board presentation march 3, 2020 - dejong-richter · 2020-03-04 · march 3, 2020. cabell county...

CABELL COUNTY SCHOOLS COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES PLAN

BOARD PRESENTATION

CABELL COUNTY SCHOOLSCOMPREHENSIVE EDUCATIONAL

FACILITY PLANNING

MARCH 3, 2020

CABELL COUNTY SCHOOLS COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES PLAN 1

A G E N D A

• Presentation:

Review the CEFP process and items

completed to date.

• Background Information

• Review Options / Results

• Recommendations

• Next Steps


Vision and Goals• Student Outcomes

• Equity• Collaboration• Sustainability

Data• Enrollment• Migration

• Capacity & Utilization• Facility Condition• Facility Adequacy• Operational Costs

Stakeholder Voice• Students• Parents

• Community• Instructors

• Administrators

Decision-Maker Engagement

• Communications• Multimedia

• Community Meetings

C E F PGOALS

• Modern, flexible facilities that enable collaborative learning and positive student outcomes.

• Equitably allocated resources informed by data, local priorities, and student voice.

• Sustainable funding for school facilities and programs.

• Coordinated implementation of projects with transparency and accountability.


C E F PPOTENTIAL OUTCOMES

• Repair/upgrade/expand facilities• Replace facilities• Repurpose facilities• Construct new facilities • New / alternative funding sources• Expand/replicate successful programs• New regional specialty / magnet programs• Attendance policy change / enforcement• Grade reconfiguration• Attendance boundary adjustments• Feeder pattern realignment• School consolidations


Plan Schedule

C E F P


T I M E L I N E

September October November December January February March


F U T U R E S C O N F E R E N C ERESULTS

On September 26, 2019, a Futures Conference was held to discuss and collect feedback from the community regarding the future of education in Cabell County. Items discussed included emerging trends, technology, and facility needs.

Approximately 150 community members, staff, parents, students, and administration from Cabell County Schools gathered at the St. Mary Conference Center.


F U T U R E S C O N F E R E N C ERESULTS

Students of 2050 Schools of 2050 Careers of 2050150 Cabell County community members responses are below:

Common themes from the Cabell County community members were:• Students of 2050 will be problem solvers, technology savvy, with a global awareness

• Focus on personal interaction/communication• Schools of 2050 will be open & flexible, technology focused, with many virtual learning opportunities

• Teachers as guides and mentors with information rather than the source of information• Careers of 2050 will be medically and educationally focused with technology changing the way we work

• Some careers of 2050 have not been invented, yet


E D U C AT I O N A L F R A M E W O R KRESULTS

On November 21, 2019, a Community Meeting was held (one meeting at each high school) to discuss and collectfeedback from the community regarding the future of education in Cabell County. Items discussed includedfacility adequacy, facility age, and CTE programming.

After a short presentation from Cooperative Strategies, Scott Leopold, participants were asked to complete aquestionnaire individually as well as in small groups. The groups discussed the same questions that wereposed to individuals and had to discuss the items to come to a consensus.

*Meeting at Cabell Midland High School *Meeting at Huntington High School



• Update all facilities• Make facilities equitable/safe• Small class sizes are preferred• Special need students need more resources/considerations

Common themes from the Cabell County community members were:

*Samples of Educational Framework Results



Common themes from the Cabell County community members were:

OTHER:

• Can we keep low numbers so that student needs can be met?

• Equitable distribution of Special Education enrollment is essential.

• Handicap accessibility for students’, staff, and visitors.

• Keep schools inside of communities and keep small class sizes.

• Planning for the future growth of the new school being built and not just for what you have today.

• Redistricting at the schools.• Small school and small class sizes.• Spend money in the best way for quality.• The school is actual trash.• value added to the neighborhood.


BACKGROUND INFORMATION

TRIWAY LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

AT A GLANCE

Ona ESCentral Office

Cox Landing ESMeadows ESSalt Rock ES

B-ville Bus GarageMilton ESAltizer ES

Highlawn ES

Davis Creek ESHite-Saunders ES

Milton Bus Garage

CCC Tech CenterSpring Hill ES

Cabell Midland HSHuntington HSCentral City ESGuyandotte ES

Village of Barboursville ESBarboursville MS

Martha ES

Milton MSHuntington MS

Southside ESMilton Pre-K

Huntington East MSExplorer Academy

CL Bus GarageCulloden ES

Nichols ES


E N R O L L M E N T

Source: Hanovoer 2018 Source: SBA

• Overall Districtwide enrollment is project to remain flat to slightly declining.

Village of Barboursville Elementary is projected to continue to grow in enrollment.


I D E N T I F I E D FA C I L I T Y N E E D S

Identified as a need within 10 yearsRecently completed

School Year BuiltEstimated

CostsNew HVAC

New HVAC Controls

Sprinkler System

Roof Replacement

Floor Tile Replacement

Portable Classroom

Replacement

Window Replacement

Safe School Entrance

Not ADA Compliant

Elementary SchoolsAltizer Elementary 1951 $2,160,000Central City Elementary 1998 $2,230,000Cox Landing Elementary 1939 $1,350,000Culloden Elementary 2016 $1,610,000Davis Creek Elementary 1958 $1,630,000Guyandotte Elementary 1999 $1,500,000Highlawn Elementary 2019 $0Hite-Saunders Elementary 1972 $2,580,000Martha Elementary 2008 $2,100,000Meadows Elementary 1939 $2,000,000Milton Elementary 1950 $4,500,000Nichols Elementary 1963 $1,600,000Ona Elementary 1936 $1,840,000Salt Rock Elementary 1939 $2,600,000Southside Elementary 2009 $2,100,000Spring Hill Elementary 1981 $2,250,000Village of Barboursville Elementary 2002 $2,600,000

Middle SchoolsBarboursville Middle 2008 $4,380,000Huntington East Middle 2013 $0Huntington Middle 2010 $0Milton Middle 2009 $3,400,000

High SchoolsCabell Midland High 1994 $12,050,000Huntington High 1996 $11,200,000

Other SchoolsCabell Couty CTE Center 1981 $5,000,000Explorer Academy 2014 $0


A D D R E S S I N G FA C I L I T Y N E E D S

• Not all facility needs will require a bond program.

• Smaller projects like elementary HVAC or roofing projections can be funded with dollars that the

District can allocate out of the general fund.

• Larger projects like High School HVAC replacements, major renovations, and additions will likely

require bond dollars.

• Just because you do not see a specific project outline in an option does not mean it will not get

funded in the next 10 years (example, several facilities has received safe school entry upgrades

outside of the 2010 CEFP recently).

• The options focus on major projects that would likely require bond dollars.


C E F P G U I D E L I N E SSBA FORM 166

• These square footage

allocations determine building

size (square footage) based on

enrollment, the higher the

enrollment, the lower the

square footage allocation per

student.

• It is less expensive to fewer

larger schools than more

smaller schools.


C A P I TA L C O S T S

• Costs developed are based on square foot

costs provided by the SBA. Costs considered

“Rough Order of Magnitude” for comparison

purposes.

• Projects that require land acquisition or

extensive site-prep have additional dollars

allocated ($3.5 million).

Renovation Costs - $200 - 225 / sq. ft.

Building Type Cost / Sq. Ft.

Source

Elementary School $307 SBA

Middle School $302 SBA

High School $300 SBA

CTE Center $400 Estimate

New Construction Costs


OPTIONS AND COMMUNITY FEEDBACK


Results

19

In total, there were 72 individual comments and1,517 online questionnaires collected.A cross-section of the Cabell County communitywas represented in the results with respondentsself-affiliating with every school. Some commonthemes from the questionnaires include:

• Restroom facilities need improved and renovated• Athletic fields being equitable across the county• People seem to be against the consolidation of schools• Student safety; both physical and health safety were a

concern• HVAC issues at various schools is not equitable as well as

flooring, roofs, electrical, and other systems.


A. Renovate/Addition

Altizer Elementary

C. Consolidate into Guyandotte (reno/addition at Guyandotte)

D. Consolidate into new Davis Creek/Altizer, site TBD

B. Deferred Upgrades

Existing Issues:• Roof needs replaced• No fire suppression system• HVAC needs replaced• Floor tile needs replaced• Additional classrooms to replace portables

Other considerations:• Alternative D can be constructed to

include part of VOBE to alleviate overcrowding

Options Costs

$15.0mil

$21.0mil

$2.16mil

$7.20mil

Alternatives (Includes other projects) Costs

20

The colored squares indicate current elementary school locations, the dots represent student locations and correspond to the school color. The shaded background colors denote the current boundaries.


Altizer Elementary - Results

21

Recommendation: Renovation / Addition


A. Replace On-site or acquire property nearby

Cox Landing Elementary

C. Redistrict to increase enrollment


Existing Issues:• No Safe School entry• Not ADA compliant• No fire suppression• HVAC needs replaced

Other considerations:• KYOVA is currently studying a bridge

across the Ohio River in this area, this may impact future enrollment and traffic.

• Deferred upgrades will not address ADA issues.

Options Costs

$0.0

$1.35mil

$11.6mil


22



Cox Landing Elementary - Results

23

Recommendation: Replace On-site / If ADA can be addressed in a renovation, consider renovation


Davis Creek Elementary

C. Consolidate into new Davis Creek/Altizer, site TBD

E. Establish new grade configuration with VOBE (build new PK-2 on a location TBD, convert VOBE to 3-5). The expanded boundary will serve VOBE + Davis Creek.


Existing Issues:• No Safe School entry• No fire suppression• HVAC needs replaced, requires electrical upgrade. • Playground & lower level flooding

Other considerations:• Martha has had recent renovations and is built for expansion.• Alternative D can be constructed to include part of VOBE to

alleviate overcrowding.• The majority Davis Creek students that live within the Davis Creek

boundary are in close proximity to VOBE.

Options Costs

$21.0mil

$20.4mil

$1.63mil


A. Replace on new site, TBD $16.1mil

D. Consolidate into new Davis Creek/Hite-Saunders, site TBD

$21.2mil

F. Consolidate Davis Creek into Martha, Martha addition

$5.9mil

24



Davis Creek Elementary - Results

25

Recommendation: Replace on a new site TBD


A. Replace On-site

Hite-Saunders Elementary

C. Replace on site, consolidating Meadows


Existing Issues:• No fire suppression• HVAC needs replaced• Additional classrooms to replace portables• Window need replaced• Roof needs replaced

Other considerations:• Constructing a new facility on the current site will

require additional site work due to terrain.

Options Costs

$21.1mil

$2.58mil

$13.4mil


D. Consolidate into new Hite-Saunders/Meadows, site TBD

$21.1mil

E. Replace on site, consolidating Davis Creek $21.2mil

F. Consolidate into new Hite-Saunders/Davis Creek, site TBD

$21.2mil

26



Hite-Saunders Elementary - Results

27

Recommendation: Deferred Upgrades


A. Replace On-site

Meadows Elementary

C. Consolidate into new Meadows/Hite-Saunders on Hite-Saunders site

D. Consolidate into new Meadows/Hite-Saunders, site TBD


Existing Issues:• School is not ADA compliant• No fire suppression• HVAC needs replaced• Heavy traffic in area

Other considerations:• If the facility is replaced on-site, students will need to

be served at another site for at least one school year.• Deferred upgrades will not address ADA issues.

Options Costs

$21.1mil

$21.1mil

$2.00mil

$16.3mil


28



Meadows Elementary - Results

29

Recommendation: Replace On-site, set back from current location


A. Replace On-site (current ES site)

Milton Elementary

D. Redistrict with Culloden to alleviate crowding

C. Deferred Upgrades

Existing Issues:• No safe school entry• HVAC needs replaced, electrical upgrade

required.• Flooding concerns• Window replacement

Other considerations:• New facility can be constructed on

adjacent sports field (current ES site)• Can incorporate PK into new facility• Flood wall planned by US Army Corps

Engineers

Options Costs

$0

$4.50mil

$22.6mil

Alternatives (combined with an option) Costs

B. Replace on current PK site $22.6mil

30



Milton Elementary - Results

31

Recommendation: Replace On-site


A. Significant renovation on site

Nichols Elementary

C. Consolidate into new Nichols/Ona, site TBD

D. Consolidate into new Nichols/Ona on Ona site


Existing Issues:• No safe school entry• No fire suppression system• HVAC needs replaced• Windows need replaced

Other considerations:• If Nichols is not utilized as a school, the

land returns to the Nichols family

Options Costs

$23.8mil

$20.3mil

$1.60mil

$5.60mil


32



Nichols Elementary - Results

33

Recommendation: Renovation


A. Replace on site

Ona Elementary

C. Consolidate into new Ona/Nichols, site TBD


Existing Issues:• No safe school entry• No fire suppression system• HVAC needs replaced• School not ADA compliant

Other considerations:• If the facility is replaced on-site, students will

need to be served at another site for at least one school year.

• Deferred upgrades will not address ADA issues.

Options Costs

$23.8mil

$1.84mil

$13.6mil


D. Consolidate into new Ona/Nichols on Ona site

$20.3mil

34



Ona Elementary - Results

35

Recommendation: Replace On-site


A. Reduce enrollment through redistricting

Village of Barboursville Elementary

B. Establish new grade configuration with Davis Creek (build new PK-2 on a location TBD, convert VOBE to 3-5). The expanded boundary will serve VOBE + Davis Creek.

Existing Issues:• Overcrowding• Projected increasing enrollment

Other considerations:• The majority Davis Creek students that

live within the Davis Creek boundary are in close proximity to VOBE.

Options Costs

$20.4mil

$0.00


C. Redistrict into new Altizer/Davis Creek $23.0mil

36



Village of Barboursville Elementary - Results

37

Recommendation: Deferred Upgrades / Redistricting to relieve over-crowding


A. Replace on site

Career & Technical Education Center (CTE)

B. Renovate/addition on site

Existing Issues:• No safe school entry• Facility limits programs• Facility is overcrowded

Other considerations: ADA issues have recently have been identified, some of which are currently being addressed.

Options Costs

$35.4mil

$64.2mil

C. Deferred Upgrades $5.0mil

38


Career & Technical Education Center (CTE) - Results

39

Recommendation: Renovation / Addition


A. Acquire land for MS football field

Middle School

Existing Issues:• Currently, there is no football field for

Huntington MS & Huntington East MS

Other considerations:• The site will be shared between

Huntington MS & Huntington East MS

Options Costs

$4.5milHuntington East Middle School

Huntington Middle School

40


Middle School - Results

41

Recommendation: Construct on a new site (Location TBD)


High School

Renovations at Huntington HS

Renovations at Cabell Midland HS

Existing Issues:• Both high schools are approaching 30

years in age and will be requiring renovations.

Costs for Reference

$27.3mil

$28.3mil

Cabell Midland High School

Huntington High School• Safe school entrances

• Auditorium updates

Priorities?

• Additional CTE spaces

• Cafeteria/Kitchen

• Restrooms

• HVAC system partial upgrade

42


High School - Results

Huntington High School

43

Cabell Midland

Huntington


High School - Results

44

Recommendation: Prioritize Safe-school entrances, then auditorium upgrades, then media centers, all others address as needed


RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY


Recommendations – Elementary Schools

46

School Year Built ActionHigh

SupportSupport

Low Support

No Support No Opinion Cost Project Priority Additional Committee Comments

Elementary SchoolsAltizer Elementary 1951 Renovation / Addition 37% 22% 6% 6% 29% 7,200,000$ Moderate - HighCentral City Elementary 1998 Deferred Upgrades 2,230,000$ Low (Address as needed)

Cox Landing Elementary 1939 Replace On-Site 31% 22% 11% 9% 27% 11,600,000$ Low (Address as needed) If possible to address ADA, consider renovation of the existing building

Culloden Elementary 2016 Deferred Upgrades 1,610,000$ Low (Address as needed)

Davis Creek Elementary 1958 Replace on new site TBD 26% 16% 13% 18% 27% 16,100,000$ High Consider constructing larger to relieve VOBE through redistricting

Explorer Academy 2014 NoneGuyandotte Elementary 1999 Deferred Upgrades 1,500,000$ Low (Address as needed)Highlawn Elementary 2019 NoneHite-Saunders Elementary 1959 Deferred Upgrades 16% 21% 13% 21% 30% 2,600,000$ High Window upgrades are a high priority Martha Elementary 2008 Deferred Upgrades 2,100,000$ Low (Address as needed)

Meadows Elementary 1939 Replace On-Site 25% 19% 13% 16% 27% 16,300,000$ High If replaced on-site, school needs to be set back further from existing intersection

Milton Elementary 1950 Replace On-Site 29% 20% 11% 13% 26% 22,600,000$ High Consider keeping Pre-K separate Nichols Elementary 1963 Renovation 40% 18% 8% 11% 23% 5,600,000$ ModerateOna Elementary 1936 Replace On-Site 33% 19% 10% 13% 24% 13,600,000$ Moderate - HighSalt Rock Elementary 1939 Deferred Upgrades 2,600,000$ Low (Address as needed)Southside Elementary 2009 Deferred Upgrades 2,100,000$ Low (Address as needed)Spring Hill Elementary 1981 Deferred Upgrades 2,250,000$ Low (Address as needed)Village of Barboursville Elementary 2002 Deferred Upgrades / Redistrict 44% 18% 6% 10% 21% 2,600,000$ High

Committee Consensus

Not included in survey







Not included in surveyNot included in survey


Recommendations – Middle Schools

47


SupportSupport

Low Support


Middle SchoolsBarboursville Middle 2008 Deferred Upgrades 4,380,000$ Low (Address as needed)Huntington East Middle 2013 Deferred Upgrades -$ Low (Address as needed)Huntington Middle 2010 Deferred Upgrades -$ Low (Address as needed)New Football Field (Location TBD) - Construct on New Site (TBD 34% 25% 10% 15% 17% 4,500,000$ ModerateMilton Middle 2009 Deferred Upgrades 3,400,000$ Low (Address as needed)

Not included in surveyNot included in surveyNot included in survey

Committee Consensus



Recommendations – High Schools

48


SupportSupport

Low Support


High SchoolsCabell Midland High 1994 Renovations 48% 27% 11% 6% 8% 28,300,000$ Priorities High Moderate Low No Opinion

16% 31% 41% 12% 4,800,000$ Moderate73% 12% 6% 8% 3,000,000$ High27% 36% 22% 16% 2,000,000$ Low (Address as needed)31% 41% 18% 11% 2,000,000$ Low (Address as needed)47% 30% 13% 8% 2,000,000$ Low (Address as needed)52% 30% 8% 11% 11,500,000$ Low (Address as needed)

3,000,000$ Moderate - Low

Huntington High 1996 Renovations 39% 28% 12% 10% 12% 27,300,000$ Priorities High Moderate Low No Opinion

12% 29% 38% 21% 4,800,000$ Moderate62% 11% 8% 19% 3,000,000$ High22% 30% 23% 25% 2,000,000$ Low (Address as needed)23% 35% 21% 22% 2,000,000$ Low (Address as needed)36% 27% 16% 21% 2,000,000$ Low (Address as needed)41% 27% 11% 21% 10,500,000$ Low (Address as needed)

3,000,000$ Moderate - LowHVAC System Partial UpgradeLibrary Media Center Prevelent in comments

Prevelent in comments

Auditorium UpgradesSafe School EntrancesAdditional CTE SpacesCafeteria / Kitchen

Committee Consensus

Auditorium UpgradesSafe School Entrances

Restrooms

Additional CTE SpacesCafeteria / KitchenRestroomsHVAC System Partial UpgradeLibrary Media Center


Recommendations – High Schools

49


SupportSupport

Low Support


Other SchoolsCabell Couty CTE Center 1981 Renovation / Addition 31% 26% 8% 11% 24% 35,400,000$ High More growth / interest is expected for this

Committee Consensus


N E X T S T E P S

• File CEFP paperwork with the SBA


QUESTIONS

board presentation march 3, 2020 - dejong-richter · 2020-03-04 · march 3, 2020. cabell county...

Documents