atmospheric particulate matter: chemical composition and basics of concentration estimation
DESCRIPTION
Atmospheric Particulate Matter: Chemical Composition and Basics of Concentration Estimation. Mike Bergin, Ted Russell, Jim Mullholland, Sangil Lee. CEE 6319: Air Module. Overview. Week 1 (April 8) Lecture (Bergin) Background (effects, extent of problem, PM characteristics, etc.) - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Atmospheric Particulate Matter: Atmospheric Particulate Matter: Chemical Composition and Basics of Chemical Composition and Basics of
Concentration EstimationConcentration Estimation
Mike Bergin, Ted Russell, Jim Mullholland, Sangil Mike Bergin, Ted Russell, Jim Mullholland, Sangil LeeLee
CEE 6319: Air ModuleCEE 6319: Air Module
Overview
• Week 1 (April 8)– Lecture (Bergin)
• Background (effects, extent of problem, PM characteristics, etc.)• An overview of filter based sampling
• Week 2 (April 11 -15)– Lecture (Bergin)
• Nut and bolts of atmospheric particulate measurements• Detection limit determination
– Lab (Lee)• Begin sampling ambient particulate matter on EST roof
• Week 3 (April 17-22)– Lab (Lee)
• Finish sampling• Laboratory analyses (mass, ions, carbon, select elements)
• Week 4 (April 29)• Lab due on last day of classes
P
Potential Gas/Particle Interactions at a Filter Surface
PM2.5 Mass from Teflon Filter Gravimetry
Equilibration of Teflon filter samples in Class 1000 Clean Room
[PM] < 1000/scf, T = 21 +-0.5 oC, RH = 33 +-3 %
Mettler Toledo MT5 Electronic Micro-Balance
Exp. DL = 1.2 +-0.02 g; P = +- 0.4 % @ 1 g; A = +-0.001 % {1-500 mg}
PM2.5 NAAQS will also impact many smaller cities
Monitors at which the 1999 annual average [PM2.5] exceeds (yellow and red) the 15 g/m3 annual average PM2.5 NAAQS.
Annual Average PM2.5 in Urban Areas, 2002
PM2.5 Concentrations Across the PRD
•Concentrations at all sites above annual U.S NAAQS
•Organic carbon and sulfate are the dominant species
•Guangzhou appears to be major source of PM
EC2.1%
OC9.5%
Unidentif ied20%
Trace Metals1.4%
Crustal Material51%
NH4+
0.4%Cl-
0.4%
SO42-
3.4%
NO3-
0.8%
CO32-
11.1%
SO42-
17%NO3
-
5.8%
Cl-
0.6%
NH4+
6.2%
Unidentif ied-12.9%
Crustal Material28.7%
Trace Metals0.7%
OC41%
EC13%
Aerosol Chemical Composition Measured in Yulin, China
Dust
Anthropogenic Pollution
Emissions/AQ Trends: Primary PM2.5
AQ
Emissions
Sources (2001)
Potential Risks and Effects• Heart (arrhythmias, attacks)
• Respiratory (asthma, bronchitis)
• Among elderly and young• Vegetation (ecosystem)
• Buildings, Materials• Visibility
Other (Inorganic) Secondary PM Formation
Secondary formation is a function of many factors including: concentrations of precursors, other gaseous reactive species (e.g., O3, OH), atmospheric conditions, and cloud or fog droplet interactions.
Gas-to-particle conversion (oxidation)
SO2(g) HOSO3 H2SO4 + 2NH3 (NH4)2SO4
NOx(g) HNO3 + NH3 NH4NO3
Heterogeneous reactions
(R7)
R6)(
R5)(
)4R()(
2422
123
233
322
2222
SOOSO
SOHHSO
HSOHOHSO
OHSOOHgSO
Emissions/AQ Trends: SO2
AQ
Emissions Sources (2001)
Potential Risks and Effects• Breathing impairment
• Respiratory, cardiovascular {PM}• Precursor for PM
•Acidification (soils, waters)• Corrosion (bldgs, monuments)
• Visibility
SO2 SO4= in Greater Atlanta for July 2001
34.4
34.2
34.0
33.8
33.6
33.4
33.2
33.0
32.8
32.6
32.4
-85.0 -84.5 -84.0 -83.5 -83.0 -82.5 -82.0
Atlanta
FAQS ASACA sites significant point sources point sources w/ CO:NOx > 1
20x20 km
Griffin
Macon
Augusta
Columbus
N
E
S
W6 12
SO2*3 (ppbv)
SO4= (µgm-3)
WS*2 (m/s)
WD (%)
N
E
S
W6 12
SO2*2 (ppbv)
WS*2 (m/s)
WD (%)
Emissions/AQ Trends: CO
AQ
Emissions
Sources (2001)
Potential Risks and Effects
• Blood-O2 deficiency
• Cardiovascular (angina pectoris)• Visual, neurological impairment
• Role in P(O3) via HOx cycle (slow)
Emissions/AQ Trends: NOx (NO+NO2)
AQ
Emissions
Sources (2001)
Potential Risks and Effects• Airway, lung function
• Respiratory illness, infection• Precursor for O3 and PM
•Acid deposition (nutrient loss)• Eutrophication (algae bloom)
• Visibility
Measuring ions using ion chromatography
An example Chromatogram (Anions)
An example Chromatogram (Cations)
Measuring Elemental and Organic Carbon (EC/OC)
The Sunset Lab Instrument
Thermal Evolution Thermalgram
Estimating Mass Closure
To estimate the mass concentration based on chemical composition:
MT = ∑ions + ∑elements + ∑crustal + ∑carbon
= ∑ions measured +
∑Al*1.9 (Al2O3) + Si*2.1 (SiO2) +Fe*1.4 (Fe2O3)
+ Elemental Carbon (EC) +Organic Carbon (OC)*1.4
Mass Closure = ΔM = Measured Mass- Estimated Mass
Uncertainty Estimation
Root Sum Square Method:
For Example Function:
X=ABm/Cn
2C
2B
2Ax
CnU
BmU
AU
XU
A Simple Example
Mass Concentration = Mass on Filter (ΔM) / Air Volume (V)
M = ΔM / V
ΔM = 100 ug ± 10 ug; V = 1.0 m3 ± 0.1 m3
%140.11.0
10010
MU 22m