assess pci
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/29/2019 Assess Pci
1/17
Early identification of infants at risk for
developmental disabilities
Laurel M. Bear, MDa,b,*aMedical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
b
Child Development Center, Childrens Hospital of Wisconsin, PO Box 1997 MS#744, Milwaukee,WI 53201, USA
Early recognition of infants at risk for development disability is important.
The early identification of a developmental delay is a challenge to all physicians,
however. It is difficult to differentiate between infants who are lagging behind in
skill acquisition but will achieve the usual developmental milestones and infants
who are truly deviating from the expected pattern. Identifying children in the first
year of life provides the opportunity for early referral for interventional services
and diagnosis. The physician can supply factual information and devise a realisticapproach for the care of those conditions and then counsel parents regarding
possible outcomes for their child. Children with chronic medical conditions and
children growing up with precarious social and environmental circumstances are
at risk for developmental delay. Early diagnosis of at-risk infants is possible once
a thorough history is obtained, a complete physical examination is performed,
and an assessment of the functional developmental level is secured.
Perinatal history
A thorough perinatal history offers vital information that, when analyzed,
provides important clues to possible risk factors that may have a later impact on a
childs functioning. Not only should gestational age, birth weight, and Apgar
scores be obtained but also pertinent pregnancy information should be reviewed.
Most importantly, was there prenatal care before the birth of the child? Early
support of a pregnancy leads to earlier maternal and fetal intervention and
improved fetal outcome. By definition, a high-risk pregnancy places the mother
or infant at higher risk for medical complications. Some maternal circumstances
0031-3955/04/$ see front matterD 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.pcl.2004.01.015
* Child Development Center, Childrens Hospital of Wisconsin, PO Box 1997 MS#744, Mil-
waukee, WI 53201.
E-mail address: [email protected]
Pediatr Clin N Am 51 (2004) 685701
-
7/29/2019 Assess Pci
2/17
have an impact on the medical and developmental functioning of the infant,
including inadequate or excessive maternal weight gain, diabetes, lupus, seizure
disorder, and other chronic diseases. Increasing maternal age has a direct cor-relation regarding the increased prevalence of chromosomal anomalies. Some
of the entities that have a direct influence on infant outcome include placental
insufficiency, infection, preterm birth, multiple gestation, fetal demise in a mul-
tiple pregnancy, illegal drug use, prescription medication use, and alcohol and
tobacco use. Cocaine-exposed infants have been found to have significant
cognitive deficits and a doubling of the rate of developmental delay during the
first 2 years of life, although contradictory studies have suggested that there was
no direct effect on cognitive outcome but indirect effects were mediated through
the home environment [13].Some factors affect delivery and have an impact on a neonates well-being.
The length of laboreither prolonged or precipitousis important to note.
Friedman ***characterized normal labor by studying normal nulliparous and
multiparous women during routine labor. From these studies he developed the
concept of a dilatation curve. Labor was divided into a latent phase, active phase,
and second stage (Fig. 1) [4]. There are marked individual variations in the length
of labor; however, the average length of the first stage of labor can range from
7 hours in a nulliparous woman to 4 hours in a parous woman. The second or
active stage usually lasts from 50 minutes in a nulliparous woman to 20 minutesin a multiparous woman. A short or long second stage of labor can have an affect
on fetal well-being. Cesarean section itself does not place a baby at high risk;
Fig. 1. Composite of the average dilitation curve for nulliparous labor.
L.M. Bear / Pediatr Clin N Am 51 (2004) 685701686
-
7/29/2019 Assess Pci
3/17
however, the reason for the cesarean section may. Were fetal heart rate problems,
infection, or a failure to progress the reason for the surgical delivery? An op-
erative delivery may lead to transient tachypnea of the newborn. This entitywas first described in 1966 by Avery ***and was believed to be caused by the
delayed absorption of fetal lung fluid [5]. Passage of heavy, thick meconium
before or at the time of delivery may indicate fetal distress, and it places the in-
fant at higher risk for the development of meconium aspiration syndrome. Me-
conium is found in 8% to 20% of deliveries and is usually light (meconium
staining). Passage of meconium is a poor predictor of later neurologic problems.
In the large National Perinatal Collaborative study, less than 0.5% of infants with
a birth weight more than 2500 g and meconium staining had neurologic problems
[6]. Fetal hypoxia, as measured directly by scalp pH or indirectly by fetal heartrate tracing, sets the stage for possible neonatal complications but is not a specific
predictor of later problems.
Neonatal considerations
The Apgar score, devised by the anesthesiologist Dr. Virginia Apgar in
1952, was one of the first objective, clinical measures used to assess a newborns
well-being. It consists of five observable measures: heart rate, respiratory effort,color, muscle tone, and response to noxious stimuli. The Apgar score was de-
veloped as a tool to assess the condition of an infant at birth. A low Apgar score
is not synonymous with asphyxia. Asphyxia implies fetal hypercarbia and hy-
poxemia that can lead to metabolic acidosis. Medications, congenital anomalies,
gestational age, and acute events all may have an impact on the Apgar score. The
1-minute Apgar score indicates if ongoing intervention is needed. A low Apgar
score correlates poorly with later development of cerebral palsy. Nelson and
Ellenberg ****found that 55% of children with cerebral palsy had Apgar scores
of 7 to 10 at 1 minute, and 73% of children with cerebral palsy scored 7 to 10 at5 minutes. Of the children who had Apgar scores of 0 to 3 at 10 minutes or later
and survived, 80% were free of major handicap at early school age [710].
It is important to assess accurately a newborn infant by determining its
gestational age and recording the growth parameters. The newborns growth
parameters reflect the in utero environment. Newborns are classified according to
their birth weight as small for gestational age (less than the tenth percentile),
average, or large for gestational age (more than the ninetieth percentile). The
National Center for Health Statistics revised the individual growth charts in 2000.
These charts incorporated newer data from five national health examinationsurveys. There are some minor differences in the percentile lines. Most of the
differences are found in the charts for infants and there are differences at the outer
percentiles (ie, smallest and largest children) [11].
Maternal diabetes and maternal obesity are well-known predisposing factors in
the development of large-for-gestational-age infants. Other factors that are
associated with macrosomic infants include (1) large size of parents, particularly
L.M. Bear / Pediatr Clin N Am 51 (2004) 685701 687
-
7/29/2019 Assess Pci
4/17
obesity in the mother, (2) multiparity, (3) maternal age, (4) prolonged gestation,
(5) male fetus, (6) previous large infant, and (7) race and ethnicity [1215].
The incidence of congenital anomalies and intellectual and developmental de-lay is statistically more common in preterm and term infants of high birth weight.
Obstetric complications continue to occur in this population, including birth
trauma, intrauterine growth restriction, and intrapartum asphyxia. The infant of a
mother with diabetes displays its own set of medical complications, including
neonatal respiratory distress, hypoglycemia, hypocalcemia, hyperviscosity (poly-
cythemia) syndrome, cardiomyopathy, and congenital anomalies [1619].
Small-for-gestational-age infants are at risk for increased adverse affects in
the newborn period. These infants have a birth weight less than the tenth
percentile, taking into consideration the population-specific birth weight andthe gestational age. The proportionate reduction in head and body size has
been termed symmetrical growth restriction. Asymmetrical growth restriction
refers to the relative sparing of head size in proportion to the smaller body size.
By definition, intrauterine growth-restricted infants have had a rate of fetal
growth that was less than normal, which produces an infant who is small for
gestational age. Problems in this group of infants include perinatal depression, hy-
pothermia, hypoglycemia, polycythemia-hyperviscosity syndrome, and immune
dysfunction. These children remain at risk for compromised health and devel-
opment throughout their childhood. This is particularly evident as far as somaticgrowth is concerned. Catch-up growth is usually evident by 4 months of age if it
is going to occur. From 4 months onward, the velocity of growth remains
constant and these children remain small [20]. More troublesome are the long-
term studies that suggest that these infants can demonstrate lower cognitive
performance, suboptimal school achievement, and behavioral or mental health
problems [2123].
A spectrum of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy exists. It is usually classified
as mild, moderate, or severe [24]. Infants who manifest mild degrees (ie, normal
neurologic examination at the time of discharge) rarely exhibit neurodevelop-mental sequelae. Infants with a more moderate degree of level of encephalopathy
have a 20% to 40% chance of an abnormal outcome. One hundred percent of
babies with severe encephalopathy demonstrate an abnormal outcome [2529].
The criteria for hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy are as follows: (1) an Apgar
score of 0 to 3 for more than 5 minutes, (2) an umbilical artery metabolic acidosis
or mixed respiratory-metabolic academia with pH less than 7, (3) newborn
neurologic sequelae (eg, seizures, hypotonia, or coma), and (4) multiorgan sys-
tem dysfunction.
The initial concerns surrounding premature birth relate to survival. Chancesfor survival increase from 22 through 33 weeks gestation. At each gestational
age, a lower birth weight carries a higher risk of mortality [30]. Premature infants
may experience a wide range of complications, including chronic lung dis-
ease, periventricular leukomalacia, sepsis, retinopathy of prematurity, intraven-
tricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, hearing deficits, and birth defects
[31]. These neonatal morbidities have an increasing adverse effect on neuro-
L.M. Bear / Pediatr Clin N Am 51 (2004) 685701688
-
7/29/2019 Assess Pci
5/17
logic, developmental, neurosensory, and functional outcomes with decreasing
birth weight.
Vohr et al reported on the neurodevelopmental, neurosensory, and functionaloutcomes of 1151 extremely low birth weight (4011000 g) survivors cared for
in the 12 participating centers of the National Institute of Child Health and Hu-
man Development Neonatal Research Network. They identified medical, social,
and environmental factors associated with these outcomes. Twenty-five percent
of the 1480 surviving infants evaluated at 18 months of age had an abnormal
neurologic examination, 37% had a Bayley II mental developmental index of less
than 70, and 29% had a psychomotor developmental index of less than 70. They
Box 1. Risk category for developmental delay by medical diagnosis
High risk
1. Birth weight less than 1250 g
2. 30 weeks gestation or less
3. Intraventricular hemorrhage/periventricular leukomalacia
4. Severe perinatal asphyxia5. Severe neurologic problems
6. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia that requires home oxygen
7. Complex congenital/cyanotic heart disease
8. Abnormal neurologic examination at discharge
9. Significant feeding problems/requirement of gavage feeding
10. Intracranial pathology: congenital or acquired
11. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
12. Diaphragmatic hernia
13. Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn/requiredinhaled nitric oxide/oscillatory ventilator
14. Significant circulatory failure
15. Congenital viral infection (HIV, TORCH)
16. Prolonged or persistent hypoglycemia
17. Multiple/major congenital anomalies and genetic disorders
Moderate risk
1. Birth weight between 1250 and 1500 g
2. Prolonged ventilation and high-frequency ventilation
3. Surgical: cloacal anomalies/gastroschisis/omphalocele
4. Tracheostomy
5. Metabolic disorders
L.M. Bear / Pediatr Clin N Am 51 (2004) 685701 689
-
7/29/2019 Assess Pci
6/17
found that neurologic, developmental, neurosensory, and functional morbidities
increased with decreasing birth weight. The factors significantly associated with
increased neurodevelopmental morbidity included chronic lung disease, grades3 to 4 intraventricular hemorrhage and periventricular leukomalacia, steroids for
chronic lung disease, necrotizing enterocolitis, and male gender. The factors
significantly associated with decreased morbidity included increased birth
weight, female gender, higher maternal education, and white race [32]. Compro-
mised neurologic status affects cognitive function and later school performance.
Emerging studies of this extremely low birth weight population reveal sig-
nificantly poorer school performance, with particular difficulty in the area of
mathematics. Even children without neurologic impairments have scores that are
significantly lower on cognitive and achievement measures. Social and environ-mental factors, including maternal level of education, contribute to outcome
(Box 1) [3337].
Developmental history
A childs development should follow a predictable pattern. Reviewing a
childs history of acquisition of developmental milestones offers a way to detect
deviations from normal. A developmental history is usually organized bydomains of development. Areas to be included are gross motor skills, fine
motor skills, social interaction, language, and self-help. These domains are not
mutually exclusive, and a childs behaviors can be thought of as belonging
to more than one domain. For example, a 9-month-old child requires social
maturity, motor planning and performance, and symbolic language skills to
wave bye-bye. Anticipatory guidance guidelines offer information on the
timing and standard deviation for normal development. The Bright Futures
publication identifies several desirable health, social, and developmental out-
comes as a result of the implementation of the health supervision. By eliciting adevelopmental history at each visit, the pediatrician has an opportunity to create
a supportive relationship with the parents and educate the family on normal
development of their child.
Social history
The environment in which the family resides has an impact on the develop-
ment of the child. Parental education, financial resources, marriage status/livingarrangements, and family support structures all have an impact on the outcome
of the family. Poverty is one of the primary predictors of poor health outcomes
for children. The child-rearing practices of persons who live in poverty are
more likely to lack some of the elements that are fundamental for optimal
outcomes. Fundamental needs that may not be met include literacy, stimulation,
parental time, books, appropriate educational toys, guidance, role models, and
L.M. Bear / Pediatr Clin N Am 51 (2004) 685701690
-
7/29/2019 Assess Pci
7/17
high expectations [3842]. Caldwell and Bradley developed a psychometrically
valid inventory to describe the quality of the home environment: the HOME
scale (Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment). This is a45-item (infants and toddlers) or 55-item (preschool children) observational
assessment [43].
Family history
A concise, systematic approach to obtaining a complete family history can
provide useful information. The history should encompass three generations:
(1) patient and siblings, (2) parents and their siblings, and (3) grandparents and
their siblings. The usual record consists of medical conditions. If there have been
deaths of family members, the age at death and the cause of death should be
noted. Specific questions should be asked regarding illnesses that have affected
more than one family member, congenital anomalies, and genetic disorders
within the nuclear and extended family unit. The interview also should focus
on the educational achievement of the adults, school difficulties of family
members, and speech, language, learning, and developmental problems.
Physical examination
When performing the physical examination [44], knowledge of normal
anatomy and its variants helps the physician recognize significant findings.
The basic techniques of physical examination should be used and fine tuned to
recognize any subtle physical clues that might be overlooked. Fetal embryogene-
sis and development is a highly intricate process, with parallel and sequential
growth taking place. Any alterations at a specific time may affect more than one
organ system. A well- known example is the association of ear deformities and
kidney anomalies. The ear and kidney have active growth at the same time, sointrauterine influences are reflected on both organs. Parents are highly sensitive
observers of their children, and their concerns should be addressed openly.
Quiet observation of the child can lead to a wealth of information. Look
for subtle differences between opposing sides of the body, face, or extremities.
Unusual or abnormal postures and positioning can lead you to the site of pa-
thology. Torticollis can be suspected by the abnormal tilt or rotation of a babys
head at rest. Passive and active range of motion can confirm this diagnosis.
A complete head-to-toe examination is important to identify abnormalities that
may have an impact on a childs development. The examination may begin withaccurate measurement of growth parameters. Weight, height, and head circum-
ference should be documented routinely and plotted on standard growth forms.
When a child is born prematurely, the adjusted age may be used for plotting these
growth parameters. It is often practical to plot growth parameters at the
chronologic age, however, with the understanding that these parameters are at
a lower percentile than if the child were plotted at the adjusted age. To calculate
L.M. Bear / Pediatr Clin N Am 51 (2004) 685701 691
-
7/29/2019 Assess Pci
8/17
the adjusted age, the amount of prematurity is subtracted from the chronologic
age. The adjusted age should be used when evaluating the developmental level
of infants and young children.During the course of the physical examination deviations should be noted.
Identify, as clearly as possible, any abnormal features. It is often helpful to know
if the baby resembles a family member. Skull shape can vary somewhat among
racial groups, and small degrees of asymmetry can be seen in normal individuals.
More marked asymmetry is often caused by intrauterine deformation or possibly
craniosynostosis. The head circumference provides a rough estimate of brain size.
Conditions such as microcephaly and macrocephaly may indicate an underlying
brain anomaly.
Placement of a childs ears is best judged in relation to other landmarks on thehead and face. Low-set ears and posterior rotation of the ear are common
abnormalities. The junction of the upper pinna to the scalp should be at the
same level as the outer canthus of the eye. The upper limit of the pinna should be
at the level of the eyebrow, whereas the lower level of the pinna should be at the
level of the alae nasi. Preauricular pits or tags may occur in normal individuals,
and variations in the form of a helix are also relatively common.
In general, the face is divided into thirds, with the distance between the inner
canthi of both eyes comparable to the distance between the inner and outer canthi
of each eye. The slant of the palpebral fissure varies, and there are ethnicvariations of eye shape and lid placement. Clefts within the eyelid are considered
abnormal. A white pupil or abnormal placement of the light reflex is always
abnormal. Marked strabismus may be either divergent or convergent in one or
both eyes. If there is a constant deviation after 5 months of age, it requires
examination by a specialist. Pendular nystagmus is a sensorial deficit that always
requires referral. Bilateral lid ptosis may indicate a neuromuscular abnormality.
In the center of the face are only two structures: the nose and philtrum. A
change in length of one usually necessitates a compensatory change in the other.
For example, a short nose often results in a long philtrum. The columella is thetissue that connects the nose tip to the face. This structure, along with the nose tip
and alae nasi, provides an overall picture of the end of the nose. Nasal length and
nasal width have considerable familial and ethnic variation, which makes it
difficult to recognize abnormalities in this region.
The perioral region is evaluated by inspection. The size, symmetry, and shape
of the mouth, lips, and nasal labial folds should be reviewed along with the
contour of the chin and cheeks. Often abnormalities of nervous innervation to the
lower face may be demonstrated when the child cries or laughs. The intraoral
cavity should be examined for patency of palate and its configuration. A cleftpalate is the most common major mouth malformation. There are two classes of
palatal clefts: those that occur in isolation and those that occur in association with
a cleft lip.
When examining the neck it is important to demonstrate head position at rest.
Abnormal hypertonia of neck extensors is demonstrated by an exaggeration of
the space between the posterior neck and table surface when the infant is supine.
L.M. Bear / Pediatr Clin N Am 51 (2004) 685701692
-
7/29/2019 Assess Pci
9/17
The relative width and length should be assessed. Neck mobility, including ex-
tension, flexion, and rotation, is evaluated by passive and active range of motion.
A short neck usually is the result of an absence or malformation of one or morecervical vertebrae, and neck mobility is then limited, particularly during flexion.
Rotational activity is more often limited with torticollis.
The shoulders superiorly and lower rib inferiorly delineate the chest. General
shape of the thorax and nipple placement and symmetry should be noted. One of
the minor variants that is often seen is pectus excavatum (funnel chest). This
condition may be of cosmetic concern but usually causes no physiologic
problems. Shield chest is an unusually broad and often short upper thorax and
is frequently associated with wide-spaced nipples.
The back is first inspected for general configuration and symmetry. Specialattention should be paid to the lower back, where sacral dimples or other midline
abnormalities may be found. If an abnormality is found, it must be differentiated
from a minor or major degree of spinal dysraphism. The chance of an underlying
defect increases if found above the natal cleft. It may be necessary to separate the
buttocks to view the entire spine.
Examination of the heart is accomplished through inspection, palpation, and
auscultation. Congenital heart defects can occur in isolation or in association with
other anomalies. Children with these defects may experience inadequate weight
gain secondary to poor caloric intake and an increase in metabolic rate. The childcan experience a concurrent decrease in strength and stamina, with a delay in the
acquisition of motor milestones. Early intervention encourages normal develop-
mental patterns until the heart defect can be corrected [4547].
The abdominal examination begins with a brief inspection, and one should
pay close attention to symmetry, muscle tone, and the presence of major or minor
defects in the abdominal wall. Children who have had surgical procedures that
required an abdominal approach experience disruption of their abdominal
musculature and may display a decrease in abdominal flexor muscle strength.
Special attention should be paid to the umbilicus. Umbilical hernias can rangewidely in size, and often the abdominal wall defect is considerably smaller than
the hernial sac. A palpable defect smaller than 1 cm in diameter could be
considered a normal variant and should close spontaneously within 2 to 3 years.
The genitourinary system is a complex system. The complexity is second only
to that of the face and brain. Disruption in this area can be accompanied by
changes within the pelvis. Bladder extrophy is one such condition in which the
hips are often widely abducted with the pelvis tilted. Sitting skills may be
delayed. It is important to partner with a surgeon to optimize motor skills without
compromising surgical correction. Inspection of the female external genitalia isusually the only examination that is required. Internal inspection should be
reserved for patients with a strong suspicion of anomalies. Examination of male
genitalia involves inspection and palpation. Location of both testes should be
documented. When either the testis or penis seems unusually small or large,
referral to a pediatric urologist is warranted for further evaluation. When
ambiguous genitalia are discovered, it is important to note the size and textures
L.M. Bear / Pediatr Clin N Am 51 (2004) 685701 693
-
7/29/2019 Assess Pci
10/17
of the various structures. The location of the urethral opening also should be
documented. Investigation should be undertaken to determine the presence or
absence of the vaginal introitus. The possible labia majora should be palpated formasses that may represent a testis or ova testis.
The skin is the largest organ in the body; many cutaneous abnormalities have
been described [48]. Many of these skin anomalies are localized and benign,
whereas others may provide valuable clues to underlying medical or neurologic
conditions. Areas of hyper- or hypopigmentation, changes in elasticity, and
discrete lesions may lead to a significant medical diagnosis. The texture of the
hair, placement of the hairline, presence of hair in the pubic or axillary area, and
unusual patches of hair elsewhere on the body should be documented. Fine hair
covering the bodylanugois often found in many infants. Nail color, size,shape, and thickness should be elucidated by physical inspection. Fingernails
should be inspected from the dorsal surface and end-on.
Examination of the extremities is best performed with the child in a recumbent
or sitting position. Limb length and bulk are judged. A difference of more than
1 cm in leg length eventually produces a pelvic tilt [49]. Palpation of the limbs
determines size and consistency of the muscles. When any asymmetry is
suspected, referral for accurate measurement and evaluation is warranted.
Examination of the large joints of the body should accompany the limb
examination and should include rotation, flexion, extension, and active rangeof motion. During inspection of the hands and feet, syndactyly, joint laxity, and
presence or absence of a plantar arch should be looked for. Increased flexibility
across various joints is often seen in various ethnic groups and on a familial basis.
Excessive hyperextensibility, particularly of small joints, along with creased
elasticity of the skin is seen in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.
The Ortolani maneuver should be performed at routine intervals during an
infants life. A marked asymmetry of hip abduction warrants referral for further
evaluation. Ultrasonic evaluation is best performed between 2 and 6 weeks of
age but can be used up to 4 months of age. Once an infant is 4 months of age,the plain radiograph becomes the imaging modality of choice because the femoral
head is ossified [50].
Subtle changes in a neurologic examination may have enormous significance
in eventual development of that child. A complete neurologic examination should
be performed at regular intervals. Evaluation of the nervous system provides
information regarding motor function and sensory integrity. Neurologic findings
can vary depending on the patients state of alertness and desire to interact with
the environment. For example, immediately after a feeding, the neonatal reflexes
tend to be less distinct and muscle tone may seem diminished compared withfindings just before a feeding.
The cranial nerves are used to elicit some basic primitive responses. Evalu-
ation should include the ability for the child to fix and follow and the ability to
suck, swallow, and hear. Some of the primitive reflexes that should dissipate over
the first 8 months of life include the palmar grasp, rooting/sucking, moro, and
atonic neck reflex. Hands may remain closed until 2 months of age, and thumb
L.M. Bear / Pediatr Clin N Am 51 (2004) 685701694
-
7/29/2019 Assess Pci
11/17
adduction should be checked for. The atonic neck reflex can be present until
3 months of age and should dissipate between 3 and 6 months of age. With the
resolution of primitive reflexes, various postural reflexes are then elucidated.These reflexes include neck righting, parachute, and the Landau maneuver.
The peripheral deep tendon reflexes are synonymous with the stretch reflex.
They describe a neuronal arc that consists of a muscle contraction with the
impulse traveling to the dorsal route ganglia. The efferent side consists of the
motor neuron along with its terminal structures that innervate the muscle. Central
influences can modify the response of the motor neuron. The elicitation of a
motor response means that the arc is intact and conducting impulses. The absence
of response does not necessarily indicate an abnormal state because neural
influences may suppress the reflex. Reflexes that should be checked includethe biceps, triceps, patellar, and quadriceps reflexes, which are graded by the
degree of response elicited. When no response is forthcoming, the grade is
zero. If a reflex response is elicited by reinforcement, then the arc is intact,
although possibly inhibited. A 1+ response is in the low normal range; 2+ is
considered a normal or average response; 3+ is a brisk response and may indicate
disease; a 4+ response is very brisk and is associated with clonus and shows
evidence of disease.
The Babinski sign is considered by some researchers to be the most important
sign in neurology. When present after the age of 12 to 16 months, it indicatesdysfunction of the corticospinal motor system. The Babinski sign is referred to as
being present or absent, not positive or negative. An absent Babinski reveals
intact neurologic function and consists of flexion of the forefoot with adduction
of the toes. The presence of a Babinski sign is an abnormal response and is seen
with dorsiflexion of the great toe and fanning of the others. This is often
accompanied by withdrawal at the knee and hip.
It is crucial to have a solid understanding of normal developmental landmarks
to assess the state of nervous system function at the various ages in infancy.
Motor skills are generally acquired in relatively constant sequence during the first2 years of life. This sequential attainment of milestones cements the evidence of
nervous system integrity. Factors unrelated to brain disease may hinder the
orderly appearance of developmental milestones. Maternal or sensory deprivation
may result in deficits in the motor and speech realms. Prematurity, serious
generalized disease, and recurrent infections can have an impact and retard
development during the first year of life. This may occur with an intact nervous
system. As with all of pediatrics, the neurologic examination in an infant must be
performed in a less systemized fashion than that of an adult. Quiet observation
can yield a wealth of information, such as information in the areas of symmetryof limb movement, organization of ocular movements, and degree of interest in
and an awareness of the babys surroundings. The ability to suck, cry appropri-
ately, and move passively can be obtained [51].
The Moro reflex should be a part of the examination of any infant. It is
normally present from birth until 3 to 4 months of age. During this 4-month
period, the intensity of the response should diminish. If the Moro reflex persists
L.M. Bear / Pediatr Clin N Am 51 (2004) 685701 695
-
7/29/2019 Assess Pci
12/17
in a full-term infant past 4 months of age, neurologic disease should be suspected.
If it is present at 6 months of age, it almost always indicates a significant disorder.
Absence of the response in a neonate does not necessarily indicate brain diseaseand is often difficult to elicit in premature infants. An asymmetric response
may suggest hemiparesis, injury to the brachial plexus, or a fracture of the
clavicle or humerus.
Rooting and sucking reflexes are more active if the child has not been recently
fed. Persistence of these reflexes beyond 4 months of age suggests bilateral brain
dysfunction. Chewing or mouthing movements may indicate an underlying
neurologic disorder.
The infant should blink in response to a bright light, and the pupils should
constrict simultaneously. Conjugate movements develop rapidly after birth; how-ever, infants are often unable to follow objects during the first few weeks of
life. By 3 months of age an infant should be able to fix and follow a red ring.
The newborn infants hands are held in a fisted position during much of the
awake period. The hands tend to open and become more relaxed after 4 weeks
of age. Persistence of a specific posture in one hand after 2 months of age may
indicate an emerging spastic hemiparesis. The grasp reflex is symmetrical and
present at birth and should persist for 2 to 3 months.
The asymmetric tonic neck reflex, or fencing pose, is a normal response
between 1 and 5 months of age. The infant should be able to overcome thisresponse (nonobligate). Persistence of this reflex or response that persists beyond
6 months of age or is an obligate response is considered abnormal.
Stepping movements are obtained by supporting a child in an upright position
with the bottom of his or her feet in firm contact with a table. This response lasts
for 3 to 4 weeks and provides evidence of neurologic integrity. While holding the
child in this position, an assessment of muscle tone also can be made. Scissoring
of the legs is always considered abnormal.
By 6 months of age, a normal infant no longer should show evidence of these
primitive reflexes. Persistence of these reflexes without a good explanationrequires further investigation.
Performing the Amiel-Tison angles completes neurologic examination [52].
These measurements of passive tone are similar to what is obtained in the
newborn examination. The angles that are tested include the scarf sign, popliteal
angle, adductor angle, heel-to-ear maneuver, and foot dorsiflexion. There are
age-appropriate standards for measuring the various angles. As a child grows
from infancy to young childhood, he or she becomes more flexible with an
increase in measured angles. Asymmetry between the two sides can be elicited.
An assessment of muscle tone can be obtained while performing these maneu-vers (Fig. 1).
The scarf sign is performed with the child in the supine position. In a quiet
alert state, with the childs back flat against a hard surface, the wrist is grasped
and swept across the chest until resistance is felt. Three possible positions are
obtained: (1) the elbow does not reach the midline, (2) the elbow passes the
midline, (3) the arm encircles the neck.
L.M. Bear / Pediatr Clin N Am 51 (2004) 685701696
-
7/29/2019 Assess Pci
13/17
The popliteal angle is obtained with the child in the supine position with the
buttocks on the table surface. With the hands placed over the childs knees, the
thighs are flexed laterally and then the lower leg is extended. The angle ismeasured based on the measurement between the thigh and calf. Both legs are
measured simultaneously. A difference between the two sides of 10 to 20
indicates significant asymmetry.
The adductor angle is obtained with the infant in the supine position, legs ex-
tended and gently abducting the lower extremities. The angle is measured by
drawing an imaginary line along both inner thighs with the vertex at the symphy-
sis pubis. If this angle is bisected, the two angles should be relatively equal.
The heel-to-ear maneuver requires a measurement with both legs extended and
then moved toward the head. The angle is measured from the flat surface alongthe back of the leg to the infants heel. The pelvis should not lift off the table. If
it is not possible to extend the lower limbs because the hips are in a fixed
hyperflexed posture, then this is considered an abnormal sign.
Foot dorsiflexion is measured with the leg extended and the foot flexed onto
the shin. Pressure should be applied to the sole of the foot. The dorsum of the
foot and the anterior aspect of the leg form the angle. The usual range of 60 to
70 persists throughout infancy. A slow and rapid angle should be measured.
A difference of more than 10 indicates an abnormal exaggerated stretch re-
flex (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2. Normal pattern of passive tone within first year of life. (Adapted from Amiel-Tison C. A method
for neurological evaluation within the first year of lige. Curr Probl Pediatr 1976;7:1; with permission.)
L.M. Bear / Pediatr Clin N Am 51 (2004) 685701 697
-
7/29/2019 Assess Pci
14/17
Developmental screening tools
Numerous developmental tools can be used for screening infants and young
children. It is important that the screening tool be easy to administer and is
accurate between evaluations. The aim of a developmental screening tool is to
identify children who need a more comprehensive evaluation. Some of the more
well-known tools include the Denver Developmental Assessment, the Capute
Scales (Cat/Clams), and the Bayley Infant Neurodevelopmental Screener. If a
child was born more than 2 weeks before the expected date of delivery, the
adjusted age should be used. A developmental quotient can be calculated for each
domain. For example, at a chronologic age of 13 months a child is not able to
perform a specific age-appropriate developmental task but is able accomplish the
tasks at the 10-month level. The child is functioning at 77% of the expected level.
A developmental quotient of 70% indicates a significant delay.
The Denver Developmental Screening Test [53] was designed as a screening
tool for apparently normal children from birth to 6 years of age. It has 125 well-
standardized, easily administered test items in a one-page format. This test
encompasses four general areas of development: fine motor, gross motor,
personal and social skills, and language. The items are arranged in these four
sections. When two or more delays are noted (ie, the child refuses an item or it
falls completely to the left of the age line), the child is considered to have failed
the screening and more definitive developmental assessment must be undertaken.
The Denver-II screening test is known to have modest sensitivity and specificity
depending on the interpretation of questionable results.
The Capute Scales [54] are an assessment tool that examines visual motor and
problem-solving and language abilities. CLAMS stands for clinical linguistic and
auditory milestones. It was developed, standardized, and validated for language
development from birth to 36 months of age. The CAT (clinical adaptive test)
examines problem-solving items from birth to 36 months. Items are recorded as
yes for pass and no for failed. If two consecutive months are scored as
yes, a basal age is determined. Items at the next higher level are then
administered until two consecutive levels of no responses are obtained.
The Bayley Infant Neurodevelopmental Screener [55] is a tool to assess
children in blocks of age from birth until 24 months of age. It is used primarily as
a screening instrument; however, it also can be used as a surveillance instrument.
Each group of items assesses fine motor, gross motor, language, and social
interactive and play skills. The child receives a point if the item is accomplished
and a zero if it is not. The child is placed in one of three categories: low,
moderate, or high risk for developmental delay. This screening tool is easy to
administer and takes approximately 10 minutes to administer, and the adminis-
tration format is easy to follow.
Recently, screening tools have been developed that respond to parental
concerns. By using these tools, parents become active participants in the care
of their child. These concerns have proven to be highly predictive of true
problems [56,57]. These parental report questionnaires have good psychometric
L.M. Bear / Pediatr Clin N Am 51 (2004) 685701698
-
7/29/2019 Assess Pci
15/17
properties and have been standardized on diverse populations and provide
accurate information about development. They have the added benefit of
requiring much less direct time from the primary care provider. Some of theinstruments include the Parents Evaluation of Developmental Status [58], Ages
and Stages Questionnaires [59], and the Child Development Inventories [60].
Summary
Early identification of infants at risk for developmental delay is of the utmost
importance to initiate appropriate intervention. Although early detection can be a
challenge, the primary care practitioner is in the ideal position to recognize andrefer these children. Early recognition requires an in-depth knowledge of the
childs history, general physical examination, and developmental level and an
understanding of the expected developmental precursors of a skill. Referral to
appropriate interventional resources leads to a formalized developmental and
neurologic evaluation. If necessary, the development of an interdisciplinary
comprehensive plan of remediation can occur and a definitive diagnosis can be
made. If no significant problem is found, a decision to provide expectant
observation is warranted.
References
[1] Singer T, Arendt R, Minnes S, Farkas K, Salvator A, Kirchner HL, et al. Cognitive and motor
outcomes of cocaine-exposed infants. JAMA 2002;287(15):195260.
[2] Cunningham FG, et al, editors. Dystocia: abnormal labor and fetopelvic proportion. Williams
obstetrics. 21st edition. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001. p. 428.
[3] Chasnoff IJ, Anson A, Harcher R, Stenson H, Iaukea K, Randolph LA. Cocaine and other drugs:
outcome at four to six years. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1998;846:314 28.
[4] Friedman EA. Labor: clinical evaluation and management. 2nd edition. New York: Appleton-
Century-Crofts; 1978.
[5] Avery ME, Gatewood OB, Brumley G. Transient tachypnea of the newborn: possible delayed
resorption of fluid at birth. Am J Dis Child 1966;111:3805.
[6] Nelson K, Ellenberg JH. Obstetric complications as risk factors for cerebral palsy or seizure
disorders. JAMA 1984;251:1843 8.
[7] Nelson KB, Ellenberg JH. Apgar scores as predictors of chronic neurologic disability. Pediatrics
1981;68:3644.
[8] American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on the fetus and newborn use and abuse of the
Apgar score. Pediatrics 1986;78:1148.
[9] Hegyi T, Carbone T, Anwar M, et al. The Apgar score and its components in the preterm infant.
Pediatrics 1998;101:77.
[10] Casey BM, Mcintire DD, Levano KJ. The continuing value of the Apgar score for the assessment
of newborn infants. N Engl J Med 2001;344(7):46771.
[11] Centers for Disease Control. 2000 CDC growth chart for the United States: Methods and
developments. Available at: www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/nhanes/growthcharts. Accessed
May 1, 2003.
[12] Benito CW, Thayler CF, Lake MF, Knippel RA, Vinizeleo AM. Predictors of fetal macrosomia.
Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:351.
L.M. Bear / Pediatr Clin N Am 51 (2004) 685701 699
http://%20http//www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/nhanes/growthchartshttp://%20http//www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/nhanes/growthchartshttp://%20http//www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/nhanes/growthchartshttp://%20http//www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/nhanes/growthcharts -
7/29/2019 Assess Pci
16/17
[13] Chervenak JL. Macrosomia in the postdates pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1992;35:161.
[14] Perlow JH, Morgan MA, Montgomery D, Towers CV, Porto M. Perinatal outcome in pregnancy
complicated by massive obesity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;167:958.
[15] Kliegman RM, Stoll BJ. The fetus and the neonatal infant. In: Behrman RE, Kliegman RM,
Jenson HB, editors. The textbook of pediatrics. 16th edition. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co.;
2000. p. 485, 5324.
[16] Lucas A, Morley R, Cole TJ. Adverse neurodevelopmental outcome of moderate neonatal
hypoglycaemia. BMJ 1989;297:1304.
[17] Sells CJ, Robinso NM, Brown Z, et al. Long-term developmental follow-up of infants of dia-
betic mothers. J Pediatr 1994;125:S9.
[18] Robert MF, Neff RK, Hubbell JP. Association between maternal diabetes and the respiratory-
distress syndrome in the newborn. N Engl J Med 1976;294:357.
[19] Strauss RS, Dietz WH. Effects of intrauterine growth retardation in premature infants on early
childhood growth. J Pediatr 1997;130:95102.
[20] Bos AR, Einspieler C, Prechtl HFR. Intrauterine growth retardation, general movements, and
neurodevelopmental outcome: a review. Dev Med Child Neurol 2001;43:61 8.
[21] Larroque B, Bertrai S, Czernichow P, Lege J. School difficulties in 10-year-olds who were born
small for gestational age at term in a regional cohort study. Pediatrics 2001;108(1):1115.
[22] Hollo O, Rautava P, Korhonen T, Helenius H, Kero P, Siollanpaa M. Academic achievement of
small-for-gestational-age children at age 10 years. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002;156: 179 87.
[23] Zubrick SR, Kurinczuk JJ, McDermott BM, McKelvey RS, Silburn SR, Davies LC. Fetal growth
and subsequent mental health problems in children 4 to 13 years. Dev Med Child Neurol 2000;
43:1420.
[24] Sarnat HB, Sarnat MS. Neonatal encephalopathy following fetal distress: a clinical and electro-
encephalographic study. Arch Neurol 1976;33:696705.[25] Finer NN, Robertson CM, Richards RT, Pinnell LE, Peters KL. Hypoxic-ischemic encephalop-
athy in term neonates: perinatal factors and outcome. J Pediatr 1981;98:1127.
[26] Robertson C, Finer N. Term infants with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: outcome at
3.5 years. Dev Med Child Neurol 1985;27:473 84.
[27] Robertson CM, Finer NN, Grace MG. School performance of survivors of neonatal encepha-
lopathy associated with birth asphyxia at term. J Pediatr 1989;114:75360.
[28] Scott H. Outcome of very severe birth asphyxia. Arch Dis Child 1976;51:712 6.
[29] Dixon G, Psych B, Badawi N, Kurinczuk JJ, Keogh JM, Silburn SR, et al. Early developmental
outcomes after newborn encephalopathy. Pediatrics 2002;109(1):26 33.
[30] Depp R, Lemons J. Perinatal care at the threshold of viability. American College of Obstetrics
and Gynecology Practice Bulletin 2002;38(3):61724.[31] Rasmussen SA, Moore CA, Paulozzi LJ, Rhodenhiser EP. Risk for birth defects among prema-
ture infants: a population-based study. J Pediatr 2001;138(5):66873.
[32] Vohr BR, Wright LL, Dusick AM, Mele L, Verter J, Steichen JJ, et al. Neurodevelopmental and
functional outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants in the National Institute of Child
Health and Human Development neonatal research network, 1993 1994. Pediatrics 2000;
105(6):121622.
[33] McGrath MM, Sullivan MC, Lester BM, Oh W. Longitudinal neurologic follow-up in neo-
natal intensive care unit survivors with various neonatal morbidities. Pediatrics 2000;106(6):
1397405.
[34] Saigal S, Hoult LA, Streiner DL, Stodskopf BL, Rosenbaum PL. School difficulties at adoles-
cence in a regional cohort of children who were extremely low birth weight. Pediatrics 2000;105(2):32531.
[35] Saigal S. Follow-up of very low birthweight babies to adolescence. Semin Neonatol 2000;5(2):
10718.
[36] Vohr BR, Allan WC, Westerveld M, Schneider KC, Katz KH, Makuch RW, et al. School-age
outcomes of very low birth weight infants in the indomethacin intraventricular hemorrhage
prevention trial. Pediatrics 2003;111(4 Pt 1):340 6.
L.M. Bear / Pediatr Clin N Am 51 (2004) 685701700
-
7/29/2019 Assess Pci
17/17
[37] Green M, editor. Bright futures. Arlington: National Center for Education in Maternal and Child
Health; 1994.
[38] Schor EL. The influence of families on child health: family behaviors and child outcomes.
Pediatr Clin North Am 1995;42(1):89102.
[39] Accaardo PJ, Whitman BY. Children of mentally retarded parents. Am J Dis Child 1990;144:69.
[40] Baldwin W, Cain VS. The children of teenage parents. Fam Plan Perspect 1980;21:34.
[41] Bradley RH, Caldwell BM. 174 children: a study of their relationship between home environ-
ment and cognitive development during the first 5 years. In: Gottfried AW, editor. Home envi-
ronment and early cognitive development. Orlando: Academic Press; 1984.
[42] Zuckerman B, Winsmore G, Alpert JJ. A study of attitudes and support systems of inner city
adolescent mothers. J Pediatr 1979;95(1):122.
[43] Caldwell BM, Bradley RH. Home observation for measurement of environment. Revised edi-
tion. Little Rock (AR): University of Little Rock; 1984.
[44] Aase JM. The physical examination in dysmorphology. In: Aase JM, editor. Diagnostic dysmor-
phology. New York: Plenum Medical Book Co.; 1990. p. 33 258.
[45] Mahle WT, Clancy RR, Moss EM, Gerds M, Jobes DR, Wernovsky G. Neurodevelopmental
outcome and lifestyles assessment in school-aged and adolescent children with hypoplastic left
heart syndrome. Pediatrics 2000;105(5):10829.
[46] Majnemer A, Limperiopoulos C. Developmental progress of children with congenital heart
defects requiring open heart surgery. Semin Pediatr Neurol 1996;1:129.
[47] Wernovsky G, Stiles KM, Gauvrerau K, Gentles TL, duPlessis AJ, Bellinger DC, et al. Cogni-
tive development after the fontan operation. Circulation 2000;102:883 9.
[48] Syber VP. Genetic skin disorders. New York: Oxford University Press; 1997.
[49] Hensinger RN, Jones ET. Developmental orthopaedics. I: The lower limb. Dev Med Child
Neurol 1982;24:95 116.[50] Hensinger RN. Congenital dislocation of the hip. CIBA Clinical Symposia 1979;3:1 31.
[51] Blasco PA. Pitfalls in developmental diagnosis. Pediatr Clin North Am 1991;8(6):1425 38.
[52] Amiel-Tison C, Grenier A. Neurological assessment. In: Amiel-Tison C, Grenier A, editors.
Neurological assessment during the first year of life. New York: Oxford University Press;
1986. p. 5883.
[53] Frankenburg WE, Dodds JB. The Denver Development Assessment (Denver II). Denver: Uni-
versity of Colorado Medical School; 1990.
[54] Capute AJ, Accardo PJ. The infant neurodevelopmental assessment: a clinical interpretative
manual for CAT-CLAMS. Curr Probl Pediatr 1997;26:23857.
[55] Aylward GP. Bayley infant neurodevelopmental screener. San Antonio: The Psychological Cor-
poration; 1995.[56] Glascoe FP, Dworkin PH. The role of parents in the detection of developmental and behavioral
problems. Pediatrics 1995;95:829 36.
[57] Glascoe FP, Altemeier WA, MacLean WE. The importance of parents concerns about their
childs development. Am J Dis Child 1989;143:9558.
[58] Glascoe FP. Collaborating with parents: using parents evaluation of developmental status to
detect and address developmental and behavioral problems. Nashville: Ellsworth and Vander-
meer Press; 1998.
[59] Bricker D, Squires J. Ages and stages questionnaires: a parent-completed, child-monitoring
system. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes; 1999.
[60] Ireton H. Child development inventory. Minneapolis: Behavior Science Systems; 1992.
L.M. Bear / Pediatr Clin N Am 51 (2004) 685701 701