assessing the diffusion of nanotechnology in turkey
TRANSCRIPT
Assessing the diffusion of nanotechnology in Turkey: A social
network analysis approach
Hamid DarvishLecturer Cankaya University
PhD Candidate.Hacettepe UniversityDepartment of Infortmation Management
Ankara, Turkey
Out Line Introdcution Research questions Data and methods Finding and discussion Conclusion
What is nanotechnology
Mehta stated (2002) that nanoscience is about creation and manipulation of information and nanotechnology is an application which is based on nanoscience principles.
The term “nano” refers to particles as small as molecules in a size of 10-9 of a meter.
Why nanotechnology European Union Scientific Framework
(EUSF) has invested tremendously in nanotechnology since 2000
The Turkish government also has adopted a new approach by becoming part of the EUSF and has invested heavily in research and development.
Turkey included nanotechnology in its national 2023 Technology Foresight Program (Saritaş et al., 2007).
Nanotechnology continues United Nations defined nanotechnology
as one of the important recent breakthroughs in science
Positive impact on developed and poor countries For example
Water purification in poor countries Develop better computer devices
Knowledge( nanotechnology) diffusion
Rogers (2003) pioneered and studied innovation diffusion in several fields. He defines the diffusion of an innovation as "the process by which an innovation is communicated through certain channels over time among the members of a social system.“
Invisible colleges (Co-authorship) Bilkent and Hacettepe Universities
Why social network analysis
De Solla Price (1965) argued in his paper published in Science magazine that patterns of bibliometric data in scientific communication indicate the scientific development in different research domains.
Citation analysis alone does not suffice to explain the structure of the network of collaboration among scientists.
Social network analysis continues
Betweenness centrality Burt (2004) coined the term “structural
hole” Chen et al. (2009) stated that scientific
discovery comes with a group of specialist, who attend, read and cite same body of literature and attends same conference
Co-word analysis (Callon et al., 1983) Collaboration (Moody 2004)
Research questions
Who is the productive author in each social structure network?
To what extend do scientists in each network structure co-operate in scientific activities?
What are the research topics studied in each network structure?
Data and methods
Retrieved 167 and 230 bibliographic data for Hacettepe and Bilkent Universities during 2000-2010.
Ucinet (Borgatti, Everett, & Freeman, 2002) is used to calculate the statistical data: betweenness, degree centrality.
CiteSpace, developed by Dr. Chen is used to map the development of co-authorship of scientists.
Results and discussion
Figure 1. Network of co-authorship in Bilkent University including its subject categories
Data and discussion continues
Figure 2. Network of co-authorship in Hacettepe University including its subject categories
Data and discussion continues
Figure 3. Network of co-word frequency in Bilkent University
Data and discussion continues
Figure 4. Network of co-word frequency in Hacettepe University
Conclusion Mapped the structural and temporal
evolution Identified the productive authors Nodes having higher betweenness
centrality boost the diffusion process Co-word frequency analysis No shared researched activities
between two university
Future works Include all universities in Turkey Compare the results from my research
with results from WoS analysis tools