archaeology at hanging heaton 2014archaeology at hanging heaton 2014 an education project in the...
TRANSCRIPT
ARCHAEOLOGY AT HANGING HEATON
2014 An education project in the grounds of Hanging Heaton CE (VC) J&I
School (West Yorkshire, UK)
Text and photographs by Dave Weldrake
ARCHAEOLOGY AT HANGING HEATON 2014 An education project in the grounds of Hanging Heaton CE (VC) J&I School (West
Yorkshire, UK)
Images and text © Dave Weldrake 2015
Website: http://daveweldrake.wordpress.com/
ARCHAEOLOGY AT HANGING HEATON 2014
An education project in the grounds of Hanging Heaton CE (VC J&I School (West
Yorkshire, UK)
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Aims and Objectives
2.1 Archaeological
2.2 Educational
3.0 Location
4.0 Historical Background
5.0 Archaeological Background
6.0 Archaeological Results
7.0 The Finds
8.0 Discussion and Interpretation
9.0 Educational Outcomes
10.0 Potential for further work
11.0 Conclusions
12.0 References
Appendix 1 The images
A r c h a e o l o g y a t H a n g i n g H e a t o n 2 0 1 4 | 1
Dave Weldrake: Heritage Education http://daveweldrake.wordpress.com/
ARCHAEOLOGY AT HANGING HEATON 2014
An education project in the grounds of Hanging Heaton CE VC J&I School (West
Yorkshire, UK)
1.0 Introduction
The project was commissioned by S. Coney on behalf of Hanging Heaton CE (VC) J&I
School and took place during the week beginning on the 3rd
of November 2014. The project
was led by Dave Weldrake.
2.0 Aims and Objectives
The aims of the investigation were twofold:
2.1 Archaeological
To investigate the potential for archaeological survival within the school grounds
2.2 Educational
To provide children throughout the school with a basic understanding of the principles of
archaeology
3.0 Location
The site was located at SE 258 232.
4.0 Historical Background
Though the first mention of Hanging Heaton occurs in the Domesday Survey of 1086, the
settlement is arguably much older. The Heton element of the place name is derived from the
Anglo-Saxon and means ‘high farm’. The Hanging element of the place name seems to have
been added in the 13th
century (HGEPN n. d.) presumably to distinguish the settlement from
the nearby village of Earlsheaton. The two settlements were later amalgamated to from the
manor of Soothill (Faull and Moorhouse p. 510-11)
There is little that can be said about Hanging Heaton in the medieval and Tudor periods. A
deed of 1498 or 1490 mentions several messuages (parcels of land and any associated
buildings), a miln (a mill, probably a corn mill) and a spring wood or coppice (Brown 1909 p.
88). However the first 6 inch to the mile Ordnance Survey map of 1854 (accessed through the
National Library of Scotland map archive) shows rows of long thin fields both to the north
and south of the village. These probably represent the ‘fossilized’ remains of the medieval
open fields. These were ploughed in such a way as to create ridge and furrow and when the
land was enclosed ridges would be put together to make the long thin fields seem on the map.
There was no church at the time. The present St. Paul’s church was built in the early 19th
century and is one of the ‘million churches’ (so called because the government gave a grant
of a million pounds for their construction, not because there were a million of them) which
were erected to mark Wellington’s victory at the Battle of Waterloo. (Crabb n. d.). The only
building in Hanging Heaton which may date, at least in part, to the late medieval period is
Grove Farm which has timber framing dating to the 16th
century (WYAAS 1).
The 1854 O. S. map shows a cluster of small houses and farms, some of which still remain
today. There is little sign of industry except for a couple of fields marked as tenters (wooden
frames on which cloth was stretched after fulling to prevent it from shrinking (hence the
A r c h a e o l o g y a t H a n g i n g H e a t o n 2 0 1 4 | 2
Dave Weldrake: Heritage Education http://daveweldrake.wordpress.com/
modern phrase ‘on tenterhooks’ – feeling stretched or strained) and the sandstone quarry in
which the school now stands. This has disappeared by 1895 when the next map was
published.
5.0 The Archaeological Background
A search of the West Yorkshire Heritage Environment Record (a database of all known
archaeological sites and find spots) via Heritage Gateway has revealed no archaeological
activity in the immediate area.
6.0 Archaeological results
A 6.0 x 1.0 metre trench was excavated by hand to a maximum depth of 20.0 cm. The
material removed consisted of a mixture of patches of clay, soil and gravel. These seemed to
have been dumped randomly with no consistent stratification across the site. No natural soil
layer was identified. (See Appendix 1: Image 1)
7.0 The finds Finds from the site were extremely numerous (Weldrake 2014a). These included the usual
19th
/20th
century pottery, fragments of clay pipe, vessel and window glass, a couple of 2
pence coins, marbles, a ceramic doorknob, and an oyster shell. Only selected examples are
discussed in detail below:
7.1 Pottery (See Appendix 1: Images 2- 4)
7.1.1 Whiteware. This form of pottery became popular in the 1830s when it began to replace the earlier pearl
and creamwares such as those made by the Leeds potteries. The fragments represent plates,
saucers and other table ware. The vessels are machine-made and mass-produced. Similar
vessels are in use today.
7.1.2 Transfer-glazed ware. Another 19
th/20
th century mass-produced machine-made product in which a complex pattern
is drawn out and glued to the surface of a plate or other vessel. This can then be sealed in
place by the glaze. The process enables the mass-production of complex designs at a
relatively low cost. The most popular design was the Willow Pattern, designed originally for
the Minton potteries in the late 1700s. However, cheap copies quickly became popular and
the characteristic blue and white design is easily distinguished even in the fragmentary form
on which it was found on site. (See image 2.) The European fascination with Oriental art
and design is also demonstrated by three sherds bearing a blue-and-white leaf-patterned
design (Weldrake 2014b). (See Image 3.)
7.1.3 Brown-glazed wares. The tradition of making hard-fired pots with a dark glaze goes back into at least the 1500s,
Moorhouse and Roberts 1992) though the fragments recovered from the site are likely to be
of a much later date. This is the case with the fragments of tea pot recovered from the site.
(See Image 4.)
7.1.4 Clay Tobacco Pipes (Appendix 1 Images 5 – 7)
11 sections of pipe stem were recovered and 6 fragments of bowl. Two of the bowls bear a
distinctive leaf pattern around the base with swags around the rim. Each has what are
probably the maker’s initials (ID) on either side. It has not been possible to identify the maker
A r c h a e o l o g y a t H a n g i n g H e a t o n 2 0 1 4 | 3
Dave Weldrake: Heritage Education http://daveweldrake.wordpress.com/
but the factory may well be local as a similar bowl was brought in by one of the children as a
garden find (Appendix 1: Image 6) and a further example was found by a member of the
Leeds Young Archaeologists Club in a garden in Midfield. (LYAC 2015: I am indebted to
Louse Martin for drawing my attention to this).
8.0 Discussion and interpretation
Apart from what may have been recent surface losses the majority of the finds recovered
from the site were fragmentary in nature and seem not to be associated with any given
feature. This might suggest that they result from the infilling of the disused quarry in which
the school is situated. To be consistent with the map evidence this would suggest a late 19th
or early 20th
century date for the deposition of the finds.
9.0 Educational Outcomes (See front cover and Images 8)
The children from each year group responded enthusiastically to the tasks they were given
and worked steadily at each, their level of commitment being amply demonstrated on the
front cover and in Image 8. This made it easy for the children to learn and they will now have
a good understanding of how archaeology works and the kind of evidence which it produces.
10.0 Potential for further work The strictly archaeological potential for the school grounds would seem to be limited. If we
take the map evidence and the finds from the site together it seems unlikely that there are
buried structural remains in the area adjacent to the excavation.
In educational terms there is some the potential for further work. Whilst it is unlikely that a
trench excavated in another area of the school grounds would reveal any major buried
structures pre-dating the school, it seems likely that more finds would be recovered. Other
classes could therefore enjoy the experience which the children had in 2014.
11.0 Conclusions The archaeological project at Hanging Heaton has confirmed the value of practical
experience as a learning tool. It has given the children a basic understanding of the way
archaeology works and provided them with an experience about which they will talk for a
long time.
A r c h a e o l o g y a t H a n g i n g H e a t o n 2 0 1 4 | 4
Dave Weldrake: Heritage Education http://daveweldrake.wordpress.com/
12.0 References
Brown, W. (Ed.) 1909
(reprinted
2013)
Yorkshire Deeds: Volume 1 Cambridge University Press
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=YlHpGU3I7KIC&pg=PA87&lpg=PA87&dq=Hyngyng+Heton&source=bl&ots=0fLsy_IkTT&sig=FcI9rFVpg392BetEmDq
c0foSNjg&hl=en&sa=X&ei=giEcVaLfEfKp7Aa62ICgDw&ved=0CCMQ6AEw
AA#v=onepage&q=Hyngyng%20Heton&f=false
Crabb, P. n. d. St Paul's Church History (Or how we came to be)
http://stpaulch.co.uk/HISTORY.php Last visited March 2015
HGEPN n. d. Hanging Heaton Historical Gazetteer of England’s Place Names
http://www.placenames.org.uk/browse/mads/epns-deep-31-c-mappedname-
002093 Last visited March 2015
Faull, M. L, and
Moorhouse, S. A. (Eds)
1981 West Yorkshire: An Archaeological Survey to A.D.
1500
West Yorkshire Metropolitan County Council
Faull, M. L. and Stinson,
M
1986 Domesday Book: Yorkshire
Phillimore, Chichester
Heritage Gateway n. d. http://www.heritagegateway.org.uk/gateway/
Last visited March 2015
LYAC 2015 Leeds Young Archaeologists Club Facebook: 21
March 2015 https://www.facebook.com/yac.leeds/posts/408821229243008
Last visited July 2015
Moorhouse, S. A. and
Roberts, I. 1992 Wrenthorpe Potteries: Excavations of 16th and 17th-
century Potting Tenements Near Wakefield, 1983-86
West Yorkshire Archaeology Service
National Library of
Scotland
n.d. Ordnance Survey Maps - Six-inch England and
Wales, 1842-1952 http://maps.nls.uk/os/6inch-england-and-wales/
Last visited March 2015
Weldrake, D. 2014a Archaeology at hanging Heaton https://daveweldrake.wordpress.com/2014/11/05/archaeology-at-hanging-heaton/
Last visited April 2015 Weldrake, D. 2014b Archaeology at Hanging Heaton 2
https://daveweldrake.wordpress.com/2014/11/
Last visited April 2015
A r c h a e o l o g y a t H a n g i n g H e a t o n 2 0 1 4 | 5
Dave Weldrake: Heritage Education http://daveweldrake.wordpress.com/
Appendix 1: Images
Image 1: The site looking south The photograph gives a good impression of the kind of material removed from the site, a
mixture of dumped soil, clays and gravel with fragments of sandstone. A 1.0 metre ranging
rod has been used as a scale.
A r c h a e o l o g y a t H a n g i n g H e a t o n 2 0 1 4 | 6
Dave Weldrake: Heritage Education http://daveweldrake.wordpress.com/
Image 2: Transfer-glazed ware This small fragment of transfer-glazed ware bears the distinctive pattern of the border of the
willow pattern plate, though it is probably of no great antiquity. 5.0 centimetre scale.
A r c h a e o l o g y a t H a n g i n g H e a t o n 2 0 1 4 | 7
Dave Weldrake: Heritage Education http://daveweldrake.wordpress.com/
Image 3: Three sherds from the same pot A further example of transfer-glazed ware, probably early 20
th century. When considered in
conjunction with the sherd illustrated in Image 2, these fragments demonstrate the continuing
European interest in Oriental art and design. 5.0 cm scale.
A r c h a e o l o g y a t H a n g i n g H e a t o n 2 0 1 4 | 8
Dave Weldrake: Heritage Education http://daveweldrake.wordpress.com/
Image 4: Brown-glazed teapot The brown glaze of this teapot is typical of many early 20
th century specimens. However the
intricate leaf pattern suggests that it may have been conceived of as special occasion
tableware, rather than everyday domestic pottery. 5.0 cm scale.
A r c h a e o l o g y a t H a n g i n g H e a t o n 2 0 1 4 | 9
Dave Weldrake: Heritage Education http://daveweldrake.wordpress.com/
Image 5: Fragments of clay tobacco pipe recovered from the excavation
5.0 cm scale
A r c h a e o l o g y a t H a n g i n g H e a t o n 2 0 1 4 | 10
Dave Weldrake: Heritage Education http://daveweldrake.wordpress.com/
Image 6: Two fragments of clay tobacco pipe bowl
The example on the left clearly shows the D of the maker’s mark.
5.0 cm scale.
A r c h a e o l o g y a t H a n g i n g H e a t o n 2 0 1 4 | 11
Dave Weldrake: Heritage Education http://daveweldrake.wordpress.com/
Image 7: Bowl of clay tobacco pipe brought in as garden find
This pipe bowl was brought in by a pupil as a garden find. It has the same design as a least
one of the bowls recovered from the excavation. This would suggest a fairly local origin for
both items.
A r c h a e o l o g y a t H a n g i n g H e a t o n 2 0 1 4 | 12
Dave Weldrake: Heritage Education http://daveweldrake.wordpress.com/
Image 8; Working on a simulated excavation
These children are carrying out a simulated excavation where ‘finds’ have been buried in
sterile cat litter. This helps prepare the children for the real task outdoors.