AURA RESOURCES INC.

Experience + Good Properties + Sensible Jurisdictions

SUCCESS!

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTSThis presentation may contain forward looking statements that are made as of the date hereof and are based on current expectations, forecasts and assumptions which involve risks and uncertainties associated with our business including the uncertainty as to whether further exploration will result in the target(s) being delineated as a mineral resource, capital expenditures, operating costs, mineral resources, recovery rates, grades and prices, estimated goals, expansion and growth of the business and operations, the private placement financing activities of the Company, plans and references to the Company’s future successes with its business and the economic environment in which the business operates. All such statements are made pursuant to the ‘safe harbour’ provisions of, and are intended to be forward-looking statements under, applicable Canadian securities legislation. Any statements contained herein that are statements of historical facts may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. By their nature, forward-looking statements require us to make assumptions and are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties. We caution readers of this presentation not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements as a number of factors could cause actual results or conditions to differ materially from current expectations. Please refer to the risks set forth in the Company’s most recent annual MD&A and the Company’s continuous disclosure documents that can be found on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Aura Resources Inc. does not intend, and disclaims any obligation, except as required by law, to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Aura Resources Inc.Capital Structure

(As of Feb. 28, 2019)

• Symbol: AUU-TSX-V

• Listed on the TSX Venture Exchange

• Outstanding 27,490,128

• Warrants 5,423,943

• Options 1,100,000

• Compensation options

and warrants 254,524

• Fully Diluted 34,268,594

Directors & Officers Technical Consultant

Robert Johansing, President, CEO & Director Marco Montecinos

Professional Geologist, M.Sc., QP Consulting Geologist

Dr. J.M. Franklin, Independent Director

Professional Geologist, PhD., P. Geo.

Bill Boberg, Independent Director

Professional Geologist, M.Sc., P. Geo.

John McNeice, Chief Financial Officer

Chartered Accountant, B. Comm.

Aura’s Projects

• Greyhound, Nunavut: Active JV with Agnico Eagle→43.5% ownership→ participation in Technical Committee→ Au, Ag & base metal exploration

• Higo Blanco, Oaxaca, Mexico

→ To be explored by Minaurum Gold Inc. in 2019

• Gold Chain project, Western Arizona

→ 2018 acquisition: a known gold deposit deserving a fresh look and modern technology

• Jefferson Canyon, Nye County, Nevada

→ LOI signed; Definitive Agreement pending Due Diligence

→ Known Au-Ag deposit in great jurisdiction; deserves another look!

Greyhound Project, Nunavut

Initial project claims were staked to cover historical silverprospects assaying from 1,480 to 3,080 g/t Ag. Subsequent rocksamples range as high as 28.2 g/t Au and 5,380 g/t Ag. The projectis now a joint venture with Agnico Eagle as operator. Auracurrently holds a 43.5% interest in the Greyhound project.

Greyhound Project: Newly Identified VMS Target

1: Target massive sulfide zone: IP Anomalies define suspect Zn-Cu Volcanogenic massive sulfide deposit: Drill Target2: Footwall alteration systems Na, Eu depleted3: Basal synvolcanic intrusion: Heat source driving metal release and discharge

1

2

3

The Greyhound area geology is typical of most VMS districts in the Canadian Shield. It contains:• A laterally extensive subvolcanic intrusion [3]

that provided both heat and possible gold to the system

• A classic footwall alteration assemblage, as identified by Na and Eu depletion [2]

• A series of an echelon conductors that may represent stacked massive sulfide lenses (1).

• Evidence of hanging wall capping sediments and Eu enriched volcanic strata [4]

4

Cross section ofclassic VMS system

3

Massive Sulfide Boulder AnalysesSamples were taken from glacially transported individual boulders or fragments, aligned in a dry stream bed adjacent to the all-weather road to Meadowbank Mine.Samples were selected randomly to represent the range of sulfide-bearing boulders.

Large (50cm-1m) boulders in stream channel

Cu % Zn % Pb % Au ppm Ag ppm

1 0.439 13.4 0.100 1.1 9.63

2 9.26 18.48 0.100 0.356 166

3 2.63 7.79 0.089 0.141 64.3

4 4.08 0.896 0.081 0.118 105

5 0.313 13.05 0.127 0.117 18.7

6 0.724 11.5 0.106 0.099 23.4

1,5,6

2,3

4

Based on the analytical data, these may represent various parts of a massive sulfide occurrence:• Samples 1,5 and 6 are distinctly Zn rich, and may represent the

upper part of a VMS occurrence• Samples 2 and 3 contain elevated Zn and Cu, and possible

represent the lower core part of a VMS massive sulfide mound• Sample 4 is Cu-rich but with less n than the others, and may

represent the lower, stringer zone part of a VMS occurrence• The low Pb content may indicate a Noranda-type, deep water

VMS environment

Cross section of a high-T, deep water (>2000m) VMS deposit: Typical of Noranda, Matagami lake and Flin Flon districts, Canada

Greyhound Project: Great Expectations for 2019

“The highly conductive zones are prime targets for VMS discovery, and a drill program is being planned to test them. Drilling will commence as

soon as weather conditions will permit. In addition, we expect to proceed with exploration activities focussed on the many gold discoveries in other parts of the property, including the targets

previously outlined in our December press release”.

Dr. James M. Franklin

Higo Blanco Project - Background• The Higo Blanco project is a large, high-level epithermal vein and replacement

system emplaced in limestone and volcanic rocks;

• Robust, but poorly delineated, silver mineralization and broad zones of low-gradegold (0.5 to 1.0 g/t) mineralization that are mutually exclusive but spatiallyproximal;

• Chargeability highs coincident with identified gold – arsenic anomalies; and

• Drilling in 2009 and 2011 encountered significant mineralization:

HBET03 – 34.2m @ 211.7 g/t Ag HBET02 – 20.35m @ 0.625 g/t Au

HBET16 – 36.6m @ 292.3 g/t Ag HBET11 – 20.85m @ 0.6 g/t Au

HBET23 – 24.6m @ 186.92 g/t Ag HBET27 – 25.3m @ 0.796 g/t Au

• In January 2019, an 80% interest in the project was vended to Minaurum Gold who will compile the historical data, initiate communication and programs with

the host community and design a drilling program in 2019.

Gold Chain Project, Mohave Co., Arizona

• A large amount of historical data (1980s) has been compiled fromseveral phases of reverse circulation, air track and minor core drillingwhich have identified broad zones of low-grade gold mineralization,i.e. 0.5 to 1.6 g/t Au.

• Exploration drilling has focused on three areas, Roadside mine, BlackDyke and Gold Chain (see figure) which contain extensive exposuresof mineralized quartz-calcite stockwork and breccia emerging above abroad pediment of Recent gravels.

• Analysis of Figure 1 suggests that gold mineralization may be focusedat the intersection of a regional detachment-type structure withsteeper, northeast-trending normal faults and rhyolite dikes.

Gold Chain Hill~50m quartz-Fe oxide breccia

Gold Chain ProjectSignificant Drill Intercepts

Gold Chain ZoneDH 80263 59.7m @ 0.283 g/t AuDH 80267 18.4m @ 1.42 g/t AuDH 80272 16.8m @ 0.51 g/t Au

Black Dyke Zone DH RSM-2 23m @ 0.71 g/t Au

DH RSM-3 16.8m @ 0.91 g/t AuDH RSM-15 19.9m @ 0.65 g/t Au

Roadside ZoneDH RSM-1b 27.6m @ 0.82 g/t Au

DH AT-15a 9.2m @ 2.24 g/t AuDH RM88-8 39.8m @ 0.65 g/t Au

Jefferson Canyon Project, Nye Co., Nevada

• Contains a large volcanic-hosted epithermal Au-Ag system;

• Same age as the nearby Round Mountain deposit (9kmwest), which is a world-class low-sulfidation (LS) epithermaldeposit (>15M oz. Au);

• Both are hosted in felsic ash-flow tuffs along the margins ofcalderas and both contain a strong northwest-trendingstructural control to veins; and

• Extensive Au-Ag mineralization over 1.4 X 1.8 km withcoincident QSP alteration and supporting geophysics.

Significant Drill ResultsFrom 1969 thru 1986, 134 holes (10 core) delineated a 1.5 x .3km corridor of Au-Ag mineralization. Two zones are partially defined:

Central Ag-rich Zone A: 47.2m @ 78.8 g/t Ag,

42.7m @ 54.5 g/t Ag,

48.8m @ 80.7 g/t Ag, and

27.4m @ 0.88 g/t Au.

- remains open to northwest

Peripheral Au-rich Zone B: 19.8m @ 0.99 g/t Au,

25.9m @ 8.63 g/t Au,

44.2m @ 1.13 g/t Au,

32m @ 0.85 g/t Au; and

56.4m @ 0.63 g/t Au.

- open along strike & at depth.

Jefferson Canyon Project Geology

Simplified geologic map showing caldera margin at JCP fault, areas of Au-Ag mineralization and associated alteration. Note Section A-A’.

Section A-A’: Showing Au-Ag mineralization in wedge of QSP-altered tuffs between JCP fault and rhyolite plug. Here the JCP fault is the caldera margin.

2000m

1500m

3000m

2500m

Aura Resources Inc. – 2019 Funding

Greyhound Project: Agnico Eagle

Higo Blanco Project: Minaurum Gold

Gold Chain Project: CDN$150,000

Jefferson Canyon Project: CDN$175,000

Aura Resources Corporate: CDN$175,000

Aura Resources Seeks to Raise CDN$500,000

Contact UsCorporate Office:

PO Box 279 Manotick Ontario K4M 1A3

www.aurasilver.com

Robert J. Johansing – President & CEO

T 805-455-4775; rjohansing@gmail.com

John McNeice – CFO

T 613-692-7704; jmcneice@bellnet.com

Marco Montecinos – Consultant

T 775-771-0241; tigreninc@aol.com