byron center professional development

37
Byron Center Professional Development November 17, 2011 Erin Busch-Grabemeyer Elizabeth Nelson Common Assessments for Writing

Upload: lars-randolph

Post on 31-Dec-2015

13 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Byron Center Professional Development. November 17, 2011. Common Assessments for Writing. Erin Busch- Grabemeyer Elizabeth Nelson. OBJECTIVES. Common Assessment Experts ________________ Rick Stiggins Mike Schmoker Robert Marzano Steve Chappuis Jan Chappuis Judith Arter - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Byron Center  Professional Development

Byron Center Professional Development

November 17, 2011

Erin Busch-GrabemeyerElizabeth Nelson

Common Assessments for

Writing

Page 2: Byron Center  Professional Development
Page 3: Byron Center  Professional Development

OBJECTIVES

1. Develop a shared understanding of the principles, methods, and design of good writing assessment.

2. Recognize the power of assessment and collaboration as a key to affecting instruction.

3. Look at writing from the perspectives of student work and teacher instruction.

Common AssessmentExperts

________________

Rick Stiggins Mike SchmokerRobert MarzanoSteve ChappuisJan ChappuisJudith Arter

Rick WormeliKen O’ConnerRick DuFour

,

Page 4: Byron Center  Professional Development

What’s the big deal?

I am not a writing teacher!

Isn’t this the job of the

English dept.?Why do we need to use the same

assessment?

I don’t have enough time to cover one more

thing!

Page 5: Byron Center  Professional Development

Nearly 1/3 of high school

graduates are not ready for college-level

writing.

Achieve, Inc., 2005

Page 6: Byron Center  Professional Development

Only 1 out of 4 high

school seniors is a

proficient writer.

Salahu-Din, Persky, and Miller, 2004

.

Page 7: Byron Center  Professional Development

The benchmark for good writing in the 19th century was on “correctness” of mechanics versus the deep rhetorical thinking required today.

Carnegie Report, 2010

Page 8: Byron Center  Professional Development

The Information Age, full of high tech devices, is writing based.

Page 9: Byron Center  Professional Development

Each phase of writing requires problem solving and critical thinking.

Because Writing Matters, Carl Nagin and NWP

Page 10: Byron Center  Professional Development

Writing can support

learning and retention of knowledge in all disciplines

Writing to Learn, William Zinsser

Page 11: Byron Center  Professional Development

Good writing is essential

For obtaining• high school diploma

• college degree• acquiring a good job

• participating in society.

Page 12: Byron Center  Professional Development

Who is the stakeholder?

How we assess depends on why we assess.

Step 1

Page 13: Byron Center  Professional Development

Why Assess?

Accountabi

lity

Page 14: Byron Center  Professional Development

Why Assess?

Motivat

ion

Page 15: Byron Center  Professional Development

Why Assess?

Monitor

Progress

Page 16: Byron Center  Professional Development

Why Assess?

Provide

Feedback

Page 17: Byron Center  Professional Development

Why Assess?

Inform

Instruct

ion

Page 18: Byron Center  Professional Development

Why Assess?

Judge

Teacher

Effectiven

ess

Page 19: Byron Center  Professional Development

Why Assess?

Determine

Strengths

Page 20: Byron Center  Professional Development

Why Assess?

Determine

areas of

deficiency

Page 21: Byron Center  Professional Development

Why Assess?

Report to

parents

Page 22: Byron Center  Professional Development

Why Assess?

Determine how

many meet

standards

Page 23: Byron Center  Professional Development

Why Assess?

Measure

American

students’

success

Page 24: Byron Center  Professional Development

ASSESSMENTUSER

Assessment for Learning

(IN)FORMATIVE

Assessment of LearningSUMMATIVE

Students

Am I improving over time?Do I know what it means to succeed?What should I do next?What help do I need?

Am I succeeding at the level that I should be?Am I capable of success?How am I doing in relationship to my classmates?Is the learning worth the effort?

Teachers

What does this student need?What do these students need?What are student strengths to build on?How should I group my students?Am I going too fast? Too slow? Too far? Not far enough?

What grade do I put on the report card?What students need to be referred for special service?What will I tell parents?

Parents

What can we do at home to support learning?Is my child learning new things?

Is my child keeping up?Is this teacher doing a good job?Is this a good school? District?

Principal

   Is instruction producing results?Are students ready for the workplace or the next step in learning?How shall we allocate building resources to achieve success?

Superintendent

   Are our programs of instruction producing desired results?Is each building producing results?Which schools need additional resources?How shall we allocate district resources to achieve success?

Page 25: Byron Center  Professional Development

Formative Assessment Qualities Summative Assessment Qualities

On-going, daily instruction At the end..no “do over”

Used to inform students and teachers what has been learned and what do students still need while the teacher is still teaching.

Used to examine teaching strategies and curriculum strengths and weaknesses

Informs both the teacher and the learner in order to adjust instruction along the way

Informs instruction for next year or course design. May provide effective teaching strategies

Focus is on understanding the task Focus is on mastery at a given point

Allows for immediate feedback to teacher and student

Means to sift and sort students for placement

Page 27: Byron Center  Professional Development

What did I want my

students to learn?

Step 2

Page 29: Byron Center  Professional Development

Is this of sound

assessment design?

How do we know the assessment measures

this? Step 3

Page 30: Byron Center  Professional Development

Sound Assessment Design

Create quality rubrics

Control for bias

Design the assessment so that students can self- assess and set goals

Page 31: Byron Center  Professional Development

Do we have a shared

understanding of what student learning

should look like?

What is our inter-rater reliability?

Step 4

Inter-rater reliability is dependent upon the ability of two or more individuals to be consistent.

Page 32: Byron Center  Professional Development

This involves a change

in focus from looking

at our work to looking

at student work.

What is our inter-rater reliability?

Page 33: Byron Center  Professional Development

What is our inter-rater reliability?

Page 34: Byron Center  Professional Development

No one assessment can measure

everything or do everything

for all stakeholders

There are many different kinds of writing

assessments

Page 35: Byron Center  Professional Development

Where am I going?

1. Provide a clear learning target

2. Use examples and models of strong and weak work

Where am I now?

3. Offer descriptive feedback

4. Teach students to self assess and set goals

How can I close the gap?

5. Design lessons to focus on one aspect of quality at a time

6. Teach students focused revision

7. Engage students in self-reflection and share in their learning

7 Practices of Assessment FOR Learning

Classroom Assessment for Student Learning: Doing It Right, Using It Well by Rick Stiggins (2004)

Page 36: Byron Center  Professional Development

Remember: You are not in this alone.

Where do we begin?

Page 37: Byron Center  Professional Development

Working Together will share the work load and allow you to create the best assessments.