be 2012 case study: union crossing - amherst, ma · pdf filebe 2012 case study: union crossing...

BE 2012 Case Study: Union Crossing

Client - Lawrence Community Works


Introduction


Context Plan


Existing Site


Site Plan


Rendering – From rooftop looking North


Rendering - Pedestrian Bridge from Island Street


First Floor Plan


Second Floor Plan


Third Floor Plan


Roof Plan

Drawn by:

Checked by: --

Scale:

Project No.

see aboveDate:

UN

ION

CR

OS

SIN

G

LA

WR

EN

CE

Massachusett

s

08-04

CJP

REVISIONS

C Coldham & Hartman Architects2010

This drawing is

not intended, nor

shall be used for,

construction,

unless the signed

seal of a design

professional is

affixed.

Green Energy Consultant

Stephen Burrington

Planners Collaborative

Civil Engineering

Landscape Architecture

TEC, Inc.

Eckman ConstructionCompany, Inc.

Construction Management

05 Feb 2010

BID SET

Structural Engineering

Architect's Consultants

Owner's Consultants

Mechanical Engineering

Structures NorthSalem, MA

Farmington, CT

Brookline, MA

Boston, MA

Lawrence, MA

Van Zelm, Heywood &Shadford, Inc.

Acoustical

Acentech IncCambridge, MA

Code and Fire Protection

Harold Cutler, PESudbury, MA

Historic Preservation

Agricola CorpChicopee, MA

Energy & Systems

EnergysmithsMeriden, NH

Lighting Design

Naomi MillerTroy, NY

Bedford, NH

LEED Consultants

Steven WinterAssociatesMaynard, MA

A1.6

BUILDING 9-PROPOSEDROOF PLAN

1/16" = 1'-0"

DN

DN

2A4.1

2A4.1

1A4.1

1A4.1

4'-0"4'-0"

101'-41/2"

EXISTING RAIN LEADERLOCATIONS - REPLACE

FIREWALLFUTURE PHOTOVOLTAIC ARRAY

72 ROWS OF 9 PANELS ONROOF (642 PANELS POSSIBLE)

CONDENSOR UNITSON RAISED PLATFORM.SEE A5.3x FOR DETAILS.

EXPECTED TRAFFIC LANECONFIRM OSHA GUARDREQUIREMENTS FOR ROOFACCESS- NOT PUBLIC(NO SCOPE)

FUTURE PHOTOVOLTAICARRAY BY OTHERS.

COORDINATE PLUMBING VENTSAND TRASH CHUTE VENT.

TRASH AND RECYCLINGCHUTE W/ 24" DIA VENTTO 4'-0" ABOVE ROOFSEE A5.3 FOR DETAIL.

NEW PASSENGER ELEVBELOW- COORDINATE W/EXISTING TOWER

SEE SPECIFICATION FORROOFING ALTERNATES

EXISTING DOORSTO REMAIN.

EXISTING DOORTO REMAIN

REFRIGERANT LINESRUNNING TO A SINGLE

SHAFT DOWN.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

A

B

MERRIMACKRIVER

BUILDING # 4 BUILDING # 9 DYE WORKSBUILDING # 9

NOTE: COORDINATE ROOF ANCHORSFOR FUTURE WINDOW WASHINGAND OSHA REQUIREMENTS

ERUERU

PROJECT NORTH

0

1/16" = 1'-0"

4 8 12 16 20 24 28 36 4032


Corridor and Units

RE

VIS

ION

S

Dra

wn b

y:

Checked

by:

--

CJP

Scale

:

Pro

ject N

o.

see a

bo

veD

ate

:

CC

old

ham

& H

artm

an A

rchite

cts

20

10

This

dra

win

g is

no

t inte

nd

ed

, no

r

shall b

e u

sed

for,

co

nstru

ctio

n,

unle

ss th

e s

igned

seal o

f a d

esig

n

pro

fessio

nal is

affix

ed

.

UNION CROSSING

LAWRENCEMassachusetts

08

-04

Gre

en E

nerg

y Consulta

nt

Ste

phen B

urrin

gto

n

Pla

nners

Colla

bo

rative

Civil E

ngin

eerin

g

Land

scap

e A

rchite

ctu

re

TE

C, In

c.

05 F

ebru

ary 2010

BID

SET

Eckm

an C

onstru

ctio

nC

om

pany, In

c.

Constru

ctio

n M

anagem

ent

Stru

ctu

ral E

ngin

eerin

g

Arc

hite

ct's

Co

nsulta

nts

Ow

ner's

Co

nsulta

nts

Mechanic

al E

ngin

eerin

g

Stru

ctu

res N

orth

Sale

m, M

A

Farm

ingto

n, C

T

Bro

oklin

e, M

A

Bosto

n, M

A

Law

rence, M

A

Van Z

elm

, Heyw

ood

&S

had

ford

, Inc.

Acoustic

al

Acente

ch In

cC

am

brid

ge, M

A

Cod

e a

nd

Fire

Pro

tectio

n

Haro

ld C

utle

r, PE

Sud

bury, M

A

His

toric

Pre

serva

tion

Agric

ola

Co

rpC

hic

op

ee, M

A

Energ

y & S

yste

ms

Energ

ysm

iths

Merid

en, N

H

Lig

htin

g D

esig

n

Nao

mi M

iller

Tro

y, NY

Bed

ford

, NH

LE

ED

Consulta

nts

Ste

ven W

inte

rA

sso

cia

tes

Mayn

ard

, MA

A4.4

CO

RR

IDO

RS

EC

TIO

N

AS

NO

TE

D

1'-6"

MECHANICAL DECK

EXHAUST AIR FROM UNITS

REFRIGERANT LINESSET IN PITCH POCKET

BEYOND

HOT WATER SUPPLY PIPE

ENERGY RECOVERY VENTILATOR

STEEL BEAM

COLD WATER SUPPLY PIPE

INSULATION OF 5TH FLOOR DUCTS TBD

METAL DUCT HANGER

PRIMARY DUCT TO CHASE

AIR VALVE &SILENCER @ EACH UNIT

SPRINKLER HEADCENTERED ON HALL

CHASE:REFRIDGERANT PIPING

WHERE REFRIDGERANT LINES CROSS WALL:SEAL BOTH SIDES WITH ACOUSTICAL SEALANT& COVER WITH ESCUTCHEON

3 Third Floor

59'-4 1/2"

4 Fourth Floor

72'-4 1/2"

5 Fifth Floor

85'-4 1/2"

6 Roof

101'-4 1/2"

FRESH AIR

EXHAUST AIR

CENTER

8'-6"

CENTER

9'-9"

CENTER

6'-6"

SPRINKLER10'-9" ELECTRIC

10'-6"

BOTTOM OF TRAY

10'-3/4"

BOTTOM OF TRAY

14'-2"

BOTTOM OF HW PIPE

10'-5 1/2" SPRINKLER10'-10"

CENTER

9'-9"

CENTER

8'-8"

A4.42

A4.43

SUPPLY AIR TO UNITS

HOT WATER RETURN PIPE4TH FLOOR ONLY

BEAM INTEGRATED STRIP LIGHT

EXPOSED CONDUIT

SCONCE LIGHT

REFRIGERANT LINESIN CABLE TRAY

REFRIGERANT PIPING CLIPPEDTO DECKING IN CORRIDOR.CLIPPED TO PLYWOOD IN UNITS.

3/4"

4"

1/2"

1/4"

31/2"

2"

7/8"

2" 1"

ESCUTCHEON AT ALLCOORIDOR PENETRATIONS

2"

4" 1"

FLEXIBLE DUCTFOR ACOUSTIC BREAK

RIGID DUCT FROM ERV

4th Floor

Roof

5th Floor

3rd Floor

2nd Floor

1st Floor

Basement

A4.31 A4.4

1

1DETAIL SECTION - CORRIDOR1/2" = 1'-0"

3DETAIL SECTION - UNIT WALL

MECH PENETRATION1 1/2" = 1'-0"

2DETAIL SECTION - ROOF

MECH PENETRATION1 1/2" = 1'-0"

Drawn by:

Checked by: --

Scale:

Project No.

see aboveDate:

UN

ION

CR

OS

SIN

G

LA

WR

EN

CE

Massachusett

s

08-04

CJP

REVISIONS

C Coldham & Hartman Architects2010

This drawing is

not intended, nor

shall be used for,

construction,

unless the signed

seal of a design

professional is

affixed.

Green Energy Consultant

Stephen Burrington

Planners Collaborative

Civil Engineering

Landscape Architecture

TEC, Inc.

Eckman ConstructionCompany, Inc.

Construction Management

05 Feb 2010

BID SET

Structural Engineering

Architect's Consultants

Owner's Consultants

Mechanical Engineering

Structures NorthSalem, MA

Farmington, CT

Brookline, MA

Boston, MA

Lawrence, MA

Van Zelm, Heywood &Shadford, Inc.

Acoustical

Acentech IncCambridge, MA

Code and Fire Protection

Harold Cutler, PESudbury, MA

Historic Preservation

Agricola CorpChicopee, MA

Energy & Systems

EnergysmithsMeriden, NH

Lighting Design

Naomi MillerTroy, NY

Bedford, NH

LEED Consultants

Steven WinterAssociatesMaynard, MA

2A- 2 BR FLAT

A7.2a1

AS NOTED

A8.1

8

A8.1

7

A8.1

4

SD

SD

SD

EXPOSED BEAMUPPERCABINETS

CENTER ON SINKTYPICAL

SET HAT CHANNELTO RECEIVE HOOKSTYPICAL

VALENCE

C2

J4

J1

J4

Q4

U1

U1

C1Q5

Q3

Q4

J4

J3

L4AC-1AC-2

AC-1

A8.1

1

6

7 A7.2A

8

9

10 A7.2A

12

1314 A7.2A

11

A7.2A

2

3

4

5 A7.2A

15A7.2A5

2'-6"

6'-8"

96'

-8"

2'-8"

10

2'-0"

6'-8

"

7

2'-8"

6'-8

"

8

6'-8

"

2'-0"

4

2'-8"

6'-8

"

3

6'-8"

2'-6"

3173'-0"

6'-8"

2

2'-0"

6'-8"

6

6'-8

"

1'-6"

61

62a

62a

42a

D2a

D2a

DW5'-6"

5'-6"

5'-11" 11'-6"

10'-8

1/2"

4"2'-

1"4"

8'-0

"6"

2'-1"

4"10

'-0"

11'-8" 4" 11'-6"

5'-43/4" 4"

2'-1" 3'-101/2" 2'-1" 3'-6" 4" 2'-21/2" 4" 3'-51/2" 4" 5'-2"

5'-5"

4"3'-

6"

3'-6"

34" M

IN C

LEAR

2'-0"

3'-0"

2'-0"

2'-6"

2'-0"

6'-0

"

MEDICINECABINET

BEDROOM2

BEDROOM1

BATH

CLOSET

CLOSET

DINING

LIVING

CLOSET

CL

ENTRY

L

FUTUREBENCH

KITCHEN

PANTRY

REF

FUTUREBENCH

FUTUREBENCH

WOOD SHEET

RCP KEY

GWB @ 12'-0" (HUNG) DROP CEILING @ 9'-0"

EXPOSED DECKING -AS IS - CLEANED

PAINTED PLYWOOD(APPLIED DIRECTLY TOUNDERSIDE OF EXISTINGDECKING)

GWB @ 8-6" (TOP ONCLOSETS - DOES NOTEXTEND TO 12'-0" CEILINGABOVE)

GWB @ 12'-6" PER NPSREVIEW (SEE A5.1)

12'-0

"

8'-6

"

9'-6

"6"

CEILING MOUNTEDLIGHT

PENDENTSPRINKLER

CLOSET

BENCH &COAT HOOKSBY OWNER

EXPOSEDDUCTS

ENTRY12'-0

"

8'-6

"

PENDENTSPRINKLER

BENCH &COAT HOOKSBY OWNER

EXPOSED DUCTS

CLOSET ENTRYHALL

12'-0

"

FIXED GLAZING@ 7'-3" (ADD ALT.)

SIDEWALLSPRINKLER

EXPOSEDDUCTS

POCKETDOOR

12'-0

"

ENTRYCLOSET

12'-0

"

9'-6

"

FIXED GLAZING@ 7'-3" (ADD ALT.)

COLUMN

EXPOSED STEELBEAM BELOWCEILING

EXPOSEDDUCT

CLOSET

T

12'-0

"

COLUMN

EXPOSED STEELBEAM BELOWCEILING

PENDENTSPRINKLERSEE FP2.1

EVAPORATOR

SMOKEDETECTOR

SUPPLY AIR

9'-0

"

LIGHT FIXTURE

MEDICINECABINET

PENDENT SPRINKLERBELOW CEILING W/

UPRIGHT SPRINKLERABOVE

34"

9'-0

"

5' TUB

ONE-PIECEFIBERGLASS

UNIT W/INTEGRALBLOCKING

1BREFLECTED CEILING PLAN3/8" = 1'-0"

2INTERIOR ELEVATION1/4" = 1'-0"








1APLAN3/8" = 1'-0"

862 SFNOTE: ALL WALLS WITHIN

UNITS ARE TYPE 41 UNLESS

OTHERWISE NOTED


Baseline- Exempt from the Energy Code

155 Pine Street Amherst, MA 01002 coldhamandhartman.com t : 413.549.3616 f : 413.549.6802

Union Crossing- Bui ld ing 9 Thermal Envelope summary

Component Base Design Exterior Walls R4.3

(based on R0.2/inch x 18”) Uninsulated 18” deep brick infill with 36”

piers averaging 28” deep

R22 3 1/2” closed cell foam at R6.2 per

inch on top of brick base value

Windows U value 0.6, shgc 0.45 Aluminum w/ basic glass

Existing to remain- use base

(Also Upgraded to U of 0.33 and shgc of 0.26)

Roof R10 Leave existing roof in place as is- assumed to be 1 layer of tapered polyiso with epdm

membrane over 4” decking

R30 On underside of decking- existing roof to remain – add 3 1/2” closed

cell foam at R6.2 per inch under deck

Floors R6 typically with R8 above warehouse

Same as base

Air infiltration Estimated total cfm 4340 0.5 cfm50/sf of shell

0.0419 cfm natural per sf of shell LIKELY MUCH MORE

Goal of Total cfm 2170 0.25 cfm50/sf of shell

0.021 cfm natural per sf of shell (weak spot is exist windows)


Heating Energy projections Building 9 Union Crossing

Proposed Savings : 81%Proposed Savings : 81%

ProposedProposed Consumption Consumption ((MMBtu/yearMMBtu/year))BaseBase

Insulated -R15

R-20

.1cfm50 / sfof shell

Re-roof: R30

U-value .33

It’s The Envelope,

Exterior Wall

Window

Roof

Garage Ceiling

Air Leakage

U-value .5

As Is: R14

R-10

.5cfm50 / sfof shell

As Is:Brick - R4.3


Energy Reduction - Insulate the brick


Incentives

National Grid 2009 Custom Screening Tool - v 1.0 Report Version - 1.0 10/20/2009 12:03:24 PM

Customer Name: Union Crossing

Project Description: ECM-C -- Improved Envelope

Existing Case Existing Brick Walls Infiltration estimated at 0.50 ACH

Proposed Case 3.5 in. of closed-cell foam on interior of brick walls 6 in. of closed-cell foam on interior of roof deck Infiltration estimated at 0.25 ACH

Utility Contact: Phone Number:

Program: D2 App Number:

State: MA Funding Type: Standard

Time PeriodEnergy (kWh) Reduction Per

Period Hours Per Period Average Demand

Reduction Per Period

Winter

December 5pm-7pm M-F 7434 42 177

January 5pm-7pm M-F 4326 42 103

February 0 0 0

Summer

June 1pm-5pm M-F 0 84 0

July 1pm-5pm M-F 0 84 0

August 1pm-5pm M-F 0 92 0

September 0 0 0

.

Measure Code: BSHL

Measure Description: Building Shell

Measure Life: 20

Base Costs $68,200

Proposed Costs $161,746

Est Incremental Costs $93,546

Est Incr Equip Costs $0

Est Incr Labor Costs $0

Total Est Annual kWh Savings 131,757Average Cost Per kWh 0.1406Est Annual Energy Cost Savings $18,525% On Peak Energy Savings 25 Proposed Incentive $65,482

ResultsOil (Gallons) 0Gas Heating (Therms) 0Gas NonHeating (Therms) 0Water (Gallons) 0WasteWater (Gallons) 0Other ($) $0.0Total NEB $ Savings $0.0

Pk Win kW Rd 140.0Pk Sum kW Rd 0.0kW Years 0Lifetime MWH 2635.1 Payback Without Incentive 5.0Payback With Proposed Incentive 1.5

70% of Incremental $

. . Customer Cost : $28,064

Page 1 of 1National Grid 2009 Custom Screening Tool - Analysis Report

10/20/2009file://C:\CustTool_NG\Cust2009_v1\report.htm


Acoustical Mockup Test - Air Sealing Test


Acoustical Mockup Testing

Description of construction:

Third-Octave BandCenter Frequency (Hz) 100 125 160 200 250 315 400 500 630 800 1000 1250 1600 2000 2500 3150 4000

79.1 74.3 77.3 72.3 69.6 69.8 68.5 65.1 61.3 56.6 53.8 51.0 49.4 47.5 49.4 46.6 41.5

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Absorption Effects 2.1 3.3 1.4 2.3 1.8 1.6 2.7 2.0 2.7 2.6 2.8 2.7 2.6 3.2 3.6 3.5 3.7

81 78 79 75 71 71 71 67 64 59 57 54 52 51 53 50 45

39

Description of Source Room:

Description of Receiver Room:

Figure 5. Impact Sound At Window (Room A)Impact Insulation Measurement Report

JS/CSConsultant:Date of measurement: 11/4/2009

Lower bedroom mockup.

Normalized Impact Sound Levels

Average Impact Sound LevelsAmbient Sound Levels

619804

Field Impact Insulation Class (FIIC):

Upper bedroom mockup.

Acentech Project:Existing wood floor and structure, ceiling at window is two layers of gypsum board attached to wood deck using RSIC-1 clips, insulation in small cavity.

60

70

80

90

Nor

mal

ized

Impa

ct S

ound

Lev

el (d

B)

Impact Sound Spectrum

This test procedure was based on ASTM Standard E1007-04. This page alone is not a complete test report; please refer to the accompanying report for other details associated with these test results.

Lower bedroom mockup.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Nor

mal

ized

Impa

ct S

ound

Lev

el (d

B)

Third-octave Band Center Frequency (Hz)

Impact Sound Spectrum

Normalized Impact Sound Level

FIIC 39 Contour

Description of construction:

Third-Octave BandCenter Frequency (Hz) 100 125 160 200 250 315 400 500 630 800 1000 1250 1600 2000 2500 3150 4000

96.6 98.7 97.1 93.9 97.4 97.9 98.1 97.2 96.1 95.0 94.5 92.9 89.5 88.7 89.3 90.1 90.4

70.8 72.6 65.9 57.6 52.2 50.8 49.8 46.3 43.6 40.3 39.8 37.6 30.0 26.9 26.4 26.1 24.4

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Absorption Effects -3.3 -2.1 -4.0 -3.2 -3.7 -3.9 -2.8 -3.4 -2.8 -2.9 -2.7 -2.7 -2.8 -2.2 -1.8 -2.0 -1.8

29 28 35 39 49 51 51 54 55 58 57 58 62 64 65 66 68

52

Description of Source Room:

Description of Receiver Room:

Airborne Sound Insulation Measurement Report

Average Source Room Sound Pressure Levels

Average Receiving Room Sound Pressure Levels

619804

Date of measurement:Consultant:

Acentech Project:

Figure 1. Airborne Sound Transmission - Standard Floor-Ceiling

JS/CS

Upper mockup bedroom.

Lower mockup bedroom.

Ambient Sound Level

Apparent Sound Transmission Class (ASTC):

Apparent Transmission Loss

Existing wood floor and structure throughout. Ceiling in most of the room is one layer of gypsum board suspended on wire, 18-inch airspace, insulation in cavity. Ceiling at window is one layer of gypsum board attached to wood deck using RSIC-1 clips, insulation in small cavity.

11/4/2009

60

70

80

90 Transmission Loss Spectrum


ASTC 52 Contour

The test procedure was based on ASTM Standard E336-05. This page alone is not a complete test report; please see the accompanying report for other details associated with these test results.

Upper mockup bedroom.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Appa

rent

Tra

nsm

issi

on L

oss

(dB

)

Third-octave Band Center Frequency (Hz)

Transmission Loss Spectrum


ASTC 52 Contour


Solar Hot Water

6/3/09 08-04 SOLAR HOT WATER.xls

Union Crossing - SOLAR HOT WATER

Project: 08-04 Last Revised

Bld 9 29-May-09

Quantity # people subtotal

1 bedrooms 3 1.5 4.5

2 bedrooms 36 2.5 90

3 bedrooms 21 4 84

TOTAL PEOPLE 179

Gallons per person per day 15 52 degree average water temp

8.33 lbs per gallon x delta t

gallons per day 2,678 120 delivery temp

delivered water temp can range over year

gallons per year 977,288

Water Heater can be 90%, but then standby losses

btu input per gallon 686

Produced btu per sf of panel

Total btu required output 670,419,225 160,000

Boiler / system efficiency 85% % solar

60%

Gas input 788,728,500

402,251,535

Therms 7,887

Solar fraction GOAL 60% sf required # panels at 40 sf each

2514.07 62.9

Avoided therms 4,732

cost per sf

$125

installed system cost

$314,259

Coldham and Hartman Architects


High Performance Building Grant- ASHP

Mitsubishi City-Multi ceiling unit

1.4 Quality / availability of equipmentAll of the technologies and equipment being proposed are high-quality off-the-shelf products, currently available.

Closed cell spray foam, Energy Recovery Ventilators, and high-performing wood windows are prevalent throughout the Commonwealth.

Building Energy Dashboards are rapidly becoming more widespread, especially on college campuses in the state. Boston College, for instance, has networked 25 residences for display on a single dashboard and initiated a campus-wide competition to reduce electric consumption, resulting in an estimated 15000 kwh saved over the course of their “NRG Games”.

1.5 RisksThe risks involved in Air Sourced Heat Pumps are ones of half-measures.

The Mitsubishi City-Multi Air Sourced Heat Pumps have excellent Coefficients of Power, from 2.2 to 3.9, but the reliance on electrically-driven heating - without significant load reductions -will not by itself decrease reduce primary (source) energy consumption, reliance on the fossil-driven electric grid, or the carbon output of Union Crossing.

In combination with air sourced heat pumps, envelope-based load reductions can reduce both site and source energy required, resulting in lowered energy consumption, lower cost, and lower carbon outputs.

Without these significant reductions, electrically-driven heating of aging mill buildings may also drive large peak demands. In general, eQuest modeling of this project has shown that the upgrade package proposed increases demand during some “shoulder” months, while decreasing demand at other times - during summer. This “smoothing” of the demand curve will be of benefit to the grid at large.Union Crossing will tread more lightly on the electric grid than its standard practice contemporaries.

The risk of monitoring is that its messages will go unheard. Installation of even the most advanced measuring systems requires diligent follow-up and on-going behavior modification to be of real value.

Lawrence CommunityWorks and the tenants at Union Crossing will engage in active education literacy campaigns to pursue continuous energy reductions, based on feedback from the monitoring systems to be installed. Success in similar education programs indicates good reason to expect success in this field.

Union Crossing Coldham&Hartman Architects

High-Performance Buildings GrantENE - 2010 - 006Narrative

Lawrence CommunityWorks

Evaluation Criterion 1: 1. Technical Merit and Innovation

Park Service -compliant window submittal

Competition propels further savings

7


Energy Monitoring

Control Diagram - 29 December 2009

PRE-PROGRAMMED TO RUN 24/7 AT CONTINUOUS CFM;VFD & DEFROST BY MANUFACTURER;

POWER LOSS = RECIRC MODE

PUBLICBATHROOMS

DDC(CONTINUOUS)

EXHAUSTFAN

WEB-BASED INTERFACEPUBLIC DATA MONITORING

WEB-BASED INTERFACESYSTEM CONTROLS

DATA OUTPUT EG.PROPORTIONALIZED DATA TOSUBMETER TENANT BILLING

(CONFIRM APPLICABLE LAWS)

OPTIONALSUB-

METERREQUIRESAPPROVAL

FLO-METER

1st Floor

2nd Floor

3rd Floor

5th Floor

Roof

Basement

ERUASHP

COMPRESSOR/CONDENSOR

ERV BYTENANT

DAYCARE

EXHAUSTFAN

TRASH ROOMHOT WATERHEATER ANDASSOCIATED

PUMPSBOILER

UNITHEATER

UNITHEATER

(typ of mechrooms, etc.)

BTU

BTU

BTU

WATT-HOUR

AIRHANDLER

UNIT

APAR

TMEN

T UN

ITS

WATT-HOUR

VENTILATION HOTWATER /HYDRONIC HEAT

ELECTRIC

SPACECONDITIONING

AIRHANDLER

UNIT

AIRHANDLER

UNIT

typ unit x 60

mitsubishiGB-50

mitsubishiTG-2000

site pc

HUBBACNET

SOFTWARE

BUILDINGMANAGEMENT

SYSTEM

AIRHANDLER

UNITAIR

HANDLERUNIT

AIRHANDLER

UNIT

60 TENANTELECTRICMETERS

ALARMSYSTEM

typ unit

COMMON AREAS

T-STAT(60º-65º)

DDC(CONTINUOUS)

T-STAT W/OVERRIDEEXHAUST

FAN

Ist FLOOR SPACES

DEVICE

CONTROL

METER

typ unit x 60

is there ventilationmonitoring in the units?

T-STAT(60º-65º)

FLO-METER

typ unit x 60

4th Floor

LEVEL 1 (ISOLATED SYSTEMS CONTROLS AND MONITORING)

LEVEL 2 (ADD CONNECTION TO CENTRAL BMS)

LEVEL 3 (ADD CONNECTION PUBLIC INTERFACE)

ASHPCOMPRESSOR/CONDENSOR

FLO-METER

FLO-METER

FLO-METER

WALLMOUNT

WALLMOUNT

NOT IN BASE

COLD WATER IN FLOW

VOLUMENATURAL GAS IN


Electrical & Mechanical


Air Sealing - Section & Plan


Air Sealing Drawing Set - AS-2


Acoustical Mockup


Blower door

Air sealing results 4th floor isolated with mechanical running- 368,000 cubic foot volume- 3.7 ACH50 or 0.34 cfm50/sf/shell Isolated unit was at 7 ACH 50, but with nearly perfect air barrier vertically Side to side via the “triscut” and corridor wall

be 2012 case study: union crossing - amherst, ma · pdf filebe 2012 case study: union crossing...

Documents