assessing organizational context for implementation research gregory a. aarons, ph.d. university of...

28
Assessing Organizational Assessing Organizational Context for Implementation Context for Implementation Research Research Gregory A. Aarons, Ph.D. Gregory A. Aarons, Ph.D. University of California, San Diego University of California, San Diego Department of Psychiatry Department of Psychiatry Presented at the Administration for Children and Families Conference: Improving Improving Implementation Research Methods for Behavioral Implementation Research Methods for Behavioral and Social Science. Silver Spring, MD: and Social Science. Silver Spring, MD: September 20-21, 2010

Upload: warren-cuthbert-ellis

Post on 23-Dec-2015

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Assessing Organizational Context for Implementation Research Gregory A. Aarons, Ph.D. University of California, San Diego Department of Psychiatry Improving

Assessing Organizational Context for Assessing Organizational Context for Implementation ResearchImplementation Research

Gregory A. Aarons, Ph.D.Gregory A. Aarons, Ph.D.

University of California, San DiegoUniversity of California, San Diego

Department of PsychiatryDepartment of Psychiatry

Presented at the Administration for Children and Families Conference: Improving Implementation Research Methods for Improving Implementation Research Methods for Behavioral and Social Science. Silver Spring, MD: Behavioral and Social Science. Silver Spring, MD: September 20-21, 2010

Page 2: Assessing Organizational Context for Implementation Research Gregory A. Aarons, Ph.D. University of California, San Diego Department of Psychiatry Improving

Overarching QuestionsOverarching Questions

What aspects of organizational context may What aspects of organizational context may be implicated in implementation be implicated in implementation effectiveness? effectiveness?

How do we better understand the process and How do we better understand the process and outcomes of implementation efforts?  outcomes of implementation efforts?  

Examples Examples – QuantitativeQuantitative– QualitativeQualitative– Mixed-MethodsMixed-Methods

Page 3: Assessing Organizational Context for Implementation Research Gregory A. Aarons, Ph.D. University of California, San Diego Department of Psychiatry Improving

Organizational Context of Social ServicesOrganizational Context of Social Services

Source: Glisson & Schoenwald (2005)Glisson & Schoenwald (2005)

Page 4: Assessing Organizational Context for Implementation Research Gregory A. Aarons, Ph.D. University of California, San Diego Department of Psychiatry Improving

Levels of ChangeLevels of Change

Larger System/ Environment

Organization

Group / Team

Individual

Reimbursement, legal, and regulatory policies are key

Structure and strategy are key

Cooperation, coordination, & shared knowledge are key

Knowledge, skill, and expertise are key

Source: Shortell, (2004) Medical Care Research and Review

Four Levels of Change for Assessing Performance Improvement

Assumptions about Change

Page 5: Assessing Organizational Context for Implementation Research Gregory A. Aarons, Ph.D. University of California, San Diego Department of Psychiatry Improving

Conceptual Model of Conceptual Model of Implementation ResearchImplementation Research

InterventionInterventionStrategiesStrategies

EvidenceEvidence BasedBased

PracticesPractices

ImplementationImplementationStrategiesStrategies

Systems Systems

EnvironmentEnvironment

OrganizationalOrganizational

Group/LearningGroup/Learning

SupervisionSupervision

ProvidersProviders

ConsumersConsumers

Implementation Implementation OutcomesOutcomes

FeasibilityFeasibility

FidelityFidelity

ReachReach

AcceptabilityAcceptability

SustainabilitySustainability

UptakeUptake

CostsCosts

Service Service OutcomesOutcomes

Efficiency Efficiency

SafetySafety

EffectivenessEffectiveness

EquityEquity

Patient-CenteredPatient-Centered

TimelinessTimeliness

Client Client OutcomesOutcomes

SymptomsSymptoms

Functioning Functioning

SatisfactionSatisfaction

Quality of LifeQuality of Life

OutcomesOutcomes

Implementation Research MethodsImplementation Research Methods

Source: Proctor, Landsverk, Aarons, Chambers, Glisson, Mittman (2009)Source: Proctor, Landsverk, Aarons, Chambers, Glisson, Mittman (2009)

*IOM Standards of Care*IOM Standards of Care

Page 6: Assessing Organizational Context for Implementation Research Gregory A. Aarons, Ph.D. University of California, San Diego Department of Psychiatry Improving

Conceptual Model of Implementation Conceptual Model of Implementation Phases and Context LevelsPhases and Context Levels

Source: Aarons, Hurlburt, & Horwitz,(In Review)

Page 7: Assessing Organizational Context for Implementation Research Gregory A. Aarons, Ph.D. University of California, San Diego Department of Psychiatry Improving

Organizational Culture and Climate

Organizational culture and climate are related but distinct constructs– Aarons & Sawitzky, 2006; Denison, 1996; Schneider, Ehrhart, &

Macey, 2010

32 definitions of organizational climate and 54 32 definitions of organizational climate and 54 definitions of organizational culture with some definitions of organizational culture with some overlap between these constructsoverlap between these constructs– Verbeke, Volgering, Hessels 1998Verbeke, Volgering, Hessels 1998

Page 8: Assessing Organizational Context for Implementation Research Gregory A. Aarons, Ph.D. University of California, San Diego Department of Psychiatry Improving

Organizational Culture

“…“…shared basic assumptions… considered valid and, the shared basic assumptions… considered valid and, the correct way to perceive, think, and feel in” an organization correct way to perceive, think, and feel in” an organization – Schein, 2004Schein, 2004

Behavioral norms and expectations for the ways in which Behavioral norms and expectations for the ways in which people behave in an organizationpeople behave in an organization– Cooke & Rousseau, 1988Cooke & Rousseau, 1988

““the way things are done here…”the way things are done here…”

Organizations with cultures that are more supportive of Organizations with cultures that are more supportive of employees and that are adaptable to changes in the employees and that are adaptable to changes in the environment are more effective environment are more effective – (Kotter & Heskett, 1992; Wilderom, glunk, & Maslowski, 2000)(Kotter & Heskett, 1992; Wilderom, glunk, & Maslowski, 2000)

Page 9: Assessing Organizational Context for Implementation Research Gregory A. Aarons, Ph.D. University of California, San Diego Department of Psychiatry Improving

Competing Values Framework

Source: Kalliath, Bluedorn, & Gillespie (1998) Ed & Psych MeasurementSource: Kalliath, Bluedorn, & Gillespie (1998) Ed & Psych Measurement

Page 10: Assessing Organizational Context for Implementation Research Gregory A. Aarons, Ph.D. University of California, San Diego Department of Psychiatry Improving

Organizational Culture Inventory

Source: human synergistics 1987-2007Source: human synergistics 1987-2007

Page 11: Assessing Organizational Context for Implementation Research Gregory A. Aarons, Ph.D. University of California, San Diego Department of Psychiatry Improving

Organizational Climate

Employees’ perceptions of the policies, practices, and procedures and the kinds of behaviors that get rewarded, supported, and expected in a setting– Schneider, 1990

Employee’s perceptions of the psychological impact Employee’s perceptions of the psychological impact of the work environment on his or her own well-of the work environment on his or her own well-being and functioning in the organization being and functioning in the organization – Glisson et al., 2007; Glisson and James, 2002Glisson et al., 2007; Glisson and James, 2002

Focused or strategic climates – e.g., Diversity climate, Service climate, Safety climate

Kuenzi & Schminke, 2009; Schneider et al., 2010

Page 12: Assessing Organizational Context for Implementation Research Gregory A. Aarons, Ph.D. University of California, San Diego Department of Psychiatry Improving

Organizational Social ContextOrganizational Social Context

Source: Glisson et al. 2007Source: Glisson et al. 2007Fig. 1 Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of organizational social context (OSC) Fig. 1 Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of organizational social context (OSC)

Page 13: Assessing Organizational Context for Implementation Research Gregory A. Aarons, Ph.D. University of California, San Diego Department of Psychiatry Improving

Quantitative AnalysesQuantitative Analyses

Page 14: Assessing Organizational Context for Implementation Research Gregory A. Aarons, Ph.D. University of California, San Diego Department of Psychiatry Improving

Relationship of Organizational Culture and Climate Relationship of Organizational Culture and Climate with Attitudes Toward Adopting EBPwith Attitudes Toward Adopting EBP

Source: Aarons & Sawitzky (2006) Source: Aarons & Sawitzky (2006)

Page 15: Assessing Organizational Context for Implementation Research Gregory A. Aarons, Ph.D. University of California, San Diego Department of Psychiatry Improving

Organizational Climate Partial Mediation of the Effect of Organizational Climate Partial Mediation of the Effect of Organizational Culture on Work Attitudes and TurnoverOrganizational Culture on Work Attitudes and Turnover

Source: Aarons & Sawitzky (2006) Source: Aarons & Sawitzky (2006)

Page 16: Assessing Organizational Context for Implementation Research Gregory A. Aarons, Ph.D. University of California, San Diego Department of Psychiatry Improving

Figure 1. Multigroup Clustered Path Analysis: Association of Transformational Leadership and Leader-Figure 1. Multigroup Clustered Path Analysis: Association of Transformational Leadership and Leader-Member Exchange with Team Climate for Innovation and Team Climate for Innovation with Staff Attitudes Member Exchange with Team Climate for Innovation and Team Climate for Innovation with Staff Attitudes Toward Innovation Adoption During Innovation Implementation compared to Services as Usual. Note: Toward Innovation Adoption During Innovation Implementation compared to Services as Usual. Note: N=140; Teams Implementing the SafeCare (n=85) / Teams Providing Services as Usual (n=55); N=140; Teams Implementing the SafeCare (n=85) / Teams Providing Services as Usual (n=55);

χχ22 (4)=1.105; (4)=1.105; pp=.894; CFI=1.000, TLI=1.037, RMSEA=0.000, SRMR=0.013; *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001=.894; CFI=1.000, TLI=1.037, RMSEA=0.000, SRMR=0.013; *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001

Leader MemberLeader MemberExchangeExchange

Attitudes Toward Attitudes Toward Adopting EBPAdopting EBP

TransformationalTransformationalLeadershipLeadership

.74**.74**/-.11/-.11

Team Climate for Team Climate for InnovationInnovation

-.09-.09/.89***/.89***

.29**.29**/.22/.22

.84***.84***/.91***/.91***

Source: Aarons & Sommerfeld (In Review) Source: Aarons & Sommerfeld (In Review)

Page 17: Assessing Organizational Context for Implementation Research Gregory A. Aarons, Ph.D. University of California, San Diego Department of Psychiatry Improving

Figure 3. Path model of partial mediation effects of agency type on organizational support for evidence-Figure 3. Path model of partial mediation effects of agency type on organizational support for evidence-based practice and attitudes toward evidence-based practice, effect of organizational support for based practice and attitudes toward evidence-based practice, effect of organizational support for evidence-based practice on provider attitudes toward evidence-based practice, and effect of organizational evidence-based practice on provider attitudes toward evidence-based practice, and effect of organizational support for evidence-based practice on provider use of evidence-based practice. support for evidence-based practice on provider use of evidence-based practice. N = 170; AIC = 2437.127, SBIC = 2436.638; *p<0.05, **p<0.01 (one-tailed)N = 170; AIC = 2437.127, SBIC = 2436.638; *p<0.05, **p<0.01 (one-tailed)

EBP UseEBP UseOrganizational Organizational

Support for Support for EBPEBP

AttitudesAttitudesTowardToward

EBPEBP

Agency TypeAgency Type

0.15*0.15* 0.16*0.16*

0.18*0.18*

0.09ns0.09ns

0.11**0.11**

Source: Aarons, Sommerfeld, & Walrath-Greene (2009)Source: Aarons, Sommerfeld, & Walrath-Greene (2009)

Page 18: Assessing Organizational Context for Implementation Research Gregory A. Aarons, Ph.D. University of California, San Diego Department of Psychiatry Improving

Qualitative AnalysesQualitative Analyses

Page 19: Assessing Organizational Context for Implementation Research Gregory A. Aarons, Ph.D. University of California, San Diego Department of Psychiatry Improving

Implementation of a Computerized Implementation of a Computerized HIV Clinical Reminder HIV Clinical Reminder (PIs, Goetz, Asch; VA QUERI)(PIs, Goetz, Asch; VA QUERI)

Screening rates of HIV in VA very lowScreening rates of HIV in VA very low

Question: What type of service improvement can improve Question: What type of service improvement can improve HIV testing with appropriate individualsHIV testing with appropriate individuals

Develop software to identify high-risk vets and remind Develop software to identify high-risk vets and remind providers to recommend HIV testproviders to recommend HIV test

– SoftwareSoftwareAssesses EMRAssesses EMRInitiates reminder – regardless of service (no wrong door)Initiates reminder – regardless of service (no wrong door)

Ethnographic process evaluationEthnographic process evaluation

Part of QUERI (Quality Enhancement Research Initiative)Part of QUERI (Quality Enhancement Research Initiative)

Sobo , Bowman, Aarons, Asch, Gifford (2008) Human Organization

Page 20: Assessing Organizational Context for Implementation Research Gregory A. Aarons, Ph.D. University of California, San Diego Department of Psychiatry Improving

Implementation of a Computerized Implementation of a Computerized HIV Clinical ReminderHIV Clinical Reminder

Sobo , Bowman, Aarons, Asch, Gifford (2008) Human Organization

Page 21: Assessing Organizational Context for Implementation Research Gregory A. Aarons, Ph.D. University of California, San Diego Department of Psychiatry Improving

Results:Results:Implementation of a Computerized Implementation of a Computerized

HIV Clinical Reminder HIV Clinical Reminder

Key organizational sub-culture differences in stakeholder Key organizational sub-culture differences in stakeholder agendas impacted implementation agendas impacted implementation – (e.g., physician, nursing, information technology, laboratory)(e.g., physician, nursing, information technology, laboratory)

Emergence of strategic communication processes that, Emergence of strategic communication processes that, despite their immediate utility, sometimes undermined despite their immediate utility, sometimes undermined progress and threatened long term relationshipsprogress and threatened long term relationships– focus on the local focus on the local – information reconfigurationsinformation reconfigurations– partiality partiality

Sobo , Bowman, Aarons, Asch, Gifford (2008) Human Organization

Page 22: Assessing Organizational Context for Implementation Research Gregory A. Aarons, Ph.D. University of California, San Diego Department of Psychiatry Improving

Mixed-MethodsMixed-MethodsCombines qualitative and quantitative approachesCombines qualitative and quantitative approaches

CollaborationCollaboration between quantitative and qualitative between quantitative and qualitative researchers during theresearchers during the study design phasestudy design phase

Open acknowledgement of the philosophicalOpen acknowledgement of the philosophical approaches brought to the study by various team approaches brought to the study by various team membersmembers

Shared willingnessShared willingness to negotiate emerging problemsto negotiate emerging problems

Should include mixing of design, analyses, and resultsShould include mixing of design, analyses, and results

Source: Willging et al., (2007)(2007)

Page 23: Assessing Organizational Context for Implementation Research Gregory A. Aarons, Ph.D. University of California, San Diego Department of Psychiatry Improving

Mixed-Methods Research Offers Several Mixed-Methods Research Offers Several Advantages over Single-Method ApproachesAdvantages over Single-Method Approaches

Combine the qualitative and quantitative Combine the qualitative and quantitative approaches into the research methodology of a approaches into the research methodology of a single study or multi-phased studysingle study or multi-phased study

Simultaneously answer confirmatory and Simultaneously answer confirmatory and exploratory questions, and therefore verify and exploratory questions, and therefore verify and generate theory in the same studygenerate theory in the same study– Teddlie & Tashakkori, 2003Teddlie & Tashakkori, 2003

Page 24: Assessing Organizational Context for Implementation Research Gregory A. Aarons, Ph.D. University of California, San Diego Department of Psychiatry Improving

Mixed-Methods Study of Statewide Mixed-Methods Study of Statewide EBP Implementation EBP Implementation (NIMH PI: Aarons)(NIMH PI: Aarons)

Implementation of SafeCare® in Oklahoma’s Implementation of SafeCare® in Oklahoma’s Statewide Children’s Services SystemStatewide Children’s Services System

Combines exploratory and confirmatory Combines exploratory and confirmatory approachesapproaches

Mixed MethodsMixed Methods– Equal quantitative and qualitative componentsEqual quantitative and qualitative components

Longitudinal at organization/team levelLongitudinal at organization/team level

Requires collaboration and ongoing relationship Requires collaboration and ongoing relationship building and maintenancebuilding and maintenance

Page 25: Assessing Organizational Context for Implementation Research Gregory A. Aarons, Ph.D. University of California, San Diego Department of Psychiatry Improving

Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier Survival Function Estimates (Retention Probability) by Study Condition. Note: SC/M = participating in SafeCare and fidelity monitoring; SC/Non = participating in SafeCare, but not fidelity monitoring; SAU/M = services as usual and receiving fidelity monitoring; and SAU/Non = services as usual and not receiving fidelity monitoring. N=153.

Source: Aarons, Sommerfeld, et al (2009), Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Annualized Turnover by Condition

Consultation

Yes No

Yes

SafeCare®

No

14.9% 33.4%

41.5% 37.6%

Implementation Outcomes Implementation Outcomes Effect of EBP Implementation on Staff RetentionEffect of EBP Implementation on Staff Retention

Page 26: Assessing Organizational Context for Implementation Research Gregory A. Aarons, Ph.D. University of California, San Diego Department of Psychiatry Improving

CCM perspective on EBP implementation CCM perspective on EBP implementation and turnoverand turnover

Having to learn new skills Having to learn new skills and dissatisfaction with SC and dissatisfaction with SC or with being monitored or with being monitored may have contributed to may have contributed to some of the older CCMs to some of the older CCMs to quit their jobs.quit their jobs.

Learning skills like SC were Learning skills like SC were motivations to stay with motivations to stay with current employers.current employers.

““And the CCM’s that I see having a problem And the CCM’s that I see having a problem adapting; actually the ones that have the adapting; actually the ones that have the trouble adapting were excellent case trouble adapting were excellent case managers, but they have a style that’s pretty managers, but they have a style that’s pretty free flowing and they just aren’t adjusting as free flowing and they just aren’t adjusting as well as you would like to see them.”well as you would like to see them.”

““I mean if they don’t all succeed and I never, I mean if they don’t all succeed and I never, ever am going to expect that they all ever am going to expect that they all succeed, because you have those that are succeed, because you have those that are not just to do it and work at it successfully. not just to do it and work at it successfully. But when you see the percentage of them But when you see the percentage of them that do succeed is so much higher than those that do succeed is so much higher than those that don’t, it really makes it worth it. And that don’t, it really makes it worth it. And that’s the whole goal for me with my families that’s the whole goal for me with my families is for them to succeed.”is for them to succeed.”

THEMETHEME QUOTEQUOTE

Page 27: Assessing Organizational Context for Implementation Research Gregory A. Aarons, Ph.D. University of California, San Diego Department of Psychiatry Improving

Agency/program director perspective on EBP Agency/program director perspective on EBP implementation and turnoverimplementation and turnover

Implementation of EBPs Implementation of EBPs helps to recruit and retain helps to recruit and retain new staff.new staff.

Learning new skills like SC Learning new skills like SC might inspire CCMs to seek might inspire CCMs to seek higher paying jobs higher paying jobs elsewhere.elsewhere.

“…“…its like any kind of change within, its like any kind of change within, you know, staff. There’s gonna be you know, staff. There’s gonna be some resistance. But I feel like, well, some resistance. But I feel like, well, as evidenced from our turnover. We as evidenced from our turnover. We have very little turnover here. And, you have very little turnover here. And, you know, if they weren’t happy, they know, if they weren’t happy, they wouldn’t stay.”wouldn’t stay.”

““It is helping recruit and retain good It is helping recruit and retain good staff to recognize that, wow, [agency] is staff to recognize that, wow, [agency] is the place where you can go and get the place where you can go and get trained in the latest evidence-based trained in the latest evidence-based practices and have good support, good practices and have good support, good supervision, and that sort of is part of supervision, and that sort of is part of our goal is to be recognized for that”our goal is to be recognized for that”

THEMETHEME QUOTEQUOTE

Page 28: Assessing Organizational Context for Implementation Research Gregory A. Aarons, Ph.D. University of California, San Diego Department of Psychiatry Improving

ContactContact

e-maile-mail

[email protected]

web:

http://psychiatry.ucsd.edu/faculty/gaarons.html