apca us agricultural policy and trade: the china connection daryll e. ray & harwood schaffer...

46
A A P P C C A A US Agricultural Policy US Agricultural Policy and Trade: and Trade: The China Connection The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center Rural Development Institute Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Beijing, China June 3, 2008

Post on 19-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

US Agricultural Policy and US Agricultural Policy and Trade: Trade:

The China ConnectionThe China ConnectionDaryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer

University of TennesseeAgricultural Policy Analysis Center

Rural Development InstituteChinese Academy of Social Sciences

Beijing, China • June 3, 2008

Page 2: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

Recent U.S. Corn PricesRecent U.S. Corn Prices

$1.00

$2.00

$3.00

$4.00

$5.00

$6.00

$7.00

2005 2005-07 2006 2006-07 2007 2007-07 2008

Page 3: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

What are the Most What are the Most Often Stated Triggers?Often Stated Triggers?

• Ethanol– US corn-based ethanol production is

booming– Federal mandates for biofuels

• Increasing meat consumption in China– Middle class shift from grain-based to

meat-based diets

Page 4: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

Expected U.S. Ethanol Expected U.S. Ethanol DemandDemand

Source: UDSA Baseline Projections to 2017

Page 5: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

We Have Seen This BeforeWe Have Seen This Before

$0.00

$1.00

$2.00

$3.00

$4.00

$5.00

$6.00

$7.00

1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

7-74 $3.907

5

7-72 $1.267

5

10-05 $1.962

5

4-08 $6.26

Page 6: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

What Were the Triggers Then?What Were the Triggers Then?• Russian grain imports

– Crop failure– Decision not to liquidate cattle herds

• Petrodollar driven exports– Loans to developing countries– Used to import food to feed people

Page 7: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

Laying the Blame: Then & NowLaying the Blame: Then & Now• Then

– Food vs. feed—Western grain-based-meat diets

– Eat less meat so the poor of the world can have grain to eat

• Now– Food vs. fuel—US ethanol mandates– Eliminate grain-based biofuels to the

poor or the world can have grain to eat

Page 8: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

Looking More CloselyLooking More Closely• Low price regimen

• Reduced world-wide grain stocks

• Increased demand for meat in China – But has this put significant upward

pressure on international grain prices?

Page 9: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

Looking More CloselyLooking More Closely• Low price regimen

– US farm program design suppressed prices

– Leaving little incentive to invest and expand production

• It has often been said:– World consumption of grains has

exceeded production in 7 of the last 8 years

Page 10: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

Looking More CloselyLooking More Closely• Dismantling of government stocks

– Expectation that commercials would hold any needed stocks

– Concerns about cost of government stocks programs

– Stocks discouraged by trade policies that put decisions in the hands of markets

• Random weather events– Australia and Ukraine

Page 11: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

World Ending-Year StocksWorld Ending-Year Stocks

World Grains: Ending Crop Year Stock Levels

Source: USDA PS&D

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

Mil

lio

n M

etri

c T

on

s

World

Page 12: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

World Grain StocksWorld Grain Stocks

All Grains: Ending Crop Year Stock Levels

Source: USDA PS&D

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

Mil

lio

n M

etri

c T

on

s

China

World

Page 13: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

World Grain StocksWorld Grain Stocks

All Grains: Ending Crop Year Stock Levels

Source: USDA PS&D

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

Mil

lio

n M

etri

c T

on

s

China

US

World

Page 14: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

World Grain StocksWorld Grain Stocks

All Grains: World less China and the US, Ending Crop Year Stock LevelsSource: USDA PS&D

0

50

100

150

200

250

1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

Mil

lio

n T

on

nes

Page 15: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

Looking More CloselyLooking More Closely• Low price regimen

• Reduced world-wide grain stocks

• Increased demand for meat in China – But has this put significant upward

pressure on international grain prices?

Page 16: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

China MeatChina Meat

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

Mil

lio

n M

etri

c T

on

sProduction

Consumption

Production and Consumption of Beef, Pork, and Broilers

Source: USDA PS&D

Page 17: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

China GrainsChina Grains

Grains: Production and Consumption

Source: USDA PS&D

300

310

320

330

340

350

360

370

380

390

400

1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

Mil

lio

n M

etri

c T

on

s

Production

Consumption

Page 18: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

China Grain ImportsChina Grain Imports

Grains: Imports

Source: USDA PS&D

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

Mil

lio

n M

etri

c T

on

s

Imports

Page 19: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

China Grain ExportsChina Grain Exports

Grains: Exports

Source: USDA PS&D

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

Mil

lio

n M

etri

c T

on

s

Exports

Page 20: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

China Grain TradeChina Grain Trade

Grains: Exports, Imports

Source: USDA PS&D

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

Mil

lio

n M

etri

c T

on

s

Exports

Imports

Page 21: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

China Grain TradeChina Grain Trade

Grains: Exports, Net Exports, Imports

Source: USDA PS&D

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

Mil

lio

n M

etri

c T

on

s

Net Exports

Page 22: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

China ConnectionChina Connection• Yes, average meat consumption per person is

increasing relatively rapidly in China

• Yes, this has caused increased use of corn and protein meals in China

• So are China’s diet changes causing high corn/grain prices in the US and internationally?

• No! (No? Why not?)

• Because China has used its own grain (production and stocks) to produce meat

• Meat and grain markets are walled within China and have virtually no affect on outside prices

Page 23: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

Historically—there have beenHistorically—there have beenTwo Two Major Components of U.S. Major Components of U.S.

Farm Commodity PolicyFarm Commodity Policy

• Policy of Plenty: Ongoing public support to expand agricultural productive capacity through research, extension and other means

• Policy to Manage Plenty: Mechanisms to manage productive capacity and to compensate farmers for consumers’ accrued benefits of productivity gains

Page 24: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

Ag Policy Did Not Start in 1932Ag Policy Did Not Start in 1932

• Historic policy of plenty– Land distribution mechanisms – 1620

onward– Canals, railroads, farm to market roads– Land Grant Colleges – 1862, 1890, 1994– Experiment Stations – 1887– Cooperative Extension Service – 1914– Federal Farm Credit Act – 1916

• This policy of plenty often results in production outstripping demand

Page 25: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

When Policy of PlentyWhen Policy of Plentyis Too Muchis Too Much

• Given agriculture’s inability to quickly adjust to overproduction and low prices, there are 3 policy strategies:– Supply side – Demand side– Just pay money

Page 26: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

Traditional Farm Policy Traditional Farm Policy ElementsElements

• From 1973 (or earlier) to 1996, U.S. domestic farm policy generally included the following elements:– Base acreage

– Acreage reduction / set-asides

– Nonrecourse loans to support prices

– Government storage of commodities

– Domestic and foreign demand expansion

– Target price for major crop commodities• Deficiency payments for the difference between target price

and market price

Page 27: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

Critical ChangesCritical Changesin U.S. Policyin U.S. Policy

• Since 1985 there has been:– An export “mindset”

– A movement away from “managing plenty” to supporting income with government payments

• This view culminated in the 1996 FAIR Act:– Elimination of supply control instrument: set aside

program

– Replaced “price floors” with government payments

Page 28: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

Exports, Exports, ExportsExports, Exports, Exports

• For the last quarter century, exports have been heralded—and continue to be by some—as crop agriculture’s salvation

– Exports is the production safety valve that can rebalance agricultural markets

– Exports will grow at accelerating rates

• But it is that what happened?

Page 29: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

China Net Corn TradeChina Net Corn TradeWhat We Expected During Debate of 1996 FB:

Co

rn E

xp

ort

sC

orn

Im

po

rts

Mil. Bu.

1996 FAPRI Projections

1996 FAPRI Projections of Net Corn Trade

Page 30: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

China Net Corn TradeChina Net Corn TradeWhat We Got:

1996 FAPRI Projections of Net Corn Trade

PS&D Actual Net Corn Trade with 2004 ProjectionC

orn

Ex

po

rts

Co

rn I

mp

ort

s

Mil. Bu.

Page 31: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

What About ExportsWhat About Exports

Index of US Population, US Demand for 8 Crops and US Exports* of 8 Crops1979=1.0

US Population

US Exports

US Domestic Demand

*Adjusted for grain exported in meat

Page 32: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

What About Exports?• Why have exports not fulfilled our

hopes?– Export demand is braked by issues of

food security/food sovereignty– International crop production is impacted

by:• Increased acreage: Stage of development• Yield advances: World-wide distribution of

technology• US role as the leading nation in the world

– Politically, economically, technologically, and militarily

– And in prices too: Others price off US prices

Page 33: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

Characteristics of Ag SectorCharacteristics of Ag Sector• Agriculture is different from other

economic sectors.On the demand side:

– With low food prices—

• People don’t eat more meals a day

• They may change mix of foods

• Aggregate intake remains relatively stable

Page 34: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

Characteristics of Ag SectorCharacteristics of Ag Sector

• Agriculture is different from other economic sectors.On the supply side:– With low crop prices—

• Farmers continue to plant all their acres• Farmers don’t and “can’t afford to” reduce

their application of fertilizer and other major yield-determining inputs

• Who farms land may change• Essential resource—land—remains in

production in short- to medium-run

Page 35: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

Why Chronic Problems In Ag? Why Chronic Problems In Ag?

• Technology typically expands output faster than population and exports expand demand– Much of this technology has been paid

for by US taxpayers

• The growth in supply now is being additionally fueled by– increased acreages in Brazil, etc.– technological advance worldwide

Page 36: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

Why Chronic Problems In Ag?Why Chronic Problems In Ag?

• Lower prices should automatically correct itself– Consumers buy more– Producers produce less– Prices recover—problem solved!

• But in agriculture lower prices do not solve the problem– Little self-correction on the demand side

• People do not consume significantly more food

– Little self-correction on the supply side• Farmers do not produce significantly less output

Page 37: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

What Was That Again?What Was That Again?

• Supply and demand characteristics of aggregate agriculture cause chronic price and income problems– On average supply grows faster than

demand

– Agriculture cannot right itself when capsized by low prices

– (Always year-to-year random variability)

Page 38: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

Greatest RisksGreatest Risks• Short-term

– Weather, weather, weather: US, Brazil, China, India, elsewhere

• For example, US annual corn yields have dropped by 20 percent in years past (’83 ’88 ’93)

– High input prices• Long-term

– Acreage and yields greatly increase worldwide (not if with current prices)

– Low prices will return– Reduced farm asset values, especially land

Page 39: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

On Knife’s EdgeOn Knife’s Edge

• Short-term object lesson?– Need strategic reserves

• A properly managed stocks reserve• Reduce economic dislocation

• Long-term reality?– “New Era?” (fourth “New Era” in my lifetime)

– Supply growth has always caught and then surpassed demand growth (and it does not take long)

• This time, surge in productive capacity will be global suggesting need for global supply management

Page 40: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

Long-Term ConsiderationsLong-Term Considerations

• International supply response—yield

– Development and adoption of drought and saline resistant crops

– Globalization of agribusiness: Near universal access to the new technologies world-wide

• Narrowing of technology and yield differentials between US and the rest of the world

Page 41: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

Long-Term ConsiderationsLong-Term Considerations

• International supply response—acreage

– Long-run land potentially availability for major crops

• Savannah land in Brazil (250 mil. ac. -- USDA says 350)

• Savannah land in Venezuela, Guyana, and Peru (200 mil. ac.)

• Land in former Soviet Union (100 mil. ac.)

• Arid land in China’s west (100 mil. ac. GMO wheat)

• Savannah land in Sub-Saharan Africa (300 mil. ac. -- 10 percent of 3.1 bil. ac. of Savannah land)

– Easy to underestimate supply growth

Page 42: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

Policy for All SeasonsPolicy for All Seasons

• Assume the unexpected will happen– Random policy and weather events do

occur—Plan for them

• Establishment of International Grain and Oilseed Reserve– Moderate impacts of random policy and

weather events by providing stable supply until production responds

Page 43: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

Policy for All SeasonsPolicy for All Seasons

• Keep productive capacity well ahead of demand– Public investment in yield enhancing

technologies and practices

• Provide means to hold arable land in rotating fallow during periods of overproduction– This land can then quickly be returned

to production in the case of a crisis

Page 44: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

Agricultural Policy Analysis Center The University of Tennessee 310 Morgan Hall 2621 Morgan Circle Knoxville, TN 37996-4519

www.agpolicy.org

Thank YouThank You

Page 45: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

To receive an electronic version of our weekly ag policy column send an email to: [email protected] to be added to APAC’s Policy Pennings listserv or go towww.agpolicy.org

Weekly Policy ColumnWeekly Policy Column

Page 46: APCA US Agricultural Policy and Trade: The China Connection Daryll E. Ray & Harwood Schaffer University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

AAPPCCAA

China Meat and CornChina Meat and Corn

Indexed Meat Production (Pork, Broilers, Beef) and Corn Feed

Source: USDA PS&D

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

Ind

exed

199

0=1

Meat Production

Corn Feed