binomial integral more than chebyshev

3
Binomial integrals- plus solutions than Chevished All binomial are A: I =x M dx (x N +k) P We are going to take profit from the series sh m x·ch n x, and also from the circulars sinus m x·cos n x, and the analog sh m x/ch n x ch n x/sh m x, and the circulars sinus m x/cos n x and cos n x/sinus m x. This integrands are solved at Wikipedia (when m and n are integers, then also our problem.) WE will need that N would be 2, then we shall do x=t 2/N dx=t (2-N)/N dt= dt·t (2/N-1) I=dt· t (2/N-1) t 2M/N (t 2 +k 2 ) P Now the blue braket can have the forms ( +/-t 2 +/-k 2 ) p the changes will be t=kshw (when two +) or t=kchw (if +and-) or t=k·sinus(w) (if -&+) and the result I=dw·ch(w) sh [2(M+1)/N-1 (w) [ch(w)] 2P =dw sh m wch n w m= [2(M+1)/N-1] n=2P+1 than have to be integers- (case first) for the second I=dw ch [2(M+1)/N-1] (w) [sh(w)] 2P+1 and the third I=dw·sinus [2(M+1)/N-1] (w)[ (cos(w)] 2P+1

Upload: oriol-serra-pujol

Post on 02-Aug-2016

225 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Chebishev procalmed (1835) only three cases for solving this integral. Here we break this error

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Binomial integral more than chebyshev

Binomial integrals- plus solutions than Chevished

All binomial are A: I=∫xMdx(xN+k)P

We are going to take profit from the series shmx·chnx, and also from the circulars sinusmx·cosnx, and the analog shmx/chnx

chnx/shmx, and the circulars sinusmx/cosnx and cosnx/sinusmx. This integrands are solved at Wikipedia (when m and n are integers, then also our problem.) WE will need that N would be 2, then we shall do x=t2/N

dx=t(2-N)/Ndt=dt·t(2/N-1) I=∫dt·t(2/N-1)t2M/N(t2+k2)P Now the blue

braket can have the forms (+/-t2+/-k2)p the changes will be t=kshw (when two +) or t=kchw (if +and-) or t=k·sinus(w) (if -&+) and the result I=∫dw·ch(w)sh[2(M+1)/N-1(w)[ch(w)]2P=∫dwshmwchnw m=[2(M+1)/N-1] n=2P+1 than have to be integers- (case first) for the second I=∫dwch[2(M+1)/N-1](w)[sh(w)]2P+1 and the third I=∫dw·sinus[2(M+1)/N-1](w)[(cos(w)]2P+1 Then what we need is that m and n would be integers or what is the same P-1 and m+1 A) first case m=2(M+1)/N n=2P P can be multiple of ½ (3/2, 5/2 7/2…) besides an integer, equal than (M+1)/N; then more cases than Chebishev.B) m=2P n=2(M+1)/N as beforeC) n=2P m=2(M+1)/N no new exigences. The three cases have the solutions what said Chebishev, plus all the multiples of 1/2.

Besides, one of the exponents m or n, can be <0. When one exponent is negative we have other formulas:

Page 2: Binomial integral more than chebyshev

A)

B): similarly sinm/cosn, and cosn/sinm that can be seen solved in wikipedia

For products of hyperbolics they are integrated in wikipedia. ( see at the end of the anex):

I(m,n)= ∫du·shmu·chnu==shm-1u·chn+1u/(m+n)-(m-1)/(n+1) ∫shm-2u·chnu·du 2P+1 or n=2(M+1)/N-1 as we had seen

(Chebyshev believed to have demonstrated that there was no more cases, than his three integers [P, (M+1)/N, P+(M+1)/N] but they can be also multiples of 1/2.