biodiversity research based on local flora approach … · biodiversity research based on local...

27
BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH BASED ON LOCAL FLORA APPROACH IN RUSSIAN ARCTIC Arctic Change 2014, 8-12 December 2014, Ottawa, Canada Olga Khitun 1 , Tatjana Koroleva 1 , Svetlana Chinenko 1 , Vladik Petrovsky 1 , Andrei Zverev 2 Elena Pospelova 3 , Igor Pospelov 3 1 Komarov Botanical Institute, Saint Petersburg, Russia 2 Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia 3 Nature Reserve “Taimyrsky”

Upload: others

Post on 28-May-2020

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH BASED ON

LOCAL FLORA APPROACH

IN RUSSIAN ARCTIC

Arctic Change 2014,

8-12 December 2014, Ottawa, Canada

Olga Khitun1, Tatjana Koroleva1, Svetlana

Chinenko1, Vladik Petrovsky1, Andrei Zverev2,

Elena Pospelova3, Igor Pospelov3

1 Komarov Botanical Institute, Saint Petersburg, Russia 2 Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia 3 Nature Reserve “Taimyrsky”

Criteria of homogeneity = constancy of species composition in similar habitats throughout the area of the CF. Criteria of elementarity = absence of any floristic boundaries within the area under investigation. Species richness of CF depends on the characteristic for the area set of habitats and historical factors. The size of the area should be big enough to reveal all possible habitat types and can vary in different geographic zones (Tolmatchev,1974; Schmidt, 1972; Yurtsev, 1975). For the Arctic it is equal ca 100 km2 (Tolmatchev, 1970; Yurtsev, 1975) in lowland parts and ca. 300 km2 – in mountainous parts, in taiga it is an area of ca 600 km2.

“Concrete flora” (A.I.Tolmatchev 1931) =

a minimal floristic unit really existing in nature

which is natural and comparable. “Concrete

or elementary flora (CF) is homogenous

enough, differentiated only ecologically flora

of a limited part of the Earth surface”.

LOCAL FLORA (LF) VS CONCRETE FLORA (CF)

Tolmachev distinguished between concrete (or elementary) flora and the area selected for the revealing of it: area-minimum of CF.

Yurtsev: in the field we perform a selective floristic sampling of some locality = “sample of floristic situation in a geographic point” = “ flora of vicinity of a geographic point” = “local flora” (LF).

A sample of floristic

situation=local

flora, usually equal to

area-minimum of CF

PF

In practice, to study of CF/LF

= to examine the area around

base camp by radial routes

about 6-7 km long during 2-3

weeks.

We compile species lists for

all habitats existing in the

area.

Information of species

PF= partial flora= flora of a habitat

Ecological amplitude

Abun-

dance

Euritopic Hemi-

euritopic

Hemi-

stenotopic

Stenotopic

Common

habitats

Rare

habitats

Alwa

ys

Spo-

radic

Always Spora

-dic

Alwa

ys

Spora-

dic

Cons-

tant

Non-

const

Con

s-

tant

Non-

const

Copiosus V V IV IV III II III II II I

Sparsus IV IV III III III II III I I I

Solitarius III II II II II I II I I I

Landscape activeness (Yurtsev 1968, 1987, 1989, etc.) is

estimated on the base of 3 characters: 1) species ecological

amplitude; 2) abundance; 3) constancy in its habitats;

4) how common are the habitats where species exist in the area.

I– non active, II– low active, III- medium active, IV- high active, V–superactive

The distribution of local floras included into the network of

biodiversity monitoring sites in Russian Arctic,

Representative for the sector ( subprovince, subzone) ; Specific, unique features of

this particular landscape, presence of rare species, endemics; Situated at

boundaries of subzones, phytochoria (ecotone position); flora should be revealed

completely enough; information about distribution of each species, its activeness

Only few local floras were re-inventoried by now, results of

re-inventory are not uniform. For several sites – no changes,

for several – increase in boreal and hypoarctic species was noted

Draba oblongata

(D. groenlandica)

Was considered endemic of

Greenland and Canadian Arctic

archipelago

Study of local floras allow to get new information about distribution of species

and ro reconstruct the history of migrations.

Species which were formely considered as narrow endemics were found in local

floras remote from known previously sites.

Oxytropis wrangelii и Puccinellia colpodioides

Was considered as endemic of Wrangel Island

Gastrolychnis ostenfeldii

Was considered as endemic of NW Canada , but

was found on Wrangel isl, Chukotka and Taimyr

Calamagrostis deschampsioides (1) was mainly found along the coast of the

European part of Arctic and along Chukotka coast, now it is not yet found

only in Taimyr. Roegneria villosa (3) was considered as rare species with

isolated populations in East Siberian Arctic, now we can confirm that its

range is from Taimyr to Beringian coast

Grey icons – locations shown in the ‘Arctic Flora of USSR’, black – later findings in local floras

Scheme of floristic regionalization of the Arctic (Yurtsev et al.1978,

shorten English version Yurtsev 1994), since that - many new findings,

revision of herbarium from studied earlier local floras.

Castilleja

arctica

Yamal-Gydan

subprovince,rare

endemic, differential

Common in YA-G,

found in Taimyr and

Anabar

Lychnis

sibirica

Yamal-Gydan eastern

co-differential

Found in Kanin-

Pechora

Draba pohlei Endemic of ast

Siberian province

Found in Ural-Nov.

Zemlya subpr., co-dif

Carex

trautvetteriana,

C.williamsii

Differential for

Kharaulakh

Found in Taimyr and

Anabar-Olenek

Former status Present status Species

Taraxacum semitubulosum,

differential for Kharaulah, endem,

now found in Anabar-Olenek.

Papaver gorodkovii, was differential for

Chukchi province, found in Taimyr

Artemisia lagopus ssp.abbreviata

Co-dif Kharaulakh and Anabar-Olenek Oxytropis putoranica – endemic of Taimyr

Both Taimyr and Anabaro-Olenek

Deschampsia vodopjanoviae, Festuca jacutica, Trisetokoeleria taimyrica

Juncus longirostis, Oxytropis czekanowskii, Oxytropis tichomirovii

Taraxacum byrrangica, Taraxacum taimyrense

Taimyr subprovince Puccinellia byrrangensis,

Puccinellia gorodkovii,

Puccinellia jenissejensis,

Roegneria lenensis,

Cerastium regelii subsp.

caespitosum,

Draba taymyrensis

Oxytropis putoranica

Cortusa matthioli subsp.altaica

Dracocephalum nutans

Castilleja tenella

Claytonia joanneana

Ptarmica impatiens

Taraxacum platylepium

Anabaro-Olenek subprovince Arctopoa trautvetteri

Helictotrichon schellianum

Taraxacum semitubulosum

Potentilla lenensis

Artemisia lagopus subsp.

triniana

Artemisia lagopus ssp. abbreviata

Caragana jubata

Kharaulakh subprovince Saxifraga lactea

Spirea dahurica

Oxytropis sordida subsp.

arctolenensis

Taraxacum semitubulosum

Potentilla lenensis

Artemisia lagopus ssp. abbreviata

Caragana jubata

East Siberian Province

Both in Yana-Kolyma and Continental Chukotka

Festuca kolymensis, Oxytropis ochotensis, Oxytropis vasskovskyi,

Veronica incana

Yana-Kolyma subprovince

Arctopoa petrovskyi

Elytrigia villosa

Gorodkovia jacutica

Astragalus penduliflorus

Oxytropis middendorffii

subsp.jarovoi

Papaver stubendorfii

Androsace gorodkovii

Artemisia gmelinii

subsp.scheludjakoviae (-)

Artemisia lagopus

subsp.jarovoi

Taraxacum jacutucum (-)

Artemisia jacutica (-)

Continental Chukotka

Roegneria nepliana

Suaeda arctica

Carex sordida= C.hirta

Hedinia czukotica

Chrysosplenium alternifolium

subsp arctomontanum

Potentilla anjuica

Oxytropis middendorffii

subsp.coerulescens

Oxytropis schmorgunovii

Oxytropis sverdrupii

Plantago canescens

subsp jurtzevii

Artemisia flava

Taraxacum anadyricum

Taraxacum chaunense

Taraxacum leucocarpum

Beringian Chukotka

Botrychium pinnatum

Puccinellia beringensis

Puccinellia czukczorum

Rumex beringensis

Rumex krausei

Claytonia sarmentosa

Aconitum delphinifolium

subsp paradoxum

Anemone parviflora (-)

Papaver walpolei (-)

Aphragmus escholtzianus (-)

Arabidopsis tschuktschorum

Potentilla beringensis

Potentilla czegetunica

Oxytropis berengensis

Dodecatheon frigidum

Artemisia senjavinensis Dodecatheon frigidum

Variables studied with Russian Arctic local floras database

number of: species(=sp. richness), genera, families in local and regional floras;

mean± SE, min, max number of sp., gen., fam. for local floras of the region

percent portion of species richness of a certain local flora to species richness of

respective regional flora

mean; min; max number of species in: family,genus; number of genera in family

number and portion of single species genera and families

number and portion of differential species and genera

number of species in 5 and 10 richest families and their portion in the flora

ratio Asteraceae/Poaceae; Cyperaceae/Poaceae

composition of the richest and poorest families

ratio of different divisions of vascular plants

presence, number and portion of rare species (occur in 1-2 local floras)

number and portion of species with 100% occurrance in local floras of a

subprovince

similarity of local floras by species composition (Sørensen similarity index)

index of complexity of the taxonomic structure (Shmidt,1984)

index of autonomity (autochtonity-allochtonity) (Malyshev, 1976)

portion of woody plants species

presence and composition of trees

number and ratio of longitudinal and latitudinal groups and fractions

similarity of local floras by geographical structure

Mean species richness of

local floras in Chukotka

subprovinces varies between

273 to 346. In Yamal it is 164,

in Taymyr – 172.

The relatively high species

richness of East-Asian floras

is caused by the relief

diversity, the floras history

and close proximity of the

region to the ancient

speciation centers –

Angarida and Beringia

Typical landscape in Yamal-Gydan sector

Typical landscape in Chukotka sector

YAT study sites Local flora study sites (1970-2012)

1–southern boundary of Yamal

peninsula полуострова; 2–nor-thern

boundaries of geobotanical subzones

(I – forest-tundra; II – southern

hypoarctic tundra; III – northern

hypoarctic tundra; IV – arctic tundra);

3 – Polar circle; 4 – local flora study

sites studied by Olga Rebristaya

alone or together with Olga Khitun:

1- Сюнайсале (Сю), 2 – Хадыта

(Хд), 3 – Харангынето (Хр), 4 –

Еръяха (Ер), 5 – Лаптаяха (Ла), 6 –

Хевесе (Хе), 7 – Юрибей (Юр), 8 –

Хутыяха (Ху), 9 – Себаяха (Се), 10

– Ляккатосе (Ля), 11 –

Юрибейтояха (Ют), 12 –

Марресале (Мр), 13 –Хахаяяха

(Хх), 14 – Салетаяха (Са), 15 –

Неромаяха (Не), 16 – Нгаранато

(Нг), 17 – Бованенково (Бо), 18 –

Томбойтояха (Тм), 19 – Мантыто

(Мн), 20 – Вэнуйеуо (Вэ), 21 –

Матюйяха (Ма), 22 – Тиутей (Ти),

23 – Верхний Тамбей (ВТ), 24 –

Тирваяха (Тр), 25 – Харасавэй

(Хс), 26 – Хабейяха (Хб), 27 –

Белый (Б). Without number sites

studied by Olga Khitun only (blue

circles): 144 km, Mus Kamennui,

Yara-yakha, Bovanenkovo, Bely-west

0

50

100

150

200

250

n

o

.

o

f

s

p

c

i

e

s

Bely

Khabei

Tambei

Kharas

Matjuiykha

Vas.Dachi

Bovanenk

Tomboito

Sebayakha

Khevuse

Laptayakha

Khadata

Laborov

Sjunaisale

Species richness of Yamal local floras

Local floras from different subzones

group in clusters according to their zonal

position. 1 - LF “Ostrov Bely”, northern

variant of arctic tundra; 2 and 3 – LF

“Khabeiyakha” and “Tambei”, 4 – LF

“Kharasavei” – southern variant of arctic

tundra. (Low level of connection of “O.

Bely” explains by big difference in

species richness with other floras). 5– 9 -

LF from northern hypoarctic tundra

subzone: “Matuiyakha”, “Vaskiny Dachi”,

“Bovanenkovo”, “Tomboito”, “Sebasyak-

ha”, 10-12 – LF from southern hypoarctic

tundra: “Khevese” Laptayakha, Khadyta;

13- LF “Sjunaisale” from northern forest-

tundra

Clear dependence between zonal

position and floristic diversity is

exhibited in the region as well. Floras’

diversity decreases gradually from ca

240 species at “Laborovaya” (E), 156

– at “Vaskiny Dachi” (D), 125 – at

“Kharasavei” (C) and 65-75 at “Bely”

(B). Variation in species richness and,

partly, in composition and coverage

depends also on local relief, soil and

drainage conditions.

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Fnt Fft Estl E D C B A

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

1= Кola-Кarelia (KK); 2= Кanin-Pechora (KP); 3= Ural-Novaya Zemlya (UN);

4= Yamal-Gydan (YG); 5= Тaimyr (T); 6= Anabar-Olenek (АО); 7=

Kharaulakh (K); 8=Yana-Kolyma (YK); 9 = Continental Chukotka (CC); 10=

Chukotka, Wrangel Island (CW); 11= Southern Chukotka (CS); 12=

Beringian Chukotka (CB)

Average number of species (+/- SE) in local floras in different subprovinces

and in different subzones

Similarity measure – Sørensen-Czekanovski index modified by Semkin (1982)

for classes: KAB = Σ min (diA, diB), where KAB - similarity between flora A and B, diA – relative weight i-class in flora A, diB -

relative weight i-class in flora A

Similarity of local floras by spectra of longitudinal fractions

2

Clusters:

All boundaries by similarity of

geographic structure spectra

and areas of density of

ranges of geographic groups

and fractions in different

sectors of the Arctic

Boundaries : 1- floristic

subprovinces, 2 – open woodlands, 3

– stlanic subzone, 4 – by spectra of

longitudinal fractions, 5 – by spectra

of longtitudinal groups, 6 – by spectra

of latitudinal fractions, 7 – by spectra

of latitudinal groups, 8 – generalized

by density of all boundaries in

distribution of groups and fractions

ta02

ta01

cw06

cw02

cw10

cw12

cw11

cw08

cw03

cw09

cw05

cw01

cw04

cw07

cc01 ta1

8ta1

7ta2

7ta2

6ta2

5ta2

1ta0

5ta1

6ta0

3ta0

4ya

01ya

19ya

21ya

14ya

09ya

08ya

06ya

04ya

07ya

05ya

02ya

03ya

23ya

20ya

13cb

15cb

16cb

18cb

14cb

17cb

07cb

08cb

12cb

13cb

06cb

24cb

26cb

27cb

22cb

23cb

20cb

29cb

21cb

28cb

25cb

10cb

09cb

19cb

11cb

04cb

05cc

26cc

32cc

33cc

08cc

24cc

05cc

04cc

22cc

06cc

27cs

12cs

11cs

07cs

14cs

13cs

10cs

06cs

05cs

02cs

01cs

03cs

04cs

08cs

09cc

03cc

02cc

16cc

11cc

20cc

23cc

28cc

19cc

18cc

17cc

14cc

09cc

12cc

07cc

13cc

30cc

29cb

03cb

01cb

02cc

31cc

25 ta12

ta08

ta09

ta20

ta06

ta07

ta10

ta24

ta23

ta15

ta22

ta14

ta13

ta19

ta11

ya24

ya18

ya12

ya15

ya11

ya10

ya22

ya17

ya16

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

II I

А Б

1 2 А Б

1 2 1 2 б а ‘ “ *

**

а б в а б а б “ ‘ * **

б а

IБ1б

IБ2

IА1а’** IА1а”

IА2а

IIБ1а

IIБ1б

IIА

IIБ1в

IIБ2а

IА2б’

* IА2б’** IА2б”

IА1б

IIБ2б

IА1а’* Similarity of local floras by species composition

IБ1а

Dendrogram of local floras similarity by species composition

and distribution of clusters throughout the Russian Arctic

Combination of all bounda-

ries by 10 parameters of

geographical and taxono-

mical structure of local

floras

Boundaries: 1 – floristic

subprovinces, 2 – open

woodlands, 3 – subzone of stlanik,

4 – by condensation of ranges of

distribution of longitudinal groups

and fractions, 5 – by similarity of

spectra of geographic structure 6

– by similarity of spectra of

taxonomic structure

Black – Kola, orange – Kanin-Pechora and

Ural_Novaya Zemlja, blue – Yamal-Gydan,

pink- Taimyr, dark green – Anabar-Olenek,

lilac – Kharaulakh, pale green – Yana-Kolyma,

dark-blue – Kontinental Chukotka, brown –

Beringian Chukotka, chaki –south Chukotka,

lazur - Wrangel

DCA ordination of 238 lists of species (LF),axis 1 reflects

longitudinal gradient

C10 C12 C11 C09 S08 S07 S06 S05 E04 E02 E010.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

Similarity of floras of 11 subprovinces by species composition

Use of our data for nature conservation :

• Revealing of rare and endemic

species

• Revealing of the territories with

abundance of rare species

• Suggestion of objects for the Red

and Green Data Books;

• Writing the essays for the Red and

Green Data Books

Salix berberifolia ssp. fimbriata

THANK YOU!!!