caam82n6 finite elements in the analysis of pressure vessels and piping

Review

Finite elements in the analysis of pressure vessels and piping,

an addendum: A bibliography (2001–2004)

Jaroslav Mackerle*

Linkoping Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, S-581 83 Linkoping, Sweden

Received 30 November 2004; revised 13 December 2004; accepted 31 December 2004

Abstract

The paper gives a bibliographical review of finite element methods(FEMs) applied for the analysis of pressure vessel

structures/components and piping from the theoretical as well as practical points of view. This bibliography is a new addendum to the

Finite elements in the analysis of pressure vessels and piping—a bibliography [1–3]. The listings at the end of the paper contain 856

references to papers and conference proceedings on the subject that were published in 2001–2004. These are classified in the following

categories: linear and nonlinear, static and dynamic, stress and deflection analyses; stability problems; thermal problems; fracture mechanics

problems; contact problems; fluid–structure interaction problems; manufacturing of pipes and tubes; welded pipes and pressure vessel

components; development of special finite elements for pressure vessels and pipes; finite element software; and other topics.

q 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Finite element; Bibliography; Pressure vessels; pipes; Linear and nonlinear static and dynamic analysis; Fracture mechanics; Contact problems;

Thermal problems; Fluid–structure interaction; Welding

1. Introduction

Pressure vessels and piping are widely used in reactor

technology, the chemical industry, marine and space

engineering. They often operate under extremes of high

and low temperatures and high pressures, are becoming

highly sophisticated and therefore also need advanced

methods for their analyses. Advances are also made with

materials applied for their fabrication. Concrete and

composite materials are used more frequently in pressure

vessels and their components to replace, in some cases,

conventional steels.

During the last three decades considerable advances have

been made in the applications of numerical techniques to

analyze pressure vessel and piping problems. Among the

numerical procedures, finite element methods are the most

frequently used.

Pressure vessel and piping analyses may have a variety of

phases such as: elastic stress and deformation analysis

0308-0161/$ - see front matter q 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

doi:10.1016/j.ijpvp.2004.12.004

* Corresponding author. Tel.: C46 13 281 111; fax: C46 13 282 717.

E-mail address: [email protected]

where both mechanical and thermal loads may be applied;

heat transfer analysis; dynamic analysis; plastic and creep

analysis; etc. There is in existence a large number of general

purpose and special purpose finite element programs

available to cope with each phase of the analysis.

This review on the subject is divided into the following

parts and it concerns:

†
linear and nonlinear, static and dynamic, stress and
deflection analyses (STR)

†
stability problems (STA)
†
thermal problems (THE)
†
fracture mechanics problems (FRA)
†
contact problems (CON)
†
fluid–structure interaction problems (FLU)
†
manufacturing of pipes and tubes (MAN)
†
welded pipes and pressure vessel components (WEL)
†
development of special finite elements for pressure
vessels and pipes (ELE)

†
finite element software (SOF)
†
other topics (OTH)
The status of finite element literature published between

1976 and 2004, and divided into the categories described

above, is illustrated in Fig. 1. Data presented in this figure

International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 82 (2005) 571–592

www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpvp

http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpvp

Fig. 1. Finite elements and various topics in pressure vessels and piping

(1976–2004).

J. Mackerle / International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 82 (2005) 571–592572

include published technical papers in the primary literature;

this means papers appearing in the various general and

specialized journals, conference proceedings as well as

theses and dissertations. If we take the number of published

papers as a measure of research activity in these various

subjects, we can see the priority trend in research.

This paper is organized into two parts. In the first, each

subject listed above is briefly described by keywords where

current trends in application of finite element techniques are

mentioned. The second part, Appendix A, is a listing of

references on papers published in the open literature for the

period 2001–2004, retrieved from the author’s database

MAKEBASE [4,5]. Readers interested in the finite element

literature in general are referred to [6] or to the author’s

Internet Finite Element Book Bibliography(http://www.

solid.ikp.liu.se/fe/index.html). The presented bibliography

is an addendum to the author’s earlier bibliographies [1–3].

Also the bibliography on creep and creep fracture/damage

finite element modelling [7] may be of interest.

2. Finite elements in the analysis of pressure vessels

and piping

2.1. Linear and nonlinear, static and dynamic,

stress and deflection analyses (STR)

The main topics included deal with the static and

dynamic finite element analyses of pressure vessels, their

components and piping, namely: stress and deformation

analysis; 2D and 3D linear elastic static and dynamic

analysis; material and geometrical nonlinear static and

dynamic analysis; seismic response analysis; impact

analysis; response to detonation loading; damping charac-

teristics; analysis of residual stresses; shakedown analysis;

vibroacoustical analysis; mechanical behaviour studies;

local mechanical behaviour studies; determining plastic

and limit loads; stress concentration factors; stiffness

evaluation; wrinkling; probabilistic studies.

Applications to: pipes; tubes; pipelines; tubesheets;

piping elbows; pressure vessel components; containment

vessels; pressure vessel heads; reactor vessel heads; nozzle

models; thick-walled cylinders; reinforcing pads; tubular

structures; saddle supports; anchorage.

Materials under consideration: steels; stainless steels;

aluminium; composites; polymers; filament wound compo-

sites; fibre-reinforced composites; polymer matrix compo-

sites; titanium; foam filled aluminum tubes; steel reinforced

plastics; structural foams.

2.2. Stability problems(STA)

Stability problems are the main subject of this section

Other topics included are: static and dynamic buckling;

thermal buckling; inelastic buckling pressure; inelastic local

buckling; buckling response to seismic loading; creep-

induced buckling; critical, buckling strains; buckling of

cracked components; post-buckling analysis; buckle propa-

gation; bending instabilities; stability for cone–cylinder

intersections.

Applications to: pipes; tubes; pipelines; linepipes; reeled

pipe-in-pipe; pressure vessel components.

Materials: steels; low-alloy steels; aluminium; compo-

sites; titanium.

2.3. Thermal problems (THE)

Heat transfer problems and thermomechanical finite

element analyses are the main subjects of this section. The

following topics are also included: thermal loading and

temperature cycling; temperature attenuation; thermal

shock; pressurized thermal shock; heat transfer analysis;

convective heat and mass transfer; turbulent forced

convection and thermal radiation; thermal stratification;

thermal striping; freezing problems; creep; local creep;

high-temperature structural integrity procedures; design for

elevated temperature service; thermal fatigue; fire perform-

ance; thermal management studies; parametric studies.

Applications to: pipes; tubes; pipelines; boiler tubes;

banks of tubes; tube coolant piping systems; tube condenser;

pressure vessels; reactor pressure vessels; cryogenic press-

ure vessels; heat exchanger components; heated sterilizers;

tube–fin exchangers; bellows; tanks; valves; subsea

flowlines.

Materials: steels; concrete; composites; polymers; cer-

amics; thermal insulations.

2.4. Fracture mechanics problems(FRA)

In this section fracture mechanics and fatigue problems

are handled. The listing of references in the Appendix

includes: linear and nonlinear 2D and 3D static and dynamic

fracture mechanics problems; mechanical and thermal

loading; macromechanical and micromechanical modelling;

global/local analysis; crack tip opening; crack growth and

propagation; delamination growth; crack arrest behaviour;

stress corrosion cracks; multiple cracks; microcracking;

fracture toughness; strength; shear strength; cleavage

fracture; burst pressure prediction; predicting the failure

pressure; prediction of crack coalescence; progressive

http://www.solid.ikp.liu.se/fe/index.html

http://www.solid.ikp.liu.se/fe/index.html

J. Mackerle / International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 82 (2005) 571–592 573

crushing; limit load solutions; fracture mechanics par-

ameters; stress intensity factors; J-integral; damage; damage

tolerance; progressive damage; interlaminar and intralami-

nar damage; fatigue problems; thermal fatigue; creep

rupture; tearing failure; local failure modes; leak-before-

break analysis; failure models for puncture; critical fracture

energy; flow induced vibration failure; load capacity of

corroded pipes; waveguide scattering by cracks; material

fracture testing; NDT; flaw detection; pipe inspection;

defect assessment at elevated temperature; fracture mech-

anics in material processing; fracture mechanics in welding;

life assessment; benchmark experiments; integrity evalu-

ation methods; reliability analysis.

Applications to: pipes; tubes; pipelines; elbows; line-

pipes; pipe bends; pressure vessels; reactor pressure vessels;

heat exchangers; power plant components; tube-to-tube-

sheets; pressurized cylinders; deep-water pipelines; branch

junctions; dents; perforated plates; drainage systems.

Materials: steels; stainless steels; aluminium; titanium;

composites; braided composites; sandwich composites;

polymers; rubber; cladding materials; foam fillings.

2.5. Contact problems(CON)

2D and 3D finite element studies of static and dynamic

contact problems dealing with pipes and pressure vessels are

included in this section. Other subjects under consideration

are: behaviour of joints to static, dynamic and thermal

loading; junctions under pressure and bending; creep

induced contact and stress evolution; contact pressure due

to thermal loading; stress concentration factor; lateral

contact stiffness; flexibility analysis; external flange loads;

moment resistance; estimation of sealing performance; bolt-

up and disassembly process; stick-slip and stick-slip-

separation; study of gaps between components.

Applications to: pipes; tubes; pressure vessels; pipe

flange connections; gasketed and non-gasketed flanged

pipes; flanged connections for high-temperature appli-

cations; piping branch junctions; tube-to-tubesheet joints;

tube–gusset plate connections; stub–flange joints; shear

joining; lapped shear joints; bolted flanged joints; tubesheet-

to-channel connections; nozzle–shell junctions; nozzle–

sphere connections; ferrule strap connections; bonded

connections; joining by curing.

Materials: steels; stainless steels; aluminium; polymers;

composites; concrete.

2.6. Fluid–structure interaction problems (FLU)

The main topics include: coupled fluid–structure

response analyses; fluid induced vibration problems;

dynamic analysis of fluid-filled pipes; analysis of pipes

conveying fluids; radial–axial deformations of pipes con-

veying fluid; instability analysis in shells conveying

fluid; modal vibration suppression; wave–seabed–pipe

interaction.

Applications to: pipes; tubes; pipelines; pressure vessels;

tube bundles; submerged pipes.

Materials: steels; composites; fluids.

2.7. Manufacturing of pipes and tubes(MAN)

The finite element simulation of manufacturing pro-

cesses is the subject of this section. The main topics listed

are: material characteristics and formability; determination

of the coefficient of friction; determination of forming limit;

study of forming parameters; flow stress determination;

bending problems; cold bending; laser tube bending; bulge

forming; hydrostatic tube bulging; electromagnetic bulging;

drawing; cold drawing; bend-stretching forming; tubular

hydroforming; dual hydroforming; planetary rolling; hot

roll sizing milling; roller levelling; rotationally molding;

extrusion; semi-solid extrusion; tube flaring; tube-nosing

process; outward curling; cold pilgering; casting; necking

and bursting; fold formation; lubrication mechanisms;

fixtures design.

Applications to manufacturing of: pipes; tubes; line-

pipes; pipelines; seamless tubes; T-shape tubes; elbows;

bellows; pressure vessels.

Materials: steels; stainless steels; microalloyed steels;

aluminium; titanium; zircaloy; steel reinforced plastics;

polymers; composites.

2.8. Welded pipes and pressure vessel components(WEL)

The subjects in the simulation of welding processes

included here are: 2D and 3D thermomechanical analysis;

heat transfer analysis; residual stresses caused by welding;

temperature distribution; determination of welding pressure;

prediction of welding parameters; creep behaviour of welds;

local stress effect; fracture behaviour of welds; weld fatigue;

life prediction; weld testing; structural integrity assessment.

Welding of: pipes; tubes; gas pipelines; pressure vessel

components; pressure vessels; tubesheet assembly; long

seam welds; girth welds; butt welds; friction welding;

ultrasonic welding; multi-pass welding; prepregs welding;

sleeve repair welding.

Materials: steels; stainless steels; austenitic steels;

polymers.

2.9. Development of special finite elements

for pressure vessels and pipes(ELE)

In this section, references dealing with development as

well as applications of special finite elements used for

analyses of pressure vessels and piping systems are given.

The element types included are: modelling experiences with

various types of elements; pipe and tube elements; contact

elements; elbow elements; shell elements; toroidal shells;

shell elements for collapse load analysis; elements for

generalized in-plane pipe loading; 3D elements for saddle

support pressure vessels; special element for the study of


drag chains; special tube element for thermomechanical

analysis; exact Timoshenko pipe element.

2.10. Finite element software (SOF)

At present, thousands of finite element software packages

exist and new programs are under development. The existing

software can vary from large, sophisticated, general purpose,

integrated systems to small, special purpose programs for

PCs. Most of these programs have been mentioned and

described in [1,8]. In the respective section of the Appendix

some new references dealing with development/applications

of FE software are listed. They are concerned with: code

for prestressed concrete containment vessels; code for

thermal-hydraulics pressurized thermal shock analysis;

new pressure vessel code for ASME; software for lifetime

assessment; software for offshore pipelines; finite element

parallel processing; distributed computation.

2.11. Other topics(OTH)

In this last section subjects not treated earlier are

included. They deal with: static and dynamic geomechani-

cal analyses of pressure vessels and pipes in 2D and 3D;

buried structures; soil–structure interaction; side and deep

excavations; laying operations; deflection analysis; surface

impact; pipelines subject to settlement; buried pipes under

vehicle loads; cyclone effects; pipes in sediment pocket;

seismic analysis; noise transmission; deployment dynamics

of inflatable tubes.

Applications to: pipes; tubes; submarine pipelines;

pipelines with elbows; pumping well pipes; perforated

drainage pipes; perforated stiffening tubes; sandwich pipes;

pipe-in-pipe; pipe culverts; water piping systems; tunnel

face reinforced with pipes; microtunneling applications;

nuclear fuel channels; check valves; servovalves; catenary

risers; anchorage; relaxed hanger spans.

Materials: steels; stainless steels; concrete; polymers;

composites; thermoplastics; geotextile; inflated fabrics.

Acknowledgements

The bibliography presented in the Appendix is by no

means complete but it gives a comprehensive representation

of different finite element applications on the subject. The

author wishes to apologize for the unintentional exclusions

of missing references and would appreciate receiving

comments and pointers to other relevant literature for a

future update.

Appendix A. A bibliography (2001–2004)

This bibliography provides a list of literature references

on finite element analysis of pressure vessel structures/

components and pipes/tubes. The listings presented contain

papers published in scientific journals and conference

proceedings retrospectively to 2001. References have been

retrieved from the author’s database, MAKEBASE. Also

COMPENDEX has been checked. References are grouped

into the same sections described in the first part of this

paper, and are sorted alphabetically according to the first

author’s name. In some cases, if a specific paper is relevant

to several subject categories, the same reference is listed

under the respective section headings.

A.1. Linear and nonlinear, static and dynamic,

stress and deflection analyses

1. Abdel-Haq MM. Constraint effects on energy absorption in

unidirectional polymeric composite PMC tubes. PhD Thesis,

Wayne State Univ, 2002.

2. Asada S, et al. Verification of alternative criteria for shakedown

evaluation using flat head vessel. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP

2002;439:17–22.

3. Asada S, et al. Verification of alternative criteria for shakedown

evaluation using 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional nozzle models.

ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;439:23–30.

4. Ayob AB, et al. The interaction of pressure, in-plane moment and

torque loadings on piping elbows. Int J Press Vess Piping 2003;

80(12):861–9.

5. Beltman WM, Shepherd JE. Linear elastic response of tubes to

internal detonation loading. J Sound Vib 2002;252(4):617–55.

6. Bjorset A, et al. Titanium pipes subjected to bending moment and

external pressure. Int Conf Offshore Mech Arctic Engng, Rio de

Janeiro. New York: ASME 2001;33–41.

7. Bjorset A, et al. Titanium pipes subjected to bending moment and

external pressure. Comput Struct 2003;81(30):2691–704.

8. Bjorset A, et al. Probabilistic analysis of bending moment capacity of

titanium pipes. Struct Safety 2004;26(3):241–69.

9. Blyukher B, et al. Computer simulation of pipeline deformations on

the basis of data from an intelligent caliper inspection tool. ASME

Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2003;458:309–12.

10. Boot JC, et al. Predicting the creep lives of thin-walled cylindrical

polymeric pipe linings subject to external pressure. Int J Solids Struct

2003;40(26):7299–314.

11. Borvik T, et al. Empty foam-filled aluminium tubes subjected to

axial and oblique quasistatic loading. Int J Crashworth 2003;8(5):

481–94.

12. Caillaud S, et al. Aeroacoustical coupling and its structural effects on

a PWR steam line Part 2-Vibroacoustical analysis of pipe shell

deformations. ASME Int Mech Engng Cong Expo, AMD 2002;253:

843–50.

13. Chapuliot S, et al. Mechanical behavior of a branch pipe subjected to

out-of-plane bending load. J Press Vess Tech, ASME 2002;124(1):

7–13.

14. Chattopadhyay J. The effect of internal pressure on in-plane collapse

moment of elbows. Nuclear Engng Des 2002;212(1/3):133–44.

15. De Sousa JRM, et al. Local mechanical behaviour of flexible pipes

subjected to installation loads. Int Conf Offshore Mech Arctic Engng,

Rio de Janeiro. New York: ASME 2001;219–27.

16. Demma A, et al. Mode conversion of longitudinal and torsional

guided modes due to pipe bends. AIP Conf, No. 557A 2001;172–9.

17. Dixon RD, et al. Stress concentration factors of cross-bores in thick

walled cylinders and square blocks. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf,

PVP 2002;436:31–6.

18. Duffey TA, Romero C. Vibration modes of spherical shells and

containment vessels. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;440:

177–84.


19. Estrada H. Axisymmetric analysis of a laminated cylindrical shell

with variable thickness. Int SAMPE Tech Conf, Long Beach

2004;2589–98.

20. Ezekoye LI. An examination of the effect of valve design on stifffiess.


21. Famiyesin OOR, et al. Post-finite-element prediction strategies for

engineering structures. J Struct Engng, ASCE 2001;127(11):1366–9.

22. Famiyesin OOR, et al. Semi-empirical equations for pipeline design

by the finite element method. Comput Struct 2002;80(16):1369–82.

23. Florizone DJ. Design of ellipsoidal heads using elastic–plastic finite

element analysis. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;440:

163–70.

24. Franco JRQ, et al. Adaptive FE method for the shakedown and limit

analysis of pressure vessels. Eur J Mech, A/Solids 2003;22(4):

525–33.

25. Fujita K, et al. Seismic response analysis of piping systems with

nonlinear supports using differential algebraic equations. ASME Press

Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2001;428:57–65.

26. Fujiwaka T, et al. Simulation of excessive deformation of piping due

to seismic and weight loads. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP

2002;439:345–52.

27. Fukuda N, et al. Changes in tensile properties due to cold bending of

line pipes. Int Conf Offshore Mech Arctic Engng, Oslo. New York:

ASME 2002;189–96.

28. Fukuda N, et al. Effect of changes in tensile properties due to cold

bending on large deformation behavior of high-grade cold bend pipe.

4th Int Conf Offshore Mech Arctic Engng, Oslo. New York: ASME

2002;363–70.

29. Guillot MW, Helms JE. Comparison of different methodologies for

stress analysis of reinforcing pads. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf,

PVP 2003;459:75–9.

30. Gupta NK, et al. A study of lateral collapse of square and rectangular

metallic tubes. Thin-Wall Struct 2001;39(9):745–72.

31. Haapaniemi H, et al. Numerical simulation of piping vibrations using

an updated FE model. Proc SPIE 2002;4753:193–9.

32. Hardy SJ, et al. Upper lower bound limit and shakedown loads for

hollow tubes with axisymmetric internal projections under axial

loading. J Strain Anal Engng Des 2001;36(6):595–604.

33. Hardy SJ, et al. Elastic and elastic–plastic finite element analysis of

hollow tubes with axisymmetric internal projections under com-

bined axial and pressure load. J Strain Anal Engng Des 2001;36(4):

373–90.

34. Hart JD, et al. Development of acceptance criteria for mild ripples

in pipeline field bends. 4th Int Pipeline Conf, Calgary. New York:

ASME 2002;659–72.

35. Hsieh MF, et al. Limit loads for knuckle-encroaching nozzles in

torispherical heads: experimental verification of finite element

predictions. J Strain Anal Engng Des 2002;37(4):313–26.

36. Hsu PW. Stresses in a uniformly paralelepiped solid with a

pressurized cylindrical cavity. 42nd Str Str Dyn Mater Conf, Seattle.

Washington, DC: AIAA 2001;2947–50.

37. Hub NS, et al. Effect of nozzle geometry on leak-before-break

analysis of pressurised piping. Engng Fract Mech 2001;68(16):

1709–22.

38. Kumar IS. Application of code case N-597 for local thinning

assessment for Class 1 piping. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP

2002;440:93–101.

39. Joshi B, et al. Finite element modeling of a PE pipe heap leachate

collection system. Finite Elem Anal Des 2001;37(12):979–96.

40. Kalnins A. Guidelines for sizing of vessels by limit analysis. Weld

Res Counc Bull; No. 464 2001;464:1–16.

41. Kalnins A. Shakedown check for pressure vessels using plastic FEA.


42. Kalnins A. Shakedown ratchetting directives of ASME B and PV

code and their execution. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;

439:47–55.

43. Karadeniz H. A method for including ovalization effects of tubular

member on cross-section properties. Int Offshore Polar Engng Conf,

Stavanger 2001;426–32.

44. Kim YJ, et al. Estimation of non-linear deflection for cylinder under

bending and its application to CANDU pressure tube integrity

assessment. Nuclear Engng Des 2003;223(3):255–62.

45. Kochekseraii SB. Finite element modelling of plastic collapse of

metallic single mitred pipe bends subject to in-plane bending

moments. Int J Press Vess Piping 2004;81(1):75–81.

46. Kochekseraii SB, Robinson M. Flexural behavior of a polyvinyl

chloride-lined glass-reinforced plastic composite multi-mitred pipe

bend subjected to combined loads. J Strain Anal Engng Des 2004;

39(2):137–46.

47. Krieg R, et al. Load carrying capacity of a reactor vessel head under

molten core slug impact. Nuclear Engng Des 2003;223(3):237–53.

48. Kulikov YA, et al. Numerical–experimental investigation of the

elastic deformation of a polymeric pipeline under impact. J Appl

Mech Tech Phys 2001;42(2):294–9.

49. Kumar R, Saleem MA. Bend angle effect on B2 and C2 stress indices

for piping elbows. J Press Vess Tech, ASME 2001;123(2):226–31.

50. Kumar R, Saleem MA. B2 and C2 stress indices for large angle bends.


51. Kumar R, Saleem MA. B2 and C2 stress indices for large-angle bends.

J Press Vess Tech, ASME 2002;124(2):177–86.

52. Laszlo JL, et al. Non-linear vibrations of the tube bend region of

a PWR steam generator: an experimental and numerical approach.


53. Leila K, et al. Application of the simplified analysis to real structures.

ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;446(2):181–7.

54. Leishear RA. Dynamic pipe stresses during water hammer: II—a

vibration analysis. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;440:

113–9.

55. Leishear RA, et al. Dynamic pipe stresses during water hammer: I—a

finite element approach. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;

440:75–81.

56. Lengsfeld M, et al. Analysis of loads for nozzles in API 650 tanks.


57. Lengsfeld M, et al. Stiffness coefficients for nozzles in API 650 tanks.


58. STR, Lin CY. Analysis of laminated composite tubular structure. PhD

Thesis, The Univ of Texas 2002, Arlington.

59. Lin CY, Chan WS. Stiffness evaluation of elliptical laminated

composite tube under bending. 42nd Str Str Dyn Mater Conf, Seattle.


60. Lubis A, Boyle JT. The pressure reduction effect in smooth piping

elbows—revisited. Int J Press Vess Piping 2004;81(2):119–25.

61. Madureira L, Melo FQ. Stress analysis of curved pipes with a hybrid

formulation. Int J Press Vess Piping 2004;81(3):243–9.

62. Magnucki K, et al. Flexible saddle support of a horizontal cylindrical

pressure vessel. Int J Press Vess Piping 2003;80(3):205–10.

63. Maher A, Hamada AA. On the modelling of tubes with composite

coat. IMAC-XIX, Kissimmee, FL 2001;782–9.

64. Mangalaramanan P. Accelerated limit loads using repeated elastic

finite element analyses. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2003;

458:61–72.

65. Mantena PR, Mann R. Impact dynamic response of high-density

structural foams used as filler inside circular steel tube. Compos Struct

2003;61(4):291–302.

66. Marie S, Nedelec M. Elastic stresses in elbows submitted to in-

plane bending moment. J Press Vess Tech, ASME 2003;125(2):

209–20.

67. Matzen VC, Tan Y. The history of the B2 stress index. J Press Vess

Tech, ASME 2002;124(2):168–76.

68. Matzen VC, Tan Y. Using finite element analysis to determine piping

elbow bending moment B2 stress indices. Weld Res Counc Bull 2002;

472:49.


69. Megahed MM, et al. Shakedown loads for structures with severe

geometrical discontinuities. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP

2001;430:59–66.

70. Mihaylova E, et al. Dynamic ESPI measurements for mechanical

characterization of pipes. Proc SPIE 2003;5226:214–8.

71. Mihaylova E, et al. Mechanical characterization of unplasticised

polyvinylchloride thick pipes by optical methods. Opt Lasers Engng

2004;41(6):889–900.

72. Miller GA, et al. An elastic-perfectly plastic limit load analysis of a

nozzle in a monobloc vessel with external loads. ASME Press Vess

Piping Conf, PVP 2001;418:39–46.

73. Mirza S, et al. Fiber-reinforced composite cylindrical vessel with

lugs. Compos Struct 2001;53(2):143–51.

74. Moffat DG, et al. An assessment of ASME III and CEN TC54

methods of determining plastic and limit loads for pressure system

components. J Strain Anal Engng Des 2001;36(3):301–12.

75. Mourad HM, Younan MYA. Nonlinear analysis of pipe bends

subjected to out-of-plane moment loading and internal pressure.


76. Mukaimachi N, et al. An advanced computational method for

nonlinear behavior of piping systems subject to earthquake load.

ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;445(1):119–26.

77. Muscat M, Hamilton R. Elastic shakedown in pressure vessel

components under non-proportional loading. ASME Press Vess

Piping Conf, PVP 447. New York: ASME 2002;95–102.

78. Muscat M, Mackenzie D. Elastic shakedown analysis of

axisymmetric nozzles. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2001;

430:353–60.

79. Muscat M, Mackenzie D. Elastic-shakedown analysis of axisym-

metric nozzles. J Press Vess Tech, ASME 2003;125(4):365–70.

80. Ng RKH, et al. Design analysis, manufacture, and test of shallow

water pressure vessels using E-glass/epoxy woven composite

material for an underwater vehicle. J Compos Mater 2002;36(21):

2443–78.

81. Nishiguchi I, et al. Analytical numerical evaluation of the cyclic yield

area criteria for shakedown requirements. ASME Press Vess Piping

Conf, PVP 2002;439:39–46.

82. O’Brien BJ, et al. Three dimensional finite displacements and

rotations of flexible beams including non-equal bending stiffnesses.

Int Conf Offshore Mech Arctic Engng, Cancun. New York: ASME

2003;567–74.

83. Ochoa OO, Rodriguez DE. Flexure behavior of composite spoolable

tubes. Int Conf Offshore Mech Arctic Engng, Oslo. New York: ASME

2002;233–7.

84. Okamoto A, et al. Recent advancement on the draft of alternative

stress evaluation criteria in Japan based on partial inelastic analyses.


85. Okamoto A, et al. Evaluation criteria for alternating loads based on

partial inelastic analyses. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;

439:57–64.

86. Osadchuk VA, Banakhevych YV. Stress concentration in a pipeline

with surface hollow in the form of a semiellipsoid of revolution.

Mater Sci 2002;38(2):198–206.

87. Otani A, et al. The damping characteristics of piping with plastic

deformation. Part 2.. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2001;428:

21–9.

88. Park J, et al. Identification of reactor internals vibration modes of a

Korean standard of PWR using structural modeling and neutron noise

analysis. Progr Nucl Energy 2003;43(1/4):177–86.

89. Pasqualino IP, et al. Comparative structural analyses between

sandwich and steel pipelines for ultra-deep water. Int Conf Offshore

Mech Arctic Engng, Oslo. New York: ASME 2002;165–73.

90. Peek R. Wrinkling of tubes in bending from finite strain three-

dimensional continuum theory. Int J Solids Struct 2002;39(3):

709–23.

91. Peters DT. Effect of blend radius on stress concentration factor of

crossbored holes in thick walled pressure vessels. ASME Press Vess


92. Petrovic A. Stress analysis in cylindrical pressure vessels with loads

applied to the free end of a nozzle. Int J Press Vess Piping 2001;78(7):

485–93.

93. Porter MA, et al. Comparison of limit load, linear and nonlinear FE

analysis of a typical vessel nozzle. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf,

PVP 2001;430:139–44.

94. Rajan, et al. Collapse analysis of thin walled pressure vessels using

the finite element method. J Inst Engng(India) Aerospace Engng J

2001;82(1):23–8.

95. Reinhardt W. Design method for perforated plates with triangular

perforation pattern. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2001;417:

79–89.

96. Reinhardt W. A non-cyclic method for plastic shakedown analysis.


97. Reinhardt WD. Yield criteria for the elastic–plastic design of

tubesheet with triangular penetration pattern. J Press Vess Tech,

ASME 2001;123(1):118–23.

98. Rilo NF, et al. Stresses from radial loads and external moments in

spherical pressure vessels. Proc, Inst Mech Engng, Part E 2001;

215(2):99–109.

99. Salley L, Pan J. A study of the modal characteristics of curved pipes.

Appl Acoustics 2002;63(2):189–202.

100. Sang ZF, et al. Limit burst pressures for a cylindrical shell intersection

with intermediate diameter ratio. Int J Press Vess Piping 2002;79(5):

341–9.

101. Scott CS, Kozluk MJ. A finite element analysis of the residual stresses

incurred during bending of pipes. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf,

PVP 2002;441:63–70.

102. Seipp TG. Comparison of methods to evaluate finite element results

for an atypical vessel nozzle. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP

2001;430:21–5.

103. Shim DJ, et al. Assessment of local wall thinned pipeline under

combined bending and pressure. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP

2002;442:125–30.

104. Shu DW. A tube under transverse loading—FEM and experiment.

Key Engng Mater 2002;233–236:731–6.

105. Shu JJ. A finite element model and electronic analogue of pipeline

pressure transients with frequency-dependent friction. J Fluids Engng,

ASME 2003;125(1):194–9.

106. Staat M. Some achievements of the European project LISA for FEM

based limit and shakedown analysis. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf,

PVP 2002;441:177–85.

107. Sun H, et al. Finite element analysis of the steel reinforced plastic

pipe. J Mater Sci Technol 2003;19:43–5.

108. Tan Y. Experimental and nonlinear FEA investigation of elbows

leading to a new definition of the B(2) stress index. PhD Thesis, North

Carolina State Univ 2001.

109. Tan Y, Matzen V. Correlation of in-plane bending test and FEA

results for thin-walled elbows. Nuclear Engng Des 2002;217(1/2):

21–39.

110. Tan Y, et al. Correlation of test and FEA results for elbows

subjected to out-of-plane loading. Nuclear Engng Des 2002;217(3):

213–24.

111. Tan Y, et al. Correlation of test and FEA results for the nonlinear

behavior of straight pipes and elbows. J Press Vess Tech, ASME

2002;124(4):465–75.

112. Ten Horn CHLJ, Bakker A. Applicability of the fraction model to

cyclic plastic deformation of pipeline steel. Comp Mater Sci 2002;

25(1/2):246–52.

113. Wang S, Zhao J. Deformation relaxation: a finite element optimiz-

ation method for tee. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 469. New

York: ASME 2003;63–8.

114. Wang X, et al. Self-strengthening research of fiber reinforced pressure

vessel with metalic liners. J Reinf Plast Compos 2001;20(16):1390–413.


115. Webb DC, et al. Finite element simulation of energy absorption

devices under axial static compressive and impact loading. Int

J Crashworth 2001;6(3):399–423.

116. Williams DK. Shock tube treatment of high pressure discharge of

pipe blockage. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2001;430:27–33.

117. Williams DK. Axisymmetric closed form solution of pipe strap

anchors. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2001;430:51–8.

118. Williams DK. A proposed design criterion for vessel lifting lugs in

lieu of ASME B30.20. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;

440:205–12.

119. Williams DK. Predictions of residual stresses in the mechanical roll of

HX tubes into TEMA grooves. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP

2003;459:121–9.

120. Williams DK, Ranson WF. Pipe-anchor discontinuity analysis

utilizing power series solutions, Bessel Functions, and Fourier series.

Nuclear Engng Des 2003;220(1):1–10.

121. Yang J, Gurdal R. Piping elbow cyclic analyses for shakedown

verification. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 453 New York:

ASME 2003;49–59.

122. Yatabe H, et al. Effects of mechanical properties on the deformability

of high grade linepipe. Int Conf Offshore Mech Arctic Engng, Rio de


123. Yatabe H, et al. Analytical study of appropriate design for the

high-grade induction bend pipes subjected to large ground defor-

mation. Int Conf Offshore Mech Arctic Engng, Oslo. New York:

ASME 2002;181–8.

124. Yatabe H, et al. Effect of material stress–strain behavior and pipe

geometry on the deformability of high-grade pipelines. J Offshore

Mech Arctic Engng, ASME 2004;126(1):113–9.

125. Yazdchi M, Crisfield MA. Non-linear dynamic behaviour of

flexible marine pipes and risers. Int J Num Meth Engng 2002;54(9):

1265–308.

126. Yokoyama T. Finite element computation of torsional plastic waves

in a thin-walled tube. Arch Appl Mech 2001;71(6/7):359–70.

127. Zhang L, et al. Evaluation of local thinned pressurized elbows. Int

J Press Vess Piping 2001;78(10):697–703.

128. STR, Zhao W. Finite element analysis and statistical modeling of

pipeline rehabilitation liners with material imperfections. PhD Thesis,

Louisiana Tech Univ 2003.

A.2. Stability problem (STA)

1. Bastard AH, Bell M. Evaluation of buckle arrestor concepts for

reeled pipe-in-pipe. Int Conf Offshore Mech Arctic Engng, Rio de


2. Da Costa AM, et al. An engineering solution to the problem of thermal

buckling of heated pipelines buried in soft clay. Pipes Pipelines Int

2003;48(1):19–31.

3. Dorey AB. Critical buckling strains in energy pipelines. PhD Thesis,

Univ of Alberta, Canada, 2001.

4. Dorey AB, et al. Material property effects on critical buckling strains in

energy pipelines. 4th Int Pipeline Conf, Calgary. New York: ASME

2002;475–84.

5. Einsfeld RA, et al. Buckling analysis of high-temperature pressurized

pipelines with solid–structure interaction. J Brazil Soc Mech Sci 2003;

25(2):164–9.

6. EI-Sawy KM, Elshafei AL. Neural network for the estimation of the

inelastic buckling pressure of loosely fitted liners used for rigid pipe

rehabilitation. Thin-Wall Struct 2003;41(8):785–800.

7. Guarracino F. On the analysis of cylindrical tubes under flexure:

theoretical formulations experimental data and finite element analyses.

Thin-Wall Struct 2003;41(2/3):127–47.

8. Hoo Fatt MS, Xue J. Propagating buckles in corroded pipelines. Marine

Struct 2001;14(6):571–92.

9. Karagiozova D, Jones N. Dynamic buckling of elastic–plastic square

tubes under axial impact—II: structural response. Int J Impact Engng

2004;30(2):167–92.

10. Karamanos SA. Bending instabilities of elastic tubes. Int J Solids Struct

2002;39(8):2059–85.

11. Lin P, et al. Application of plastic buckling of pipes to a structural

fastening system. Trans Jpn Soc Mech Engng, Ser A 2003;69(12):

1753–60.

12. Lin P, et al. Application of plastic buckling of pipes with flange to a

structural fastening system. Trans Jpn Soc Mech Engng, Ser A 2004;

70(5):749–55.

13. Ma W, et al. Effects of lateral stability on the design of HT/HP

flowlines. Int Conf Offshore Mech Arctic Engng, Oslo. New York:

ASME 2002;81–6.

14. Miyazaki M, Negishi H. Influence of geometrical initial imperfection

on dynamic axial compressive deformation of aluminum square tubes.

J Jpn Inst Light Met 2002;52(7):313–7.

15. Mohareb M, et al. Testing analysis of steel pipe segments. J Transport

Engng 2001;127(5):408–17.

16. Mork KJ, et al. Collapse buckling design aspects of titanium alloy

pipes. Int Conf Offshore Mech Arctic Engng, Rio de Janeiro. New

York: ASME 2001;185–94.

17. Murase K, et al. Transition of plastic buckling modes for circular tubes

subjected to an impact axial compressive load. J Soc Mater Sci Jpn

2001;50(7):739–44.

18. Newman KR. Finite element analysis of coiled tubing forces. Coiled

Tubing Conf Exhib, Houston. SPE 2004;139–47.

19. Olso E, Kyriakides S. Internal ring buckle arrestor for pipe-in-pipe

systems. Int J Non-Linear Mech 2003;38(2):267–84.

20. Sriskandarajah T, et al. Dynamic versus static lateral buckling of

subsea pipelines. Int Offshore Polar Engng Conf, Stavanger

2001;185–91.

21. Suzuki N, et al. Effects of a strain hardening exponent on inelastic local

buckling strength and mechanical properties of line pipes. Int Conf

Offshore Mech Arctic Engng, Rio de Janeiro. New York: ASME

2001;99–106.

22. Suzuki N, et al. Local buckling behavior of X100 linepipes. Int

Conf Offshore Mech Arctic Engng, Cancun. New York: ASME

2003;67–76.

23. Tafreshi A. Buckling post-buckling analysis of composite cylindrical

shells with cutouts subjected to internal pressure and axial compression

loads. Int J Press Vess Piping 2002;79(5):351–9.

24. Tutuncu I. Compressive load and buckling response of steel pipelines

during earthquakes. PhD Thesis, Cornell Univ 2001.

25. Vaziri A, et al. Buckling of cracked cylindrical shells with internal

pressure subjected to an axial load. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf,

PVP 2002;451:73–80.

26. Vaziri A, et al. Buckling of the composite cracked cylindrical shells

subjected to axial load. ASME Int Mech Engng Cong, PVP 2003;470:

87–93.

27. Wang B, Lu G. Mushrooming of circular tubes under dynamic axial

loading. Thin-Wall Struct 2002;40(2):167–82.

28. Xue J, et al. Buckle propagation in pipelines with non-uniform

thickness. Ocean Engng 2001;28(10):1383–92.




30. Zhao Q, et al. Numerical simulation of creep-induced buckling

of thin-walled pipe liners. J Press Vess Tech, ASME 2001;123(3):

373–80.

31. Zhao Y, Teng JG. Buckling experiments on cone–cylinder intersec-

tions under internal pressure. J Engng Mech, ASCE 2001;127(12):

1231–9.

32. Zhao Y, Teng JG. A stability design proposal for cone–cylinder

intersections under internal pressure. Int J Press Vess Piping 2003;

80(5):297–309.


A.3. Thermal problem (THE)

1. Alawadhi EM. Thermal insulation using phase change material. ASME

Int Mech Engng Cong, HTD 2003;374:273–9.

2. Allam MA, et al. Tube-to-tubesheet joints: maximum tensile stress and

contact pressure due to thermal loading and temperature cycling. Int

Joint Power Gener Conf, Scottsdale. New York: ASME 2002;51–62.

3. Augutis V, Gailius D. A test method for the evaluation of the heat

insulation layer of heat supply pipes. Insight: Non-Destr Test Cond

Monit 2001;43(6):390–3.

4. Basavaraju C, Fox RC. Temperature attenuation along pipe support

stanchions. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;440:45–58.

5. Bass BR, et al. Overview of the international comparative assessment

study of pressurized thermal shock in reactor pressure vessels(RPV

PTS ICAS). Int J Press Vess Piping 2001;78(2/3):197–211.

6. Bezdikian G, et al. French RPV assessment—contribution of expertises

in mechanical analyses. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;

443:59–71.

7. Bilir S. Transient conjugated heat transfer in pipes involving two-

dimensional wall and axial fluid conduction. Int J Heat Mass Transf

2002;45(8):1781–8.

8. Bonn R, et al. Temperature and residual stress fields in an austenitic

circumferential pipe weld. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;

434:55–62.

9. Broyles RK. Bellows design equations supported by limit analysis.


10. Budden PJ. Validation of the high-temperature structural integrity

procedure R5 by component testing. Int J Press Vess Piping 2003;

80(7/8):517–26.

11. Bugat S, et al. Assessment of the French reactor pressure vessel

integrity in PTS conditions thermalhydraulic and thermomechanical

studies of the small break LOCA. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP

2002;443:79–89.

12. Cardella A. Analytical methodology and boundary problem for

computing temperature and thermal stresses in tubes. Heat Technol

2002;20(1):61–7.

13. Carucci VA, et al. Recommendations for design of vessels for elevated

temperature service. Weld Res Counc Bull No. 470 2002;21.

14. Chattopadhyay S. Structural evaluation of a piping system subject to

thermal stratification. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;440:

59–65.

15. Chen HF, Ponter ARS. Integrity assessment for a tubeplate using the

linear matching method. Int J Press Vess Piping 2004;81(4):327–36.

16. Comini G, Croce G. Connective heat and mass transfer in tube-fin

exchangers under dehumidifying conditions. Num Heat Transf A 2001;

40(6):579–99.

17. Comini G, Croce G. Numerical simulation of convective heat and mass

transfer in banks of tubes. Int J Num Meth Engng 2003;57(12):

1755–73.

18. Da Costa AM, et al. An engineering solution to the problem of thermal

buckling of heated pipelines buried in soft clay. Pipes Pipelines Int

2003;48(1):19–31.

19. Gabrielaitiene I, et al. Analysis of fluid flow and heat transfer in district

heating pipelines using the finite element method. Heat Transf VII.

Southampton: WIT Press 2002;13–22.

20. Hagihara S, Miyazaki N. Finite element analysis for local creep of a

tube coolant piping system in light water reactor due to local heating

under severe accident condition. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP

2002;440:25–32.

21. Han LH. Fire performance of concrete filled steel tubular beam-

columns. J Constr Steel Res 2001;57(6):697–711.

22. Hari Y. Finite element analysis and design of an annular tank. ASME


23. Hari Y, et al. Qualification of a jacketed vessel using finite element

analysis. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2003;469:175–82.

24. Hayashi M, et al. Thermal fatigue crack initiation and arrest behavior in

labyrinth structure subjected to temperature fluctuation in pure water.

Trans Jpn Soc Mech Engng, Ser A 2002;68(6):969–76.

25. Islamoglu Y. Finite element model for thermal analysis of ceramic heat

exchanger tube under axial non-uniform convective heat transfer

coefficient. Mater Des 2004;25(6):479–82.

26. Jen TC, Jadhav R. Thermal management of a heat-pipe drill—a FEM

analysis. ASME Summer Heat Transf Conf, Las Vegas. New York:

ASME 2003;95–102.

27. Jian Su, Da Silva Neto AJ. Simultaneous estimation of inlet

temperature and wall heat flux in turbulent circular pipe flow. Numer

Heat Transf A 2001;40(7):751–66.

28. Jo JC, et al. Numerical analysis of unsteady conjugate heat transfer and

thermal stress for a PWR pressurized surge line pipe subject to thermal

stratification. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;435:121–31.

29. Jorge RMN, Fernandes AA. Design of a steam-heated sterilizer based

on finite element method stress analysis. Int J Press Vess Piping 2001;

78(9):627–35.

30. Keim E, et al. Life management of reactor pressure vessels under

pressurized thermal shock loading: deterministic procedure and

application to Western type of reactors. Int J Press Vess Piping 2001;

78(2/3):85–98.

31. Kim JK, et al. Thermal analysis of hydration heat in concrete structures

with pipe-cooling system. Comput Structures 2001;79(2):163–71.

32. Kim JS, et al. Investigation on constraint effect of reactor pressure

vessel under pressurized thermal shock. Nuclear Engng Des 2003;

219(3):197–206.

33. Lassesen S, Woll F. Compact flanged connections for high temperature

applications. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;433:105–14.

34. Law M, et al. Modelling creep of pressure vessels with thermal

gradients using theta projection data. Int J Press Vess Piping 2002;

79(12):847–51.

35. Lee TJ, et al. A parametric study on pressure–temperature limit curve

using 3-D finite element analyses. Nuclear Engng Des 2002;214(1/2):

73–81.

36. Lidbury DPG, et al. Key features arising from structural analysis of the

NESC-1 PTS benchmark experiment. Int J Press Vess Piping 2001;

78(2/3):225–36.

37. Majumdar S. Structural analysis of electrosleeved tubes under severe

accident transients. Nuclear Engng Des 2001;208(2):167–79.

38. Mallick K. Thermo-micromechanics of microcracking in a cryogenic

pressure vessel. 44th Str Sbr Dyn Mater Conf, Norfolk. Washington,

DC: ALAA; 2003 pp. 3320–9.

39. Marie S. Analytical expression of the thermal stresses in a vessel or

pipe with cladding submitted to any thermal transient. Int J Press Vess

Piping 2004;81(4):303–12.

40. Martin A, et al. Assessment of the French reactor pressure vessel

integrity in PTS conditions. Thermalhydraulic and thermomechanical

studies. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;443:79–89.

41. Masson R, et al. RPV structural integrity assessment during a PTS

event: application of an extended Beremin model consistent with WPS

test results. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;443:51–6.

42. Moinereau D, et al. Methodology for the pressurized thermal shock

evaluation: recent improvements in French RPV PTS assessment. Int

J Press Vess Piping 2001;78(2/3):69–83.

43. Mokamati SV, Prasad RC. Transient-based technique for the evalua-

tion of overall heat transfer coefficient in a concentric tube heat

exchanger. Int J Heat Exchangers 2004;5(1):15–28.

44. Mwanangonze H, et al. Coefficient of thermal expansion characteriz-

ation for plain polyethylene pipe. ASCE Int Conf Pipeline Engng

Constr, Baltimore. New York: ASCE 2003;1302–11.

45. Nicolas L, et al. Results of benchmark calculations based on OLHF-1

test. Nuclear Engng Des 2003;223(3):263–77.

46. Nielsen AH, Smith GH. Thermomechanical analysis of insulated

subsea flowlines. Proc Inst Mech Engng, Part M 2004;218(2):77–91.


47. Peniguel C, et al. Presentation of a numerical 3D approach to tackle

thermal stripping in a PWR nuclear T-junction. ASME Press Vess

Piping Conf, PVP 2003;469:125–32.

48. Penso Mula JA. Fundamental study of failure mechanisms of pressure

vessels under thermo-mechanical cycling in multiphase environments.

PhD Thesis, The Ohio State Univ 2001.

49. Quandir GA, et al. Modeling of wire-on-tube heat exchangers using

finite element method. Finite Elem Anal Des 2002;38(5):417–34.

50. Rahimi M, et al. Thermal stresses in boiler tubes arising from high-

speed cleaning jets. Int J Mech Sci 2003;45(6/7):995–1009.

51. Rouillon Y. French RPV assessment-contribution of expertises in

mechanical analyses. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP, New York:

ASME; 2002;443:59–71.

52. Sandberg C, et al. Analysis for arctic valve heat tracing require-

ments. Petrol Chem Indust Tech Conf, New Orleans. IEEE 2002;

2002:203–8.

53. Sandberg C, et al. Analysis for arctic valve heat tracing requirements.

IEEE Trans Ind Appl 2003;39(5):1462–6.

54. Sarma GB, et al. Modeling studies to predict stresses in composite floor

tubes of black liquor recovery boilers. J Engng Mater Technol, ASME

2001;123(3):349–54.

55. Sato T. Contribution of structural analysis to LNG plant design. 14th

Int Conf Exhib Liquef Nat Gas. GTI 2004;1005–15.

56. Scliffer L, et al. Simulation of the pressure equipment behavior under

thermal loading sealing application. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf,

PVP 2002;433:67–74.

57. Segall AE. Transient analysis of thick-walled piping under polynomial

thermal loading. Nuclear Engng Des 2003;226(3):183–91.

58. Seipp TG, Reichert C. Thermal mixing points: a thermomechanical

stress FEA procedure. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;440:

17–24.

59. Sherry AH, et al. Developments in local approach methodology with

application to the analysis re-analysis of the NESC-1 PTS benchmark

experiment. Int J Press Vess Piping 2001;78(2/3):237–49.

60. Stone HBJ, et al. Modelling of accelerated pipe freezing. Chem Engng

Res Des 2004;82(10):1353–9.

61. Suresh K, et al. Tubular structure deformation under the thermal

loads of two fluids. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;448:

103–9.

62. Taagepera J, et al. Three turnaround heat treating studies. ASME Press


63. Tuma JV, Kranjc J. The temperature distribution in the superheater

tube. Ingenieurwesen/Engng Res 2001;66(4):153–6.

64. Webb RL, Iyengar A. Oval finned tube condenser and design pressure

limits. J Enh Heat Transf 2001;8(3):147–58.

65. Williams DK, Seipp TG. Considerations in the design and analysis of

an ASME Section VIII. Div 2 reactor support skirt. ASME Press Vess

Piping Conf, PVP 2003;469:167–74.

66. Willschutz HG, et al. Analysis and insight about FE-calculations of the

EC-forever-experiments. 10th Int Conf Nucl Engng, IE 2002;10:

595–601.

67. Xin N, Li PJ. Application of pressure vessel design with non-uniform

temperature distribution. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2001;

430:35–9.

68. Yamamoto Y, et al. Verification of alternative stress evaluation criteria

and code elastic limits for primary plus secondary stress. ASME Press


69. Yamamoto Y, et al. Evaluation of thermal stress ratchet in plastic FEA.


70. Yao X, et al. Transient temperature and internal stress analysis of

quenched centric and eccentric cylindrical tubes. Z Metallkd 2003;

94(1):60–6.

71. Youm HK, et al. Fatigue effect of RCS branch line by thermal


72. Zheng B, et al. Combined turbulent forced convection and thermal

radiation in a curved pipe with uniform wall temperature. Nat Heat

Transf Conf, Anaheim. New York: ASME 2001;1627–36.

73. Zheng B, et al. Combined turbulent forced convection and thermal

radiation in a curved pipe with uniform wall temperature. Numer Heat

Transf A 2003;44(2):149–67.

74. Zucca S, et al. Faster on-line calculation of thermal stresses by time

integration. Int J Press Vess Piping 2004;81(5):393–9.

A.4. Fracture mechanics problems (FRA)

1. Abdullah Z, et al. A study of flow induced vibration failures in a large

heat exchanger. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2001;420:1–6.

2. Abou-Hanna J, et al. Prediction of crack coalescence of steam

generator tubes in nuclear power plants. Nuclear Engng Des 2004;

229(2/3):175–87.

3. Acharyya S, et al. The effect of non-crack component on critical

fracture energy of ductile material. Int J Press Vess Piping 2004;

81(4):345–53.

4. Ahn SH, et al. Fracture behavior of straight pipe and elbow with local

wall thinning. Nuclear Engng Des 2002;211(2/3):91–103.

5. Aktaa J, et al. Limit strains for impact loads. First experimental results

of a European research program. Struct Shock Impact VII. South-

ampton:WIT Press 2002;447–56.

6. Alkoles OMS, et al. Ellipticity ratio effects in the energy absorption of

axially crushed composite tubes. Appl Compos Mater 2003;10(6):

339–63.

7. Allam M, Bazergui A. Axial strength of tube-to-tubesheet joints:

finite element and experimental evaluations. J Press Vess Tech,

ASME 2002;124(1):22–31.

8. Alves JL, Roehl D. Numerical evaluation of load capacity of corroded

pipes. ASCE Int Conf Pipeline Engng Constr; Baltimore. New York:

ASCE 2003;1228–37.

9. Andersen A, et al. Protection against high-energy line breaks in

WWER power plants. Nuclear Engng Des 2001;206(2/3):119–28.

10. Andrade-Lima E, Bruno AC. Improving the detection of flaws in steel

pipes using SQUID planar gradiometers. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond

2001;11(1):1299–302.

11. Andrews R, et al. Measurement and modelling of the crack tip

opening angle in a pipeline steel. 4th Int Pipeline Conf, Calgary. New

York: ASME 2002;271–8.

12. Bai H, et al. Scattering of guided waves by circumferential cracks in

steel pipes. J Appl Mech, ASME 2001;68(4):619–31.

13. Bai H, et al. Scattering of guided waves by circumferential cracks in

steel pipes. AIP Conf, No 557A 2001;188–95.

14. Bardi FC, et al. On the axisymmetric progressive crushing of circular

tubes under axial compression. Int J Solids Struct 2003;40(12):

3137–55.

15. Basavaraju C. Analysis of a pipe with a trunnion attachment for

moment loadings. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2001;430:

125–35.

16. Beard S, Chang FK. Design of braided composites for energy

absorption. J Thermoplast Compos Mat 2002;15(1):3–12.

17. Beard SJ. Energy absorption of braided composite tubes. PhD Thesis,

Stanford Univ 2001.

18. Beard SJ, Chang FK. Energy absorption of braided composite tubes.

Int J Crashworth 2002;7(2):191–206.

19. Beardsmore DW, et al. The assessment of reactor pressure vessel

defects allowing for crack tip constraint and its effect on the

calculation of the onset of upper shelf. Int J Press Vess Piping 2003;

80(11):787–95.

20. Benjamin AC, De Andrade EQ. Predicting the failure pressure of

pipelines containing nonuniform depth corrosion defects using the

finite element method. Int Conf Offshore Mech Arctic Engng,

Cancun. New York: ASME 2003;557–64.

21. Bergan PG, et al. Overview of the FPSO- fatigue capacity jip. Int

Conf Offshore Mech Arctic Engng, Oslo. New York: ASME

2002;411–8.


22. Berhheau JM, et al. Prediction of creep rupture of pressure vessels.


23. Bezdikian G, et al. French NPPs life management-reactor coolant

components and reactor pressure vessel integrity assessment. ASME


24. Bezdikian G, et al. French RPV assessment-contribution of expertises

in mechanical analyses. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;

443:59–71.

25. Bilgili E. A parametric study on the circumferential shearing of

rubber tubes: beyond isothermality and material homogeneity.

Kautschuk Gummi Kunst. 2003;56(12):671–6.

26. Bouchard PJ, Bradford RAW. Validated axial residual stress profiles

for fracture assessments of austenitic stainless steel pipe girth welds.


27. Bouyne E, et al. Mechanical and microstructural investigations into

the crack arrest behaviour of a modem 2 1/4 Cr-1 Mo pressure vessel

steel. Fatigue Fract Engng Mater Struct 2001;24(2):105–16.

28. Brear JM, et al. Life assessment of steam reformer radiant catalyst

tubes—the use of damage front propagation methods. Int J Press Vess

Piping 2001;78(11):985–94.

29. Brighenti R. External longitudinal flaws in pipes under complex

loading. J Press Vess Tech, ASME 2001;123(1):139–45.

30. Brooker DC. Numerical modelling of pipeline puncture under

excavator loading. Part I—Development and validation of a FE

material failure model for puncture. Int J Press Vess Piping 2003;

80(10):715–25.

31. Brooker DC. Numerical modelling of pipeline puncture under

excavator loading. Part II—Parametric study. Int J Press Vess Piping

2003;80(10):727–35.

32. Bruno AC, et al. New magnetic techniques for inspection and metal-

loss assessment of oil pipelines. J Magn Magn Mater 2001;226–230:

2061–2.

33. Brust FW, Fredette L. Effect of weld induced residual stresses on pipe

crack opening areas and implications on leak-before-break consider-

ations. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;434:73–9.

34. Budden PJ. Validation of the high-temperature structural integrity

procedure R5 by component testing. Int J Press Vess Piping 2003;

80(7/8):517–26.

35. Burstow MC, et al. The prediction of constraint-dependent R6 failure

assessment lines for a pressure vessel steel via micro-mechanical

modelling of fracture. Int J Press Vess Piping 2003;80(11):775–85.

36. Carpinteri A, et al. Circumferentially notched pipe with an external

surface crack under complex loading. Int J Mech Sci 2003;45(12):

1929–47.

37. Catherine CS, et al. Finite element simulations and empirical

correlation for Charpy-V and subsize Charpy tests on an unirradiated

low-alloy RPV ferritic steel. ASTM Spec Tech Publ; No. 1418

2002;107–36.

38. Cawlet P, et al. The variation of reflection coefficient of extensional

guided waves in pipes from defects as a function of defect depth, axial

extention, circumferential extention. Proc Inst Mech Engng, Part C

2002;216(11):1131–43.

39. Chamis CC, Minnetyan L. Defect/damage tolerance of pressurized

fiber composite shells. Compos Struct 2001;51(2):159–68.

40. Charoenphan S. Computer methods for modeling the progressive

damage of composite material plates and tubes. PhD Thesis, The Univ

of Wisconsin-Madiso 2002.

41. Charoenphan S, et al. Progressive tearing failure in pultruded

composite material tubes. Compos Struct 2004;63(1):45–52.

42. Chas G, Faidy C. Structural integrity of bi-metallic welds in piping

fracture testing and analysis. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP

2001;430:173–88.

43. Chattopadhyay J, et al. J–R curves from through-wall cracked elbow

subjected to in-plane bending moment. J Press Vess Tech, ASME

2003;125(1):36–45.

44. Chen HF, Shu D. Simplified limit analysis of pipelines with multi-

defects. Engng Struct 2001;23(2):207–13.

45. Chen WH, et al. A theoretical procedure for detection of simulated

cracks in a pipe by the direct current potential drop technique. Nuclear

Engng Des 2002;216(1/3):203–11.

46. Chen Y, Lambert S. Analysis of ductile tearing of pipeline-steel in

single notch tension specimens. Int J Fracture 2003;124(3/4):179–99.

47. Chernyavsky AO, Zaitsev NL. Strength of pipelines with corrosion

defects. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2003;464:137–40.

48. Chernyavsky AO, et al. Assessment of the possibility of operating

pipelines with defects. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2003;

464:127–35.

49. Chiesa M, et al. Efficient fracture assessment of pipelines. A

constraint-corrected SENT specimen approach. Engng Fract Mech

2001;68(5):527–47.

50. Choi JB, et al. Development of limit load solutions for corroded gas

pipelines. Int J Press Vess Piping 2003;80(2):121–8.

51. Cizelj L, Riesch-Oppermann H. Modelling the early development of

secondary side stress corrosion cracks in steam generator tubes using

incomplete random tessellation. Nuclear Engng Des 2002;212(1/3):

21–9.

52. Cronin DS. Finite element analysis of complex corrosion defects.


53. Crouch AE, Chell GG, New NDE. technology detects, characterizes

dent, gouge defects. Oil Gas J 2003;101(30):52–8.

54. Czujko J, et al. Strength of process pipes subjected to jet fire. Int Conf

Offshore Mech Arctic Engng, Oslo. New York: ASME 2002;191–8.

55. Das S. Fracture of wrinkled energy pipelines. PhD Thesis, Univ of

Alberta, Canada, 2003.

56. Demma A, et al. Guided waves in curved pipes. AIP Conf Proc; No.

615A 2002;157–64.

57. Demma A, et al. The reflection of the fundamental torsional mode

from cracks and notches in pipes. J Acoust Soc Am 2003;114(2):

611–25.

58. Demma A, et al. The reflection of guided waves from notches in

pipes: a guide for interpreting corrosion measurements. NDT and E

Int 2004;37(3):167–80.

59. Dhar AS, Moore ID. Corrugated high-density polyethylene pipe:

laboratory testing and two-dimensional analysis to develop limit

states design. Transp Res Rec; No. 1814 2002;157–63.

60. Dickson TL, et al. A comparison of fracture mechanics methodologies

for postulated flaws embedded in the wall of a nuclear reactor pressure

vessel. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2001;430:277–83.

61. Dong P, Rawis G. Crack growth behavior in a residual stress field for

vessel type structures. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2003;464:

43–57.

62. Dong P, et al. Fatigue of piping and vessel welds: ASME’s FSRF rules

revisited. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;439:171–90.

63. Dong P, et al. Assessment of ASME’s FSRF rules for vessel and

piping welds using a new structural stress method. Weld World 2003;

47(1/2):31–43.

64. Dotta F, Ruggieri C. Burst pressure predictions of cracked pipelines

using a micromechanics approach. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf,

PVP 2003;464:167–74.

65. Drubay B, et al. A16: guide for defect assessment at elevated

temperature. Int J Press Vess Piping 2003;80(7/8):499–516.

66. Eadie R, et al. Long seam welds in gas and liquids pipelines and near-

neutral ph stress corrosion cracking and corrosion fatigue. 4th Int

Pipeline Conf, Calgary. New York: ASME 2002;1629–34.

67. Figiel L, Kaminski MM. Numerical analysis of fatigue damage

evolution in composite pipe joints. 6th Int Conf Comput Struct Tech,

Prague. Edinbugh: Civil-Comp 2002;315–6.

68. Fonzo A, et al. Full history burst test through finite element analysis.

4th Int Pipeline Conf, Calgary. New York: ASME 2002;333–9.

39. Gao X, et al. Weibull stress model for cleavage fracture under

high-rate loading. Fatigue Fract Engng Mater Struct 2001;24(8):

551–64.

70. Giglio M. Fatigue analysis of different types of pressure vessel nozzle.

Int J Press Vess Piping 2003;80(1):1–8.


71. Gopal KVN, Dattaguru B. Automated modeling and crack

growth simulation in pressurized thin shell panels with multi-site

damage. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP, New York: ASME;

2003;458:143–149.

72. Guarracino F. On the analysis of cylindrical tubes under flexure:

theoretical formulations experimental data and finite element

analyses. Thin-Wall Struct 2003;41(2/3):127–47.

73. Halsen KO, Wastberg S. The applicability of elastic plastic fracture

mechanics parameters for defects in girth welds subjected to cyclic

loading. Int Offshore Polar Engng Conf. ISOPE 2003;563–70.

74. Hassan T, Liu Z. On the difference of fatigue strengths from rotating

bending, four-point bending, and cantilever bending tests. Int J Press

Vess Piping 2001;78(1):19–30.

75. Hayashi M, et al. Thermal fatigue crack initiation and arrest behavior

in labyrinth structure subjected to temperature fluctuation in pure

water. Trans Jpn Soc Mech Engng, Ser A 2002;68(6):969–76.

76. Hayashi T, et al. Guided wave propagation mechanics across a pipe

elbow. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2003;456:43–7.

77. Hayashi T, et al. Guided wave focusing mechanics in pipe. ASME


78. Heitzer M. Plastic limit loads of defective pipes under combined

internal pressure and axial tension. Int J Mech Sci 2002;44(6):

1219–24.

79. Hoogkamer D, et al. Damage tolerance of cracked cylindrical shells

under internal pressure. 42nd Str Sbr Dyn Mater Conf, Seabble. AIAA

2001;2265–76.

80. Hu Y, Hoch A. The 3rd load case of linear design for rehabilitation of

pressurized piping system-flexural tension failure induced by stick

and friction force. Bautechnik 2004;81(5):344–52.

81. Huang X, Lu G. Axisymmetric progressive crushing of circular tubes.

Int J Crashworth 2003;8(1):87–95.

82. Hwang YM, Altan T. FE simulations of the crushing of circular tubes

into triangular cross-sections. J Mater Process Technol 2002;125-126:

833–8.

83. Hyde TH, Sun W. Effect of bending load on the creep failure

behaviour of a pressurised thick walled CrMoV pipe weldment. Int


84. Hyde TH, et al. Effect of weld angle and axial load on the creep failure

behaviour of an internally pressurised thick walled CrMoV pipe weld.


85. Hyde TH, et al. Effect of geometry change on the creep failure life of

internally pressurised pipes. 6th Int Conf Comput Struct Tech,

Prague. Edinburgh: Civil Comp 2002;61–2.

86. Hyde TH, et al. Finite element creep continuum damage mechanics

analysis of pressurised pipe bends with ovality. JSME Inter J, Ser A

2002;45(1):84–9.

87. Hyde TH, et al. Life estimation of pressurised pipe bends using

steady-state creep reference rupture stresses. Int J Press Vess Piping

2002;79(12):799–805.

88. Hyde TH, et al. Life prediction of repaired welds in a pressurised

CrMoV pipe with incorporation of initial damage. Int J Press Vess

Piping 2004;81(1):1–12.

89. Hyde TH, et al. Effect of geometry change on the creep failure life of a

thick-walled CrMoV pipe with a circumferential weldment. Int


90. Hyde TH, et al. Creep properties and failure assessment of new and

fully repaired P91 pipe welds at 923 K. Proc Inst Mech Engng, Part L

2004;218(3):211–22.

91. Ibekwe S, et al. Shear strength characteristics of an ultrasonic welded

lap shear joint. ETCE, Houston; PD 2. New York: ASME 2002;2002:

561–5.

92. Ishikawa N, et al. Evaluation of ductile cracking criterion for grade

X100 linepipe and relationship to large scale fracture behavior. Int


2003;45–55.

93. Jahromi SAJ, et al. Failure analysis of 101-C ammonia plant heat

exchanger. Engng Failure Anal 2003;10(4):405–21.

94. Jayadevan KR. Critical stress intensity factors for cracked hollow

pipes under transient thermal loads. J Therm Stress 2002;25(10):

951–68.

95. Jin X, et al. Study on H2S stress corrosion test of welded joint for X65

pipeline steel and numerical analysis. China Weld 2004;13(1):21–6.

96. Kaliske M, et al. On damage modelling for elastic and viscoelastic

materials at large strain. Computers and Structures 2001;79(22):

2133–41.

97. Kalnins A. Fatigue analysis of pressure vessels with twice-yield

plastic FEA. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2001;419:43–52.

98. Kamaya M. Evaluation of coalescence criteria for parallel cracks.


99. Karamanos SA, et al. Nonlinear response and failure of steel elbows

under in-plane bending and pressure. J Press Vess Tech, ASME 2003;

125(4):393–402.

100. Karstensen AD, et al. Corrosion damage assessment and burst test

validation of 8in X52 linepipe. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP

2001;430:189–94.

101. Keim E, et al. Life management of reactor pressure vessels under

pressurized thermal shock loading: deterministic procedure and

application to Western type of reactors. Int J Press Vess Piping

2001;78(2/3):85–98.

102. Kidwell KM, Rush P. Stress intensity factor solutions for part-

throughwall pipe flaws. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2003;

461:23–8.

103. Kim D, et al. Remote field eddy current testing for detection of stress

corrosion cracks in gas transmission pipelines. Mater Letters 2004;

58(15):2102–4.

104. Kim J, et al. A prediction of bursting failure in tube hydroforming

processes based on ductile fracture criterion. Int J Adv Manuf Tech

2003;22(5/6):357–62.

105. Kim J, et al. Finite element analysis for bursting failure prediction in

bulge forming of a seamed tube. Finite Elem Anal Des 2004;40(9/10):

953–66.

106. Kim JS, et al. Constraint based fracture mechanics analysis

considering variations of crack geometry under pressurized thermal

shock. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2001;430:285–90.

107. Kim JS, et al. A finite element study on the integrity evaluation

method of subclad cracks under pressurized thermal shock transients.


108. Kim WS, et al. Full scale burst test and finite element analysis on

corroded gas pipeline. 4th Int Pipeline Conf, Calgary. New York:

ASME 2002;1501–8.

109. Kim YJ, et al. Reference stress based elastic–plastic fracture analysis

for circumferential through-wall cracked pipes under combined

tension and bending. Engng Fract Mech 2002;69(3):367–88.

110. Kim YJ, et al. Plastic limit pressures for cracked pipes using finite

element limit analyses. Int J Press Vess Piping 2002;79(5):321–30.

111. Kim YJ, et al. Quantification of pressure-induced hoop stress effect on

fracture analysis of circumferential through-wall cracked pipes.

Engng Fract Mech 2002;69(11):1249–67.

112. Kim YJ, et al. Non-linear fracture mechanics analyses of part circum-

ferential surface cracked pipes. Int J Fracture 2002;116(4):347–75.

113. Kim YJ, et al. Elastic–plastic J and COD estimates for axial through-

wall cracked pipes. Int J Press Vess Piping 2002;79(6):451–64.

114. Kim YJ, et al. Reference stress based fracture mechanics analysis for

circumferential through-wall cracked pipes: experimental validation.


115. Kirkemo F, Holden H. Burst and gross plastic deformation limit state

equations for pipes: Part 2-Application. Int Offshore Polar Engng

Conf, Stavanger 2001;85–92.

116. Klimasauskas A, et al. Complex leak-before-break analysis demon-

strated on RBMK-1500 austenitic piping. Int J Press Vess Piping

2003;80(9):655–63.

117. Koh BH, et al. Crack stability evaluation of nuclear main steam pipe

considering load reduction effect. Nuclear Engng Des 2001;203(2/3):

175–84.


118. Koo BG, et al. A finite element study on the integrity evaluation

method of subclad cracks under pressurized thermal shock transients.


119. Koundy V, et al. Simplified modeling of a PWR reactor pressure

vessel lower head failure in the case of a severe accident. ASME Press

Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;443(2):99–104.

120. Kwon O, et al. Effects of residual stress in creep crack growth analysis

of cold bent tubes under internal pressure. Int J Press Vess Piping

2001;78(5):343–50.

121. Lacire MH, et al. J-evaluation by analytical method for cracked

elbows under mechanical loading. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf,

PVP 2002;443:77–84.

122. Laucrova D, et al. Construction of J-Q locus for material of reactor

pressure vessel WWER 440 in the ductile-brittle transition region.

Transfer Fract Mech Charact, Brno. NATO 2002;93–104.

123. Lazor R, et al. Modeling of pipeline repair sleeves. 4th Int Pipeline

Conf, Calgary. New York: ASME 2002;1991–5.

124. Le Mat Hamata N, Shibli IA. Creep crack growth of seam-welded P22

and P91 pipes with artificial defects Part I: Experimental study and

post-test metallography. Int J Press Vess Piping 2001;78(11):819–26.

125. Lee H. The 3D surface crack-front constraints in bimaterial joints.


126. Lee JH, et al. Determination of equivalent single crack based on

coalescence criterion of collinear axial cracks. Nuclear Engng Des

2001;205(1/2):1–11.

127. Lee JS, et al. Application of small punch test to evaluate sigma-phase

embrittlement of pressure vessel cladding material. J Nucl Sci

Technol 2003;40(9):664–71.

127. Lee KS, et al. The limit pressure for a cracked branch junction and

comparison with a cracked plain cylinder. ASME Press Vess Piping

Conf, PVP 2002;443(2):35–43.

129. Lee S1, Koh SK. Residual stress effects on the fatigue life of an

externally grooved thick-walled pressure vessel. Int J Press Vess

Piping 2002;79(2):119–26.

130. Lee TH, et al. A modified technique for crack formation on nuclear

steam generator tubing. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2003;

468:179–83.

131. Lei LP, et al. Bursting failure prediction in tube hydroforming

processes by using rigid-plastic FEM combined with ductile fracture

criterion. Int J Mech Sci 2002;44(7):1411–28.

132. Levy C, et al. The influence of finite three dimensional axial erosion

on the fatigue life of partially autofrettaged pressurized cylinders.


133. Levy C, et al. The influence of finite three dimensional multiple axial

erosions on the fatigue life of partially autofrettaged pressurized

cylinders. High Press Tech, PVP 2002;436:19–25.

134. Levy C, et al. The influence of finite three-dimensional multiple axial

erosions on the fatigue life of partially autofrettaged pressurized

cylinders. J Press Vess Tech, ASME 2003;125(4):379–84.

135. Li G. Reliability analyses of the collapse and burst of elastic/plastic

tubes. PhD Thesis, Rice Univ 2001.

136. Lidbury DPG, et al. Key features arising from structural analysis of

the NESC-1 PTS benchmark experiment. Int J Press Vess Piping

2001;78(2/3):225–36.

137. Lima EA, Bruno AC. Improving the detection of flaws in steel pipes

using SQUID planar gradiometers. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 2001;

11(1):1299–302.

138. Loureiro JF, et al. On the effect of corrosion defects in the burst

pressure of pipelines. Int Conf Offshore Mech Arctic Engng, Rio de


139. Lu JP, et al. Lifetime prediction for ABS pipes subjected to combined

pressure and deflection loading. Polymer Engng Sci 2003;43(2):

444–62.

140. Lu PC, The FEM. based calculation of crack-tip strain rate for

determining the crack growth rate of 304 stainless steel in BWR

environments. Nuclear Engng Des 2001;205(3):227–40.

141. Lucon E, et al. Fracture toughness measurements in the transition

region using sub-size precracked Charpy and cylindrical bar speci-

mens. ASTM Spec Tech Publ; No. 1418 2002;3–17.

142. Lynch MA, et al. Cracked piping branch junctions under pressure and

in-plane bending: comparison of experimental plastic loads and FE

limit loads. J Strain Anal Engng Des 2004;39(2):187–204.

143. Machida H, Yoo YS. Crack opening displacement of a through-wall

crack in a plate subjected to bending load. Nuclear Engng Des 2003;

226(3):193–204.

144. Madi Y, et al. Fracture behavior of mis-matched dissimilar welds:

numerical simulation using local approach. ASME Press Vess Piping

Conf, PVP 2002;434:11–16.

145. Mahdi E, et al. On the collapse of cotton/epoxy tubes under axial

static loading. Appl Compos Mater 2003;10(2):67–84.

146. Majumdar S. Structural analysis of electrosleeved tubes under severe

accident transients. Nuclear Engng Des 2001;208(2):167–79.

147. Mallick K, et al. Thermo-micromechanics of microcracking in a cryo-

genic pressure vessel. 44th Str Sbr Dyn Mater Conf, Norfolk 2003;

3320–9.

148. Mamalis AG, et al. Crushing of hybrid square sandwich composite

vehicle hollow bodyshell with reinforced core subjected to axial

loading: numerical simulation. Compos Struct 2003;61(3):175–86.

149. Mamalis AG, et al. Finite element simulation of the axial collapse of

metallic thin-walled tubes with octagonal cross-section. Thin-Wall

Struct 2003;41(10):891–900.

150. Mamalis AG, et al. Numerical modelling of the axial plastic collapse

of externally grooved steel thin-walled tubes. Int J Crashworth 2003;

8(6):583–90.

151. Mamalis AG, et al. Static and dynamic axial collapse of fiberglass

composite thin-walled tubes: finite element modeling of the crush

zone. Int J Crashworth 2003;8(3):247–54.

152. Margolin BZ, et al. Simulation of Jr-curves for reactor pressure

vessels steels on the basis of a ductile fracture model. Int J Press Vess

Piping 2001;78(10):715–25.

153. Marie S. First ductile tearing test of the vocalist project on a cracked

ferritic pipe submitted to a four-point-bending moment: experiment

and modeling. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP, New York:

ASME; 2003;462:139–46.

154. Marie S, Kayser Y. An analytical method to evaluate J values in

elbows submitted to mechanical loading. ASME Press Vess Piping

Conf, PVP, New York: ASME; 2003;461:37–44.

155. Masada T, Sargand SA. Field demonstration test on construction and

strength of flexible pipe drainage system using flowable fill. ASTM

Spec Tech Publ; No. 1459 2004;115–26.

156. Meguid SA, et al. Finite element modeling of the axial collapse of

foam-filled structures. J Spacecraft Rockets 2002;39(6):828–32.

157. Meguid SA, et al. On the crush behaviour of ultralight foam-filled

structures. Mater Des 2004;25(3):183–9.

158. Meniconi LCM, et al. Stress analysis of pipelines with composite

repairs. 4th Int Pipeline Conf, Calgary. New York: ASME 2002;

2031–7.

159. Merah N, et al. Finite element evaluation of clearance effect on tube-

to-tubesheet joint strength. Int J Press Vess Piping 2003;80(12):

879–85.

160. Milella PP, et al. Failure mode of pipes containing circumferential

cracks under bending and its consequence on the application of

NSCM criterion. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2003;458:

263–8.

161. Miura N. Evaluation of crack opening behavior for cracked pipes-

effect of restraint on crack opening. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf,

PVP 2001;423:135–43.

162. Miyazaki K. Fracture strength and behavior of carbon steel pipes with

local wall thinning subjected to cyclic bending load. Nuclear Engng

Des 2002;214(1/2):127–36.

163. Miyazaki M, Negishi H. Deformation and energy absorption of

aluminum square tubes with dynamic axial compressive load. J Jpn

Inst Light Met 2002;52(7):308–12.


164. Moon SI, et al. Estimation of plastic collapse load of steam generator

tube with two parallel axial through-wall cracks. ASME Press Vess


165. Mork KJ, et al. Collapse and buckling design aspects of titanium alloy

pipes. Int Conf Offshore Mech Arctic Engng, Rio de Janeiro. New

York: ASME 2001;185–94.

166. Mourad HM, Younan MYA. Limit-load analysis of pipe bend under

out-of-plane moment loading and internal pressure. ASME Press Vess

Piping Conf, PVP 2001;430:163–70.

167. Mourad HM, Younan YA. Limit-load analysis of pipe bends under

out-of-plane moment loading and internal pressure. J Press Vess

Tech, ASME 2002;124(1):32–7.

168. Moussa WA. On the interaction of non-coplanar embedded crack with

surface crack in 3D using FE and multi-level sub-structuring. ASME

Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;443(2):163–70.

169. Muscat M, et al. A work criterion for plastic collapse. Int J Press Vess

Piping 2003;80(1):49–58.

170. Nagesh. Finite element analysis of composite pressure vessels with

progressive degradation. Defence Sci J 2003;53(1):75–86.

171. Naudin C, et al. Numerical modeling of fracture toughness in RPV

steel containing segregated zones. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf,

PVP 2002;443(1):69–75.

172. Ni WW, et al. Utilizing finite element analysis to accurately predict

fatigue life of autofrettaged ultra high pressure components. ASME


173. Nicolas L, et al. Results of benchmark calculations based on OLHF-1

test. Nuclear Engng Des 2003;223(3):263–77.

174. Nikbin KM. Sensitivity in creep crack growth predictions of

components due to variability in deriving the fracture mechanics

parameter C*. ASTM Spec Tech Publ; No. 1429 2002;81–102.

175. Noronha DB, et al. Finite element models for the prediction of the

failure pressure of pipelines with long corrosion defects. 4th Int


176. Ochi M, et al. Fatigue crack propagation analysis of a nozzle comer

using the influence function method. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf,

PVP 2002;438:193–9.

177. Oh YJ, et al. Local failure modes of a nuclear reactor pressure vessel

nozzle under severe accident conditions. ASME Press Vess Piping

Conf, PVP 2002;438:41–51.

178. Ohata M, Toyoda M. Application of equivalent damage concept to

evaluation of ductile cracking for linepipe under large scale seismic

loading. Int Conf Offshore Mech Arctic Engng, Cancun. New York:

ASME 2003;77–86.

179. Okamoto A, Ohtake Y. Simplified elastic–plastic analysis method

using Ke factors obtained for the real structural model. J Press Vess

Tech, ASME 2003;125(1):59–64.

180. Papka SD, et al. Full-size testing and analysis of X120 linepipe. Int

Offshore Polar Engng Conf, Honolulu. ISOPE 2003;2300–9.

181. Papka SD, et al. Full-scale burst crack-arrest testing vets X120 line

pipe. Oil Gas J 2004;102(8):54–7.

182. Papka SD, et al. Full-size testing and analysis of X120 linepipe. Int

J Offshore Polar Engng 2004;14(1):42–51.

183. Park YW, et al. Investigation on the interaction effect of two parallel

axial through-wall cracks existing in steam generator tube. Nuclear

Engng Des 2002;214(1/2):13–23.

184. Parrot A, et al. Evaluation of fracture toughness from instrumented

Charpy impact tests for a reactor pressure vessel steel. ASME Press


185. Pasqualino IP, et al. Failure simulation of a buried pipeline under

thermal loading. Int Conf Offshore Mech Arctic Engng, Rio de


186. Patel RD. Creep life assessment of welded trunnion and branch

components using the R5 procedure. Int J Press Vess Piping 2003;

80(10):695–704.

187. Pavankumar TV, et al. Transferability of specimen J-R curve to

straight pipes with throughwall circumferential flaws. Int J Press Vess

Piping 2002;79(2):127–34.

188. Penso Mula JA. Fundamental study of failure mechanisms of pressure

vessels under thermo-mechanical cycling in multiphase environ-

ments. PhD Thesis, The Ohio State Univ 2001.

189. Perl M, Ostraich B. The effect of autofrettage on uniform arrays of 3-

D unequal-depth cracks in a thick-walled cylindrical vessel. ASME


190. Perl M, Ostraich B. Analysis of uniform arrays of three-dimensional

unequal-depth cracks in a thick-walled cylindrical pressure vessel.


191. Perl M, Ostraich B. The favorable effect of autofrettage on uniform

arrays of 3-D unequal-depth cracks in a thick-walled cylindrical

pressure vessel. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2003;455:35–42.

192. Perl M, et al. The influence of multiple axial erosions on the fatigue

life of autofrettaged pressurized cylinders. J Press Vess Tech, ASME

2001;123(3):293–7.

193. Peters DT, Speranza P. A case study of cycle life calculated based on

fatigue life and fracture mechanics. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf,

PVP 2001;418:53–60.

194. Prabhakaran KM, Raj VV. Closed form expression for plastic J-

integral for an elbow with a through-wall crown crack under opening

bending moment. Int J Press Vess Piping 2003;80(1):31–9.

195. RakinM,et al.The influence of microstructureonductile fracture initia-

tion in low-alloyed steel. Mater Sci Forum 2004;453-454:175–80.

196. Rasheed HA, Tassoulas JL. Delamination growth in long composite

tubes under external pressure. Int J Fracture 2001;108(1):1–23.

197. Rathbun HJ, et al. Statistical and constraint loss size effects on

cleavage fracture-implications to measuring toughness in the

transition. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2003;462:31–9.

198. Rauscher F. Fatigue of non-welded pressure vessels made of high

strength steel. Int J Press Vess Piping 2003;80(3):197–204.

199. Redaelli F, et al. On remaining fatigue life fracture mechanics

analysis of free-spanning pipelines using shell and line-spring

elements. Int Conf Offshore Mech Arctic Engng, Oslo. New York:

ASME 2002;207–15.

200. Reinhardt W. Equivalent solid based fatigue analysis of perforated

plates with triangular perforation pattern. ASME Press Vess Piping

Conf, PVP 2002;441:163–75.

201. Reyes A, et al. Square aluminum tubes subjected to oblique loading.

Int J Impact Engng 2003;28(10):1077–106.

202. Rinehart AJ, Keating PB. Fatigue life prediction for short dents in

petroleum pipelines. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;440:

103–11.

203. Rinehart AJ, Keating PB. Length effects on fatigue behavior of

longitudinal pipeline dents. 4th Int Pipeline Conf, Calgary. New

York: ASME 2002;1849–58.

204. Rinehart AJ, Keating PB. Predicting the fatigue life of long dents in

petroleum pipelines. Int Conf Offshore Mech Arctic Engng, Oslo.

New York: ASME 2002;1–9.

205. Rivalin F, et al. Ductile tearing of pipeline-steel wide plates. I:

Dynamic and quasi-static experiments. Engng Fract Mech 2001;

68(3):329–45.

206. Rivalin F, et al. Ductile tearing of pipeline-steel wide plates, II:

Modeling of in-plane crack propagation. Engng Fract Mech 2001;

68(3):347–64.

207. Robinson M, Kochekseraii SB. Parametric survey of upper and lower

bound limit in-plane bending moments for single mitred pipe bends of

various geometries. Int J Press Vess Piping 2002;79(11):735–40.

208. Rudland DL, et al. Development of a procedure for the calculation of

J-R curves from pressed-notch drop weight tear test specimens. 4th Int


209. Rudland DL, et al. Investigation into the use of a single specimen for

the determination of dynamic steady state propagation resistance in

high toughness pipe steels. 4th Int Pipeline Conf, Calgary. New York:

ASME 2002;1477–81.

210. Rudolph J, et al. Fatigue lifetime assessment procedures for welded

pressure vessel components. Int J Press Vess Piping 2002;79(2):

103–12.


211. Ruggieri C, Ferrari JA. Structural behavior of dented tubular members

under lateral loads. J Offshore Mech Arctic Engng, ASME 2004;

126(2):191–7.

212. Ruggieri C, et al. Experimental and numerical study of damaged

tubular members under lateral loads. Int Conf Offshore Mech Arctic

Engng, Oslo. New York: ASME 2002;629–38.

213. Sabapathy PN, et al. Numerical methods to predict failure during the

in-service welding of gas pipelines. J Strain Anal Engng Des 2001;

36(6):611–20.

214. Saevik S, et al. A method for calculating residual and transverse stress

effects in flexible pipe pressure spirals. Int Conf Offshore Mech Arctic

Engng, Rio de Janeiro. New York: ASME 2001;407–13.

215. Samuelson LA, et al. Creep crack growth in welded components—a

numerical study and comparison with the R5 procedures. Int J Press

Vess Piping 2001;78(11):995–1002.

216. Seica MV, Packer JA. Finite element evaluation of the remaining

mechanical strength of deteriorated cast iron pipes. J Engng Mater

Technol, ASME 2004;126(1):95–102.

217. Sherry AH, et al. Developments in local approach methodology with

application to the analysis re-analysis of the NESC-1 PTS benchmark

experiment. Int J Press Vess Piping 2001;78(2/3):237–49.

218. Shim DJ, Kim YJ. Plastic limit solutions for cracked pipes based on 3-

D finite element limit analyses. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP

2002;447:103–10.

219. Shim DJ, et al. Failure strength assessment of pipes with local wall

thinning under combined loading based on finite element analyses.


220. Shim DJ, et al. Approximate elastic–plastic J estimate of cylinders

with off-centered circumferential through-wall cracks. ASME Press


221. Shin KI, et al. Simulation of stress corrosion crack growth in steam

generator tubes. Nuclear Engng Des 2002;214(1/2):91–101.

222. Shin YK, et al. Remote field eddy current technique applied to the

inspection of nonmagnetic steam generator tubes. AIP Conf; No.

557A 2001;392–9.

223. Shiratori M, et al. Failure analysis of thinned wall elbows under

excessive seismic loading. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;

445(1):7–16.

224. Siegele D, et al. Constraint based assessment of postulated nozzle

corner cracks. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;443(2):

73–7.

225. Skallerud B, et al. Integrated local/global analysis and fracture

assessment of pipelines with defects. Int Conf Offshore Mech Arctic

Engng, Rio de Janeiro. New York: ASME 2001;169–77.

226. Sudduth RD. Comparison of the failure conditions for creep, stress

relaxation, and constant strain rate measurements to predict pipe burst

for ABS materials. J Appl Polymer Sci 2004;93(1):247–60.

227. Sun W, et al. Steady-state creep reference rupture stresses for

internally pressurised pipes for use in life prediction. Int J Press Vess

Piping 2002;79(2):135–43.

228. Suzuki N, Toyoda M. Critical compressive strain of linepipes related

to workhardening parameters. Int Conf Offshore Mech Arctic Engng,

Oslo. New York: ASME 2002;217–24.

229. Suzuki N, et al. Effects of a strain hardening exponent on inelastic

local buckling strength and mechanical properties of line pipes. Int

Conf Offshore Mech Arctic Engng, Rio de Janeiro. New York: ASME

2001;99–106.

230. Takada S, et al. Damage directivity in buried pipelines of Kobe City

during the 1995 earthquake. J Earthquake Engng 2002;6(1):1–15.

231. Takahashi Y. Evaluation of leak-before-break assessment method-

ology for pipes with a circumferential through-wall crack. Part III-

Estimation of crack opening. Int J Press Vess Piping 2002;79(7):

525–36.

232. Takahashi Y. Evaluation of leak-before-break assessment method-

ology for pipes with a circumferential through-wall crack. Part II: J-

integral estimation. Int J Press Vess Piping 2002;79(6):393–402.

233. Tateishi M, et al. A numerical model for the crush-worthiness analysis

designed for FRP materials with progressive crushing behavior. J Soc

Mater Sci Jpn 2002;51(5):506–11.

234. Torselletti E, et al. Minimum wall thickness requirements for ultra

deep-water pipelines. Int Conf Offshore Mech Arctic Engng, Cancun.


235. Toscano RG, et al. Determination of the collapse and propagation

pressure of ultra-deepwater pipelines. Int Conf Offshore Mech Arctic

Engng, Cancun. New York: ASME 2003;721–9.

236. Tugcu P. Instability and ductile failure of thin cylindrical tubes under

internal pressure impact. Int J Impact Engng 2003;28(2):183–205.

237. Urabe Y, et al. Simplified J-integral evaluation method for evaluation

of reactor pressure vessel in the upper-shelf region. ASME Press Vess


238. Useche J, Gomez J. A computational model for residual life

assessment of dents generated by explosive loads in pipelines.

Comput Meth Exper Measur XI. Southampton: WIT Press

2003;221–30.

239. Vaziri A, et al. Dynamic response of cracked cylindrical shells with

internal pressure. ASME Int Mech Engng Cong Expo, DE 2002;115:

257–65.

240. Vaziri A, et al. Buckling of cracked cylindrical shells with internal

pressure subjected to an axial load. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf,

PVP 2002;451:73–80.

241. Vaziri A, et al. Buckling of the composite cracked cylindrical shells

subjected to axial load. ASME Int Mech Engng Cong, PVP 2003;470:

87–93.

242. Vecchio RS, Sinha KS. Flaw growth prediction and fitness-for-service

assessment of a PWR nuclear plant steam generator U-tube. ASME


243. Vitali L, et al. Bending capacity of pipes subject to point loads. Int


2003;675–86.

244. Wang X, Lambert SB. On the calculation of stress intensity factors for

surface cracks in welded pipe-plate and tubular joints. Int J Fatigue

2003;25(1):89–96.

245. Wei Y, Chow CL. Prediction of fracture and fatigue damage in

engineering structures. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;

438:187–91.

246. Wilkowski GM, et al. Estimation of crack-driving force in surface-

cracked elbows. J Press Vess Tech, ASME 2001;123(1):32–40.

247. Willschutz HG, et al. Scaled vessel failure experiment analysis and

investigation of a possible vessel support. Ann Meet Nuclear Tech,

Stuttgart. INFORM 2002;173–8.

248. Willschutz HG, et al. Simulation of creep tests with French or German

RPV-steel and investigation of a RPV-support against failure. Ann

Nucl Energy 2003;30(10):1033–63.

249. Wiskel JB, et al. Effect of material characteristics on the properties

of a steel pipe. 4th Int Pipeline Conf, Calgary. New York: ASME

2002;409–13.

250. Wu SJ, Knott JF. Effects of degradation on the mechanical properties

and fracture toughness of a steel pressure-vessel weld metal. Int


251. Xu B, et al. Plastic limit analysis of defective pipelines under complex

loads. Key Engng Mater 2002;233-236(2):709–18.

252. Xu W, Wiesner CS. Static and dynamic fracture toughness of 25 mm

thick single edge notch bend(SENB) of C-Mn pressure vessel

submerged arc weld metal and flaw assessment. J Phys IV 2003;

110:711–6.

253. Yahiaoui K, et al. Evaluation of limit load data for cracked pipe bends

under opening bending and comparisons with existing solutions. Int


254. Yamanaka S, et al. Analysis of the fracture behavior of a hydrided

cladding tube at elevated temperatures by fracture mechanics.

J Alloys Compounds 2002;330-332:400–3.


255. Yang JH, Yoon YS. Detection of metal defects on gas distribution

pipeline by remote field eddy current (RFEC) using finite element

analysis. Oil Gas Sci Tech 2001;56(2):161–79.

256. Yang X, et al. Influencess of some materials on J-estimation methods

for pipes with circumferential surface cracks. Int J Press Vess Piping

2001;78(9):599–605.

257. Yang X, et al. Approximate J-estimation methods for pipes with

circumferential surface cracks in welds. Int J Press Vess Piping 2002;

79(3):203–8.




259. Yoon S, et al. Low cycle fatigue testing of 429EM stainless steel pipe.

Int J Fatigue 2003;25(9/11):1301–7.

260. You XC, et al. Crack arrest in rupturing steel gas pipelines. Int

J Fracture 2003;123(1/2):1–14.

261. Youm HK, et al. Fatigue effect of RCS branch line by thermal


262. Zhang W, et al. Failure assessment of defective gathering tube under

high pressure. Chinese J Mech Engng 2002;15(2):189–92.

263. Zhang XP, et al. Correlation of the microshear toughness and fracture

toughness for pressure vessel steels and structural steels. Int J Press

Vess Piping 2002;79(6):445–50.

264. Zhu XK, Leis BN. Strength criteria and analytic predictions of

failure pressure in line pipes. Int J Offshore Polar Engng 2004;14(2):

125–31.

265. Zhuang Z, You XC. The toughness-induced crack deceleration

mechanism on ultra-high pressure steel gas pipelines. ASME Press


266. Ziehl PH, Fowler TJ. Fiber reinforced vessel design with a damage

criterion approach. Compos Struct 2003;61(4):395–411.

267. Zou Z, et al. Modelling interlaminar and intralaminar damage in

filament-wound pipes under quasi-static indentation. J Compos Mater

2002;36(4):477–99.

A.5. Contact problems (CON)

1. Abid M, Nash DH. Comparative study of the behaviour of

conventional gasketed and compact non-gasketed flanged pipe joints

under bolt up and operating conditions. Int J Press Vess Piping 2003;

80(12):831–41.

2. Abid M, Nash DH. A parametric study of metal-to-metal contact

flanges with optimised geometry for safe stress and no-leak conditions.


3. Allam M, Bazergui A. Axial strength of tube-to-tubesheet joints: finite

element and experimental evaluations. J Press Vess Tech, ASME 2002;

124(1):22–31.

4. Allam MA, et al. Tube-to-tubesheet joints: maximum tensile stress

and contact pressure due to thermal loading and temperature cycling.

Int Joint Power Gener Conf, Scottsdale. New York: ASME

2002;51–62.

5. Baker WJ. A pipe flange for the new millenium. ETCE, Houston. New

York: ASME 2002;2002:693–8.

6. Bitner JL, Raj D. Study of gaps between components during dynamic

loading. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2003;453:205–16.

7. Chiew SP, et al. Moment resistance of steel I-beam to CFT column

connections. J Struct Engng, ASCE 2001;127(10):1164–72.

8. Deininger J. Calculation of lateral contact stiffness of tubes in tube

bundle heat exchangers. ASME Press Vess Piping PVP, New York:

ASME; 2002;446:235–9.

9. Dekker CJ, Brink HJ. External flange loads and Koves-method. Int


10. Elremaily A, Azizinamini A. Design provisions for connections

between steel beams and concrete filled tube columns. J Con Sbr

Steel Res 2001;57(9):971–95.

11. Estrada H, Parsons ID. Design procedures for an FRP stub-flange joint.


12. Fukuoka T, Takaki T. Finite element simulation of bolt-up process of

pipe flange connections. J Press Vess Tech, ASME 2001;123(3):282–7.

13. Fukuoka T, Takaki T. Finite element simulation of the disassembly

process of pipe flange connections. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf,

PVP 2002;433:139–45.

14. Fukuoka T, Takaki T. Finite element simulation of bolt-up process of

pipe flange connections with spiral wound gasket. J Press Vess Tech,

ASME 2003;125(4):371–8.

15. Gurumurthy K, et al. Simplified formula for stress concentration factor

in radial nozzle shell junctions under internal pressure loading. ASME




561–5.

17. Katsuo M, Sawa T, Axisymmetric FEM. analysis and estimation of the

sealing performance in pipe flange connections combining metallic

gasket with adhesive. ASME Int Mech Engng Cong Expo; DE 2002;

115:597–602.

18. Kauer R. Requirements for numerical flange calculations according to

the German nuclear code. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;

433:179–87.

19. Kauer R, et al. A finite element based method for calculating metal-to-

metal type flange joints. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2001;

416:135–9.

20. Kim WB. Ultimate strength of tube-gusset plate connections

considering eccentricity. Engng Struct 2001;23(11):1418–26.

21. Knox EM, et al. Design guidance and structural integrity of bonded

connections in GRE pipes. Compos Part A 2001;32(2):231–41.

22. Koga N, Ohyama K. Shear joining of 6061 aluminum alloy parts of

circular pipe and bar. J Jpn Inst Light Met 2001;51(5):273–8.

23. Kormi K, et al. FE investigation of a spirally slotted tube under axially

compressive static and dynamic impact loading. Int J Crashworth 2003;

8(5):421–31.

24. Kuroiwa T, et al. Interaction between riser and tubing in CVAR

system. Int Offshore Polar Engng Conf. ISOPE 2002;140–6.

25. Lassesen S, Woll F. Compact flanged connections for high temperature

applications. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;433:105–14.

26. Li G, et al. Joining composite pipes using hybrid prepreg welding and

adhesive bonding. Polymer Compos 2003;24(6):697–705.

27. Li R, et al. Elastoplastic contact behavior and shape optimization of

drillpipe thread. Chinese J Mech Engng 2001;14(1):78–81.

28. Lin P, et al. Application of plastic buckling of pipes to a structural

fastening system. Trans Jpn Soc Mech Engng, Ser A 2003;69(12):

1753–60.

29. Lin P, et al. Application of plastic buckling of pipes with flange to a

structural fastening system. Trans Jpn Soc Mech Engng, Ser A 2004;

70(5):749–55.

30. Lynch MA, et al. Cracked piping branch junctions under pressure and

in-plane bending: comparison of experimental plastic loads and FE

limit loads. J Strain Anal Engng Des 2004;39(2):187–204.

31. Matsumoto M, et al. FEM stress analysis and sealing performance

evaluation in pipe flange connections with gaskets subjected to external

bending moments. Trans Jpn Soc Mech Engng, Ser A 2003;69(5):

823–31.

32. McCabe JF. Branch-to-run thickness ratio effects in small piping

branch connections under out-of-plane branch moment loads. ASME


33. Meis RD. Behavior of underground piping joints due to static and

dynamic loading. PhD Thesis, Univ of Nevada, Reno 2003.

34. Meniconi LCM, et al. Preliminary design of composite riser stress

joints. Compos Part A 2001;32(5):597–605.

35. Merah N, et al. Finite element evaluation of clearance effect on tube-

to-tubesheet joint strength. Int J Press Vess Piping 2003;80(12):

879–85.


36. Moirot F, et al. An example of stick-slip and stick-slip-separation

waves. Europ J Mech, A/Solids 2003;22(1):107–18.

37. Nagata S, et al. The effects of flange geometry changes on the stress

distribution in bolted flanged joints. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf,

PVP 2001;416:123–34.

38. Nagata S, et al. A simplified modeling of gasket stress-strain curve for

FEM analysis in bolted flange joint design. ASME Press Vess Piping

Conf, PVP 2002;433:53–8.

39. Nechache A, Bouzid AH. The redistribution of load in bolted gasketed

joints subjected to steady state thermal loading. 10th Int Conf Nucl

Engng, IE 2002;10:743–51.

40. Noda NA, et al. The effect of material difference and flange nominal

size on the sealing performance of new gasketless flanges. Int J Press

Vess Piping 2002;79(12):807–18.

41. Pang SS, et al. Fast joining of composite pipes using UV curing FRP

composites. Polymer Compos 2004;25(3):298–306.

42. Peck JA, et al. Light intensity effect on UV cured FRP coupled

composite pipe joints. Compos Struct 2004;64(3/4):539–46.

43. Peck JA, et al. UV-cured FRP joint thickness effect on coupled

composite pipes. Int SAMPE Tech Conf, Long Beach 2004;3123–35.

44. Peng SW. Seismic resistant connections for concrete filled tube

column-to-wide flange beam moment resisting frames. PhD Thesis,

Lehigh Univ 2001.

45. Peniguel C, et al. Presentation of a numerical 3D approach to tackle

thermal stripping in a PWR nuclear T-junction. ASME Press Vess

Piping Conf, PVP 2003;469:125–32.

46. Porter MA, et al. Investigation and repair of a heat exchanger

tubesheet-to-channel flange. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP

2001;430:47–50.

47. Pozzessere F, et al. Modelling of ferrule strap connections to uPVC

pipes. 9th Int Conf Civil Str Eng Comput. Edinburgh: Civil-Comp

2003;71–2.

48. Rodabaugh EC, Wais EA. Standardized method for developing

flexibility factors for piping components. Weld Res Counc Bull; No.

463 2001;1–26.

49. Sahney MK. A new approach to reducing the stress concentration

factors for cross-bores in blocks under high pressure. ASME Press Vess

Piping Conf, PVP 2003;455:99–103.

50. Sawa T, Higuchi R. FEM stress analysis and sealing performance in

bolted flange connections with cover of pressure vessel subjected to

internal pressure. ASME Int Mech Engng Cong; DE 2003;116:511–9.

51. Sawa T, Matsumoto A. FEM stress analysis and sealing performance in

pipe flange connections with gaskets subjected to internal pressure and

external bending moment. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;

433:81–9.

52. Sawa T, Ogata N. An estimation of the tightness parameter in the pipe

flange connection with gasket under internal pressure. ASME Press


53. Sawa T, Ogata N. Stress analysis and evaluation of the sealing

performance in pipe flange connections with spiral wound gaskets

under internal pressure. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2001;416:

27–34.

54. Sawa T, Ogata N. Stress analysis and the sealing performance evaluation

of pipe flange connection with spiral wound gaskets under internal

pressure. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;433:115–27.

55. Sawa T, et al. Stress analysis and determination of bolt preload in pipe

flange connections with gaskets under internal pressure. J Press Vess

Tech, ASME 2002;124(4):385–96.

56. Sawa T, et al. Stress analysis and an estimation of the sealing

performance in pipe flange connections with spiral wound gasket

subjected to internal pressure. Trans Jpn Soc Mech Engng, Ser A 2002;

68(7):1120–8.

57. Sawa T. Effects of scatter in bolt preload of pipe flange connections

with gaskets on sealing performance. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf,

PVP, New York: ASME; 2003;457:65–75.

58. Sawa T, et al. FEM stress analysis and sealing performance in pipe

flange connections with gaskets subjected to external bending

moment(internal fluid is liquid). ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP

2003;457:85–95.

59. Schindler S, Zeman JL. Stress concentration factors of nozzle-sphere

connections. Int J Press Vess Piping 2003;80(2):87–95.

60. Schwarz MM. Flexibility analysis of the vessel-piping interface. Int


61. Senike WH. A dynamic investigation of piping systems with a bolted

flange. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;440:121–8.

62. Singh RK. Numerical simulation of residual stresses in pressure

tube rolled joints of Indian pressurised heavy water reactor. 10th Int

Conf Nucl Engng, ICONE 10; Arlington. New York: ASME; 2002

pp. 649–656.

63. Skopinsky VN, Smetankin AB. Parametric study of reinforcement of

pressure vessel head with offset nozzle. Int J Press Vess Piping 2003;

80(5):333–43.

64. Srinivasan G, Lehnhoff TF. Bolt head fillet stress concentration factors

in cylindrical pressure vessels. J Press Vess Tech, ASME 2001;123(3):

381–6.

65. Takaki T, Fukuoka T. Finite element analyses of bolt-up operations for

pipe flange connections. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2001;

416:141–7.

66. Takaki T, Fukuoka T, Systematical FE. analysis of bolt assembly

process of pipe flange connections. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf,

PVP 2002;433:147–52.

67. Takaki T, Fukuoka T. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of

pipe flange connections-the case of using compressed asbestos sheet

gasket. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;433:171–7.

68. Takaki T, Fukuoka T. Finite element simulation of the dissassembly

process of pipe flange connections. Trans Jpn Soc Mech Engng, Ser A

2002;68(11):1622–7.

69. Takaki T, Fukuoka T. Effective bolt-up procedure of pipe flange

connections(finite element analyses and elastic interaction coefficient

methods). Trans Jpn Soc Mech Engng, Ser A 2002;68(4):550–7.

70. Takaki T, Fukuoka T. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of

pipe flange connections(in case of using compressed asbestos sheet

gasket). Trans Jpn Soc Mech Engng, Ser A 2002;68(1):8–14.

71. Takaki T, Fukuoka T. Methodical guideline for bolt-up operation of

pipe flange connections(a case using sheet gasket and spiral wound

gasket). ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2003;457:23–30.

72. Wang X, Zheng J. Safety assessment of the junction between a thick

pressure vessel shell and a thinner hemispherical head. ASME Press


73. Xuan FZ, et al. Evaluation of plastic limit load of piping branch

junctions subjected to out-of-plane moment loadings. J Strain Anal

Engng Des 2003;38(5):395–404.

74. Yang C, Guan Z. Stress analysis of composite pipe joints under

combined torsional and tensile loading. Int SAMPE Tech Conf 2001;

33:482–93.

75. Yang C, et al. Stress model of composite pipe joints under bending.

J Compos Mater 2002;36(11):1331–48.

76. Yu S, et al. Sealing behavior of the HTR-10 pressure vessel flanges.

Nuclear Engng Des 2002;216(1/3):247–53.

77. Zhao JQ, et al. Effect of eccentricity and bonding on behaviour of

sliplined pipe. Tunnell Underground Space Tech 2004;19(1):97–110.

78. Zhu M, Hall DE. Creep induced contact and stress evolution in thin-

walled pipe liners. Thin-Wall Struct 2001;39(11):939–59.

79. Zou Z, et al. Modelling interlaminar and intralaminar damage in

filament-wound pipes under quasi-static indentation. J Compos Mater

2002;36(4):477–99.

A.6. Fluid–structure interaction problems (FLU)

1. Botha DE, et al. The role of computational technologies in solving a

fluid induced piping vibration problems. ASME Press Vess Piping

Conf, PVP 2001;424:79–86.


2. Cheval K, et al. Fluid structure interaction in tube bundles using

homogenization techniques. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP

2001;421:95–102.

3. De Medeiros JL, et al. A dynamic modeling of pipeline networks for

dense compressible fluids tuned with time series of plant data. 4th Int


4. Hansson PA, Sandberg G. Dynamic finite element analysis of fluid-

filled pipes. Comp Meth Appl Mech Engng 2001;190(24):3111–20.

5. Jeng DS. Numerical modeling for wave-seabed-pipe interaction in a

non-homogeneous porous seabed. Soil Dyn Earthquake Engng 2001;

21(8):699–712.

6. Jeng DS, Postma PF. Finite element analysis of an offshore pipeline

buried in a porous seabed: effects of cover layer. 8th Int Conf Civil

Struct Engng Comput, Vienna 2001;271–2.

7. Kochupillai J, et al. Model reduction for parametric instability analysis

in shells conveying fluid. J Sound Vib 2003;262(3):633–49.

8. Lafon P, et al. Aeroacoustical coupling in a ducted shallow cavity and

fluid/structure effects on a steam line. J Fluids Struct 2003;18(6):695–713.

9. Lee U, Oh H. The spectral element model for pipelines conveying

internal steady flow. Engng Struct 2003;25(8):1045–55.

10. Lin YH, Chu CL. Active modal control of Timoshenko pipes

conveying fluid. J Chinese Inst Engng 2001;24(1):65–74.

11. Lin YH, et al. Optimal modal vibration suppression of a fluid-conveying

pipe with a divergent mode. J Sound Vib 2004;271(3/5):577–97.

12. Miliou A. Fluid dynamic loading on curved riser pipes. J Offshore


13. Misra AS. Acoustic, fluid–structure and decoupled seismic analysis of

piping systems. PhD Thesis, Univ of Toronto, Canada 2003.

14. Monprapusson T. The coupled radial–axial deformations analysis of

flexible pipes conveying fluid. Int J Num Meth Engng 2004;59(11):

1399–452.

15. Schramm K. Integrity of a curved divider plate in steam generator of

pressurized water reactors due to dynamic pressure loading considering

fluid–structure interaction. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;

446:133–42.

16. Shu D, et al. Investigation of pressure in pipe subjected to axial-

symmetric pulse loading. Int J Impact Engng 2001;25(6):523–36.

17. Sinha JK, et al. Finite element simulation of dynamic behavior of open-

ended cantilever pipe conveying fluid. J Sound Vib 2001;240(1):

189–94.

18. Somashekhar SH, et al. FE approach: electro-mechanical-fluid

interaction of jet pipe electrohydraulic flow control servovalve.

ASME Int Mech, Engng Cong, FPST 2003;10:189–94.

19. Sreejith B, et al. Finite element analysis of fluid–structure interaction in

pipeline systems. Nuclear Engng Des 2004;227(3):313–22.

20. Suresh K, et al. Tubular structure deformation under the thermal loads

of two fluids. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;448:103–9.

21. Ryu SU, et al. Eigenvalue branches and modes for flutter of cantilevered

pipes conveying fluid. Computers and Structures 2002;80(14):1231–41.

22. Thiriet M, et al. Entry length and wall shear stress in uniformly

collapsed-pipe flow. Comput Model Engng Sci 2003;4(3/4):473–88.

23. Zhang YL, et al. A finite element method for modeling the vibration of

initially tensioned thin-walled orthotropic cylindrical tubes conveying

fluid. J Sound Vib 2001;245(1):93–112.

24. Zhang YL, et al. A modal and damping analysis of viscoelastic

Timoshenko tubes conveying fluid. Int J Num Meth Engng 2001;50(2):

419–33.

A.7. Manufacturing of pipes and tubes (MAN)

1. Aguirre F, et al. Bending of steel tubes with luders bands. Int

J Plasticity 2004;20(7):1199–225.

2. Ahmed M, Hashmi MSJ. Three-dimensional finite element simulation

of bulge forming. J Mater Process Technol 2001;119(1/3):387–92.

3. Alexandrova N. Fracture analysis of tube drawing with a mandrel.

J Mater Process Technol 2003;142(3):755–61.

4. Asahi H, et al. Pipe production technology and properties of X120

linepipe. Int Offshore Polar Engng Conf, Honolulu. ISOPE 2003;

2293–9.

5. Asahi H, et al. Pipe production technology and properties of X120

linepipe. Int J Offshore Polar Engng 2004;14(1):36–41.

6. Asnafi N, et al. Tubular hydroforming of automotive side members

with extruded aluminium profiles. J Mater Process Technol 2003;

142(1):93–101.

7. Aue-U-Lan Y, et al. Optimizing tube hydroforming using process

simulation and experimental verification. J Mater Process Technol

2004;146(1):137–43.

8. Bellet M, et al. Application of the arbitrary Eulerian Lagrangian finite

element formulation to the thermomechanical simulation of casting

processes. 10th Int Conf Model Casting Weld; Destin. MMMS

2003;361–8.

9. Bezdikian G, et al. PWR nuclear power plant reactor vessel and

coolant system cast duplex stainless steel elbows new results in

integrity analysis. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2003;469:

91–103.

10. Boudeau N, et al. Influence of material and process parameters on the

development of necking and bursting in flange and tube hydroform-

ing. J Mater Process Technol 2002;125-126:849–55.

11. Carroll N, McElhaney M. Optimization of a rotationally molded

pressure vessel. Ann Tech Conf ANTEC, Nashville. SPE 2003;

1246–9.

12. Cherouat A, et al. Numerical improvement of thin tubes hydroforming

with respect to ductile damage. Int J Mech Sci 2002;44(12):2427–46.

13. Chiba N, et al. Residual stress of thin-wall pipe subjected to

axisymmetric plastic expansion. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP

2002;440:213–20.

14. Cho JH, et al. Deformation texture of cold drawn A16063 tube. Mater

Sci Forum 2002;408-412:565–70.

15. Davies RW, et al. Anisotropic yield locus evolution during cold

pilgering of titanium alloy tubing. J Engng Mater Technol, ASME

2002;124(2):125–34.

16. Dvorkin EN, Toscano RG. Finite element models in the steel industry.

Part II: Analyses of tubular products performance. Computers and

Structures 2003;81(8/11):575–94.

17. Fann KJ, Hsiao PY. Optimization of loading conditions for tube

hydroforming. J Mater Process Technol 2003;140(1/3):520–4.

18. Fukuda N, et al. Experimental and analytical study of cold-bending

process for pipelines. Int Conf Offshore Mech Arctic. Engng, Rio de


19. Fukuda N, et al. Experimental and analytical study of cold bending

process for pipelines. J Offshore Mech Arctic Engng, ASME 2003;

125(2):153–7.

20. Gao L, et al. Classification and analysis of tube hydroforming

processes with respect to adaptive FEM simulations. J Mater Process

Technol 2002;129(1/3):261–7.

21. Gelin JC, Labergere C. Application of optimal design and control

strategies to the forming of thin walled metallic components. J Mater

Process Technol 2002;125-126:565–72.

22. Guan Y. Constitutive modeling for polycrystalline aluminum alloy

extrusions and application to hydroforming of thin-walled tubes. PhD

Thesis, Michigan State Univ 2003.

23. Gupta NK, et al. A study of fold formation in axisymmetric axial

collapse of round tubes. Int J Impact Engng 2001;27(1):87–117.

24. Hama T, et al. Analysis of hydrostatic tube bulging with cylindrical

die using static explicit FEM. Mater Trans 2003;44(5):940–5.

25. Hao N, Li L. Finite element analysis of laser tube bending process.

Appl Surface Sci 2003;208-209:437–41.

26. Hsu QC. Theoretical and experimental study on the hydroforming of

bifurcation tube. J Mater Process Technol 2003;142(2):367–73.

27. Huang YM. Finite element analysis of tube flaring process with a

conical tool. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 2004;24(1/2):91–7.


28. Huang YM, Huang YM. Influence of punch radius and angle on the

outward curling process of tubes. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 2002;19(8):

587–96.

29. Huang YM, Huang YM. An elasto-plastic finite element analysis of

the axisymmetric tube-nosing process with a conical tool. Key Engng

Mater 2002;233-236:371–6.

30. Huh H, et al. Optimization of a roller levelling process for A17001T9

pipes with finite element analysis and Taguchi method. Int J Mach

Tools Manuf 2003;43(4):345–50.

31. Hwang YM, Altan T. Finite element analysis of tube hydroforming

processes in a rectangular die. Finite Elem Anal Des 2003;39(11):

1071–82.

32. Hwang YM, Altan T. Process fusion: tube hydroforming and crushing

in a square die. Proc Inst Mech Engng, Part B 2004;218(2):169–74.

33. Hwang YM, Chen WC. Analysis and finite element simulation of tube

expansion in a rectangular cross-sectional die. Proc Inst Mech Engng,

Part B 2003;217(1):127–35.

34. Hwang YM, Lin YK. Analysis and finite element simulation of the

tube bulge hydroforming process. J Mater Process Technol 2002;125-

126:821–5.

35. Hwang YM, Lin YK. FE-simulations of T-shape tube hydroforming.

Key Engng Mater 2002;233-236:317–22.

36. Imaninejad M, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of

free-bulge formation during hydroforming of aluminum extrusions.


37. Jain N, et al. Finite element analysis of dual hydroforming processes.


38. Jirathearanat S. Advanced methods for finite element simulation for

part and process design in tube hydroforming. PhD Thesis, The Ohio

State Univ 2004.

39. Jirathearanat S, et al. Hydroforming of Y-shapes-product and process

design using FEA simulation and experiments. J Mater Process

Technol 2004;146(1):124–9.

40. Jo HH, et al. Prediction of welding pressure in the non-steady state

porthole die extrusion of A17003 tubes. Int J Mach Tools Manuf

2002;42(6):753–9.

41. Jo HH, et al. Determination of welding pressure in the non-steady-

state porthole die extrusion of improved A17003 hollow section

tubes. J Mater Process Technol 2003;139(1/3):428–33.

42. Johnson KI, et al. A numerical process control method for circular-

tube hydroforming prediction. Int J Plasticity 2004;20(6):1111–37.

43. Kim KJ, et al. Investigation into the improvement of welding strength

in three-dimensional extrusion of tubes using porthole dies. J Mater

Process Technol 2002;130-131:426–31.

44. Kim N, et al. Prediction and design of edge shape of initial strip for

thick tube roll forming using finite element method. J Mater Process

Technol 2003;142(2):479–86.

45. Koc M. Investigation of the effect of loading path and variation in

material properties on robustness of the tube hydroforming process.


46. Koc M. Tribological issues in the tube hydroforming process-

selection of a lubricant for robust conditions for an automotive

structural frame part. J Manuf Sci Engng, ASME 2003;125(3):

484–92.

47. Koc M, Altan T. Application of two dimensional (2D) FEA for the

tube hydroforming process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 2002;42(11):

1285–95.

48. Koc M, et al. On the characteristics of tubular materials for

hydroforming-experimentation and analysis. Int J Mach Tools

Manuf 2001;41(5):761–72.

49. Kridli GT, et al. Investigation of thickness variation and comer filling

in tube hydroforming. J Mater Process Technol 2003;133(3):287–96.

50. Kwan CT. An analysis of the eccentric nosing process of metal tubes.

J Mater Process Technol 2003;140(1/3):530–4.

51. Kwan CT, et al. Die shape design for T-shape tube hydroforming. Int

J Adv Manuf Tech 2004;23(3/4):169–75.

52. Kwan CT, et al. An analysis of the nosing process of metal tubes. Int

J Adv Manuf Tech 2004;23(3/4):190–6.

53. Lang L, et al. A study on numerical simulation of hydroforming of

aluminum alloy tube. J Mater Process Technol 2004;146(3):377–88.

54. Lee H. Bending analysis of oval tubes and optimization of boost

system in rotary draw bender for hydroforming applications. PhD

Thesis, Colorado School of Mines 2004.

55. Lee HT, et al. Fixtures design for controlling distortion of pressure

vessel during fabrication. ASME Int Mech Engng Cong; PVP 2003;

470:53–9.

56. Lee JW, et al. Determination of forming limit of a structural

aluminum tube in rubber pad bending. J Mater Process Technol 2003;

140(1/3):487–93.

57. Lee SH, et al. Cylindrical tube optimization using response surface

method based on stochastic process. J Mater Process Technol 2002;

130-131:490–6.

58. Lee SH, et al. Comparative crash simulations incorporating the results

of sheet forming analyses. Engng Comput 2001;18(5/6):744–58.

59. Lee SW. Study on the forming parameters of the metal bellows.

J Mater Process Technol 2002;130-131:47–53.

60. Li B, et al. Reliability analysis of the tube hydroforming process

based on forming limit diagram. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP

2003;458:301–8.

61. Li C, et al. Numerical simulation of the magnetic pressure in tube

electromagnetic bulging. J Mater Process Technol 2002;123(2):

225–8.

62. Lin FC, Kwan CT. Investigation of T-shape tube hydroforming with

finite element method. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 2003;21(6):420–5.

63. Lin FC, Kwan CT. Application of abductive network and FEM to

predict an acceptable product on T-shape tube hydroforming process.

Computers and Structures 2004;82(15):1189–200.

64. Lu YH. Study of tube flaring ratio and strain rate in the tube flaring

process. Finite Elem Anal Des 2004;40(3):305–18.

65. Ma WQ, et al. Extrusion die CAE of the steel reinforced plastic pipe.

Acta Metall Sinica 2004;17(3):303–6.

66. Mac Donald BJ, Hashmi MSJ. Analysis of die behaviour during bulge

forming operations using the finite element method. Finite Elem Anal

Des 2002;39(2):137–51.

67. Manabe KI, Amino M. Effects of process parameters and material

properties on deformation process in tube hydroforming. J Mater

Process Technol 2002;123(2):285–91.

68. Martin J. Methods, models and assumptions used in finite element

simulation of a pilger metal forming process. ASME Press Vess

Piping Conf, PVP 2003;458:109–19.

69. Miller JE, Kyriakides S. Three-dimensional effects of the bend-stretch

forming of aluminum tubes. Int J Mech Sci 2003;45(1):115–40.

70. Mimaki M, et al. Optimal control analysis of induction heating for

preheating temperature distribution of pipe with upset. Trans Jpn Soc

Mech Engng, Ser C 2003;69(11):3041–6.

71. Montmitonnet P, et al. 3D elastic–plastic finite element simulation of

cold pilgering of zircaloy tubes. J Mater Process Technol 2002;125-

126:814–20.

72. Nagarnachi T, et al. Effect of pass schedule on cross-sectional shapes

of circular seamless pipes reshaped into square shapes by hot roll

sizing mill. Mater Trans JIM 2004;45(4):1322–7.

73. Nefussi G, Combescure A. Coupled buckling and plastic instability

for tube hydroforming. Int J Mech Sci 2002;44(5):899–914.

74. Ngaile G, et al. Lubrication in tube hydroforming(THF) Part I:

Lubrication mechanisms and development of model tests to evaluate

lubricants and die coatings. J Mater Process Technol 2004;146(1):

108–15.

75. Ngaile G, et al. Lubrication in tube hydroforming(THF) Part II:

Performance evaluation of lubricants using LDH test and pear-shaped

tube expansion test. J Mater Process Technol 2004;146(1):116–23.

76. Nguyen B, et al. Analysis of tube free hydroforming using an inverse

approach with FLD-based adjustment of process parameters. J Engng

Mater Technol, ASME 2003;125(2):133–40.


77. Nguyen BN, et al. Analysis of tube hydroforming by means of an

inverse approach. J Manuf Sci Engng, ASME 2003;125(2):369–77.

78. Pipan J, Kosel F. Numerical simulation of rotational symmetric tube

bulging with inside pressure and axial compression. Int J Mech Sci

2002;44(3):645–64.

79. Qi LH, et al. Simulation of liquid infiltration and semi-solid extrusion

for composite tubes by quasi-coupling thermal-mechanical finite

element method. J Mater Sci 2003;38(17):3669–75.

80. Rama SC, et al. A two-dimensional approach for simulation of

hydroforming expansion of tubular cross-sections without axial feed.


81. Rosa PA, et al. Internal inversion of thin-walled tubes using a die:

experimental and theoretical investigation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf

2004;44(71):775–84.

82. Rosa PAR, et al. External inversion of thin-walled tubes using a die:

experimental and theoretical investigation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf

2003;43(8):787–96.

83. Shih CK, et al. A study on seamless tube in the planetary rolling

process. J Mater Process Technol 2002;121(2/3):273–84.

84. Shirayori A, et al. Deformation behavior of tubes with thickness

deviation in circumferential direction during hydraulic free bulging.


85. Smith LM, et al. Double-sided high-pressure tubular hydroforming.


86. Smith LM, et al. Finite element modeling of the tubular hydroforming

process Part 1: Strain rate-independent material model assumption.


87. Strano M, Altan T. An inverse energy approach to determine the flow

stress of tubular materials for hydroforming applications. J Mater


88. Strano M, et al. Virtual process development in tube hydroforming.


89. Sun Z, Yang H. Development of a finite element simulation system

for the tube axial compressive precision forming process. Int J Mach

Tools Manuf 2002;42(1):15–20.

90. Trana K. Finite element simulation of the tube hydroforming process-

bending, preforming and hydroforming. J Mater Process Technol

2002;127(3):401–8.

91. Utsumi N, Sakaki S. Countermeasures against undesirable phenom-

ena in the draw-bending process for extruded square tubes. J Mater


92. Van Putten K, et al. Towards modelling elastic–plastic deformation of

a tube-shaped work-piece under axisymmetric load. Steel Res 2003;

74(3):168–75.

93. Vargas G, Miravete A. Influence of the filament winding process

variables on the mechanical behavior of a composite pressure vessel.

High Perform Struct Mater II. Southampton: WIT Press 2004;109–18.

94. Vollertsen F, Plancak M. On possibilities for the determination of the

coefficient of friction in hydroforming of tubes. J Mater Process

Technol 2002;125-126:412–20.

95. Wang Y, et al. Plastic bulge and energy absorption of stepped

circular thin pipe. Trans Jpn Soc Mech Engng, Ser A 2002;68(8):

1155–62.

96. Wang Z, et al. Numerical and experimental research of the cold

upsetting-extruding of tube flanges. J Mater Process Technol 2001;

110(1):28–35.

97. Wiskel JB, et al. Kinematic behaviour of microalloyed steels

under complex forming conditions. Canad Metall Q 2004;43(1):

125–36.

98. Xu Y, et al. 3D rigid-plastic FEM numerical simulation on tube

spinning. J Mater Process Technol 2001;113(1/3):710–3.

99. Yang H, et al. FEM analysis of mechanism of free deformation under

dieless constraint in axial compressive forming process of tube.


100. Zhan M, et al. A study on a 3D FE simulation method of the NC

bending process of thin-walled tube. J Mater Process Technol 2002;

129(1/3):273–6.

A.8. Welded pipes and pressure vessel components (WEL)

1. Armand S, Jones S. Prediction and testing(ASTM E-837-89) of

residual stresses in structures(operated in sohic environment) caused by

welding. Int Conf Offshore Mech Arctic Engng, Oslo. New York:

ASME 2002;59–74.

2. Bang IW, et al. Numerical simulation of sleeve repair welding of in-

service gas pipelines. Weld J 2002;81(12):273–82.

3. Basavaraju C. Analysis of a pipe with a trunnion attachment for

moment loadings. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2001;430:

125–35.

4. Bonn R, et al. Temperature and residual stress fields in an austenitic

circumferential pipe weld. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;

434:55–62.

5. Bouchard PJ, Bradford RAW. Validated axial residual stress profiles

for fracture assessments of austenitic stainless steel pipe girth welds.


6. Chas G, Faidy C. Structural integrity of bi-metallic welds in piping

fracture testing and analysis. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP

2001;430:173–88.

7. Chauhan V, Feng Z. Pipeline girth weld residual stresses and the effects

of hydrotesting. 4th Int Pipeline Conf, Calgary. New York: ASME

2002;381–8.

8. Dong P, Hong JK. Analysis of IIW X/XV RSDP Phase I round-robin

residual stress results. Weld Res Abroad 2003;49(6/7):1–8.

9. Dong P, et al. Fatigue of piping and vessel welds: ASME’s FSRF rules

revisited. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;439:171–90.

10. Dong P, et al. Effects of repair weld length on residual stress

distribution. J Press Vess Tech, ASME 2002;124(1):74–80.

11. Dong P, et al. Assessment of ASME’s FSRF rules for vessel and piping

welds using a new structural stress method. Weld World 2003;47(1/2):

31–43.

12. Eadie R, et al. Long seam welds in gas and liquids pipelines and near-

neutral pH stress corrosion cracking and corrosion fatigue. 4th Int


13. Finlay JP, et al. Effective stress factors for reinforced butt-welded

branch outlets subjected to internal pressure or external moment loads.


14. Ghanimi Y, et al. Modeling of friction welding of long components.

Trends Welding Int Conf, Phoenix. ASM 2002;329–33.

15. Halsen KO, Wastberg S. The applicability of elastic plastic fracture

mechanics parameters for defects in girth welds subjected to cyclic

loading. Int Offshore Polar Engng Conf. ISOPE 2003;563–70.

16. Hornbach DJ, Prevey PS. The effect of prior cold work on tensile

residual stress development in nuclear weldments. ASME Press Vess


17. Hyde TH, Sun W. Effect of bending load on the creep failure behaviour

of a pressurised thick walled CrMoV pipe weldment. Int J Press Vess

Piping 2002;79(5):331–9.

18. Hyde TH, et al. Effect of weld angle and axial load on the creep failure

behaviour of an internally pressurised thick walled CrMoV pipe weld.


19. Hyde TH, et al. Creep analysis of pressurized circumferential pipe

weldments—a review. J Strain Anal Engng Des 2003;38(1):1–30.

20. Hyde TH, et al. Life prediction of repaired welds in a pressurised

CrMoV pipe with incorporation of initial damage. Int J Press Vess

Piping 2004;81(1):1–12.

21. Hyde TH, et al. Effect of geometry change on the creep failure life of a

thick-walled CrMoV pipe with a circumferential weldment. Int J Press

Vess Piping 2004;81(4):363–71.

22. Hyde TH, et al. Creep properties and failure assessment of new and

fully repaired P91 pipe welds at 923 K. Proc Inst Mech Engng, Part L

2004;218(3):211–22.



561–5.


24. Iyer S, et al. On the response of the tubesheet assembly in CANDU

steam generators during welding and PWHT processes. ASME Press


25. Jin X, et al. Study on H2S stress corrosion test of welded joint for X65

pipeline steel and numerical analysis. China Weld 2004;13(1):21–6.

26. Jo HH, et al. Prediction of welding pressure in the non-steady state

porthole die extrusion of A17003 tubes. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 2002;

42(6):753–9.

27. Jo HH, et al. Determination of welding pressure in the non-steady-state

porthole die extrusion of improved A17003 hollow section tubes.


28. Kim IS, et al. Prediction of welding parameters for pipeline using an

intelligent system. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 2003;22(9/10):713–9.

29. Kim KJ, et al. Investigation into the improvement of welding strength

in three-dimensional extrusion of tubes using porthole dies. J Mater

Process Technol 2002;130-131:426–31.

30. Kim SY, et al. A proper groove design for distortion control of the

multi-pass weldment at pressure vessel. ASME Int Mech Engng Cong;

PVP 2003;470:71–7.

31. Kim WS, et al. The effects of heat input and gas flow rate on weld

integrity for sleeve repair welding of in-service gas pipelines. 4th Int


32. Kockelmann H, et al. Temperature and residual stress fields in an

austenitic circumferential pipe weld. ASME Press Vess Piping; PVP

2002;434:55–62.

33. Kostylev VI, et al. Investigation of residual stresses caused by welding,

cladding and tempering of reactor pressure vessels. ASME Press Vess


34. Lazor R, et al. Modeling of pipeline repair sleeves. 4th Int Pipeline


35. Li G, et al. Joining composite pipes using hybrid prepreg welding and

adhesive bonding. Polymer Compos 2003;24(6):697–705.

36. Lin FY. Ultrasonic testing on two dimensional saddle-like weld via

FEA method. Int SAMPE Tech Conf, Long Beach 2004;1995–2005.

37. Lu H, et al. Criteria for heated band width based on through-thickness

temperature distribution-numerical study on local PWHT of butt

welded pipe(Rep 1). Q J Jpn Weld Soc 2001;19(3):416–23.

38. Madi Y, et al. Fracture behavior of mis-matched dissimilar welds:

numerical simulation using local approach. ASME Press Vess Piping

Conf, PVP 2002;434:11–16.

39. Otegui JL, et al. Influence of multiple sleeve repairs on the structural

integrity of gas pipelines. Int J Press Vess Piping 2002;79(11):759–65.

40. Patel RD. Creep life assessment of welded trunnion and branch

components using the R5 procedure. Int J Press Vess Piping 2003;

80(10):695–704.

41. Sabapathy PN, et al. Numerical models of in-service welding of gas

pipelines. J Mater Process Technol 2001;118(1/3):14–21.

42. Sabapathy PN, et al. Numerical methods to predict failure during the

in-service welding of gas pipelines. J Strain Anal Engng Des 2001;

36(6):611–20.

43. Sablik MJ, et al. Finite element modeling of magnetoacoustic emission

and of stress-induced magnetic effects at seam welds in steel pipes.

J Appl Phys 2001;89(11):6731–3.

44. Thorwald GV, Anderson TL. Finite element case study of local stress

effects in long seam welded piping. Weld Res Counc; Bull; No. 475

2002;1–135.

45. Thorwald GV, et al. Effect of materials and geometrical variables on

creep behaviour of welds. Weld World 2003;47(5/6):15–31.

46. Wang YY, et al. Development of a FAD-based girth weld ECA

procedure Part I Theoretical framework. 4th Int Pipeline Conf,

Calgary. New York: ASME 2002;1717–26.

47. Wang YY. A preliminary strain-based design criterion for pipeline

girth welds. 4th Int Pipeline Conf, Calgary. New York: ASME

2002;415–27.

48. Wen SW, Farrugia DCJ. Finite element modelling of residual stress in

pipe welds. Strain 2001;37(1):15–18.

49. Wilkins JK. Verification of a finite element analysis procedure for

modelling the nonlinear monotonic in-plane behavior of 4 inch

schedule 10 steel elbows. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2003;

464:159–66.

50. Xuan FZ, et al. Plastic limit load of welded piping branch junctions

under internal pressure. Nuclear Engng Des 2003;224(1):1–9.

A.9. Development of special finite elements for pressure

vessels and pipes (ELE)

1. Anderson TL, Brown GW. Special finite elements for piping elbows

and bends at high temperatures with creep. Weld Res Counc Bull; No.

482 2003;1–23.

2. Asada S, et al. Application of shell elements to collapse load analysis.


3. Christoforidis GC, et al. Induced voltages and currents on gas pipelines

with imprefect coatings due to faults in a nearby transmission line.

IEEE Porto Power Tech Proc 2001;4:1–6.

4. Damousis IG, et al. A fuzzy logic system for calculation of the

interference of overhead transmission lines on buried pipelines. Electr

Power Syst Res 2001;57(2):105–13.

5. El-Abbasi N, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of saddle

supported pressure vessels. Int J Mech Sci 2001;43(5):1229–42.

6. Fonseca E, et al. A new finite element for generalized in-plane pipe

loading. experimental and numerical comparison. Comput Engng IV.

Southampton: WIT Press 2003;651–60.

7. Greer JM, Palazotto AN. Nonlinear through-thickness behavior of a

toroidal shell using 2-D finite elements. ASME Int Mech Engng Cong

Expo; AMD 2001;249:305–17.

8. Horr AM, Safi M. Full dynamic analysis of offshore platform using

exact Timoshenko pipe element. J Offshore Mech Arctic Engng,

ASME 2003;125(3):168–75.

9. Maincon P, et al. An efficient finite element for the study of drag chains

for a floating pipeline. Int Conf Offshore Mech Arctic Engng, Oslo.


10. Martinez C, Goncalves R. Laying modeling of submarine pipelines

using contact elements into a corotational formulation. ASME Press


11. Martinez CE, Goncalves R. Laying modeling of submarine pipelines

using contact elements into a corotational formulation. J Offshore


12. Thomas JC, Wielgosz C. Deflections of highly inflated fabric tubes.

Thin-Wall Struct 2004;42(7):1049–66.

13. Xue M, Ding Y. Two kinds of tube elements for transient thermal-

structural analysis of large space structures. Int J Num Meth Engng

2004;59(10):1335–53.

14. Zhao Q, et al. Numerical simulation of creep-induced buckling of thin-

walled pipe liners. J Press Vess Tech, ASME 2001;123(3):373–80.

A.10. Finite element software (SOF)

1. Baloch A, et al. Simulation of pressure- and tube-tooling wire-coating

flows through distributed computation. Int J Num Meth Heat Fluid Flow

2002;12(4):458–93.

2. Basha SM, et al. Assessment of ultimate load capacity for pre-stressed

concrete containment vessel model of PWR design with BARC code

ULCA. 10th Int Conf Nucl Engng, ICONE 2002;10:551–61.

3. Basha SM, et al. Predictions of ultimate load capacity for pre-stressed

concrete containment vessel model with BARC finite element code

ULCA. Ann Nucl Energy 2003;30(4):437–71.

4. Martin A, Bellet S. CFD-tool for thermal-hydraulics pressurised thermal

shock analysis. Qualification of the finite element code N3S. ASME



5. Osage DA. The development of a new pressure vessel code for ASME.


6. Shioya R, et al. Large scale finite element analysis with a balancing

domain decomposition method. Key Engng Mater 2003;243-244:21–6.

7. Weber J. PC Software for the lifetime assessment of pipe bends in the

creep range. VGB Power Tech 2004;84(7):60–5.

8. Zeng X, et al. Mechanics of offshore pipelines in several operating states

and analyzing software. Int Conf Offshore Mech Arctic Engng, Oslo.


A.11. Other topics (OTH)

1. Attia G, Bayoumi S. Effect of side excavation on the structural

behavior of existing pipelines. J Engng Appl Sci 2002;49(3):475–92.

2. Bai KJ, et al. Wave diffraction forces acting on a pipe in a sediment

pocket. Int Conf Offshore Mech Arctic Engng, Rio de Janeiro. New

York: ASME 2001;1035–42.

3. Basavaraju C, Fox RC. Relaxed hanger spans for non-critical piping.


4. Bjornoy OH, Marley MJ. Assessment of corroded pipelines: past,

present and future. 11th Int Offshore Polar Engng Conf, Stavanger

2001;93–101.

5. Brachman RWI, Krushelnitzky RP. Stress concentrations around

circular holes in perforated drainage pipes. Geosynth Int 2002;9(2):

189–213.

6. Bransby MF, et al. Numerical and centrifuge modelling of the upheaval

resistance of buried pipelines. Int Conf Offshore Mech Arctic Engng,

Rio de Janeiro. New York: ASME 2001;265–73.

7. Brocca M, Bazant ZP. Microplane finite element analysis of tube-

squash test of concrete with shear angles up to 70 degree. Int J Num

Meth Engng 2001;52(10):1165–88.

8. Bybee K, et al. Reeled pipe-in-pipe steel catenary riser. JPT, J Petrol

Tech 2002;54(4):58–9.

9. Cantre S. Geotextile tubes-analytical design aspects. Geotext Geo-

membr 2002;20(5):305–19.

10. Chapuis RP, Chenaf D. Effects of monitoring and pumping well pipe

capacities during pumping tests in confined aquifers. Canad Geotech J

2003;40(6):1093–103.

11. Ciaccia M, et al. Nonlinear 3D finite element formulation for the

analysis of submarine pipelines during laying operations. ASME Press


12. Da Costa AM, et al. Soil–structure interaction of heated pipeline buried

in soft clay. 4th Int Pipeline Conf, Calgary. New York: ASME

2002;457–66.

13. Daly R, Bell M. Reeled pipe in pipe steel catenary riser. Int Conf

Offshore Mech Arctic Engng, Rio de Janeiro. New York: ASME

2001;139–47.

14. De Alcantara NP, et al. Investigations into the use of the finite element

method and artificial neural networks in the non-destructive analysis of

metallic tubes. Int Joint Conf Neural Networks, Honolulu. IEEE

2002;1450–4.

15. Dhar AS. Limit states of profiled thermoplastic pipes under deep burial.

PhD Thesis, The Univ of Western Ontario, Canada 2002.

16. Dhar AS. The development of a simplified equation for deflection of

buried pipe. ASCE Int Conf Pipeline Engng Constr; Baltimore. New

York: ASCE 2003;1096–105.

17. Dhar AS, et al. Two-dimensional analyses of thermoplastic culvert

deformations and strains. J Geotech Geoenvir Engng 2004;130(2):

199–208.

18. Fukutomi H, et al. Remote field eddy current technique applied to non-

magnetic steam generator tubes. NDT and E Int 2001;34(1):17–23.

19. Gao FP, et al. Numerical study on the interaction between non-linear

wave, buried pipeline and non-homogeneous porous seabed. Comp

Geotechnics 2003;30(6):535–47.

20. Giacomelli Y, Bell M. Reelability of steel bulkheads for pipe-in-pipe.

Ann Offshore Conf, Houston. OTC 2002;2839–48.

21. Gokhale S, Argent M. Innovation in pipe material for microtunneling

applications. Construct Mater Issues New York: ASCE 2001;2001:

121–32.

22. Gupta A. Kumar Saigal R. Simple formulations to evaluate surface

impacts on buried steel pipelines. Weld Res Counc Bull; No. 479

2003;1–31.

23. Hambric SA. Noise sources and transmission in piping systems. ASME

Int Mech Engng Cong Expo, NCA. New York: ASME; 2002;29:79–90.

24. Harte AM, et al. Evaluation of optimisation techniques in the design of

composite pipelines. J Mater Process Technol 2001;118(1/3):478–84.

25. Harte AM, et al. Application of optimisation methods to the design of

high performance composite pipelines. J Mater Process Technol 2003;

142(1):58–64.

26. Hiremath S, et al. Stiffness analysis of feed back spring and flexure tube

of jet pipe electrohydraulic servovalve using finite element method.

ASME Joint US-Europ Fluid Engng Conf, FED 2002;257:1333–8.

27. Hu HT, et al. Nonlinear analysis of axially loaded concrete-filled tube

columns with confinement effect. J Struct Engng, ASCE 2003;129(10):

1322–9.

28. Hussain CI, Jacobs M. Using check valves as a subsea isolation

system(SSIs) on subsea pipelines and risers. Int Conf Offshore Mech

Arctic Engng, Rio de Janeiro. New York: ASME 2001;57–64.

29. Ibrahim A, et al. Simulation of GRP pipes materials and installations

parameters experimentally and using FEA. ASME Press Vess Piping

Conf, PVP 2002;440:153–60.

30. Ibrahim AA, Zaafarani N. Simulation of GRP underground pipes

installation case study. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2001;417:

27–34.

31. Iimura S. Simplified mechanical model for evaluating stress in

pipeline subject to settlement. Con Sbr Build Mater 2004;18(6):

469–79.

32. Johansson M, Akesson M. Finite element study on concrete-filled steel

tubes using a new confinement sensitive concrete compression model.

Nordic Concrete Res 2002;27:43–62.

33. Kamaraj M, Hari Y. Finite element analysis of corrugated HDPE

underground pipe culverts. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2001;

419:155–63.

34. Khajehpour S, et al. Inclusion of local shell behavior of tubes into a

two-dimensional beam approximation of deformation in nuclear fuel

channels. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;441:45–53.

35. Kim MK, et al. Pipe-soil interaction during transverse permanent

ground deformation. 6th US Conf Woksh Lifeline Earthq Engng; Long

Beach. New York 2003;967–76.

36. Kuroiwa T, et al. Interaction between riser and tubing in CVAR

system. Int Offshore Polar Engng Conf. ISOPE 2002;140–6.

37. Li D, et al. Impact of deep excavations on adjacent buried pipelines.

ASCE Int Conf Pipeline Engng Constr; Baltimore. New York: ASCE

2003;1116–25.

38. Liu JX. Design guide developed for buried pipelines crossing active

faults. Oil Gas J 2004;102(26):58–65.

39. Miyazaki Y, Uchiki M. Deployment dynamics of inflatable tube. 43rd

Str Str Dyn Mater Conf. Washington, DC: AIAA 2002;424–33.

40. Moussou P, et al. Vortex-shedding of a multi-hole orifice synchronized

to an acoustic cavity in a PWR water piping system. ASME Press Vess


41. Netto TA, et al. Sandwich pipes for ultra-deep waters. 4th Int Pipeline


42. Noor MA, Dhar AS. Three-dimensional response of buried pipe under

vehicle loads. ASCE Int Conf Pipeline Engng Constr; Baltimore. New

York: ASCE 2003;658–65.

43. O’Rourke M, et al. Centrifuge modeling of buried pipelines. Tech

Counc Lifeline Earthq Engng Monogr; No. 25 2003;757–68.

44. Rubio N, et al. Design of buried pipes considering the reciprocal soil–

structure interaction. ASCE Int Conf Pipeline Engng Constr;

Baltimore. New York: ASCE 2003;1279–87.

References

[1] Mackerle J. Finite elements in the analysis of pressure vessels and

piping—a bibliography (1976–1996). Int J Press Vess Piping 1996;69:

279–339.

[2] Mackerle J. Finite elements in the analysis of pressure vessels and

piping, an addendum (1996–1998). Int J Press Vess Piping 1999;76:

461–85.

[3] Mackerle J. Finite elements in the analysis of pressure vessels and piping,

an addendum (1998–2001). Int J Press Vess Piping 2002;79:1–26.

[4] Mackerle J. MAKEBASE. An information retrieval system in

structural mechanics for main-frames and personal computers. Engng

Comput 1989;6:178–85.

[5] Mackerle J. An information retrieval system for finite element and

boundary element literature and software. Engng Anal Boundary Elem

1993;11:177–87.

[6] Mackerle J. Finite element methods, a guide to information sources.

Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1991.

[7] Mackerle J. Creep and creep fracture/damage finite element modelling

of engineering materials and structures: an addendum. Int J Press Vess

Piping 2004;81:381–92.

[8] Mackerle J, Fredriksson B. Handbook of finite element software. Lund:


45. Rytter J, et al. A novel compression armour concept for

unbonded flexible pipes. Ann Offshore Tech Conf, Houston. OTC

2002;573–7.

46. Sakamoto H, et al. Deflection of multi-cellular inflatable tubes for

redundant space structures. 42nd Str Str Dyn Mater Conf, Seattle.


47. Schafer BW, McGrath TJ. Buried corrugated thermoplastic

pipe: simulation and design. Transp Res Rec; No. 1849

2003;135–43.

48. Sebastijanovic S, et al. A study of integrity changes in structures during

exploitation. Int Joint Power Gener Conf. New York: ASME 2002;

2002:283–8.

49. Shou KJ, Chang FW. Analysis of pipe-soil interaction for pipejacking.

9th Int Conf Civil Str Engng Comput. Edinburgh: Civil-Comp

2003;297–8.

50. Slatter GL. Suggested bedding factors of controlled low-strength

material for concrete pipe. ASCE Int Conf Pipeline Engng Constr;


51. Sorensen S. Analytic model for the evaluation of inclined piling in

permafrost. Cold Reg Impacts Transport Infrastr; Anchorage. New

York: ASCE; 2002:50–61.

52. Sousa M et al. Use of composite materials to renovate a steel water

pipe. Mater Sci Forum 2004; 455–56: 853–6.

53. Sriskandarajah T, Wilkins R. Assessment of anchor dragging on

gas pipelines. Int Conf Offshore Mech Arctic Eng. ISOPE

2002;24–31.

54. Sriskandarajah T et al. Design for cyclone effects on

exposed subsea pipelines. Int Offshore Polar Engng Conf. ISOPE,

2002:17–23.

55. Strutz JS, Ruth J. Perforated tubes in stiffening systems of multi-storey

buildings. Beton-und Stahlbetonbau 2003;98(10):571–7.

56. Suleiman MT. The structural performance of flexible pipes. PhD

Thesis, Iowa State Univ 2002.

57. Suleiman MT, et al. Analysis of deeply buried flexible pipes. Transp

Res Rec; No. 1849 2003;124–34.

58. Sun L. Centrifuge modeling and finite element analysis of

pipeline buried in liquefiable soil. PhD Thesis, Columbia Univ

2001.

59. Takada S, et al. A new proposal for simplified design of buried steel

pipes crossing active faults. Earthquake Engng Struct Dyn 2001;30(8):

1243–57.

60. Takada S et al. Seismic design of buried pipelines for liquefaction-

induced large ground displacement. Adv Earthquake Eng. South-

ampton: Comput Mech Publ, 2001. p. 619-28.

61. Thomas JC, Wielgosz C. Deflections of highly inflated fabric tubes.

Thin-Wall Struct 2004;42(7):1049–66.

62. Varma AH. Seismic behavior, analysis, and design of high strength

square concrete filled steel tube(CFT) columns. PhD Thesis, Lehigh

Univ 2001.

63. Varma AH, et al. Seismic behavior and modeling of high-strength

composite concrete-filled steel tube(CFT) beam-columns. J Con Sbr

Steel Res 2002;58(5/8):725–58.

64. Vasic D et al. Measurement of ferromagnetic tube wall thickness using

pulsed remote field technique. 12th IMEK0 TC4 Int Symp. Zagreb,

2002, p. 468–72.

65. Villarraga JA, et al. Buried pipe modeling with initial imperfections:


66. Walsh MP. Pro-active fitness for service of 19 meter diameter

NGL surge sphere. ASME Press Vess Piping Conf, PVP 2002;442:

15–22.

67. Wang JT, Johnson AR. Deployment simulation of ultra-lightweight

inflatable structures. 43rd Str Str Dyn Mater Conf. Washington, DC:

AIAA 2002;484–501.

68. Yazdchi M, Crisfield MA. Buoyancy forces and the 2D finite element

analysis of flexible offshore pipes and risers. Int J Num Meth Engng

2002;54(1):61–88.

69. Yin Y, Horoshenkov K. A combined solution to the sound propagation

in the arbitrary-cross section pipe. 10th Int Cong Sound Vib.

Stockholm 2003;3507–14.

70. Yoo C. Finite element analysis of tunnel face reinforced by

longitudinal pipes. Comput Geotech 2002;29(1):73–94.

71. Yoo C, Shin HK. Deformation behaviour of tunnel face reinforced with

longitudinal pipes-laboratory and numerical investigation. Tunnell

Underground Space Tech 2003;18(4):303–19.

72. Yoon CH, et al. Behavior of deep sea mining pipe and its effect on

internal flow. ISOPE Ocean Mining Symp. ISOPE 2003;76–82.

73. Yoshizaki K. Large deformation behavior of buried pipelines with low-

angle elbows subjected to permanent ground deformation. Struct

Eng/Earthquake Engng 2001;18(1):41–52.

74. Yoshizaki K, et al. Large scale experiments of buried steel pipelines

with elbows subjected to permanent ground deformation. Struct

Eng/Earthquake Engng 2003;20(1):1–11.

75. Yun HD, et al. Loading history effects for deepwater S-lay pipelines.

Int Conf Offshore Mech Arctic Engng, Cancun. New York: ASME

2003;833–41.

76. Yun HD, et al. Loading history effects for deep-water S-lay of

pipelines. J Offshore Mech Arctic Engng, ASME 2004;126(2):156–63.

77. Zarghamee MS. Hydrostatic pressure testing of prestressed concrete

cylinder pipe with broken wires. ASCE Int Conf Pipeline Engng

Constr, Baltimore. New York: ASCE 2003;294–303.

78. Zarghamee MS, et al. Risk analysis of prestressed concrete cylinder

pipe with broken wires. ASCE Int Conf Pipeline Engng Constr;


79. Zarghamee MS, et al. Thrust restraint design of concrete pressure pipe.

J Struct Engng, ASCE 2004;130(1):95–107.

80. Zhou J et al. Seismic response and vibration control for free spanning

submarine pipelines. Int Offshore Polar Engng Conf, Stavanger,

2001:180–4.

Studentlitteratur and Chartwell-Bratt; 1988.

caam82n6 finite elements in the analysis of pressure vessels and piping

Documents

squid planar

key features

relaxed hanger

asmes fsrf

rio de janeiro

press vess

ferrule strap

triangular