b : c e g - amazon simple storage service-+112415... · gym de-stratification fans $1,264 $14,000...

LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM: ENERGY AUDIT REPORT

PREPARED FOR: SPRING LAKE BOARD OF

EDUCATION 411 TUTTLE AVENUE SPRING LAKE, NJ 07762 ATTN: NICK MACKRES SCHOOL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATOR

PREPARED BY: CONCORD ENGINEERING GROUP

520 S. BURNT MILL ROAD

VOORHEES, NJ 08043 TELEPHONE: (856) 427-0200

FACSIMILE: (856) 427-6529 WWW.CONCORD-ENGINEERING.COM

CEG CONTACT: KEVIN C. BLANKENBUEHLER, CEM

DIRECTOR, ENERGY SERVICES EMAIL: [email protected]

REPORT ISSUANCE: FINAL, NOVEMBER 24, 2015

PROJECT NO: 1C15355

H. W. Mountz Elementary School Energy Audit Report

Concord Engineering 1C15355 November 24, 2015 – FINAL Page 1 of 91

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. 3

II. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 10

III. METHOD OF ANALYSIS................................................................................................ 11

IV. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST ............................................................... 13

A. ENERGY USAGE / TARIFFS ...................................................................................................................... 13

B. ENERGY USE INDEX (EUI) ...................................................................................................................... 18

C. EPA ENERGY BENCHMARKING SYSTEM ................................................................................................. 20

V. FACILITY DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................. 22

VI. MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST ............................................................................................ 25

VII. ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES ..................................................................... 26

VIII. RENEWABLE/DISTRIBUTED ENERGY MEASURES ................................................ 69

IX. ENERGY PURCHASING AND PROCUREMENT STRATEGY .................................. 73

X. INSTALLATION FUNDING OPTIONS.......................................................................... 85

A. INCENTIVE PROGRAMS:........................................................................................................................... 85

B. FINANCING OPTIONS: .............................................................................................................................. 87

XI. ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................... 90

XII. ENERGY AUDIT ASSUMPTIONS ................................................................................. 91

Appendix A – ECM Cost & Savings Breakdown

Appendix B – New Jersey Smart Start® Program Incentives

Appendix C – Portfolio Manager “Statement of Energy Performance”

Appendix D – Major Equipment List

Appendix E – Investment Grade Lighting Audit

Appendix F – Renewable / Distributed Energy Measures Calculations



REPORT DISCLAIMER

The information contained within this report, including any attachment(s), is intended solely for use by the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or a person designated as responsible for delivering such messages to the intended recipient, you are not authorized to disclose, copy, distribute or retain this report, in whole or in part, without written authorization from Concord Engineering Group, Inc., 520 S. Burnt Mill Road, Voorhees, NJ 08043.

This report may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you have received this report in error, please notify the sender immediately. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation.



I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This report presents the findings of the energy audit conducted for:

Entity: Spring Lake Board of Education

Facility: H. W. Mountz Elementary School 411 Tuttle Avenue

Spring Lake, New Jersey 07762 Contact Person: Nick Mackres, Business Administrator

This audit is performed in connection with the New Jersey Clean Energy - Local Government Energy Audit Program for the LGEA Applicant. The purpose of this analysis is to provide the owner insight into the energy savings potential that exists within the facility. Energy Efficiency changes and upgrades requires support from the building occupants, operations personnel and the administrators of the building in order to maximize the savings and overall benefit. The efficiency improvement of public buildings provides a benefit for the environment and the residents of New Jersey. The Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs) identified within the report represent the potential annual savings at the facility. It is recommended to consider all ECMs as part of the District’s initiative to save energy, reduce emissions, and lower operating costs. The District should review and be familiar with all measures presented in the report prior to making a decision on which projects to move forward with. This will enable the District to effectively align report recommendations with those outlined in their mid/long range facility plans and financial plans. The District should also review all conventional and unconventional funding, along with all NJCEP funding opportunities for these projects and determine which options fit their budget most positively in the short and long term. The combination of this information will enable the District to put together an effective Energy Savings Improvement Strategy that maximizes the received benefits of the selected projects. The annual energy costs at this facility are as follows: The potential annual energy cost savings for each energy conservation measure (ECM) and renewable energy measure (REM) are shown below in Table 1. Be aware that all ECM’s and REM’s are not additive because of the interrelation of some of the measures. This audit is consistent with an ASHRAE Level 2 energy audit. The cost and savings for each measure is ± 20%. The evaluations are based on engineering estimations and industry standard calculation methods. More detailed analysis would require engineering simulation models, hard equipment specifications, and contractor bid pricing.

Electricity $ 49,292

Natural Gas $ 32,123

Total $81,415



Table 1 ECM Summary Table

The estimated demand and energy savings for each ECM and REM is shown below in Table 2. The descriptions in this table correspond to the ECM’s and REM’s listed in Table 1.

ECM #1Interior Lighting Upgrades

(No Gym)$72,932 $6,607 11.0 35.9%

ECM #2 Exterior Lighting Upgrades $1,611 $253 6.4 135.6%

ECM #3 Interior Lighting Controls $1,500 $75 20.0 -25.0%

ECM #4Replace Lobby Ceiling

Cabinet Heaters$4,500 $370 12.2 64.4%

ECM #5 Rooftop Unit Replacements $38,095 $1,038 36.7 -59.1%

ECM #6 Replace Air-Cooled Chiller $89,268 $3,833 23.3 7.3%

ECM #7Replace Older Unit

Ventilators$82,500 $1,180 69.9 -71.4%

ECM #8 Gym De-Stratification Fans $14,000 $1,264 11.1 35.4%

ECM #9 Upgrade to Full DDC System $89,000 $3,697 24.1 -37.7%

ECM #10 Premium Efficiency Motors $1,660 $46 36.1 -58.4%

ECM #11 VFD on Hot Water Pump $27,125 $524 51.8 -71.0%

ECM #12 New Condensing Boilers $194,435 $4,299 45.2 -55.8%

ECM #13ECM on Smaller Exhaust

Fans$9,257 $605 15.3 -2.0%

ECM #14Water Conservation

Measures$13,533 $898 15.1 -0.5%

ECM #15On-Demand, Gas-Fired

Water Heaters$14,576 $606 24.1 -16.8%

REM #1 80 kW Solar Array $364,205 $28,959 12.6 19.3%

Notes:

NET INSTALLATION

COSTA

RENEWABLE ENERGY MEASURES (REM's)

ECM NO.

DESCRIPTIONNET

INSTALLATION COST

ANNUAL

SAVINGSB

ANNUAL SAVINGS

SIMPLE PAYBACK

(Yrs)

SIMPLE LIFETIME

ROI

A. Cost takes into consideration applicable NJ Smart StartTM incentives.B. Savings takes into consideration applicable maintenance savings.

ECM NO.

DESCRIPTIONSIMPLE

PAYBACK (Yrs)

SIMPLE LIFETIME

ROI

ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES (ECM's)



Table 2 Energy Savings Summary Table

ECM #1Interior Lighting Upgrades (No

Gym)27.1 47,873 0

ECM #2 Exterior Lighting Upgrades 0.6 1,836 0

ECM #3 Interior Lighting Controls 0.0 541 0

ECM #4Replace Lobby Ceiling Cabinet

Heaters0.0 726 257

ECM #5 Rooftop Unit Replacements 6.7 7,522 0

ECM #6 Replace Air-Cooled Chiller 11.6 27,776 0

ECM #7 Replace Older Unit Ventilators 0.0 0 1,125

ECM #8 Gym De-Stratification Fans 0.0 -170 1,226

ECM #9 Upgrade to Full DDC System 0.0 16,592 1,341

ECM #10 Premium Efficiency Motors 0.2 326 0

ECM #11 VFD on Hot Water Pump 0.0 3,800 0

ECM #12 New Condensing Boilers 0.0 0 4,095

ECM #13 ECM on Smaller Exhaust Fans 1.8 4,388 0

ECM #14 Water Conservation Measures 0.0 0 156

ECM #15On-Demand, Gas-Fired Water

Heaters0.0 0 577

REM #1 80 kW Solar Array 73.5 100,025 0

ECM NO.

DESCRIPTION

ANNUAL UTILITY REDUCTION

ECM NO.

DESCRIPTION

ANNUAL UTILITY REDUCTION

RENEWABLE ENERGY MEASURES (REM's)

NATURAL GAS (THERMS)

ELECTRIC DEMAND

(KW)

NATURAL GAS (THERMS)

ELECTRIC CONSUMPTION

(KWH)


ELECTRIC DEMAND

(KW)

ELECTRIC CONSUMPTION

(KWH)



Table 3 Emissions Summary Table

ECM #1Interior Lighting Upgrades

(No Gym)72,767 134 311

ECM #2 Exterior Lighting Upgrades 2,791 5 12

ECM #3 Interior Lighting Controls 822 2 4

ECM #4Replace Lobby Ceiling

Cabinet Heaters4,110 4 5

ECM #5 Rooftop Unit Replacements 11,433 21 49

ECM #6 Replace Air-Cooled Chiller 42,220 78 181

ECM #7Replace Older Unit

Ventilators13,163 10 0

ECM #8 Gym De-Stratification Fans 14,086 11 (1)

ECM #9 Upgrade to Full DDC System 40,910 59 108

ECM #10 Premium Efficiency Motors 496 1 2

ECM #11 VFD on Hot Water Pump 5,776 11 25

ECM #12 New Condensing Boilers 47,912 38 0

ECM #13ECM on Smaller Exhaust

Fans6,670 12 29

ECM #14Water Conservation

Measures1,825 1 0

ECM #15On-Demand, Gas-Fired

Water Heaters6,751 5 0

Total Emissions Reduction 271,730 392 723

Notes:


ECM NO.

DESCRIPTION

GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTION

CO2

EMISSIONS (LBS)

NOX

EMISSIONS (LBS)

SO2

EMISSIONS (LBS)

A. Emissions Reduction based on NJCEP published factors for electric & gas.



Table 4 Facility Project Summary Table

The facility peak electrical demand and total project savings meet the qualifications for the Pay for Performance Program. If the owner were to pursue this program option they would receive an estimated $43,115 in incentive dollars, see the Installation Funding Options Section for more detail.

Interior Lighting Upgrades (No Gym)

$6,607 $81,887 $8,955 $72,932 11.0

Exterior Lighting Upgrades $253 $2,511 $900 $1,611 6.4

Interior Lighting Controls $75 $1,500 $0 $1,500 20.0

Replace Lobby Ceiling Cabinet Heaters

$370 $4,500 $0 $4,500 12.2

Rooftop Unit Replacements $1,038 $38,947 $852 $38,095 36.7

Replace Air-Cooled Chiller $3,833 $90,068 $800 $89,268 23.3

Replace Older Unit Ventilators

$1,180 $82,500 $0 $82,500 69.9

Gym De-Stratification Fans $1,264 $14,000 $0 $14,000 11.1

Upgrade to Full DDC System

$3,697 $89,000 $0 $89,000 24.1

Premium Efficiency Motors $46 $1,660 $0 $1,660 36.1

VFD on Hot Water Pump $524 $27,125 $0 $27,125 51.8

New Condensing Boilers $4,299 $198,435 $4,000 $194,435 45.2

ECM on Smaller Exhaust Fans

$605 $9,257 $0 $9,257 15.3

Water Conservation Measures

$898 $13,533 $0 $13,533 15.1

On-Demand, Gas-Fired Water Heaters

$606 $14,936 $360 $14,576 24.1

Total Project $25,295 $669,859 $15,867 $653,992 25.9

FACILITY PROJECT SUMMARY TABLE

ENERGY CONSERVATION

MEASURES

ANNUAL ENERGY

SAVINGS ($)

PROJECT COST ($)

CUSTOMER COST

SIMPLE PAYBACK

SMART START

INCENTIVES



Overall Assessment: Overall, the H.W. Mountz School is operating more efficiently compared to the National Peer Group Median Source Energy Intensity of 141.4 kBtu/square-foot/year of the closest comparable building type “K-12 School”. The school is also paying an average in cost of energy at $1.36 per square-foot, which is well below typical average costs of $2.00 per square-foot. On the whole, Concord Engineering recommends the District review and be familiar with all measures presented in each facility report prior to making a decision on which projects to move forward with. This will enable the District to effectively align report recommendations with those outlined in their mid/long range facility plans and financial plans. The District should also review all conventional and unconventional funding options, along with all NJCEP funding opportunities for these projects and determine which options fit their budget most positively in the short and long term. The combination of this information will enable the District to put together an effective Energy Savings Improvement Strategy that maximizes the received benefits of the selected projects. The Installation and Funding Options Section further outlines what programs are potentially available to the District for funding the project. Other Considerations: Renewable Energy Conservation Measures: Renewable Energy Measures (REMs) were also reviewed for implementation at the H.W. Mountz School. There is a potential to install solar panels on the roof. In total the area could accommodate 80 kW of solar arrays. The solar arrays would produce approximately 100,029 kilowatt-hours annually that could reduce the overall electric usage of the facility by 30%. The potential for wind generation was also reviewed for the complex; however based on historical wind speed data, it is not a viable option. Energy Procurement Recommendations: It is recommended that the District investigate third party purchasing for electric and natural gas for this facility. Furthermore, the District should investigate cooperative purchasing groups in the event future cost savings could be realized. Further recommendations are outlined in the Energy Procurement Section of this report that could assist the District in finding additional savings through their utility bills. Maintenance and Operational Recommendations: In addition to the ECMs and REMs, there are maintenance and operational measures that can provide significant energy savings and provide immediate benefit, many of which the District is already performing. The ECMs listed above represent investments that can be made to the facility which are justified by the savings seen over time. However, the maintenance items and small operational improvements below are typically achievable with on-site staff or maintenance contractors and in turn have the potential to provide substantial operational savings compared to the costs associated. The following are recommendations which should be considered a priority



in achieving an energy efficient building, further recommendations per building our provided in this building report:

1. Maintain all weather stripping on windows and doors. 2. Clean all light fixtures to maximize light output. 3. Provide more frequent air filter changes to decrease overall system power usage and

maintain better IAQ. 4. Shutdown all non-essential equipment during unoccupied periods.



II. INTRODUCTION

This comprehensive energy audit covers the H. W. Mountz Elementary School. The audit is performed in connection with the New Jersey Clean Energy - Local Government Energy Audit Program. The energy audit is conducted to promote the mission of the Office of Clean Energy, which is to use innovation and technology to solve energy and environmental problems in a way that improves the State’s economy. This can be achieved through the wiser and more efficient use of energy. Electrical and natural gas utility information is collected and analyzed for one full year’s energy use of the building. The utility information allows for analysis of the complex’s operational characteristics; calculate energy benchmarks for comparison to industry averages, estimated savings potential, and baseline usage/cost to monitor the effectiveness of implemented measures. A computer spreadsheet is used to calculate benchmarks and to graph utility information (see the utility profiles below). The Energy Use Index (EUI) is established for the Main Building. Energy Use Index (EUI) is expressed in British Thermal Units/square foot/year (BTU/ft2/yr.), which is used to compare energy consumption to similar building types or to track consumption from year to year in the same building. The EUI is calculated by converting the annual consumption of all energy sources to BTU’s and dividing by the area (gross square footage) of the building. Blueprints (where available) are utilized to verify the gross area of the facility. The EUI is a good indicator of the relative potential for energy savings. A low EUI indicates less potential for energy savings, while a high EUI indicates poor building performance therefore a high potential for energy savings. Existing building architectural and engineering drawings (where available) are utilized for additional background information. The building envelope, lighting systems, HVAC equipment, and controls information gathered from building drawings allow for a more accurate and detailed review of the building. The information is compared to the energy usage profiles developed from utility data. Through the review of the architectural and engineering drawings a building profile can be defined that documents building age, type, usage, major energy consuming equipment or systems, etc. The preliminary audit information is gathered in preparation for the site survey. The site survey provides critical information in deciphering where energy is spent and opportunities exist within a facility. The entire site is surveyed to inventory the following to gain an understanding of how each facility operates:

Building envelope (roof, windows, etc.) Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning equipment (HVAC) Lighting systems and controls

The site visit is performed to survey all major building components and systems. The site visit includes detailed inspection of energy consuming components. Summary of building occupancy schedules, operating and maintenance practices, and energy management programs provided by the building manager are collected along with the system and components to determine a more accurate impact on energy consumption.



III. METHOD OF ANALYSIS

This audit is consistent with an ASHRAE Level 2 energy audit. The cost and savings for each measure is ± 20%. The evaluations are based on engineering estimations and industry standard calculation methods. More detailed analyses would require engineering simulation models, hard equipment specifications, and contractor bid pricing. Post site visit work includes evaluation of the information gathered, researching possible conservation opportunities, organizing the audit into a comprehensive report, and making recommendations on HVAC, lighting and building envelope improvements. Data collected is processed using energy engineering calculations to anticipate energy usage for each of the proposed energy conservation measures (ECMs). The actual building’s energy usage is entered directly from the utility bills provided by the owner. The anticipated energy usage is compared to the historical data to determine energy savings for the proposed ECMs. It is pertinent to note, that the savings noted in this report are not additive. The savings for each recommendation is calculated as standalone energy conservation measures. Implementation of more than one ECM may in some cases affect the savings of each ECM. The savings may in some cases be relatively higher if an individual ECM is implemented in lieu of multiple recommended ECMs. For example implementing reduced operating schedules for inefficient lighting will result in a greater relative savings. Implementing reduced operating schedules for newly installed efficient lighting will result in a lower relative savings, because there is less energy to be saved. The project/entity summary tables are based on the implementation of multiple measures. The analysis is reviewed and determined if the nature of the ECMs will cause a major conflict of the overall savings. When additive measures do not cause a major effect on the overall savings the ECMs are included. Where a major conflict is identified, the combined savings is evaluated appropriately to ensure the overall estimates are ± 20%. ECMs are determined by identifying the building’s unique properties and deciphering the most beneficial energy saving measures available that meet the specific needs of the facility. The building construction type, function, operational schedule, existing conditions, and foreseen future plans are critical in the evaluation and final recommendations. Energy savings are calculated based on industry standard methods and engineering estimations. Energy consumption is calculated based on manufacturer’s cataloged information when new equipment is proposed. Cost savings are calculated based on the actual historical energy costs for the facility. Installation costs include labor and equipment costs to estimate the full up-front investment required to implement a change. Costs are derived from Means Cost Data, industry publications, and local contractors and equipment suppliers. The NJ Smart Start Building® Program incentives savings (where applicable) are included for the appropriate ECM’s and subtracted from the installed cost. Maintenance savings are calculated where applicable and added to the energy savings for each ECM. The life-time for each ECM is estimated based on the typical life of the equipment being replaced or altered. The costs and savings are applied and a simple payback, simple lifetime savings, and simple return on investment are calculated. See below for calculation methods:



ECM Calculation Equations:

SimplePaybackNetCost

YearlySavings

SimpleLifetimeSavings YearlySavings ECMLifetime

SimpleLifetimeReturnonInvestment ROI SimpleLifetimeSavings NetCost

NetCost

LifetimeMaintenanceSavings YearlyMaintenanceSavings ECMLifetime

NetPresentValue CashFlowofPeriod

1 DR

InternalRateofReturn IRR → NetPresentValue 0 CashFlowofPeriod

1 IRR

Net Present Value calculations are based on Discount Rate (DR) of 3%.



IV. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST A. Energy Usage / Tariffs The energy usage for the facility has been tabulated and plotted in graph form as depicted within this section. Each energy source has been identified and monthly consumption and cost noted per the information provided by the owner. Electric Utility Provider: Jersey Central Power & Light Electric Utility Rate Structure: General Service Secondary 3 Phase Third Party Supplier: N/A Natural Gas Utility Provider: New Jersey Natural Gas Utility Rate Structure: General Service Large (GSL) Third Party Supplier: N/A The electric utility measures consumption in kilowatt-hours (KWH) and maximum demand in kilowatts (KW). One KWH usage is equivalent to 1000 watts running for one hour. One KW of electric demand is equivalent to 1000 watts running at any given time. The gas usage profile within each facility report shows the actual natural gas energy usage for the facility. The gas utility measures consumption in cubic feet x 100 (CCF), and converts the quantity into Therms of energy. One Therm is equivalent to 100,000 BTUs of energy. The overall cost for utilities is calculated by dividing the total cost by the total usage. Based on the utility history provided, the average cost for utilities at this facility is as follows: Description Average

Electricity 13.8¢ / kWh

Natural Gas $1.05 / therm



Table 5 Electricity Billing Data

Utility Provider: Jersey Central Power & LightRate: General Service Secondary 3 Phase

Meter No: S07383347Account No: 100 028 711 420

Third Party Utility Provider: N/ATPS Meter / Acct No: N/A

MONTH OF USE CONSUMPTION KWH TOTAL BILL

Oct-13 30,400 $4,325

Nov-13 28,160 $4,017

Dec-13 32,960 $4,604

Jan-14 30,400 $4,230

Feb-14 31,360 $4,304

Mar-14 33,280 $4,460

Apr-14 28,160 $3,840

May-14 26,560 $3,597

Jun-14 27,520 $3,928

Jul-14 23,360 $3,419

Aug-14 21,760 $3,089

Sep-14 27,840 $3,944

Oct-14 23,360 $3,257

Nov-14 30,080 $3,932

Dec-14 26,560 $4,100

Jan-15 28,480 $3,850

Feb-15 30,080 $4,055

Mar-15 36,160 $4,706

Apr-15 24,320 $3,297

May-15 25,600 $3,418

Jun-15 28,480 $3,976

Jul-15 23,360 $3,239

Aug-15 26,880 $3,680

Sep-15 27,200 $3,840

Total 672,320 113.6 Max $93,104

Current 12 Months 330,560 113.6 Max $49,292

AVERAGE DEMAND 92.3 KW averageAVERAGE RATE 0.138 $/kWh

87.0

101.1

80.0

84.2

113.6

89.9

100.8

99.8

ELECTRIC USAGE SUMMARY

DEMAND KW

95.4

97.6

77.1

95.7

92.2

90.6

78.1

100.8

88.6

89.9

92.2

100.8

100.8

89.9

80.7

88.3



Figure 1 Electricity Usage Profile



Table 6 Natural Gas Billing Data

Utility Provider: New Jersey Natural GasRate: General Service Large (GSL)

Meter No: 851424Account No: 01-3302-1700-25

Third Party Utility Provider: N/ATPS Meter No:

MONTH OF USECONSUMPTION

(THERMS)TOTAL BILL

Jun-13 69.55 $500.76

Jul-13 62.72 $491.68

Aug-13 58.03 $485.75

Sep-13 50.79 $478.43

Oct-13 1,840.12 $2,329.66

Nov-13 4,238.46 $4,856.40

Dec-13 6,214.39 $7,301.96

Jan-14 6,094.45 $7,581.76

Feb-14 7,050.92 $9,212.04

Mar-14 4,225.42 $5,446.96

Apr-14 1,641.68 $2,348.78

May-14 87.53 $528.55

Jun-14 48.23 $481.06

Jul-14 36.98 $466.38

Aug-14 29.34 $456.83

Sep-14 15.78 $441.58

Oct-14 1,424.87 $1,651.23

Nov-14 4,305.58 $4,332.70

Dec-14 5,928.20 $6,011.78

Jan-15 6,185.34 $5,737.33

Feb-15 7,677.64 $7,143.16

Mar-15 3,741.26 $3,568.53

Apr-15 1,196.34 $1,364.18

May-15 56.15 $468.49

Total 62,279.77 $73,685.98

Current 12 Months 30,645.71 $32,123.25

AVERAGE RATE: $1.05 $/THERM

N/A

NATURAL GAS USAGE SUMMARY



Figure 2 Natural Gas Usage Profile



B. Energy Use Index (EUI) Energy Use Index (EUI) is a measure of a building’s annual energy utilization per square foot of building. This calculation is completed by converting all utility usage consumed by a building for one year, to British Thermal Units (BTU) and dividing this number by the building square footage. EUI is a good measure of a building’s energy use and is utilized regularly for comparison of energy performance for similar building types. The Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Buildings Technology Center under a contract with the U.S. Department of Energy maintains a Benchmarking Building Energy Performance Program. The ORNL website determines how a building’s energy use compares with similar facilities throughout the U.S. and in a specific region or State. Source use differs from site usage when comparing a building’s energy consumption with the national average. Site energy use is the energy consumed by the building at the building site only. Source energy use includes the site energy use as well as all of the losses to create and distribute the energy to the building. Source energy represents the total amount of raw fuel that is required to operate the building. It incorporates all transmission, delivery, and production losses, which allows for a complete assessment of energy efficiency in a building. The type of utility purchased has a substantial impact on the source energy use of a building. The EPA has determined that source energy is the most comparable unit for evaluation purposes and overall global impact. Both the site and source EUI ratings for the building are provided to understand and compare the differences in energy use. The site and source EUI for this facility is calculated as follows:

BuildingSiteEUIElectricUsageinkBtu FuelUsageinkBtu

BuildingSquareFootage

BuildingSourceEUIElectricUsageinkBtu SSRatio FuelUsageinkBtu SSRatio

BuildingSquareFootage



Table 7 Energy Use Index Summary

The chart above depicts the Site and Source Energy for the facility. The comparable building type in this instance is classified as “K-12 School” with a median Site Energy of 58.2 kBtu/SF and a Source Energy of 141.4 kBtu/SF as obtained from the U.S. National Peer Group Comparison Rating published by Department of Energy in July, 2013. The Median Source Energy Use Intensity is the recommended benchmark metric for all buildings, and is the middle value of the national population meaning half the buildings use more energy, and half use less. The reference source for this data comes from the Department of Energy’s Commercial Building Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS).

kWh Therms Gallons kBtu kBtu

ELECTRIC 330,560.0 1,128,532 3.140 3,543,590

NATURAL GAS 30,645.7 3,064,571 1.050 3,217,800

TOTAL 4,193,103 6,761,390

BUILDING TYPE

BUILDING AREA 59,648 SQUARE FEET

BUILDING SITE EUI 70.30 kBtu/SF/YR 58.2 kBtu/SF/YR

BUILDING SOURCE EUI 113.35 kBtu/SF/YR 141.4 kBtu/SF/YR

20%

ENERGY USE INTENSITY CALCULATION

ENERGY TYPEBUILDING USE

SITE ENERGY

SITE-SOURCE RATIO

SOURCE ENERGY

*Site - Source Ratio data is provided by the Energy Star Performance Rating Methodology for Incorporating Source Energy Use document.

AUDITED BUILDING PEER COMPARISON

K-12 School K-12 School

More Efficient than PEER Comparison



C. EPA Energy Benchmarking System The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in an effort to promote energy management has created a system for benchmarking energy use amongst various end users. The benchmarking tool utilized for this analysis is entitled Portfolio Manager. The Portfolio Manager tool allows tracking and assessment of energy consumption via the template forms located on the ENERGY STAR website (www.energystar.gov). The importance of benchmarking for local government municipalities is becoming more important as utility costs continue to increase and emphasis is being placed on carbon reduction, greenhouse gas emissions and other environmental impacts. Based on information gathered from the ENERGY STAR website, Government agencies spend more than $10 billion a year on energy to provide public services and meet constituent needs. Furthermore, energy use in commercial buildings and industrial facilities is responsible for more than 50 percent of U.S. carbon dioxide emissions. It is vital that local government municipalities assess facility energy usage, benchmark energy usage utilizing Portfolio Manager, set priorities and goals to lessen energy usage and move forward with priorities and goals. In accordance with the Local Government Energy Audit Program, CEG has created an ENERGY STAR account for the District to access and monitoring the complex’s yearly energy usage as it compares to facilities of similar type. The login page for the account can be accessed at the following web address; the username and password are also listed below:

https://www.energystar.gov/istar/pmpam/index.cfm?fuseaction=login.login

The above log in information allows the District to continue to utilize Portfolio Manager to track and monitor their energy performance. For further direction on how to use the Portfolio Manager Tool such as adding properties, entering data, and viewing results, see training material and live training sessions provided by Energy Star that can be found on their website at www.energystar.gov/buildings/training



The utility bills and other information gathered during the energy audit process are entered into the Portfolio Manager. The following is a summary of the results for the facility:

Table 8 ENERGY STAR Performance Rating

ENERGY STAR PERFORMANCE RATING

FACILITY DESCRIPTION

ENERGY PERFORMANCE

RATING

NATIONAL AVERAGE

H.W. Mountz 48 50

Refer to Statement of Energy Performance Appendix for the detailed energy summary for the complex.



V. FACILITY DESCRIPTION

The H. W. Mountz Elementary School is located at 411 Tuttle Avenue in Spring Lake, New Jersey. The 59,648 SF building was originally built in 1921 (three-story) with a major addition in 1971 (two-story), and a minor addition in 2000 (three-story) along with upgrades to some of the HVAC equipment/controls and conversion from steam to hot water heating for the original building. This building is comprised of general offices, classrooms, gymnasium with locker rooms, auditorium, computer labs, small kitchen, media center, art room, music room, nurse’s office, faculty room, restrooms, boiler room and other utility/storage rooms. Occupancy Profile

The typical hours of operation for the school are Monday through Friday between 6:00 am and 9:30 pm, with custodial staff on site afterhours till approximately 10 pm. Additional events occur throughout the year after hours in the facility. The school has an enrollment of approximately 212 students and 40 staff. Building Envelope

Exterior walls for the original 1921 wing are brick and concrete block construction. The large windows throughout are in good condition and are double pane, operable, ¼” coated glass with wood frames and several with sliders and vinyl frames. The roof in the original 1921 building is a built-up roof consisting of a light colored gravel topping, asphalt covering, cover board, and 2-inch rigid roof insulation over concrete decking. The auditorium is a sloped roof with asphalt shingles, nailable roof decking, 3-inch blanket insulation and thermal spacer blocks all over structural steel purlins.

The exterior walls for the 1971 major addition are also comprised of brick and concrete construction. The windows are in good condition and are double pane sliders, operable, ¼” coated glass with aluminum frames. The roofing system is constructed of modified bitumen roofing with asphalt/ply sheets, asphalt, cover board, and rigid roof insulation (R-11) over metal decking. Entire roof is covered with a silver coating.

The 2000 minor addition is brick and concrete block construction. The windows are in good condition and are double pane, operable, ¼” coated glass with aluminum frames. The roofing system is comprised of a sloped roof with a standing-seam metal roofing system, nailable roof decking, 3-inch blanket insulation and thermal spacer blocks all over structural steel purlins.

HVAC Systems

The heating hot water is provided by two (2) Universal Boiler Works Model BF200WH cast iron sectional, natural gas-fired boilers rated at 8,370 MBH each with an approximate thermal efficiency of 76.5%. Each boiler has a PowerFlame Burner Model CR5-G-30 rated at 3,000 MBH minimum and 8,370 MBH maximum with a 7.5 HP Blower Motor. These boilers are extremely oversized and should be replaced with correctly sized, high-efficiency condensing units.



Heating hot water is circulated by two pairs of Taco Model FE25J3E2 pumps rated at 200 GPM at 60’ TDH and 180 GPM at 60’ TDH. Each of the four (4) pumps is powered by Baldor 5 HP motors with an efficiency of 87.5%. One pair serves the original 1921 wing & 2000 addition and the other pair the 1971 major addition.

The original classrooms (1921 wing) are conditioned by unit ventilators manufactured by Herman Nelson AVS 15 floor models and Trane Model VUVE1500 and 1250 that were upgraded from steam to hot water coils during the 2000 HVAC upgrade. The units are fitted with hot water heating coils, 2-way control valves, Carrier and Trane UV controllers, etc.

The 1971 Addition classrooms are conditioned by unit ventilators manufactured by Trane Model FSSN12H1 and Model VUVC12511. These units are fitted with hot water heating coils, 2-way control valves and upgraded Carrier unit ventilator controllers.

The 2000 addition/renovation has Carrier Models 40UV150 and 40UV750, AAF-McQuay Model P.KHS.1.014.C.Z., and Trane Model VUVC12511F0H3 unit ventilators in the perimeter rooms that contain both chilled water and hot water coils along with Carrier Comfort Control systems. The first floor SGI room is served by a Carrier Model 48GS-024060 DX cooling/gas-fired heating rooftop that is rated at 2 tons of cooling and 60 MBH of heating. The second floor conference room is served by a Carrier Model 48GS-030060 DX cooling/gas-fired heating rooftop that is rated at 2.5 tons of cooling and 60 MBH of heating. The third floor interior rooms are served by a Carrier Model 48TFE008-501KB DX cooling/gas-fired heating rooftop that is rated at 6 tons of cooling and 180 MBH of heating.

The main offices are heated and cooled by McQuay Model PKHS1014CZ6 console fan coil units with hot water and chilled water coils, Carrier Control Systems, and two-way control valves. The nurse’s office has an AAF-McQuay Model P.KHS.1.014.C.Z.62 unit ventilator. All of these units were installed during the 2000 HVAC upgrades. The gym is ventilated and heated by two (2) large heating and ventilating units with hot water coils and hung from the steel joists.

The 2000 addition and the main office fan coil units are served by a Carrier Model 30GTN035 air-cooled rooftop chiller that is rated at 31 tons of cooling capacity and has an efficiency of 9.4 EER.

Various rooms have split units that have the evaporator units in the room and the air-cooled condensers on the roof. Science Rooms each have a Trane Model 4TR3060 D unit with a cooling capacity of 5 tons and a rated efficiency of 13 SEER. The elevator room has a Sanyo Model C1211 mini-split rated at 1 ton of cooling capacity. The Technology office is cooled by an EMI Model S1H4000D10 split unit with a cooling capacity of Classroom 201 has a Mitsubishi Model MXZ-3B30NA unit rated at 2.5 tons of cooling capacity with two (2) indoor units Model MSZ-GE15NA. Room 207 has a Sanyo Model K3012W air-cooled condenser with a cooling capacity of 28,000 BTUH and an efficiency of 10 SEER and an indoor unit Model K3012.

The Gym and Locker Room areas are conditioned by heating only ventilating units located in the ceiling. The units have hot water heating coils. The gym also has roof-mounted exhaust fans which assist in removed hot air from the gym during cooling season. The main lobby entrance,



stairwells, and corridors are heated by ceiling-mounted hot water cabinet unit heaters. Most rooms also have fin-tube radiators along the perimeter walls. Exhaust System

General and toilet exhaust air is removed through roof mounted down blast mushroom style fans manufactured by Greenheck, Loren Cook, and Dayton. These rooftop units range in size from 270 CFM to 3600 CFM and have motors that range from 1/6 to 1/2 HP. There are also return fans on the roof that range in size from 435 CFM to 3,600 CFM (1/4 HP to 3/4 HP). HVAC System Controls

The HVAC equipment within the building are controlled by a Carrier Comfort System with some areas still controlled through a pneumatic air system. There are two (2) Carrier control panels that monitor/control the boilers, hot water pumps, outdoor air temperature, various hot water mixing valves, chiller status, pump status, chilled water supply/return temperature, etc. In addition the Carrier controls have equipment schedules, night time setback, occupied/unoccupied temperature settings, Cycle III damper set points, air quality measurements, economizer lockout temperature set points, etc.

The administration fan coil units, boiler room/chiller, and 1st thru 3rd floor unit ventilators are all monitored by the Carrier Comfort Control System with each of the units containing Carrier controllers. There are Carrier, Coleman, and Trane thermostats and space temperature sensors throughout the facility for local control. Domestic Hot Water

Domestic hot water is provided by an A. O. Smith model GCV 50 300 gas-fired hot water heater rated at 40 MBH input, 50 gallons of storage and a recovery rate of 40.9 gallons per hour. The thermal efficiency of this unit is approximately 80%.

Plumbing System

The restroom faucets in the 1971 addition have aerators rated at 2.2 GPM, urinals rated at 1.0 GPF and water closets rated at 1.6 GPF. The restrooms in the original building were upgraded during the 2000 addition and renovations. Kitchen Equipment

The students have catered lunches so there is no commercial cooking/serving kitchen. There is a small kitchenette for the staff with several microwaves and a Maytag Model MTB2456GEW refrigerator. Another refrigerator is a Crosley Model CRTE181AW3. Lighting

Refer to the Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix for a detailed list of the lighting throughout the facility and estimated operating hours per space.



VI. MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST

The equipment list contains major energy consuming equipment that through implementation of energy conservation measures could yield substantial energy savings. The list shows the major equipment in the complex and all pertinent information utilized in energy savings calculations. An approximate age was assigned to the equipment in some cases if a manufactures date was not shown on the equipment’s nameplate. The ASHRAE service life for the equipment along with the remaining useful life is also shown in the Appendix. Refer to the Major Equipment List Appendix for this facility.



VII. ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES ECM #1: Interior Lighting Upgrade Description: The majority of the interior lighting throughout the H. W. Mountz Elementary School is provided with fluorescent fixtures with older generation, 32W T8 lamps with electronic ballasts. These fixtures can be replaced and retrofitted with new LED type fixtures and lamps. The gym has been upgraded to a 4-lamp, T5 high output system with the latest electronic ballasts and does not need to be upgraded. Incandescent lamps can be replaced with LED lamps. This ECM includes replacing and retrofitting the interior lighting with new LED type lamps and fixtures. It is recommended the School District consult with a professional engineer prior to retrofitting or replacing fixtures to ensure code required minimum light levels will be met. Energy Savings Calculations: The Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix outlines the hours of operation, proposed retrofits, costs, savings, and payback periods for each set of fixtures in the each building.

Maintenance Savings & Project Costs: No maintenance cost savings were estimated for this measure. Project costs are estimated based on RS Means Unit Cost Data and Vendor Quotes.

DESCRIPTION SAVINGSElectric Demand Savings (kW) 27.1Electric Usage Savings (kWh) 47,873

Electric Cost Savings ($) $6,607

LIGHTING UPGRADE SAVINGS SUMMARY



Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $81,887

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $8,955

Net Installation Cost ($): $72,932

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $6,607

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $6,607

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15

Simple Payback 11.0

Simple Lifetime ROI 35.9%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $99,105

Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 4%

Net Present Value (NPV) $5,941.94

ECM #1 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY



ECM #2: Exterior Lighting Upgrade Description: The exterior lighting at H. W. Mountz Elementary School includes exterior building lighting only. The exterior of the building is currently lit by 70-Watt metal halide wall pack fixtures, pole lights, pole mounted high pressure sodium fixtures, and incandescent A-lamps. Concord Engineering recommends upgrading the nine (9) wall pack exterior building lighting to an energy-efficient lighting system such as RAB Exterior Wall Packs with 18-Watt LED lamps. Energy Savings Calculations: A detailed Investment Grade Lighting Audit can be found in Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix that outlines the proposed retrofits, costs, savings, and payback periods.

Maintenance Savings and Project Costs: No maintenance cost savings were estimated for this measure. Project Costs are based off RS Means Unit Cost Data and Vendor quotes.


Electric Cost Savings ($) $253

LIGHTING UPGRADE SAVINGS SUMMARY





NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $900



Energy Savings ($/Yr): $253

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $253


Simple Payback 6.4









ECM #3: Interior Lighting Controls Upgrade Description: Sometimes lights in a facility are left on unnecessarily. In many cases the lights may be left on because of the inconvenience to manually switch lights off when a room is left or on when a room is first occupied. In some instances lights might be left on due to the misconception that it is better to keep the lights on rather than to continuously switch lights on and off. Although increased switching reduces lamp life, the energy savings outweigh the lamp replacement costs. The payback timeframe for when to turn the lights off is approximately two minutes. If the lights are expected to be off for at least a two minute interval, then it pays to shut them off.

Lighting controls come in many forms. Sometimes an additional switch is adequate to provide reduced lighting levels when full light output is not needed. Occupancy sensors detect motion and will switch the lights on when the room is occupied. Occupancy sensors can either be mounted in place of a current wall switch, or on the ceiling to cover large areas. In addition, daylight control systems can be implemented using daylighting control systems that dim the electric lighting in response to interior daylight levels. The light output of the fluorescent lamps (T8) is varied by using electronic dimming ballasts. Photosensors, typically mounted in the ceiling, are used to measure the quantity of daylight in the space then determine the amount of dimming required to maintain adequate lighting levels in the total space. The U.S. Department of Energy sponsored a study to analyze energy savings achieved through various types of building system controls. The referenced savings is based on the “Advanced Sensors and Controls for Building Applications: Market Assessment and Potential R&D Pathways,” document posted for public use April 2005. The study has found that buildings have the potential to achieve significant energy savings through the use of building controls. The average energy savings are as follows based on the report:

Occupancy Sensors for Lighting Control 20% - 28% energy savings.

Savings resulting from the implementation of this ECM for energy management controls are estimated to be 20% of the total light energy controlled by occupancy sensors. This ECM includes installation of ceiling or switch-mount sensors at six (6) locations. Sensors shall be as manufactured by Sensorswitch, Watt Stopper or equivalent. The Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix of this report includes the summary of lighting controls which can be implemented in this ECM and outlines the proposed lighting/daylighting controls, costs, savings, and payback periods. The calculations adjust the lighting power usage by the applicable percent savings for each area that includes lighting controls.



Energy Savings Calculations:

kWh/YrEnergyLightControlledSavings%SavingsEnergy

kWh

$CostElecAvekWhSavingsEnergySavings.

Maintenance Savings and Project Costs: No maintenance cost savings were estimated for this measure. Project Costs are based off RS Means Unit Cost Data and Vendor quotes. Energy Savings Summary:

DESCRIPTION SAVINGSElectric Demand Savings (kW) 0.0Electric Usage Savings (kWh) 541


LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGS SUMMARY








Simple Payback 20.0

Simple Lifetime ROI -25.0%



Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -3%

Net Present Value (NPV) ($604.65)




ECM #4: Replace Hot Water Cabinet Unit Heaters in Lobby Entrance Description: There are two (2), hot water, ceiling-recessed, cabinet unit heaters in the lobby entrance that are in poor condition and past their service life as per ASHRAE standards. These two (2) cabinet unit heaters have a rated capacity of 49 MBH each. Due to present age/condition, escalating owning and maintenance costs, these cabinet unit heaters should be replaced. This ECM would remove the existing cabinet unit heaters and install 2’ x 4’ hot water radiant ceiling panels and re-install hot water supply/return piping and the wall thermostat that controls these units. Radiant ceiling panel systems similar to those by Sterling Hydronic Products are an energy saving heating method that provides comfortable, draft free temperature control. These hot water radiant panel systems would be installed in the existing lobby entrance interior T-bar ceiling and supported by 2-wire hangers. Energy Savings Calculations: The following assumptions were used: Hours per Day: 24 Design Temperature (°F) 14 Degree Day Base Temperature (°F) 65 Design Temperature Difference (°F) 51 The following energy calculations were used in an Excel spreadsheet format to calculate the electrical and gas savings: HeatingEnergy kBtu

CapacityBtuh OversizeFactor 0.8

24HrDay

HDD Modifier1∆T

1kBtu

1,000Btu

HeatingEnergy kBtu

CapacityBtuh OversizeFactor 0.8

24HrDay

HDD Modifier1∆T

1kBtu

1,000Btu

FanPower kWh

FanHP 0.746 HeatingSeasonHours AdjustmentFactor1

FanEff 75%



ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

Description Ceiling Cabinet

HeatersRadiant Ceiling Panels

(2x4)

Quantity of Units 2 2

Heating Capacity Each (MBH) 49 49

Cabinet Heater Fan Power (HP) 1/8 -

Heating System Efficiency (%) 80% 80%

Heating Degree Days (65 F) 5073 5073

Degree Day Adjustment Factor 0.55 0.55

Heating Season Hours 5,840

Fan Run Hours Adjustement 50%

Cabinet Heater Fan Power (kWh) 726 0

Radiant Heat Compensation Factor 1 0.8

Heating Energy (kBtu) 102,940 82,352

Electric Rate ($/kWh) $0.138 $0.138

Natural Gas Rate ($/therm) $1.05 $1.05

Electric Usage (kWh) 726 0 726

Natural Gas (therms) 1,287 1,029 257

Energy Cost ($) $1,451 $1,081 $370

COMMENTS:

CONVERT TO HW RADIANT CEILING PANELS

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

Quantiy of Radiant Panels may change based on meeting capacity requirement.



Maintenance Savings and Project Costs: No maintenance cost savings were estimated for this measure. Project Costs are based upon RS Means Unit Cost data and local contractor pricing. Energy Savings Summary:








Simple Payback 12.2









ECM #5: Replace Rooftop Units with Ultra-High Efficiency Units

Description:

The 2000 Three-Story Addition is heated and cooled by three (3) packaged rooftop units. Each unit is equipped with direct expansion cooling and a gas-fired furnace. These units are standard efficiency units and can be replaced with new high efficiency units. New units provide higher full load and part load efficiencies due to advances in inverter motor technologies, heat exchangers and higher efficiency refrigerants such as R410A.

This ECM includes replacement of these three (3) older rooftop units with new higher efficiency systems. It is recommended to fully evaluate the capacity needed for all new systems prior to moving forward with this ECM. A summary of the unit replacement for this ECM can be found in the table below:

The manufacturer used as the basis for the calculation is Carrier. The unit pricing and install cost were estimated based on current rates quotes and labor rates. The payback may change based on actual unit pricing and install costs if the ECM is implemented.


Cooling Energy Savings: Seasonal energy consumption of the air conditioners at the cooling mode is calculated with the equation below:

EnergySavings, kWh CoolingCapacity,BTUHr

1SEER

1SEER

OperationHours

1000 WkWh

DemandSavings, kWEnergySavings kWhHoursofCooling

ECM INPUTS SERVICE FORNUMBER OF UNITS

COOLING CAPACITY,

BTU/HR

TOTAL CAPACITY,

TONSREPLACE UNIT WITH

RTU HVAC-1 1 30,000 2.5 Carrier 48LC Ultra-High Efficiency Unit



Total 3 126,000 10.5

IMPLEMENTATION SUMMARY



CoolingCostSavings EnergySavings, kWh CostofElectricity$

kWh

Note: Due to the age and overall condition of the units, the existing efficiency was estimated to be lower than the nameplate EER.

Project Cost and Maintenance Savings

The manufacturers used as the basis for the calculation is Carrier. The unit pricing and install cost were estimated based on RS Means unit cost data and vendor quotes. The payback may change based on actual unit pricing and install costs if the ECM is implemented. No maintenance savings were estimated for this measure.

ECM INPUTS

COOLING CAPACITY,

BTU/Hr

ANNUAL COOLING

HOURS

EXISTING UNITS EER

PROPOSED UNITS EER

# OF UNITS

ENERGY SAVINGS

kWh

DEMAND SAVINGS

kW

RTU 30,000 1,131 9.2 EER 17.1 EER 1 1,704 1.5

RTU 24,000 1,131 9.3 EER 17 EER 1 1,322 1.2

RTU 72,000 1,131 8.9 EER 17.5 EER 1 4,496 4.0

Total 126,000 3 7,522 6.7


ECM INPUTS# OF

UNITSTOTAL COST

REBATES NET COSTENERGY SAVING

PAY BACK

YEARS

RTU 1 $9,273 $230 $9,043 $235 38.5

RTU 1 $7,418 $184 $7,234 $182 39.7

RTU 1 $22,256 $438 $21,818 $621 35.2

Total 3 $38,947 $852 $38,095 $1,038 36.7

COST & SAVINGS SUMMARY











Simple Payback 36.7





Net Present Value (NPV) ($25,703.42)




ECM #6: Air-Cooled Chiller Replacement Description: The existing air-cooled chiller serving portions of the school is a 31 ton capacity Carrier Model 30GTN035 unit located on the roof of the 2000 addition. The chiller is approximately fifteen (15) years old and is considered to be inefficient as compared with today’s minimum standard efficiency. The chiller is reported to operate seasonally (outdoor air temperatures of 55°F or higher) when the school requires cooling. The outdoor chiller’s coils appeared to be in poor condition with significant corrosion observed on its exposed aluminum fin coils. The chiller casing also is severely rusted, particularly on top. Due to the observed condition of the chiller’s coils, it is estimated that the chiller’s cooling capacity has likely been diminished from its original rating and most likely will continue to decline as the coils continue to deteriorate. This ECM includes replacing the existing chiller with a new and more efficient, air-cooled Carrier Model 30MPA high-efficiency 30-Ton chiller installed in place of the existing chiller. It is assumed for this ECM that the existing chilled water pumps will remain in the mechanical room and the piping will be re-connected to the new chiller. Additional ECM’s in this report take into consideration the upgrade of the chilled water pumps (VFD on chilled water pump) and is calculated as separate standalone savings. When combined with the pumping upgrade and new controls associated with the new chiller, even greater savings could be realized. Energy Savings Calculations: Algorithms DemandSavings Tons PDC IPLVb IPLVq EnergySavings Tons EFLH IPLVb IPLVq

UtilityCostSavingsEnergySavingskWh

Year

$kWh

$Year

Definition of Variables Tons = Rated equipment cooling capacity EFLH = Equivalent Full Load Hours – Measure of chiller use by season PDC = Peak Duty Cycle: fraction of time the compressor runs during peak hours IPLVb = IPLV of baseline equipment as referenced from the manufacturer’s data IPLVq = IPLV of qualifying equipment as provided by manufacturer of selected equipment The calculations were carried out and the results are tabulated in the below table.



Equipment Incentives: From the NJ Smart Start® Program, this electric air-cooled chiller replacement warrants an incentive based on the full load kW per Ton. The program incentives are calculated as follows: NJ Smart Start® Incentive = Full Load Tons x $/Ton Incentive = 40 Ton x $20/Ton = $800

Tag Cooling Tons IPLV

kW/Ton

Electric Usage, kWh

CH-1 35 1.256 70,336

EXISTING

Manufacturer ModelIPLV

kW/Ton

Electric Usage, kWh

Carrier 30MPA040 0.760 42,560

PROPOSED

Electric Demand, kW

Electric Usage, kWh

Electric CostPayback,

Years

11.6 27,776 $3,833.09 23.3

SAVINGS

67.00%1,600

$0.138

Calculation Constants

Electric Cost, $/kWh

Peak Duty CycleFull Load Hours











Simple Payback 23.3


Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings 0







ECM #7: Replace Hot Water Unit Ventilators Description: There are eleven (11) hot water unit ventilators in the facility that are past their service life as per ASHRAE standards. These eleven unit ventilators have an average air flow capacity of 1,250 CFM each. Due to present age/condition, escalating owning and maintenance costs, these unit ventilators should be replaced. This ECM would install new hot water supply/return piping, replace the unit ventilators with newer hot water units that feature a face and bypass damper to allow a variable portion of the mixed return and ventilation air to flow over a hot water coil (such as AAF-Herman Nelson Model AV Unit Ventilator). This method of capacity control also allows for free cooling when the outdoor air is relatively cool and full-stream cooling is not necessary. These unit ventilators would be equipped with hot water modulating valves, hot water coils, and DDC controllers that would communicate with the room thermostats and other equipment such as the boilers indicating when to supply hot water for heating demand. The outside air intake opening would need to be enlarged to comply with the latest ventilation codes. This would require brick/block work, larger outside air louver, and reworking of the shelving. Energy Savings Calculations: During the occupied hours of the classroom, internal heat gains from people, lights, and computer (9,500 Btu/hr) effectively lowers the heating requirements by 17ºF. When the thermostat is set to 70ºF, the classroom does not need heat until the outside temperature drops to 53ºF (assuming no gains from solar heating). During unoccupied hours, the thermostat should be set to 55ºF, but there are no heat gains to lower the heating requirement, hence the classroom space needs heating whenever the outside temperature drops below 55ºF. Using these assumptions, the existing 1,250 CFM hot water unit ventilator uses approximately 332 therms during occupied hours and 77 Therms during unoccupied hours. This equates to a total unit ventilator thermal consumption of 409 therms/unit/year. By installing a hot water unit ventilator with a DDC controller, a digital thermostat and an unoccupied setpoint of 55ºF, it is estimated that the energy savings per unit ventilator would be approximately 25% of the existing hot water cost for each unit ventilator. Total Fuel Savings = 25% x 409 therms = 102.2 therms/yr. per unit ventilator Total energy savings = 25% x (409 therms x $1.05/therm) = $107.36/yr. per unit ventilator. 11 unit ventilators x $107.36/year = $1,180 per year in energy cost savings.



The installed cost of a new 1,250 CFM hot water unit ventilator including architectural work, new outside air louver, piping, insulation, controls, etc. = $7,500/unit. Maintenance Savings and Project Costs: No maintenance cost savings were estimated for this measure. Project Costs are based upon RS Means Unit Cost data. Energy Savings Summary:








Simple Payback 69.9









ECM #8: De-Stratification Fans in the Gym Description: The Gymnasium has a 30-foot ceiling and with high ceilings typically stratification of heated air occurs, resulting in air at ceiling level being much warmer than at the floor. Since temperature at the floor level dictates the comfort of occupants and is typically the location of the thermostat controlling the system, this results in additional operating hours to satisfy space conditions. This ECM would install four (4) Airius Model A25 de-stratification fans to be suspended from the ceiling, with all required electrical wiring and supports. These fans should only operate during heating season to help maintain a higher floor temperature and reduce cycling time. Energy Savings Calculations: The calculations are based on the manufacturer’s percent savings utilizing the height of the ceiling and associated temperature differential between floor and ceiling. The temperature differential in this case was estimated at 12.5 degrees Fahrenheit. HeatingEnergy kBtu 80%OversizeFactor SpaceHeatingCapacity HDDAdj. Factor 24

∆

Savings kBtu HeatingEnergy PercentSavings

FanPowerPenalty kWh FanPower W WinterOperatingHours1kWh1,000W

Each Airius Model A25 unit has a 32-Watt fan motor.




Description Existing GymnasiumProposed GYM w/

Fans

Space Heating Type Hot Water Hot Water

Space Heating Capacity (MBH) 455 455

Heating Efficiency (%) 70% 70%

Heating Degree Days (65 F) 5062 5062

Degree Day Adjustment Factor 0.45 0.45

Space Ceiling Height (ft) 30 30

Ceiling-Floor T (oF) 15.0 15.0

Percent Energy Savings - 22%

Destrat Fan Power (kWh) - 170

Heating Energy (kBtu) 557,416 434,784

Electric Rate ($/kWh) $0.138 $0.138


Electric Usage (kWh) 0 170 (170)

Natural Gas (therms) 5,574 4,348 1,226

Energy Cost ($) $5,853 $4,589 $1,264

COMMENTS:

DESTRATIFICATION FAN ANALYSIS


Ceiling-Floor Temperature Differential Based on 0.5 F per Foot











Simple Payback 11.1









ECM #9: Digital Energy Management System (DDC EMS) Description:

The H. W. Mountz Elementary School currently is controlled only by local thermostats with an outdated building management system. The installation of a new generation DDC system with updated software and remote access to control the rooftop units, the air-cooled chiller, unit ventilators, pumps, boilers and other mechanical equipment could yield significant savings through nighttime setback; temperature reset capability, and improved maintenance response time to outages and breakdowns. This ECM includes installation of newer DDC controls on the older HVAC equipment in the facility. The system will include interface to the rooftop units, air-cooled chiller, pumps, and boiler controls, new thermostats, exhaust fan on/off controllers, in addition to the existing front end computer and main controller and updated software with remote access. With the communication between the control devices and the new updated digital interface/software, the facility manager will be able to take advantage of scheduling for occupied and unoccupied periods based on the actual occupancy of each space in the facility. The DDC system will also aid in the response time to service / maintenance issues when the facility is not under normal maintenance supervision, i.e. after-hours. The Central DDC system installation has the potential to provide significant savings by controlling the HVAC systems as a whole and provide operating schedules and features such as space averaging, night set-back, temperature override control, outside temperature reset, etc. The U.S. Department of Energy sponsored a study to analyze energy savings achieved through various types of building system controls. The referenced savings is based on the “Advanced Sensors and Controls for Building Applications: Market Assessment and Potential R&D Pathways,” document posted for public use April 2005. The study has found that public school buildings have the potential to achieve significant energy savings through the use of building controls. The average energy savings are as follows based on the referenced report:

Energy Management and Control System Savings: 5%-10%. Savings resulting from the implementation of this ECM for energy management controls upgrade are estimated to be 5% of the electricity and 5% of the natural gas utility used to heat and cool the facility.

The basis for the updated DDC system is a Honeywell Energy Management System or similar.




Energy savings for each utility is calculated with the equation below.

EnergySavings Utility CurrentEnergyConsumption EstimatedSavings,% Following table summarizes energy savings via implementation of a Digital Energy Management System Upgrade:


ECM INPUTSPartial DDC

ControlsFull DDC Controls

Existing Gas Usage (Therms) 26,814 -

Existing Electricity Usage for HVAC (kWh)

331,840 -

Energy Savings, Gas - 5%

Energy Savings, Electricity - 5%

Gas Cost ($/Therm) $1.050 $1.050

Electricity Cost ($/kWh) $0.138 $0.138

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

Gas Usage (Therms) 26,814 25,473 1,341

Electricity Usage (kWh) 331,840 315,248 16,592

Gas Cost ($) $28,155 $26,747 $1,408

Electricity Cost ($) $45,794 $43,504 $2,290

Energy Cost ($) $73,949 $70,251 $3,697

DDC ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSYEM CALCULATIONS




Maintenance Savings and Project Costs: No maintenance cost savings were estimated for this measure. Project Costs are based off RS Means Unit Cost data. Energy Savings Summary:








Simple Payback 24.1









ECM #10: Premium Efficiency Motors Description: The improved efficiency of the NEMA Premium® efficient motors is primarily due to better designs with use of better materials to reduce losses. Surprisingly, the electricity used to power a motor represents 95% of its total lifetime operating cost. Because many motors operate continuously 24 hours a day, even small increases in efficiency can yield substantial energy and dollar savings. The two (2) 5-HP electric motors driving the hot water pumps in the boiler room are candidates for replacing with premium efficiency motors. These standard efficiency motors run considerable amount of time over a year. This energy conservation measure replaces existing inefficient electric motors with NEMA Premium® efficiency motors. The implementation plan is as follows:


ElectricUsage, kWhHP LF 0.746 HoursofOperation

MotorEfficiency

where, HP MotorNameplateHorsepowerRating LF LoadFactor MotorEfficiency MotorNameplateEfficiency ElectricUsageSavingskWh ElectricUsage ElectricUsage ElectricUsageSavings, kWh ElectricUsage ElectricUsage

Electriccostsavings ElectricUsageSavings ElectricRate$

kWh

EQMTID

FUNCTIONMOTOR

HPHOURS OF

OPERATIONEXISTING

EFFICIENCY

NEMA PREMIUM

EFFICIENCYP-1 Hot Water Pump 5 1,696 87.5% 90.2%P-2 Hot Water Pump 5 1,696 87.5% 90.2%

IMPLEMENTATION SUMMARY



The calculations were carried out and the results are tabulated in the table below:


EQMTID

QTYMOTOR

HPLOAD

FACTOREXISTING

EFFICIENCYPROPOSED

EFFICIENCY

POWER SAVINGS

kW

ENERGY SAVINGS

kWH

COST SAVINGS

P-1 1 5 75% 87.5% 90.2% 0.10 163 $23P-2 1 5 75% 87.5% 90.2% 0.10 163 $23

TOTAL 0.2 326 $46

PREMIUM EFFICIENCY MOTOR CALCULATIONS








Simple Payback 36.1



Simple Lifetime Savings $690






ECM #11: Install VFD on Hot Water Pumps Description: Heating hot water is pumped around the H. W. Mountz Elementary School by two (2) pumps. These pumps have 5 HP motors with an efficiency of 87.5% and an estimated flow rate of 180 gallons per minute at a total dynamic head of 60 feet. This ECM includes the installation of Variable Frequency Drives on these two (2) 5 horsepower hot water pumps in addition to adding new premium efficiency inverter duty motors. The VFD control is based on a differential pressure sensor in the water loop to measure demand for water. Energy Savings Calculations:

PumpPowerHPFlow Head .

3650 η η

EnergyConsumption kWh MotorHP 0.746kWHP

Hoursofoperation Hr1

η

TotalEnergyConsumption kWh EnergyConsumptionofEachMotor

EnergyCost $ TotalComsumption kWh AverageCostofElectric$

kWh

Affinity Laws are used in order to calculate energy savings by calculating the reduced power consumption requirement based a reduction in flow. Affinity laws, are as following: Q = Flow, n = RPM, p = total pressure QQ

nn

pp

nn

HPHP

nn




ECM INPUTS CV Pump VFD Pump

Flow Control Throttle VFD -

Motor Nameplate HP 5.0 5.0

Flow* (GPM) 180 180 -

Head* (Ft) 60 60 -

Pump Efficiency (%) 60.0% 60.0% -

Motor Efficiency (%) 87.5% 90.2% 2.7%

Operating Hrs 1372.5 1372.5 -

Elec Cost ($/kWh) 0.138 0.138 -


Electric Energy (kWh) 4,388 2,488 1,900

Electric Energy Cost ($) $606 $343 $262

HOT WATER PUMPS VFD SAVINGS CALCULATION


COMMENTS:Savings for Two (2) 5 HP Pumps = $524



Estimated Operating Profile with VFD:









Simple Payback 51.8









ECM #12: New Modular Condensing Boilers Description: The H. W. Mountz Elementary School has two (2) Universal Boiler Works water-tube hot water boilers that are 15 years old, and while not having surpassed their ASHRAE useful life expectancy, they are less efficient than newer condensing boilers. The boilers have a rated input capacity of approximately 8,370 with an estimated thermal efficiency of 70% due to their age, condition and being oversized. These existing boilers are oversized and Concord Engineering strongly recommends that detailed heat load calculations be performed to correctly size the boilers required for this facility. Concord Engineering has estimated that the heating load is closer to 4,000 MBH and has used this estimate for the energy savings calculations and cost of new condensing boilers. This ECM would install two (2) new condensing style boilers each rated at 2,000 MBH with an average thermal efficiency of 92%. The new boilers would include hot water reset and outdoor air reset controls to reduce heating water temperature during low load periods.

Energy Savings Calculations: Energy Savings were calculated utilizing the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities Protocols to Measure Resource Savings. BuildingHeatRequired

NaturalGasUsage therm HeatingEfficiency

FuelHeatValueBtutherm

ProposedGasUsageBuildingHeatRequired Btu

HeatingEfficiency FuelHeatValue Btutherm

EnergyCost HeatingGasUsage therm FuelCost$

therm

Description thermUtility Bill Usage 30,646.0Domestic Hot Water 3,877.0Gas-Fired Rooftop Units 3,939.0Heating Boilers 17,122.5

NATURAL GAS USAGE BREAKDOWN




ECM INPUTSWater-Tube

(Water)New Condensing

Boilers

Existing Nat Gas (Therms) 17,122

Boiler Efficiency (%) 70.0% 92.0% 22%

Nat Gas Heat Value (BTU/Therm)

100,000 100,000

Equivalent Building Heat Usage (MMBTUs)

1,199 1,199

Gas Cost ($/Therm) $1.05 $1.05


Natural Gas Usage (Therms) 17,122 13,028 4,095

Energy Cost ($) $17,979 $13,679 $4,299

COMMENTS:

CONDENSING BOILER CALCULATIONS


Boiler Efficiency Based on age of boiler and IBR Rating





NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $4,000






Simple Payback 45.2









ECM #13: EC Motors on Small Exhaust Fans Description: Electronically Commutated Motors (ECM) are proven to generate substantial savings on small motor applications. These motors currently are available in sizes up to 1 horsepower, and provide efficiencies similar to how NEMA premium efficiency motor would at a large horsepower. The motor works much like a direct current (DC) motor and is without mechanical brushes and the commuter reduces friction losses in the motor. The motors are programmable and can be used for a wide range of applications. This measure would replace the existing fan motor in the rooftop exhaust fans with a fractional horsepower ECM. In total, there are (4) 1/4 HP motors, two (2) 1/2 HP motors, and three (3) 1/6 HP motors. Energy Savings Calculations: Measured savings for ECM motors has proven that up to 65% reduction in power can be realized through the installation of these high-efficiency motors.

ElectricEnergy kWhAmps Volts Phase /

1000 PowerFactor OperatingHours

EnergySavings ElectricEnergy PowerReduction 40%



EC MOTOR SAVINGS SUMMARY



ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGSECM INPUTS PSC ECM

Quantity of Motors 4 4

Motor Nameplate HP 1/4 1/4

Full Load Amps 5.8

Voltage 115 115

Phase 1 1

Power Factor 55% 55%

Operating Hrs 2400 2400

Load Reduction - 40.0%

Elec Cost ($/kWh) 0.138 0.138




ELECTRONICALLY COMMUTATED MOTOR CALULATION


COMMENTS: Rooftop Exhaust Fan






Full Load Amps 14.4

Voltage 115 115

Phase 1 1




Elec Cost ($/kWh) 0.138 0.138






COMMENTS: Rooftop Exhaust Fan



Maintenance Savings and Project Costs: No maintenance cost savings were estimated for this measure. Project Costs are based off RS Means Unit Cost data.




Full Load Amps 3.9

Voltage 115 115

Phase 3 3




Elec Cost ($/kWh) 0.138 0.138






COMMENTS: Rooftop Exhaust Fans











Simple Payback 15.3









ECM #14: Water Conservation Measures Description: The facility utilizes standard plumbing fixtures. The typical water closet and urinal water consumption only meet the minimum federally required standard for water efficiency. New flush valves are available that use less water than today’s requirements and can add up to significant water reduction over a long period. In addition, the sinks do not have low-flow aerators nor automatic shut offs. This ECM includes the replacement of the existing water closet and urinal flush valves within the restrooms at the facility. In addition, low-flow aerators and automatic shutoffs will be installed at all sinks. The estimated usage of the plumbing fixtures is based on the total population of the facility. The number of valves/faucets to be replaced is based on observation of the facility in combination with federal minimum standards per occupancy load. The proposed retrofit includes installation of low-flow automatic flush valves that utilize 1.28 gallons per flush for the water closets, 0.5 gallons per flush for the urinals, 0.25 gallons per activation for the sinks, and 0.50 GPM for the sink faucet aerators. Energy Savings Calculations: For the basis of this calculation the LEED rating system was used to estimate the occupancy usage for students within the school. When water consumption information was not available, the GPF values were estimated for the existing fixtures. A. Urinals and Toilets:

Flush

GalFixture

DayperPerson

FlushUse

Yr

DaysOccupancynConsumptioWater

Gal1000

Gal1000$

CostAveGallonsn ConsumptioWater

CostWater



B. Automatic Sink Faucets with Low-Flow Aerators

WaterUsage Quantity OperationDaysyr

UsageMinDay

FixtureGalMin

ElectricUsage

FaucetWaterUsage Gal 8.33lbsGal

SpecificHeat 1 ∆T 70

3,413Btu

1HWHEfficiency

50%


ECM INPUTS Existing FixturesLow Flow / Auto

Flow Fixtures-

Total Number of Occupants 213 213 -

% Male to Female 50% 50% -

Occupied Days Per Year 180 180 -

Lavatory Uses per Day per Person (Female) 2 2 -

Lavatory Uses per Day per Person (Male) 1 1

WC Uses per Day per Person 2.0 2.0 -

Urinal Uses per Day per Person 1.0 1.0 -

Total Urinal Flushes Per Day 107 107 -

Total WC Flushes Per Day 320 320 -

Urinal Gallons Per Flush (GPF) 2.000 0.500 1.500

WC Gallons Per Flush (GPF) 2.6 1.28 1.32

** Water Cost ($/1000 Gal) $5.00 $5.00 -


Water Consumption, Urinal and WC (Gal) 187,866 83,198 104,668

Water Cost ($) $939 $416 $523

COMMENTS:

WATER CONSERVATION CALCULATIONS


*Savings are based on LEED Reference Guide for Green Building Design and Construction - 2009 Edition for WC and Urinal water usage.



NaturalGasUsage

FaucetWaterUsage Gal 8.33lbsGal

SpecificHeat 1 ∆T 70

100,000Btu

1HWHEfficiency

50%

Project Cost and Incentive Estimates: The cost for installation and materials for eighteen (18) water closet automatic flush valves, seven (7) urinal automatic flush valves, and twelve (12) automatic sink shutoffs with low-flow sink aerators is approximately $13,533. There are no Smart Start rebates for installation of low flow or automatic plumbing fixtures.


Quantity of Sinks 12 12

Flow Rate (GPM) 2.2 0.5 1.7

Device Usage (min per day) 10 5

Facility Operation (days / year) 180 180

Heat Content of Water (Btu/gal/°F) 8.33 8.33

Temperature Rise (°F) 70.0 70.0

Efficiency of Heating System (%) 80% 94%

Conversion Factor for Electric 3413 3413

Conversion Factor for Gas 100000 100000


Water Rate ($/1000gal) $5.000 $5.000

Natural Gas Usage (Therm) 173 17 156

Water Usage (gallons) 47,520 5,400 42,120

Energy Cost ($) $419 $45 $375COMMENTS:

LOW FLOW WATER SAVING DEVICES


Heating Savings based on 50% Hot Cold Mix. Water Rate Estimated











Simple Payback 15.1









ECM #15: Tankless, Gas-Fired, Condensing, Domestic Water Heater

Description:

Domestic hot water for the H. W. Mountz Elementary School is provided by an A. O. Smith Model GCV 50 300, gas-fired, water heater with an input rating of 40 MBH. This unit has a rated thermal efficiency of only 80% and a recovery of 40.9 gallons per hour. This water heater could be replaced by a more efficient condensing water heater system that would provide the required hot water on demand. This ECM will replace the existing gas-fired domestic water heater with two (2) tankless, gas-fired condensing water heaters with 94% thermal efficiency. The work would include installation of the two (2) tankless units, new cold water and hot water piping, gas piping and pressure regulator, and electrical. The existing A. O. Smith gas-fired water heater will be used as a standby unit. Energy Savings Calculations: Energy Density for “Education” type building = 5.2 kBtu / SF / year

DHWHeatUsage EnergyDensitykBtu yr

SFBuildingSquareFootage SF

DHWTotalUsageDHWHeatUsage

%

EnergyCost HeatingFuelUsage FuelUnits FuelCost$

Unit



Maintenance Savings and Project Costs: No maintenance cost savings were estimated for this measure. Project Costs are based off RS Means Unit Cost data.


ECM INPUTSExisting Gas Hot

Water Heater

Tankless High Efficiency

CondensingWater Heater

Building Type Education

Building Square-foot 59,648 59,648

Domestic Water Usage, kBtu 310,169.60 310,169.60

DHW Heating Fuel Type Gas Gas

Heating Efficiency 80% 94% 14%

Total Usage (kBTU) 387,712 329,968 57,744

Nat Gas Cost ($/Therm) $ 1.050 $ 1.050


Natural Gas Usage (Therms) 3,877 3,300 577

Energy Cost ($) $4,071 $3,465 $606

COMMENTS:

DOMESTIC WATER HEATER CALCULATIONS

Savings are based on Energy Information Administration Commercial Building Energy Consumption Survey 2003 Information












Simple Payback 24.1









VIII. RENEWABLE/DISTRIBUTED ENERGY MEASURES Globally, renewable energy has become a priority affecting international and domestic energy policy. The State of New Jersey has taken a proactive approach, and has adopted in its Energy Master Plan a goal of 30% renewable energy by 2020. To help reach this goal, New Jersey created the Office of Clean Energy under the direction of the Board of Public Utilities and instituted a Renewable Energy Incentive Program to provide additional funding to private and public entities for installing qualified renewable technologies. A renewable energy source can greatly reduce a building’s operating expenses while producing clean environmentally friendly energy. Concord Engineering has assessed the feasibility of installing renewable energy measures (REM) for the Fire Academy Complex utilizing renewable technologies and concluded that there is potential for solar energy generation. Solar Generation Solar energy produces clean energy and reduces a building’s carbon footprint. This is accomplished via photovoltaic panels which are mounted on all south and southwestern facades of the building. Flat roof, as well as sloped areas can be utilized; flat areas will have the panels turned to an optimum solar absorbing angle. (A structural survey of the roof would be necessary before the installation of PV panels is considered). The state of NJ has instituted a program in which one Solar Renewable Energy Certificate (SREC) is given to the Owner for every 1000 kWh of generation. SREC’s can be sold anytime on the market at their current market value. The value of the credit varies upon the current need of the power companies. The average value per credit is around $152, this value was used in our financial calculations. This equates to $0.152 per kWh generated. CEG has reviewed the existing roof, ground, and parking lot area potential of the facility for the purposes of determining a potential for a photovoltaic system. The facility was evaluated for the most economical and feasible areas for the installation of a solar array, which included a roof mounted array. A depiction of the area utilized at the facility is shown in Renewable / Distributed Energy Measures Calculation Appendix. Note this analysis did not include a structural evaluation to determine if the roof could accommodate the additional loading, which would be required to be performed prior to implementation. The total KWH production for the system is 100,029 kWh annually, reducing the overall utility bill for the facility by approximately 30% percent. A detailed financial analysis can be found in the Renewable / Distributed Energy Measures Calculation Appendix. This analysis illustrates the payback of the system over a 25 year period. The eventual degradation of the solar panels and the price of accumulated SREC’s are factored into the payback. The proposed photovoltaic array layout is designed based on the specifications for the Sharp Model ND-240QCJ panel. This panel has a “DC” rated full load output of 240 watts, and has a total panel conversion efficiency of 14.4%. Although panels rated at higher wattages are available through Sharp and other various manufacturers, in general most manufacturers who produce commercially available solar panels produce a similar panel in the 200 to 250 watt range. This provides more manufacturer options to the District if they wish to pursue the proposed solar recommendation without losing significant system capacity.



The array system capacity was sized based on available roof space, ground area, or parking canopy style system area available at the existing complex. Estimated solar array generation is calculated based on the National Renewable Energy Laboratory PV Watts Version 1.0 Calculator. In order to calculate the array generation an appropriate location with solar data on file must be selected. In addition the system DC rated kilowatt (kW) capacity must be inputted, a DC to AC de-rate factor, panel tilt angle, and array azimuth angle. The DC to AC de-rate factor is based on the panel nameplate DC rating, inverter and transformer efficiencies (95%), mismatch factor (98%), diodes and connections (100%), dc and ac wiring(98%, 99%), soiling, (95%), system availability (95%), shading (if applicable), and age(new/100%). The overall DC to AC de-rate factor has been calculated at an overall rating of 86%. The PV Watts Calculator program then calculates estimated system generation based on average monthly solar irradiance and user provided inputs. The monthly energy generation and offset electric costs from the PV Watts calculator is shown in the Renewable/Distributed Energy Measures Calculation Appendix. The proposed solar arrays for the complex are qualified by the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities Net Metering Guidelines as a Class I Renewable Energy Source. These guidelines allow onsite customer generation using renewable energy sources such as solar and wind with a capacity of 2 megawatts (MW) or less. This limits a customer system design capacity to being a net user and not a net generator of electricity on an annual basis. Although these guidelines state that if a customer does not generate (produce more electricity than they use), the customer will be credited those kilowatt-hours generated to be carried over for future usage on a month to month basis. Then, on an annual basis if the customer is a net generator the customer will then be compensated by the utility the average annual PJM Grid LMP price per kilowatt-hour for the over generation. Due to the aforementioned legislation, the customer is at limited risk if they generate more than they use at times throughout the year. With the inefficiency of today’s energy storage systems, such as batteries, the added cost of storage systems is not warranted and was not considered in the proposed design. Direct purchase involves the District paying for 100% of the total project cost upfront in lieu of one of the methods noted in the Installation Funding Options section below. Calculations include a utility inflation rate as well as the degradation of the solar panels over time. The financial summary for the complex is as follows:



Concord Engineering recommends that the District review all options available for installation of solar PV systems at the facility including a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA). This option utilizes providers who will own, operate, and maintain the system for a period of 15 years. During this time the PPA Provider would sell all of the electric generated by Solar Array to the District at a reduced rate compared to their existing electric rate. It should be noted that current SREC pricing has significantly impacted the PPA market in addition to the end of the 30% grant in lieu of the investment tax credit. These recent market changes have made it more difficult for entities to secure low cost power purchase price options.




SREC Revenue ($/Yr): $15,155




Simple Payback 12.6


Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $227,322


Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 2.3%


REM #1 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY



Wind Generation

In addition to the Solar Analysis, CEG also conducted a review of the applicability of wind energy for the facility. Wind energy production is another option available through the Renewable Energy Incentive Program. Wind turbines of various types can be utilized to produce clean energy on a per building basis. Cash incentives are available per kWh of electric usage. CEG investigated the potential for smaller building mountable wind turbines, and horizontal turbines to maximize the available free space. In order to be economically viable a site requires a minimum average speed of 6 meters per second (13.5 mph). Based on the obtained wind data shown in Figure 3 for Spring Lake, NJ the annual average wind speed is 10.8 mph with a peak of 12.5 mph, making this area unattractive for wind development. Therefore, wind energy is not a viable option for implementation.

Figure 3

Spring Lake, New Jersey Average Wind Speeds



IX. ENERGY PURCHASING AND PROCUREMENT STRATEGY Load Profile: Load Profile analysis was performed to determine the seasonal energy usage of the facility. Irregularities in the load profile will indicate potential problems within the facilities. Consequently based on the profile a recommendation will be made to remedy the irregularity in energy usage. For this report, the facilities energy consumption data was gathered in table format and plotted in graph form to create the load profile. Refer to The Electric and Natural Gas Usage Profiles included within this report to reference the respective electricity and natural gas usage load profiles. Electricity: The electricity usage profile demonstrates a fairly flat load profile from winter to summer, with steady demand peak. As depicted in the table below you can see the average monthly consumption and demand profiles for each season for the facility.

The fairly flat monthly consumption can benefit when soliciting third party prices for electricity as energy usage does not peak during grid congested months that result in higher prices. Natural Gas: The Natural Gas Usage Profile demonstrates a heating load dominated profile, with significant consumption drop off during the summer months. The table below shows the monthly average consumption for gas during the winter and summer seasons for the each facility.

KWH PER MONTH

KW PER MONTH

Summer (May to September) 25,856 92Winter (October to April) 29,554 92

Avg. Load Increase Winter to Summer -12.5% -0.5%

ELECTRIC UTILITY SEASONAL LOAD PROFILE

DESCRIPTIONSEASONAL AVERAGES

THERM PER MONTH

Summer (May to September) 589.4Winter (October to April) 9,788.3

Avg. Load Increase Summer to Winter 94.0%

NATURAL GAS UTILITY SEASONAL LOAD PROFILE

DESCRIPTIONSEASONAL AVERAGES



This load profile will yield less than favorable natural gas prices due to the heating dominated profile. Higher winter month consumption will yield higher pricing which will not be offset by the summer month consumption. NYMEX commodity pricing is generally higher in the winter months of November – March and lower in the summer months of April – October. Tariff Analysis: Electricity: The facility receives electrical service from Jersey Central Power & Light (JCP&L) under commercial rate classifications General Service Secondary (GS3). The facility has not contracted a Third Party Supplier (TPS) to provide electric commodity service. For electric supply (generation) service, the client has a choice to either use JCP&L’s default service rate BGS or contract with a Third Party Supplier (TPS) to supply electricity. Each year since 2002, the four New Jersey Electric Distribution Companies (EDCs) - Public Service Gas & Electric Company (PSE&G), Atlantic City Electric Company (ACE), Jersey Central Power & Light Company (JCP&L), and Rockland Electric Company (RECO) - have procured several billion dollars of electric supply to serve their Basic Generation Service (BGS) customers through a statewide auction process held in February. BGS refers to the service of customers who are not served by a third party supplier or competitive retailer. This service is sometimes known as Standard Offer Service, Default Service, or Provider of Last Resort Service. The Auction Process has consisted of two auctions that are held concurrently, one for larger customers on an hourly price plan (BGS-CIEP) and one for smaller commercial and residential customers on a fixed-price plan (BGS-FP). This facility’s rate structure is based on the fixed-price plan (BGS-FP). The utility will continue to be responsible for maintaining the existing network of wires, pipes and poles that make up the delivery system, which will serve all consumers, regardless of whom they choose to purchase their electricity or natural gas from. JCP&L’s delivery service rate includes the following charges: Customer Service Charge, Distribution Charge (kWh and Demand), Societal Benefits Charge (SBC), and Securitization Transition Charge. Natural Gas: The facility currently receives natural gas distribution service from New Jersey Natural Gas (NJNG) under rate schedule General Service Large (GSL). The facility has not contracted with a Third Party Supplier (TPS). For natural gas supply service, the client has a choice to either use the utility’s default service rate BGSS or contract with a Third Party Supplier (TPS) to supply natural gas commodity service. The utility provides basic gas supply service (BGSS) to customers who choose not to shop from a Third Party Supplier (TPS) for natural gas commodity. The option is essential to protect the



reliability of service to consumers as well as protecting consumers if a third party supplier defaults or fails to provide commodity service. The utilities are responsible for maintaining the existing network of wires, pipes and poles that make up the delivery system, which will serve all consumers, regardless of whom they choose to purchase their electricity or natural gas from the utility’s delivery service rate includes the following charges: Customer Service Charge, Distribution Charge, & Societal Benefits Charge (SBC).

Electric and Natural Gas Commodities Market Overview:

In our region, electricity is produced by natural gas, nuclear, coal and renewables. Much of the recent electricity price fluctuations can be attributed to the spot natural gas pricing variations on generation that produces electricity and the retirement of coal plants that result in increased production demand from other sources of generation.

It is important to note that both natural gas and electric commodity market prices are moved by supply and demand, political conditions, market technicals and trader sentiment. The market is continuously changing Energy commodity pricing is also correlated to weather forecasts. Because weather forecasts are dependable only in the short-term, prolonged temperature extremes can really cause extreme price swings.

Short Term Energy Outlook - US Energy Information Administration (September 2015):

U.S. Natural Gas Prices. Natural gas spot prices averaged $2.77/MMBtu at the Henry Hub in August, an decrease of $0.07/MMBtu from July. The monthly average natural gas price is expected to remain lower than $3/MMBtu, through November and will remain below $4/MMBtu throughout the forecast period. Projected Henry Hub natural gas price averages $2.84/MMBtu in 2015 and $3.11/MMBtu in 2016.

Natural gas futures prices for December 2015 delivery (for the five-day period ending September 3, 2015) averaged $2.91/MMBtu. Current options and futures prices imply that market participants place the lower and upper bounds for the 95% confidence interval for December 2015 contracts at around $2.08/MMBtu and $4.06/MMBtu, respectively.



U.S. Electricity Retail Prices. EIA expects the U.S. residential price of electricity to average 12.7 cents per kilowatt-hour in 2015, an increase of 1.3% compared to last year. EIA has projected retail sales of electricity to the commercial sector to grow by 0.7% in 2015, and grow by 1.3% in 2016.

U.S. Petroleum Product Prices. EIA expected even with the recent cold weather that heating oil prices will be lower than last winter, due to lower projected crude oil prices compared to last winter. Compared to last winter retail heating oil prices are expected to average $2.73/Gal this winter.



Contracting with Third Party Suppliers and BGS Bidding Options Cooperative Purchasing: Cooperative Purchasing agreements allow multiple parties to come together under the premise of using purchasing power in order to reduce the price for goods and services. In this instance the Cooperative is under the unified goal of reducing energy prices for its members. As such members of the cooperative pool their respective energy consumption together into a single bid to obtain low cost energy pricing. Many Cooperatives have a formal bidding process and insure all suppliers provide the required documentation and paperwork necessary per New Jersey Administrative Code and Procurement Law. In addition, a Master Agreement is incorporated into the bid specifications with terms and conditions for the energy supply award protecting Local Government Entities. Concord does not recommend signing any Third Party Supplier contract or agreement unless it has been heavily vetted by an attorney that understands commodity law and regulation. Many government clients that have signed third party supplier contracts are now experiencing regulatory pass-thru charges due to vague or inadvertently agreed terms and conditions. Important information can be found on DCA’s website regarding Cooperative Purchasing. Please visit web link: http://www.state.nj.us/dca/divisions/dlgs/programs/lpcl_docs/Procuring_Power_Supply_through_a_Cooperative_Purchasing_System.pdf

It is important with any commodity procurement undertaking that you incorporate a rational, defensible strategy for purchasing commodity in volatile markets based upon the following:

Budgets that reflect sound market intelligence



An understanding of historical prices and trends Awareness of seasonal opportunities (e.g. shoulder months) Negotiation of fair contractual terms An aggressive, market based price

Bidding Practices and Processes:

Different bid processes and methodologies can create different objectives, but transparency is always a primary goal. Closed bid competitive purchase RFBs, online bid receipt or online reverse auctions can be utilized. Firms which can provide online bidding and reverse auctions are approved by the New Jersey Division of Local Government Services pursuant to the Local Unit Electronic Technology Program, (P.L.2001, c. 30). Approved firms can be found on the website at: http://www.state.nj.us/dca/divisions/dlgs/programs/lpcl.html. The Board of Public Utilities also offers a list of energy suppliers available for each service territory that can be found on the website at: http://www.bpu.state.nj.us/bpu/commercial/shopping.html#nbr1 Over the last decade, Concord Engineering has been involved with numerous approaches to bidding including the Traditional Sealed Bid format and Online Reverse Auction methods. In our experience, Online Reverse Auctions do not always produce optimum results for retail commodity purchases. The procurement consultant with the Client should determine a bidding practice that will yield optimum results and create a robust competitive environment. Many factors will come into consideration to determine whether the Online Bidding and/or Reverse Auction method is appropriate. Factors such as annual consumption, number and complexity of accounts, potential supplier participation as well as rate tariffs must be taken into consideration. LGE’s Purchasing Options:

Per DCA’s paper entitled “Taking Advantage of Lower Electric Rates for your Government Agency” they state, “First, it is important to emphasize that procurement of power supply must be consistent with the Local Public Contracts Law (LPCL) or for boards of education, the Public School Contracts Law (PSCL). Bottom line: When the estimated amount of spending for power supply is above the contracting unit’s bid threshold, power supply must be publicly bid or purchased subject to an exception to the bid law. “Full text can be found via web link: http://www.state.nj.us/dca/divisions/dlgs/programs/lpcl_docs/Taking_Advantage_of_Lower_Electric_Rates_for_your_Government_Agency.pdf

1. Cooperative Purchasing

“When local governments put aside provincial interests in exchange for the broader benefits to be achieved through Cooperative Purchasing, they can secure the provision and performance of goods and services at a lower cost. Cooperative Purchasing has demonstrated a strong ability to serve as an effective tool to assist local officials save taxpayer dollars. Cooperative Purchasing represents viable alternatives to the conventional “go-it-alone” bidding process. “ Many Cooperatives in the state utilize online bidding to secure attractive electricity and natural gas supply service. Utilizing a Cooperative is highly recommended. Benefits can include:



• Increase staff effectiveness • Reduce duplication of bidding and contract processing • Reduce time, effort and costs associated with developing and managing the bid process • Leverage established and large volume pricing of contracted products • Great alternative contract option to save time, money and ensure quality products &

services

2. Online Reverse Auctions and Online Sealed Bids

“For local government entities, the requirement to bid does not mean the solicitation of quotes; it means a formal process where there is a bid specification, notice to bidders, and a level playing field for all potential bidders. The Division’s E-Procurement Pilot program (authorized under P.L. 2001, c. 30) allows local units to purchase commodities and services, including energy supply, through online bidding and reverse auctions programs approved by the Division. Any online organization participating in the online pilot program must be approved by the Division. Once the Division has approved an online service, any local unit can take advantage of the service. When conducted through an online service, however, the local unit is responsible to ensure that the online service is operating consistent with procurement laws for an individual procurement.”

Both online reverse auctions and online sealed bids can produce significant cost savings results. The process is transparent and seamless. Many platforms are very flexible allowing for full customization to meet the Client’s needs.

All providers of online reverse auction and online bidding charge a fee indirectly to LGE’s. The fee is included in the bid pricing shown by suppliers as a $/kWh or $/therm charge and paid directly by the supplier to the vendor. Although LGE’s do not have to formally bid for this type of service should they utilize a DCA pre-approved vendor, we would recommend that any and all fees paid by the supplier to the vendor be disclosed prior to any engagement of services. An overview of both the Online Reverse Auction vs Sealed bid format was published in the NJBIZ Spring of 2007. To view this article, please go to web link: http://www.nbizmag.com/magarticles/sealedbidvsreverseauction.pdf Benefits can include:

• Provides full transparency during the procurement process with unbiased decision making

• Drives prices down through real-time competition • Allows client to actively participate during the entire auction or online bidding process • Execution of contracts are completed within hours of the auction’s close • Places the focus for suppliers solely on price, since all other factors and related

contracting documentation is received and pre-qualified before the final auction bid due date

• Full audit and archival capabilities to substantiate award decisions



• Improves knowledge capture, transfer and re-use capabilities

3. Traditional Sealed Bid Format

This type of bid format is not endorsed by the Division of Local Government Services for the bidding of power supply. However, in a recent review of bidding methodologies and which methodology would likely to produce lower cost results, a NJ Government Agency allowed suppliers to choose the bidding format. The bidding options allowed were either via an Online Reverse Auction or via a Traditional Sealed Bid. The Agency understood that many suppliers will not participate in an online auction format or methodology and wanted to allow all NJBPU suppliers to participate. The Agency is the 2nd largest Cooperative in the state which includes participants from five Counties and over 200 municipalities. After the online reverse auction bid was closed and the traditional sealed bids opened and reviewed, the Agency awarded the electricity contract to a bidder that was the lowest price and submitted their bid via the Traditional Sealed Bid Format. The below recommendations presented by Concord Engineering are based on current information provided by the owner for their facilities historical energy usage. Any savings presented with these recommendations are estimates only based on that information. It is recommended that further analysis and review of more recent utility data and actual TPS electricity and natural gas supply contracts and historical billings be performed prior to performing any of the presented recommendations. Recommendations: 1. Concord recommends the owner investigate 3rd party commodity supply procurement

strategies for the purchase of electricity and natural gas. Aggregating the usage of all facilities for both electricity and natural gas supply service, allows the owner to continue to achieve lower prices in commodity supply costs over the utility default service programs. Energy commodities are among the most volatile of all commodities, however at this point and time, energy is extremely competitive and contract terms longer than 12 months are desirable. Contracts due to expire in the near term would continue to yield very favorable pricing. It is important to aggregate usage where available and take advantage of these current market prices quickly, before energy increases.

2. After review of the utility consumption report and current commodity pricing outlook, Concord recommends that the owner utilize the advisement of a 3rd party unbiased Energy Consulting Firm licensed by the State of New Jersey Board of Public Utilities that is experienced in the procurement of commodities, New Jersey procurement laws, aggregation of facilities and energy supply risk and commodity management. This firm should be able to provide full service advisement over the term of the contract, provide market watch opportunities and identify any additional opportunities that may further reduce costs. Many of these opportunities may include: energy rates; utility bill auditing; energy data analytics; and efficiency improvements.



It is important that a rational, defensible strategy for purchasing commodity in volatile markets is incorporated. Examples include:

Budgets that reflect sound market intelligence An understanding of utility and market historical prices and trends Awareness of seasonal opportunities (e.g. shoulder months) Negotiation of fair contractual terms An aggressive, market based price

3. Concord also recommends that the owner consider utilizing a third party utility billing-

auditing service to further analyze historical utility invoices such as water, sewer, natural gas, electricity and solar for incorrect billings and rate tariff optimization services. This service can be based on a shared savings model with no direct cost. The service could provide refunds on potential incorrect billings that may have been passed through by the utilities and paid by the owner.



PJM Demand Response Programs Demand response programs may not fit or be applicable to all clients, however if there is an opportunity to shed load, typically above 100 kilowatts, while not having significant impacts on operations and comfort conditions it could warrant consideration. Concord recommends the owner review the program description below from PJM to see if there is a potential fit, as it can become a substantial revenue source dependent on your ability to curtail. Given the low demand profile it is unlikely the District would be able to realize significant benefit from these programs. What is PJM? PJM Interconnection is a regional transmission organization that coordinates the movement of wholesale electricity in all parts of 13 states and the District of Columbia. As an independent party, PJM operates a competitive wholesale electricity market and manages the high-voltage electricity grid to ensure reliability for more than 51 million people. PJM’s long-term planning process take a broad, interstate perspective that identifies the most effective and cost efficient improvements to the grid to ensure reliability and economic benefits on the system as a whole. PJM’s “Wholesale” market is focused on entities that buy and sell the electricity, but are not the end consumers of the electricity. The retail market is focused on entities that buy electricity from the wholesale market or produce the electricity, and then sell the electricity to a customer that physically consumes it. PJM does not interact directly with the electricity consumers, but with the companies (or Utility) that provides the electricity to consumers. What is Demand Response? Demand Response is a consumer’s ability to reduce electricity consumption at their location when wholesale prices are high or the reliability of the electric grid is threatened. Common examples of demand response include: raising the temperature of the thermostat so the air conditioner does not run as frequently, slowing down or stopping production at an industrial operation or dimming/shutting off lights, basically any explicit action taken to reduce load in response to short-term high prices or a signal from PJM. Demand Response does not include the reduction of electricity consumption based on normal operating practice or behavior. For example, if a company’s normal schedule is to close for a holiday, the reduction of electricity due to this closure or scaled-back operation is not considered a demand response activity in most situations. Retail Customer Program Offerings: PJM’s demand response opportunities enables retail electricity consumers to earn a revenue stream for reducing electricity consumption when either wholesale prices are high or the reliability of the electric grid is threatened. Demand response participation is broken in two broad classifications, Economic and Emergency. An electricity consumer may participate in either or both depending on the circumstances.



Emergency Demand Response primarily represents a mandatory commitment to reduce load or only consume electricity up to a certain level when PJM needs assistance to maintain reliability under supply shortage or expected emergency operation conditions. This is considered a mandatory commitment to which penalties will be applied for non-compliance. The consumer’s resources must be available to respond to PJM’s request to reduce load where the availability depends on the product selected, as follows: Limited DR – resource is available for up to 10 weekdays from June through September,

where each request may be up to six hours in duration. Extended Summer DR – resources is available for all days from May through October,

where each request may be up to ten hours in duration Annual DR - resources is available for all days from June through May of following year,

where each request may be up to ten hours in duration PJM considers these resources similar to a generator and fully expects them to perform at the time when the grid most needs it to avoid brownouts and/or rolling blackouts within the PJM service territory. The revenue stream derived from participation is largely driven by the “Capacity” market as defined under the Reliability Pricing Model (RPM). The revenue earned is a function of the relevant RPM price and the load reduction commitment. The resource is paid to be “available” during expected emergency conditions on a monthly basis for a commitment that is made for one year, which starts on June 1 and ends on May 31 of the following year. Emergency demand response also has the opportunity to participate on a voluntary basis. Under this option, the resources have the option to participate when an emergency is called and will be compensated based on the amount of energy reduced during the emergency. Such resources will not receive revenue from the capacity market. Economic Demand Response primarily represents a voluntary commitment to reduce load in the energy market when the wholesale price is higher than the published monthly PJM net benefits price. The net benefit price represents the price at which the benefits incurred by a reduction in wholesale prices from the economic demand response will exceed the cost to pay for the economic demand response. The economic demand response will be used to displace a generation resource and PJM expect the resource to perform and will assess deviation charges if the amount of load reductions realized is significantly different than the amount of load reductions dispatched by PJM. An economic demand response resource may also provide Ancillary Services to the wholesale market with the appropriate infrastructure and qualification by PJM. There are three Ancillary Services markets in which economic demand response resources may participate: Synchronized Reserves (the ability to reduce electricity consumption within 10 minutes of PJM dispatch), Day Ahead Scheduling Reserves (the ability to reduce electricity consumption within 30 minutes of



PJM dispatch) and Regulation (the ability to follow PJM’s regulation and frequency response signal). Participation in the market is voluntary; however, if a resource clears, performance is mandatory. How to Participate? The first step for a consumer interested in demand response is to contact a Curtailment Service Provider(s) to get a more in-depth understanding of the opportunities and determine whether you have the capability to participate. A list of Curtailment Service Providers is available on PJM’s Web site at Markets & Operations > Demand Response > Curtailment Service Providers (www.pjm.com/markets-and-operations/demand-response/csps.aspx). The list includes contact names at the firms; it also indicates in what states the firms do business. PJM also posts on its website the training materials developed for its members who are interested in the rules and requirements for demand response activity at http://www.pjm.com/training/training-material.aspx, along with a variety of demand response information at http://www.pjm.com/markets-and-operations/demand-response.aspx.



X. INSTALLATION FUNDING OPTIONS CEG has reviewed various funding options for the District to utilize in subsidizing the costs for installing the energy conservation measures noted within this report. Below are a few alternative funding methods: A. Incentive Programs: Pay For Performance (www.njcleanenergy.com/commercial-industrial/programs/pay-performance) The New Jersey Smart Start Pay for Performance Program includes incentives based on savings resulted from implemented ECMs. The program is available for all buildings that were audited as part of the NJ Clean Energy’s Local Government Energy Audit Program. The facility’s participation in the program is assisted by an approved program partner. An “Energy Reduction Plan” is created with the facility and approved partner to shown at least 15% reduction in the building’s current energy use. Multiple energy conservation measures implemented together are applicable toward the total savings of at least 15%. No more than 50% of the total energy savings can result from lighting upgrades / changes. Total incentive is capped at 50% of the project cost. The program savings is broken down into three benchmarks; Energy Reduction Plan, Project Implementation, and Measurement and Verification. Each step provides additional incentives as the energy reduction project continues. The benchmark incentives are as follows:

1. Energy Reduction Plan – Upon completion of an energy reduction plan by an approved program partner, the incentive will grant $0.10 per square foot between $5,000 and $50,000, and not to exceed 50% of the facility’s annual energy expense. (Benchmark #1 is capped at 50% of this value if the entity has completed a local government energy audit.)

2. Project Implementation – Upon installation of the recommended measures along with the “Substantial Completion Construction Report,” the incentive will grant savings per KWH or Therm based on the program’s rates. Minimum saving must be 15%. (Example $0.11 / kWh for 15% savings, $0.12/ kWh for 17% savings, … and $1.10 / Therm for 15% savings, $1.20 / Therm for 17% saving, …) Increased incentives result from projected savings above 15%.

3. Measurement and Verification – Upon verification 12 months after implementation of all recommended measures, that actual savings have been achieved, based on a completed verification report, the incentive will grant additional savings per kWh or Therm based on the program’s rates. Minimum savings must be 15%. (Example $0.07 / kWh for 15% savings, $0.08/ kWh for 17% savings, … and $0.70 / Therm for 15% savings, $0.80 / Therm for 17% saving, …) Increased incentives result from verified savings above 15%.



Based on the combined project outlined in Table 4 above, the facility could potentially qualify for additional incentives through the P4P Program. The following is a breakdown of the estimated incentives that could be available.

Direct Install Program (www.njcleanenergy.com/commercial-industrial/programs/direct-install) The New Jersey Clean Energy’s Direct Install Program is a state funded program that targets small commercial and industrial facilities with peak demand of less than 200 kW. This turnkey program is aimed at providing owners a seamless, comprehensive process for analysis, equipment replacement and financial incentives to reduce consumption, lower utility costs and improve profitability. The program covers up to 70% of the cost for eligible upgrades including lighting, lighting controls, refrigeration, HVAC, motors, variable speed drives, natural gas and food service. Participating contractors (refer to www.njcleanenergy.com) conduct energy assessments in addition to your standard local government energy audit and install the cost-effective measures. The H.W. Mountz School qualifies for the Direct Install Program based on current program criteria. Smart Start Program (www.njcleanenergy.com/commercial-industrial/programs/nj-smartstart-buildings/nj-smartstart-buildings) Prescriptive Measures - The New Jersey Clean Energy’s Smart Start prescriptive measures incentives include unit pricing incentives for installation of energy efficient equipment and controls. Proposed equipment and controls must meet the minimum efficiency requirements as well as other application requirements. The Smart Start prescriptive incentives applicable for new construction, renovations, remodeling and equipment replacements, for a wide range of equipment including:

Electric Savings (kWh) 111,210

Gas Savings (therm) 8,777

Energy Reduction 31.3%

Incentive #1 $2,500

Incentive #2 $20,308

Incentive #3 $20,308

Total P4P Incentives $43,116

POTENTIAL P4P INCENTIVES



Electric Chillers Gas Cooling Electric Unitary HVAC Ground Source Heat Pumps Gas Heating Variable Frequency Drives Gas Water Heating Premium Motors Prescriptive Lighting Lighting Controls Technical Studies

Custom Measures - The New Jersey Clean Energy’s Smart Start prescriptive measures incentives include all measures not identified in the prescriptive measures category or measures that must have savings verified through additional analysis such as energy model simulations. Custom measures are intended to include savings as a result of unique energy efficiency measures, which are typically facility specific such as waste heat recovery. Custom incentives are provided based on the amount of energy saved and minimum internal rate of return in order to be eligible. B. Financing Options: The following section outlines various funding mechanisms available to fund energy efficiency projects. It is the local government unit’s responsibility to verify these funding sources adhere to all required federal, state, and local finance laws. Municipal Bonds Municipal bonds are a bond issued by a city or other local government, or their agencies. Potential issuers of municipal bonds include cities, counties, redevelopment agencies, school districts, publicly owned airports and seaports, and any other governmental entity (or group of governments) below the state level. Municipal bonds may be general obligations of the issuer or secured by specified revenues. Interest income received by holders of municipal bonds is often exempt from the federal income tax and from the income tax of the state in which they are issued, although municipal bonds issued for certain purposes may not be tax exempt. Municipal Lease Purchase (Long-term Municipal Lease Agreements) A Municipal Lease is a contract that has many of the characteristics of a standard commercial lease, with three primary differences. In a Municipal Lease, the intent of the lessee is to purchase and take title to the equipment. The financing is a full payout contract with no significant residual or balloon payments at the end of the lease term. The lease payments include the return of principal and interest, with the interest being exempt from Federal income taxation to the recipient. Typically, a tax-exempt interest transaction will be financed at interest rates lower than equivalent commercial financing. The Municipal Lease provides for termination for non-appropriation of funds by the Government Agency. A Municipal Lease offers several



advantages over alternative methods of financing such as simplicity, speed of delivery, non-appropriation, buyout terms, and cost. Under most state statutes, municipal contracts with terms of over one year require significant investments in time and money in order to comply with municipal debt restrictions. Since a Municipal Lease is, in effect, a year-to-year obligation, many of these requirements do not apply. The ease of executing a Municipal Lease minimizes the elapsed time and the expenses associated with issuing any kind of certificate of indebtedness or bond. Lease to Own (Leaseback) A lease to own arrangement is where the seller of an asset (i.e. building, equipment, etc.) leases back the same asset from the purchaser. In a leaseback arrangement, the specifics of the arrangement are made immediately after the sale of the asset, with the amount of the payments and the time period specified. Essentially, the seller of the asset becomes the lessee and the purchaser becomes the lessor in this arrangement. A leaseback arrangement is useful when entities need to un-tie the cash invested in an asset for other investments, but the asset is still needed in order to operate. Leaseback deals can also provide the seller with additional tax deductions. The lessor benefits in that they will receive stable payments for a specified period of time. Power Purchase Agreement Public Law 2008, Chapter 3 authorizes contracts of up to fifteen (15) years for energy purchase contracts commonly known as “power purchase agreements.” These are programs where the contracting unit (Owner) procures a contract for, in most cases, a third party to install, maintain, and own a renewable energy system. These renewable energy systems are typically solar panels, windmills or other systems that create renewable energy. In exchange for the third party’s work of installing, maintaining and owning the renewable energy system, the contracting unit (Owner) agrees to purchase the power generated by the renewable energy system from the third party at agreed upon energy rates. On-Bill Financing On-bill financing allows a loan for energy efficiency measures to be repaid over time via an additional line item on the recipient’s utility bill, which decreases repayment risk for the lender. The lender in “classic” utility on-bill financing has traditionally been the utility itself. Hybrid models have also emerged in which public and private funds are pooled to offer low-interest loans, with repayment similarly attached to the utility bill. The utility then collects the payment and returns it to the lender, which lowers the lender’s administrative costs. The utility customer benefits from lower energy costs after retrofits, and typically pays loans back over a period of about 2–5 years. This model has also recently become available with Third Party Commodity Suppliers allowing for energy efficiency project funding to be rolled into their bill for the customer. If the owner is interested in this funding mechanism they should contact their local utility or third party supplier if any such program is offered. Alternatively if the owner’s current third party supply contract is expiring this could be included as an option when bidding for new suppliers.



Public-Private Partnerships A public-private partnership is a business relationship between a public entity and a private-sector company for the purpose of completing a project that will serve the public. These types of partnerships can be used to finance, build, and operate various types of projects such as public transportation networks, new buildings, parks, and convention centers. In lieu the traditional path of a public entity funding the project, a private enterprise would fund it in exchange for receiving some type of financial benefit from the project once complete. Energy Savings Improvement Program (ESIP): Public Law 2009, Chapter 4 authorizes government entities to make energy related improvements to their facilities and pay for the costs using the value of energy savings that result from the improvements. The “Energy Savings Improvement Program (ESIP)” law provides a flexible approach that can allow all government agencies in New Jersey to improve and reduce energy usage with minimal expenditure of new financial resources. This program provides public entities to make valuable facility infrastructure improvements that are associated with energy savings. All energy savings projects are eligible as long as the financing period does not extend beyond 15 years. The financing can be utilized for all aspects of energy efficiency project implementation including, energy savings plan development, engineering, construction management, construction management, commissioning, and measurement and verification. This program provides the much needed financing for energy efficiency projects without the burden of increased debt. The program allows for procurement of financing without voter approval or extending existing debt. The program requires evaluation to ensure a positive cash-flow through the entire 15 year financing period. The first phase of implementing an ESIP is the development of an Energy Savings Plan (ESP) to verify the energy savings, construction costs, and overall financial model.



XI. ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS In addition to the ECMs and REMs, there are maintenance and operational measures that can provide significant energy savings and provide immediate benefit, many of which facility’s staff are already performing. Maintenance items and small operational improvements are typically achievable with on-site staff or maintenance contractors and in turn have the potential to provide substantial operational savings compared to the costs associated. The following are recommendations which should be considered a priority in achieving an energy efficient building.

A. Maintain all weather stripping on windows and doors.

B. Clean all light fixtures to maximize light output.

C. Provide more frequent air filter changes to decrease overall system power usage and maintain better Indoor Air Quality (IAQ).

D. Shutdown all non-essential equipment during unoccupied periods.



XII. ENERGY AUDIT ASSUMPTIONS The assumptions utilized in this energy audit include but are not limited to following:

A. Cost Estimates noted within this report are based on industry accepted costing data such as RS MeansTM Cost Data, contractor pricing and engineering estimates. All cost estimates for this level of auditing are +/- 20%. Prevailing wage rates for the specified region has been utilized to calculate installation costs. The cost estimates indicated within this audit should be utilized by the owner for prioritizing further project development post the energy audit. Project development would include investment grade auditing and detailed engineering.

B. Energy savings noted within this audit are calculated utilizing industry standard procedures and accepted engineering assumptions. For this level of auditing, energy savings are not guaranteed.

C. Information gathering for each facility is strongly based on interviews with operations personnel. Information dependent on verbal feedback is used for calculation assumptions including but not limited to the Operating Hours, Equipment Type, Control Strategies, and Scheduling.

D. Information contained within the major equipment list is based on the existing owner documentation where available (drawings, O&M manuals, etc.). If existing owner documentation is not available, catalog information is utilized to populate the required information.

E. Equipment incentives and energy credits are based on current pricing and status of rebate programs. Rebate availability is dependent on the individual program funding and applicability. It is the owner’s responsibility to ensure installed measure equipment meets NJOCE program rules and requirements to receive incentives.

F. Equipment (HVAC, Plumbing, Electrical, & Lighting) noted within an ECM recommendation is strictly noted as a basis for calculation of energy savings. The owner should use this equipment information as a benchmark when pursuing further investment grade project development and detailed engineering for specific energy conservation measures.

G. Utility bill annual averages are utilized for calculation of all energy costs unless otherwise noted. Accuracy of the utility energy usage and costs are based on the information provided. Utility information including usage and costs is estimated where incomplete data is provided.

H. Greenhouse Gas Emissions are calculated for each ECM, the basis for these emissions reductions are NJCEP published standard emissions factors, which are the following:.

a. Electric Savings: 1. CO2: 1.52 lbs/kWh 2. NOX: 0.0028 lbs/kWh 3. SO2: 0.0065 lbs/kWh

b. Natural Gas Savings: 1. CO2: 11.7 lbs/therm 2. NOX: 0.0092 lbs/therm

Appendix Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc.

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX A1 of 1

LIFETIME ENERGY SAVINGS

LIFETIME MAINTENANCE

SAVINGSLIFETIME ROI SIMPLE PAYBACK

INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN (IRR)

NET PRESENT VALUE (NPV)

MATERIAL LABORREBATES,

INCENTIVES

NET INSTALLATION

COSTENERGY MAINT. / SREC TOTAL (Yearly Saving * ECM Lifetime)

(Yearly Maint Svaing * ECM Lifetime)

(Lifetime Savings - Net Cost) / (Net Cost)

(Net cost / Yearly Savings)

($) ($) ($) ($) ($/Yr) ($/Yr) ($/Yr) (Yr) ($) ($) (%) (Yr) ($) ($)

ECM #1 Interior Lighting Upgrades (No Gym) $49,382 $32,505 $8,955 $72,932 $6,607 $0 $6,607 15 $99,105 $0 35.9% 11.0 4.10% $5,941.94

ECM #2 Exterior Lighting Upgrades $1,701 $810 $900 $1,611 $253 $0 $253 15 $3,795 $0 135.6% 6.4 13.29% $1,409.30

ECM #3 Interior Lighting Controls $1,200 $300 $0 $1,500 $75 $0 $75 15 $1,125 $0 -25.0% 20.0 -3.40% ($604.65)

ECM #4 Replace Lobby Ceiling Cabinet Heaters $2,500 $2,000 $0 $4,500 $370 $0 $370 20 $7,400 $0 64.4% 12.2 5.29% $1,004.67

ECM #5 Rooftop Unit Replacements $15,500 $23,447 $852 $38,095 $1,038 $0 $1,038 15 $15,570 $0 -59.1% 36.7 -9.54% ($25,703.42)

ECM #6 Replace Air-Cooled Chiller $42,000 $48,068 $800 $89,268 $3,833 $0 $3,833 25 $95,825 $0 7.3% 23.3 0.55% ($22,523.40)

ECM #7 Replace Older Unit Ventilators $44,000 $38,500 $0 $82,500 $1,180 $0 $1,180 20 $23,600 $0 -71.4% 69.9 -9.78% ($64,944.58)

ECM #8 Gym De-Stratification Fans $8,000 $6,000 $0 $14,000 $1,264 $0 $1,264 15 $18,960 $0 35.4% 11.1 4.05% $1,089.55

ECM #9 Upgrade to Full DDC System $36,000 $53,000 $0 $89,000 $3,697 $0 $3,697 15 $55,455 $0 -37.7% 24.1 -5.40% ($44,865.45)

ECM #10 Premium Efficiency Motors $960 $700 $0 $1,660 $46 $0 $46 15 $690 $0 -58.4% 36.1 -9.39% ($1,110.85)

ECM #11 VFD on Hot Water Pump $10,800 $16,325 $0 $27,125 $524 $0 $524 15 $7,860 $0 -71.0% 51.8 -12.58% ($20,869.52)

ECM #12 New Condensing Boilers $84,230 $114,205 $4,000 $194,435 $4,299 $0 $4,299 20 $85,980 $0 -55.8% 45.2 -6.77% ($130,476.74)

ECM #13 ECM on Smaller Exhaust Fans $5,175 $4,082 $0 $9,257 $605 $0 $605 15 $9,075 $0 -2.0% 15.3 0% ($2,034.55)

ECM #14 Water Conservation Measures $5,982 $7,551 $0 $13,533 $898 $0 $898 15 $13,470 $0 -0.5% 15.1 -0.06% ($2,812.73)

ECM #15 On-Demand, Gas-Fired Water Heaters $7,832 $7,104 $360 $14,576 $606 $0 $606 20 $12,120 $0 -16.8% 24.1 -1.70% ($5,560.25)

REM #1 80 kW Solar Array $218,523 $145,682 $0 $364,205 $13,804 $15,155 $28,959 15 $434,383 $227,322 19.3% 12.6 2.29% ($18,495.67)

Notes: 1) The variable Cn in the formulas for Internal Rate of Return and Net Present Value stands for the cash flow during each period.2) The variable DR in the NPV equation stands for Discount Rate3) For NPV and IRR calculations: From n=0 to N periods where N is the lifetime of ECM and Cn is the cash flow during each period .

REM RENEWABLE ENERGY AND FINANCIAL COSTS AND SAVINGS SUMMARY

ECM COST & SAVINGS BREAKDOWN

CONCORD ENGINEERING

Spring Lake Board of Education - H.W. Mountz School

INSTALLATION COST YEARLY SAVINGS

ECM LIFETIMEDESCRIPTIONECM NO.

ECM ENERGY AND FINANCIAL COSTS AND SAVINGS SUMMARY



APPENDIX B

Appendix B Page 1 of 6

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 520 BURNT MILL ROAD VOORHEES, NEW JERSEY 08043 PHONE: (856) 427-0200 FAX: (856) 427-6508

SmartStart Building Incentives The NJ SmartStart Buildings Program offers financial incentives on a wide variety of building system equipment. The incentives were developed to help offset the initial cost of energy-efficient equipment. The following tables show the current available incentives from July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016, further details including how to apply, forms, and calculated incentive values can be found the Clean Energy Website. (www.njcleanenergy.com)

Electric Chillers

Water-Cooled Chillers

Constant Speed: Base: $8 - $30 per ton

Performance Add: $2 - $2.25 per ton Variable Speed:

Base: $12 - $44 per ton Performance Add: $2 - $4.00 per ton

Air-Cooled Chillers

Constant Speed: Base: $20 per ton

Performance Add: $3.50 per ton Variable Speed:

Base: $90 - $92 per ton Performance Add: $4.00 per ton

Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2013

Gas Cooling Gas Absorption Chillers (Indirect & Direct-Fired)

$185 - $450 per ton

Desiccant Systems

$1.00 per cfm – gas or electric

Electric Unitary HVAC

Unitary AC and Split Systems $73 - $92 per ton Air-to-Air Heat Pumps $73 - $92 per ton

Water-Source Heat Pumps $81 per ton Packaged Terminal AC & HP $65 per ton

Central DX AC Systems $40- $72 per ton Dual Enthalpy Economizer Controls $250 Occupancy Controlled Thermostat

(Hospitality & Institutional Facility) $75 per thermostat

A/C Economizing Controls < 5 tons $85/unit; >5 tons $170/unit Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2007


Gas Heating

Hot Water Gas Fired Boilers < 300 MBH

Non-Condensing: $0.95 per MBH,

Minimum $400 per unit Condensing:

$2.00 per MBH, Minimum $1000 per unit

Hot Water Gas Fired Boilers ≥ 300 - 1500 MBH

Non-Condensing: $1.75 per MBH

Condensing: $2.20 per MBH

Minimum $1000 per unit

Hot Water Gas Fired Boilers >1500 - ≤ 2500 MBH



Hot Water Gas Fired Boilers >2500 - ≤ 4000 MBH



Steam, Except Natural Draft, Gas fired Boilers < 300 MBH


Steam, Except Natural Draft, Gas fired Boilers ≥ 300 – 1500 MBH

$1.20 per MBH

Steam, Except Natural Draft, Gas fired Boilers > 1500 – 2500 MBH

$1.20 per MBH

Steam, Except Natural Draft, Gas fired Boilers > 2500 – 4000 MBH

$1.00 per MBH

Steam, Natural Draft < 300 MBH


Steam, Natural Draft ≥ 300 - 1500 MBH

$1.00 per MBH

Steam, Natural Draft >1500 - ≤ 2500 MBH

$0.90 per MBH

Steam, Natural Draft >2500 - ≤ 4000 MBH

$0.70 per MBH

All Types Gas Fired Boilers > 4000 MBH

(Calculated through Custom Measure Path)

Gas Furnaces $400 per unit, AFUE ≥ 95%

Boiler Economizing Controls $1,200 - $2,700

Low Intensity Infrared Heating $300 - $500 per unit

Natural Gas Water Heating Gas Water Heaters ≤ 50 gallons, 0.67

energy factor or better $50 per unit

Gas-Fired Water Heaters > 50 gallons $1.00 - $2.00 per MBH

Gas-Fired Booster Water Heaters $17 - $35 per MBH

Gas Fired Tankless Water Heaters $300 per unit


Ground Source Heat Pumps

Closed Loop $450 per ton, EER ≥ 16 $600 per ton, EER ≥ 18 $750 per ton, EER ≥ 20

Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2007

Variable Frequency Drives Variable Air Volume $65 - $155 per hp

Chilled-Water Pumps ≥ 20 hp $60 per VFD rated hp

Rotary Screw Air Compressors ≥ 25 hp $5,250 to $12,500 per drive Centrifugal Fan Applications on

Constant Volume HVAC Systems $80 per VFD rated hp, maximum

$6,000 per drive Cooling Towers ≥ 10 hp $60 per VFD rated hp

Boiler Fans > 5 HP $65 to $155 per hp

Boiler Feed Water Pumps > 5 HP $60 to $155 per hp

Commercial Kitchen Hood up to 50 HP Retrofit $55 – $300 per hp

New Hood $55 - $250 per hp

Prescriptive Lighting

T-8 reduced Wattage (28w/25w 4’, 1-4 lamps)

Lamp & ballast replacement $10 per fixture

For retrofit of T-8 fixtures by permanent de-lamping & new reflectors

(Electronic ballast replacement required)

$5 per fixture

T-5 and T-8 High Bay Fixtures $25 - $150 per fixture

HID ≥ 100w Replace with new induction fixture.

(must be 30% less watts/fixture than HID system)

$70 per fixture

HID ≥ 100w Retrofit with induction lamp, power coupler and generator

(must be 30% less watts/fixture than HID system)

$50 per fixture


Prescriptive Lighting - LED

LED Architectural Floor and Spot Luminaires

$50 per fixture

LED Bollard Fixtures $50 per fixture

LED Display Case Lighting $30 per display case

LED Fuel Pump Canopy $100 per fixture

LED High-Bay and Low-Bay Fixtures for Commercial & Industrial Bldgs.

$150 per fixture

LED High-Bay-Aisle Lighting $150 per fixture

LED Linear Ambient Luminaires (Indirect, Indirect/Direct, Direct/Indirect, Direct)

2’ Fixtures - $20/fixture 3’ Fixtures - $30/fixture 4’ Fixtures - $45/fixture 6’ Fixtures - $60/fixture 8’ Fixtures - $75/fixture

LED Linear Replacement Lamps (2’ & 4’ only)

$5 per lamp

Luminaires for Ambient Lighting of Interior Commercial Spaces

(1x4, 2x2, 2x4 New Fixtures and Retrofit Kits)

1x4 LED - $15 per fixture 2x2 LED - $15 per fixture 2x4 LED - $25 per fixture

LED Outdoor Pole/Arm-Mounted Area and Roadway Luminaries

$100 per fixture

LED Outdoor Pole/Arm-Mounted Decorative Luminaries

$50 per fixture

LED Outdoor Wall-Mounted Area Luminaries

$100 per fixture

LED Parking Garage Luminaries $100 per fixture

LED Retrofit Kits for Large Outdoor Pole / Arm-Mounted Area and

Roadway Luminaires $150 per fixture

LED Refrigerator/Freezer case lighting replacement of fluorescent in medium

and low temperature display case

$30 per 4 foot $42 per 5 foot $65 per 6 foot

LED Shelf-Mtd. Display & Task Lights $15 per linear foot


LED Stairwell and Passageway Luminaires

$40 per fixture

LED Track or Mono-Point Directional Lighting Fixtures

$30 per fixture

LED Wall-Wash Lights $30 per fixture

EnergyStar Commercial Lighting Fixtures

$5 to $10 per fixture

EnergyStar Screw and Pine-Based Bulbs

$5 to $10 per lamp

Lighting Controls – Occupancy Sensors

Wall Mounted (Existing Facilities Only)

$20 per control

Remote Mounted (Existing Facilities Only)

$35 per control

Daylight Dimming Controls $45 per fixture controlled

Occupancy Based hi-low Dimming Control

$35 per fixture controlled

Occupancy Sensor Remote Mounted High-Bay (Existing Facilities Only)

$35 per control

Refrigeration Doors/Covers

Energy-Efficient Doors/Covers for Installation on Open Refrigerated Cases

$100 per door

Aluminum Night Curtains for Installation on Open Refrigerated Cases

$3.50 per linear foot

Refrigeration Controls

Door Heater Controls $50 per control Electric Defrost Controls $50 per control Evaporator Fan Controls $75 per control Novelty Cooler Shutoff $50 per control

Refrigerator / Freezer Case Premium Efficiency Motors

Fraction ECM Motor < 1 HP $40 per ECM for replacement of

existing shaded-pole motor


Food Service Equipment

Combination Oven/Steamer (Electric) $1,000/oven

Combination Oven/Steamer (Natural Gas)

$750/oven

Convection Oven (Electric) $350/oven

Convection Oven (Natural Gas) $500/oven

Rack Oven (Natural Gas) $1,000/single oven, $2,000/double oven

Conveyor Oven (Natural Gas) $500/small deck $750/large deck

Fryer (Electric) $200/vat

Fryer (Natural Gas) $749/vat

Large Vat Fryer (Electric) $200/vat

Large Vat Fryer (Natural Gas) $500/vat

Griddle (Electric) $300/griddle

Griddle (Natural Gas) $125/griddle

Steam Cooker (Electric) $1,250/steamer

Steam Cooker (Natural Gas) $2,000/steamer

Insulated Holding Cabinets $200 to $300/unit

Glass Door Refrigerators $75 to $150/unit

Solid Door Refrigerators $50 to $200/unit

Glass Door Freezers $200 to $1,000/unit

Solid Door Freezers $100 to $600/unit

Ice Machines $50 to $500/unit

Dishwashers $400 to $1,500/unit

Other Equipment Incentives

Performance Lighting

$1.00 per watt per SF below program incentive threshold, currently 5% more energy efficient than ASHRAE 90.1-

2007 for New Construction and Complete Renovation

Custom Electric and Gas Equipment Incentives

not prescriptive

Custom Measures

$0.16 KWh and $1.60/Therm of 1st year savings, or a buy down to a 1 year

payback on estimated savings. Minimum required savings of 75,000

KWh or 1,500 Therms and an IRR of at least 10%.



APPENDIX C

ENERGY STAR® Statement of EnergyPerformance

48ENERGY STAR®

Score1

H.W. Mountz School

Primary Property Function: K-12 SchoolGross Floor Area (ft²): 59,648Built: 1921

For Year Ending: May 31, 2015Date Generated: October 27, 2015

1. The ENERGY STAR score is a 1-100 assessment of a building’s energy efficiency as compared with similar buildings nationwide, adjusting forclimate and business activity.

Property & Contact Information

Property AddressH.W. Mountz School411 Tuttle AvenueSpring Lake, New Jersey 07762

Property OwnerSpring Lake Board of Education411 Tuttle AvenueSpring Lake, NJ 07762(____)____-______

Primary ContactNick Mackres411 Tuttle AvenueSpring Lake, NJ 07762(732) [email protected]

Property ID: 4611892

Energy Consumption and Energy Use Intensity (EUI)

Site EUI69.8 kBtu/ft²

Annual Energy by FuelElectric - Grid (kBtu) 1,103,321 (26%)Natural Gas (kBtu) 3,061,576 (74%)

National Median ComparisonNational Median Site EUI (kBtu/ft²) 68.9National Median Source EUI (kBtu/ft²) 110.5% Diff from National Median Source EUI 1%

Source EUI112 kBtu/ft²

Annual EmissionsGreenhouse Gas Emissions (Metric TonsCO2e/year)

310

Signature & Stamp of Verifying Professional

I ___________________ (Name) verify that the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

Signature: _______________________Date: ___________

Licensed Professional

____ ________,(____)____-________________________

Professional Engineer Stamp(if applicable)

of 7

ENERGY STAR® Data Verification Checklist

48ENERGY STAR ®

Score1

H.W. Mountz School

Registry Name: H.W. Mountz SchoolPrimary Function: K-12 SchoolGross Floor Area (ft²): 59,648Built: 1921

For Year Ending: 05/31/2015Date Generated: 10/27/2015

1. The ENERGY STAR score is a 1-to-100 assessment of a building’s energy efficiency as compared with similar building nationwide, adjusting for climate and businessactivity.

Property & Contact Information

Property AddressH.W. Mountz School411 Tuttle AvenueSpring Lake, New Jersey 07762

Property ID: 4611892

Property OwnerSpring Lake Board of Education411 Tuttle AvenueSpring Lake, NJ 07762(____)____-______

Primary ContactNick Mackres411 Tuttle AvenueSpring Lake, NJ 07762(732) [email protected]

1. Review of Whole Property Characteristics

Basic Property Information

1) Property Name: H.W. Mountz School

Is this the official name of the property?

If “No”, please specify: _____________________________________

Yes No

2) Primary Function: K-12 School

Is this an accurate description of the primary use of this property? Yes No

3) Location:

411 Tuttle AvenueSpring Lake, New Jersey 07762

Is this correct and complete?

Yes No

4) Gross Floor Area: 59,648 ft² Yes No

of 7

Does this represent the entire property? (i.e., no part of the building/property wasexcluded/subtracted from the total) If “no” please specify what space has been excluded.

5) Average Occupancy: 100

Is this occupancy accurate for the entire 12 month period being assessed? Yes No

6) Number of Buildings: 1

Does this number accurately represent all structures? Yes No

Notes:

Indoor Environmental Standards

1) Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality

Does this property meet the ASHRAE Standard 62 for ventilation for acceptable indoorair quality?

Yes No

2) Acceptable Thermal Environmental Conditions

Does this property meet the ASHRAE Standard 55 for thermal comfort? Yes No

3) Adequate Illumination

Does this property adhere to the IESNA Lighting Handbook for lighting quality? Yes No

Notes:

2. Review of Property Use Details

K-12 School: Building Use

This Use Detail is used to calculate the 1-100 ENERGY STAR Score.

1) Gross Floor Area: 59,648 ft²

Is this the total size, as measured between the principal exterior surfaces of theenclosing fixed walls of the building(s)? This includes all areas inside the building(s)such as: occupied tenant areas, common areas, meeting areas, break rooms,

Yes No

of 7

restrooms, elevator shafts, mechanical equipment areas, and storage rooms. GrossFloor Area should not include interstitial plenum space between floors, which may housepipes and ventilation. Gross Floor Area is not the same as rentable, but rather includesall area inside the building(s). Leasable space would be a sub-set of Gross Floor Area.In the case where there is an atrium, you should count the Gross Floor Area at thebase level only. Do not increase the size to accommodate open atrium space at higherlevels. The Gross Floor Area should not include any exterior spaces such as balconiesor exterior loading docks and driveways.

2) Gymnasium Floor Area: 0 ft²

Does the gymnasium floor area include all areas devoted to a gymnasium, includinggymnasium/athletic areas, spectator areas, locker rooms, and other associated spaces?

Yes No

3) High School: No

Is the property a high school (teaching grades 10, 11, and/or 12)? If the propertyteaches to high school students at all, the user should check ‘yes’ to ‘high school’. Forexample, if the school teaches to grades K-12 (elementary/middle and high school), theuser should check ‘yes’ to ‘high school’.

Yes No

4) Number of Workers on Main Shift: 40

Is this the number of workers present during the main shift? Note that this is not a totalcount of workers, but rather a count of workers who are present at the same time. Forexample, if there are two daily eight hour shifts of 100 workers each, the Number ofWorkers on Main Shift value is 100. Number of Workers on Main Shift may includeemployees of the property, sub-contractors who are onsite regularly, and volunteerswho perform regular onsite tasks. Number of Workers should not include visitors to thebuildings such as clients, customers, or patients.

Yes No

5) Student Seating Capacity: 212

Is this the maximum number of students for which the school was designed? Thisshould include the seating capacity of the entire school. If portable classrooms havebeen added to the school, include the capacity of these classrooms, as they expand theoverall capacity of the school.

Yes No

6) Months in Use: 10

Is this the total number of months that the property is open for standard activities? Yes No

7) Weekend Operation: No

Does the property include regular activities on the weekend beyond the scope ofmaintenance, cleaning, and security personnel? Weekend activity could include anytime when the property is used for classes, performances, or other school or communityactivities. The Yes selection is appropriate for any property that is open on one or bothdays of the weekend during one or more seasons of the year.

Yes No

8) Number of Computers: 104.38

Is this the total number of desktop computers, laptops, and data servers at the property?This number should not include tablet computers, such as iPads, or any other types ofoffice equipment. The count should only reflect computers that are owned by the school.It should not include any computers that are brought onsite by students or staff.

Yes No

9) Cooking Facilities: No

Does the property have a commercial cooking area designed to provide and serve foodto occupants and/or visitors? This may include restaurants and cafeterias. If the propertycontains only employee break room kitchens, this field should be marked No.

Yes No

of 7

10) Number of Walk-in Refrigeration/Freezer Units: 0

Is this the total count of walk-in units at the property? Walk-in Refrigeration/Freezersare typically very large units located in storage areas or commercial kitchens that wouldnot be accessible to all building occupants. This count should only include large storageunits that a person actually walks into in order to store or retrieve perishable goods.

Yes No

11) Percent That Can Be Heated: 100

Is this the total percentage of the property that can be heated by mechanical equipment? Yes No

12) Percent That Can Be Cooled: 80

Is this the total percentage of the property that can be cooled by mechanical equipment?This includes all types of cooling from central air to individual window units.

Yes No

13) School District: Not entered

Is this the administrative school district in which the property is located? Yes No

Notes:

3. Review of Energy Consumption

Data Overview

Site Energy Use SummaryElectric - Grid (kBtu) 1,103,320.8 (26%)Natural Gas (kBtu) 3,061,576 (74%)Total Energy (kBtu) 4,164,896.8

Energy IntensitySite (kBtu/ft²) 69.8Source (kBtu/ft²) 112

National Median ComparisonNational Median Site EUI (kBtu/ft²) 68.9National Median Source EUI (kBtu/ft²) 110.5% Diff from National Median SourceEUI

1.3%

Emissions (based on site energy use)Greenhouse Gas Emissions (MetricTons CO2e)

310.3

Power Generation Plant or Distribution Utility:Jersey Central Power & Light Co [FirstEnergy Corp]

Note: All values are annualized to a 12-month period. Source Energy includes energy used in generation and transmission to enable an equitable assessment.

Summary of All Associated Meters

The following meters are associated with the property, meaning that they are added together to get the total energy use for theproperty. Please see additional tables in this checklist for the exact meter consumption values.

Meter Name Fuel Type Start Date End Date Associated With

Electric Grid Meter Electric 09/20/2013 In Use H.W. Mountz School

of 7

Meter Name Fuel Type Start Date End Date Associated With

Natural Gas Natural Gas 06/12/2013 In Use H.W. Mountz School

Total Energy Use

Do the meters shown above account for the total energy use of this property during thereporting period of this application?

Yes No

Additional Fuels

Do the meters above include all fuel types at the property? That is, no additional fuels such asdistrict steam, generator fuel oil have been excluded.

Yes No

On-Site Solar and Wind Energy

Are all on-site solar and wind installations reported in this list (if present)? All on-site systemsmust be reported.

Yes No

Notes:

Electric Meter: Electric Grid Meter (kWh (thousand Watt-hours))

Associated With: H.W. Mountz SchoolStart Date End Date Usage Green Power?

05/21/2014 06/20/2014 27,520 No

06/21/2014 07/22/2014 23,360 No

07/23/2014 08/21/2014 21,760 No

08/22/2014 09/22/2014 27,840 No

09/23/2014 10/21/2014 23,360 No

10/22/2014 11/20/2014 30,080 No

11/20/2014 12/20/2014 26,560 No

12/20/2014 01/20/2015 28,480 No

01/21/2015 02/20/2015 30,080 No

02/21/2015 03/24/2015 36,160 No

03/25/2015 04/23/2015 24,320 No

04/24/2015 05/22/2015 25,600 No

05/23/2015 06/23/2015 28,480 No

of 7

Total Consumption (kWh (thousandWatt-hours)):

353,600

Total Consumption (kBtu (thousandBtu)):

1,206,483.2

Total Energy Consumption for this Meter

Do the fuel consumption totals shown above include consumption of all energy trackedthrough this meter that affect energy calculations for the reporting period of this application(i.e., do the entries match the utility bills received by the property)?

Yes No

Notes:

Natural Gas Meter: Natural Gas (therms)

Associated With: H.W. Mountz SchoolStart Date End Date Usage

06/01/2014 06/30/2014 48.23

07/01/2014 08/15/2014 36.98

08/16/2014 09/15/2014 29.34

09/16/2014 10/14/2014 15.78

10/15/2014 11/12/2014 1,424.87

11/12/2014 12/15/2014 4,305.58

12/15/2014 01/16/2015 5,928.2

01/16/2015 02/13/2015 6,185.34

02/13/2015 03/17/2015 7,677.64

03/17/2015 04/16/2015 3,741.26

04/16/2015 05/18/2015 1,196.34

05/18/2015 06/17/2015 56.15

Total Consumption (therms): 30,645.71

Total Consumption (kBtu (thousandBtu)):

3,064,571

Total Energy Consumption for this Meter

Do the fuel consumption totals shown above include consumption of all energy trackedthrough this meter that affect energy calculations for the reporting period of this application(i.e., do the entries match the utility bills received by the property)?

Yes No

of 7

Notes:

4. Signature & Stamp of Verifying Licensed Professional

___________________ (Name) visited this site on ___________ (Date). Based on the conditions observed at the timeof the visit to this property, I verify that the information contained within this application is accurate and in accordancewith the Licensed Professional Guide.

Signature: _______________________ Date: _________

Licensed Professional

____ ________,(____)____-________________________

NOTE: When applying for the ENERGY STAR, the signature of theVerifying Professional must match the stamp. Professional Engineer Stamp

(if applicable)



APPENDIX D

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering

Rooftops

Rooftop UnitsTag HVAC-1 HVAC-2 HVAC-3

Unit Type DX Cooling DX Cooling DX / Gas

Qty 1 1 1

Location 2000 Roof 2000 Roof 2000 Roof

Area Served 2nd Floor Conference Rm 1st Floor SGI Room 3rd Floor Interior Rms.

Manufacturer Carrier Carrier Carrier

Model No. 48GS-030060301 48GS-024060301 48TFE008---501KB

Serial No. 0201G10355 0101G10529 4600G34327

Cooling Type Packaged DX Packaged DX Packaged DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 2.5 2 6

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

9.7 SEER 9.7 SEER 8.9 EER

Heating Type Gas Furnace Gas Furnace Gas Furnace

Heating Input (MBH) 60 60 180

Efficiency 80.60% 80.60% 80%

Supply Fan (HP) 1/3 1/3 2

Supply Fan VFD

Return/Exhaust Fan (HP) N/A N/A N/A

Return/Exhaust Fan VFD

Approx Age 14 14 15

ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 1 1 0

Comments

Note:

"N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A Yes No N/A


Appendix D - Major Equipment List -HW Mountz Elem School Page 1 of 23


H & V Units

Heating & Ventilating UnitsTag H&V-1,2 H&V-3,4

Unit Type Heating & Ventilating Heating & Ventilating

Qty 2 2

Location GYM Locker Rooms

Area Served GYM Locker Rooms

Manufacturer - -

Model No. - -

Serial No. - -

Cooling Type N/A N/A

Cooling Capacity (Tons) N/A N/A

Heating Type Hot Water Hot Water

Heating Input (MBH) 455 MBH (Total) 105 MBH (Total)

Supply Fan (HP) 2 1

Supply Fan VFD

Return Fan (HP) N/A N/A

Return Fan VFD

Approx Age 30 30

ASHRAE Service Life 20 20

Remaining Life 0 0

Comments

Note:


Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A



Terminal Units

Terminal UnitsTag UV UV-1, 2 UV

Unit Type Unit Ventilator Unit Ventilator Unit Ventilator

Qty 4 2 3

Location 1967 ClassroomScience Room 304,

305RM 306, 214, 213

Area Served 1967 ClassroomScience Room 304,

305RM 306

Manufacturer Herman Nelson Trane Carrier

Model No.SGKBAUBAXG

41102-00VUVE15000M0N1BJA2B003MAA08231A

40UV150

Serial No. - T14F29266 W001264045

Cooling Type No Cooling Split System DX Chilled Water

Cooling Capacity (Tons) N/A 5

Cooling Efficiency N/A 13 SEER N/A

Heating Type Hot Water Hot Water Hot Water

Heating Input (MBH) - - -

Heating Efficiency Boiler (70%) Boiler (70%) Boiler (70%)

Approx Age 40 15 15



Comments

0.25 HP SF 0.5 HP Fan

Note:




Terminal Units

Terminal UnitsTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area Served

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Cooling Type

Cooling Capacity (Tons)

Cooling Efficiency

Heating Type

Heating Input (MBH)

Heating Efficiency

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments

Note:


UV UV

Unit Ventilator Unit Ventilator

2 1

RM 307 / 307A Art Rm 205

RM 307 / 307A Art Rm 205

Carrier Trane

40UV750 FSSN12H1

W001264044 S1K-224,152

Chilled Water No Cooling

N/A

N/A N/A

Hot Water Hot Water

- -

Boiler (70%) Boiler (70%)

15 30

20 20

5 0

1/3 HP Fan0.25 HP Fan

Not converted to DDC



Terminal Units

Terminal UnitsTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area Served

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Cooling Type


Cooling Efficiency

Heating Type

Heating Input (MBH)

Heating Efficiency

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments

Note:


UV

Unit Ventilator Console Unit

1 1

1971 Addition Technology Office

Technology Office

AAF-McQuay EMI

P.KS.1.014.C.Z. -

Part No. 666670500 -

No Cooling Split System DX

N/A -

N/A -

Hot Water No Heating

- N/A

Boiler (70%) N/A

13

20 20

7 20

0.25 HP Fan



Terminal Units

Terminal UnitsTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area Served

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Cooling Type


Cooling Efficiency

Heating Type

Heating Input (MBH)

Heating Efficiency

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments

Note:


Console Unit Console Unit

2 2

BOE, SBA Office Rm 201 Child Study

BOE, SBA Office Rm 201 Child Study

Fujitsu Mitsubishi

- MSZ-GE15NA

- 1004105

- AC Heatpump

- 1.25

-

- Electric Heatpump

-

- 97%

20 20

20 20



Terminal Units

Terminal UnitsTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area Served

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Cooling Type


Cooling Efficiency

Heating Type

Heating Input (MBH)

Heating Efficiency

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments

Note:


Console Unit

1

Rm 206

Rm 206

Sanyo

K3012W

0014202

AC Heatpump

No Heating

N/A

N/A

20

20



Terminal Units

Terminal UnitsTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area Served

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Cooling Type


Cooling Efficiency

Heating Type

Heating Input (MBH)

Heating Efficiency

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments

Note:


UV-11 FCU

Unit Ventilator Fan Coil

10 4

1971 Addtion CR's Main Offices

Classrooms Main Offices 1st Flr

Trane AAF-McQuay

VUVC12511F0HM PKHS1014CZ62N

W02G38853 AUBA247588

Chilled Water Chilled Water

N/A N/A

Hot Water Hot Water

- -

Boiler (70%) Boiler (70%)

13 13

20 20

7 7

0.25 HP SF 0.25 HP SF



Terminal Units

Terminal UnitsTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area Served

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Cooling Type


Cooling Efficiency

Heating Type

Heating Input (MBH)

Heating Efficiency

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments

Note:


Console Unit

1

Elevator Room

Elevator Room

Sanyo

-

-

Split System DX

1

No Heating

N/A

N/A

13

20

7



Boilers

BoilersTag B-1, 2

Unit Type Water-Tube (Water)

Qty 2

Location Boiler Room

Manufacturer Universal Boiler Works

Model No. BF200WH

Serial No. 15735-2

Input Capacity (Btu/h) 8,370,000

Output Capacity (Btu/h) 6,400,000

Approx. Efficiency % 70% (Present Condition and Age)

Fuel Type Natural Gas

Approx Age 15

ASHRAE Service Life 24

Remaining Life 9

Comments Marathon 7.5 HP Burner Motor PowerFlame Burner M/N: CR5-G-30

Note:




Chiller

ChillerTag AC-1

Unit Type Air-Cooled

Qty 1

Location 2000 Roof

Area Served 2000 Addition

Manufacturer Carrier

Model No. 30GTN035-D-500

Serial No. 4900F49452

Refrigerant R-134a

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 31

Cooling Efficiency 9.4 EER

Volts / Phase / Hz 208/230/3/60

Chilled Water GPM / ΔT 84.3 GPM/ 10°F

Condenser Water GPM / ΔT N/A

Approx Age 15


Remaining Life 5

Comments

Note:




Dom HWH

Domestic Water HeatersTag HWH

Unit Type Heater / Storage

Qty 1

Location Boiler Room

Area Served Whole Building

Manufacturer AO Smith

Model # GCV 50 300

Serial # 1330A026544

Storage Size (Gal) 50

Input Capacity (MBH/KW) 40 MBH

Recovery (Gal/Hr) 40.94

Efficiency % 80%

Fuel Natural Gas

Approx Age 2


Remaining Life 13

Comments

Note:




Pumps

PumpsTag P-4 P-1, 2

Unit Type Pipe-mounted Base-mounted

Qty 1 2

Location Room 307 Ceiling Boiler Room

System Served Primary Chilled Water Heating Hot Water

Manufacturer Bell & Gosset Taco

Model # 60 2A FE25J3E2G1G4L0

Serial # - -

Horse Power 1 1/2 5

Flow Rate (GPM) 60 180

Head Pressure (FTHD) 30 60

Motor Manufacturer - Baldor

Motor Frame - 215T

Electrical Power (V/P/HZ)

208V/3/60 208V/3/60

Motor RPM 1750 1160

Motor Efficiency % - 87.5%

Pump VFD

Approx Age 15 14

ASHRAE Service Life 18 18

Remaining Life 3 4

Comments

Note:





Pumps

PumpsTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

System Served

Manufacturer

Model #

Serial #

Horse Power

Flow Rate (GPM)

Head Pressure (FTHD)

Motor Manufacturer

Motor Frame


Motor RPM

Motor Efficiency %

Pump VFD

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments

Note:


Pa-1, and Pa-2 Heat Exchanger

Base-mounted

2 1

Boiler Room Boiler Room

Heating Hot Water Boiler DHW Exchanger

Taco Bell & Gossett

FE25J3E2G1G4L0 DWU88-44

- -

5 N/A

200 117

60 N/A

Baldor N/A

215T N/A

208V/3/60 N/A

1160 N/A

87.5% N/A

14 14

18 18

4 4

From 200°F to 170°F




Pumps

PumpsTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

System Served

Manufacturer

Model #

Serial #

Horse Power

Flow Rate (GPM)

Head Pressure (FTHD)

Motor Manufacturer

Motor Frame


Motor RPM

Motor Efficiency %

Pump VFD

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments

Note:


P-3

Pipe-mounted

1

Boiler Room

Domestic Hot Water

Bell & Gossett

60 2A

-

1

117

10

-

-

208V/3/60

1750

-

14

18

4

Yes No N/A



Condensing Units

Condensing UnitsTag CU-1, 2 CU-3, 4 MSCU-1

Unit Type Standard Air-Cooled Standard Air-Cooled Mini-Split

Qty 2 2 1


Area/Unit Served Science 304, 305 Elevator Room

Manufacturer Carrier Trane Sanyo

Model No. 38CKC060520 4TTR3060D1000NA C1211

Serial No. 4200E15698 150847975F 003754

Refrigerant Type R-22 R-410a R-22

Cooling Capacity 5 5 1

Cooling Efficiency 9.0 EER 13 SEER 10 SEER

Volts / Phase / Hz 208/230/1/60 208/230/1/60 115/1/60

Approx Age 15 1 13



CommentsIndoor Unit KS1211

Note:




Condensing Units

Condensing UnitsTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area/Unit Served

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Refrigerant Type

Cooling Capacity

Cooling Efficiency

Volts / Phase / Hz

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments

Note:


MSCU-1 CU

Heat Pump Heat Pump

1 1

1967 Roof 1971 Roof

Technology Office

Mitsubishi EMI

MXZ-3B30NA S1H4000D10

35U01622C 1-09-G-8695-32

R-410a R-22

2.5 2

17.5 SEER 13 SEER

208/230/1/60 208/230/1/60

6 6

20 20

14 14

(2) Heat Pump Indoor Units MSZ-GE15NA

Indoor Unit M/N: WLHA24



Condensing Units

Condensing UnitsTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area/Unit Served

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Refrigerant Type

Cooling Capacity

Cooling Efficiency

Volts / Phase / Hz

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments

Note:


CU

Standard Air-Cooled

1

1967 Roof

Room 207

Sanyo

K3012W

14202

R-22

28,000 BTUH

10 SEER

208/230/1/60

15

20

5

Indoor Unit M/N: K3012



Exhaust Fans

Exhaust FansTag EF-1 RF-3 TX-1

Unit Type Down Blast Down Blast Down Blast

Qty 1 1 1


Area Served Toilet Exhaust

Manufacturer Greenheck Loren Cook Lore Cook

Model # GB-071-6 245C6B 100C2B

Motor (HP) 1/4 1/2 1/6

Electrical (V/H/P) 115/60/1 115/60/1 115/60/1

Approx Age 15 15 15



Comments

Note:




Exhaust Fans

Exhaust FansTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area Served

Manufacturer

Model #

Motor (HP)

Electrical (V/H/P)

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments

Note:


EF- TX-4 TX-3

Down Blast Down Blast Down Blast

1 1 1

1967 Roof 1967 Roof 2000 Addition

Toilet Exhaust Toilet Exhaust

Dayton Loren Cook Loren Cook

4YC88G 135C10D 100C15DH

1/4 1/6 1/6

115/60/1 115/60/1 115/60/1

15 15 15

20 20 20

5 5 5



Exhaust Fans

Exhaust FansTag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Area Served

Manufacturer

Model #

Motor (HP)

Electrical (V/H/P)

Approx Age

ASHRAE Service Life

Remaining Life

Comments

Note:


RF-4 RF EF-

Down Blast Down Blast Down Blast

1 2 1

2000 Addition 1967 Roof 1967 Roof

Loren Cook Loren Cook Dayton

195C5B 120C3B 4Y88G

1/2 1/4 1/4

115/60/1 115/60/1 115/60/1

15 15 15

20 20 20

5 5 5



Kitchen-Misc

Kitchen / Misc. Tag

Unit TypeResidential Refrigerator

Elevator Hydraulic UnitResidential Refrigerator

Qty 1 1 1

Location Faculty Kitchen Elevator Mech. Room

Manufacturer Maytag Crosley

Model No. MTB2456GEW 60J CRTE181AW3

Serial No. 13213277AN CM-34824 BA80528942

Fuel Electric Electric Electric

Comments

25 HP Motor Mfg Date: 2/08

Note:




Kitchen-Misc

Kitchen / Misc. Tag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Fuel

Comments

Note:


Mini-Refrigerator

1

Faculty Kitchen

Haier

HSL04WNAWW

J2005663365

Electric




APPENDIX E

CEG Project #:

Facility Name:

Address:

City, State, Zip

Fixture Reference #

LocationAverage

Burn Hours

DescriptionLamps per

FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Work Description Equipment DescriptionLamps per

FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $

Control Ref #

Controls DescriptionQty of

Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $

Material Total Labor Total AllRebate

EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal

MaterialsTotal Labor Total All

Simple Payback

30 CR 301 16002-Lamp T8 Electronic 1x4 Pendant Prismatic

2 62 16 0.99 1,587 Re-Lamp Seesmart LED Tube 15W 4K

bypass ballast and provide new tombstones

2 30 16 0.48 768 0.51 819 $113 1Existing Occupancy

Controls0 0.0% 0 $0 $960.00 $720.00 $1,680.00 $160.00 13.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 YES -

45 CR 301 400 CFL (26W) 1 26 1 0.03 10 Existing to Remain No Change 1 26 0 0.03 10 0.00 0 $0 1Existing Occupancy

Controls0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

30 CR 302 16002-Lamp T8 Electronic 1x4 Pendant Prismatic




Controls0 0.0% 0 $0 $960.00 $720.00 $1,680.00 $160.00 13.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

65 CR 302 400 1-Lamp CFL (18W) 1 18 1 0.02 7 Existing to Remain No Change 1 18 0 0.02 7 0.00 0 $0 1Existing Occupancy

Controls0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

4 CR 303 16002-Lamp T8 Electronic

2x4 Recessed Prismatic2 62 15 0.93 1,488 Re-Lamp / Reflector

Seesmart LED Tube 15W 4Kwith semi Specular Reflector Kitbypass ballast and provide new

tombstones


Controls0 0.0% 0 $0 $900.00 $675.00 $1,575.00 $150.00 13.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -


2x4 Recessed Prismatic2 62 2 0.12 50 Re-Lamp / Reflector


tombstones


Controls0 0.0% 0 $0 $120.00 $90.00 $210.00 $20.00 53.78 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -




tombstones


Controls0 0.0% 0 $0 $720.00 $540.00 $1,260.00 $120.00 13.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

45 CR 304 400 CFL (26W) 1 26 1 0.03 10 Existing to Remain No Change 1 26 0 0.03 10 0.00 0 $0 1Existing Occupancy

Controls0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

21 Mens Rest Rm 22002-Lamp T8 Electronic

1x4 Ceiling Mounted Prismatic2 62 4 0.25 546 Re-Lamp

Seesmart LED Tube 15W 4Kbypass ballast and provide new

tombstones2 30 4 0.12 264 0.13 282 $39 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $240.00 $180.00 $420.00 $40.00 9.78 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

21 Girls Rest Rm 22002-Lamp T8 Electronic




13 Corridor 22004-Lamp T8 Electronic

2x4 Recessed Prismatic4 114 4 0.46 1,003 Re-Lamp / De-Lamp / Reflector


tombstones

3 45 4 0.18 396 0.28 607 $84 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $360.00 $180.00 $540.00 $60.00 5.73 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -




tombstones

2 30 11 0.33 726 0.35 774 $107 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $660.00 $495.00 $1,155.00 $110.00 9.78 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -


2x4 Recessed Prismatic3 93 8 0.74 1,190 Re-Lamp


tombstones3 45 8 0.36 576 0.38 614 $85 1

Existing Occupancy Controls

0 0.0% 0 $0 $720.00 $360.00 $1,080.00 $120.00 11.32 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -


1x4 Wall Mounted Prismatic2 62 1 0.06 25 Re-Lamp


tombstones2 30 1 0.03 12 0.03 13 $2 1


0 0.0% 0 $0 $60.00 $45.00 $105.00 $10.00 53.78 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -


2x4 Recessed Prismatic3 93 12 1.12 446 Re-Lamp


tombstones3 45 12 0.54 216 0.58 230 $32 1


0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,080.00 $540.00 $1,620.00 $180.00 45.29 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -




tombstones3 45 12 0.54 216 0.58 230 $32 1


0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,080.00 $540.00 $1,620.00 $180.00 45.29 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

4 Electrical Closet 26002-Lamp T8 Electronic



tombstones


21 Stair #1 22002-Lamp T8 Electronic

1x4 Ceiling Mounted Prismatic2 62 8 0.50 1,091 Re-Lamp



10 Computer Lab Rm 214 16002-Lamp T8 Electronic

1x4 Pendant Direct/Indirect2 62 12 0.74 1,190 Re-Lamp


tombstones2 30 12 0.36 576 0.38 614 $85 1


0 0.0% 0 $0 $720.00 $540.00 $1,260.00 $120.00 13.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -


4' Pendant Direct/Indirect3 93 12 1.12 1,786 Re-Lamp


tombstones3 45 12 0.54 864 0.58 922 $127 1


0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,080.00 $540.00 $1,620.00 $180.00 11.32 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -


1x4 Pendant Direct/Indirect2 62 6 0.37 595 Re-Lamp


tombstones2 30 6 0.18 288 0.19 307 $42 1


0 0.0% 0 $0 $360.00 $270.00 $630.00 $60.00 13.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -


4' Pendant Direct/Indirect3 93 9 0.84 1,339 Re-Lamp


tombstones3 45 9 0.41 648 0.43 691 $95 1


0 0.0% 0 $0 $810.00 $405.00 $1,215.00 $135.00 11.32 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

1C15355

H. W. Huntz Elementary School

LIGHTING CONTROLS COSTRETROFIT ENERGY SAVINGSEXISTING FIXTURES PROPOSED FIXTURE RETROFIT PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS LIGHTING RETROFIT COSTS

Smart Start Incentive

Spring Lake, NJ 07762

411 Tuttle Avenue

Appendix E - Lighting Audit - HW Mountz Elem School Page 1 of 5

Fixture Reference #

LocationAverage

Burn Hours


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $

Control Ref #


Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $


EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal


Simple Payback






tombstones3 45 2 0.09 144 0.10 154 $21 1


0 0.0% 0 $0 $180.00 $90.00 $270.00 $30.00 11.32 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

6 Rm 212A 16003-Lamp T8 Electronic



tombstones3 45 4 0.18 288 0.19 307 $42 1


0 0.0% 0 $0 $360.00 $180.00 $540.00 $60.00 11.32 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

6 Rm 212 16003-Lamp T8 Electronic



tombstones3 45 4 0.18 288 0.19 307 $42 1


0 0.0% 0 $0 $360.00 $180.00 $540.00 $60.00 11.32 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

21 Faculty Room 22002-Lamp T8 Electronic



tombstones2 30 1 0.03 66 0.03 70 $10 1


0 0.0% 0 $0 $60.00 $45.00 $105.00 $10.00 9.78 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

4 Room 205 Art 16002-Lamp T8 Electronic



tombstones


Controls0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,080.00 $810.00 $1,890.00 $180.00 13.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

2 Boys Rest Rm 22002-Lamp F17 T8 Electronic

2x2 Recessed Prismatic2 33 2 0.07 145 Re-Lamp/Reflector

Seesmart LED 2' Tube 9W 4Kwith semi Specular Reflector Kitbypass ballast and provide new

tombstones


2 Girls Rest Rm 22002-Lamp F17 T8 Electronic



tombstones


18 Janito's Closet 4001-Lamp T8 Electronic

4' Wall Mounted Prismatic1 32 1 0.03 13 Re-Lamp



13 Technology Office 22004-Lamp T8 Electronic



tombstones

3 45 4 0.18 396 0.28 607 $84 5Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt.

1 20.0% 79 $11 $360.00 $180.00 $540.00 $60.00 5.73 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 $35.00 19.67

6 Room 204 Conf Rm 22003-Lamp T8 Electronic



tombstones3 45 4 0.18 396 0.19 422 $58 5

Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor -

Remote Mnt.1 20.0% 79 $11 $360.00 $180.00 $540.00 $60.00 8.23 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 22.87

13 Room 203 16004-Lamp T8 Electronic



tombstones

3 45 12 0.54 864 0.83 1,325 $183 1Existing Occupancy

Controls0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,080.00 $540.00 $1,620.00 $180.00 7.88 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

14 Room 203 Storage 400 Incandescent (60W) 1 60 1 0.06 24 Replace Philips LED A19 10.5W 1 10.5 1 0.01 4 0.05 20 $3 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $13.00 $0.00 $13.00 $10.00 1.10 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

13 BA Office 22004-Lamp T8 Electronic



tombstones


Controls0 0.0% 0 $0 $360.00 $180.00 $540.00 $60.00 5.73 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

66 Cafeteria/Auditorium 22003-Lamp T5 Electronic

4' Pendant Direct/Indirect3 80 32 2.56 5,632 Existing to Remain No Change 3 80 0 2.56 5,632 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

2 Stage 22002-Lamp F17 T8 Electronic



tombstones


65 Closet 400 1-Lamp CFL (18W) 1 18 1 0.02 7 Existing to Remain No Change 1 18 0 0.02 7 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

13 BOE Office #2 22004-Lamp T8 Electronic



tombstones

3 45 4 0.18 396 0.28 607 $84 5Dual Technology


1 20.0% 79 $11 $360.00 $180.00 $540.00 $60.00 5.73 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 22.87

67 Rest Room 22001-Lamp T12 Magnetic

2-Foot Wall-Mounted Prismatic1 24 1 0.02 53 Replace



30 Classroom 202 16002-Lamp T8 Electronic 1x4 Pendant Prismatic




Controls0 0.0% 0 $0 $960.00 $720.00 $1,680.00 $160.00 13.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

14 Storage 400 Incandescent (60W) 1 60 1 0.06 24 Replace Philips LED A19 10.5W 1 10.5 1 0.01 4 0.05 20 $3 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $13.00 $0.00 $13.00 $10.00 1.10 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

30 Classroom 201 16002-Lamp T8 Electronic 1x4 Pendant Prismatic




Controls0 0.0% 0 $0 $960.00 $720.00 $1,680.00 $160.00 13.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

65 Storage 400 1-Lamp CFL (18W) 1 18 1 0.02 7 Existing to Remain No Change 1 18 0 0.02 7 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -


2x4 Ceiling Mounted Prismatic4 114 4 0.46 1,003 Re-Lamp / De-Lamp



2 Corridor 22002-Lamp F17 T8 Electronic



tombstones


11 Corridor 22002-Lamp FBO31 T8 U


Seesmart LED U-Tube 18W 4K with semi Specular Reflector Kitbypass ballast and provide new

tombstones



Fixture Reference #

LocationAverage

Burn Hours


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $

Control Ref #


Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $


EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal


Simple Payback






tombstones


4 Classroom 206 16002-Lamp T8 Electronic



tombstones


Controls0 0.0% 0 $0 $900.00 $675.00 $1,575.00 $150.00 13.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -




tombstones3 45 15 0.68 1,080 0.72 1,152 $159 1


0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,350.00 $675.00 $2,025.00 $225.00 11.32 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -




tombstones


Controls0 0.0% 0 $0 $900.00 $675.00 $1,575.00 $150.00 13.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -




tombstones


Controls0 0.0% 0 $0 $900.00 $675.00 $1,575.00 $150.00 13.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -




tombstones


Controls0 0.0% 0 $0 $900.00 $675.00 $1,575.00 $150.00 13.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

4 Room 211 Music 16002-Lamp T8 Electronic



tombstones

2 30 24 0.72 1,152 0.77 1,229 $170 1Existing Occupancy

Controls0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,440.00 $1,080.00 $2,520.00 $240.00 13.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

4 Practice Rooms (2) 16002-Lamp T8 Electronic



tombstones


2 Stairwell to Gym 22002-Lamp F17 T8 Electronic



tombstones





tombstones


Controls0 0.0% 0 $0 $720.00 $540.00 $1,260.00 $120.00 13.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

21 Girls Locker Room 22002-Lamp T8 Electronic



tombstones2 30 13 0.39 858 0.42 915 $126 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $780.00 $585.00 $1,365.00 $130.00 9.78 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

35 Storage 4001-Lamp T8 Electronic

4' Ceiling Mounted Prsimatic1 32 2 0.06 26 Re-Lamp







68 Restroom 22002-Lamp T8 Electronic

2-Foot Wall-Mount Prismatic2 33 1 0.03 73 Replace



69 Showers 22002-Lamp T8 Electronic

1x4 Ceiling Mounted Vapor Tight

2 62 3 0.19 409 ReplaceMaxLite LSV2XT8 Vapor Tight

LED Fixture2 44 3 0.13 290 0.05 119 $16 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $270.00 $270.00 $540.00 $30.00 31.11 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

70 GYM 22004-Lamp T5 HO Electronic

2x4 Pendant Mounted w/Cage4 236 30 7.08 15,576 Existing to Remain No Change 4 236 0 7.08 15,576 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

21 GYM 22002-Lamp T8 Electronic





2x4 Ceiling Mount Prismatic2 62 2 0.12 50 Re-Lamp / Reflector


tombstones



2x4 Ceiling Mount Prismatic2 62 1 0.06 25 Re-Lamp / Reflector


tombstones





tombstones


Controls0 0.0% 0 $0 $720.00 $540.00 $1,260.00 $120.00 13.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -




tombstones


Controls0 0.0% 0 $0 $720.00 $540.00 $1,260.00 $120.00 13.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

2 Boys Rest Rm 22002-Lamp F17 T8 Electronic



tombstones


2 Girls Rest Rm 22002-Lamp F17 T8 Electronic



tombstones


21 CSA Office 22002-Lamp T8 Electronic



tombstones2 30 2 0.06 132 0.06 141 $19 1


0 0.0% 0 $0 $120.00 $90.00 $210.00 $20.00 9.78 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

13 General Offices 22004-Lamp T8 Electronic



tombstones


Controls0 0.0% 0 $0 $990.00 $495.00 $1,485.00 $165.00 5.73 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -


Fixture Reference #

LocationAverage

Burn Hours


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $

Control Ref #


Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $


EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal


Simple Payback



72 Faculty Restroom #1 22001-Lamp F17 T8 Electronic2' Wall Mounted Prismatic

1 22 1 0.02 48 Re-Lamp Seesmart LED 2' Tube 9W 4Kbypass ballast and provide new


72 Faculty Restroom #2 22001-Lamp F17 T8 Electronic2' Wall Mounted Prismatic




2x4 Ceiling Mounted Prismatic4 114 2 0.23 502 Re-Lamp / De-Lamp


tombstones3 45 2 0.09 198 0.14 304 $42 1


0 0.0% 0 $0 $180.00 $90.00 $270.00 $30.00 5.73 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -




tombstones


Controls0 0.0% 0 $0 $540.00 $270.00 $810.00 $90.00 5.73 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

13 Nurse's Office 22004-Lamp T8 Electronic



tombstones


Controls0 0.0% 0 $0 $540.00 $270.00 $810.00 $90.00 5.73 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

72 Rest Room 22001-Lamp F17 T8 Electronic2' Wall Mounted Prismatic



21 Closet 4002-Lamp T8 Electronic




21 Faculty Break Room 22002-Lamp T8 Electronic



tombstones2 30 2 0.06 132 0.06 141 $19 5

Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor -

Remote Mnt.1 20.0% 26 $4 $120.00 $90.00 $210.00 $20.00 9.78 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 68.62

21 Boys Locker Room 22002-Lamp T8 Electronic




69 Boys Locker Room 22002-Lamp T8 Electronic

1x4 Ceiling Mounted Vapor Tight

2 62 3 0.19 409 ReplaceMaxLite LSV2XT8 Vapor Tight

LED Fixture2 44 3 0.13 290 0.05 119 $16 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $270.00 $270.00 $540.00 $30.00 31.11 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

21 Boys Room 22002-Lamp T8 Electronic




35 Room 100 22001-Lamp T8 Electronic

4' Ceiling Mounted Prsimatic1 32 2 0.06 141 Re-Lamp


tombstones1 15 2 0.03 66 0.03 75 $10 1


0 0.0% 0 $0 $60.00 $90.00 $150.00 $10.00 13.56 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

21 Janitor's Closet 4002-Lamp T8 Electronic




2 Hallway 22002-Lamp F17 T8 Electronic



tombstones


11 Hallway 22002-Lamp FBO31 T8 U



tombstones


13 Hallway 22004-Lamp T8 Electronic



tombstones


6 SGI Classroom 106 16003-Lamp T8 Electronic



tombstones3 45 4 0.18 288 0.19 307 $42 1


0 0.0% 0 $0 $360.00 $180.00 $540.00 $60.00 11.32 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

4 Hallway at 108/107 22002-Lamp T8 Electronic



tombstones





tombstones3 45 15 0.68 1,080 0.72 1,152 $159 1


0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,350.00 $675.00 $2,025.00 $225.00 11.32 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

73 Toilet 22003-Lamp T8 Electronic







tombstones3 45 16 0.72 1,872 0.77 1,997 $276 1


0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,440.00 $720.00 $2,160.00 $240.00 6.97 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

73 Toilet 22003-Lamp T8 Electronic




21 Mens Faculty Restroom 22002-Lamp T8 Electronic




6 SGI Room 100 16003-Lamp T8 Electronic



tombstones3 45 8 0.36 576 0.38 614 $85 1


0 0.0% 0 $0 $720.00 $360.00 $1,080.00 $120.00 11.32 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

4Room 102 Meeting

Room2200

2-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Recessed Prismatic

2 62 14 0.87 1,910 Re-Lamp / Reflector


tombstones

2 30 14 0.42 924 0.45 986 $136 5Dual Technology


1 20.0% 185 $26 $840.00 $630.00 $1,470.00 $140.00 9.78 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 9.80


Fixture Reference #

LocationAverage

Burn Hours


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr


FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings,

kW

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $

Control Ref #


Controls

Hour Reduction

%

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $


EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal


Simple Payback



72 Toilet 22001-Lamp F17 T8 Electronic2' Wall Mounted Prismatic



4 Kitchenette 22002-Lamp T8 Electronic



tombstones

2 30 7 0.21 462 0.22 493 $68 5Dual Technology


1 20.0% 92 $13 $420.00 $315.00 $735.00 $70.00 9.78 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 $35.00 16.86

2 Media Center 20002-Lamp F17 T8 Electronic



tombstones


Controls0 0.0% 0 $0 $40.00 $45.00 $85.00 $10.00 18.12 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

13 Media Center 20004-Lamp T8 Electronic



tombstones


Controls0 0.0% 0 $0 $2,160.00 $1,080.00 $3,240.00 $360.00 6.30 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

11 Media Center 20002-Lamp FBO31 T8 U



tombstones


Controls0 0.0% 0 $0 $210.00 $135.00 $345.00 $30.00 14.63 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

21 Closet 4002-Lamp T8 Electronic




21 Elevator Machine Room 4002-Lamp T8 Electronic




4 Library Office 22002-Lamp T8 Electronic



tombstones


Controls0 0.0% 0 $0 $360.00 $270.00 $630.00 $60.00 9.78 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

4 Library Office 22002-Lamp T8 Electronic



tombstones


Controls0 0.0% 0 $0 $240.00 $180.00 $420.00 $40.00 9.78 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

13 Lounge 22004-Lamp T8 Electronic



tombstones


Controls0 0.0% 0 $0 $540.00 $270.00 $810.00 $90.00 5.73 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

74 Room 101A 22004-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Pendant-Mounted

Prismatic4 114 5 0.57 1,254 Re-Lamp / De-Lamp / Reflector


tombstones


Controls0 0.0% 0 $0 $450.00 $300.00 $750.00 $75.00 6.44 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -




tombstones


21 Girls Rest Room 22002-Lamp T8 Electronic




4 Hallway 22002-Lamp T8 Electronic



tombstones


74 Boiler Room 4004-Lamp T8 Electronic 2x4 Pendant-Mounted

Prismatic4 114 3 0.34 137 Re-Lamp / De-Lamp / Reflector


tombstones


65 Pump Room 400 1-Lamp CFL (18W) 1 18 1 0.02 7 Existing to Remain No Change 1 18 0 0.02 7 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

21 Stairs #4 22002-Lamp T8 Electronic




21 Stair #3 8002-Lamp T8 Electronic




13 Old Eatry 6004-Lamp T8 Electronic

2x4 Recessed Prismatic4 114 2 0.23 137 Re-Lamp / De-Lamp / Reflector


tombstones


45 Front Entrance 3000 CFL (26W) 1 26 3 0.08 234 Existing to Remain No Change 1 26 0 0.08 234 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

62 Wall-Packs 3000 Metal Halide (70W) Wall Pack 1 86 9 0.77 2,322 Replace RAB Exterior 18W LED Wall Pack 1 18 9 0.16 486 0.61 1,836 $253 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $1,701.00 $810.00 $2,511.00 $900.00 6.36 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

65 Spot Light Fixtures 3000 1-Lamp CFL (18W) 1 18 3 0.05 162 Existing to Remain No Change 1 18 0 0.05 162 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

65 Wall Lights 3000 1-Lamp CFL (18W) 1 18 3 0.05 162 Existing to Remain No Change 1 18 0 0.05 162 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

TOTAL 782 61.5 113,916 705 33.9 64,207 27.7 49,709 $6,860 6 1 541 $75 $49,382 $32,505 $81,887 $8,955 10.63 $1,200 $300 $1,500 $70.00 19.15




APPENDIX F

Appendix FPage 1 of 5

Location Description

Area (Sq FT) Panel Qty

Panel Sq Ft

Panel Total Sq

FtTotal KWDC

Total Annual kWh

Total KWAC

Panel Weight

(41.9 lbs) W/SQFT

H.W. Mountz 14800SHARP

ND-240QCJ337 17.5 5,911 80.88 100,029 73.5 14,120 13.68

= Proposed PV Roof Layout = Proposed PV Parking Layout

Notes:

1. Estimated kWH based on the National Renewable Energy Laboratory PVWatts Version 1 Calculator Program.


Project Name: LGEA Solar PV Project - H.W. Mountz

Location: Spring Lake, NJDescription: Photovoltaic System 100% Financing - 15 year

Simple Payback Analysis

Total Construction Cost $364,205Annual kWh Production 100,029

Annual Energy Cost Reduction $13,804Average Annual SREC Revenue $15,155

Simple Payback: Years

Life Cycle Cost AnalysisAnalysis Period (years): 15 Financing %: 100%

Discount Rate: 3% Maintenance Escalation Rate: 3.0%Average Energy Cost ($/kWh) $0.138 Energy Cost Escalation Rate: 3.0%

Financing Rate: 6.00% Average SREC Value ($/kWh) $0.152Period Additional Energy kWh Energy Cost Additional SREC Interest Loan Net Cash Cumulative

Cash Outlay Production Savings Maint Costs Revenue Expense Principal Flow Cash Flow0 $0 0 0 0 $0 0 0 0 01 $0 100,029 $13,804 $0 $25,007 $21,432 $15,448 $1,931 $1,9312 $0 99,529 $14,218 $0 $24,882 $20,479 $16,401 $2,220 $4,1513 $0 99,032 $14,645 $0 $24,758 $19,468 $17,413 $2,522 $6,6734 $0 98,537 $15,084 $0 $19,707 $18,394 $18,487 ($2,089) $4,5845 $0 98,044 $15,537 $1,010 $19,609 $17,253 $19,627 ($2,745) $1,8396 $0 97,554 $16,003 $1,005 $19,511 $16,043 $20,838 ($2,372) ($533)7 $0 97,066 $16,483 $1,000 $14,560 $14,758 $22,123 ($6,838) ($7,370)8 $0 96,581 $16,977 $995 $14,487 $13,393 $23,487 ($6,411) ($13,781)9 $0 96,098 $17,487 $990 $14,415 $11,945 $24,936 ($5,969) ($19,750)

10 $0 95,617 $18,011 $985 $9,562 $10,407 $26,474 ($10,292) ($30,043)11 $0 95,139 $18,552 $980 $9,514 $8,774 $28,107 ($9,795) ($39,838)12 $0 94,663 $19,108 $975 $9,466 $7,040 $29,840 ($9,281) ($49,119)13 $0 94,190 $19,681 $970 $4,710 $5,200 $31,681 ($13,460) ($62,579)14 $0 93,719 $20,272 $965 $4,686 $3,246 $33,635 ($12,888) ($75,467)15 $0 93,250 $20,880 $960 $4,663 $1,171 $35,709 ($12,299) ($87,765)

Totals: 1,449,047 $256,741 $10,835 $219,536 $189,002 $364,205 ($87,765) ($367,065)Net Present Value (NPV)

Photovoltaic System 100% Financing - 15 year

12.58

($58,383)


PVWatts: Monthly PV Performance Data Rooftop Array - 1Requested Location: 411 Tuttle Avenue, Spring Lake, NJLocation: NEW YORK CITY, NYLat (deg N): 40.78Long (deg W): 73.97Elev (m): 57DC System Size (kW): 5.52Module Type: StandardArray Type: Fixed (roof mount)Array Tilt (deg): 26Array Azimuth (deg): 270System Losses: 14Invert Efficiency: 96DC to AC Size Ratio: 1.1Average Cost of Electricity 0.14Initial Cost No initial cost definedCost of Electricity Generatenot determined

MonthAC System

Output(kWh)

Solar Radiation

(kWh/m^2/day)

Plane of Array Irradiance (W/m^2)

DC array Output (kWh) Value ($)

1 258 1.77 54.84 274 35.612 353 2.69 75.19 372 48.723 519 3.64 112.71 544 71.564 622 4.64 139.26 652 85.835 711 5.26 163.11 744 98.066 756 5.97 179.11 792 104.397 742 5.74 178.09 776 102.388 657 5.02 155.57 688 90.649 540 4.20 126.05 566 74.51

10 422 3.08 95.58 443 58.1911 244 1.80 53.90 260 33.7312 229 1.61 49.86 244 31.57

Total 6,052 45.42 1383.27 6,353 835.19



MonthAC System

Output(kWh)

Solar Radiation

(kWh/m^2/day)



1 147 2.80 86.81 154 20.232 177 3.83 107.12 185 24.443 221 4.47 138.55 232 30.554 249 5.38 161.31 261 34.415 264 5.64 174.94 277 36.476 274 6.24 187.15 287 37.807 270 6.04 187.33 283 37.278 259 5.72 177.46 271 35.749 224 5.03 150.94 235 30.94

10 201 4.21 130.55 211 27.7711 128 2.65 79.55 135 17.7112 128 2.51 77.88 135 17.72

Total 2,544 54.53 1659.58 2,663 351.05



MonthAC System

Output(kWh)

Solar Radiation

(kWh/m^2/day)



1 4,455 2.26 70.06 4,693 614.812 5,772 3.27 91.68 6,051 796.503 7,805 4.11 127.46 8,170 1,077.034 9,276 5.21 156.26 9,706 1,280.085 10,263 5.72 177.22 10,734 1,416.236 10,776 6.40 192.10 11,269 1,487.147 10,564 6.17 191.21 11,046 1,457.828 9,775 5.63 174.50 10,218 1,348.939 8,049 4.71 141.26 8,425 1,110.83

10 6,714 3.67 113.89 7,036 926.5711 4,096 2.23 66.93 4,322 565.2812 3,888 2.02 62.60 4,108 536.60

Total 91,433 51.40 1565.17 95,778 12617.82

b : c e g - amazon simple storage service-+112415... · gym de-stratification fans $1,264 $14,000...

Documents