bseep-slide presentation-poul erik kristensen-energy efficiency in new buildings

8/18/2019 Bseep-slide Presentation-poul Erik Kristensen-Energy Efficiency in New Buildings

1/66

4/27/2

Poul E. Kristensen

BSEEP Chief Technical Adviser

IEN Consultants Sdn Bhd, MD

KLIA 2

New JKR/Ministry of Works HQThe Diamond Bui lding

BSEEP Seminar Energy Efficiency in Non-Domestic Buildings

Mercu Mustapha Kamal

BSEEP Seminars in Kota Kinabalu and Kuching 25 and 26 April 2012

Presentation 1 : Energy Efficiency in New Buildings

Poul E. Kristensen

BSEEP Chief Technical Adviser

KLIA 2

The Building Sector Energy Efficiency Program (BSEEP)

BSEEP Objectives :

To have 55% Energy Efficiency implemented in the Building By-Laws by 2015

To have a market for energy retrofit for existing buildings by 2015

To have a series of documented EE demonstration projects by 2015

To have a general acceptance of EE principles in the building industry by 2015

To make energy efficient low carbon buildings state of the art by 2015

NSC meeting

29 March 2012BSEEP Seminars in Kota Kinabalu and Kuching 25 and 26 April 2012


2/66

4/27/2

Energy Efficiency in Buildings in Europe

Case Germany

.

Building stock before

1978 1978-95 1995-2002

New Buildings

2002 2008/09 2012

Passive

House(new)

Efficient

Homesdena

kWh/m2year

Passive

House(new)

New

Buildings2020

0

55% down over 20 years

NSC meeting


NSC meeting

29 March 2012

Component 5 Building EE Demonstrations

2. Tune Hotels : a new Airport Hotel at KLIA 2

3. Ipoh Hospital : Energy Retrofit of the Main Hospital Complex

4. Mercu Mustpha Kamal : A new Corporate HQ in Damansara Perdana

5. Ken Holdings : A new office building in Taman Tun Dr, Ismail

6. Ken Rimba : a Link House Development in Shah Alam

7. KKR2 : the new Ministry of Works/JKR HQ in KL

8. Rafflesia @ the Peak : New Semi-D development in Damansara Perdana

9. National Aviation Academy : A new Aviation Training Centre in Subang

10. An office retrofit project ( yet to be identified )

List of demonstration projects in the pipeline

NSC meeting

29 March 2012

1. BSEEP Demo Office at JKR : the project office for the BSEEP team



3/66

4/27/2

Design Strategies for New Office Buildings

CK Tang, Poul Kristensen and Steve Lojuntin2004

2012 : Develop Guidebook on EE in Buildings

Energy Efficiency in Architecture ( “passive design”)

Energy Efficiency in Mechanical, and

Electrical Systems (“active design” )

Integrated Energy Design of Buildings

Significant advances have been made in

Availability of EE components and systems

Significant advances have been made in

understanding EE design of buildings

in the tropical climate

The New Design Guide, contents :

NSC meeting


Component 4 Information and Awareness Enhancement

NSC meeting

29 March 2012

MS 1525:2007

Code of Practice on Energy Efficiency

and use of Renewable Energy

for Non-Residential Buildings

A voluntary standard

BSEEP Objectives

An office designed as per MS 1525:2007

may still have an energy index of

~ 200 kWh/m2year

To update MS 1525 to target an

Energy Index of 100 – 110 kWh/m2year

To develop an energy rating system

for buildings ( ~ Napers in Australia)

“One Star – Five Star”

To Implement MS1525:2014

in the Unified Building By-Laws


Component 2 Policy Development and Regulatory Framework


4/66

4/27/2

NSC meeting

29 March 2012

Component 1 Institutional Capacity Development

2012

Implementation of 5 Training Programs on Building Energy Management( Penang, KL, JB, KK and Kuching)

Workshop on energy renovation of existing buildings

For Government agencies and private sector ESCO‟s

Preparation of Scientific Energy Management Guidelines for Government

Institutions

Planning of a comprehensive Building Energy Rating and Monitoring

(BERM) Program

Implementation of online monitoring in all BSEEP Demonstration Buildings

Implementation of online monitoring in additionally 10 selected buildings,

5 in the Government Sector and 5 in the private Sector

Implementation of multiple Training Programs on Building Energy Management

Implement online monitoring in multiple buildings, public and private


Energy Management : too cold is uncomfortable and expensive !



5/66

4/27/2


Polar ice is melting

Sea Water Level is increasing

Droughts and heat waves

Violent weather and hurricanes



6/66

4/27/2

COP 15 Copenhagen, December 2009

“Malaysia wish to reduce CO2 Intensity by 40% in 2020 compared to 2005”

Malaysia’s Commitment to Reduce CO2 Emissions




7/66

4/27/2


• Good daylight conditions

• Lower energy consumption ~ lower running cost

• Good and healthy indoor climate

• Enhanced productivity

• Less medical leave

• Green image for marketing

• Green technologies are visible

and state-of-the-art

Benefits for occupants in a green and energy efficient building

A Green Bu i ld ing

Energy Efficiency, Water Efficiency, Reduction of Waste, Good Indoor Air Quality IAQ

Indoor Air

Quality

Water

EfficiencyEnergy

Efficiency

Waste

Management

Other Green

Features &

Innovation

BSEEP Seminars in Kota Kinabalu and Kuching 25 and 26 April 2012BSEEP Seminars in Kota Kinabalu and Kuching 25 and 26 April 2012


8/66

4/27/2


A Green Rated Building, the Tangible Benefits

50%60%

50%

2 ~

16%

65%

Waste Water Energy CO2

Productivity



9/66

4/27/2

People, Performance and Health


Coal

The Route to Low Carbon Buildings

COAL

Electricity

Biomass

( District

Cooling )

Solar

PVGas

Solar PV

CO2 emissions ( invincible)

Heat loss

1. Reduce Consum pt ion 2. Impro ve Eff iciency 3. Cleaner Fu els

Warm water

Malaysian fuel mix :

0.65 kg CO2 is emitted / kWh electricity

Coal : 0.95 kg CO2/kWh

Gas : 0.59 kg CO2/kWh

Hydro : 0 kg CO2/kWh



10/66

4/27/2

Saving GW‟s is Cheaper than Building GW‟s

NSC meeting




11/66

4/27/2


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450

Energy Efficiency Index (kWh/m2/year)

C u m u l a t i v e p e r c e n t i l e

Malaysia(41 office

buildings)

Singapore

(95 office

buildings)

Source: EAEF Project 64

Project leader: National University of Singapore, 2006

Energy Efficiency of Office Buildings 2011

LEO Building

Low energy office building

Malaysia, 2004

GEO Building

Super Low Energy office building

Malaysia, 2007

Diamond Building 2010

Energy Efficient Green Mark Platinum

Shell Building Cyberjaya 2010

Energy Efficient LEED Gold

210BSEEP 90Award Winner2006


12/66

4/27/2

BSEEP Target 2015 : New Buildings have an energy index 50% lower than today

Possible by 2020 : New Buildings will be Zero Energy


Reduction of Energy Consumption in OfficesWhere can the savings be achieved? Opportunities Obstacles

Plug LoadsSave 30 – 50 %

Using EE computers

Lack of awareness on the magnitude of IT

power consumption.

LightingUse daylight and solar control glazing

50 – 90 % reduction

( EE fixtures and daylight use )

Lack of knowledge on daylight design in the

tropics ( heat and glare ).

CoolingSave 50 – 80 %

Reducing the load,

Improve efficiency ( COP ) of chiller

Lack of knowledge on chiller sizing.

Lack of knowledge regarding what the heat

loads are.

Fan Energy 50 – 80 % reductionLack of awareness on low pressure duct design

and efficient fan design management.


http://rds.yahoo.com/S=96062883/K=Energy+Efficient+LIGHT+BULB/v=2/SID=w/l=IVI/*-http:/www.goholistic.co.uk/images/9w_low_energy.jpg


13/66

4/27/2




14/66

4/27/2

Reduce Static Ventilation Electricity Load

75% Fan Energy Reduction can

be achieved! – Reduces friction lost – larger

duct size.

– Reduces static pressure from

1000 Pa to 200 – 300 Pa

Increase efficiency of Fan. – 20 years old Fan efficiency ≈ 30%

– Typical efficiency today ≈ 50%

– Energy Efficient Fan ≈ 70%

Increase efficiency of Motor




15/66

4/27/2


Typical Office Lighting Load

Bad Design : 25 – 40 W/m2

Typical Design : 15 – 25 W/m2

MS1525 : 15 W/m2

KeTTHA LEO Bldg : 12 W/m2

Greentech GEO BLDG : 4.8 W/m2



16/66

4/27/2


Low Carbon Buildings : How the architects can make it happen

Orientation : protect the façade, N and S is preferable

Façade : WW-ratio : 40 – 50% optimal

Glazing : Double Glazing with solar control film ( spectrally selective film)

Thermal insulation : 50 mm in the walls, 100 – 150 mm in the roof

Daylight Design : allow the light in without the heat, control glare !

Green Roofs : good, but it does not make thermal insulation obsolete

Greenery around the building to reduce local Heat Island Effect

Design the lighting system to benefit from daylight use

Integrated Design of ventilation and cooling system to optimize the energy design

Make the building airtight and keep it that way !



17/66

4/27/2

Glazing in Buildings : Must be balanced and not excessive

Pullman Hotel Lobby




18/66


19/66

4/27/2

The use of Daylight as the Main Light Source


Facade Daylighting

Mirror Lightshelf

- direct sun not reflected inside

- diffuse light reflected inside

Fixed daylighting blindinside double pane window

a) Blind, top surface:Specular reflective

b) Blind, low surface:Mat white



20/66

4/27/2

98 % Daylit During Daytime

Let the light in without the heat and without glare




21/66

4/27/2

Daylight is „Cool‟

Luminous Efficacy

15 18

100

200

130

65

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

Incandescent Low voltage

halogen

Fluroscent

lamp

Direct

Sunshine

Clear sky

daylight

"Cool

Daylight"

L u m e n / w a t t


31 May 2010

Energy Commission of Malaysia Diamond Building Green Mark Platinum Certified

1st in Malaysia

GBI Platinum Certified


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Halogen_bulb.jpg


22/66

4/27/2


Green Roof Feature 7 : R o o f/ F l o o r S l a b C o o l i n g

22

Floor slab cooling pipeslaid before pouring of

concrete

Manifold riser for slabcooling pipes (PERT pipes)

Section of Typical Roof/floor slab



23/66

4/27/2

The BSEEP Demonstration Program on Energy Efficient Buildings

Proof of Concept

Proof of Technical Feasibility

Proof of Economical Feasibility


The BSEEP Demonstration Program on Energy Efficient Buildings

Proof of Technical Feasibility Proof of Economical Feasibility

New non-domestic buildings( office buildings) : reduce the Energy

Index from typically 220 kWh/m2

year to90 kWh/m2year, a reduction of 60%.

Existing non-domestic buildings( office buildings) : Reduce the energy

consumption by 40 - 50%, depending on theactual building.

New housing and existing housing : Areduction of the energy consumption of at

least 50% to be achieved, including theuse of energy efficient appliances for the

kitchen.

Performance Targets :



24/66

4/27/2

NSC meeting

29 March 2012


2. Tune Hotels : a new Airport Hotel at KLIA 2

3. Ipoh Hospital : Energy Retrofit of the Main Hospital Complex

4. Mercu Mustpha Kamal : A new Corporate HQ in Damansara Perdana

5. Ken Holdings : A new office building in Taman Tun Dr, Ismail

6. Ken Rimba : a Link House Development in Shah Alam

7. KKR2 : the new Ministry of Works/JKR HQ in KL

8. Rafflesia @ the Peak : New Semi-D development in Damansara Perdana

9. National Aviation Academy : A new Aviation Training Centre in Subang

10. An office retrofit project ( yet to be identified )

List of demonstration projects in the pipeline

NSC meeting

29 March 2012

1. BSEEP Demo Office at JKR : the project office for the BSEEP team


NSC meeting

29 March 2012

2012

2012



25/66


26/66

4/27/2

NSC meeting


NSC meeting



27/66

4/27/2

NSC meeting


NSC meeting



28/66

4/27/2

NSC meeting


SEB New Headquarter in Kuching

Architect : Jurubina


29/66

4/27/2




30/66

4/27/2

Green Cost Premium (Singapore)

Green Mark Certified Gold Gold plus Platinum

Points 50 - 74 75 - 84 85 - 89 90 - 100

Cost Premium 0.3 - 1% 1 - 2% 1 - 3% 2 - 8%

Payback

Period

2 - 5 yrs 2 - 6 yrs 2 - 6 yrs 2 - 8 yrs

Source: BCA Singapore 2008


Energy Efficiency and GBI rating in Malaysian Office Buildings

2 – 4 % 5 – 10 %3 – 8 % 10 – 20 %

Reference : Experiences from IEN with 10+ projects in Malaysia



31/66

4/27/2

www.ien.com.myBSEEP Seminars in Kota Kinabalu and Kuching 25 and 26 April 2012

To make energy eff icient low carbo n bui ld ings s tate of the art in Malaysia by 2015

Thanks for your attention



32/66

4/27/2


Where do the Carbon Emissions Come From ?

From Cars and Power Plants



33/66


34/66

4/27/2

Does Climate Protection Pay Off ?


35/66

4/27/2

World Renewable Energy Sources

Source:Energy [r]evolution A sustainable World Energy

Outlook, January 2007

Solar Energy

=

2850 x World Energy

Earth‟s

Energy Consumption


36/66

4/27/2

Biomass and Biofuel in Malaysia : Where does it come from ?

Palm diesel or bio-ethanol ( 2nd Generation)

Empty Fruit Bunches

Oil

Gold

Shell HQ in KLby

MRCB

and

Hijjas KastureI architects


37/66

4/27/2

Ministry of Works HQ by

Ahmad Zaki Sdn Bhdand

GDP Arctitects

Platinum

EI :100 kWh/m2year


MK Business Centre IN KLby

EMKAY Groupand

Architects 61

Gold



38/66

4/27/2

KL Eco City by SP Setia

Phase 1 : 2010 - 2014

LEED and GBI Certification

The new KLIA Low Cost Carrier Terminal

The most Green Airport Terminal in Asia

Target LEED Gold


39/66

4/27/2

LEED CERTIFIED SILVER GOLD PLATINUM

LEED POINTS 23 - 27 28 - 33 34 - 44 45 - 61

ENERGY SAVINGS 25 – 35% 35 – 50% 50 – 60% > 60%

ANNUAL UTILITYSAVINGS

US$ 0.40 / sqft US$ 0.60 / sqft US$ 0.80 / sqft US$ 1.00 / sqft

PAYBACK PERIOD Under 3 yrs 3 – 5 yrs 5 – 10 yrs 10+ yrs

INCREMENTAL CONSTRUCTION COST

SMALL BUILDINGS 3% 7% 10% 15%

LARGE BUILDINGS 1% 3% 5% 8%

Source: Enermodal Engineering, Denver, USA

Does GREEN pay off? (USA)



40/66

4/27/2

Build GreenBecause grey buildings will loose in

The property market of the future

If you do not build green, you build obsolete

Build Green

IEN Consultants Sdn Bhd

www.ien.com.my


Global Warming is the Challenge

The building sector is the single most largest emitter

The building sector must deliver on reducing CO2 emissions

Source : IEA ECBCS


41/66

4/27/2

Source : Global Footprint Network and WBCSD Vision 2050, 2010

We have only One Earth

No of Earth Required to Sustain Present Lifestyles in USA


42/66

4/27/2

No of Earth Required to Sustain

Present LifeStyle in Malaysia

COP 17 in Durban, South Africa

The United Nations Climate Change Conference 2011

The Durban Platform :

A working group will be formed in 2012 to develop a Roadmap for

developing a final agreement on combating climate change

- The agreement must be made by 2015

- Implementation starts by 2020

The European Union has committed to implementation

of a new Kyoto Agreement starting by January 2013

( US, Russia, Canada and Japan will not participate ! )

A Green Climate Fund to assist 3rd world countries to combat climate change

will be formed. Denmark, Norway and Germany has already committed to contribute.

Science : the CO2 emission curve has to break by 2015 for the 2oC target to be met

US and China is responsible for 40% of the worlds greenhouse gas emissions

The Durban Platform was signed by all nations after intense pressure from EU


43/66

4/27/2

Reducing Carbon Emission from Buildings

650 gram CO2 /kWh


44/66

4/27/2

BSEEP Context for the Demonstration Projects

The Demo projects are very important for the BSEEP programThe Demo Projects are

Proof of Concept,

Proof of Technical Feasibility

Proof of Economic Feasibility


BSEEP

BSEEP Energy Efficient Demonstration Project

Agreement between MK Land and BSEEP

February 12, 2012


Damansara Perdana

Agreements with each Demonstration Host

will be signed during January – February 2012


45/66

4/27/2

www.ien.com.my

Thanks for your attention

The BSEEP demonstration projects

Shell Shared Service Centre @ lot P125,cyberjaya

LEED Gold Certified

1st in Malaysia


46/66

4/27/2


KLIA 2

Presentation at NSC Meeting 29th March 2012 :

1. Overview of Low Carbon Buildings in an Overall Energy Context

NSC meeting

29 March 2012


Component 3 EE Financing Capacity Improvements


Component 1 Institutional Capacity Development


2. Existing Low Carbon in Malaysia

3. Work program for the coming 12 months for Components 1 – 5

4. Economy, allocation of budget for hardware and computer software

5. Q&A


47/66

4/27/2

Project Executive

Finance AssistantCommunication Assistant


48/66

4/27/2




49/66

4/27/2

Building Energy Index (without Solar PV)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450

Energy Effic iency Index (kWh/m2/year)

C u m u l a t i v e p e r c e n t i l

Malaysia

(41 officebuildings)

Singapore(95 office

buildings)

ST Diamond (2010)65 kWh/m2 year

LEO (2004)100 kWh/m2 year

GEO (2007)65 kWh/m2 year

Source of chart : EAEF Project 64

Project leader: Energy Sustainabilty Unit, Singapore, 2006

Mean ~ 210 kWh/m2

year


Building Energy Index (with Solar PV)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450



Malaysia

(41 office

buildings)

Singapore

(95 office

buildings)






Mean ~ 210 kWh/m2year



50/66

4/27/2

Advantages of Green Buildings


A LEED Gold Building, the Tangible Benefits

50%60%

50%

2 ~

16%

65%

Waste Water Energy CO2

Productivity



51/66

4/27/2

ManilaJakarta

BangkokKuala Lumpur

There is an urgent need to accelerate the uptake of low carbon buildings

Low Carbon/Zero Carbon Buildings can be built with Today‟s Technologies

BSEEP targets to make low carbon buildings standard in Malaysia by 2015

The objective with the BESEEP demonstration program is todemonstrate that significant energy savings can be achieved withprojects that are technically and economically feasible

Design Feasibility : Buildings can be designed so that energy consumption is

reduced and indoor comfort is improved using appropriate design features in the

façade and the roof, and using appropriate building materials in the façade and

the roof. All necessary building materials are available locally, and most are

locally produced.


52/66

4/27/2

Technical feasibility : The M&E systems of the building can be designed

and appropriate components can be selected to achieve significant

savings on energy consumption and significant improvements on indoor

comfort in the building. All necessary components and systems areavailable locally, and some are locally produced.

Reduction of Energy Consumption in OfficesWhere can the savings be achieved? Opportunities Obstacles

Plug LoadsSave 30 – 50 %

Using EE computers

Lack of awareness on the magnitude of IT

power consumption.

LightingUse daylight and solar control glazing

50 – 90 % reduction

( EE fixtures and daylight use )

Expensive glazing.

Lack of knowledge on daylight design in the

tropics ( heat and glare ).

CoolingSave 50 – 80 %

Reducing the load,

Improve efficiency ( COP ) of chiller

Lack of knowledge on chiller sizing.

Lack of knowledge regarding what the heat

loads are.

Fan Energy 50 – 80 % reductionLack of awareness on low pressure duct design

and efficient fan design management.

http://rds.yahoo.com/S=96062883/K=Energy+Efficient+LIGHT+BULB/v=2/SID=w/l=IVI/*-http:/www.goholistic.co.uk/images/9w_low_energy.jpg


53/66

4/27/2

Economic feasibility : The extra costs for achieving a low carbon

footprint are low compared to the savings on energy consumption. The

economic payback period will be in the range of 5 – 10 years, based on

today‟s low subsidized electricity prices. At world market energy costs,

for the Government, the payback period is 3 – 5 years.

Significant increases in electricity costs are expected over the years

until 2015, where the Government has announced that natural gas for

electricity production will be sold at the world market price.

Life Cycle Energy Costs

Developers and Quantity Surveyers

To demonstrate that energy efficient buildings

are commercially and technically viable,

and that energy efficient green buildings

is the better option compared to a grey building,

as green buildings are more attractive in the marketplace

and will retain a higher value than grey buildings.

The Target groups for the BSEEP Demonstration Program - 1


54/66

4/27/2

Clients and tenants

To demonstrate that energy efficient green buildings are viable in the

marketplace, that such buildings and facilities can be requested, and thatthe extra costs regarding purchase or lease are very minimal.

To demonstrate that energy efficient green buildings are more healthy and

that people working in low carbon buildings are more productive and happy

on their work.


MK Land on Study Tour in Freiburg Germany

Architects and engineers

To demonstrate that the technologies and design strategies to achieve energy

efficient buildings are available in Malaysia. For architects the crucial value is to

demonstrate energy efficient architecture and to demonstrate what really makes the

architecture energy efficient and green.

For the M&E engineers to become familiar with what it takes to make a building low

carbon. For both architects and engineers to demonstrate that a successful and

feasible design can be achieved through integrated design development with a

relatively limited list of crucial design elements.


Two Office Buildings in Damansara Heights


55/66

4/27/2

Investors and bankers

To demonstrate that low carbon buildings are technically sound and

commercially viable, that green low carbon buildings are viable investment

objects that will prevail economically compared to grey buildings.


Government and Legislation

To demonstrate that energy efficient buildings with a carbon footprint 40 –

60% lower than today are economically and technically feasible, and that

this building standard can be implemented as the standard in the Building

by Laws towards the end of BESEEP program in year 2015.



56/66

4/27/2

Commitments from the Demo Host

Commitments from BSEEP

What is in it for me ?

The objectives of the BSEEP demonstration projects

Financially, Strategically and Technically

What‟s in it for the Demonstration Hosts ?

To lead the way

To Walk the Talk

GoM buildings :To Demonstrate the commitment towards Green Buildings

Private Sector : To champion energy efficient green buildings in Malaysia

To provide the showcases

The KL Eco City


57/66

4/27/2

• Good daylight conditions

• Lower energy consumption ~ lower running cost

• Good and healthy indoor climate

• Enhanced productivity

• Less medical leave

• Green image for marketing

• Green technologies are visible

and state-of-the-art

Benefits for occupants in a green and energy efficient building

BSEEP

Energy Efficient Green Buildings in Malaysia

Design - Performance - Economy

Documentation

Hard Copy

Soft Copy

Websites


58/66

4/27/2

Design targets regarding energy efficiency

The BSEEP program needs to push the standard for energy efficiency and low carbon

footprint in buildings in Malaysia significantly. The time for small steps has passed.

Malaysia has committed to a reduction in the Carbon Emission Intensity by 40% from

2005 until 2020, and the building sector has to deliver to achieve this target.

Based on experiences with finalized and ongoing projects at IEN Consultants,

we believe that the following performance targets for the BSEEP

Demonstration projects are appropriate and feasible :

New non-domestic buildings ( office buildings) : reduce the Energy Indexfrom typically 220 kWh/m2year to 90 kWh/m2year, a reduction of 60%.

Building Energy Index (without Solar PV)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450



Malaysia

(41 office

buildings)

Singapore

(95 office

buildings)






Mean ~ 220 kWh/m2year


59/66

4/27/2

Existing non-domestic buildings ( office buildings) : Reduce the energyconsumption by 40 - 50%, depending on the actual building.

New housing and existing housing : A reduction of the energyconsumption of at least 50% to be achieved, including the use of energyefficient appliances for the kitchen.

The target will be a Zero Carbon building if solar PV is applied for low rise

housing ( bungalows, semi-D‟s and link houses) where there is enough

roof space for PV.


60/66

4/27/2

Implementation schedule for a demonstration project

The implementation schedule for a BSEEP Demo Project :

2011 – 2012 : Design input during Concept Design and design development

- Assist in implementation of the design targets regarding energy efficiency

2012 – 2014 : Construction

2014 - 2015 : Monitoring , evaluation and documentation

- Document the energy performance and the Indoor Air Quality

Deliverables for a demonstration project

Design report for Concept Design

Design report for the building as built

Commissioning Report

Energy Performance of the Demonstration Project

Brochure on the Showcase Demonstration Building

BSEEP

BSEEP Energy Efficient Demonstration Project

Design Report for the as built building

xxxxxx , 2014


Damansara Perdana


61/66

4/27/2

Commitments from BESEEP to the Demo project projects

Design input regarding energy efficiency – Coaching of the Design Team

Design input during Concept Design and design development

Input regarding façade design, daylight design) Provide check list for energy efficient equipment

Computer evaluation of energy consumption

Provide design input needed for BMS system for energy monitoring

Follow up during detailed design

Work with the M&E engineer during commissioning of the building

Implement a monitoring and evaluation program to document the actual

energy performance of the building

Cooling

Fans and pumps

Lighting

Small power

Other electricity loads

The client will be part of the promotion program for exemplar EE buildings.

Commitments from the Demo Project Hosts to BESEEP

Demonstrate an exemplar energy efficient building with ambitious energy targets

Present a design team that is capable and committed

to implement a showcase energy efficient building

Provide access to the building for implementation of a Post Occupancy Survey

Integrate the necessary energy monitoring and documentation systems

in the BMS system as per input from BSEEP

Provide access to the building for the monitoring and evaluation program

Implement an exemplar building with a low energy index


62/66

4/27/2

The Cost of 1 kW:

New Power Plant Investment:

Energy Efficient Building Investment:

Euro / kW = 800

Euro / kW = 200

Macro-economic evaluation on Energy Efficiency in Buildings

What is good for the country, what is cheapest for the country ?

When you invest in an energy efficient building, then

1. Energy Savings ( kWh‟s) are Achieved2. Electricity Peak Load ( kW‟s) is Reduced

NSC meeting

29 March 2012

10 GW

12 GW

14 GW

Electricity Load Curve, Peninsular Malaysia

8.00 am 6.00 pm

NSC meeting

29 March 2012


63/66

4/27/2

Saving GW‟s is Cheaper than Building GW‟s

NSC meeting

29 March 2012

10 GW

12 GW

14 GW

Electricity Load Curve, Peninsular Malaysia, TNB 2010

The Power of Energy Efficiency

Energy Efficiency 3GW30 billion RM not invested

NSC meeting

29 March 2012


64/66

4/27/2

NSC meeting

29 March 2012


1. Develop Guidebook on EE in Buildings

Energy Efficiency in Architecture ( “ passive design”

Energy Efficiency in Mechanical and Electrical Systems (“active design”

Integrated Energy Design of Buildings

3. Develop a Simplified EE Design Tool

2. Implement Capacity Building Courses on EE Building Design

Architects

Engineers

Developers

Civil Servants 2012

4. Energy Efficiency in Housing, design and user guide


NSC meeting

29 March 2012

Component 3 EE Financing Capacity Improvements

Implement a Study on existing financing and subsidy mechanisms

Implement Awareness Seminars on existing financing and subsidy mechanisms

Implement a Study on the Macro-Economic Benefits of EE in Buildings

2012

Develop proposal for new incentives and financing schemes

Implement Awareness Seminars on existing financing and subsidy mechanisms

Including promotion of the ESCO financing model for energy retrofit



65/66

4/27/2

NSC meeting

29 March 2012


2012

Façade design, orientation, choice of materials

Airtightness of buildings, recuperation on ventilation air

Design of ventilation and cooling system

Design of lighting system, integration of daylight design

Conduct a study on an improved MS 1525 regarding the key design criteria


NSC meeting

29 March 2012


2012

Façade design, orientation, choice of materials

Airtightness of buildings, recuperation on ventilation air

Design of ventilation and cooling system

Design of lighting system, integration of daylight design

Training Courses on building energy codes : 5 courses

( Penang, KL, Johor, Sabah and Sarawak )

Conduct a study on an improved MS 1525 regarding the key design criteria

Extensive training courses on EE Building Design

Development of MS1525:2014

with the Malaysian Building Industry and Regulatory Bodies



66/66

4/27/2

• A low Carbon Building is a building that uses less electricity, because less electricity

consumption means less CO2 emissions at the power plant to produce electricity.

• A coal fired power plant emits 1000 gram CO2 to produce one kWh of electricity

• A gas fired power plant emits only 500 gram CO2 to produce one kWh of electricity

•With the Malaysian fuel mix for power production, 650 gram CO2 to produce one kWh o

electricity

•If the electricity consumption of a building is reduced by 50%, then the carbon

emissions related to that building is also reduced by 50%. The carbon footprint is

reduced by 50%.

The road to Low Carbon Buildings


bseep-slide presentation-poul erik kristensen-energy efficiency in new buildings

Documents