/Io is appearing the same as in the case of a missingneighbour

    Dropped call occurshere

  • 8/4/2019 Call Failure Analysis v3 0301

    21/23

    AIRCOM International 2004

    Handover related drop calls (Dual mode)

    When mobile is in dual mode it is possible to handover to 2G system

    First mobile will enter compressed mode (Physical ChannelReconfiguration) so that it can measure the 2G cells

    In order to find missing 2G neighbours then the Measurement Controlmessage, after entering compressed mode has to be examined for thecorrect BCCH ARFCNs

  • 8/4/2019 Call Failure Analysis v3 0301

    22/23

    AIRCOM International 2004

    Check inter-system issues,BCCH/TCH clash

    Compressedmode?

    Adequate2G

    Coverage?

    DC

    Physical antennareconfiguration, Addition of

    new site (2G)

    No

    YesNo

    Yes

    Dropped Call Analysis Summary

    2G NeighbourList Correct?

    Yes

    No

    Add missing neighbours

    Add missing neighbours

    Strongercell fromScanner?

    Physical antennareconfiguration, Addition of

    new site

    Yes

    No

    Yes

    Active SetAdequate

    RSCP-Ec/Io?

    Yes

    No

    Strongercell in

    MonitoredSet?

    No

    Measurement Report

    Sent?

    No

    Check UE

    Site ondifferent

    RNC?

    Yes

    Check Iur

    No

    Check Node B (Configuration,Iub/10 MHz, DAC Word, Cell

    counters, Alarms)

    Yes

  • 8/4/2019 Call Failure Analysis v3 0301

    23/23

    AIRCOM International 2004

    Information needed during Analysis

    When performing call setup - or any kind of Drive test log fileanalysis the following information should be at the disposal of theengineer. It is apparent that this information must be updated as often

    as possible to ensure analysis accuracy:1. Site Availability Status

    2. RNC dump/RNC Browser Access

    3. Counter information

    4. Site configuration (MHA, WSP, ATM, DAC, etc)

    5. Reference database (ex. sites and neighbours)6. Trouble ticket and maintenance Status

    7. Integration plan

    8. Drive test team report, comments and observations