atlas ofindirapublishinghouse.com/files/atlas_of_phytoseiidae_of_the_world... · atlas of...
TRANSCRIPT
ATLAS OF PHYTOSEIIDAE
OF THE WORLD (ACARI: MESOSTIGMATA)
Vikram Prasad, M.D., Ph.D.
2013
INDIRA PUBLISHING HOUSE Publisher of books in agricultural, biological, medical and veterinary sciences
P.O. Box 250456, West Bloomfield, MI 48325-0456, USA E-mail: [email protected]; www.indirapublishinghouse.com
All rights reserved. Except for brief quotation in a review or reference, this book or parts thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher.
First printing: March 2013 Published by: Indira Publishing House P.O. Box 250456, West Bloomfield, MI 48325-0456, USA Phone: (248) 661-2529 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.indirapublishinghouse.com
Printed in the USA ISBN: 0-930337-31-X Library of Congress Control Number: 2013902148
2
DEDICATION
THIS BOOK IS LOVINGLY DEDICATED
For their constant support, to:
My grandparents Mr. Shiva Jatan Shah and Mrs. Manwa Devi; my parents Mr. Udai Narain Ram and Mrs. Yashoda Devi; my wife Indira Prasad; my daughter Nilima Prasad Chand, her husband Sunil Chand, and their daughter Sunita Chand; my son Ravi Vikram Prasad, his wife Savita Prasad, and their daughters Kavita Prasad and Anita Prasad; and my son Ravindra Vikram Prasad and his wife Mary Dimercurio Prasad.
A special dedication also to:
Dr. Harold A. Denmark, Gainesville, Florida (USA) and Dr. James A. McMurtry, Sunriver, Oregon (USA) for their enormous help to me with this book.
3
ABSTRACT
The family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) is comprised of 2,800 species known to occur throughout the world with the exception of Antarctica. They are primarily predatory mites, many of which play an important role as biological control agents of many plant feeding mites and tiny insects. Several species of these are being mass cultured and utilized globally for this purpose by the biological control industries. Many new species are described and already known species recollected and redescribed every year from all over the world. Research work on different aspects of the Phytoseiidae is expected to increase several folds over next few decades. Thus, correct identification of these important mites will be essential. Atlases, checklists and catalogs are some important taxonomic reference books required to aid in such identification works.
This atlas follows the classification system of Chant and McMurtry (2007) and includes over 1,000 figures of different species of Phytoseiidae. As the concept of some of the genera keeps changing, for the sake of convenience of the readers, these species are arranged in alphabetical order from A to Z showing important morphological structures and current system of setal nomenclature. Errors or problems in published figures of species are pointed out. It was noted that almost 8-10% published figures had errors or problems of one kind or another which are discussed for 192 species in this book. The species reported as synonyms in literature, even if controversial, are included as they were identified originally since some may or may not be synonyms. This book complements other books, “Checklist of Phytoseiidae of the World” (Prasad, 2012) and “Phytoseiidae and Otopheidomenidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) of the World: A Self Study Guide” (Prasad, 2011). Other recent books on Phytoseiidae as “Illustrated Keys and Diagnoses for the Genera and Subgenera of the Phytoseiidae of the World (Acari: Mesostigmata)” (Chant and McMurtry, 2007), “Phytoseiidae of Greece and Cyprus (Acari: Mesostigmata)” (Papadoulis, Emmanouel and Kapaxidi, 2009), and “Phytoseiidae of North America and Hawaii (Acari: Mesostigmata)” (Denmark and Evans, 2011) are invaluable books for anyone wishing to pursue research on taxonomy of phytoseiid mites and should be included among the reference books.
4
CONTENTS
Title - 1 Publisher’s data - 2 Dedication - 3 Abstract - 4 Contents - 5 Introduction - 7 - Some important papers on Phytoseiidae and closely related families - 8 - Idiosomal chaetotaxy - 9 - Relationships of Phytoseiidae with nearest relatives in different life stages - 14 - Difficulties in identification of some dorsal idiosomal setae - 16 - Difficulties in identification of some ventral idiosomal setae - 19 - Other structures and characteristics - 20 - Problems with some published figures - 22 - Why so many genera today - 66 - New species based on pores, solenostomes, number of denticles, type of spermathecae and spermatodactyls - 70 - Our handicaps in Phytoseiidae - 71 - Variation in species - 71 - Species synonyms - 71 - Synonymy problems - 72 - Misidentification of species - 74 - Old versus new setal nomenclature of idiosoma - 75 - Where are the large collections of mites and reprints of Donald Chant - 75 - How to improve problems in publications of Phytoseiidae: Some recommendations - 75 - How to use this book - 80 - Confession - 81 Classification of Phytoseiidae - 82 Current genera of Phytoseiidae - 85 Controversial genera of Phytoseiidae - 87 New genera of Phytoseiidae - 88 Atlas (species, beginning with): A - 89 B - 177 C - 229 D - 329 E - 370 F - 410 G - 446 H - 476 I - 522 J - 554 K - 570 L - 603 M- 662 N - 762 O - 817 P - 842 Q - 937 R - 943 S - 985 T - 1076
5
U - 1131 V - 1140 W- 1160 Y - 1177 Z - 1185
Species list of figures - 1188 Acknowledgements - 1220References - 1221 Index - 1293
6
INTRODUCTION Species of the family Phytoseiidae are considered to have evolved from Gamasina or Mesostigmata with holotrichous setation with a single postanal seta and 66 pairs of dorsal and ventral idiosomal setae (Lindquist and Evans, 1965) which have lost many of these setae during different evolutionary adaptations to various environmental conditions. Of these 66 pairs, 23 pairs of setae have been suppressed and 43 pairs are known to occur in Phytoseiidae but no known phytoseiid species has this full complement (Chant, 1993c; Chant and McMurtry, 1994, 2007). Of these 43 pairs of idiosomal setae, only 22 pairs (dorsal = 12 pairs and ventral = 10 pairs) occur as fixed setae and 21 pairs (dorsal = 16 pairs and ventral = 5 pairs) occur as variable setae on all phytoseiids (Chant and McMurtry, 2007, Figs. 1, 2). The most setose phytoseiid species that is known is Australiseiulus angophorae (Schicha), 1981a (subfamily Typhlodrominae), with 38 pairs of dorsal and ventral setae on the female idiosoma, and the most hypotrichous species is Afroseiulus robertsi (Baker), 1990 (subfamily Amblyseiinae), with 25 pairs of dorsal and ventral setae on the female idiosoma.
The evolution in the Phytoseiidae has been marked by simplification of many characteristics and suppression of many setae on the idiosoma and legs, but also by modification to the tectum and corniculi, and reduction in the hypostomal dentition and idiosomal sclerotization. This setal suppression has resulted in extensive paedomorphosis (retention of juvenile or larval traits into later life including the adult) leading to loss or suppression of adult ancestral setal forms and adapting to more hypotrichous phytoseiids now that resemble the setal complement of immature holotrichous blattisociines (Chant, 1993c). This suppression of idiosomal setae appears to have been discontinuous over a period of time (Chant, 1993a).
Mites of the family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) are predators of other mites and certain kinds of insects and nematodes. They are well known as biological control agents of plant feeding mites and some insects. Several species, for this reason, are being commercially utilized for this purpose in several countries. Among these, the well-known predators are: Amblydromalus limonicus (Garman and McGregor), 1956 (Amblyseiinae), Amblyseius andersoni (Chant), 1957c (Amblyseiinae), Amblyseius swirskii Athias-Henriot, 1962 (Amblyseiinae), Galendromus occidentalis (Nesbitt), 1951 (Typhlodrominae), Iphiseius degenerans (Berlese), 1889 (Amblyseiinae), Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor), 1954 (Amblyseiinae), Neoseiulus cucumeris (Oudemans), 1930b (Amblyseiinae), Neoseiulus fallacis (Garman), 1948 (Amblyseiinae), Phytoseiulus longipes Evans, 1958c (Amblyseiinae), Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot, 1957a (Amblyseiinae) and Transeius montdorensis (Schicha), 1957b (Amblyseiinae).
At present, about 2800 phytoseiid mite species are known in the world. New species, especially from tropical and neotropical countries, are being described at a rate of about 40 per year (Prasad, 2012). It is expected that hundreds of new species will be discovered over the next several decades. It is also expected that several phytoseiid species, other than those listed above, would be utilized in the biological control. Thus, knowledge of these mites, taxonomic or in biological control and applied research, would be expanding gradually requiring knowledge of trained acarologists in various lines of research, and for correct identification of these mites.
The researchers of the plant and soil associated mites require various tools for the correct identification of the phytoseiid mites. For example, descriptions, figures, keys, and information on the distribution, hosts, habitat, etc. Some of this information may be available in comprehensive taxonomic publications such as Atlases, Bibliographies, Catalogs, Checklists, Monographs, etc. Each of these provides only certain specific information and does not replace the importance of the other. Thus, various reference books as tools are necessary to achieve the goal of identification and writing about these mites.
Other than bibliographical works on Phytoseiidae by Kostiainen and Hoy (1996), most comprehensive works on these mites over the last decade have been by Moraes, McMurtry, Denmark and Campos (2004); Chant and McMurtry (2007); Papadoulis, Emmanouel and Kapaxidi (2009); Denmark and Evans (2011) and Prasad (2012). Of these, only the “Catalog” by Moraes, McMurtry, Denmark and Campos (2004) and “Checklist” by Prasad (2012) include all phytoseiid species known in the world but do not include figures. Atlases on insects and mites, by tradition, are important reference books that include illustrations of published species which are very useful not only in the correct identification of species but also to compare the closely related species which may turn out to be synonym or misidentification. As such works require years of dedicated work, except for “Atlas of the Swedish water mites” by Lundblad (1962) and “Illustrations of the mites and ticks of Japan” edited by Shôzô Ehara (1980), no Atlas of mites, especially on Phytoseiidae of the world has been published.
7
J2
J5Z5
s4
S2
S4
S5
r3
R1
j1
PE > j1
ST2
ST3
ST4
ST5
ZV1
MP2 ZV2
JV1
Vesicular
JV2
SgeIV
StiIV
StIV
L - Shaped
JV4
JV3
JV 1
JV2 ZV2
JV4
ST1
j3
j6
j4 z2
z4z5
Z1
Z4
F
A
E
G B
D
C
acaridophagus, Phytoscutus (Collyer), 1964b – Acarologia 38 (3), 1997, p 225 (after Yoshida-Shaul and Chant, 1997) [A-D, female: A. dorsal shield, B. ventral shields, C. spermatheca, D. leg IV, E. peritremal shield; F-G, male: F. spermatodactyl, G. ventrianal shield] - AMBLYSEIINAE.
96
A
E F
B
G
D
accessus, Neoseiulus (Ueckermann and Loots), 1988 – IJA 32 (3), 2006, p 243 (after Zannou, Moraes, Ueckermann, Oliveira, Yaninek and Hanna, 2006) [A-E, female: A. dorsal shield, B. ventral shields, C. chelic-era, D. spermatheca, E. leg IV; F-G, male: F. spermatodactyl, G. ventrianal shield] - AMBLYSEIINAE.
C
J2
J5 Z5
s4
S2
S4
S5
r3
R1
j1 PE j1
ST2
ST3
ST4
ST5
ZV1 MP1
MP2 ZV2 ZV3
JV1
Vesicular
JV2
FDCH = 3
StIV
SgeIV
Beaked
PD +
JV4
JV5
JV1
JV2
JV5
ZV2
ST1 j3
j5
j6
j4
z2
z4
z5
Z1
Z4
MDCH = 2
97
J2
J5Z5
s4
s6
S2
S4
S5
r3
R1
j1
PE j1
ST3
ST4?
ST2
ST5
ZV1
MP1
MP2 ZV2
ZV3 JV1 FundibularJV2
FDCH = 5-6
PD +
StIV
JV4
JV3
JV5
ST1
j3
j5
j6
j4 z2
z4
z3
z5
Z4
MDCH = 2
alba, Amblydromella Denmark and Evans, 2011 – Denmark and Ev-ans (2011), p 311 (after Denmark and Evans, 2011) [female: A. dorsum, B. ventral shields, C. spermatheca, D. peritremal shield, E. chelicera] - TYPHLODROMINAE.
B
A
E
C
D
112
A B
D E
C
canadensis, Phytoseius Chant, 1965b – Papadoulis, Emmanouel and Kapaxidi (2009), p 107 (after Papadoulis, Emmanouel and Kapaxidi, 2009) [female: A. dorsal shield, B. ventral shields, C. chelicera, D. spermathecae, E. leg IV] - PHYTOSEIINAE.
J5Z5
Z4
s4
s6
r3
j1
PE j1
Fundibular
j3
j5
j6
j4
z2
z3
z4
z5
ST2
ST3
ST4 ST5
ZV1 MP2
ZV2 ZV3
JV1 JV2
JV5
ST1
FDCH = 3
PD +
MDCH = 1
StIVStiIV
SgeIV
238
Z{zamoranus}, {Swirskiseius} Denmark and Evans – 66, 1185{zuluagai}, {Iphiseiodes} Denmark and Muma – 66, 1186{zwoelferi}, {Neoseiulus} (Dosse) – 1187
*****
1319
BOOKS OF THE AUTHOR
Atlas of Phytoseiidae of the World (Acari: Mesostigmata), in color, by V. Prasad, 2013, 1319 pp, (hard cover).
Checklist of Phytoseiidae of the World (Acari: Mesostigmata), by V. Prasad, 2012, 1063 pp, (hard cover).
Phytoseiidae and Otopheidomenidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) of the World: A Self Study guide, in color, by V. Prasad, 2011, 208 pp, (hard cover).
Memories of Acarology in Color (Part 1. Honoring Acarologists), in color, by V. Prasad, 2003, 200 pp, (hard cover).
Mites: A Bibliography (1926-1966), by V. Prasad, 1988, 230 pp, (hard cover).
A Decade of Acarology, by V. Prasad, 1987, 183 pp, (hard cover).
History of Acarology, V. Prasad (Ed.), 1982, 472 pp, (hard cover).
The Taxonomy of Water Mite Larvae, by V. Prasad and D. R. Cook, 1972, 326 pp, (hard cover).
A Catalogue of Mites of India, by V. Prasad, 1974, 320 pp, (hard cover).
For current offerings and prices of books available from Indira Publishing House in acarology, entomology and zoology, visit our website at http://www.indirapublishinghouse.com/
1320