baker v. carr, 369 u.s. 186 (1962)
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)
![Page 2: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Baker v. Carr was initiated in Tennessee in 1959 against Joseph Carr, the Tennessee secretary of
state, and George McCanless, the attorney general.
![Page 3: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
![Page 4: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
89 percent of the population lived in urban areas but received less than 50%
representation.
![Page 5: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
State Resources
Urban tax dollars
50% legislation
11% rural population
![Page 6: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
By the mid-1950s$98 spent on each rural
student$64 spent on each urban
student
![Page 7: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
The best way to retain state resources was to keep things the way they were.
![Page 8: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
![Page 9: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
States with the
fastest growth:
• Florida
• Georgia
• Illinois
Problems greatest in states with fastest growth
![Page 10: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
1842 Rhode Island encountered the Dorr Rebellion led by Thomas Wilson
Dorr.
![Page 11: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
The Industrial Revolution brought many prosperous transplants and immigrants to Rhode Island.
![Page 12: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Thomas Dorr led an unsuccessful attack against Rhode Island on May 19, 1842. Rhode Island’s
Constitution went peacefully into effect in 1843.
![Page 13: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Tennessee’s own Constitution required apportionment among the state’s
ninety-five counties after each decennial census.
![Page 14: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Equal Representation
![Page 15: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
![Page 16: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Colegrove v. Green, 328 U.S. 549 (1946)
![Page 17: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
![Page 18: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
The Supreme Court restricted its decision to questions of:
Jurisdiction
Justiciability
Standing
![Page 19: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Standing: Did Baker and the other plaintiffs have standing (the right) to bring a suit of this kind before
the Court?
![Page 20: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
?
JURISDICTION
![Page 21: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Justiciability: Is it appropriate for the judicial branch to hear and decide this case or should it
be left to the executive or legislative branch?
![Page 22: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
“…it is a responsibility of this Court as ultimate interpreter of the Constitution.”
-Justice Brennan
![Page 23: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Equal protection clause violated
![Page 24: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
![Page 25: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
By the end of the decade the political landscape of the United
States was radically altered.
![Page 26: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
![Page 27: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
“Voting rights have long had the protection of federal
courts.”
SUPREME COURT JUSTICE WILLIAM DOUGLAS
![Page 28: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Supreme Court Justice Tom C. Clark
Considered Tennessee’s original apportionment “a crazy quilt without rational basis.”
![Page 29: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart
He emphasized that the Court had to determine Jurisdiction, Justiciability, and Standing.
![Page 30: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
He set out to prove the inadequacy of arithmetic formulas as measures of the “irrational rationality” of Tennessee’s
apportionment.
Supreme Court Justice John M Harlan
![Page 31: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
County PopulationJustice Clark’s formula
Justice Harlan’s Formula
Van Buren 2,039 .63 .23Moore 2,340 2.00 1.23Pickett 2,565 .70 .22Sequatchie 2,909 .63 .33Meigs 3,039 .93 .48Houston 3,084 1.25 .46Trousdale 3,351 1.33 .43Lewis 3,413 1.25 .39Perry 3,711 1.50 .71Bledsoe 4,198 .63 .49Clay 4,528 .70 .40Union 4,600 .76 .37Hancock 4,710 .93 .62
![Page 32: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Carter
Mau
ry
Wash
ington
Mad
ison
Grundy
Chester
Cumberland
Crock
ett
Loudon
Faye
tte0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
RepresentationPopulation
![Page 33: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter
Wrote Colegrove v. Green and questioned the commission or competence of Supreme Court
Justices to decide apportionment cases.
![Page 34: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
![Page 35: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Many blame bizarrely shaped districts on the Supreme Court
![Page 36: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
The requirement that districts be 99% equal in population is
mathematically absurd.
![Page 37: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
State and Federal judges try to bring some order to the chaos
Tinkering
![Page 38: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022032700/55d583e9bb61ebb6348b4650/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Self-interested political actors redefine apportionment for their own fortunes