broadcasting competition and programming costs david genesove hebrew university of jerusalem and...

4
Broadcasting Competition and Programming Costs David Genesove Hebrew University of Jerusalem and CEPR Comments by Lisa George Department of Economics Hunter College and the Graduate School, CUNY

Upload: earl-carson

Post on 27-Dec-2015

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Broadcasting Competition and Programming Costs David Genesove Hebrew University of Jerusalem and CEPR Comments by Lisa George Department of Economics Hunter

Broadcasting Competition and

Programming Costs

David Genesove Hebrew University of Jerusalem and CEPR

Comments by Lisa GeorgeDepartment of EconomicsHunter College and the Graduate School, CUNY

Page 2: Broadcasting Competition and Programming Costs David Genesove Hebrew University of Jerusalem and CEPR Comments by Lisa George Department of Economics Hunter

2

Overview Competing Effects of Competition on Program Quality

More Firms → More Competition for Listeners → Incentives to Attract Listeners → Higher Quality Programs (Direct Effect)

Fewer Firms → Higher Ad Revenue per Listener → Incentives to Attract Listeners → Higher Quality Programs (Indirect Effect)

Dominant Effect Depends on Disutility of Distance / Disutility of Ads Theoretical Contribution

Extension of Salop’s Circular City Extend Choi (2006), Armstrong & Weeds (2006) to Non-Linear

Transport Cost Result: When Transport Cost a Super-Unitary Power of Distance

(targeting extra-important), Quality Increases with N and Dominates Ad Effect

Empirical Framework Goal: Estimate Effect of Concentration on Quality (Overall &

Conditional on Ad Revenue) Setting: Expansion of AM Radio in 1940’s Data

• Quality = Programming Cost• Station Advertising Revenue • Concentration = Number of Stations

Estimation Strategy• Instruments: Concurrent & Lagged Economic Growth• FCC Freeze – Concentration Differenced Out• Wartime Entry – Exogenous

Page 3: Broadcasting Competition and Programming Costs David Genesove Hebrew University of Jerusalem and CEPR Comments by Lisa George Department of Economics Hunter

3

Results

Effect of Concentration on Quality (Overall and Conditional) OLS – Both Zero IV – Overall effect large but statistically insignificant IV-- Conditional effect is zero.

Effect of Concentration on Ad Revenue OLS – Zero IV Positive but weakly significant

Results suggest convex distance function (decreasing marginal disutility of distance)

Programming expenditures sensitive to market size

Page 4: Broadcasting Competition and Programming Costs David Genesove Hebrew University of Jerusalem and CEPR Comments by Lisa George Department of Economics Hunter

4

Comments

Useful, Practical Model Paper Structure

Market for Talent -- Theoretical and Empirical Aside Free Entry Equilibrium – Theoretical Aside Empirical Road Map

• Graphs of stations, revenue, programming?• Describe what is estimated & why (estimation variables vs.

structural variables)• Separate OLS & IV?

• Need to consider estimation challenges & biases along with data (Section 3 & 4)

• Interpret coefficients alone and in terms of structural equation Other Estimation Issues

Relationship between program expenditure & quality over time?

Restricted 1944 sample? Network Shows – All Stations? Multi-station firms? Multiplication Factor – 2.5