antero resources corporations2.q4cdn.com/120921784/files/doc_presentations/2017/11/am-web… ·...
TRANSCRIPT
Partnership Overview
November 2017
Forward-Looking Statements
This presentation contains forward-looking statements. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this presentation that address activities, events or developments that Antero Midstream Partners LP, and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Partnership”) or Antero Midstream GP LP and its subsidiaries other than the Partnership (collectively, “AMGP”) as applicable expect, believe or anticipate will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements. The words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “intend,” “estimate,” “project,” “foresee,” “should,” “would,” “could,” or other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. However, the absence of these words does not mean that the statements are not forward-looking. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, forward-looking statements contained in this presentation specifically include expectations of plans, strategies, objectives, and anticipated financial and operating results of AMGP, the Partnership and Antero Resources Corporation (“Antero Resources”). These statements are based on certain assumptions made by the AMGP, the Partnership and Antero Resources based on management’s experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions, anticipated future developments and other factors believed to be appropriate. Such statements are subject to a number of assumptions, risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the control of AMGP or the Partnership, as applicable, which may cause actual results to differ materially from those implied or expressed by the forward-looking statements. These include the factors discussed or referenced under the heading “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 and in the Partnership’s subsequent filings with the SEC, as well as the factors discussed under “Risk Factors” in AMGP’s final prospectus dated May 3, 2017 and filed with the SEC on May 5, 2017.
AMGP and the Partnership caution you that these forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause these statements to be inaccurate, and readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements. These risks include, but are not limited to, Antero Resources’ expected future growth, Antero Resources’ ability to meet its drilling and development plan, commodity price volatility, inflation, environmental risks, drilling and completion and other operating risks, regulatory changes, the uncertainty inherent in projecting future rates of production, cash flow and access to capital, the timing of development expenditures, and the other risks discussed or referenced under the heading “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 and in the Partnership’s subsequent filings with the SEC.
The Partnership’s ability to make future distributions is substantially dependent upon the development and drilling plan of Antero Resources, which itself is substantially dependent upon the review and approval by the board of directors of Antero Resources of its capital budget on an annual basis. In connection with the review and approval of the annual capital budget by the board of directors of Antero Resources, the board of directors will take into consideration many factors, including expected commodity prices and the existing contractual obligations and capital resources and liquidity of Antero Resources at the time. In addition, AMGP’s ability to make future distributions is substantially dependent on the Partnership’s business, financial conditions and the ability to make distributions.
Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and neither AMGP or the Partnership undertakes any obligation to correct or update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.
1
Antero Midstream Partners LP is denoted as “AM”, Antero Midstream GP LP is denoted as “AMGP” and Antero
Resources Corporation is denoted as “AR” in the presentation, which are their respective New York Stock
Exchange ticker symbols.
2 Note: Enterprise Value as of 9/30/2017. AR enterprise value excludes 53% ownership in Antero Midstream.
100%
Incentive
Distribution
Rights
(IDRs)
Public
(NYSE: AMGP)
Enterprise Value : $3.8 Bn
General Partner
(NYSE: AM)
Enterprise Value : $7.0 Bn
Midstream MLP
(NYSE: AR)
Enterprise Value: $6.7 Bn
Exploration & Production
80% 20%
Affiliates Affiliates
53%
32%
Public
68%
47% Public
The combined enterprise value of the Antero complex is over $17 billion
Antero Simplified Organizational Structure
Market Cap……………….......
Enterprise Value(1)….........…..
LTM EBITDA……......………..
% Gathering/Compression
% Water
Net Debt/LTM EBITDA…….
Corporate Debt Rating……….
Gross Dedicated Acres(2)…….
$5.9 Billion
$7.0 Billion
$513 Million
57%
43%
2.1x
Ba2 / BB
562,000
Note: Market cap and enterprise value as of 9/30/2017.
1. Based on AM market capitalization plus debt minus cash.
2. Excludes 146,000 gross acres dedicated to third party for gathering and compression services.
Antero Midstream Profile
3
Deliver Organic Growth Over the Long Term
• Run by co-founders and employees with significant ownership in Antero complex
• Organically grow midstream operations servicing Antero Resources’ de-risked development
plan, resulting in top-tier distribution growth of 28% - 30% annually through 2020
• Not dependent on “drop-downs”, acquisitions, 3rd party business or equity markets to
deliver growth
“Just-in-time” Non-speculative Capital Investment
• High visibility capital investment driven by superior asset utilization
• Enter into long-term fixed-fee agreements with minimum volume commitments to minimize
direct commodity price risk and insulate cash flows
• Opportunistically target third party business leveraging existing infrastructure
Maintain a Strong and Flexible Balance Sheet
• Maintain leverage in the low 2x range
• Target distribution coverage ratio >1.25x through 2020
Capture the Energy Value Chain
• Expand operations across energy value chain to enhance the most integrated natural gas
and NGL story in the US
• Capture significant value and opportunity in integrated operations and cash flow diversity
Antero Midstream Business Strategy
4
Midstream Infrastructure (In Service)
Gathering Pipelines (Miles) 341
Compression Capacity (MMcf/d) 1,600
Condensate Pipelines (Miles) 19
Processing Plant (MMcf/d) 400
Fractionation Plant (Bbl/d) 20,000
Fresh Water Pipelines (Miles) 323
Fresh Water Impoundments 38
Regional Pipeline Capacity (Bcf/d) 1.4
Antero Clearwater Facility (Bbl/d)(1) 60,000
Compressor
Station
Antero
Clearwater
Facility
Sherwood
Processing
Facility
Stonewall
Pipeline
Gathering
Pipelines
Freshwater
Delivery
Pipelines`
Antero Rig
Antero Midstream Asset Overview
5
Antero
Clearwater
Facility
Sherwood
Processing
Complex
.
1. The Antero Clearwater Facility is scheduled to be placed into service in the fourth quarter of 2017.
6
Strong Sponsor that has the Largest Core Drilling Inventory
in Appalachia and is the Largest NGL Producer in the U.S. 1
Efficient Capital Investment Results in
Attractive Partnership-Wide Rates of Return 3
High Growth Organic Business Model Requiring
No Equity Funding and Free Cash Flow Positive in 2018(1) 2
Opportunity to Further Build out Northeast Value Chain and
Diversify Cash Flow Profile 4
Strong Financial Position with Low Leverage
and High Distribution Coverage 5
Antero Midstream & AMGP Investment Highlights
1. Before AM distributions.
Largest Core Drilling inventory in Appalachia 1
7
Based on thorough technical analysis of peer acreage configuration, well results and geology, Antero has the largest
core drilling inventory (see core outlines) in Appalachia and holds 44% of the total liquids rich undrilled inventory
3,890
2,096
1,757
1,024 1,001 817 776 741 653 633 632 563
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
Antero EQT CHK Range Rice Consol Cabot Chevron Noble Ascent SWN Gulfport
Un
dri
lled
Lo
cati
on
s
Core - NE Pennsylvania Dry Locations
Core - SW Marcellus & Utica Dry Locations
Core - Marcellus & Utica Liquids RichLocations
Core Liquids-Rich Appalachia Undrilled
Locations
44%
EQT 13%
RRC 10%
NBL 8%
CNX 6%
SWN 5%
CHK 4%
RICE 3%
Ascent 3%
CVX 2% GPOR
2%
Core outlines based upon Antero geologic interpretation, well control and peer acreage positions based on investor presentations, news releases, 10-K/10-Qs and various other sources. Rig information per
RigData as of 10/30/2017.
1. Peers include Ascent, CHK, CNX, COG, CVX, EQT, GPOR, HG, RICE, RRC and SWN.
* Undrilled location count net of acreage allocated to publicly disclosed joint ventures.
33 SW Marcellus Rigs
31 Utica Rigs
12 NE Marcellus Rigs
76 Total
Rigs
Undrilled Core Marcellus and Core Utica 3P Locations (1)(2)
Avg.
Lateral
Length 6,429’ 6,355’ 8,601’ 5,758’ 8,594’ 9,262’ 7,085’ 7,550’ 8,880’ 6,225’ 7,762’ 7,812’
105.6
34%
30%
11% 13%
8%
12% 12% 12% 13%
7%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
45.0
55.0
65.0
75.0
85.0
95.0
105.0
115.0
AR RRC DVN APC EOG COP CHK PXD NBL OXY
NG
L %
of
Pro
du
ct
Reve
nu
es
MB
bl/d
3Q17 Daily NGL Production NGL % of Product Revenues
Source: SEC filings and company press releases. Realized prices are weighted average including ethane (C2) where applicable..
Top U.S. NGL Producers (MBbl/d) – 3Q 2017
Largest NGL producer in the
U.S. in 3Q ’17 with the
Highest exposure to NGLs
among the top 10 peer group
$23.11
Pre-hedged Realized Price ($/Bbl)
$16.93 $15.15 $31.07 $22.38 $20.72 $21.83 $18.96 $22.91 $22.99
Antero is the largest NGL producer in the U.S and has the most NGL exposure at
34% of total upstream company revenues
Largest NGL Producer in the U.S. 1
8
Longer Laterals Materially Improve E&P Economics 1
9
6,000 Foot Lateral 9,000 Foot Lateral
NOTE: Assumes 2.0 Bcf/1,000’ type curve for the Antero Marcellus Highly-Rich Gas (1250 Btu) and Nymex Henry Hub prices of $3.00 and WTI of $54.
1. All laterals rounded to the nearest thousand. 788 of the 894 wells have been completed
2. Represents wells placed to sales.
Antero has been a leader in drilling long laterals in Appalachia
12,000 Foot Lateral
Pre-Tax Economics
ROR (%) 39%
PV-10
($MM) $5.0
Pre-Tax Economics
ROR (%) 55%
PV-10
($MM) $9.5
Pre-Tax Economics
ROR (%) 61%
PV-10
($MM) $12.4
30 29
14
25
9 5 1
181
227
279 294
164 150
55 37
9 16
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
≤ 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 ≥ 15000
We
ll C
ou
nt
Lateral Length(1)
Antero Lateral Lengths To Date Antero
# of
Wells
Avg.
Lateral
Length
Total Drilling
Program to Date 894 8,250
2017 Program(2) 135 9,250
2018-2020
Program(2) 465 9,500
Wells to Date
≥10,000’ 230 10,750
15,000 Foot Lateral
Pre-Tax Economics
ROR (%) 67%
PV-10
($MM) $16.0
Future completion
programs focused on
longer lateral
length locations
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420
We
llh
ea
d P
rod
uc
tio
n
(C
um
ula
tive
MM
cf)
Days From Peak Gas
AR’s production from advanced completions is outperforming the 2.0 Bcf/1,000’ wellhead
type curve – 2,500 lb/ft completions are 17% above type curve (First 243 days)
Well Recoveries Continue to Improve and Advanced
Completions Require More Water 1
10
AR Type Curve Outperformance
1,500 lb/ft $0.85 MM/1,000 Well Cost
38 wells
34 Bbl/ft of Water
1,875 lb/ft $0.89 MM/1,000 Well Cost
90 wells
40 Bbl/ft of Water
2,500 lb/ft $0.97 MM/1,000’ Well Cost
21 wells
48 Bbl/ft of Water
2.0 Bcf/1,000' Type
Curve Cumulative
Production
1. Cumulative average production per well normalized to a 9,000’ lateral. Cumulative production lines excludes wellhead condensate.
2. 1,875 pounds per foot type curve represents 1,750 pounds per foot wells and 2,000 pounds per foot wells.
11
Antero Resources Standalone E&P Long-Term Targets
Antero Resources is now well positioned to generate
peer leading growth and free cash flow
AR’s Attractive Long Term Outlook 1
1.0 1.5
1.8 2.3
2.7 3.3
3.8
3.9x
3.6x
2.8x
0.0x
0.5x
1.0x
1.5x
2.0x
2.5x
3.0x
3.5x
4.0x
4.5x
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
2014A 2015A 2016A 2017Guidance
2018Target
2019Target
2020Target
Sta
nd
alo
ne
E&
P L
eve
rag
e
Net
Pro
du
cti
on
(B
cfe
/d)
Target Leverage in Low 2x
Reduce Capex &
Leverage
Maintain
Production Growth
Generate Free
Cash Flow
Standalone E&P Leverage Net Production (Actual)
Net Production (Guidance)
Net Production (Target)
(1) Assumes WTI price of $54 and Nymex Henry Hub price of $3.00.
12 1. AR standalone LTM EBITDAX includes $119 million in distributions from AR’s ownership of AM common units.
2. Nymex strip pricing as of 9/30/2017.
AR Leverage Reduction(1) Restructuring of hedge swap prices resulted in
no change to hedge volumes
80% of targeted natural gas production hedged
through 2020 at $3.43/MMBtu
– $1.2 billion of remaining hedge value
Utilizing a portion of net operating losses
carried forward to eliminate cash taxes on
realized gains
Antero monetized over $1 billion of non-E&P assets through the sale of $311 million of AM
common units and $750 million through hedge restructuring
3.4x 3.0x 3.2x
2.6x
0.0x
1.0x
2.0x
3.0x
4.0x
6/30/2017 9/30/2017
Consolidated Standalone
$1 Billion Delevering Program Completed 1
$3.64
$3.91
$3.70 $3.63
$3.31 $3.16
$2.91
$3.50
$3.50 $3.25
$3.00 $3.00
$2.00
$3.00
$4.00
0
400
800
1,200
1,600
2,000
2,400
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
BBtu/d $/Mcf Hedged Volume
Current NYMEX Strip(2)
Natural Gas Hedge Position
Restructured Hedge Price
Previous Hedge Price
~$750 Million of
Proceeds
No Change
to Price
Remaining Value as of 9/30/17: $1.2 Billion(2)
1,351
1,918
- 200 400 600 800
1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000
3Q 2016 3Q 2017
140 142
-
50
100
150
200
3Q 2016 3Q 2017
777
1,207
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
3Q 2016 3Q 2017
1,431 1,587
- 200 400 600 800
1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000
3Q 2016 3Q 2017
Note: All fees are as of year end 2016. Marcellus Utica
Fixed Fee: $0.32/Mcf Fixed Fee: $0.19/Mcf
Fixed Fee: $0.19/Mcf Fixed Fee: $3.69/Bbl
Low Pressure Gathering (MMcf/d) Compression (MMcf/d)
High Pressure Gathering (MMcf/d) Fresh Water Delivery (MBbl/d)
High Growth Midstream Throughput 2
High growth throughput driven by de-risked sponsor development plan and fixed-fee
contracts eliminate direct commodity price exposure
13
6.9x 6.1x
4.5x 4.4x
0.0x
2.0x
4.0x
6.0x
8.0x
10.0x
12.0x
2014 2015 2016 2017E DropDown
Industry leading organic growth story
– ~$2.3 billion in capital spent through
9/30/2016 on gathering and
compression and water assets
– Assumes midpoint guidance EBITDA
for 2017 (excluding JV)
– 4.4x capital expenditures to buildout
EBITDA
– 10-year identified project inventory of
$5.0 billion
Organic Adjusted EBITDA Multiple vs. Drop Down Multiples
Drop Down Median:
8.8x
AM Organic EBITDA Multiple(1)
AM Builds at 3x to 6x EBITDA
vs.
Other MLPs that Drop Down/Buy
at 8x to 12x+ EBITDA
Antero Midstream Project Unlevered IRRs
25%
15%
10%
30%
15% 15%
35%
25%
20%
40%
25%
18%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
LPGathering
HPGathering
Compression FreshWater
Delivery
AdvancedWastewaterTreatment
Processing/Fractionation
Inte
rnal
Rate
of
Retu
rn
Wtd. Avg. 24% IRR
(2)
Note: Precedent data per IHS Herold’s research and public filings.
1. Antero Midstream organic multiples calculated as gathering and compression and water capital expended through Q3 of each respective year divided by Adjusted EBITDA, assuming 12-15 month
lag between capital incurred and full system utilization.
2. Selected gathering and compression drop down acquisitions since 1/1/2015. Drop down multiples are based on NTM EBITDA. Source: Public company filings and press releases.
Organic Growth Results in Attractive Rates of Return
Organic growth strategy provides attractive returns while avoiding the competitive
acquisition market and reliance on capital markets
14
2
Return on Invested Capital =
Net Income + Interest Expense + Taxes
Average Total Liabilities and Partners
Capital – Current Liabilities
Attractive Return on Invested Capital
Attractive project rates of return and increasing capital efficiencies result in
economic and rapidly improving Partnership-wide return on invested capital (ROIC)
15
2
12%
9%
12%
15%
17%
19% 20%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
2014A 2015A 2016A 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E
AM Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
Actual Consensus
• AM’s focus on organic growth and
capital efficiencies results in an
increasing returns on invested
capital through 2020 based on
consensus estimates
‒ Antero Midstream’s ROIC
declined in 2015 due to the
water drop-down transaction
and associated earn-out
payment included in liabilities
on balance sheet
• 2017 estimated ROIC of 15% in
fourth year of operations
Source: Factset consensus estimates.
$1.03
$1.33
1.8x
1.4x
0.5x
1.0x
1.5x
2.0x
2.5x
3.0x
$0.00
$0.50
$1.00
$1.50
$2.00
$2.50
$3.00
2016A 2017Guidance
2018ETarget
2019ETarget
2020ETarget
DC
F C
ove
rag
e R
ati
o a
nd
Leve
rag
e R
ati
o
Dis
trib
uti
on
Pe
r U
nit
DCF Coverage >1.25x
Note: Future distributions subject to Board approval.
High growth midstream throughput and efficient capital investment result in top-tier distribution
growth of 28% to 30% through 2020 while maintaining leverage in the low 2-times
Distribution Guidance
Distribution Target
DCF Coverage
AM Long Term Growth With Low Leverage
AM Growth – Midpoint of Guidance and Long-term Targets
16
2
Target Leverage in Low 2x
AMGP Highly Levered to AM Distribution Growth
$0.00 $0.00 $0.04
$0.21
$0.45
$0.73
$1.11
$0.00
$0.20
$0.40
$0.60
$0.80
$1.00
$1.20
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$0.68
MQD
$0.80
2015A
$1.03
2016A
$1.33
2017G
$1.71
2018T
$2.21
2019T
$2.85
2020T
AM
GP
Dis
trib
uti
on
s P
er
Sh
are
($/S
hare
)
AM
GP
Cas
h A
va
ila
ble
fo
r D
istr
ibu
tio
n (
$M
M)
1. AMGP estimated cash available for distribution (CAFD) is net of (i) Series B unit distributions, (ii) general and administrative expense, and (iii) U.S. federal and state income taxes
(assuming 38% effective income tax rate)
2. 2017 AMGP distribution assumes full-year distribution. Pro-rated distribution from IPO date to year-end 2017 equal to $0.16 per share at the midpoint.
AMGP Estimated Cash Available for Distribution(1)
AMGP Distributions per Share Target(1)
AM distributions drive IDR cash flow which drives AMGP distributions
with upside to potential corporate tax reform in c-corp structure
AM DPU
Year
(2)
AMGP Distribution Growth – Midpoint of Guidance and Long-term Targets
Early Stage
IDR
Participation
17
2
8,300
10,300
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000
11,000
12,000
2014A 2017E Record
Increasing Lateral Lengths (Feet) Increasing Wells Per Pad
Increasing Recoveries Per 1,000’ (Bcfe) Increasing Water Per Foot (Bbl/ft)
Midstream Capital Efficiencies Continue to Improve
Longer lateral wells, increasing recoveries per well, and more wells per pad result in more
efficient gathering, compression and freshwater delivery capital investment
18
6
9
14
-
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
2014A 2017E Record
1.7
2.4
3.6
-
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2014A 2017E Record
33
42
62
-
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2014A 2017E Record
3
17,400
In-service 2017 Budget
Utica Marcellus
Antero Midstream has significant visibility and insight into Antero Resources’ long-term
development plan, resulting in non-speculative midstream investment
Significant Visibility on Midstream Investment 3
19
~$4.2 Billion Organic Project
Backlog
~$800 Million JV
Project Backlog
WELL PAD
LOW PRESSURE GATHERING
HIGH PRESSURE GATHERING
COMPRESSION
GAS PROCESSING
(50% INTEREST)
REGIONAL
GATHERING
PIPELINE
(15% INTEREST)
FRACTIONATION TERMINALS & STORAGE
Y-GRADE PIPELINE
(ETHANE, PROPANE, BUTANE)
NGL PRODUCT PIPELINES
LONG HAUL PIPELINE
INTERCONNECT
END USERS
PDH PLANT
>$1.0 Billion
Downstream
Investment
Opportunity Set
Note: Third party logos denote company operator of respective asset.
AM Assets AM/MPLX JV Assets Potential AM Opportunities
4 Northeast Value Chain Opportunity
20
Upstream Downstream
• Participating in the full value chain diversifies and sustains Antero’s integrated business model
• $5.0 billion organic project backlog and $1.0 billion downstream investment opportunity set
Creating a Diversified Asset Mix in the Northeast
63%
35%
2%
Gathering
& Compression
Fresh Water
Delivery
Regional Gas
Pipeline
EBITDA
Contribution % EBITDA
Contribution %
60% 24%
4%
10%
2%
Gathering
& Compression Fresh Water
Delivery
Processing
& Fractionation
JV Regional Gas
Pipeline
Wastewater
Treatment
2016A 2020E
4
Antero Midstream is creating a diversified organic midstream infrastructure business in
the Northeast that supports the long-term growth profile of the Marcellus and Utica
21
2.1x
0.0x
0.5x
1.0x
1.5x
2.0x
2.5x
3.0x
3.5x
4.0x
4.5x
Peer 1 Peer 2 Peer 3 Peer 4 Peer 5 Peer 6 Peer 7
Net
Deb
t / L
TM
EB
ITD
A
• $1.5 billion revolver in place to fund future growth capital
(5.0x Debt/EBITDA Cap)
• Liquidity of $1,084 million at 9/30/2017 based off $1,500
million revolver
• Sponsor (NYSE: AR) has Ba2/BB corporate debt ratings
• AM corporate debt ratings also Ba2/BB
AM Liquidity (9/30/2017)
AM Peer Leverage Comparison(1)
($ in millions)
Revolver Capacity $1,500
Less: Borrowings (418)
Plus: Cash 2
Liquidity $1,084
1. As of 9/30/2017. Peers include TEP, EQM, WES, RMP, SHLX, DM, and CNNX.
Financial Flexibility
5
Strong and flexible balance sheet combined with significant liquidity
Strong Financial Position
22
OPPORTUNITY POSITIONING
• Fresh water delivery, waste water treatment and
gathering/compression services to capture third party
business in Appalachia and enhance asset utilization
• 400 Deep Utica locations underlying the Marcellus in West
Virginia dedicated to AM and will require some new
dry gas infrastructure
• Industry is continuing to delineate deep Utica resource
• Undedicated acreage acquisitions by AR are dedicated to
AM for gathering, compression, processing and water
services
• AR has added over 200,000 net acres since 2013 IPO
• Antero leverages its resource and production to optimize
projects for AR and AM invests in the infrastructure
• Natural gas and NGL pipelines, terminals and storage
• ~1,000 incremental locations prospective for Upper
Devonian dedicated to AM for gathering and water services
• Volumes can go to Marcellus system already in place
• AM has multiple pathways to upside beyond its $5.0 billion organic project backlog
Downstream Infrastructure
Buildout 1
AR Acreage Consolidation 2
Third Party Business 3
Upper Devonian 4
WV/PA Utica Dry Gas 5
AM Upside Opportunity Set
23
Antero Midstream
Detailed Asset Overview
24
Marcellus Gathering and Compression Assets
• Provides Marcellus gathering and compression
services
− Liquids-rich gas is delivered to AM/MPLX’s 1.6
Bcf/d Sherwood processing complex
• Significant growth projected over the next twelve
months as set out below:
• Antero plans to operate an average of four drilling
rigs in the Marcellus Shale during 2017, including
intermediate rigs
• Antero plans to complete 110 Marcellus wells in 2017
− AM dedicated acreage contains over 2,000 gross
undeveloped Marcellus locations
• Antero 2017 development plan averages nine wells
per pad, improving economics at AM
Marcellus Gathering & Compression
Note: Antero acreage position reflects tax districts in which greater than 3,000 net acres are owned.
YE 2016 YE 2017E
Low Pressure Gathering
Pipelines (Miles)
115 126
High Pressure Gathering
Pipelines (Miles)
98 117
Compression Capacity
(MMcf/d)
1,015 1,505
Acquisition Acreage
25
• Provides Utica gathering and compression services
− Liquids-rich gas delivered into MPLX’s 800 MMcf/d
Seneca processing complex
− Condensate delivered to centralized stabilization
and truck loading facilities
• Significant growth projected over the next twelve months
as set out below:
• Antero plans to operate an average of three drilling rigs
in the Utica Shale during 2017, including intermediate
rigs
• All 25 gross wells targeted to be completed in 2017 are
on Antero Midstream’s footprint
• Antero 2017 development program plan averages six
wells per pad
Utica Gathering & Compression
Note: Antero acreage position reflects tax districts in which greater than 3,000 net acres are owned.
Utica Gathering and Compression Assets
YE 2016 YE 2017E
Low Pressure Gathering
Pipelines (Miles) 58 63
High Pressure Gathering
Pipelines (Miles) 36 36
Condensate Pipelines (Miles) 19 19
Compression Capacity
(MMcf/d) 120 120
26
Marcellus and Utica Fresh Water Delivery Assets
Water Business Assets
• Fresh water delivery assets provide fresh water for Marcellus
and Utica well completions
– Year-round water supply sources: Clearwater Facility, Ohio
River, local rivers & reservoirs(2)
– 100% fixed fee long term contracts
Note: Antero acreage position reflects tax districts in which greater than 3,000 net acres are owned.
1. All Antero water withdrawal sites are fully permitted under long-term state regulatory permits both in WV and OH.
2. As of 12/31/2016.
3. Marcellus assumes fee of $3.69 per barrel subject to annual inflation and 40 barrels of water per lateral foot that utilize the fresh water delivery system based on 9,000 foot lateral. Operating margin
excludes G&A. Utica assumes fee of $3.64 per barrel subject to annual inflation and 37 barrels of water per lateral foot that utilize the fresh water delivery system based on 9,000 foot lateral. Water volumes
assume 5% recycling. Operating margin excludes G&A.
Projected Water Business Infrastructure(1)
Marcellus
Shale
Utica
Shale Total
YE 2016 Cumulative Fresh Water
Delivery Capex ($MM) (2) $610 $135 $745
Water Pipelines
(Miles) 203 83 286
Fresh Water Storage
Impoundments 23 13 36
2017E Fresh Water Delivery Capex
Budget ($MM) $50 $25 $75
Water Pipelines
(Miles) 28 9 37
Fresh Water Storage
Impoundments 3 1 4
Cash Operating
Margin per Well(3)
$1.0MM -
$1.1MM
$925k -
$975k
2017E Advanced Waste Water
Treatment Budget ($MM) $100
2017E Total Water Business
Budget ($MM) $175
27
Antero Clearwater advanced wastewater treatment
facility currently under construction – connects to
Antero freshwater delivery system
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
Antero Clearwater Advanced Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Bbl/d)
Produced/Flowback Volumes (Bbl/d)
Illustrative Produced & Flowback Water Volumes Advanced Wastewater Treatment
Antero Produced Water Services and Freshwater Delivery Business
Antero Advanced
Wastewater Treatment
3rd Party Recycling
and Well Disposal
(Bbl/d)
Advanced Wastewater Treatment Complex
Estimated capital expenditures ($ million)(1) ~$275
Standalone EBITDA at 100% utilization(2) ~$55 – $65
Implied investment to standalone EBITDA build-out multiple ~4x – 5x
Estimated per well savings to Antero Resources ~$150,000
Estimated in-service date Late 2017
Operating capacity (Bbl/d) 60,000
Operating agreement
• Antero has contracted with Veolia to build the largest advanced wastewater treatment complex in the world for produced water from shale
oil and gas
• Veolia will build and operate, and Antero will fund and own the
Clearwater facility
−Will treat and recycle AR produced and flowback water
− Creates additional year-round water source for completions
−Will have capacity for significant third party business
1. Includes capital to construct pipeline to connect facility to freshwater delivery system. Includes $10 million that AR agreed to fund in the drop down transaction.
2. Standalone EBITDA projection assumes inter-company fixed fee for recycling of $4.00 per barrel and 60,000 barrels per day of capacity. Does not include potential sales of marketable byproducts.
20 Years, Extendable
Integrated Water Business
Antero Advanced
Wastewater Treatment
Freshwater delivery system
Flowback and
produced
Water
Well Pad
Well Pad
Completion
Operations
Producing
Freshwater
Salt
Calcium Chloride
Marketable byproduct
Marketable byproduct used in oil
and gas operations
Freshwater delivery system
Advanced Wastewater Treatment Assets
Capacity for third party
business
28
29
• Largest shale oil and gas related water treatment facility in the world
–60,000 Bbls/d capacity
• 100% fixed fee long term contracts
• Compliments fresh water delivery infrastructure ($800 million investment)
• At full capacity, will eliminate ~172,000 water truck trips per year, or ~15 MMBbls
Antero Clearwater Facility Nearing Completion
Processing and Fractionation Assets
Antero Midstream (NYSE: AM) and MPLX (NYSE: MPLX) formed a joint venture for processing and fractionation
infrastructure in the core of the liquids-rich Marcellus and Utica Shales in February 2017
Strategic Rationale
• Further aligns the largest core liquids-rich
resource base with the largest processing
and fractionation footprint in Appalachia
• Fits with AM’s “full value chain organic
growth” strategy
• Improved visibility throughout vertical
value chain and ability to deploy “just-in-
time” capital supporting Antero Resources’
rich gas development
Note: RigData as of 9/30/17. Rigs drilling in rich gas areas only.
1. New West Virginia site location still to be determined.
MarkWest / Antero Midstream Hopedale
Fractionation Complex
C3+ Fractionation 1 & 2: 120 MBbl/d In Service
C3+ Fractionation 3: 60 MBbl/d In Service
20 MBbl/d In Service, net to JV
MarkWest / Antero Midstream Sherwood
Complex: 11 x 200 MMcf/d
Sherwood 1 – 6: 1.2 Bcf/d In Service
Sherwood 7: 200 MMcf/d In Service
Sherwood 8: 200 MMcf/d In Service
Sherwood 9: 200 MMcf/d 4Q 2017
Sherwood 10: 200 MMcf/d 3Q 2018
Sherwood 11: 200 MMcf/d 4Q 2018
De-ethanization: 40 MBbl/d In Service
Future Processing Complex
TBD 1 – 6 – Potential – 1,200 MMcf/d (1)
Achievements Since Announcement
• Successfully placed in service two
processing plants with 400 MMcf/d of
combined capacity
‒ Sherwood 7: Fully Utilized
‒ Sherwood 8: Fully Utilized
‒ Sherwood 9: Expected year-end 2017
• Announced additional commitments for
Sherwood Plants 10 and 11
30
Appendix
31
Key Variable 2017 Guidance(1)
Financial:
Net Income ($MM) $305 – $345
Adjusted EBITDA ($MM) $520 – $560
Distributable Cash Flow ($MM) $405 – $445
Year-over-Year Distribution Growth 28% – 30%
DCF Coverage Ratio 1.30x – 1.45x
Operating:
Gathering Pipelines (Miles) 35
Compression Capacity Added (MMcf/d) 490
Fresh Water Pipeline Added (Miles) 37
Fresh Water Impoundments 4
Capital Expenditures ($MM):
Gathering and Compression Infrastructure $350
Fresh Water Infrastructure $75
Advanced Wastewater Treatment $100
Processing and Fractionation Joint Venture $275
Total Capital Expenditures ($MM) $800
Antero Midstream – 2017 Guidance
32
1. Per press release dated 2/6/2017.
2017 Capital Budget
By Area
33
$480 Million – 2016
By Segment ($MM)
By Area
$800 Million – 2017
By Segment ($MM)
Antero Midstream’s 2017 capital budget is $800 million, a 67% increase from the 2016 capital budget of $480 million, including
$275 for the processing and fractionation JV announced on 2/6/2017
130 Completions
$255 53%
$50 11%
$130 27%
$45 9%
Gathering and
Compression
Fresh Water
Advanced
Wastewater
Treatment
Stonewall
Marcellus $456 95%
Utica $24 5%
$350 44%
$75 9%
$100 13%
$275 34%
Marcellus $680 85%
Utica $120 15%
Advanced
Wastewater
Treatment
Fresh Water
Gathering and
Compression
Processing and
Fractionation
LTM Production
NTM Production Forecast
Average LTM Production
Maintenance Capital Methodology
• Maintenance Capital Calculation Methodology – Low Pressure Gathering
– Estimate the number of new well connections needed during the forecast period in order to offset the natural production
decline and maintain the average throughput volume on our system over the LTM period
– (1) Compare this number of well connections to the total number of well connections estimated to be made during such
period, and
– (2) Designate an equal percentage of our estimated low pressure gathering capital expenditures as maintenance capital
expenditures
Maintenance capital expenditures are cash expenditures (including expenditures for the
construction or development of new capital assets or the replacement, improvement or expansion
of existing capital assets) made to maintain, over the long term, our operating capacity or revenue
• Illustrative Example
LTM Forecast Period
Decline of LTM average throughput to be replaced with production volume
from new well connections
• Maintenance Capital Calculation Methodology – Fresh Water Distribution
− Estimate the number of wells to which we would need to distribute fresh water during the forecast period in order to maintain
the average fresh water throughput volume on our system over the LTM period
− (1) Compare this number of wells to the total number of new wells to which we expect to distribute fresh water during such
period, and
− (2) Designate an equal percentage of our estimated water line capital expenditures as maintenance capital expenditures
34
Antero Midstream EBITDA Reconciliation
EBITDA and DCF Reconciliation
35
Three months ended
September 30,
2016 2017
Net income $ 70,524 $ 80,893
Interest expense 5,303 9,311
Depreciation expense 26,136 30,556
Accretion of contingent acquisition consideration 3,527 2,556
Equity-based compensation 6,599 7,199
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates (1,544) (7,033)
Distributions from unconsolidated affiliates — 4,300
Adjusted EBITDA $ 110,545 $ 127,782
Interest paid (4,043) (20,554)
Decrease in cash reserved for bond interest — 8,831
Cash reserved for payment of income tax withholding upon vesting of Antero Midstream Partners LP
equity-based compensation awards (1,000) (1,500)
Cash distribution to be received from unconsolidated affiliate 2,221 —
Maintenance capital expenditures (4,638) (10,772)
Distributable cash flow $ 103,085 $ 103,787
Distributions Declared to Antero Midstream Holders
Limited Partners $ 47,025 $ 63,454
Incentive distribution rights 4,820 19,067
Total Aggregate Distributions $ 51,845 $ 82,521
DCF coverage ratio 2.0x 1.3x
Cautionary Note
The SEC permits oil and gas companies, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose only proved, probable and possible reserve estimates
(collectively, “3P”). Antero has provided internally generated estimates for proved, probable and possible reserves in this presentation in
accordance with SEC guidelines and definitions, which have been audited by Antero’s third-party engineers. Unless otherwise noted,
reserve estimates as of December 31, 2016 assume ethane rejection and strip pricing.
Actual quantities that may be ultimately recovered from Antero’s interests may differ substantially from the estimates in this presentation.
Factors affecting ultimate recovery include the scope of Antero’s ongoing drilling program, which will be directly affected by commodity
prices, the availability of capital, drilling and production costs, availability of drilling services and equipment, drilling results, lease
expirations, transportation constraints, regulatory approvals and other factors, and actual drilling results, including geological and
mechanical factors affecting recovery rates.
In this presentation:
• “3P reserves” refer to Antero’s estimated aggregate proved, probable and possible reserves as of December 31, 2016. The SEC
prohibits companies from aggregating proved, probable and possible reserves in filings with the SEC due to the different levels of
certainty associated with each reserve category.
• “EUR,” or “Estimated Ultimate Recovery,” refers to Antero’s internal estimates of per well hydrocarbon quantities that may be
potentially recovered from a hypothetical future well completed as a producer in the area. These quantities do not necessarily
constitute or represent reserves within the meaning of the Society of Petroleum Engineer’s Petroleum Resource Management
System or the SEC’s oil and natural gas disclosure rules.
• “Condensate” refers to gas having a heat content between 1250 BTU and 1300 BTU in the Utica Shale.
• “Highly-rich gas/condensate” refers to gas having a heat content between 1275 BTU and 1350 BTU in the Marcellus Shale and 1225
BTU and 1250 BTU in the Utica Shale.
• “Highly-rich gas” refers to gas having a heat content between 1200 BTU and 1275 BTU in the Marcellus Shale and 1200 BTU and
1225 BTU in the Utica Shale.
• “Rich gas” refers to gas having a heat content of between 1100 BTU and 1200 BTU.
• “Dry gas” refers to gas containing insufficient quantities of hydrocarbons heavier than methane to allow their commercial extraction or
to require their removal in order to render the gas suitable for fuel use.
Regarding Hydrocarbon Quantities
36