asbestos & lead paint survey report · asbestos & lead paint survey report curtiss-wright...

Asbestos & Lead Paint Survey Report

Curtiss-Wright Hangar

Jim Hamilton LB Owens Airport

Columbia, South Carolina

June 30, 2011

Terracon Project No. 73117715

Prepared for:

Congaree Coalition and



Prepared by:

Terracon Consultants, Inc.


Terracon Consul tants, Inc. 521 Clemson Road Columbia, South Carolina 29229

P [803] 741 9000 F [803] 741 9900 terracon.com

June 30, 2011

Congaree Coalition

PO Box 734

Columbia, South Carolina 29201

Attn: Mr. Fred Delk

Executive Director

Re: Asbestos & Lead Paint Survey Report

Curtiss-Wright Hangar


Columbia, SC

Terracon Project No. 73117715

Dear Mr. Delk:

Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) is pleased to present the results of the asbestos and

lead paint survey performed on June 23, 2011, at the Curtiss-Wright Hangar located at the

intersection of Airport Boulevard and Jim Hamilton Boulevard in Columbia, South Carolina.

We understand that this survey was requested due to the potential renovation of the structure.

Asbestos-containing materials (ACM) were detected in the samples collected from the

building. Additionally, lead was identified in painted components and substrates. Please refer

to the report for details.

Terracon appreciates the opportunity to provide environmental consulting services for the

Congaree Coalition and Richland County. If you should have any questions regarding this

report, or if you need assistance with bid documents or project oversight during the building

renovation, please contact the undersigned at (803) 741-9000.

Sincerely,


William Walker Norman E. Partin, Jr, CHMM Environmental Scientist Manager, ESA Services Department

Cc: Brian Kvam, PG – CTC-PBC

Chris Eversmann, PE – Jim Hamilton LB Owens Airport

TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER LETTER

1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1

1.1. Project Objective ........................................................................................... 1 2.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................ 2 3.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY ............................................................................................... 2

3.1 Regulatory Overview ..................................................................................... 2 3.2 Visual Assessment ........................................................................................ 3 3.3 Physical Assessment .................................................................................... 3 3.4 Sample Collection ......................................................................................... 3 3.5 Sample Analysis............................................................................................ 4 3.6 Finding and Recommendations ..................................................................... 4

4.0 LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY ................................................................................ 5

4.1 Regulatory Overview ..................................................................................... 5 4.2 Sampling and Analytical Protocol .................................................................. 6 4.3 Sample Collection ......................................................................................... 6 4.4 Findings and Recommendations ................................................................... 6

5.0 GENERAL COMMENTS ........................................................................................... 6

LIST OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX A - TABLES Table 1 - Asbestos Survey Sample Summary Table 2 - Lead Based Paint Sample Summary

APPENDIX B – LABORATORY REPORTS

Asbestos Analytical Laboratory Data Lead Paint Analytical Laboratory Data

APPENDIX C – INSPECTOR’S CREDENTIALS

APPENDIX D – PHOTO DOCUMENTATION

Reliable ■ Responsive ■ Convenient ■ Innovative 1

ASBESTOS & LEAD PAINT SURVEY REPORT

CURTISS-WRIGHT HANGAR

JIM HAMILTON LB OWENS AIRPORT

COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA

Project No. 73117715

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) conducted an asbestos and lead paint survey of building

materials at the Curtiss-Wright Hangar located at the intersection of Airport Boulevard and Jim

Hamilton Boulevard in Columbia, South Carolina. The asbestos and lead paint survey was

conducted on June 23, 2011, by a South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental

Control (SCDHEC) licensed building inspector in general accordance with our Proposal No

P73110128 dated May 19, 2011. Interior and exterior building components were surveyed and

homogeneous areas of suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACM) were visually identified and

documented. Although reasonable effort was made to survey accessible suspect materials,

additional suspect but un-sampled materials could be located in walls, in voids or in other

concealed areas. Suspect ACM was sampled in general accordance with the sampling protocols

outlined in EPA Regulation 40 CFR 763 (Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, AHERA).

Samples were delivered to an accredited laboratory for analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy

(PLM) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), as required.

Paint samples were collected from all visible and accessible building components and paint

systems and submitted to an Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELAP)

approved laboratory for analysis of lead by NIOSH Method 7082M (Atomic Absorption).

1.1. Project Objective

We understand the asbestos and lead paint survey was requested due to the potential interior

renovation of the building. EPA regulation 40 CFR 61, Subpart M, National Emission Standards

for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), prohibits the release of asbestos fibers to the

atmosphere during renovation/demolition activities. NESHAP requires that potentially regulated

asbestos-containing building materials be identified, classified and quantified prior to planned

disturbances or demolition activities.

The objective of the lead paint evaluation was to identify lead based paint systems on building

components that may require special handling and disposal considerations upon renovation of the

structure.

Asbestos & Lead Paint Survey Report Curtiss-Wright Hangar ■ Columbia, SC June 30, 2011 ■ Terracon Project No. 73117715

Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 2

2.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTION

The site contains a one-story, approximately 13,000 square-foot airport hangar reportedly

constructed in 1929. The building is a brick and steel framed structure with an arched metal

roof. The hangar has two side wings also constructed of brick. The east wing is divided into

three rooms including a bathroom. One partition wall is plywood, the other concrete block. An

exterior concrete stairway rises up to the top of the east wing which has a concrete floor. The

west wing is open with no partition walls. The west wing roof is covered with tar and gravel.

The hangar floors are concrete. Interior finishes consist of deteriorating plaster walls or exposed

brick. The middle room of the east wing has terra cotta tile and 9” vinyl tile over concrete. The

hangar contains a basement boiler room and coal room with chute. Windows in the hangar are

large metal framed window and make up a large portion of the perimeter walls. Large metal

sliding doors are located on the north and south ends of the building. No HVAC system was

observed.

3.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY

The asbestos survey was conducted by Mr. Gene Partin; SCDHEC licensed Asbestos Building

Inspector (License No. BI-00473, exp. 9/30/11). The survey was conducted on June 23, 2011, in

general accordance with the sampling protocols established by EPA Regulation 40 CFR 763,

AHERA. A summary of survey activities is provided below.

3.1 Regulatory Overview

The asbestos NESHAP (40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M) regulates asbestos fiber emissions and

asbestos waste disposal practices. It also requires the identification and classification of existing

building materials prior to demolition or renovation activity. Under NESHAP, asbestos-containing

building materials are classified as either friable, Category I non-friable or Category II non-friable

ACM. Friable materials are those that, when dry, may be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to

powder by hand pressure. Category I non friable ACM includes packing materials, gaskets,

resilient floor coverings and asphalt roofing products containing more than 1 percent (%)

asbestos. Category II non-friable ACM are non-friable materials other than Category I materials

that contain more than 1% asbestos.

Friable ACM, Category I and Category II non-friable ACM which is in poor condition and has

become friable or which will be subjected to drilling, sanding, grinding, cutting or abrading and

which could be crushed or pulverized during anticipated demolition activities are considered

regulated ACM (RACM). RACM must be removed prior to renovation or demolition activities.

In the state of South Carolina, asbestos activities are regulated by the SCDHEC under the

SCDHEC Regulation 61-86.1 Standards of Performance for Asbestos Projects (Effective June 27,

2008). The SCDHEC require that any asbestos-related activity conducted in a public building be



performed by personnel licensed by the SCDHEC. The owner or operator must provide the

SCDHEC with written notification of planned removal activities at least 10 working days prior to

the commencement of asbestos abatement activities. Asbestos abatement must be performed by

SCDHEC-licensed asbestos abatement contractors in accordance with a Project Design prepared

by a SCDHEC-licensed Asbestos Consultant. Third-party air monitoring must be conducted

during the abatement activities.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Asbestos Standard for Construction

Industry (29 CFR 1926.1101) regulates workplace exposure to asbestos. The OSHA standard

requires that employee exposure to airborne asbestos fibers be maintained below 0.1 asbestos

fibers per cubic centimeter of air (0.1 f/cc). The OSHA standard classifies construction and

maintenance activities, which could disturb ACM, and specifies work practices and precautions

which employers must follow when engaging in each class of regulated work.

3.2 Visual Assessment

Our survey activities began with visual observation of the interior and exterior of the building to

identify apparent homogeneous areas of suspect ACM. A homogeneous area consists of building

materials, which appear similar throughout in terms of color, texture and date of application.

Building materials which were not identified as concrete, glass, wood, masonry, metal or rubber

were considered suspect ACM. The exterior survey included an assessment of the exterior

walls and roof.

3.3 Physical Assessment

A physical assessment of each homogeneous area of suspect ACM was conducted to assess the

friability and condition of the materials. A friable material is defined by the EPA as a material,

which can be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure when dry. Friability

was assessed by physically touching suspect materials.

3.4 Sample Collection

Based on the results of the visual sampling, bulk samples of suspect ACM were collected in

general accordance with AHERA sample collection protocols. Random samples of suspect

materials were collected in each homogeneous area. Bulk samples were collected using wet

methods as applicable to reduce the potential for fiber release. Samples were placed in sealable

containers and labeled with unique sample numbers using an indelible marker.

Fifty-nine (59) bulk samples were collected from areas of suspect ACM in the buildings. The bulk

samples were collected from the following interior and exterior materials:

Window glazing Black roof tar flashing



Deck tar

Thin window felt

Thick window felt

Metal roof insulating layer

Pipe elbow insulation

Black 9” floor tile and mastic

Gray roof flashing

Plaster and skim coat

Wire wrap

Silver paint

Pipe insulation

White 9” floor tile and mastic

A summary of the suspect ACM samples collected during the survey is presented in Table 1 in

Appendix A.

3.5 Sample Analysis

Bulk samples were submitted under chain of custody to EMSL Analytical, Inc. (EMSL) of

Charlotte, North Carolina for analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with dispersion

staining techniques per EPA methodology (40 CFR 763, Subpart F). The percentage of asbestos,

where applicable, was determined by microscopical visual estimation. EMSL is accredited under

the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program NVLAP (#200841-0). Layered analysis

of samples was conducted by the lab to separate the tile and mastic and plaster base coat and

finish.

Per the SCDHEC Regulation 61-86.1 Standards of Performance for Asbestos Projects (effective

June 27, 2008), negative results for non-friable organically bound (NOB) materials such as

flooring and roofing shall be verified with at least one TEM analysis.

None of the NOB materials tested negative for asbestos by PLM analysis and thus no TEM

analysis was required.

3.6 Finding and Recommendations

Based on the results of laboratory analyses, the following materials tested positive for asbestos:

Window glazing

Deck tar

Thin window felt

Thick window felt

Metal roof insulating layer

Pipe elbow insulation

Black roof tar flashing

Gray roof flashing

Pipe insulation

White 9” floor tile and mastic

Black 9” floor tile and mastic

Table 1 in the Appendix A summarizes the results of the visual inspection, estimated quantities,

and laboratory analyses. Asbestos laboratory analytical reports are included in Appendix B.

Terracon recommends removal of the asbestos-containing materials by a South Carolina licensed

asbestos abatement contractor prior to renovation of the building.



It should be noted that suspect materials, other than those identified during the June 23, 2011

survey may exist within the structure. Should suspect materials other than those which were

identified during this survey be uncovered during or prior to the abatement and demolition

process, those materials should be assumed asbestos-containing until sampling and analysis can

confirm or refute their asbestos content. Should future sampling indicate that the roof system, or

other material, is asbestos containing, Terracon recommends removal of the asbestos-containing

materials by a South Carolina licensed asbestos abatement contractor prior to renovation of the

building.

4.0 LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY

4.1 Regulatory Overview

Lead is regulated by the EPA, SCDHEC and OSHA. The EPA and SCDHEC regulate lead use,

removal, and disposal, and OSHA regulates lead exposure to workers. The EPA defines LBP

as paint, varnish, stain, or other applied coating that contains lead equal to or greater than 1.0

mg/cm2, 5,000 mg/kg, or 0.5% by dry weight as determined by laboratory analysis. The

SCDHEC regulations require that painted demolition debris with a lead concentration greater

than 0.06% by weight be disposed in a permitted Class II landfill. For the purpose of the OSHA

lead standard, lead includes metallic lead, all inorganic lead compounds, and organic lead

soaps. A synopsis of the OSHA regulations (29 CFR 1926.62) and the applicability are as

follows:

The OSHA Interim Lead Standard for Construction (29 CFR 1926.62) applies to all construction

work where an employee may be occupationally exposed to lead. All work related to

construction, alteration, or repair (including painting and decorating) is included. The lead-in-

construction standard applies to any detectable concentration of lead in paint, as even small

concentrations of lead can result in unacceptable employee exposures depending upon on the

method of removal and other workplace conditions. Under this standard, construction includes,

but is not limited to, the following:

Demolition or salvage of structures where lead or materials containing lead are present

Removal or encapsulation of materials containing lead

New construction, alteration, repair, or renovation of structures, substrates, or portions

containing lead, or materials containing lead

Installation of products containing lead

Lead contamination/emergency clean-up

Transportation, disposal, storage, or containment of lead or materials containing lead on

the site or location at which construction activities are performed

Maintenance operations associated with construction activities described above



4.2 Sampling and Analytical Protocol

Mr. Partin of Terracon conducted the lead based paint (LBP) sampling on June 23, 2011. The

LBP sampling was conducted by collecting paint chip samples. The paint chip samples were

collected from painted or lacquered surfaces of building components likely to contain LBP,

based on apparent date of application. The paint samples were collected down to the surface

substrate so as to include any underlying paint systems in the analysis. The random paint chip

samples were selected based on current paint schemes and may not be inclusive of old paint

systems covered with paneling, or existing painted systems. The paint chip samples were

submitted to an ELAP approved laboratory for analysis of lead by NIOSH Method 7082M

(atomic absorption).

4.3 Sample Collection

Nine paint samples were collected from interior and exterior painted surfaces on the building.

Paint sampled included:

Light green interior

Grey interior

Grey exterior

Light blue interior

Black interior

Beige interior

White bathroom interior

Grey bathroom interior

Red interior

4.4 Findings and Recommendations

Lead was detected above the SCDHEC 0.06% regulatory limit in all of the samples collected

from the hangar. Lead concentrations ranged from 0.25% by weight to 12% by weight. If any of

the interior painted materials are to be removed during renovation activities, SCDHEC

regulations require that lead painted construction debris be disposed in a permitted Class II

landfill. Additionally, the provisions in the OSHA Standard for Lead (29 CFR 1926.62) should be

followed by contractor personnel conducting work activity during the demolition. A summary of

the lead paint laboratory results is presented in Table 2 in Appendix A. The analytical report is

included in Appendix B.

5.0 GENERAL COMMENTS

This survey was conducted in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily

exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the same

locale. The results, findings, conclusions and recommendations expressed in this report are

based on conditions observed during our survey of the building. The information contained in this

report is relevant to the date on which this survey was performed, and should not be relied upon



to represent conditions at a later date. This report has been prepared on behalf of and exclusively

for use by the Congaree Coalition and Richland County for specific application to their project as

discussed. This report is not a bidding document. Contractors or consultants reviewing this

report must draw their own conclusions regarding further investigation or remediation deemed

necessary. Terracon does not warrant the work of regulatory agencies, laboratories or other third

parties supplying information, which may have been used in the preparation of this report. No

warranty, express or implied is made.

APPENDIX A

TABLES

HA

Approx. Quantity

(ft2)Sample Number Description Sample Location Lab Result Category Condition

1.1 window glazing window 2% Chry Cat II Damaged1 500 1.2 window glazing window 2% Chry Cat II Damaged

1.3 window glazing window 2% Chry Cat II Damaged2.1 tar deck 3% Chry Cat I Damaged

2 40 2.2 tar deck 3% Chry Cat I Damaged2.3 tar deck 3% Chry Cat I Damaged3.1 felt, bottom window wall above deck 20% Chry Cat II Damaged

3 200 3.2 felt, bottom window wall above deck 20% Chry Cat II Damaged3.3 felt, bottom window wall above deck 20% Chry Cat II Damaged4.1 felt, top window wall above deck 30% Chry Cat II Damaged

4 200 4.2 felt, top window wall above deck 30% Chry Cat II Damaged4.3 felt, top window wall above deck 30% Chry Cat II Damaged5.1 corrugated insulating roof layer roof 30% Chry Cat II Damaged

5 8,450 5.2 corrugated insulating roof layer roof 30% Chry Cat II Damaged5.3 corrugated insulating roof layer roof 30% Chry Cat II Damaged6.1 roof flashing, around pipe roof 5% Chry Cat I Damaged

6 25 6.2 roof flashing, around pipe roof 5% Chry Cat I Damaged6.3 roof flashing, around pipe roof 5% Chry Cat I Damaged7.1 roof flashing, at roof/wall roof 10% Chry Cat I Damaged

7 100 7.2 roof flashing, at roof/wall roof 10% Chry Cat I Damaged7.3 roof flashing, at roof/wall roof 20% Chry Cat I Damaged

TABLE 1 - Asbestos Sample SummaryCurtiss-Wright Hangar

Columbia, South CarolinaProject No. 73117715


HA

Approx. Quantity





8.1 plaster, skim coat front room NAD SM Damaged

8.1 plaster, rough coat front room NAD SM Damaged8.2 plaster, skim coat middle room NAD SM Damaged8.2 plaster, rough coat middle room NAD SM Damaged8.3 plaster, skim coat middle room NAD SM Damaged8.3 plaster, rough coat middle room NAD SM Damaged

8 2,000 8.4 plaster, skim coat bathroom NAD SM Damaged8.4 plaster, rough coat bathroom NAD SM Damaged8.5 plaster, skim coat bathroom NAD SM Damaged8.5 plaster, rough coat bathroom NAD SM Damaged8.6 plaster, skim coat bathroom NAD SM Damaged8.6 plaster, rough coat bathroom NAD SM Damaged8.7 plaster, skim coat middle room NAD SM Damaged8.7 plaster, rough coat middle room NAD SM Damaged

9.1 wire insulation middle room NAD Misc Damaged

9 200 LF 9.2 wire insulation hangar NAD Misc Damaged9.3 wire insulation hangar NAD Misc Damaged

10.1 silver paint boiler room NAD Misc Damaged10 400 10.2 silver paint boiler room NAD Misc Damaged

10.3 silver paint boiler room NAD Misc Damaged

11.1 pipe insulation boiler room 80% Chry RACM Damaged11 20 11.2 pipe insulation boiler room 80% Chry RACM Damaged

11.3 pipe insulation boiler room 90% Chry RACM Damaged12.1 elbow insulation boiler room 50% Chry RACM Damaged

12 15 12.2 elbow insulation boiler room 50% Chry RACM Damaged12.3 elbow insulation boiler room 50% Chry RACM Damaged

HA

Approx. Quantity





13.1 9"x9" floor tile, black middle room 15% Chry Cat I Damaged13.1 mastic with above middle room 3% Chry Cat I Damaged

13 25 13.2 9"x9" floor tile, black middle room 15% Chry Cat I Damaged13.2 mastic with above middle room 3% Chry Cat I Damaged13.3 9"x9" floor tile, black middle room 15% Chry Cat I Damaged13.3 mastic with above middle room 3% Chry Cat I Damaged

14.1 9"x9" floor tile, white middle room 10% Chry Cat I Damaged

14.1 mastic with above middle room 2% Chry Cat I Damaged14 25 14.2 9"x9" floor tile, white middle room 10% Chry Cat I Damaged

14.2 mastic with above middle room 2% Chry Cat I Damaged14.3 9"x9" floor tile, white middle room 10% Chry Cat I Damaged14.3 mastic with above middle room 2% Chry Cat I Damaged

NotesHA Homogeneous Area

NAD No asbestos detectedPLM Polarized Light MicroscopySM Surfacing MaterialTSI Thermal System InsulationMisc Miscellaneous Material

F FriableNF Non-Friable

Chry Chrysotile asbestosCat I asbestos containing packings, gaskets, asphaltic roofing products, resilient flooring, pliable sealants and pliable masticsCat II non friable materials other than Category IRACM Regulated Asbestos Containing Material

Sample Number Description Location Lab Result

LP-1 light green interior 6.8%LP-2 grey exterior 8%LP-3 grey interior 12%LP-4 light blue interior 1.5%LP-5 black interior 4.1%LP-6 beige interior 0.25%LP-7 white bathroom 0.81%LP-8 grey bathroom 3%LP-9 red interior 3.3%

Note:Results in boldface indicate concentration above the SCDHEC regulatory limit (0.06%)Painted construction debris should be disposed in a Class II Landfill


TABLE 2 - Lead Paint Sample SummaryCurtiss-Wright Hangar


APPENDIX B

LABORATORY REPORTS

Sample Description Appearance % Type

AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using

Polarized Light Microscopy

411102029

Attn: Gene Partin


521 Clemson Road

Columbia, SC 29229

Customer PO:

Received: 06/24/11 10:00 AM

Curtis-Wright Hangar

Customer ID: GAGE62

Fax: (803) 741-9900 Phone: (803) 741-9000

Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:

6/28/2011Analysis Date:

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

4335 Stuart Andrew Blvd, Suite 101, Charlotte, NC 28217

Phone: (704) 525-2205 Fax: (704) 525-2382 Email: [email protected]

1.1

411102029-0001

window glazing Gray/Tan

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Chrysotile2%Fibrous (other)2% Non-fibrous (other)96%

1.2

411102029-0002


Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous


1.3

411102029-0003


Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous


2.1

411102029-0004

tar on deck Black

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Chrysotile3%Cellulose20% Non-fibrous (other)77%

2.2

411102029-0005

tar on deck Black

Fibrous

Heterogeneous


2.3

411102029-0006

tar on deck Black

Fibrous

Heterogeneous


1

Lee Plumley, Laboratory Manager

or other approved signatory

Analyst(s)

Test Report PLM-7.23.0 Printed: 6/28/2011 11:39:50 AM

EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Charlotte, NC NVLAP Lab Code 200841-0, VA 3333 00312, WV LT000325

Christopher Estes (40)Kyle Collins (19)

Initial report from 06/28/2011 11:39:50

mailto:[email protected]






411102029

Attn: Gene Partin


521 Clemson Road

Columbia, SC 29229

Customer PO:

Received: 06/24/11 10:00 AM


Customer ID: GAGE62

Fax: (803) 741-9900 Phone: (803) 741-9000

Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:





3.1

411102029-0007

felt bottom of

windows

Brown/Black

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Chrysotile20%Non-fibrous (other)80%

3.2

411102029-0008

felt bottom of

windows

Brown/Black

Fibrous

Heterogeneous


3.3

411102029-0009

felt bottom of

windows

Brown/Black

Fibrous

Heterogeneous


4.1

411102029-0010

felt top of windows Black

Fibrous

Heterogeneous


4.2

411102029-0011


Fibrous

Heterogeneous


4.3

411102029-0012


Fibrous

Heterogeneous


2



Analyst(s)












411102029

Attn: Gene Partin


521 Clemson Road

Columbia, SC 29229

Customer PO:

Received: 06/24/11 10:00 AM


Customer ID: GAGE62

Fax: (803) 741-9900 Phone: (803) 741-9000

Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:





5.1

411102029-0013

felt layer under

metal roof

Brown/Black

Fibrous

Heterogeneous


5.2

411102029-0014

felt layer under

metal roof

Brown/Black

Fibrous

Heterogeneous


5.3

411102029-0015

felt layer under

metal roof

Black

Fibrous

Heterogeneous


6.1

411102029-0016

roof flashing

around pipe

Black

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous


6.2

411102029-0017

roof flashing

around pipe

Black

Fibrous

Heterogeneous


6.3

411102029-0018

roof flashing

around pipe

Black

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous


3



Analyst(s)












411102029

Attn: Gene Partin


521 Clemson Road

Columbia, SC 29229

Customer PO:

Received: 06/24/11 10:00 AM


Customer ID: GAGE62

Fax: (803) 741-9900 Phone: (803) 741-9000

Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:





7.1

411102029-0019

roof flashing at

roof/wall

Black

Fibrous

Heterogeneous


7.2

411102029-0020

roof flashing at

roof/wall

Brown

Fibrous

Heterogeneous


7.3

411102029-0021

roof flashing at

roof/wall

Black

Fibrous

Heterogeneous


8.1-Skim Coat

411102029-0022

plaster/skim coat White None Detected

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

8.1-Rough Coat

411102029-0022A

plaster/skim coat Tan None Detected

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous


8.2-Skim Coat

411102029-0023


Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous


4



Analyst(s)












411102029

Attn: Gene Partin


521 Clemson Road

Columbia, SC 29229

Customer PO:

Received: 06/24/11 10:00 AM


Customer ID: GAGE62

Fax: (803) 741-9900 Phone: (803) 741-9000

Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:





8.2-Rough Coat

411102029-0023A


Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous


8.3-Skim Coat

411102029-0024


Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous


8.3-Rough Coat

411102029-0024A


Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous


8.4-Skim Coat

411102029-0025


Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous


8.4-Rough Coat

411102029-0025A


Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous


8.5-Skim Coat

411102029-0026


Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous


5



Analyst(s)












411102029

Attn: Gene Partin


521 Clemson Road

Columbia, SC 29229

Customer PO:

Received: 06/24/11 10:00 AM


Customer ID: GAGE62

Fax: (803) 741-9900 Phone: (803) 741-9000

Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:





8.5-Rough Coat

411102029-0026A


Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous


8.6-Skim Coat

411102029-0027


Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous


8.6-Rough Coat

411102029-0027A


Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous


8.7-Skim Coat

411102029-0028


Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous


8.7-Rough Coat

411102029-0028A


Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous


9.1

411102029-0029

wire insulation Brown/Tan None Detected

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Cellulose50%

Glass30%


6



Analyst(s)












411102029

Attn: Gene Partin


521 Clemson Road

Columbia, SC 29229

Customer PO:

Received: 06/24/11 10:00 AM


Customer ID: GAGE62

Fax: (803) 741-9900 Phone: (803) 741-9000

Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:





9.2

411102029-0030

wire insulation Brown/Tan None Detected

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Cellulose50%

Glass30%


9.3

411102029-0031

wire insulation Brown None Detected

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Cellulose50%

Glass30%


10.1

411102029-0032

silver paint boiler

room

Silver None Detected

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous


10.2

411102029-0033

silver paint boiler

room


Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous


10.3

411102029-0034

silver paint boiler

room


Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous


11.1

411102029-0035

pipe insulation Gray

Fibrous

Heterogeneous


7



Analyst(s)












411102029

Attn: Gene Partin


521 Clemson Road

Columbia, SC 29229

Customer PO:

Received: 06/24/11 10:00 AM


Customer ID: GAGE62

Fax: (803) 741-9900 Phone: (803) 741-9000

Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:





11.2

411102029-0036


Fibrous

Heterogeneous


11.3

411102029-0037


Fibrous

Heterogeneous


12.1

411102029-0038

elbow insulation Gray

Fibrous

Heterogeneous


12.2

411102029-0039


Fibrous

Heterogeneous


12.3

411102029-0040


Fibrous

Heterogeneous


13.1-Floor Tile

411102029-0041

black 9x9 floor tile Brown

Fibrous

Heterogeneous


8



Analyst(s)












411102029

Attn: Gene Partin


521 Clemson Road

Columbia, SC 29229

Customer PO:

Received: 06/24/11 10:00 AM


Customer ID: GAGE62

Fax: (803) 741-9900 Phone: (803) 741-9000

Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:





13.1-Mastic

411102029-0041A

black 9x9 floor tile Black

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous


13.2-Floor Tile

411102029-0042


Fibrous

Heterogeneous


13.2-Mastic

411102029-0042A


Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous


13.3-Floor Tile

411102029-0043


Fibrous

Heterogeneous


13.3-Mastic

411102029-0043A


Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous


14.1-Floor Tile

411102029-0044

white 9x9 floor tile Brown

Fibrous

Heterogeneous


9



Analyst(s)












411102029

Attn: Gene Partin


521 Clemson Road

Columbia, SC 29229

Customer PO:

Received: 06/24/11 10:00 AM


Customer ID: GAGE62

Fax: (803) 741-9900 Phone: (803) 741-9000

Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:





14.1-Mastic

411102029-0044A

white 9x9 floor tile Black

Fibrous

Heterogeneous


14.2-Floor Tile

411102029-0045

white 9x9 floor tile Brown

Fibrous

Heterogeneous


14.2-Mastic

411102029-0045A

white 9x9 floor tile Black

Fibrous

Heterogeneous


14.3-Floor Tile

411102029-0046

Tan

Fibrous

Heterogeneous


14.3-Mastic

411102029-0046A

Black

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous


10



Analyst(s)

THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT.Test Report PLM-7.23.0 Printed: 6/28/2011 11:39:50 AM






Client Sample Description ConcentrationLab ID AnalyzedLead

Collected


706 Gralin Street, Kernersville, NC 27284


021103838

Attn: Gene Partin


521 Clemson Road

Columbia, SC 29229

Customer PO:

Received: 06/27/11 9:30 AM

Curtis-Wright Hanger

Customer ID: GAGE62

Fax: (803) 741-9900 Phone: (803) 741-9000

Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:

Test Report: Lead in Paint Chips by Flame AAS (SW 846 3050B*/7000B)

0001LP-1 6.8 % wt6/28/2011

0002LP-2 8.0 % wt6/28/2011

0003LP-3 12 % wt6/28/2011

0004LP-4 1.5 % wt6/28/2011

0005LP-5 4.1 % wt6/28/2011

0006LP-6 0.25 % wt6/28/2011

0007LP-7 0.81 % wt6/28/2011

0008LP-8 3.0 % wt6/28/2011

0009LP-9 3.3 % wt6/28/2011

Page 1 of 1

James Cole, Laboratory Manager


Test Report ChmSnglePrm/nQC-7.21.0 Printed: 6/28/2011 4:24:52 PM

Reporting limit is 0.01 % wt. The QC data associated with these results included in this report meet the method QC requirements, unless specifically indicated otherwise. Unless noted, results in this report are not blank corrected. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. * slight modifications to methods applied.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Kernersville, NC AIHA-LAP, LLC--ELLAP Lab 102564



APPENDIX C

INSPECTOR’S CREDENTIALS

APPENDIX D

PHOTO DOCUMENTATION

Curtiss-Wright Hangar Project No. 73117715 Photos Taken: June 23, 2011 Terracon

Photo #1 View of the hangar exterior Photo #2 View of the hangar interior

Photo #3 View of the east wing front room

with plaster on walls Photo #4 View of the east wing middle room

with tile (floor near plywood)

Photo #5 View of the east wing bathroom Photo #6 View of the roof of the east wing

Curtiss-Wright Hangar Project No. 73117715 Photos Taken: June 23, 2011 Terracon

Photo #7 View of the hangar roof Photo #8 Close up view of hangar roof

showing corrugated layer and flashing strip at top of window

Photo #9 View of the boiler with pipe

insulation Photo #10 View of the coal storage room and

chute

Photo #11 View of the hanger exterior

showing windows Photo #12 View of sliding metal door on

hangar’s north side

Form 111—6/98

asbestos & lead paint survey report · asbestos & lead paint survey report curtiss-wright...

Documents