“measuring, reporting and verifying different mitigation ...€¦ · mrv- assessment of...
TRANSCRIPT
“Measuring, Reporting and Verifying Different Mitigation Actions – A Case Study of MAAP Tool”
Santiago de Chile, June 29 2016
Agenda
2
The Mitigation Action Assessment Protocol
MRV requirements in the new Mitigation landscape 3
7
MAAP Tool Pilots and Lessons Learned 12
New Carbon Markets Landscape
3
• From a single internationally accepted mechanism based on
projects to a diversity of initiatives:
• More diverse in nature - projects/policies
• Regional, National and Sub National actions
• Have different timeframes- short vs very long
• One sector or multi sectorial
• Bottom-up approach under the umbrella of individual NDC
• Building on future interpretations of Paris Agreement articles 6.2
and 6.4
• Multiple market instruments.
4
• Inclusive• Transparent• Efficient • And has
environmental integrity.
Innovating and building readiness for climate action, including carbonpricing instruments
Enabling scale-up of climate actions such as carbon pricing mechanisms
Partnership for Market Readiness; Pilot Auction Facility
Carbon Partnership Facility; Pilot Auction Facility, Partnership for Market Readiness; TCAF
PLANNING, DESIGN AND PILOTS
IMPLEMENTATION AND SCALE-UP
CONNECTIVITY AND GLOBAL TRADE
Networked Carbon Markets (NCM) Initiative
The Networked Carbon Markets initiative forms part of the WBG’s long term efforts to promote carbon pricing
End Goal: A connected international carbon market that is:
PROMOTING THE CASE AND EVIDENCE BASE FOR CARBON PRICINGe.g., Carbon Pricing Leadership Coalition; State and Trends of Carbon Pricing reports
5
Alinkedinternationalcarbonmarketisdesirable
Governmentsandmarketparticipantsneedinformation
abouttheschemesthattheylinkwithandthecarbonassetsthatare
imported
Governments should havethesovereignty toactresponsibly on
theinformationabouttheschemesthattheylinkwithandthecarbon
assetsthatareimported
FundamentalassumptionsoftheNCMinitiative
LinkingwillnotoccurandclimatefinancewillnotflowifGovernments,marketparticipantsandinvestorslackinformationabouttheschemesthattheylinkwith,carbonassetsthattheypurchaseorprogramstheyinvestin.
MRV- assessment of mitigation actions
• MRV requirements and tools:• Suitable to a diverse range of programs• Different users• Provide more information• Broader scope- SD
• Requirements at UNFCCC level to be defined• Basic principles will remain- conservativeness, accuracy,
transparency, traceability, etc.• Mitigation Actions Assessment Protocol (MAAP Tool)
• Quantitative assessment of level of development / risk areas for implementation for crediting mitigation actions
• Assess environmental integrity + Government Priorities + Sust Development• Promotes continuous improvement and benchmarking• Provides a technical input to the new concept of Mitigation Value
7
A key tool for achieving transparency in the design and implementation of mitigation actions is the Mitigation Action Assessment Protocol (MAAP)
The Mitigation Action Assessment Protocol
February 2016
Whiletheend-goaloftheMAAPistofacilitatelinking,manycountriesmaychoose
nottouseitforthispurpose,especiallyinthe
shortterm.
MAAPpilotshavedemonstratedthatitcanbe
usedtoachieveawiderangeofotherobjectives.
Agenda
8
The Mitigation Action Assessment Protocol
MRV requirements in the new Mitigation landscape 3
7
MAAP Tool Pilots and Lessons Learned 12
MitigationActionAssessmentProtocol• DevelopedbyDNVGL• ExpertReviewedby
IISDandNewClimateInstitute. Mitigation
value
PROGRAM LEVEL: Risk relating to the characteristics of a specific program
POLICY LEVEL: Risk relating to the
characteristics of a jurisdiction’s
collective low-carbon policies
CONTRIBUTION TO A GLOBAL TARGET Risk relating to the characteristics of a
jurisdiction’s contribution to
addressing global climate change
Mitigation Value Assessment
9
Development Process
Stakeholdersengagement
• CarbonExpoMay2013• LatinAmericaCarbonForum(RiodeJaneiro),FICCI(NewDelhi),AsianCarbonForum(Bangkok)– Fall2013
• GHGverifiers.ThailandFeb2016
Workinggroup-GloballyNetworkedCarbonMarkets
•WBInternalMeeting–June2013
• ParisWorkingGroupmeeting1– Sept.2013
•WebinarUpdate– Dec.2013
• ParisWorkingGroupmeeting2-February2014
Peerreview
• CommentsinvitedfromtheWorkingGroup,selected individualsandorganizations
• Technicalpeerreviewrs2014 - (IdeaCarbon,C2B2)2015- IISD,NewClimateInstitute
Testing and Pilots
• NAMAs- Ecuador, PeruLow Carbon City Programs Phitsanulok and Pakkret, Thailand.
10
Goals and MAAP Structure
11
Key indicators weighting average
Higher weight will assign a larger impact
Module area weightingrelative importance of each risk area within a module
Module’s assessmentresult
Key Indicators score
§ Score range for each level of development- Default- Override score
§ Level of confidence
12
Assessing the mitigation impact of a climate action through the MAAP can – and has – been used to achieve a wide range of objectives
Key modules in the MAAP
13
Mitigation Action Program
Definition & Scope
Objectives & Targets
Planning
Roles, Responsibilities &
Authorities
Barriers
Emissions reduction from Intervention
Monitoring and Reporting
Mitigation Action Management Entity
Management Framework
Financial and Investment Capacity
Framework
Climate Change Programs
Management
Investment Environment
Economic and political
environment
Climate Change Capacity
Development Benefits
Sustainable Development Objectives &
Targets
Planning & Participation
Monitoring of Sustainable
Development
Environmental Integrity
MAAP tool
Example LCC Program- Pakkret City- Feb 2016
Title of Presentation 14
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
201.Definition andscopeoftheMA
2.Objectivesandtargets
3.Planning
4.Roles,Responsibilities AndAuthorities5.Documents andrecords control.
6.Emissionsreductions frominterventions
7.monitoring andreporting
LCCProgramDesign
Agenda
15
The Mitigation Action Assessment Protocol
MRV requirements in the new Mitigation landscape 3
7
MAAP Tool Pilots and Lessons Learned 12
16
THE PROCESS OF SCREENING MITIGATION ACTIONS IN PERU
APPLICATION AS A NAMA SCREENING TOOL
NCM ACTIVITIES
Piloting the MAAP in Peru
Shortlisting of 80+ mitigation actions
Customization of MAAP by protocol developers & national experts
Ex ante assessment of 10 prioritized mitigation actions
Selection of 3 mitigation actions for support under the Partnership for Market Readiness: NAMA Waste,
NAMA Cement, and Mitigation Measure of PV distributed generation
TH
E
MA
AP
PI
LO
TS
• In December 2015, the MAAP was applied in Peru to compare and prioritize Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs) for its Partnership for Market Readiness (PMR) proposal.
• Mitigation actions chosen: NAMA Waste, NAMA Cement, and Mitigation Measure of photovoltaic distributed generation.
• The participatory nature of the assessment proved useful to identify areas of improvement.
• Next Step: Explore possibility of using the MAAP as one of the mainstays of a future Mitigation Action Registry in Peru.
17
• In February 2016, the NCM Initiative conducted field visits to the municipalities of Phitsanulok and Pak Kret to apply the MAAP to evaluate and compare Low-Carbon Cities (LCC) programs.
• The MAAP, as well as the findings of the field visits, were presented at a multi-stakeholder workshop in Bangkokorganized in collaboration with the Thai Greenhouse Gas Management Organization (TGO).
• Next step: TGO has expressed interest in scaling up the application of the MAAP to 100 low-carbon city activities in Thailand.
NCM ACTIVITIES
Piloting the MAAP in ThailandT
HE
M
AA
P P
IL
OT
S
PHITSANULOK
PAK KRET
LCC PROGRAMS IN THAILAND
BANGKOK
Conclusions and Further Development• Quantitative assessment.
• Availability of data.
• Focused on crediting readiness• Readiness of existing mitigation actions
• MAAP serves at this stage three purposes• Self evaluation
• Design support tool for MA seeking crediting
• Assessment tool for governments, development banks
• Benchmarking• MAAP Tool online version
18