aortic symposium 2010
DESCRIPTION
Routine Hypothermia with Circulatory Arrest and Retrograde Cerebral Perfusion for Ascending Aortic Reconstruction . Division of Cardiac Surgery Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Andrew W. ElBardissi, MD, MPH Sary F. Aranki, MD Lawrence H. Cohn, MD Stanton K. Shernan , MD - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Aortic Symposium 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062811/56815ed4550346895dcd6a56/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Routine Hypothermia with Circulatory Arrest and Retrograde Cerebral Perfusion
for Ascending Aortic Reconstruction
Aortic Symposium 2010
Andrew W. ElBardissi, MD, MPHSary F. Aranki, MD
Lawrence H. Cohn, MDStanton K. Shernan, MD
Daniel J. FitzGerald, CCP, LPR. Morton Bolman III, MD
Division of Cardiac SurgeryBrigham and Women’s Hospital
![Page 2: Aortic Symposium 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062811/56815ed4550346895dcd6a56/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Natural History of Aneurysmal Disease
2
![Page 3: Aortic Symposium 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062811/56815ed4550346895dcd6a56/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Background•Aneurysmal ascending aortic degeneration includes aortic tissue proximal to the innominate artery•Aortic cross-clamping leaves a segment of aneurysmal distal ascending aorta
![Page 4: Aortic Symposium 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062811/56815ed4550346895dcd6a56/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Surgical Result following Reconstruction
Closed Distal Anastomosis Open Distal Anastomosis
![Page 5: Aortic Symposium 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062811/56815ed4550346895dcd6a56/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
![Page 6: Aortic Symposium 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062811/56815ed4550346895dcd6a56/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Objective
•Evaluate outcomes of elective ascending aortic reconstruction with open distal anastomosis (with RCP) versus closed distal anastomosis with aortic cross-clamping.
![Page 7: Aortic Symposium 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062811/56815ed4550346895dcd6a56/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Methods687 patients with Ascending Aortic
Reconstruction (2005-Present)
7
305 patients
Aortic Dissections
Complex aortic arch reconstructions
195 closed distal (CD)anastomosis
110 open distal (OD) anastomosis with RCP
1:1 Propensity Matching
99 CD 99 OD
![Page 8: Aortic Symposium 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062811/56815ed4550346895dcd6a56/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
• Primary endpoint–CVA–Temporary Neurologic Deficit–Ventilator Hours– ICU Hours–Length of Stay
• Secondary endpoint–30-day mortality– Intermediate-term Survival
8
Methods
![Page 9: Aortic Symposium 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062811/56815ed4550346895dcd6a56/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Preoperative Characteristics
9
OD (n=99) CD (n=99) p-valueAge 60±12 61±12 0.6
Male Gender n(%) 76 (77%) 72 (73%) 0.52Caucasion n(%) 93 (94%) 97 (98%) 0.39Diabetes n(%) 5 (5%) 6 (6%) 0.76
COPD n(%) 88 (89%) 87 (88%) 0.83Hyperlipidemia n(%) 49 (50%) 55 (56%) 0.39Hypertension n (%) 57 (57%) 61 (62%) 0.56
Serum Creatnine 0.98±.23 1.1±0.4 0.17History of CVA n(%) 4 (4%) 6 (6%) 0.52
Previous MI n(%) 4 (4%) 9 (9%) 0.15CHF n(%) 23 (23%) 24 (24%) 0.86
Angina n(%) 16 (16%) 20 (20%) 0.46NYHA Classification 0.43
I 42 (42%) 37 (37%)II 40 (40%) 41 (41%)III 20 (20%) 20 (20%)IV 0 (0%) 1 (1%)
Hemodynamic DataNormal sinus rhythm n(%) 87 (86%) 89 (89%) 0.66
Ejection Fraction 59 ±8 57±13 0.23Mean PAP 23±7 22±8 0.24
Aortic Stenosis n(%) 29 (29%) 37 (37%) 0.27Aortic Stenosis Gradient (mmHg) 35±17 38±20 0.25
![Page 10: Aortic Symposium 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062811/56815ed4550346895dcd6a56/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Operative Characteristics
10
OD (n=99) CD (n=99) p-valueReoperation n (%) 23 (23%) 18 (18%) 0.38CPB time (minutes) 206±95 160±79 0.0005
Cross-clamp time (minutes) 156±73 120±73 0.0006DHCA Temperature (Celsius) 21 . .
DHCA Time 21±8 (11, 50) . .RCP Time 17±8 (3, 50) . .
Concomitant ProceduresAortic valve replacement 22 (22%) 30 (30%) 0.55
CABG 24 (24%) 19 (19%) 0.39
![Page 11: Aortic Symposium 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062811/56815ed4550346895dcd6a56/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Results
CVA (%) TND (%)0%
1%
2%
RCP CPB
n=1 n=2 n=2 n=1
P=0.42 P=0.57
Ventilator Hours ICU Stay (hours) Length of Stay (days)
01020304050607080
P=0.20
P=0.44
P=0.52
0.50
0.55
0.60
0.65
0.70
0.75
0.80
0.85
0.90
0.95
1.00
0.00 300 900
Follow-up (days)1200
No difference in 30 day (OD, 0% vs. CD, 1%, p=0.59) or Intermediate-term Mortality
P=0.30
![Page 12: Aortic Symposium 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062811/56815ed4550346895dcd6a56/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
• Open distal reconstruction of ascending aorta in AAA repair– No difference in operative mortality,
stroke, temporary neurologic deficit, ventilator hours, ICU hours, or LOS compared to closed distal with aortic x-clamping
– Should be considered as a routine treatment strategy, as it allows removal of AA in its entirety
12
Conclusions