auv'yi,^j?a l - unt digital library/67531/metadc130766/m2/1/high_re… · edwin a. ingel in...
TRANSCRIPT
PJtQMICTIGSi TECHNIQUES OF «fW HEW SHAGICR&FT"
AS UTILIZED BY EUGENE O'NEILL
APPROVED:
Major Protestor
Minor Professor
AUv'yi,^j?A L / Bireeto|K^£ the Department o£ Speech aridDrama
DeeS' of:' the' Graduate ' School
PRODUCTION TECHNIQUES OF NSW
AT IITB.I&© BY WSMM& Q'NEILi,
THESIS
Presented to tim Graduate Cootie*! of the
Korth Teatas State University in Partiel
Fulfillment of th© Re<pira©©»fc#
For tlm Degree of
MASTER OF JkWm
By
John W, Wilton, Jr., B«A,
Donton, Toxst
August, 1966
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter Page
i, xmnoDocxm . i
thm mm stagecra£t In America
« * w s&k ytfc dm ajjin iMiiitt i* littifc iiHt m it' 1*1 mmm ^ ******
II# O'llKXU* AMD EXPRESSIONISM......•••••••••....... 32
Accent as vi»ual kacfegrmisut S«fc d«»lgn Sound •fleets Costow
XII* S Y M M M M AMD OTHER STXUBB . 59
Aefcor# ft* visual background 8«t diiiffi Souad «!c«at» Costume
IV. OOKCUJBI0H 7f
BOLXOGlAfH* . . 95
emrrEt i
wmmaim TECHNIQUES of **xm M W smeicaAfT"
AS UTILISED BY MIGME Q'WSEJL
Introduction
Kugene O'Neill, a playwright of nany universally recog-
nlsed tecoavl iilmmti , has been credited with being the American
playwright who isade a significant adaptation of Attic tragedy
for the contemporary stage* Among his credits also is the title
of escperimentar. He is counted among those dramatists and men
of the theatre who introduced to the American stage the "new
stagecraft", a tern applied to this newest aspects of production
in the European theatres at the torn of the century* His promi-
nent position among America's forenost literary figures has
c&med mch consideration of his taints as a writer# His
knowledge of the theatre, however, goes beyond playwxriting*
Sugene O'Keill made several experiments in his plays nhich show
influence of the a w stagecraft, these experiments were not
limited to plot development, but were expressed by hia in the
suggestions he made for the productions of his plays* These
plays i » of the expressionistic and eyesfoolic styles.
They call for certain innovations which lispose particular
technical problems characteristic of the rmw stagecraft.
Therefore* an milyili of O'Neill's pltyt pertaining to the
technical problems involved mwld provide Insight into most
of the technique® connected with the wm stagecraft.
At this point lot us look further at the new stagecraft
and what it encompasses. By the early 1900'• David Belaeoo
had successfully established realism aa the losnosc artistic
presentation in the Aioeriean theatre, With such notenorthy
productions u t M d w Batt»rfl» (1900), and £&L s£ £iS.
Golden Hast (1905) , Belasco established the style of pre-
sentation which mm believable when compared with nature. The
style « M essentially naturalistic in concept, hut soon became
known m ^alaeeoimi11 since it became specifically American.
(The plays he produced wm primarily by American authors.)
ftealiam and naturalism mm not new forms of presentation.
Andre Antoine, Etalle Zola, Konetantin Stanislavsky and other
builders of realism Mid naturalism had established these form®
of presentation In European theatres some ten to fifteen years
prior to Beiaseoism. Realism deals with believable characters
In believable circumstances familiar to everyone, tealIsm
requires the minimum of dramatic conventions* Life is
represented in as m m y 'ways as fist stage will pewit#* On
the other hand, naturalism singles mt some deterministic
force at work in the live® of the characters, environmental
or psychological • 'Bet subject usually deals vith law life
In a low life situation* Whereas realism trie* to make stag®
conventions seeo life Ilk®,. naturalism brings the object
Cor even the parson]! , frora life outside the theatre to
tehe stage.2 la the cam® m y Balasco sought to bring life
as it really wis to tim stage, %ritti natursa b@ing mirrored in
acting and all tha visual aspects of production»3
Even though it w s d Belascoisii m a destined to reign
forever on tha Aaarican stags» it soon began to fade as the
primary mode of dramatic presentation, A mixture o£ many
elements,' experimentally brought together, fonmilated a
system o£ presentation which Hordacai Corelik comprehensively
calls '*fh© M m Stagecraft#" As naturaliso and realism ware-a
rebellion against romanticism, so the new stagecraft was a
rebellion against naturalism. Writers at the time the new
^Charles Edward Aughtry, Landmarks in Modem Drama* Prom Xfasen to lonesco (Boston, 1963), p. 3*
^Ibid.-
jWrdecai Corelik, New latjaig, iSJL 9M. (Hew York, 1962), pp. 162*163 and 174,
stagecraft w i evolving found It difficult to mm® the new
mommmZ, The confusion in mm* gives noes© Idea of the
diversity of elements within the new form. Symbolism,
expressionism, aeo*ramanticis»» theatricallam, all were
distinct currents within the ooveiaent, Ganeraily, the
tmm9 mm stagecraft, refer* to a systsn of production which
regarded the stage as * stage, recognised tilt presence of the
eudleaca, end deelt with the "inner feelings" of life rsther
than life itself.
4s mt have noted, the precepts of the a w stagecraft
imm fostered in Europe. imtnmit theatre men, including
Max Rainhftrdt and Edward Gordon Craig, tosplred directors,
producers, and designers in America to move from the "old"
and ovar-msed naturalism, illauited for a presentational
effect, and experiment with the "new" forms of production*
Perhaps the most noeaworth achievement of the new it age*
craft movement was that it brought about a new conception
of the complete unity of all the aspects involved in dramatic
production. Sheldon Cheney, pioneer in the new movement, has
expressed the idea clearly:
The art of the theatre exists not in the text alone or in the acting, or in the stage decoration,
4Xbld.. p. 174.
but In the production as a whole, with pity, acting and setting bound togetter to afford
one harmonious appeal.
The aead for refooa was felt by numerous playwrights, edu-
cators, and director*. First reform* were manifest In a
turn, to stark naturalism due to work by such European theatre
figures as Xbsen and Antoine. Later naturalism, as we have
mentioned, was replaced by the efforts of such sen as
Mayerhold, Apple, and fuchs, as wall as Balnhardt and Craig.
The combined work of these men helped to foxm the method of
Stage production known in this country as the new stagecraft*
Revolution began with the attempt to fit a method of
presentation to the demands of the ecrlpt. Use of the various
styles within the new stagecraft entailed not only particular
methods of acting and direction, but also particular methods
of visual presentation* The "new atage•craftsmen" constructed
their work on two fundamental principlest that the stage
setting wist be a definite and integral part of the production.
In harmony with the atmosphere of the play viewed as a whole;
and that the setting must not be distracting but should lend
Ssheldon Cheney, gfg jfffVffitfnfr j& S M <®ew *<«*» 1914), p. 121.
itself to the action of the play. The fulfillment of these
principles been® the basic goal la the n@w stagecraft
Two of th© Mint outs tanking contributor* to the devel-
opment of the mm stagecraft in Europe were the two mm
previously mentioned, Hue Reinhardt and Edward Gordon Craig.
Edwin A. Ingel In liia book, The Haunted Heroes of Eugene
Q*Helll. assures us tha 0*tielll mis influenced by tha work
of thas# nan. Max Reinhardt was an innovator In tha European
theatre» His naw Idaas astonished many and caused a furor
within tha realm of both European and American drama.* He
was among the first to appeal to tha masses with thought
content as nail as spectacle. Bypassing unfavorable opinion,
lainhardt achieved an Intimate contact batman his actors and
tha audience» based cloaaly cm presen tatlonal ism as found in
tha classical Greek theatre, Ha replaced the usual ultra-
realistic scenery with architectural structures, using tha
space stag© as a means to asaphaslse the actor. Ha brought
th® actor as near to the audience as was possible in order to
include the spectators in the action. Reinhardt gave new
individuality to musty masterpieces and through tha careful
*lbid.» p. 123.
plwmisxg q£ their scenic pictures he m i able to asphasiz*
their stes sagas. One of hi# most outstanding productions wis
Tiie Miraela. which be first pvmmtmd in Berlin and eventually
brought to H«v fork. the MiaicU. for which ft^inhardt con-
murtiad an entire tiieatire into amediaval cathedral became the
outstanding example of the new movement in lurope, and <314
ouch to inspire dramatiata to the United States,7 Lazarus
Laughed shows an apparent influence of Jh^ Miracle* Me tmy
safely assume that 0 'Heill was influenced by Eeinhardt in
this respect because the European experimenter was a popular
subject in Anerican theatre circlaa of whieh O'Haill was a part*
Bngal alao points out that 0 *Heill of tan discussed tha
theories of Idw&rd Gordon Craig with his elose associates,
Robert iSdraond Jones and Keimeth Haegowaa*** Craig began to
gain world-wide attantion when hi published hia idaaa of tha
w m theatre movement in ftnglish. Craig promulgated such idea®
as using scenery which moved during tha flow of tha production
and having aatora who would be always subsarvient to the demands
7Huntley Carter, Theatre of Has Rainhardt (Haw York, 1914) pp. 117-264 passim.
%#win A. Ingei, g|& Bywiiai4 Heroes of Euaene 0'Kail! (Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1953) p. 64.
a
of the dime tor, Craig, tfxx* •m m a Identify with the
symbolist taovswwnt, held that every stage production oust
be entirely controlled by a single mind* The syabollsts
used the staga to show how envlroonent Is set apart from
the body* This Is achieved by bringing to the fore only a
significant detail of the environment, using this detail
as a symbol for the whole.9
One of Craig's iiore interesting suggestions was that
tha live actor alght be replaced by a "super-aarlooacte"
nho could be counted m not to distort* with his personality
the visual harmony casated by the director*10 This idea
coincides with the symbolist Idea chat a stag® production
In every aspect must be thm work of mm. «lndf a "teas tar
mixtd*" H@ explained s
And X an distinctly under the taprossloa that It Is the Actor iiho la going to bring thie treat (the fuppet) to tht world* The Actor Is not sophlstlcatad-not ia®chanlcal —and, sick beyond
9Corellk, fllfrfrlffff,. I m 2M» V* W *
10Vera Howry Roberta. On Stage (Hew York, 1962), p* 430*
words of the stickiness of the Cinema, he will overhaul the whole craft and give us what we want to see.^
Clearly Craig did not want dummies on the stage, but used
this suggestion to express his wish that the actor be domi-
nated, not the one who dominates.
O'Neill calls for actors in Seen® Five of The Hairy Ape
who resemble marionettes in their movement and somewhat resemble
them in their appearance* Me may assume that O'Neill had
studied Craig's use of the word "marionette," But O'Neill's
suggestion was for a theatrical style of acting, not a plea for
a subservient actor. Craig's influence cannot be safely
suggested by this slim, and probably accidental, connection.
Ve can, however, pinpoint the English theorist's influence
in other aspects of O'Neill's work. For example, the
engulfing, progressively moving, jungle in The Emperor Jones
calls to mind Craig's work with scenery that moved during
the flow of the production. The symbolic mask in The Great
God Brown adheres to the symbolist idea that one detail might
act as a symbol for the whole production. (Both of these
examples will be discussed in detail in the following chapters.)
Realising that Craig's theories found a worthy following in the
• Edward Gordon Craig, Puppets and Poets (London, 1921), pp. 18-19.
10
United States, it Is safe to assume that O'Neill, so much
a part of the new American theatre, did not escape the
English idealist's influence.
To this point we haw seen the philosophy surrounding
the concept of the new stagecraft. Let us now turn to a
concrete application of the new stagecraft as applied to
the work of Eugene O'Neill. With the latter thought in
mind, we spay best describe the new stagecraft as direct
staging. According to Mordecai Gorelik this entails;
A type of staging which is addressed to an alert and participating audience rather than to a passive and contemplative audience* It describes the psychology of most con-ventional staging, 2-2
It also "describes the psychology" of thought which infiltrated
the American stage. The arrival and acceptance of the new
production ideas was slow, and the vehicle unconventional,
but the ideas soon found expression on the American
stage, and especially in the plays of Eugene O'Neill.
Direct staging, which may also be called presentationalism,
is precisely what defines O'Neill's use of the new stage-
craft. Assigning one particular term to the style of the
12(jorelik, Hew Theatres For Old, p. 497.
11
plays of O'Neill, though expressionism Is a very predominant
one, would be an erroneous undertaking since the plays dis-
play many of the style® found within the bound# of the new
stagecraft, in addition to the many instances of naturalism.
The environment in which O'Neill experimented with the
aspects of the mew stagecraft defined his use of it. There-
for®, an extensive view of this environment and its own
origins will provide a better understanding of O'Neill's
experimentation. 0'Neill began his work as an experimenting
dramatist not on Broadway but in the little theatre movement,
particularly as a part of the Provincetown Playhouse, In
truth he was a significant part of the little theatre move-
ment and contemporary with such men as Sam Hume, director
of the Detroit Arts and Crafts Society, mid Maurice Browne,
director of the Chicago Uttle Theatre, The phrase "new
stagecraft" was closely related to the little theatre
movement. The former represented the leading characteristic
of the latter. The new stagecraft, which was essentially a
rebellion against the choking predominance of naturalism,
was the guiding principal of the little theatre Movement,
which began as a rebellion against the monopoly of theatre
production cm Broadway. The little theatres came to public
12
notice following World War I. K*inhardt,s production of
& p m m u and Craig's wrifelaga mti responsible for the
inspiration of MVM*1 mm later bee*# piroeaimmt
w o in America. This liat includes both $as A m mud
Maurice Browne. These tnsfi were interested in the naif and
experimental. The Mrm&my stag© was ©ve» then a coupler
•yitao, and no producer wished to invest money la m experi-
aeatal font of staging which rialsad unfavorable acceptance
by the critic* and the public. Aa a result, the designers
in the viaual arta, who bad become infatuated with the m m
movement in th© thisatra, turned to the mxz best tfotxtg«<*the
little theatres,*^
In practical use, the mm stagecraft manifests itself
In many way®. Its presentational ideas may be expressed to
the script, in the set design, in only one scene, or as the
controlling element of the entire production* Several
styles evolved which employed the presentational format aa
their basis. As has bean mentioned, these styles Include
many of the "isms" which followed naturalism, such styles aa
theatricalism, nm•romanticiesa, syabolism, or expressionism*
13Sheldon Cheney, The Art theatre (New York, 1932), p. 187.
13
and several others• These stylet served as guideposts for
such minor tributaries as Dadaisa, construetivisn, surrealist,
formalism, and several less accepted ones* For our purpose
we shall look at expressionism, the style most employed by
Ocelli. One of 0'Keill*e best examples of the use of ex-
pressionism Is |h® iaiinr Ape. In an interview held early
in his career, 0'Weill confided:
The uiiole play is expressionistic . The ooal shoaling in the furnace-room t for Instance, Stokers do not really shovel coat that m y . But it is done in the play in order to eon* tribute to the rhythm.«*Take the fo'c'sle scenes in The Hairy Ape, for instance. feople think X ma giving sxi exact picture of the reality* They don't understand that the vbole play is expresslcmistic.**
In close observation, one is able to see that O'Heill's
m m of expressionism departs wxaenhat fro© the conventional
definition of expressionists. As a »an of this theatre £r«a
his birth, 0 'Heill saw expressionism only as a swans of
theatrical presentation. To him, the use of it could be
expressed in terms of the theatre. He could not separate
it from use other than prescribed by the theatre.
l%ary B. Mullett, "The Extraordinary Story of lugene 0'Heill." Aaieriean mm&Um. XCXV (November, 1922), 34.
14
la order to formalize a definition «£ expressionism
m it n $ used by ©'Weill, let us txcalne the conventional
definitions* After the First World War, expressionism
became a primary form of production found on the German
stag#. What it aeant was puzxling even to fch@ Germans,
Today it i® still not completely clear. For tome It
represented m y tread which m* not in any way lite
naturalism. la M s book, Zk& Story Jgfe Thsatre. Glenn
Hughes explains expressionism as it ii« viewed at its
origin:
Expressionism in brief, is a nam for any method of theatrical production which is opfposed to representation for its own sake* In other words, whether the materials of production (actors, scenery, properties, It cetera} are real or artificial, recog-ni*ablei»itatian» of natural objects, or abstract symbols of mood and feelings, does not natter* They are expressIoniatic if fchsy are used to convey a significance other than that of mere representation.1*
These methods of theatrical production might include cubism,
formalism, post-impressionism, or many more. Indeed these
forms say be portrayed in the expressionistic production.
In reality, expressionism finds its roots in such painters
u ^ Glerm_Hughes, 4|i«„tory. g£ the A m m S ^ $ E &
\sMW xOUIt 3*925/ § ffr e 290 e
15
m Klee, 55rwt, Chirico, Chagall, G ross or the French
"primitive*." These artist* <mtiked midst the movement
later termed "surrealism," Surreal is®, in art* leaves
the things found in the natural world, and finis Its
subject* elsewhere# The method by wtiich it is expressed
is alwsys the saw-to picture specifically the most
radical aspects of visual imagination. Surrealism, to
achieve its purpose, depends upon its ability to shew
that the absurd is actual.16 As a part of the theatre,
expressionism retained a dependence on reality, as had
its forerunner, surrealism. In the theatre expressionism
found its basis in the distortion of reality, closely
related to a "dream world" quality. August Strindberg's
&B2S* SSQfifiL & n d Us. iatt flax »*» excellent examples
of this "dream" effect. One of the aims of expressionism
in the theatre w eh© attempt to leave the proscenium /
stage in favor of the stage platform. Ixptteaaionism, more
of a point of view than a style, often uses the symbol as
the Mans of presentation. Georg Kaiser, perhaps the chief
playwright using the theatrical ©xpr#»si<mistic medium,
i6John Ives Sewsll, 4 Bl$SEX 2* &ft£g£ft 4J& *ork, 1961), pp. 772-773.
16
«xanpli£ied the wnt of 1b bis flay# Gas Jt and
€n« IX« Kftls*r uaed such things as explosions, machines $
colors, and *blta cats to esspress such Idea* at social
injustice, capitalistic wpr®«aeys and the evils of
industrialism, this Is particularly significant since
the use of syabols Is n. prominent feature of the type
at axpresslonlsa found la several of 0'Heill's plays.
The styles of. expressionism, symbollaw, and naturalisra
s » v«ry often found concurrently in the plays of Eugene
0 *K#tXl, for cmqplft* in the . flppaaar.
Afea. d*Halll employs ffl^p»«steilstlc dlstcnrtlanj».js»§.,ar
«tre nceR®« # i i k others tend to be n*tei»llaeie»... ,AiU. „of.
thas® s©m#a_ « » interspersed with sfrahc su^ ...jgjKXMdMlttewiB-
ftaniiahea dffAaitt^ti of «^»ses«lmljra closely r f | # . ® § 4 , ..50..
fehs..seyl« um& hy 0 'Heill. Macgowon defined i t a® southing
aosg atfcmptjtaeaeape • realism;
It ruight u»e uacure or .mart, as the raedio® of '©^ressioii tnjr. it. subdues the..appearance of this .natural world, to the toner reality of His motion which i t wishes tomato clear to us.*' ' "
^mrnrnm mcgtrnmn. H a Theatre ff . ffflMOT! 0»®w *°«*» 1921), p, 254.
17
Sheldon Cheney, though tending to romanticize, explains
this "inner reality of the ©notion" as an expression of
the playwright*s emotion rather than the picturing of
that which stimulates it5 as an escape from what can only
be j&enu by the eye.
The distortion of reality and the "reality of the
emotion" are the keys to the type of expressionism employed
by O'Neill. Such distortion was used by O'Neill to achieve
the inner feeling he wished to portray. |ln The Emperor Jones,
the inner feelings of the Emperor are expressed by symbolic
figures which r#pr^#nt the Ssaperor's pas t I n All God's
Chilian Got Wings, the walls of a room slowly close in on
the characters in art expressionistic attempt to reveal the
engulfing situation. Distortion of reality and the picturing
of inner feelings are conventional in delinitioili of jgsp.X'.M*
sioniwa. Q 'Nelll's .dstgRyjaagft,.conventionalmethod®
stems froa..
theatrical best suited to express his ideas for these two
plays mentioned above.
^Sheldon Cheney, The Theatre (New York, 1952), p. 519.
18
In our search for a clearer understanding of 0'Nelll's
use of the new stagecraft let us investigate hi® early
association with the theatre. Eugene 0'Nelll began his
dramatic career as the new stagecraft was being introduced
to the American stage, but 0Weill's contact with the
theatre began at birth. As the son of James O'Neill, Eugene
spent most of his youth watching hi® father portray Kd&ond
Dante® in The Count of Monte Oristo. He took very little
interest in his father's career and only actively participated
once as assistant manager in a vaudeville adaptation of the
play. This period of O'Neill's life is in fact characterized
by a disinterest in his future. O'Neill at this time had no
set goals. In his early manhood O'Neill attempted to hold
several jobs* he was a seaman on a freighter to Buenos
Aires, a salesman for Westingbouse in South America, and a
clerk in a small wholesale distribution firm. After he be-
came ill with tuberculosis, O'Neill was sent to the Gaylord
Sanitorium, and it was there that he decided to write. After
his release from Gaylord, O'Neill was persuaded by Clayton
Hamilton, a close associate, to enroll in George Fierce
Baker's English 4? playwriting course at Harvard. Be-
cause Baker wished O'Neill to follow old tradition rather
io
tS%m. eaperSaaafc with imwrr Ideas?, tie <fait the course mad
Introduce to the ii senary group la tsar called the
Province!#*® Players , W
Thci&oup HnoKR as the Provincetown Play@x*s wis
orEpralsad at Province to*«zi» Haaaachuaatta, la 1915 and •
T>ycaw» the mummv retreat for many of ths Greenwich Village
artilfts and **rit*ra. The original group included ®wch
peoples o€ the arts and Vitetmtwre m Sci#«ri Gla&pell* M m ,
St* Vincent Mlllcy, George Cram Cook, and Alice Giretenbarg,
Tli® palmary purpose of the group was to provide a stage for
m m Asne^ioan rtraraatista, giving Sheea opportunity for
expertaaafcal •work without the narrow^ltwted control of tihm
connsercial theatre,. T.n 1916 & branch thaatra was established
in Hew fork ^which fuacgloaed as the experimental laboratory,
!fc was allied sitaply the Fravlncetcraa Playhouse• George Cram
Cook ties selected to be director* It «,§ characterised aa
a radical theatre, rebelling strongly against the caonaarcial
natural lata,
19Croawell Bourn» the a m s i & & i < * « * 1959), pp. 62-48 saeito,
23 Chawsey, The Art Theatre* p. 477.
20
A t Harvard Eugene O'Heill had written mvmml on®-act
plays. twit®* to mmt th® frovincetown group, h« brought
with hi® Bound |H£ fat SSS$H£ f o r t t e n t o
Georg© cram Cook rend it aloud to those present while O'Heill
rasaioad la another rooea. Everyone agreed that hi# work
shooed promise. With treiasndous enthusiasm, Gook began
making O^ill tha revolutionising forca of the company.
0 'Melll soon gained a position of praminmee and respect
to the Provineatown group. In 1922 the WUybmm m* closed
for the purpose of reorganisation. Many ol th® group left
involved in other activities* Baring the lutetia
O'Keill, Kenneth Mecgowan, and Sfifeert Edaond Jones began to
plan th® new theatre. 0»!eill felt that the Bohemian life
Q£ original group did not lend itself to the dlsciplina
necessary for a successful organisation • He offered the
directorship to Macgowan with th© idea that Mm$omn should
hew complete control* Refusing to accept ccwplete authority,
n&cgmma suggested instead that Ocelli and Jones join hta
to form a type of Htriuravirat©»" all with the powers of
director, the gentlemen called thair thaatre the Expertoental
Theetre. Even though officially the time of the theatre was
Hit Experimental theatre. Incorporated, th® public and a law
21
of the members retained t&m mum The Provincetown Playhouse.
From 1923 to 1924 Tlie Experimental Theatre presented sixteen
of 0'He ill's plays, In 1923 the group produced Emperor
Jones. All God's Chlllun got Minus, Clencairn. and fMPPPM^^ MflPRMMMW ,3iPPwiiP'PlPiPwi'P : —>r~—— — --• —
Desire Under The lima. ' la 1^24 the theatre produced a
revival of MSZaBS.*21
This new theatre» formed by the triumvirate, was tailored to give 0*80111 a free hand* O'Neill had clear and persistent ideas of how plays shooId look and sound on stage, However* as Edith J, R. Isaacs eyggested, "the coawereial theatre*® realities disturbed Mid confused him; they were ao seldom vhat he saw in his mind's eye," The new organisation was dedicated to make visible and articulate the images existing In the 'bind'a eye" of Sugeme O'Reill,2*
411 three ©en were extremely interested in the new theatre,
and muted the new stagecraft to be a part o£ it* 0 *Keill
had clear and definite ideas of how his plays should look
on Hie stage and wanted the freedom to experiment.23
Before going further let us look at the theatre in America
as it was when O'Neill began his career. The theatre at the
*lHelan Dtuteh, The Frovlncetown (Sew fork, 1962), pp. 99*101•
*^%dbert Black, "Robert Kdnwnd Jones," unpublished doctoral dissertation, department of Drama, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, 1956, pp. 131-152.
^^Ibid,. p. 152.
22
t a n o£ tha oantvxy cm of ttiA stock eo&paxiias» Tfa*
Btmsk cempmay mm a thoatr tcel trtmp- attached t© sows
par t icular theater®. Each member of tlms group undirtook
mmm apealal l ine of bustne»s<"<»tha leading man and woman,
the old sansi and wmm,* t f e mmpmmmmx&xy or guest i U r t e t c .
A pttK&Kitloxt uat Uni ted to a finr performances, t tan anotiier
iMaedlatiely took I t s p U a t , aad m b@§asi ®» tt&ln
of brief ^ O 'Nei l l ' s fetter w i a raembetr of
aueti a compsay. Tfe© «c@aairy, i f not hindlid in a slipshod
*ay, mm natmaaiietie mmk In the mmmr Bmlmmo followed.
Chiefly the raato object of suelt theatres mm m mmmmiMl
mm* f o r th i s reaiiott l i t e r a ry quality «m not of gvaat
Importance. Any play, so long as I t had audience appeal*
was worthy of th® stock conyaay'* ctfmsldevstisci» Uliat plays
tha*w wave of l i t e r a ry m r i t warn £ m p i « a and tin# author 's
m m sold out the houses not always aottog a b i l i t y . Whoa
»w«h actor® as Edwin Bootfc, and l a t e r i w i J i m s O'Veil l ,
gained sueeea* fo r tibMnaelves, audianeea etna to sua that ,
not necessarily tbs play.**
^^fhyl l is Hartnoll , ed i to r , JIm Oasford Companion jg^ the <X^sodi»# 1951)» pp. 771-7727
23wuiiff» Lym Ftiaips, twsatlafch Gmmiqi. Ihtmpe* {Wmt *rn% 1920) , p , a . ^n^ra-rcr -w-™ p r r -mr
23
Sven mi early m the middle nineteenth century, the
stock eaapanies, primarily located in New fork, Boston, and
Philadelphia (though doaens of cities of population 70,000
upmxd bad a resident stock ©ewpany up to the depression in
the thirties), ware being threatened by the establishment
of the long-run play* By 1880 the threat was strongly
apparent. Mow in M m fork the long-run play had become
an established and m accepted thing. But there yet
renataad the eannezelalia» that had plagued the stock
conpany* Producers were Interusted only In plays that
could pay for thatsselvea. there ««« no mm for anything
other than well-tried and well "accepted plays*
It IM® into a world of theatre such as this that
lugea© 0'Weill am® with the burning seal to ©xjmrisient
and work with mm ideas* It w this type of theatre that
the new stagecraft helped to repair*
Many of ©f»aili#» intentions as a playwright are explained
cpite clearly la hi* « words* It is not difficult to see
that he was disturbed by the product of the conimerci&l theatre.
In his explanation concerning the purpose* of The Experimental
theatre, 0'Kaill gives us an Idea about his feeling® con-
cerning the purpose of dramatic production;
24
Our plsyhmim is essentially a l«bor»tory for artistic experiment. Our alias mm special •.. »A play is written to be ex-pressed through the theatre, and only on Its aaarifcs la a theatre aim a final judgment be passed ©a It with justice* Wa daasnd this hearing,2®
EU owu intentions an an experimenting playwright ware
expressed by faint in a witten opinion of Broadway:
X xmnt people to leave my theatre actually quarreling about «liafc they have Tbaxv is nothing More tragic to me than
uxuoved tint pone out of our Broadt#ay theatres after tint play{*7
Wa can only suggest that 0 "Neil! intended to utilise the
opportunities given to him to put into practice his ideas
concerning the mm stagecraft.
As w® have Been, Eu;pna 0 'Neill was influenced by the
tiMis* Th© little theatre movement, European dramatic
innovations as discussed in American dxmm circles, Macgovmn
and Jones wre all a part of those ti»es. Those particular
Influences %foich prompted 0 'llalll to wit® and attempt the
"new" are difficult to uncover. Many influences can only
be assumed, others are indirectly revealed in O'Neill*s
26Deutch, The Province town « p« 109•
^Arthur and Barbara Galb, 0 *lleill (Henr fork, 1962), p. 477.
25
comments and those of his critics, while a select few
axe easily uncovered. He proved himself to be interested
in the newest aspects of literature when he reported in
an interview that in college he was more impressed fey Oscar
Wilde, Jack London, Joseph Conrad, and Renrik Ibsen than
William Shakespeare, He proved himself more interested in
the works of Guy de Maupassant, the French writer of short
stories who often dealt with inner feelings, than any other
writer. And he read everything by him,28 The Emperor
Joneswhich .expressionistically reveal® the inner feelings
of the tortured Emperor, and Strange Interlude, in which
asides expose the inner feelings of the characters, surely
indicate the influence of de Maupassant. These particular
literary influences are not always easily seen in O'Neill's
writings, but are significant in that they provided hia with
the desire for the new and the modern. One literary in-
fluence , however, may be seen in his plays. Many, in-
cluding the Provincetown Group, attest to the influence
of August Strindberg on O'Neill. Much later, or course,
28Bowen, The Curse of the Misbegotten, pp. 58 and 125.
26
on the occasion of hie ncmiteafcicm for the Nobel Prise,
O 'Neill admitted In his acceptance speech:
Of eourM, it will be no newt to you in Sweden, that my writ awe* tmch to the influence of Strindberg* That rune clearly through more than a few of ray plays and is plain for everyone to tee. *
it ia likely that we can accept 0'Hem's obeisance liter-
ally. Several instances in hia plays attest to its truth.
Clara Blackburn, in an article written in African Literature
entitled "Continental Influences on Eugene O'Meill's gapres-
sionistic Dramas/' points out several parallels between
the works of Strindberg and those of O'lfelll. Miss Blackburn
especially sites the many comparisons between Strindberg's
&s. s s s B Eisz *w» o ' i i « iu'» aeiia i n Q a bessb
flay. Indra, daughter of a god, descends to earth to
experience ehe trials of mankind. Likewise in the Hairv
Mildred , the daughter of a rich company president
descends into the hold of the ship to view life there.30
There are alao several parallels found in the dialogue of the
29Gelb, O'Neill, p. 614.
SOdara Blackburn, "Continental Influences on Eugene 0'Reill,a Sxpressionistic Dramas,** American Literature. XIII (May, 1941), 115-121.
27
two plays. The daughter of the god in The Dreao Pl&y visit®
tha working site of some cca.1 vorkers. S trindberg describes
the mmis In this Banner:
On the left, a big pile of coal and two vheelbarrovs....Two coalheavers, waked to tha «saist and black of body, face and hands from handling the coal, alt on the wheelbarrows. Their faces show despair and agony*-*1
In tha dascription of tha stotcahola aa Mildred saaa it in
Tha Hairy Apa 0'Neill suggests:
Tha stokahola. • .aaurky air laden with coal dust,.*A line of men stripped to the mist .. .One or two ara arranging tha coal behind them,. .Tha others can be dimly made out leaning on their shovels in relaxed attitudes of exhaustion... 3*
Again In The Dream Play, the First Coalheaver makes a pleat
What have we done? It vras our lot to be born o£ poor parents—and not too respectable at that. * • .We taay have been convicted a couple of tinea, too....
31 John Gaasner, Tfttjpwfr og, th*. P m m York, 1931)
p. 1129.
32sugene 0'Meill, Nine Plava. edited by Joseph Wood Krutch (Hew York, 1952), p. 43.
3 Ressner, Treasury of the Theatre, p. 1129.
(7
28
Long mates a siatilar plea in The Hairy Avmi
• • .And who's ter blame, I asks yer? Ve
ain't,. .We wia't; born this rotten nay...34
The Coalheaver also describee his situation by saying, '•This
is hell."35 Long echoe his description when he says, "This
is 'all. We livas in 'ell."^ It is seen by these examples,
though few and perhaps incidental, are too similar to be
attributed to coincidence. In final consideration, it is
not difficult to believe that 0'Belli was influenced by
the work of Strindberg since the Swedish dramatist was an
eaeperinenter who dealt with ©any of the ideas characteristic
of the siw stagecraft.
the enviroiKaent in which O'Neill worked, the dramatic
innovations in Europe, and certain literary innovations
provide the influences which were a part of the tines,
influences fro® which it would have been hard for O'Neill
to escape. These influences indirectly presented O'Neill
with an understanding of the new stagecraft or provided hi*
with guideposts to aid in the progression of his work.
%1leili, Mine Plays, p. 43.
^ iGassner, p. 1129.
^Q'tteill, p. 42.
29
There are other influences which might be called "direct"
influences, These influences are composed of the people
O'Neill taet and the situations of which he was a part.
To begin, we turn to Ocelli's homs life. As we have already
mentioned, O'Neill was introduced to the theatre at a very
early age. It is not surprising that Janes O'Neill was
prominent influence on his son, It can be soen from the
stage directions in his plays that O'Neill was acutely aware
of the technical problems involved in the actions of his plays.
O'Neill drew ground plans of settings for most of his plays,
usually when they were still in their planning stage. Along
with the scripts of Dynamo and Pesire Under the Sims, 0'Neill
furnished not only ground plans but detailed pictures of the
sets as he wished them to be in actual production. With his
long association with the theatre, O'Neill undoubtedly was
aware of the limitations of the stage of his day and this
led him to develop new ideas concerning visual p r e s e n t a t i o n . 3 7
0'Neill spent many evenings with the Provincetown group !
discussing the new innovations in the theatre, especially
those concerned with the European theatre. Much of their
time was devoted to discussion of the needs of American drama.
37Gelb, p. 568.
30
Ocelli** knowledge of the new stagecraft was supported
greatly by hi# association wlfcti Kenneth Macgowan and Robert
Kdmond Macgowan, emerging as an eminent critic,
was familiar with the theories of the new stagecraft at
the time of his work with O'Neill. In 1921 Macgowan**
The Theatre of Tomorrow was published, followed in 1922 by
Continental Stagecraft, inspired by his tour of European
theatres. Both books prove his thorough familiarity with
andInterest in the new stagecraft. Jones had collaborated
on the later volume, and, like Macgowan, had been excited
by the changes on tim European stage. The ttuma had
especially spent a great deal of tine discussing the ideas
of Craig, trying to understand what the Sngllsh theorist
was trying to say and how they might utilise his ideas.*9
Ocelli's knowledge of the premises of the new stagecraft
surely could have been obtained to this association, fhe
Experimentaltlhtatxe was determined to produce O'Neill's
plays as closely as possible to the way he pictured them
himself. The realisation of this ambition was aided by
^Ibid.
3§gngei, jjmfflwi fteaf si rnmrn. aZssMi.
31
Kaegowsn's critical help* and Jones'1 advice about t&ehaical
r«atters. ® Since Q*Kt ill's allianco vith these two men
was so strong, it is -not surprising that they should have
had a significait influence on hi®.
Eugene O'Neill's use of expressionism and symbolists is
found in all the parts of his., plays: not only in the dialogue
but also in what he calls for in scenery, costume, sound
effects, and makeup. O'Keill't, experimentation with
expressionism in its fullest definition in the theatre« And
some plays, preseat,an unusual combination of naturalism and
various forms of presentational technique* fti®, sections
following will investigate certain presentational plays
including those,which are expressionistic and those which
are a combination of expressionism, symbolism, and naturalism,
In particular, the investigation will' be "so "arranged as to
view the technical problems which result from the suggestions
0 *Naill makes in his plays.
^Black, "Eobert Edmond Jones", pp. 154-155,
FBDDUCTION TECHNIQUES OP "THE NEW STAGECRAFT"
AS UTILIZED BY EUGENE O'NEILL
CHAPTER II
Ofl!eill and Expressionism
From Charles Edward Aughtry we gals* the following definition of expressionism:
Key ideas connected with expressionism are subjectivity, distortion, and vehemence. This term applies to a style of play writing, of stage design and or pro* due tion<—even of acting, which is not airways psychologically realistic, but nay be declamatory in an "unnatural" way*•••The objective world is deformed in order to suggest an ultimate, inner reality. As a result, expressionist plays often have a nightmare quality about them, which in turn creates an intense, sometimes agressive effect.1
The _ "distortion" expressionism is the. total effect of the
stage production of several of O'Neill's plays. To illustrate
0*Neili,s employment of expressionism, we shall deal principally
*Aughtry, Landmarks in Modem Drama: From Ibsen to Ionasco. pp. 154-155.
32
33
with Uft fWWOT Jgaai «nd B»» BSl£X ABE. other pl*y», in
particular, Lgiaaiji Mmfihad and £rg£t M jfcE«» « •
intereperued throughout with. 41#t«d'~alauMtt*..i^icsh,,
distaste «i otherwise reaiistie, situaticm imd m«rit; out
attention. furth®.®ior@» %m ehali take alanantt
o£ stage production, speeAfiealiy.. «e«nary# sound ©££©ct$,
costume, and fch@ actors themselves f and show how
thay msm used by 0 'Nail]L,ta •m&taija-wa-MxpmmimMt&e
effect.
Between the years 1921 and 1924 0 *Heili wot© and pro*
ducsad ffaa Jtos»y^ andXhe Hairy..Am*. HithXha Mmmsm....
Jofi®8. Q'Hatll wt* ah In to perfect the .Wie. of .syi8ho.ii«»...a«d .
expressionism which opened the eyes o£ £|ta th@atr© public
audi helped to aatablich ®xpmmiomijm m m accepted £o»
ogproductioa, oa the wsrieaii stags, Tha Hairy Ape gaw
furthar evidence o£ the _ auasiie# • that could k w with • the
of. Q^gvUA *• jmni jp&.wgpiitflBlitic tachniquaf and they
•ufficiantly exemplify the techoical fueob&ana iAvalvad<-<lst--«a<
expreseionietic production*
34.
Before the ascendancy of the stew stagecraft, the part
played by the Actor in the production •was limited Co the
mare delivery of linss. The Baroque pariod, for «mplt,
was characterised by actor® who stood before highly ornata
teanaxry m d delivered lines with, a mtnimm of logical
expression and a ml iiiaiM of mcrmmmt, With the coming of
naturalism the actor gained importance because the lines
dalivarad mm an all-important factor of tha production.
In the naturalistic production tha t&lm of the actor,
important as it may have bean, was navartfaelass an* of only
presenting the lines to the audience, interpreting thara in a
natural manner for thm audience, and making tha nmemmry life-
like aovenents. Innovators in th© nm stagecraft amt..£be
actor as a ©ore versatile part of tha prasentationj for
exanpla,the actor could ba a planned . .part o£ .tha-visual.. back-
g r o u n d ^ Wefind in Tba jsaparor Jonas that .this is the primary
foz^jo£ easprass ion „ -
% t is interesting, to note that Robert EAmmd Jonas made a sat of designs for a projected production of Jig, Cencl. The pictures from this sat of designs «hich ha pit into his book Saiteii l2£ the Jones iisad tha actor to form the major part of his scenery. With a phenomenal uaa of light* ing the actors ara arranged to groups so that their armor and cos tunas praaant all the scanary that is nacassary. It is possible to spaculata that 0#Heill nay hava baan influancad by Jonas* technique.
35
As 'the Iteperor Jones moves tfoa gorestf Jto
eaeomtwi s#i»|ml..gr$w®«
la general# ' In {&* a*lglAaX-4P*B*M*£an^
tcmiFiayhotise, _ .wis*, Jl! .l»...
sil]taae.tl»..Jad. mms&tejt femed -i^-lMttkgxHUHii Jta^j&fMtf *
encounter with the killed
while.* JMNttas in ,tfe*,.12alted~fr ta«e*» • • As lie #«uefeles-<.lat0
fell® Jtinfl^ Joi*$* Imndm „. a clicking soundt ^•"' J
iMyiicslteS
grouud be^r^ liit-, piukiufe tl ys
4iM«Mnie«^-«o«saMat« of en syet$raBt,i$a.-»'"'
to Some fear* Jmm encounter® the vision of & %$rite prison v , . . , ( ^ «>," i
giserd with his Negro wards* In Scene Five;
tM»t crowd o£ figures silently enter the
clearing from ell side#. All ere -dressed - in Southern eoa twees of the period of the
fifties of the lest century* there are middle-aged mm who are evidently veil* -to-do planters . There is one sprue® *
%,®eillt Hine Flays> p. 21.
3#
authoritative individual--the Auctioneer. ' There is a crowd of curious spectators, chiefly young belles and dandies vbo law / cane to the slave«oarket for divert ion* / All exchange courtly greeting* in dumb \ shew and chat silently together, there is something still, rigid, unreal,
oarionattish iboot their aovsnents
In Seeaee Six and Seven Jones sees Hegso slaves being trans-
ported m a slave ship, and the figure of a dancing Congo
witch-doctor and hie devel-llke attendants* Each vision is
characterised by ttw eallformerlooatta actlmiu jaftMfeBimi
sicrv«flMm&#.|» the scenes mi .hsve just laentioned, the dialogue
is eawifil by, ,.|b@ toperor, md,. his
and around the figures whicli act as a visual background, tt
oust also he remembered that these figures are an essential
part of the continuity of the plot. Acceptance of them as
such is vital to the. success of the production.
This sasMi "actor-scenery" is effectively employed in
The Hairv Am, tank and his friend Long, uhile looking for
Mildred near a church on Fifth Avenue, octet a group of
puppet-lite figures resembling those in The fiaperor Jones»
0 *Meill describes the scenes
4lbid. p. 27#
37
j&stilm Jm& maitomfti ffitifi 1r nt »•»»» iftf -suit #rr itrr miF fittifc »h ua w - bakstife jd*^
TM6 <JIWB*I trOIB CtMlTCO @HC6t fXOHt the right, sauntering slowly and affectedly, their heads held stiffly up, looking neither to right nor left, talking in toneless, 8touring voices, fh® women are rouged, calc trained, dya<3, overdreroed to the nth degree. The men axe in Prince Albert#, high hats, spats, cones, etc. A procession of franksnatains la theirda-tached, mechanical vmmmmxms•«*
The mechanics! mmmmut not only adds an austere, distorted
atmosphere to the scenes but is a means by which 0 'Neill
is able to separate the imagined world from the real one.
In a naturalistic production, the world, as seen la the
Paginations of the characters, could not have been seen
by the audience. However, 0'Neill wade this possible la
US. tal m e 2 Sit fift&X, & K through the tech-
nique of actor~scenery. Strictly in the x^tttlonil
tradition, 0*Meill alloys the
of the audience, presenting in view the imaginary tortures of
the hero* In essence, the figures become a part of the
scenery, suggest in,g the locale, defining the situation and
dressing the stage. Corelik describes such technique as — ». — . , ,,
bio-«echanic8, or the application of a nechanical theory to
the actor.®
5tbid. p. 69.
Corelik, lew theatres for Old, p. 345.
33
The s e t t i n g s f o r The JSaxperor^ Jones and The Ha i ry Ape
are secondary t o fchafaoa^^ fcha , .tfowgh
t h e impor tance of t h a p a i n t e d scenery i s n o t s e c o n d a r y ^ % ©
Province tow. Players c a l l e d i n Claon Throcteaor ton, a^ young
e n g i n e e r t o design. s e t s , „£o r i , ^ , . ,Sa B g £aE^&ms<^MSS, - ! P#BSlSfe# ,
who was f o r a long t ime a aember of
Throekraorton caugh t . t h e s p i r i t of t h e p l a y . ? He worked^
ideas , j 0'Weill's des,cr|ia&^JgtA^^
each scene i n a g r a d u a l p r o g r e s s i o n i n t o a d r e a m - l i k e y^scnr^i^.f;.^ 'Wsfrnpyrz >X^>S* "«*# '"' - ",w'
quality, t h o u g h ^ s u g g a a t i v e l v realistic in appear-
a n c e . f o r Scene Two, i n which b e g i n s J o n e s ' j o u r n e y th rough
t h e raystic,.jil»gift*- . Q l l f i l l , , desc r ibes . , t he basic . . . se t . :
The end of the p l a i n where t h e G r e a t ^ f o r e s t b e g i n s , t h e fo reg round i s
\
sandy , l e v e l ground d o t t e d by a few s t o n e s and clumps of s t u n t e d bushes / cowering a g a i n s t t h e earth t o e scape \ the buffeting of the trade wind. In the rear of the forest is a wall of *Nn
d a r k n e s s dividing t h e world. Only when the eye becomes accustomed to the gloom can t h e o u t l i n e s of s e p a r a t e t r u n k s of the nearest trees be made out, enormous pillars of deeper blackness y
^Deutch, The Provlncetown, p. 68.
80'Neill, p. 17.
39:;
In Scan® T h m O'Heill add* aoonlight which seeps through
the forest, end an opening in the trees outlined by under-
brush and creepers. Scene Four open* with a road warning V- "I>( " •; \,.. ,-M, r ~i,< . , i, >. ,r". „ ,, , j. . 4.
across the stage left to right £lanl«ed by shrabbary.
A» JOW «ro^j^.ttojmwai<»gMii« o •jf«m E«ai»
for J®SP.,
will be no .naps,"?,..SiaUMMUJslJSRI,f fatJSRJ"?**
gigantic m l hatig loner over the stage with Hi® eerie
effect of like noon still visible. In Seme Six the foliage
forms an arch across the stage which almost* shuts out the
aoonlight* Scene Seven, the last expression!*tic scene, is
described thus by its creator:
The foot of a gigantic tree by the edge of a great river* A rough structure of j boulders, like an altar, is by the tree, j The raised river bank is in the nearer ;
background. Beyond this the surface of ) the river spreads out brilliant and un* { ruffled in the raooialight9 blotted out and ) merged into a veil of bluithi , mist in the distance .10
Every one of the semes uses painted scenery to frame the
action, usually set in stage colter, the outstanding feature
of the scenery is the use of moonlight to afeintain an eerie
%bid.. p. 23.
I0lbid.. p. 30.
40
atmosphere and to silhouette the mario-attt® figuret;, It
It interesting to not® that O'Neill's description of the
jungle # although seemingly rcwiantle at tiaes, is largely
®»ggestive«*raalla». Only in aoveoent, as whan tite leave*
shift to reveal the coed, it an expressionistic aspect
attained. The purpose of this sea l-real Lisa is to prevent
the diaafe »hqm figures fiw being lost, ti lfey wpld fee .11
placed in a distorted, baekgroynd*
O'Neill's suggestions asfee the change from one scene
to another as sta^le^£jgt§SfeJ^J^
One, the Bnperor's throne room, is only a. slaple set of
archways and open porticos vlth m single throne, *11 sur-
rounded by the @dg€i of the Jungle, In, j$«|,f
Players production, the ro« «»i &»&&•*& and
UTwmm«m%®&,$ much
11
island* ^ With a thrcme,
w® have tlia edge of the Jungle, the
Now begins the progression of jungle changes which 0 'Neiil
suggests to be done by m few additions and rearrangements for
each scene. Scene Eight returns to the edge of the Jungle as in Seen© Two, ' "" ' -"••'••••
Insane th Macgowwa and William Melnitss. The Living Stmm (Snglewood Cliffs, Mew Jersey, 1955), p. 480.
41
Clean Throckmorton conceived the Idea of using a done
to construct the jungle, Th© 4mm wut built by making m
overhead curve, much like m signing, the extension of the
small cycloraxia. The dome mm highly appropriate for the
mall Province town stage, giving an open air appearance
to an otherwise cramped area. The silhouette effect used
to present the hallucinations of the Qaparor n u Throctaorton^s
14m. mil was considered one of the high points of the pro*
duct ion. Throckmorton1 s part in the produetion was saerely
that of a technician; 0'Malll described the scenes and
Throetaortoa executed I;hem,
Anothar example of sat design to achieve an expression*
iatie picture la the one used in The Hairy km. In tills
particular play, 0*llalll aavas tha uaa of expressionisn
for one acana. This ona scena (Scene Five) portrays Yank
la tha sott desperate aoswnt in his saareh for Mildred*
Through expression!* tic aean« 0 'Belli tbovi by tha "distorted"
enotlons, tha dasparatlon which Yank feels, In Scene Five,
Yank and l*ong ara on Fifth Avenue, hopelessly searching for
Mildred• 0'Belli suggests:
42
A corner of Fifth Avenue In the flitis® on a fine Sunday momixig* A general itSBOipter* of clean, well"tidied, vide streets * flood of mellow, tempered sunshine{ gentle, genteel breezes. In tike fear, the show windows of two shops, a jewelry establishment on the corner, a farrier's next to It* Here the adorn* oents of extrasw wealth are tantalislngly displayed* The jeweler's window is gaudy with glittering diamonds, emerald*, rubies, pearls, etc.. fashioned in ornate tiaras, crowns, necklaces, collars, etc. From each piece hangs an enormous teg froa which a dollar sign and numerals in Intermittent electric lights wink cut the incredible prices. Eich furs of all varieties hang there bathed in a downpour of artificial light* The general effect is a background of magnificence cheapened and 'made gro-tesque by comercialisiB, a background in tawdry disharmony with the clear light and sunshine on the street itself.**
As in That teperor Jones, 0'Heill prescribes a seal-realistic
background to be dressed with mechanically novlng figures*
In this Banner 0'Heill completes an expresslonistic picture.
The effectiveness of the picture is obtained by the correct
balance of the real and the distorted subject. In Scene
Five the real, or more correctly the suggestively real,
is oppressed by the presence of Tank and Long, and the
reality of the dialogue. In The leaperor Jones* the reality
is found in the painted scenery and is balanced by the ' i*»«c.*£*v '"J** *•> ^
express lonis tic use of the silhrnietted figurfs. _ The balance
l20'Heill, p. 66.
43
in The Hairy Ape is completed by the distorted figures and
the exaggerated scenery. Tha distortion of reality seen
in both plays enhances the believability of the situation
and the acceptability of the message. ' O'Neill's use of
the realistic in a symbilic-expressionistic manner is
perhaps best clarified by a painting entitled "The Watches"
by Salvador Dali. Dali had used realistic detail in a
distorted manner for his theme. This use is "surrealism"
according to art definitions. In The laperor Jones, the
realistic jungle which moves in an unreal manner to reveal
the road would perhaps be better described as a surrealistic
effect. However, Dali's use of the real object in a dis-
torted manner is close, enough to O'Neill's use of the
distorted and real objects to see the point of comparison.
Frederic Carpenter makes an interesting reference to this
particular use of the real and unreal:
In The Hairy Ape (1922), 0'Neill used expressionistic devices and settings combined with strictly naturalistic details, so that the "real" achieved a symbolic quality through formal repetition and exaggeration.
-^Frederic Ives Carpenter, Eugene O'Neill (New York, 1964), p. 222,
44
Carpenter *s reference hgrs. Is. perhaps cl$#isr. to _«ti»t the art
world wwld tern surrealian, Itoverthaleaa, the, observation
point# oat O'Heill's use of the m l object In the symbolic-
espressionistic situation* It might be noted for purposes of
clarification chat The Hflirv Aae essaplifies the use of the
"reel" for a present*tionai purpose in other scenes than
Scene Five. We have already noted in a
that O'Neill worked expressionism Into The Hairy Ape with <
the scene in ifeLeh Mildred aces the hold of the ship,
O'Neill pointed out to us is that particular potation
that the stokers- nere not working as real s testers would,
therefore, it can be seen that fe© used the seeningly real
in this ®cewa In an unreal manner to empimBim. the plight
of the coraaon laborer, hi this instance he incorporated
the "real" to achieve a symbolic quality.
The problem in design to be reoM&sbered is the correct
relationship between the painted background and the hmam
figures who suppleso&nt the picture. The focal point will,
of course, be m the rawing background, the figures* Also,
the designer mist be careful to keep the picture in balance.
The expression istic features must not be so highly distorted
as to distract fro® the resit® fetes features in tita product too,
and likewise, the realistic elements oust not be m realistic
as to crver-shadow the expressionistic element of the pro-
due tloc. The wmin point to b© rex&mabemd la that the painted
scenery la secondary to the hmaan figures vho must present
the Imagined tiorld as seaa by the. main chamct»r.
O'Helll's use of expressionism m i not lfcslt&d_ to visual
fleets* In swtstl Instances he alloyed effects to
complete the distorted picture. Du&e Georg of Saxe-Keiningen,
the earliest producer to foster many of the production tech-
nl<ju©B titeln brought about the new stagecraft in Europe,
eoptutsixed the Importance of sound effects in stage pro-
duction. ,/.s an example, the Duke produced Schiller's flasko
In Berlin in 1875. Many of the sounds he used were alarm
bells, weapons beating on wooden doors end the eventual
splintering, many explosions, and distant clashing swords.
Meiningen carefully used these effects to heighten the
emotional effect of the production* He did not use sound
for its own sake altogether but, though naturalistic the
sound may have been, to supplement the over-all effect of
scene, (This was the same unity of elements sought for
by later European Innovators such as Stanlslavski and Antolne.)
46'
A1though. (0*mil 1 $m&-not naive me^o£ Bmm4 effect*,
he doe® sometimea call f o r thm. to eugpsent the expreaeionletic
picture, for en example, let m torn once again to The
Beginning w i t h the l a w rj. few notaente of Scene
One and ending with Scene S i g h t , O ' N e i l l c a l l s f o r t he use of
a tom-tom^ j t e joue^ , .££ . ^ ^ j ^ e a i M _ l c w u t e r and l o a d e r aa
Joro® it drowned d e s c r i p t i o n
fop ^ . M > e . *• of h i t in ten t ion® i n
symbolism:
Fron the distant hills cornea the faint, ' a teady t i n rap of a tom-tom, iw? and v i b r a t i n g . I t s t a r t s a t a r a t e exactly cor responding t o t he noxnal pulae b e a t — 72 t o the ialnuta*~&nd cont inuea a t a g r a d u a l l y a c c e l e r a t i n g r a t e fro® t h i s point *i»:taterr«ptedly to that very mtd of t he play.1*
.thai toa- taai c l e a r l y r e p r e s e n t s the
"•f1*®?. *«vagee le f»en t of the p l a y . However, t he auggeated
s a t e of the b e a t cannot be ignored by the d i r e c t o r . 0 t H e i i i , a
tawpo^ c o r ^ a p o i i ^ l i i g , ^ , a i d s i n
t*1® ®tair-ate^|» | i_,®©ve. towixd^ t t e e l l a a e t i e »oo»ent»*'the
Emperor 's d e a t h . L i t e t he a i l h o u e t t e d f i g u r e a , the tora-to©
^ • K e i l l , p . 14.
47
rhytbea is mi ossential part of the presentation, Gorelik
says this about the premiere producttcm of the flays
In the origin*! production by the Province town Player* this sound, which began at the beat of the norraal human heart, rote in tempo and volume until it filled the tiny Province torn theatre with an ocean of clamourous sound and lifted the hearers out of their seats. "
froa tfa:ls report of the original w#e of tiba tom-tom m em
see the dramatic effect, produced by the aound. 'Hue use of
tha tom-tora could be compared to the effect of a catalyst
in that the seemed to heighten, and ,accele£ilte.. $he
effect of the whole production.
in two other instances in The Wmi>®mT Jones., 0'Heill
calls for sounds which are essentially naturalistic in their
as© except that they di»tui*> the stlance and once again
heighten the anticipatory effect of tha scene. In Scene
Two O'Neill explains the particular effect of the soundt
A somber monotone of wind lost in the t
leaves aoana in tha air* Yet this ' sound serves but to intensify the im~ "") pression of tha forest's relentless \ Immobility, to form a background throwing \ into rjjief its brooding inplaccabla J
iSGorelik, p. 232*
X60'NeiUt p. 17.
48
Iter® 0 'Neill makes a paradoxical use of sound i n t h a t it
emphasises the s i l e n c e . Hi® experienced t h e a t r e worker
will have tlntdy realised that in the correct context the
X*ClC °* "*atd c*n b° i M * < L l ( i W l « I U k « M W U <
, 0 < m d I n **• , a m * *• i»M wsnticmsd, O'ttetll
emphasises Hie silence i n the jungle t o set..tjte.sicK?d f o r
Cl» f i r s t appearance of the w a r i ^ e f c t e - t ^ f i g u r e in
iHHIffflE i S M t * another i n s t a n c e , 0'Meill calls f o r
a development
i n Scene t h r e e , O'NeiU suggests*
Except f o r the hea t ing of th© tora~ta»» <•' which is a trifle louder and quicker than at the close of the previous ( se&gitt, fctere is iilwiei| broteit mweww \ few seconds by a queer , clicking scmiid**'
cllcldBgjwai" j# tiie sound of the d i ce being tossed
hy J e f f , the man Jones had killed in the United States.
T o 3 & a e * i a * t e r r i b l e on*^. m * 0 f m «
l»Mt. The sounds of Hie wind and Hie c l ick ing . 4U» a re
b r i e f but important i n th© scene. As we have i m t i m ^ , the
sounds of Hi® t w - t o a , Hie^ wtod and the c l i c k i n g d i c e , working
^together t ^ W I W | C of ^ otherwise ,yery naturalistic
m
effects being used to supplement the total espvessionis tte,
picturn, We cannot my that the sounds in thsmselves are
expressioatstict but the ©fleets they .offer through
increase In volume» rate, and merely breakingfche silence
provide the csqweaslonistic picture with proper emphasis.
Sugene 0 'lfelll rarely calls for detailed aikinip in
Ida experiiaerits with expressionism. He does, however, often
call for a specific cos tune design. In several of his plays
he combine# these two stadia in the fon of masiss* The
adoption of masks, of course, did not originate with the
mm stagecraft movmamxt, but m» a prominent caracteristic
of the Creek theatre « the Creaks used the mask to provide
the actor* who ®i$*t play several parts» with the oppor-
tunity to ehange character in a matter of minutes* 0 'Heill
in his obvious imitation of Greek tragedy would undoubtedly
males use of the mask technique* In his experimentation the
mask served several purposes. In The Hairy Aoe he employed
the taask la a much different way than seen cm the Attic
stage* Where the Creeks used the mask for a utilitarian
purpose, the mask in the new stagecraft is used much as
sound effects—to heighten the over-all effect* 0*Neill
50
suggests in The Hairy Ane that the robot-like figures m
'iPifth Avenue" appear in a Frankenstein image, looking
neither right nor left. Although the stage direction*
do specify the need for masks, O'Neill, acting as over*
seer, had 'tarionettos" given mask-like faces with the
aid of gause and collodion, a lacquer nade of cellulose
nitrates.I* 0'Meill had expert help in the awaking of the
males* Blanclie Hays, an experienced make-up artist,
worked out O'Neill's ideas for the a&sks. She had fabri*
cated the traditionally styled tribal sMUik worn by the Congo
witch doctor in Scene Seven of the Saneror Jones. 0'Meill
wanted all the 'tarionettes" in Seem Five of The Hairy Ana
to he dressed alike—the mm in Frince Alberts, the mmm
overdressed In gaudy gowns and furs—and lie wanted Misa
Bays to make their faces identically haughty and vacant.19
This she achieved by the clever method already mentioned.
As m have said, the uee of the mask by 0 'Meill wee
not a new stage device. This does not, however, sake its
use by 0'Meill one apart froa the new stagecraft. Edwin A.
Sngel quotes 0 'Meill aa saying about the masks
l*Carpenter, p. 100.
W6elb, 0'Meill. p. 495,
SI
A comprehensive expression is denended here, a chance for eloquent presentation, a new font of d n u projected from a fresh insight into the inner forces motivating the actions and reaction® of men and women*.««••* drmm of ioul», and the adventures of "free wills," with the masks that govern the® and constitute their fate#.*0
These coaaents reveal O'Neill's intentions to using the j
mask to represent, or to symbolise, the inner conflicts '
of his characters. At first glance, it would seem that
the masks are merely symbolic and in no my contribute
to an expressionistic style. But looking again we see
two things characteristically eapressionistie about their
use. first, the masks deal with the projection of inner
feelings*»*-iftfter realities of the character. In |jh& Great
Cod Brown, the mask becomes even a controlling force, com-
pelling the characters to act as they do. In the symbolic
play one object or detail of the environment is brought
forward-; to syrabolia;© the whole or perhaps the environment
is reduced to one symbol. In The Great Sod Brown* for
©ample, the masks go beyond being just a subtle detail for
the purpose of representing a total idea. Indeed the masks
20angel, The H»unt«d HetoM of Eujama O'fclU, p. 93.
52 \
becaao a definite part of the plot, c!raving attention to
stovy i-athar than, t^kii^ its place. The sucoud char-
acteristic is tliu disturbance the masks issJ.ce in an other-
WJ.BC iiaijui'iilistie environment. In earlier definitions
of expressionism, we pointed out that in expressionism
toe objective vwzid is in order to suggost an
u-wtiwata, iuai^ r^ailcy. O'il-iill's uso j! tlia ;;iastc surras
chit very same purpose.
iii twj plays J'Kaili ;aakes particular use of the mask,/
Tha Great God Brown unquastionably raprasaats 0'Haill's
altiuate axparimant with the mask. lie explains:
Brown has already envied the creative force in Dion which he himself lacks. Whan he steals Dion's mask of Mephi-stopheles he thinks he is gaining the power to live creatively while in reality ha is only stealing that creative power mads self-destruetiva by complete frustration. This devil of moulting doubt makas short work of him. It enters him, rending him apart, torturing and transfiguring him until he i® even forced to waar a mask of his success, William A. Brown, before the world, as well as Dion's mask toward life and children.... Dion's mask of pan which he puts on as a boy is not only a defense against the world for
53
the super-sensit ive painter-poet under-itaath i t hut atao an bits&&M\ pa>;t of. h is e b u t e t a r as the a r t i s t . ^ the world Is not only Ml**d to tine wm tieaeatfc I t but a l t o sneers a t and condsons tha
noafc I t s«k**j „ z -
0 ' t i a i l l iisoa siaisks i n Tin-: Gr«s*t Sort B i w j to shw laany
ahslas o f diaigl.it h s a o t l o a u ^ S In Th*» IXi-l.i.'g aa<3.
as we sha l l see. lacar , >. Lazarus Laughed.* the *a&0k Is
a pare af t l » njuke-ip, *ts#d co l l ec t i ve l y ix#
croato a si-a^le atE^riU l a H a Etowwcor J m m „ and i n
a la tee p lay , *-Xl GoU'g J h l l l u a Got Wixtm » « Otois o aitsk
A?Me.V'r;S a »$8&olic lapartstic^.» But i n The Sreas Ccxl
Brows - the characfcsiafS are of t h j stasias an-I the t he f t
of cmc: baccraes an iraprirtasit pa^rt of tin© play* O ' N e i l l ' i
descr ipt ion of tha masks i s t2« stage d i rec t ion* ©alls
f o r more than the stage technician Is able to achieve#
f o r example, i n hla f i r s t descr ipt ion of Dion ha suggest®!
Re i s about the sas® lie 1tht as young Brawn but l a m , w t t f 9 without repose, cont inual ly to rest less R s r w s w e * »ent# l i # face la stacked, the siaete i s a f iscal fo rc ing o£ M s own face-* dark* s p i r i t u a l * poet ic , passionately
^^Gorel ik , p# 233#
G o r d o n Y. M i l l a r , | u ^ n e % *1^113, i M fe #M*y*fQ#a C r i t i c (London, 1962) p .
34,
supersensitive, helplessly unprotected in let childlike, religious faith in life—into the expression of a nocking, reckless, dcflnt, Kiyly scoffing and sensual young Fan."
lew to obtain a "boefcing, reckless, defiant, gayly scoffing
and sensual young fan" mask could only be a thing of chance *
Moat of the other masks call for a reproduction of the
features of the "wearer showing one expression of a par*
ticular feeling. This la in Itself a taxing job. Critics
of the play found the appearance of the masks an awkward
buslneaa for the aetore, eapeelally in Intimate scenes.2*
Ocelli's uncertainty about what ha net doing naa revealed
in a letter the dramatist sent to Benjamin la Casseres in
June, 1927* In the letter he confessed that the double"
personality conveyed by the masks was not included in his
intentions, He wanted the masks to become a mystic part
of the people rather than the motivating forces behind
them.25 Perhaps O'Neill realized too late that the masks
did not do all he expected. The masks, did, hoover, create
an interesting effect. **-X
*Vneill, p. 310»
24Miller, p. 38.
25lbld.» p. 39.
55
With Lazarus Laughed O'Keill has a different use for tha
mask. Ill Mill for a chorus o£ forty-nine pe^lC) each
wearing a different kind of aask. Hit diicriptiont tre very
detailed:
All of these people are masked to accordance with the following scheme: There are seven periods of Ufa •haunt Boyhood (or girlhood), Youth, Young Manhood (or WoB&nho®^, Manhood (or Wonsnhaod), Middle Age, Maturity and Old Age; and each of these periods la represented by seven different masks of general typaa of character as follow) the Staple, Ignorant; tha Happy, Eager; the Self•Reliant; the Servile, Hypocritical; tha Savengeful,
^ Cruel; the Sorrowful, Resigned. Thus in each crowd (this includes among tha mm the Sevan Guests «ho are composed of one stale of each period-*ty$»e as period one—type one, period two-type two, and so on up to period seven—type seven) there are forty* nine different combinations of period and type* Each type has a distinct pre* dominant color for its cos tunas which varies in kind according to its period* the masks of tha Chorus of Old Man are double the sise of the others* They are all aavwn to the Sorrowful, Resigned type of Old Age.2#
This use of so nany different siasks by so aany people was an
idea, according to Gorelik, evidently derived from Pollux's
Ho'llelll, pp. 381-382•
56
mpmvt of tba Graak thaatro* I t wmM mmm th&t 0*lai l i
«ik*d for tha mmm tapoitibXa. I t la l u n l y a d i f f icu l t
m«k for tha daalflnar to capture In daa ipi the flaifca
diffaranaa bttwMn Mtho Happy" and "Bagart" or ^Boyhood"
and "faiitfc*H Critics fpure dttploasad with tha Malta
baaauaa ttiay aaaaiad t® aeevt no dlaeovarabla paspoi t .^
The public <114 aot waiter® fcaxid 0*tlaiXl'« ptirpoaa for aaske
mid found them to hm con£uulnga
Yb© axpxaaaJAiiiatie affact of tha «Mk aaa -aartainly
aclii«¥ed in. The Hairv APC-_ -vibmm i t ac«ipl£®mEttad other
t a c t i c a l a f faa t i to paint as aapvaMtanftatla picture*
lsi The Craat Cod trowa and L&saruc Lamaliad. tha
maak la tha oaa present^tioriai alwurat, i t s ana ia not
sufficient t® portray fch® "bayaod raality" aura originally
Intended. Xta praaanca in th* e the r i s e naturalistic
situation ia« cmfyoisig*
With a l l tha axpraaaiooittic effects «a hmm aaatiaoad
in ttm Eaaaror Jonas* fiagana O'tialll showed ttlaaalf to be
meter of tha mm #taga©£»ft, The Hairy Ana eoaf issued thia
aahiavaNant* Both of fchase play* uaad eba "new'' fonae
27Goralik, p« 234,
3?
tftxouglKMt* making fchea the chief b&fiis of production* la
this respect their use-<<w*s tmdesstsnd&fcXe. In feSEMt
mod Brow and Lasatus Laatiied the use of j»#£ _ « new
device, la both cases tte aask, s®«sae.to., tbmt jmt
of proper perspective any taetmi ue.of .
loses its perpo»@£uli*©»i * Alt taaches the technician, that
techniques of theaew stag@ci»£t» for ©xaiaple the expression*
istic style, are best viewed whm every .part, of the pro*
dwcticm, or the scene, helps fco portray the style being used.
Perhaps this explains #iy certain O *H«iiil flays «hieh employ
the new stageesaft have failed,. and also *ihy some have
resulted as his greatest works*
In N^isI plays O'ieill experineafeed In praaenta*
timmllm without the distorted reel ley of esipres®i0i3.l®Bi*
These plays depend insfesd on * allure of other styles,
symbolism usually being the predominant one* the value in
looking et this phase of esqperiroatetioa is mot to dis-
cover e cooparable digree of success or failure but rather
the study will prove to be an interesting examination of
the mm stagecraft in an approach other than through
expressionism* > Therefore» let us consider this different
58
approach, surveying again O'Neill's suggest loos for actor
grouping, mt d®slpsa «ns»a e€f«ct», cootuae, and aake-up,
mdI the problems ttaposed by titeiir use#
tmmasim m m m m or "she wm smeEcmrr"
AS mu.nm BY miens a'miix
cmffEi in
Syabolian «nd Otter Stylaa
Eugene 0 *K«U1 gained wrld-mtde recognition through
his espartamita witfc expressionism, and Im never lost his
seal for ex{Ngrl»entation. In tlae, honrwsr, this seal was
diaiiaifitod by ©#B*till*® personal desire to reveal the
circuastances of hit past# The plays following Thetaperor
Jones and fig, ItaiCT Ape begun to talc® mi the naturaliatie
flavor of tht early ona-act 'tJlancalm" aaa flay®. This
gradual return to sea»i*realism ««s primarily revealed in
the dialogs® 9 whila aasy aspects of the plays continued
to ghm? mMmmm of experimentation to fcte ue® stagecraft.
As a result, many of these playa mm& to be presentational
in their stage pictures yet closely naturalistic in dialogue.
Classifying th®sn plays according to style in either script
or production is a difficult matter* Often naturalit©,
59
60
raaat icism, esqpres sicmisti, and eytttsolisa vrill appear in
d i f f e r e n t aspects in the eawz play. Invest igat ion of these
d i f f e r e n t aspects nevertheless stent ouch the *mm I d t t i of
ex^erifflentiitiaa O ' l e i l l employed in The BBtuegpg J ones and
The Hair? &p««
The mm of actors to suggest the visual background i s
again used in 0 'Wei l l ' s play dealing with the subject of
t&iscagena t ion, ' &£1 fed'f, M M ® §2E i n previous
invest igat ion of ac tor groupings , the usage included wove-
aaa t as well as b i t s of dialogue* The groupings m m an
important par t of the p l o t , d i rec t ly re la ted to the, act ion
of the main claara<?t@rs. For eaMspie, the f igures which haunt
the E&speror Jonas are d i r ec t ly re la ted to t heac t i cm in tha t
they drive Jones on to mmnitj and his death. , to M k m y ,
flMllyaa Got MixisiB* 0 'MeHi uses actor groups cm several
occasion® only to s e t the sew© and to complete the p i c tu re .
Zn h i s descript ion of the opening scene, Q>'Belli says:
The f i r e escapes a re crowded with people. In the s t r e e t leading l e f t , the faces are a l l v h i t e j in the s t r e e t , leading r i g h t , a l l b lack . i
^©•iteili, Ulne Flays. p . 91.
61
wxtoijfi s!»g« «?irscti<3&«» refosr to she "sfcraat «*S
tha whites® " and to the "'street o£ the blacks." In Scan©
Two of the firs?; Act O'Hclll ns#s tho aa»e Actor groupings
fca chsmgt* the ataosphere fraa the preceding scene. Tha
directions read as If th«y wave description* Cor a eet
design:
On« street is ecill all hita, the other all black. The fire escapes are laden with drooping huttam beings.*
Tha "•drooping human belongs" 4a not move but prepare tha
audience ?or tha ooaing trouble, Under laroija® ataadarda
they tmy famm hmm painted a* part of ttse ternaryv if Indeed
they m m used at all. la a later scene tha figures do nova.
Act Oaai, Scene Four la conpotsad lar&ely of a pantonine pre-
sonCation of th« wadding of Jim and SJtla, the hero and
heroin*. Actor groupings fom a major part of the scetiery.
As tba wadding belli smmd from tha church, tenants emerge
fro® the divided streets, the Slacks" on one aide, the
"whites" from the other. Symbolically tha purpose la
obvious , and th® veanti show axi inganioua understanding of
direction*
VNeill, p. 228»
62
Marco Millions employs the same format. We retaember that
in Lazarus Laughed O'Neill had used his chorus of forty-nine
men and women, grouped in different costumes and masks, to
suggest the conflict of civilizations and religions. In
Marco Millions 0'Neill uses actor groupings on a divided
stage to suggest the conflicts of the East and West.3 Marco
Polo, his father, m d uncle are received in many royal courts
during their travels, Always the court room Is filled with
the same figures, though they are in different costume each
tine, the group includes "a mother nursing a baby, two
children playing a game, a young girl and a young m m In a
loving embrace, a middle-aged couple, an aged couple, a
coffin."* Though they never speak, the group closely
resembles the chorus from Lazarus Laughed. Fart of the
symbolic representation of both groups Is a visual summary
of life from birth to death. 0*Neill undoubtedly was trying
to symbolise the universality of his themes. Frederic
Carpenter, speaking of the expressionistlc effects in The
Hairy Age, explains that their symbolic quality in the play
^Carpenter, Eugene O'Neill, p. 117.
^Carpenter, p. 222.
63
Is achieved "through formal repetition end exaggeration•
It cam be seen that In Marco Millions. Kapatltioa and
exaggeration of the same figures in different scenes drove
bmm the Bfmholic meaning#
In both All Cod'» Chilian Cot Win«« «ad Harco Mllliong
0 'Weill demonstrates knovledgeability of act tor placenent.
The benefits 0b tallied by ©ueh placement asm mill, illustrated
in these plays. , In All God'e Chlllun Sot jfiaaa the "nhite"
characters a m always kept opposite the "black" character®»
In tikia 1my the diviaion of racest alao represented by the
divided streets, ia emphasised* The placing of the figures
cm the stage opposite the Poles alao represents ia Marco
Millions a division, this tine a division of cultures* the
modem director has already learned that the placement of the
actor has a variety of effecta on hia acceptance by the
audience$ depending on the position. O'Neill in his desire
to use the actor symbolically surely realised the advantages
that could be had with planned placement of these figures*
Strict adherence to O'Neill*a suggestion in his stage
directions is essential to the success of the production,
the symbolic content in the tm> plays we have tsaeatioried is
Scelb, 0'Weill, p. 557.
64
lost \mlm& the grouping© are presented ta Hie dira®tecl
£om* This is o$l untumMtl with Sugene 0 'Keill » the
directors of hi* plays will find that each aspect is
related to another and become* an irreplaceable link in
the whole; this la tibe supre&e tenat of the a w stagecraft.
Tim Important point to be i esribered akwsi the actor
groupings ia that all are secondary figures, part of the
expressioni*tic or syobolic background of the play.
Set dasi&t la alao an important part of these pm»
mmmtimml«mturali#tic plays. Huch like d m seta in
The Baseror Jones and lato A m . the set designs for
these assume a stylized nature i&lla retaiaiag a 8ug«
ge®civ©-realistic appearance* Heinhawit employed this
sense of atyliaatlon in t&e Miracle in that co®£tm© designs
mere fashioned after the gold and jseeled shrines of a
medieval cathedral.6 Again tuning to All Oad'i Chilian
Cot Wlnae we find that 0'Belli calls for a setting which
is tantamount to expressionism in style, with awry aspect
£w» color to properties designed to represent the uncross-
able gulf between the Uegro hero and the ii» heroine •? In
%orelik, Www theatres for Old, p. 119.
%iller, Mrnm® Q'Nelll and, the. American Critic, p. 36.
65-
Act One the gulf is represented by the divided street already
mentioned* In Act Two it 1® represented by the picture of a
Hegro in modern legionnaire costume and asi African tribal
ouk, Ai Jim and Ilia begin to smother each other with
fflissnsJem tending, the room gradually gout smaller before
the ®y@s of the audience m& She symbolic setting becomes
an ezpressionistic device. The idee is reminiscent of
Sdtasrd Gordon Craig's moveable screens* It would
M » as Impracticable as w s Craig's method of making
tib® screens raove, Unless a suitable method can be found,
moving vails an tli® stage appears to be an undesirable
practise, regardless of extant of ijebolic representation•
Unless it were done perfectly, the distraction would be diffi-
cult to avoid and the setting of the stage with the primitive
mask and portrait, not to mention furniture, -would be
hampered by tlm contracting walls. The critics of All God's
Chilian Got W I u e s did not aention the technique but mm
move interested in the themes of the play. We nay assume
eldar that the designer of the production realised the
difficulty of the moving walls and did not attempt the effect,
or that it was done successfully.
66
All Cod'i Chillun Cot Wing,* once again Illustrates Chat
Sugene 0 'tieill w c aluwys deeply interested In tfa« scenic
background of his plays* Evidence ha* already been pre-
sented indicating that he carefully suggested the kinds
of setting* which he wanted* H© wroto Baeir® Under the Slots
with a particular setting for it in aind.** As previously
stated, O'Neill often drew floor plan* for his plays to
be sura that they i**ra built precisely as he intended, but
with Bssin* Under tdae Sins he went further than floor plans.
0 'Xteill pictured a set that would include a kitchen and parlor
downstairs, and two bedrooms upstairs, as well as <i section
of £axmia»d outside the house* For these im drew four
sketches* each showing the faushouse in between tm large
elm trees* Xn the first sketch, the front wall of the fam-
house 1# shown, in the second the interior of the kitchen
is shown while the other room* are still hidden by the front
wall* The third sketch reveals the parlor, and the fourth,
the two bedroens separated by a wall through which 3ben
and Abbie stare lustfully at each other*
O'Heill poetically describes the set in & special para*
graph preceding the first aett
%laek» 1 "Robert fidraond Jones," p* 169*
67
Two cmowwii else oh lwc% side uz the imtm* Tlmy bead ttteir t r a i l ing b m n t e down, ohm % the r>o£, Ti»y appear to p r o t e c t and a t the same tlbm eubdue. Tlmt^ it» m s in i s te r maternity in thei r u p t e t ! n crushing, Jealous absorption. Thoy have 4®mt&pe4 iwm their intimate con* tmt wltb th& li"e >>€ f&ari in the liout an apalling ha§a*iofies®* They brood opf»sittwly ovar the house. They are likes exhausted m m resting thei r sagging breasts &/<& band* and ts&lx on i t s roof* m4 %$mm i t rains tljeir tears t r ickle 8mm, mm&tmmelj m& r o t on tli@ ihiflglai.
the alas play a peculiarly symbolic part in thm pmmntmt&ms
on® that la difficult to capt&are with paint and "The.
M t t e Earth** is a favorite thma of 0'Belli, Sound in Mmmmd.
the Horizon as well, The pretence of the @te» add# a
peculiar touch to th© action. In prosperous® mmmmm tlmy
smm protecting| in m&mmity they appear demanding, despairing*
Robert Sdnoxtd Jkmm eaeecatied the aata f o r th® production.
Using th© f o u r steetehea which 0*10111 bad utada at a stagnant Ion
for tli® patting, Jonea daalg»d the and of a typical law
England farmhouse. Ho deslptad th® in such a way tlwt
each r o w could be seen e i t h e r alone o r In eoofeinetiQn with
any others. te cm«s m i teas to bm closed off, a panel
^Joseph Shipley, Xfe && of, SBSSSE. g,fcUl. (Seattle, 1928), pp. 22-23.
$a
depicting the exterior a? the house would be alid into pime®*
Since a fieri® was not to use in the original production,
the panels were perhaps made oi another ©afcssrial with
major dependence on lighting techniques to attain the
desired effect. Jona* chose a pumpkin yellow to color
the exterior, thn color o€ hia own hoiaastaad,*® Jones
m ® very pleased with O'Neill's idea arid aioscuted the set
just as O'Neill had suggested. Perhaps hia execution
too faithful, because the removable panels proved to be
difficult to handle as well m time-cosistimlns. 0 'Weill
t»a pleased with the tense but « 8 disappointed la the els
tree®,
. With Pes Ire Under jfee fflms > O'Neill combined success-
fully the technical and literary fotta. Eliminating the
retired visual effects of the play will forfeit the play's
Intended effect. Critics mare impressed by the setting it*
that 0 'Kelll had once again departed from the usual tech-
niques in stage mechanics, Once again ws have no idea how
the setting affected the vierors since critics paid more
attention to the theme of the play rather than i t s decor***'
i0Black, p. 171
1XMiller, Sugeng. O'Neill jwd American Critic, pp. 36-37
69 .
At this point let us move further and once again look
at O'NviU'i use of sound affects• In All Cod's Ghilltm Got
Wings. Act One is significantly enhanced by a sarias of
songs which fon a sound effects background. Act One of
the play is sat on tha street which divides the Magro side
of the straat from the whit® side* In each e&m, the songs
m&rn to answer M a another: sometimes humorously, othar
times lass hunorously* for Scana Ona tha diractions read:
Prom tha straat of tha whitas a high* pitched, nasal tenor sings tha chorus of "Only * Bird in a Gilded Cage." On tha straat of tha blacks a Negro strikas up tha chorus of: "I Guess I'll Rave to Telegraph Hy Baby*" As this singing ends, there is laughter, distinctive in quality, from both streets.*-2
Tha purpose for these two songs would saw to fee to provide
an introduction to fche atmosphere in which tha whole play
is set, O'Neill, in describing tha straat scene uses the
adjective phrase "ruminative lasy," This phrase also
aptly describes the atmosphere which the two songs in Scene
One supply* For Scene Two the white tenor sings, *%ee, 1
Wish That I Had a Girl," and is answered from tha Negro side
with "All I Got Was Sympathy*" Again the songs are followed
120'Netll, Mine tUT., p. 91.
/V
by laughter, but this time It la an uneasy ehuekla. The
scene la concerned with a Negro spurned by a whit© girl
with whoa he is in love. tilth this in mind, the song#
see® to predict the happenings to come in the scene. The
stage dlnetloot for Scans Three read in part:
from the atract of the Whites the tenor, mora nasal thirn ever and a bit drunken, walla In high barbershop falaatto tha last half of tha chorus of 'Vhen 1 Loat You.M
Tha Hegro voice, a bit maudlin in turn, rapliea with the leaf half of ,lKait!»t For the ictoert 1* I*ee
Thia tine tha songs are followed by only complete silence
before the beginning of the scene. The songs grow store
maudlin as the plot becooes more and mom involved with
tragedy. Much like the tarn-tern effect in The Smperor Jones>
the songs in <111 Cod*s Chlllun Sot Wings« though naturalistic,
help to aid in aatabliahing the ataoaphere for each scene*
In Scene Four, the pantonine wedding scene, the songs take
on a different flavor. From the Negro side of the street
cone three stanaas of a melancholy song. The first stanaa
repeata "Sometimes X feel like a mourning dove," and is
followed respectively by "Sometimes 1 feel like SKI eagle in
13lbld.. p. 102.
71
in the air," and I wish that I had never been
bom/'14 So ends Act One in a near tragic atmosphere
wade possible in part by the effect of the mournful tonga.
The effect of the songs in All Cod's Chillun Cot Wing*
is by no oteans the saa© effect acquired by songs in musical
comedy* In the musical comedy the songs may indeed be a
part of tha plot, but can usually be left out and the plot
will remain intact. 0 'Heill uses these songs to fulfill
the symbolic intent of the play. Without than the scene
would not be complete.
Moving again to another new stagecraft technique, we
find in 4!^ Cod's Chilian got Wings a brief yet important •
suggestion for costume* Just as he used the masks in
Lagarun Laughed and The Creat Cod Brown. 0 'Neill uses
costume in All Cod's Chillun Cot Wings, and,as w» shall
see later}in Mournii^ Becomes fiesta and Marco Millions,
to complement th© daairad affect of the play. In these
three plays, the costumes carry out the symbolism within
th® play* In Act One, Scan® Two of All Cod's Chillun Cot
Wings. 0'Main describes two teenagers, a boy and a girl,
14Ibid.. pp. 109-110.
the boy feigned in black, the girl in white.1-* Later in
Scene Four of the same net, O'Neill offers the following
direction:
The halves of the big church door swing open and Jim and Ella step out from the darkness within into the sunlight. The doors Him behind theai like wooden lips, Jim is dressed in black* Elle in white, both with extreme plainness.16
Obviously the purpose hem is to suggest the racial differences
brought out to the play*
Because of all these references to black and whit®, both
in costume and scenery, Che over-all theme of MJkiails.
Chillun Cot Wings would mm to be c m of miscegenation since
the story deals with the love between a Negro man and a white
woman. However, critics have doubted that the thane is really
concerned with miscegenation. Indeed the names "Jim" and
"Ella" indicate that O'Neill was thinking of his mother and
father. The trouble Jim and Ella have in their marriage
perhaps in some way represents the marital problems of James
and Ella O'Neill. Yet O'tieill's suggestion for black and white
costumes, as well as other devices indicating a separation
I5Ibld.. p. 96.
l6Ibid.. p. 110.
71
b*Cv*3n the ft*£S0 anJ tJva white, seaa to sus£&«t t in t 0 ' t tel l l
&aok (praat 9*1*18 tii mg&atia® t ju dime *2. tm9m$mat$xm9
t.f this I # FTO, h i t rs&SRWNSE to black, aad xdhita OOSCUBIO*
iu & syafciltc my to ^saphaat^u th* sspazatwacu
Although tha ®agg«£i«'is far eascucae X» s i s M i & a t i t o
iSSHSSE ---«*?> riviy shcii# ££» tacnroughmss with uhieh
iiipssa O *Holll mtfQov&td Mm pl*y« «iefe t&altalqp** of Sim new
Had shay r-svoal a, soantagftil fiumlpulattok of the
IMWSf 8t*ffiflH5 X* f t •
He 1mm already w>t*d in Marco mi l l aea fcfe&f: 0*11*111
«*«• a mpmtiZlsm of :?tguree in aooh ecntrt a t A t e l the
fol% men mmimd* Th& dl££az«nc«a In locale ar©
8*nfc*d primarily through Othtr £!*«» th* co*tun**»
o®iy * f*r chan ts la fiaa^iagii and m i l pftlatead 1-. sckgro-ande
h*lp to allow t t e differences la local** Bacaua# of the
co*tun*a» how©*®*, dia mtdimm la able to «## * algpi&flatat
progre»©t<» oZ local**. Today CM* fcochnlqu® would bo
standard practice, hot a t tfca tin* of It* mMga it mm not
emmm to aug&aat local* only fcteotagfe th* m o£
To tkm nafeamliste thl» would ha*** he&a an iMumplmtm *t#ag»»
fcobart BdmmA Jmm& had used t t e m m tadtoiqpa In bin fro*
duotiasi of J f e mil ffliy Haggled §, Pianfe Wife. In this
74
production, costume® ware a noteworthy means of estab-
lishing the Iseili and the period. It can be suggested
that the same idea was employed by 0 *Neill In M m w
Millions! 0*Keiirs close association with Jones easily
explain® Ocelli's use of costume In till# way.
to look st Mwthir exaaple of O'Heill's unique
employment of aostune, lot «a turn to the flay which in
every iiptet represents Q'Heill's suprea© attempt Ia his
experimentation • WM production of Mourning SftSSBtfc JOtflttft
introduced several firsts to the American tlxeatre, the
trilogy in * thirte^-act series being perhaps the moat
noticeable. With Mourning Becomes glectra. based on the
curse of the house of Atreus, O'Malll saade his supreme
sttwyt at classical tragedy on tha nodarn stage. In the
progression of the play, Christine Mairnon, who is tha
prototype of Clyteoaiestra, poisons her husband, gam
ttasmon, tha prototype of Agamemnon, tha M»aea,» children
are Laviaia and Or in, tha Ilectra and Orestes of the play*
Lavinia and Orin plot tha death of their aot&ar* much like
Ilectra and Orestes„ After they have harassed Christine
until aha kills herself, 0 •Weill carries the story a bit
further, having Lavinia take on the characteristics of hair
75
mother and become raore like h®r i n every wsy* On® of the
means O'Xeill ummS to show this assumption of the mm
character by Lavinia is through the visual ©earns of cos*
turn* The first description of Christ tee antI Lavinia reads $
Christine Mannon i s a t a l l striking-looking woman of forty but she appears younger* ilia 'has a fine, voluptuous figure and she moves with a flowing animal grace. She wears a green satin dress* s a a r t l y cut and expensive, which brings out tile peculiar color of he r thick curly hair, p a r t l y a copper brown, p a r t l y a feronse gold, each shade d i s t i n c t and ye t blending with Hie other*. •. Lavinia cosies o a t to tlie top of the s tep* where tier mother had stood* She i s twenty-three but looks considerably older* fall like her mother, he r body $ tort* if iMih m ill arm Jt -ahMMk ifflriwlh iri§
11 13113® M M p M M tier i f fed by her plain black dress **7
The costume# suggested In these directions were chosen by
0"Weill to carefully fit the personalities of the characters*
as wel l a s t o establish the per iod and ecmpliixteat the
characters* Christine, who is vivacious and foil of life*
i s appropriately dressed i n green sa t in* Q'Melll perhaps
chose green t o suggest the Jealousy Christine has of the
reletionship between Lavinia and £*.%*• Lavinia, who i s
WLXMmVmmi MflHBI flrOffllSSMIISw® U&y II®!? $ WBMKV fUS® Ullft t! t STJMBtIV®
i7Ibld., pp. 6*0-692. i PPl P PPPi1 mr w*
7$
'•withdrawn" black dress, is the third pert of the trilogy,
after Christine's suicide, Lavinia. becomes th® prototype
of bar Mother. 0*Kelll describee her:
At first glance, on© w M alst&te h@r for her no their as she appeared in the First Act of "ftmeconing," She SOSMS a mature waMn, sure of har £«minln« attractiveness• Har b row-gold hair la arranged as har mother's had been. Her groan draaa is the copy of har mother's la Act One of "Bmeaaisig.** She cones forward slowly* Tha movements of har body now have tha feminine grace har mother's fcad possessed.*®
Once again 0 'Heill employs the visual affaots of costuaes to
achieve that which la not easily said through dialogue. Tha
effectiveness of ©f«eillfe experiments is in his ability to
m&lm dramatic point# visually which is essential in tha
concepts of the new stagecraft.
In several of the stage directions used as examples
of this point, the suggestions call for actions and
feelings which are difficult to capture on the stage. Xn
Mourning Becotsea Electra O'Neill makes another, though
different, experiment with the mask* It is difficult to
classify this particular use of the nasfe as either make-up
l*Ibld.. p. 025.
77
or costume, Throughout tins play 0'Neill instructs tha
characters to assume a maak-lika quality with their faces*
Turning once again to the first description of Chriatixia to
find an exaripla of these suggestions nm find;
Bar faoa ia unusual, bandana rather than baautiful, Qtm ia struck at once by tha strange impression it gives in repose of being not living flaah hut a wonderfully life-like pale mask, in which only tha deep-set eyes of a dark violet blua are alive,*'
In another instance, tfoich ia representative of many, the
direction* for another character reads
Ona ia struck at a glance by tha peculiar quality his face in repot* has of baistg a life-like mask rather than living flaah,20
0*Melli IMS obviously not interested. In using the real mask
ha proffered these suggestions# Be had already found
in tha productions of Jhg, Great Cod Brown and Laaarue
Laughed that a«di«inces could not understand or comprehend
the symbolic intent of tha mask, His suggestions in
HouminE 1 m m m Ilectra seem to font a compromise between
bis fear of using actual masks and tha desire to recreate
19Xbld.. p. 691,
" W . . P. 103.
?s
clastic*! tragedy. 0 Htoill •• suggestions ace weak if we
consider that tt is impossible for the aefcor to interpret
tils chacaetav facial ttspstsston hidden by A
mask. Hits only alternative would he a use of make-up which
would uste tfti© actors lean believable. With the puppet-like
quality %tiieh make-up wold offer, their words would ba
lata significant; ana might say "out of proportion," lt&
final analysis, OHteill's intentions in these suggestions
for the employment of raesks are understandable; however,
in practical term® they are unattainable.
The important thing to he noticed at this point is
that O'lte ill's seal for ©xperiisentation [email protected] a moti-
vating force throughout hi* writing career, Hhat was
actually achieved by the experimentation and what develop*
raent it receive will he discussed in the next chapter.
We have m , mvwtlielm, th«t tram 2 » Broegor Jon«».
his first work la experimentation with the mm stageexaft,
to Mowmtng Becomes Ilectra, perhaps his ultimate in experi-
mentation» the intensity of 0*1X0111*8 search for the new
never dwindled.
F10DUCTI0H m S M i q m S OF "THE HIW SraGgCftftTT"
AS mn,izm m EBGWE o'mmL
cmmm iw
Conclusion
Rovani»«r 27» 1953, is the date of Eugene 0'Me ill's
death, that day occurring ironically early In Us® decade
tbit M V the production of son of 0*110111'E plays t&ia
any other playwright's. Only Sean Q'Caaey provided &
mserablanc® of competition for 0'Meill during the fifties.
It is extraordinary that O'Neill gained public acclaim
twice | one© in the tmmttm and one# in the fifties after
his death.1 Hoover, it is not surprising, because of the
experiment* nature of hie sewk, that 0'Heill should have
draim such mixed reactions €n» his critics as represented
hf his rise to favor, the loss of it, end the rise to it
again.
O'tfeill « s certainly a major dramatist, and his
historical importance remains unquestioned,
*John Gasener, Eugene O'Sfeill (Minneapolis* 1965)9 p. 16$,
80
disagreement concerning the greatness of hi# themes and
the (luecMM of hit Innovations in techskiijpie baa existed
since tV* beginning!! of his career. In fii# tirljr
twenties he w s considered the beet of modern dsaaatiate
by eosa© j others disaiissed hi# work as tngigmi #|:pnm r la
194$ George Jean Hathan aaid of hie friend* "the great body
f i f c . w J*fc nfl liMiiiiii i ^ ^ f r w n M f e J i l f c j i f i J l jjrtfgiah JX a m anil<wm *'<* ifiv m*
%wC IWLS WPSrX BHUI ® 91JMI wHBWi p jLCMMKHI QCHE> !OWB®B6Sy
approached by my other American." Two years later the
i-ondon Times Literary Supplement declared that 'lleill'e
world is a beitiary full of vulpine animals and crushed
w m i 1 1 and described the ideas Is hie playa aa 'Wils*
ciplined mmtimw and jejune opinions •
Few will deny that Eugene O'Maill represented la his
time everything that was truly and basically modem about
the American, theatre* He certainly ref lected the modern
theatre in Europe, employing in M a experimentation the
techniques of staging and playwriting that European into*
vators had discovered over a period of approximately fifty
years*3 This experimentation ia, after all# what permitted 2Carpenter, mmam O'Heill. p. 168,
%aa«ner, Buaene O'Neill* p. 165.
81
0*Meill to gain Ills reputation Ioee it, and gain It once
more* Fro© tfca tlam of his early career with the short
Glencairn pUji, through euch expressionis tic dramas as
The Beparor Jones and |tg8 Hair? Ape, to his "self-purgation"
plays such as Stranae Interlude and Lmm M f 1 ! Journey Into
Mlaht. 0*Kelll showed himself to be mi unyielding experi*
©enter
We tew iioud the outstanding treads in O'lffelll's
experimentation., In an effort to investigate life £tm the
viewpoint of the working of sun's minds, tie found that the
scenic dietortion of reality represented, better than any
other vehicle* the desires and cravings that drive human
being®
psychic motivations to the teagiraation of Ills audience t
0 *HeiU many times p«smiitted viewers to see the disturbances
of nature as the tortured characters in the play wist see
them. When Jonas In Jhe gmperor Jones remember® the figures
from his guilty past, the audience is allowed to see the *
aanlfes tatlons of tills sonl •searching on the stajta • in la.
Hairy Ap®. the mental distortion in Tank's desire to seek
*Jotm Mason Browa, WxmmtiM. Fersonae <Keif York, 1963), p. 52#
82
ravanga for Mlldrad'a anobbary Is pictured by tha distorted
iornuadla|» at tha climactic point of bit March* In
theatra circlas that particular uaa of scaaic dasign mat
t@sm«d ©xpresiioeisia. But to O'lfaill this use wmmlf
rapraaantad tha baat way to portray tha "raality" of Iif a
in its complatanass t from inception la the aind to maturity
in deliberate action.
In this endaavor to acconpllah hia purpose la play*
writing, O'Neill helped to establish in American theatre
a for® of scenic design and stagecraft aaw in concapt.
Whethar to dalibarataly intended to do this or vfoether it
m s a byproduct of M a genius ia difficult to say. Havar*
thalass, he began a trend ia the theatre that m m the
admiration of many and avast the distaste of a fair* Xt ia
parhapa unfortunate that many remember 0 'Neill laaa for what
he had to aay than hem ha said it. But it ia tmdanij&la
that much of hia fame la attributed to hia scenic imagination*
For axaapla, Coralik aakas tha following; obaarvaticxu
Tha caaa of Sugana O'lfaill, graataat of tha American Symbolist playwrights, ia aven sore striking, all tba taora ainca 0 'Nsill has baaa an innovator scanlcally as nail as in hia writinga.*
%oralik, Hay Theatres for Old, p. 230.
$3
As we have already pointed out, O'fteill gained world-
wide recognition through the first trend in his expert*
mentat:ion--expretiaioaisr1i. As he continued in hi® asperi*
wents* however, hie eagerness for discovery use replaced
by a more personal eagerness •
0 'Neill auit have shared scne of the guilt that tnraed
hie mother into a dope addict, M a father into a nerve*
shattered hit of nothingness, and his brother into en
alcoholic whoremonger. His third wife, Carlotta Monterey,
witnessed 0'Heill's transformation free an energetic play
wright to a tortured penitent. Many nights he would shot
himself in his study and write until he could no longer
think. He confessed to her that he would not rest until
he had put on paper the true clrcissstances of his life as
a youth. On their twelfth anniversary he dedicated the
newly completed script of Learn Say's Journey Into Siaht to
Carlotta* with the inscription readings 'these twelve years.
Beloved On, have baa a Journey Into light—awl love."'
In Hit own wade, O'Beill wrote feoafc SSlh. Journey lfi£°
6Gelb, O'BeiU. P«wei».
'carpenter, Eugene O'HetlX. p. 42.
m
Nittht "with deep pit; and understanding and forgiveness
for Ail the four haunted Tyrones."®
Long 0a?'* Journey Into HiKht represented the ultimate
penance for ®'Belli« With i f he satisfied the obligation
lis fa i t to the memory of his parent# and brother. Bat
this piay was long la evolving. Many tlaas 0 *llslll had
triad to {Hit his f i l i a l faallitgs into his plays, hut of tan
tiay ruined hit priaary Mtivt, or did not fit tha vthielc
of presentation ha was using at the time. For aaaapla, All
Cod*! Chillun Sot Wlnii ia fillad with eoiaparisons to James
and Ella 0'Maill* The tr ia ls Jim and Ella have in recon-
ciling their differences mm very l ike the trial* of recon-
ciliation ancountared by O'llaill's ®othar and fatbsr* Bacauaa
of this dasira to write the truth about Ms tartarad youth,
0'He ill axparfcsantad with a variaty of stylas until ironically
ha found suecass with raaliam—th© style ha mist abhorrad and
tha style ha had usad in hit aarly cr.rsar*
I t would ha facetious to suppose that 0bill's past
was rasponsibla for his total desire to expetismnt* 0 'Raill
rebelled a l l his Ufa against theatrical comrasreiailata and
8 H M » S P. 77.
85;
its choking •timet on thMtrleii progress* Horn ia ortaat
than guilt complexes » O'BeiUfs past provided love for the
theatre and a desire to rid it of probatory elements.
Specifically, o'Etlll1! contributions in the area of
stagecraft have bean manifested through hi* close utili-
sation of the,.iieifBtagecra£t* With such expressionistic
effects as tom-toms, silhouetted figures, and a moving
Jungle in The Emperor Jones. lie proved himself a master
of experimentation, Ihe Hairy Aoe sustained this achieve-
ment. Both plays raade extensive use of Ihe then new forms
of production* With |he Great God Brown and Laaarus Laughed*
O'Neill reintroduced the mask for dramatic effect v though the
technique proved to he generally unsuccessful when placed
in a modem environment* In the last analysis, it m m
seen thet when the new stagecraft becomes the only basis of
presentation, as in Jtgg, amoeror Jones and The Hairv Aoe.
it is seen at ita best. Haver again did the new stagecraft
become the complete basis for production in O'lCeillU plays*
la web pUf M &11 figilt sauam S2£ Best. M«roo MUIIom.
Satia I t e £isa. P9v*rp*ffli »»<=«•»« gi«ctr» 0'n.iu
reverted only occasionally to new stagecraft techniques in
@6
the form of actor® suggesting the visual background, stylised
settingss sound effects, and symbolic costuming. As we have
previously pointed out, the important point about these
latter plays is that they kept before the public the use
of the new stagecraft and permitted it to become eventually
a much used theatrical device.
We have already pointed out in previous chapters that
many times O'Neill's scenic experiments were unsuccessful
and gave evidence of hi® faults and limitations. However,
what have seemed the faults of O'Neill'a work to a minority
of critics have also seemed O'Neill's greatest virtues to
a majority. Much of his greatness lies in his appeal
beyond the boundaries of his own country to varied
audiences of nany other nations. Repudiating the conventions
admired by traditional American audiences, O'Neill did not
descend to their level, but appealed to other audiences. To
truly find the crux of O'Neill's contributions to the theatre,
one must do two things —realize his courage to experiment
despite narrow-minded objection to anything new by the com-
mercial theatre, and most important, realize the universality
87
of his messages aft found in M s plays. Frederic Carpenter
m ; |I eooMinlAg Ocelli** significance as an Innovators
Q'Mil's reputation we# baaed upon his love of e*peri»i®nt$ lis kept hit public In a ittt* of axcitaaent emir hi# restless and clevi2>r eiaijeriflNSintlngi $ Bis flllUM as a dflsatiit May also be identified with the general failure of expressionism Itself« In its effort to objectify inner states of salad and ©motion, it forced the dramatist to devote too vmch of M a atten-tion, energy, and imagination to pm&leais of the new stage conventions, to the neglect of the essential concerns of any literature,9
It was not until after hie death that 0 'Neil! once again
mis recognised as he had been in the twenties* Since that
tiM several of his plays ham enjoyed major revivals.
Strangely enough most of these more notable revivale were of
plays that were generally unsuccessful la their original
productions* Possibly the reasona for their production is
the attest to rectify unjust criticism of then "when they
ware first produced during a time of antagonism and mis*
understanding•
Since 0'Meill has become famous throughout the world, a
listing of every revival would be difficult* A close look at
^Carpenter, Buisene ®'Belli. p. M X
38
selected revivals of the play® m have previously mentioned,
hamvnXf will provide * view of 0bill's present reputation,
especially in the area of hi* scenic suggestions.
Several of 0 *llaill*s plays have been r©~produeed in
unusual manners. Anna Christie and Ah. Wilderness! (his
only cheerful flay) haw been Ktada into Musicals, A hit
of ecnaercialisatioo tahich would surely cause mm
pain if he vera alive* The Emperor 2 m m has been dona
as a modern dance piece, vhich would no doubt cause further
Most revivals, however, have been serious attempts
to do Justice to 0 'Weill *s original intentions.
Alexander Tairov, one of Russia's anti'Naturalist
dramatists, made excellent and well-received revivals of
The Hairy Ape (1926), Desire Under Klmg <192$, and All
Cod** Chilian Got WiMi (1929), putting thsm in constructivist
settings.11
In 1937 Mottmln& Becomes Electra MI revived at the
Westminster theatre in London* Seenieally the production
DMS well-handled, the adverse criticise of the production
10Alis» Churchill, "Portrait of a Stofoel Prise If inner as a Bum," Bsoulre. XLVIt (June, 1937), 99.
11Cor«llk, gss Th—tre« fog 22A. P- 3W.
89
m m irtiole closely reseofeled die original crlticlan of the
first production of the piay. ffe® critics disliked the
attwuspfc to introduce a chorus and considered tlie writing
of Ada® Brandt's death melodramatic. Generally the erltlea
agreed that the play *»s tfiorow tly a "dramatist*« play"
«ad too difficult to present soenically.12 Perhaps thla
accounts for the fact that no revival of major iarpartane©
has been nade of this particular play,
Fordfeaat University revived %mmt&9 Lamped in 1948.
Because of Its daring to do the play at all, the collage
theatr© received critical attention, the production design
IMS strikingly different from £it@ original, A staple unit
•at w employed, and instead of an architectural fonset»
projections were used to suggest locale. Critics almost
unanimously dismissed th© scenic design as a fair attempt.
In all, the production w m received unfavorably and the play
m m called "Helll's biggest leoon."*3
Arts Monthly, Mil (February, 1938)* 101*1©?,
i3Kappo Phelan, Coagnomreal* 50UVIII (April 30, 194$), 674.
90'
1956 saw tte beginning of the return to interest fen
0 *Heill and four of his plays m m given significant pro-
ductions to that yaiir. Two » n first Braadtmy productions,
o n % s a Musical ackjitatioxi, and one m e a revival* In
that year, Attna Christie mm mad© Into a musical entitled
H«n Cirl In Tom. It had a nodetately successful run,
though it did not gain outstanding attention. Both Long.
Sazlc. Joumev Ma. SUM. «nd k Moon tSS. Sfi. Wlgbonottao w»re
presented for the first timtt with the lattar receiving the
Pulitzer Prlae. (&, Hoon for the Misbegotten h i produced in
1947 hut closed before coming to New York.) Eh* Iceman C«aeth
w s received and because * superb success with a phenomenal
run of 565 performances. As proof of the startling public
return to interest in Stafeti® O'Heill, Carlotta
0*Heill,s Midm, received, sen average of five thousand dollars
a meek in royalties in 1956. Brooks Atkinson e*pl*in®d the
revival of interest in O'Neill:
Tin reason for tba current O'Heill ®e» vtval and its enosnoua success, as far as 1 can sec it* is that tlie mood of the fisblie ia Just right. We are living in an introspective # "sick
H period and
ma» fcM wrifctaa of "•Ittai i i of t te Mtii," tifii iato l t i » hi «•*•* ttfut
Loac P i f 1 ! Jameiiw Into Hight w*» revived twice with
nota[worthy £*©<tt*«tl<x*** 11* Abbey Thaatre |»r©dtte#ii the
play tint in 1959. It mm m wmm§B*l th*t t te
•MMi&t&unm fe# JMWiUtt It *»•<« OXllV V®Hff U t t f i
Tim ctx&pany iollmmd M e loi t ly *« f O i i M t the dimeeietti
O'Neill wc&>%* In that pU|« Crifciea p v i undying to
ffm {toisjMB&y lilNiifji lm£ 0—yynlSy y1#y t
flu* isarfelciiliue #t4fef# ttfratms
Oddly atiough •.•«&« "Abbay gtyln" yswwwi n wump ywrfoat v® h id* for
AfWi iftbcadi S9Bp|#S' #**
A JWMW? **HW* AlHoy fhfHItW in HOtnafcOSif "Pfw—Jtj
frtUlf £ ypwfCfififit jpavlval of fet*# play. Tins i«t ^aitgn
'WS* f (M&fel> It* pgodh*lttiUKl WIMft 8®S lA Ht*f» flCllffltUftril '
f t t *|. * Wit jS'-Mb, afe '' ii/ fitr iw, ^ ;ift'#ii% m '•%# S jKt Jto' • Jfk
IW PP 4RS1 | p0VI*VMr IpWIFiypiPPPW lf wm m Pll jjJWP w WSSyPSS-w
set time without «*lln* In tM.* *»»»* ywyfrnw micii «wwi
t/WMggtb\&4 HnroI4 UtotiNNttlf ^Tff181! ©irlti,© fsv BNut Ycwrtt
t i n , wrote?
Mwrauk, XUX (An* 17, US7). 65-67,
*%•» Task t l w i . B«pt—fr«r 30, 1M2» S«c. 3, p. 9.
9&
It tiwold not be astonishing tb»t O'liUl'i flMit play titaiai its power to move art audience as deeply •s It purged its author.**
h significant revival of |h£ Great Cod Brown uss made
to 1959 ct the New fork Coronet Theatre (now renamed the
Eugene 0 'Heill Theatre#) The production retained the use
of «*S1ES as 0 'Keill had suggested originally* Critics found
that the purpose of Hie masks m « still not clear and harmed
th® overall preaentation,17 Harold Clumsa, one of the more
prominent crities of the production* wrote;
Xt is no longer of first importance that 0 'Weill used *»sks in this play, a device considered highly "experi-mental" in 1926 when the play was originally presented. What is luportant is tt»@ play's theme and the anguish 0*Heill imbued it Willi,,
Stuart Vaughun** direction is much more stylised than the original production directed by Robert Edmond Jones.*®
Xa 1963 The Circle in the S<piara Theatre revived Desire
Under the. Hal* **• Taubman, noting that the play was by no
16New York Times. June 27, 1963, Sac. 5, p. 6.
i7Xheophilua Lewie, "The Great God Brown,11 Aaserlca. CII (October 31, If St), 139*140.
18Barold Cl«»aat "Theatre," nation, . .Qjaxm (October 34* 1959) 259-260,
means "old*£i«hl(»id,w made the following observation
about this particular production:
The extensive open playing space, sparingly M t by David 8»yit con- ' veys the impression of greater XMllt| than do decors with an abundance of f a n d details.19
In review, we cm mm frcaa evidence which these re-
vivals present that those plays which failed in their
original presentation repeated the failure when revived.
To assume thst 0*Me ill's compulsive seal for experimentation,
and thereby the new stagecraft, no* responsible for this
would be assigning a great deal. Optimistically m cm
assume tbit Eugene O'Metll played a «aJor purt in the (
|»<f e et'W'Mnwt of tW# ocv stagacraft •
Today we have a great 4 *1 fro® a»«ypanp-i
of Eugene O'Heill* Meny of the pxdblmm which confronted
him mm no longer problems in the modern theatre. It would
be overs itapl ifying iaatter» to say that had he not attempted
experimentation we might still be struggling
many barriers in theai&ri&al presentation * It would be more
advantageous to bypass O'Heiil** problems, failures, and
*%ew York Times. January 11, 1963, Sec. 5* p« 6.
mi
shortcomings, and mm that this man brought American theatre
beyond the restriction* of a representtational drama and
opened the door t® a f m r , deeper, and broader m u of
theatrical production. His work has given £0 posterity
• better stage which provide# an ample tool for the pre*
Mat»tion» of Mm fi idea# through the dramatic art.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Books
A»$*try* Charles Echwrd, Landmarks |n Moton Ififi&i Ibsen to Ionasco, Boston, Houghton Hifflte Company, 1963.
Botfly Gsomm11* Hgt Coree of the Mistee&Pfcten, Bur York, MoGr*«r»Hlll Book Coapany, Inc., 1959.
Istmii Jaim Mason, Dramatis Eersoiiae. Sew York, The Viking Fviii, 1963*
Carpenter, frwterie Ives, Emseae 0'Belli. Hew York, Tweyne Publishers, 1964*
Carter, Ifcmtley, Theatre o£ H§& Reinhardt. New York, Benjamin BlowTtnc., 1914.
Cheney, Sheldon, ggg. Movement J& Theatre, Hew York, M# Kennerley, 1914*
« The Art Theatre. 8<w York, A. A. »»#:£, 1915*
. The Tbaatn, Hew York, Longpsans, Gram, & Co., i5sn
CtalR, Edwud Gordon, Hawtt gg| tSSBU L o n d < m. lift H t W B Bookshop. 1921,
Deutch, Helen, U a Province town. Hew York, Farrar & Rinehart, Inn•} 1932•
Brutal • Edwin A.. lb. Hauntad Horoaa of a i i m O W l l . Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University t*®»i, 1953.
Gassner, John, Eugene O'lteill* Minneapolis, University of Minnesota r m i , 1965.
, Treasttrv gf Tha Theatre. Sew York, Simon & Shuster,1951
95
Celb, Arthur and Birbira, O'tfeill, Heir York, Harper & Brothers, If62*
Gorellk, Mordecai, ffiBSEE U t 2M» »«• York, 1* p. ' Duttoa & Co«» 1902*
Hartnoll, Phyllis, Hg> M M $&$L StaSBU London, Oxford Itaiversity Pmi, 1951*
Hughes, Glenn, 4 History f| the American theatre* Mm York, Thittn Arts, Inc*, 1925*
Hacgowan, Kenneth, J|g© Theatre of Tomorrow. New York, Semi M i Liverlghfc, 1921#
Macgowan, Kenneth md William Mainit*, The Living Stase. Englewood Cliffs, Hew Jersey, Prentiee-iliuInc., 1955.
Miller, Jordan Y*, Eugene O'Neill and the American Critic* London, Archon Books, 1962*
(o'Neill, Eugene, Sine flays, edited by Joseph Hood Krutch, New York, Eandoni House, 1952*
Phelp*. VUli** Lyon, TwmtUth Croturr IbwtCT. H«r Tozfc, Ylse Macmillan Go», 1920*
Roberta, Verm Howry, g& Stage, New York, Harper & low, 1962,
Sswsll, John Ives, 4 Hlatory of Western Art. New York, Holt, Rlnehart and Vistton, 19617
Shipley, Joseph, gg, toyae O'Neill* Seattle, University Washington look Store, 1928.
Articles
XLXX (June 17, 1937), 65*68*
Blackburn, Clara, "Continental Influence# on Eugene 0,lleill,s Kxpressioeistic DSSMS," American Literature. XIII (Nay, 1941), 109-133.
Clurnan, Harold, "Thaatra," Nation. CLXXXIX (October 24, It St), 299-260 •
Churchill, Allan, "Portrait of a Nobel Friit Winner as * Bw*,M Esquire. XLVII (June, 1957), 98-101.
Lewie, ftoeopliiltiS, "The Great God Brown," Aasiirica. CXI (October 31, 1959), 139-140.
Nullatt, M»t)r B», ,l£t» Extraordinary Story of Sugene O'Heill,"
American mmzixrn* XCIV (November, 1921), 34*
fhelan, Kappo, Cocbhkii^I, XLVIII (April 30, 1948), 674.
Theatre Arts Monthly. XXII (February, 1938), 101*107.
Unpublished Materials Black* Robert, "Robert Mrfmmtd Jones," unpublished doctoral
divert*tiara, Department of Drana, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, 1955.
newspapers
New York Tlwes. Septenber 30, 1962.
Hew York January 11, 1963.
New York #*
1 H June 27, 1963.
97