archives and archival organization in southern germany from the early 19th century until world war...
Upload: abteilung-kulturelles-erbe-stadtarchiv-museen-gedenkstaetten-speyer
Post on 10-May-2015
1.349 views
DESCRIPTION
Vortrag "Archives and archival organization in southern Germany from the early 19th century until World War I. The example of Bavaria", Pisa 16.9. 2011 (Konferenz "L'unita d'Italia e gli archivi", SNS Pisa 15.-16.9. 2011TRANSCRIPT
1
Archives and archival organization in southern Germany from the early 19th
century until World War I. The example of Bavaria
Pisa, 16.9.2011; Joachim Kemper (Speyer, Germany)
1.Introduction: Southern Germany (19th century)
2.The archival “landscape” in Bavaria:
Organization, principles and archival buildings
3.Instead of a summary: Historical research
and archives in Bavaria
2
1. Introduction: Southern Germany (19th century)
Archives are very traditional institutions (long history,
tradition).
Especially the turn of the 18th to 19th century has
brought to the (from today's perspective) "southern"
german regions and states large changes. The impact
on the role of archives and their organization and work
was significant.
In the center of attention stays Bavaria, the most
important of the southern german states.
3
1. Introduction: Southern Germany (19th century)
State development in the time of “German
Confederation” (1815-1866 = “Deutscher Bund”) was
still open and not foreseeable . Build up: Ca. 39
states/free cities; Prussia and Austria (in parts), small
and medium-sized states (Bavaria, Baden,
Württemberg, Hannover etc.).
„German War“ (1866): „Lesser german solution“,
dominance of Prussia in the new empire (1871).
4
1. Introduction: Southern Germany (19th century)File: Wikimedia commons
5
1. Introduction: Southern Germany (19th century)
Nevertheless: the archival management remained in the new
empire a business of the single states.
Bavaria was the major state of the empire apart from Prussia;
with special role – also in archivistics (up to our times, for
instance: Bavarian Archives School, since 1821). Bavaria is
also in the focus, because there we have a very high and
sophisticated number of state archives. Bavaria had at the
beginning of the 19th Century to deal with the tradition of
many newly added territories and monasteries etc. A very
centralized and very strong on pertinence-principle based
archival management was established.
6
2. The archival “landscape” in Bavaria: Organization, principles and archival buildings
Bavaria was at the beginning of the 19th Century one of
the big winners of the territorial and political changes of
the Napoleonic era. In 1806 the kingdom of Bavaria was
founded.
Unlike today, there was not only the state located in the
southeast of Germany, but also (since 1816) a county
left to the Rhine, leading directly to France: the "Rhine
Palatinate" with its capital Speyer.
7
2. The archival “landscape” in Bavaria: Organization, principles and archival buildings
All in all, the basic changes around (1800ff.)/1806/1816
brought a significant change in the archival live, and
not just in terms of their legal status. The documents of
secularized dioceses or monasteries were transferred to
the state, their acquisition or disposal had to be
organized.
A look at the central archives in Munich will be important
to classify the prevailing principles and methods!
8
2. The archival “landscape” in Bavaria: Organization, principles and archival buildings
Archival Reorganization of 1799: Three central archives
were divided due to local, state and regional matters on
the principle of pertinence. The various provinces
should still have further additional provincial archives.
1812: Attempt to build a single national archive for the
entire kingdom (“all other archives will exist no
longer”). Centralization in the strictest form of selection
to Munich, especially all charters, selected manuscripts
and “the most interesting” records.
9
2. The archival “landscape” in Bavaria: Organization, principles and archival buildings
While the real centralization could only be in parts
executed, the theoretical centralization in Munich was
postulated for a long time!
1820: Existence of regional archives assured.
From 1837: Organizational continuity of the Bavarian
state archives until now. National archives Munich and
state archives („Kreisarchive“): Amberg, Bamberg,
Landshut, Munich, Neuburg, Nürnberg, Speyer and
Würzburg.
10
2. The archival “landscape” in Bavaria: Organization, principles and archival buildings
Strange from today's perspective appear the criteria by which a
distinction was made between the “quality” of archives (e.g.
charters).
Some misunderstandings and disputes started between the
archive due to the different interpretation of principles;
question of archival responsibility (e.g. Neuburg).
Since the 1920 provenance became temporary important, but
not until the 1960s the revision of stocks and the exchange of
stocks between the state archives was the declared primary
task of all state archives in Bavaria.
11
2. The archival “landscape” in Bavaria: Organization, principles and archival buildings
Organization, turning point 1921: The “Kreisarchive” were
renamed in “Staatsarchive”, which is still valid today.
The Bavarian Main state archives (“Bayerisches
Hauptstaatsarchiv”) still exists also from 1921, it was
consolidated from the former Bavarian Central State
Archives together with the "Secret State Archives”
(under the Bavarian Ministry of Foreign Affairs) and the
Secret House Archive in Munich. New chief-archivist of
the whole archival administration was the General
director.
12
2. The archival “landscape” in Bavaria: Organization, principles and archival buildings
Organization, turning point 1921: The „Secret House
Archive” is since 1923 property of the "Wittelsbach
Compensation Fund". It is also part of the Bavarian
Main state archives, but the concession to do research
in this archive is tied to the approval of the House of
Wittelsbach. Another special role played for many years
the Bavarian Military archive (“Kriegsarchiv”). It was
incorporated after WW II in the Main state archives.
13
2. The archival “landscape” in Bavaria: Organization, principles and archival buildings
Organization, turning point 1921: In parallel to this
external reorganization, the new general director
Riedner planned an internal change (based on
provenance): “a better distribution of the records, the
elimination of fragmented records, in short the revision
and the exchange of stocks”. There should be a
"reliable archive topography". But the attempts were
mostly in vain ...
14
2. The archival “landscape” in Bavaria: Organization, principles and archival buildings
The consolidated archival organization (1837/1921) in
Bavaria was broken until our times only in two cases
(acquisition of Coburg, 1920; Speyer/Rhine-Palatinate,
1946 dropped away).
15
2. The archival “landscape” in Bavaria: Organization, principles and archival buildings
New archival buildings (between 1871 and WW I):
• Prussia: pioneer in constructing “modern” archival
buildings (two parts, administration and depots);
average Prussian State archives in the provinces of the
state occurs as a brick-lined functional-building.
• In Bavaria and in other "smaller" states of the empire
we can generally also assume a certain amount of new
buildings with seemingly greater need for
“representation”.
16
2. The archival “landscape” in Bavaria: Organization, principles and archival buildings
New archival buildings (between 1871 and WW I):
• Bavaria: Since 1877 some new buildings, like in Amberg, Speyer,
Munich and Bamberg – but the Prussian example (the modern
division of archives in two parts) was seen with some retention.
• Example Staatsarchiv Bamberg (1902/1905): Especially in the case
of the new and very representative archive of Bamberg, the
Bavarian archivists consciously decided against the "foreign"
Prussian “style” and created an backwards-archive-design: Three-
blade “castle” with closed administrative building and a kind of
neo-baroque garden in the courtyard; the magazine: cabinet-
system (with many separated cabinets, chambers or single rooms).
17
2. The archival “landscape” in Bavaria: Organization, principles and archival buildings
18
2. The archival “landscape” in Bavaria: Organization, principles and archival buildings
19
2. The archival “landscape” in Bavaria: Organization, principles and archival buildings
20
3. Instead of a summary: Historical research and archives in Bavaria
Archival and institutional continuity in Bavaria ↔ Archives
and archival holdings have been torn apart due to the
principle of pertinence, or even because of the principle
of value…
Although the principle of provenance is since decades in
Bavaria ruling, the revision of stocks and the exchange
of stocks between the state archives make some
difficulties.
21
3. Instead of a summary: Historical research and archives in Bavaria
And: A changeful history conducts a serious dissemination of
records.
Example: Rhine-Palatinate („Bayerische Pfalz“, „Rheinpfalz“,
1816-1946 Bavarian; capital: Speyer), fragmented in former
times in many territories and states. The modern state
archives Speyer has at most fragmented archival holdings of
the previous dominions. The only archive, that rans
continuously through the year 1800, is the archive of the
former imperial city of Speyer; our tradition is still
undisturbed.
22
3. Instead of a summary: Historical research and archives in Bavaria (Map Rhine-Palatinate, 1789, http://www.hoeckmann.de/deutschland/pfalz.htm)
23
3. Instead of a summary: Historical research and archives in Bavaria
The archival holdings are mostly not in the region; they
are in fact in archives like Munich or Karlsruhe or
elsewhere.
Reasons e.g.: Principle of archival following
(“Archivfolge”), migration of families (and archives),
archival (didactical) collections.
A reconstruction of the Palatine archives in the region
itself, a return, has been postulated many times, but it
is impossible.
24
3. Instead of a summary: Historical research and archives in Bavaria
Solutions to the problem: Deposita (e.g. records of the
„Reichskammergericht“, from Munich to Speyer; a
solution also for the thousands of „Palatine“ charters in
Munich?); virtual reconstruction through digitization or
at least through (cross-border-) finding-aids?
25
3. Instead of a summary: Historical research and archives in Bavaria
Conclusion
and
“Grazie”!