annex 1 - national infrastructure planning · pdf filea free digital copy of the application...
TRANSCRIPT
EDF Energy NNB
The Qube, 90 Whitfield Street London W1T 4EZ Tel +44 (0) 20 3219 6600
edfenergy.com
NNB Generation Company (HPC) Limited. Registered in England and Wales. Registered No. 06937084. Registered office: 40 Grosvenor Place, Victoria, London SW1X 7EN
Address Address Address Address Address Address 28 September 2017 Dear The Hinkley Point C (Nuclear Generating Station) Order 2013 – S.I. 2013 No. 648 Application for a Non-Material Change in relation to the Hinkley Point C Development Site Consultation under Regulation 7 of the Infrastructure Planning (Changes to, and Revocation of, Development Consent Orders) Regulations 2011 In March 2013, the Secretary of State granted a Development Consent Order (DCO) authorising construction of a new nuclear power station at Hinkley Point in Somerset, known as Hinkley Point C, and associated development (Project). Over the past four years, NNB Generation Company (HPC) Limited (referred to in this letter as "EDF Energy") has been working with its delivery partners to ensure that the Project is delivered effectively and efficiently. As a result of this process, EDF Energy is now seeking consent from the Secretary of State to vary the provisions made in the DCO for infrastructure at the Hinkley Point C Main Development Site. The application seeks consent for the following non-material changes, with further details provided in the Application Statement accompanying the application: the redesign of some of the permanent buildings; the erection of additional pipework along the underside of the temporary jetty to enable discharges from the site; an alteration to the alignment of the sea wall.
EDF Energy is carrying out consultation on this application. Please send any representations about the application by email to: [email protected], or in writing to: Major Applications & Plans, The Planning Inspectorate, Temple Quay House, 2 The Square Temple Quay, Bristol BS1 6PN. Please quote HPC Project – Non-material change 3 – Main Development Site on any correspondence. The deadline for receipt of representations is 10 November 2017.
Copies of the full application documentation can be inspected free of charge at the following locations:
West Somerset District Council, West Somerset House, Killick Way, Williton, Taunton, TA4 4QA. Opening hours: Monday to Thursday: 8:30am - 5:00pm, Friday: 8:30am - 4:30pm.
EDF Energy Visitor Centre, Angel Place Shopping Centre, Bridgwater, TA6 3TQ. Opening hours: Monday to Friday: 9:30am-4:00pm, Saturday: 10am-1pm.
Sedgemoor District Council, Bridgwater House, Kings Square, Bridgwater, TA6 3AR. Opening hours: Monday to Friday: 9:00am-5:00pm.
A free digital copy of the application can be obtained from EDF Energy by writing to: [email protected]. Alternatively, a paper copy can be obtained from EDF Energy for £150.
Enclosed for reference is a copy of the notice advertising the application that will be published in the Bridgwater Mercury on 3 and 10 October 2017.
If you have any queries, please feel free to contact me using the details below.
Yours sincerely
Carly Vince
Chief Planning Officer
(e)
Encl. Copy of the notice advertising the application
EDF Energy NNB
Building name, Street Name City POST CODE Tel +44 (0) 20 0000 0000 Fax +44 (0) 20 0000 0000
edfenergy.com
NNB Generation Company (HPC) Limited. Registered in England and Wales. Registered No. 06937084. Registered office: 40 Grosvenor Place, Victoria, London SW1X 7EN
Appendix 1 – Notice
SECTION 153 OF THE PLANNING ACT 2008
PARAGRAPH 2 OF REGULATION 6 OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING (CHANGES TO, AND REVOCATION OF, DEVELOPMENT CONSENT ORDERS) REGULATIONS 2011/2055
NOTICE OF APPLICATION TO MAKE A NON‐MATERIAL CHANGE TO THE FOLLOWING DEVELOPMENT CONSENT ORDER:
The Hinkley Point C (Nuclear Generating Station) Order 2013 (SI 2013:648)
1. The contact details of the applicant are: NNB Generation Company (HPC) Limited (C/o The Qube 90 Whitfield Street, London W1T 4EZ; email: carly.vince@edf‐energy.com).
2. NNB Generation Company (HPC) Limited (referred to in the application and this notice as EDF Energy) is seeking, by way of an application to the Secretary of State, a change to be made to the abovementioned Development Consent Order which is not material.
3. The application seeks to make non‐material changes to elements of the Hinkley Point C main development site as follows:
the redesign of some of the permanent buildings;
the erection of additional pipework along the underside of the temporary jetty to enable discharges from the site;
an alteration to the alignment of the sea wall.
4. The application documents and plans showing the nature and location of the land concerned can be viewed on the Planning Inspectorate’s website: https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/projects/south‐west/hinkley‐point‐c‐new‐nuclear‐power‐station/
5. They can also be inspected, free of charge, at the following locations until 10 November 2017:
West Somerset District Council, West Somerset House, Killick Way, Williton, Taunton, TA4 4QA. Opening hours: Monday to Thursday: 8:30am to 5:00pm, Friday: 8:30am to 4:30pm
EDF Energy Visitor Centre, Angel Place Shopping Centre, Bridgwater, TA6 3TQ. Opening hours: Monday to Friday: 9:30am‐4:00pm, Saturday: 10am‐1pm
Sedgemoor District Council, Bridgwater House, Kings Square, Bridgwater, TA6 3AR. Opening hours: Monday to Friday: 9:00am‐5:00pm
6. A free digital copy of the application can be obtained from EDF Energy using the contact details provided above. Alternatively, a paper copy can be obtained from EDF Energy for £150.
7. Please send any representations about the application by email to: [email protected] or in writing to: Major Applications & Plans, The Planning Inspectorate, Temple Quay House, 2 The Square Temple Quay, Bristol BS1 6PN. Please quote HPC Project – Non‐material change 3 – Main Development Site on any correspondence.
8. The deadline for receipt of representations is 10 November 2017.
1
Clemett Henrietta
From: Vince CarlySent: 07 September 2017 17:04To: Williams Naomi (Energy Development)Subject: Re: Request for more information: Hinkley Point C Project - Application for a further non-
material change application
Hi Naomi Yes sorry for the delay. I can confirm that we will consult those additional stakeholders requested. I anticipate that we will submit the application within the next week to 10 days, but I will keep you updated on our progress. With kind regards, Carly Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. -------- Original message -------- From: "Williams Naomi (Energy Development)" <[email protected]> Date: 07/09/2017 16:14 (GMT+00:00) To: Vince Carly Subject: RE: Request for more information: Hinkley Point C Project - Application for a further non-material change application Hello Carly, I’m have returned to the office and will be taking back responsibility for this NMC application. I’d be really grateful if you would advise whether you are content to include the 32 consultees we have identified set out in Denise’s email below, or whether you intend to provide further details on why these consultees should be excluded from the consultation. I’m working from home tomorrow, so please drop me a line if you would like me to ring you to discuss this. Kind regards, Naomi
3
From: Vince Carly Sent: 24 August 2017 15:21 To: Libretto Denise (Energy Development) Cc: Williams Naomi (Energy Development); Chris White ([email protected]) Subject: Re: Request for more information: Hinkley Point C Project - Application for a further non-material change application Hi Denise Please find attached an updated schedule, which I hope provides you with sufficient information. However if it is not, is there an example of where the information has been provided to a level you are satisfied with, as the level of detail provided originally is comparable to that provided for the BRIA/C non‐material change so I'm not clear on what you are looking for specifically? Many thanks in advance, Carly Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ From: "Libretto Denise (Energy Development)" <[email protected]> Date: 18/08/2017 15:53 (GMT+00:00) To: Vince Carly Cc: "Williams Naomi (Energy Development)" <[email protected]>, "Chris White ([email protected])" <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Request for more information: Hinkley Point C Project ‐ Application for a further non‐material change application
-------- Original message -------- From: "Libretto Denise (Energy Development)" <[email protected]> Date: 18/08/2017 15:53 (GMT+00:00) To: Vince Carly Cc: "Williams Naomi (Energy Development)" <[email protected]>, "Chris White ([email protected])" <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Request for more information: Hinkley Point C Project - Application for a further non-material change application Hi Carly Having checked with colleagues, yes that should be doable if the information provided is adequate. Kind regards Denise
m m m m V
Denise LibrettoHead of Networks and Planning Energy Infrastructure Planning Level 3, Orchard 2 1 Victoria Street London SW1H 0ET E: [email protected] T: 0300 068 5678
Follow us on Twitter.com/DECCgovuk
4
From: Vince Carly Sent: 18 August 2017 14:49 To: Libretto Denise (Energy Development) Cc: Williams Naomi (Energy Development); Chris White ([email protected]) Subject: Re: Request for more information: Hinkley Point C Project - Application for a further non-material change application
Hi Denise Apologies for the delay. If I got you the required information by Tuesday would I be able to get a response by Tuesday 5th September? With kind regards Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. -------- Original message -------- From: "Libretto Denise (Energy Development)" <[email protected]> Date: 18/08/2017 08:53 (GMT+00:00) To: Vince Carly Cc: "Williams Naomi (Energy Development)" <[email protected]>, "Chris White ([email protected])" <[email protected]> Subject: FW: Request for more information: Hinkley Point C Project - Application for a further non-material change application Dear Carly Further to my letter of 8 August 2017 (attached), I would be grateful if you could let me know when the Secretary of State might receive the requested information so that we can then consider and formally respond to your original request as set out in your email of 26 July 2017? I look forward to hearing from you. Kind regards Denise
m m m m V
Denise Libretto Head of Networks and Planning
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and may be protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender and delete the e-mail from your system.
This e-mail has been scanned for malicious content but the internet is inherently insecure and NNB Generation Company (HPC) Limited and NNB Generation Company (SZC) Limited (“the Companies”) cannot accept any liability for the integrity of this message or its attachments. No employee or agent of the Companies or any related company is authorised to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the Companies or any related company by e-mail.
All e-mails sent and received by the Companies are monitored to ensure compliance with the Companies’ information security policies. Executable and script files are not permitted through the Companies’ mail gateway. The Companies do not accept or send mails above 30 Mb in size.
NNB Generation Company (HPC) Limited Registered in England and Wales No. 6937084 Registered Office: 40 Grosvenor Place, London SW1X 7EN
5
NNB Generation Company (SZC) Limited Registered in England and Wales No. 9284825 Registered Office: 40 Grosvenor Place, London SW1X 7EN
______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com ______________________________________________________________________
s.42Category of Consultee
Consultee Category Consultation Body or Consultee Number
Site Name (or note)
1 2 2u J24
1 2 2u J24
42(1)(a) The Welsh Ministers Welsh Ministers Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) The Welsh Ministers Welsh Assembly Government Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) The Relevant Regional Planning Body
South West Strategic Leaders' Board
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y
42(1)(a) The Relevant Strategic Health Authority
South West Strategic Health Authority
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y
42(1)(a) The Health and Safety Executive Health and Safety Executive Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y
42(1)(a) The Relevant Fire and Rescue Authority
Devon & Somerset Fire and Rescue Service
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y
42(1)(a) The Relevant Local Resilience Forum
Avon & Somerset Constabulary
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y
42(1)(a) The Relevant Police Authority Avon & Somerset Constabulary
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y
42(1)(a) The Relevant Police Authority Taunton Police Station Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y42(1)(a) The Relevant Regional
Development Agency South West of England Regional Development Agency
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change
42(1)(a) & 42(1)(d) Dual - The Environment Agency, Waste Regulation Authority and Land Interest
Environment Agency Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y
42(1)(a) & 42(1)(d) Dual - Natural England and Land Interest
Natural England Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y
42(1)(a) The Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment
CABE Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y
42(1)(a) The Equality and Human Rights Commission
The Equality and Human Rights Commission
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no impact on equality or human rights matters, therefore would fall outside the remit of this organisation
42(1)(a) The Commission for Sustainable Development
Sustainable Development Commission
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y
42(1)(a) AONB Conservation Boards Quantock Hills AONB Service*note 1
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y
42(1)(a) AONB Conservation Boards Mendip Hills AONB Unit*note 1
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y
42(1)(a) & 42(1)(d) The Crown Estate Commissioners The Crown Estate Commissioners
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y HPC Development Site, Combwich, Junction 23
42(1)(a) & 42(1)(d) Dual - The Crown Estate Commissioners and Land Interest
The Queen`s Most Excellent Majesty in right of Her Crown (The Crown Estate Commissioners)
Y Y Y Y N N N N HPC Development Site, Combwich
42(1)(a) The Maritime and Coastguard Agency
Maritime and Coastguard Agency
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y
42(1)(a) Marine and Fisheries Agency Marine and Fisheries Agency Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y
42(1)(aa) Marine Management Organisation Marine Management Organisation
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y
42(1)(a) Trinity House Trinity House Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y
42(1)(a) The Relevant internal drainage board
Parrett Internal Drainage Board
Y Y*
Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on watercourses and therefore falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) The Countryside Council for Wales
Countryside Council for Wales Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) The Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historial Monuments of Wales
The Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Wales
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) The Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission for England
English Heritage Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y
42(1)(a) The Commission for Rural Communities
Commission for Rural Communities
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) The Homes and Communities Agency
Homes and Communities Agency
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on housing matters, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Joint Nature Conservation Committee
Joint Nature Conservation Committee
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y
42(1)(a) The Forestry Commission Forestry Commission Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on forestery matters, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) The British Waterways Board British Waterways Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on waterways, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) The Health Protection Agency Health Protection Agency Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y
42(1)(a) & 42(1)(d) The Highways Agency Highways Agency Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y M5 Junction 23 Roundabout
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on the strategic highway network, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) The Civil Aviation Authority Civil Aviation Authority Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on extent of the approved development and therefore falls outside the remit of this stakeholder as there would be no change to an aviation impacts previously had regard to in the approved design
42(1)(a) The Rail Passengers Council Passenger Focus Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on the rail network, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) The Disabled Persons Transport Advisory Committee
Disabled Persons Transport Advisory Committee
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on the transport network, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
Proposed to be consulted for MDS NMC (No.3 NMC for HPC Project)
*note 1 - in the absence of a relevant AONB Conservation Board, EDF Energy has consulted w th the AONB
i
Stages Consulted At (* Returned to Sender)
s.48 Notice Sent
s.42Category of Consultee
Consultee Category Consultation Body or Consultee Number
Site Name (or note)
1 2 2u J24
1 2 2u J24
Proposed to be consulted for MDS NMC (No.3 NMC for HPC Project)Stages Consulted At (* Returned to Sender)
s.48 Notice Sent
42(1)(a) The Office of Rail Regulation and Approved Operators
Office of Rail Regulation Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on the rail network, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Approved Operators Network Rail N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on the rail network, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Approved Operators First Great Western Y Y N**
Y N Y Y Y **Due to errors in the distribution process, it was necessary to obtain a new
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on the rail network, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Approved Operators Direct Rail Services Ltd N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on the rail network, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) The Gas and Electricity Markets Authority
The Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (Ofgem)
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) The Water Services Regulation Authority
Office of Water Services (Ofwat)
Y N N Y N N N Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Relevant Statutory Undertakers Royal Mail Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) & 42(1)(d) Dual - Relevant Statutory Undertakers and Land Interest
Wessex Water Services Limited
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) & 42(1)(d) Dual - Relevant Statutory Undertakers and Land Interest
Wessex Water Services Limited (Land Interest)
Y Y Y N N Y Y N HPC Development Site, A38 Bristol Road/Wylds Road
The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Relevant Statutory Undertakers Wales & West Utilities Limited Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) & 42(1)(d) Dual - Relevant Statutory Undertakers and Land Interest
Western Power Distribution Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) & 42(1)(d) Dual - Relevant Statutory Undertakers and Land Interest
Western Power Distribution Y N N N N N N N The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) & 42(1)(d) Dual - Relevant Statutory Undertakers and Land Interest
British Telecommunications (BT)
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) & 42(1)(d) Dual - Relevant Statutory Undertakers and Land Interest
National Grid Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) & 42(1)(d) Relevant Statutory Undertakers National Grid plc N Y Y N N Y Y N The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) & 42(1)(d) Relevant Statutory Undertakers National Grid Electricity Transmission plc
N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) & 42(1)(d) Dual -Relevant Statutory Undertakers and Land Interest
National Grid Electricity Transmission plc (Land Interest)
N Y Y N N Y Y N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) & 42(1)(d) Dual - Relevant Statutory Undertakers and Land Interest
National Grid Gas plc N Y Y N N Y Y N Combwich, HPC Development Site
The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) & 42(1)(d) Dual - Public Gas Transports and Land Interests
National Grid Gas Plc (NTS) N Y Y Y N Y Y Y Junction 23 The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) & 42(1)(d) Dual - Relevant Statutory Undertakers and Land Interest
RWE Npower plc N Y Y N N Y Y N Combwich The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) & 42(1)(d) Dual - Relevant Statutory Undertakers and Land Interest
British Energy Generation Limited
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) & 42(1)(d) Dual - Relevant Statutory Undertakers and Land Interest
British Energy Generation Limited (Land Interest)
N Y Y N N Y Y N Combwich, HPC Development Site
The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) & 42(1)(d) Dual - Relevant Statutory Undertakers and Land Interest
E.ON UK Plc N Y Y* Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) & 42(1)(d) Dual - Relevant Statutory Undertakers and Land Interest
E.ON UK plc(Land Interest)
N Y Y N N Y Y N Combwich The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Relevant Statutory Undertakers/Public Gas Transports
Scottish and Southern Energy Pipelines
N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Relevant Statutory Undertakers Ovo Energy N Y Y* Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Relevant Statutory Undertakers Scottish Power N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Relevant Statutory Undertakers LoCO2 Energy Ltd N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Relevant Statutory Undertakers Spark Energy Limited N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Relevant Statutory Undertakers Ecotricity Group Limited N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Relevant Statutory Undertakers Opus Energy Limited N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Relevant Statutory Undertakers Good Energy N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Relevant Statutory Undertakers Centrica plc N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Relevant Statutory Undertakers Orange UK Plc N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Relevant Statutory Undertakers Plusnet N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Relevant Statutory Undertakers TalkTalk N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Relevant Statutory Undertakers Virgin Media N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Relevant Statutory Undertakers British Sky Broadcasting Limited
N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Relevant Statutory Undertakers Eclipse Internet N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Relevant Statutory Undertakers Telefónica O2 UK Limited N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Relevant Statutory Undertakers Bristol Water plc N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Relevant Statutory Undertakers South West Water N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Relevant Statutory Undertakers Southern Gas Networks N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Relevant Statutory Undertakers BRB Residuary Limited N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Dock Sharpness Dock N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Dock Gloucester Harbour Trustees N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Dock The Bristol Port Company N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Harbour CF Spencer & Co Ltd (Harbour Master for the Port of Bridgwater)
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Licence Holder (Chapter 1 Of Part 1 Of Transport Act 2000)
NATS En Route Plc N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Public Gas Transports British Gas Pipelines Limited N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Public Gas Transports Energetics Electricity Limited N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
s.42Category of Consultee
Consultee Category Consultation Body or Consultee Number
Site Name (or note)
1 2 2u J24
1 2 2u J24
Proposed to be consulted for MDS NMC (No.3 NMC for HPC Project)Stages Consulted At (* Returned to Sender)
s.48 Notice Sent
42(1)(a) Public Gas Transports Energetics Gas Limited N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Public Gas Transports/Electricity Distributors With CPO Powers
Es Pipelines Ltd/ESP Connections Ltd/ESP Electricity Limited/ESP Networks Limited/ESP Pipelines Limited
N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Public Gas Transports Fulcrum Pipelines Limited N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Public Gas Transports GTC Pipelines Limited N Y*
Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Public Gas Transports Independent Pipelines Limited N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Public Gas Transports Intoto Utilities Limited N Y*
Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Public Gas Transports Northern Gas Networks Limited
N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Public Gas Transports Quadrant Pipelines Limited N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Public Gas Transports Scotland Gas Networks Plc N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Public Gas Transports Sp Gas Limited N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Public Gas Transports The Gas Transportation Company Limited
N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Public Gas Transports Utility Grid Installations Limited
N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Public Gas Transports Severn Gas Transportation Limited
N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Electricity Distributors With CPO Powers
Energetics Electricity Limited N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Electricity Distributors With CPO Powers
Independent Power Networks Limited
N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Electricity Distributors With CPO Powers
The Electricity Network Company Limited
N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Electricity Distributors With CPO Powers
ECG (Distribution) N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Electricity Transmitters with CPO Powers
Sp Transmission Limited N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(a) Relevant Statutory Undertakers Easynet Telecom N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no changes to any utility providers given the nature and scale of the changes, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
42(1)(b) Relevant Local Authority West Somerset Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y
42(1)(b) & 42(1)(d) Dual - Relevant Local Authority and Land Interest
Sedgemoor District Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y A39 Broadway/A38 Taunton Road, Wembdon Rise, Bridgwater C
42(1)(a), 42(1)(b) & 42(1)(d)
Dual - Relevant Highways Authority, Relevant Local Authority and Land Interest
Somerset County Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Bridgwater A, Junction 24, Wembdon Rise, Huntworth Roundabout, NDR/Chilton Street, A39 Broadway/Eastover, A38 Broadway/West Street,
42(1)(b) Relevant Local Authority Exmoor National Park Authority
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(b) Relevant Local Authority South Somerset District Council
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(b) Relevant Local Authority Mendip District Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(b) Relevant Local Authority North Somerset District Council
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(b) Relevant Local Authority North Devon Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(b) Relevant Local Authority Mid Devon District Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(b) Relevant Local Authority Taunton Deane Borough Council
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(b) Relevant Local Authority Bristol City Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(b) Relevant Local Authority South Gloucestershire Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(b) Relevant Local Authority Vale of Glamorgan Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(b) Relevant Local Authority Devon County Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(b) Relevant Local Authority Dorset County Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(b) Relevant Local Authority West Dorset District Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(b) Relevant Local Authority North Dorset District Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(b) Relevant Local Authority Wiltshire Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(b) Relevant Local Authority East Devon District Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(b) Relevant Local Authority Bath & North East Somerset Council
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Ashcott Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Axbridge Town Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Badgworth Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Barry Town Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Bawdrip Parish Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Berrow Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Bicknoller Parish Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Brean Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Brent Knoll Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) & 42(1)(d) Relevant Parish Council Bridgwater Town Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
s.42Category of Consultee
Consultee Category Consultation Body or Consultee Number
Site Name (or note)
1 2 2u J24
1 2 2u J24
Proposed to be consulted for MDS NMC (No.3 NMC for HPC Project)Stages Consulted At (* Returned to Sender)
s.48 Notice Sent
42(1)(a) & 42(1)(d) Dual - Relevant Parish Council and Land Interest
Bridgwater Town Council(Land Interest)
Y Y Y N N Y Y Y Cannington Flood Allivation Channel, Bridgwater B
The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Bridgwater Without Parish Council
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Brompton Ralph Parish Council
N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Brompton Regis Parish Council
N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Broomfield Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Brushford Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Burnham Without Parish Council
Y Y Y Y* N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Burnham-on-Sea and Highbridge Town Council
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Burtle Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Cannington Parish Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Carhampton Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Chapel Allerton Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Cheddar Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Chedzoy Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Chiltern Trinity Parish Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Chilton Polden Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Clatworthy Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Compton Bishop Parish Council
N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Cossington Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Crowcombe Parish Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Cutcombe Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Dulverton Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Dunster Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Durleigh Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council East Brent Parish Council N Y Y* Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council East Huntspill Parish Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council East Quantoxhead Parish Council
N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Edington Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Elworthy Parish Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Enmore Parish Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Exford Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Fiddington Parish Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Goathurst Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Holford Parish Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Huish Champflower Parish Council
N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Klive Parish Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Luccombe Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Luxborough Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Lympsham Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Lyng Parish Council N Y Y* Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Mark Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Middlezoy Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Minehead Town Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Monksilver Parish Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Nether Stowey Parish Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Nettlecombe Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council North Petherton Town Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Oare Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Old Cleve Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Othery Parish Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Otterhampton Parish Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Over Stowey Parish Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Pawlett Parish Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Porlock Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Puriton Parish Council Y Y Y Y* N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Sampford Brett Parish Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Selworthy & Minehead Parish Without Council
N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
s.42Category of Consultee
Consultee Category Consultation Body or Consultee Number
Site Name (or note)
1 2 2u J24
1 2 2u J24
Proposed to be consulted for MDS NMC (No.3 NMC for HPC Project)Stages Consulted At (* Returned to Sender)
s.48 Notice Sent
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Shapwick Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Shipham Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Skilgate Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Spaxton Parish Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Stawell Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Stockland Bristol Parish Council
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Stogumber Parish Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposals would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Stogursey Parish Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Stringston Parish Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Thurloxton Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Timberscombe Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Treborough Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Upton Parish Council N Y Y Y* N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Watchet Town Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Weare Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Wedmore Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Wembdon Parish Council Y Y*
Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council West Huntspill Parish Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council West Quantoxhead Parish Council
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Western-super-Mare Parish Council
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Westonzoyland Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Williton Parish Council Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Winsford Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Withycombe Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Withypool & Hawkridge Parish Council
N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Woolavington Parish Council N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(a) Relevant Parish Council Wootton Courtenay Parish Council
N Y Y Y N Y Y Y The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
223 N N Y N N N Y N Bridgwater A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
224 Y Y Y N N Y N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
226 Y N N N N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
227 Y N N N N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
228 Y N N N N N N N Cannington The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
229 Y N N N N N N N Cannington The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Innovia Films Limited Y Y Y N N Y Y N Bridgwater A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Bridgwater Sports and Social Club
Y Y Y N N Y Y N Bridgwater A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Bridgwater and Albion Rugby Football Club Limited
Y Y Y N N Y Y N Bridgwater C The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
234 N Y Y N N Y Y N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
235 N Y*
N N N Y N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Judgeproud Limited N Y Y N N Y Y N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Barrington Scholfield Solicitors N Y Y N N Y Y N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
238 N Y N N N Y N N Cannington Flood Alleviation
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
239 N Y N N N Y N N Cannington Flood Alleviation
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Brymore School of Rural Technology
Y Y Y N N Y Y N Cannington Flood Alleviation Channel,
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
241 N Y N N N Y N N Cannington Flood Alleviation Channel
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
242 N Y N N N Y N N Cannington Flood Alleviation Channel
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
243 N Y N N N Y N N Cannington Flood Alleviation Channel
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
244 Y Y N N N Y N N Cannington Flood Alleviation Channel
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
245 Y Y Y N N Y Y N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
British Nuclear Fuels Limited N Y Y N N Y Y N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Ronald Charles Scurr N Y Y N N Y Y N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
s.42Category of Consultee
Consultee Category Consultation Body or Consultee Number
Site Name (or note)
1 2 2u J24
1 2 2u J24
Proposed to be consulted for MDS NMC (No.3 NMC for HPC Project)Stages Consulted At (* Returned to Sender)
s.48 Notice Sent
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Miller Turner Investment N Y Y Y N Y Y N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
250 N Y Y Y N Y Y N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
252 N Y Y N N Y Y N Junction 23 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Bowerings Animal Feeds Limited
Y Y Y N N Y Y N Junction 23 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Penny Lane Foods Limited N Y Y N N Y Y N Junction 23 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
255 N Y N N N Y N N Williton The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
256 N Y N N N Y N N Williton The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
257 N Y N N N Y N N Williton The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Akzo Nobel Films (Holdings) Limited
N Y N N N Y N N Bridgwater A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
BFF (Realisations) Limited N Y Y N N Y Y N Bridgwater A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
British Cellophane Limited N Y N N N Y N N Bridgwater A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Shell-Mex and BP Limited N Y Y N N Y Y N Bridgwater A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
ER Bridgwater LLP N Y Y N N Y Y N Bridgwater C The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Safeway Stores Limited N Y N N N Y N N Cross Rifles Roundabout
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
BDW Trading Limited N Y Y N N Y Y N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
266 N Y N N N Y N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Bridgwater Angling Association Limited
N Y Y N N Y Y N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Bridgwater Bay Wildfowlers Association
N Y N N N Y N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
269 Y Y Y N N Y Y N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
270 N Y Y N N Y Y N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
271 N Y Y N N Y Y N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
272 N Y Y N N Y Y N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
273 N Y Y N N Y Y N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
274 N Y Y N N Y Y N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
275 N Y Y N N Y Y N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
276 N Y Y N N Y Y N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
277 N Y Y N N Y Y N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
278 N Y Y N N Y Y N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
279 N Y Y N N Y Y N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
280 N Y Y N N Y Y N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
281 N Y Y N N Y Y N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
282 N N Y N N N Y N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
283 N N Y N N N Y N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
British Car Auctions Limited Y Y Y N N Y Y N Junction 23 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
285 N Y Y N N Y Y N Junction 23 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
AB Agri Limited N Y Y N N Y Y N Junction 23 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Associated British Foods plc N Y N N N Y N N Junction 23 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
J Bibby Agriculture Limited N Y Y N N Y Y N Junction 23 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
289 N Y Y N N Y Y N Junction 23 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
290 N Y Y N N Y Y N Junction 23 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Causeway 4x4 Limited N Y Y N N Y Y N Junction 23 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
G & S Fruit Supplies N Y Y N N Y Y N Junction 23 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Mueller Primaflow Limited N Y Y N N Y Y N Junction 23 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
P.A.W Engineering N Y Y N N Y Y N Junction 23 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Polham Controls Limited N Y Y N N Y Y N Junction 23 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Viskie Limited N Y Y N N Y Y N Junction 23 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
297 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
298 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
299 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
300 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
301 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
302 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
s.42Category of Consultee
Consultee Category Consultation Body or Consultee Number
Site Name (or note)
1 2 2u J24
1 2 2u J24
Proposed to be consulted for MDS NMC (No.3 NMC for HPC Project)Stages Consulted At (* Returned to Sender)
s.48 Notice Sent
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
303 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
304 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
305 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
306 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
307 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
308 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
309 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
310 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
311 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
312 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
313 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
314 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
315 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
316 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
317 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
318 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
319 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
320 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
321 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
322 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
323 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
324 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
325 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
326 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
327 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
328 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
329 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
330 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
331 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
332 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
333 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
334 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
335 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
336 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
337 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
338 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
339 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
340 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
341 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
342 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
s.42Category of Consultee
Consultee Category Consultation Body or Consultee Number
Site Name (or note)
1 2 2u J24
1 2 2u J24
Proposed to be consulted for MDS NMC (No.3 NMC for HPC Project)Stages Consulted At (* Returned to Sender)
s.48 Notice Sent
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
343 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
344 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
345 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
346 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
347 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
348 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
349 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
350 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
351 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
352 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
353 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
354 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
355 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
356 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
357 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
358 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
359 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
360 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
361 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
362 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
363 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
364 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
365 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
366 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
367 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
368 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
369 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
370 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
371 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
372 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
373 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
374 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
375 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
376 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
377 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
378 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
379 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
380 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
381 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
382 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
383 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
384 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
385 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
386 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
387 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
388 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
389 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
390 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
391 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
392 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
393 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
394 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
s.42Category of Consultee
Consultee Category Consultation Body or Consultee Number
Site Name (or note)
1 2 2u J24
1 2 2u J24
Proposed to be consulted for MDS NMC (No.3 NMC for HPC Project)Stages Consulted At (* Returned to Sender)
s.48 Notice Sent
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
395 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
396 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
397 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
398 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
399 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
400 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
401 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
402 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
403 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
404 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
405 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
406 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
407 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
408 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
409 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
410 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
411 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
412 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
413 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
414 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
415 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
416 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
417 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
418 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
419 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
420 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
421 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
422 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
423 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
424 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
425 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
426 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
427 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
428 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
429 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
430 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
431 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
432 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
433 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
434 N Y*
Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
435 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
436 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
437 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
438 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
439 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
440 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
441 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
442 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
443 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
444 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
445 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
446 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
447 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
448 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
449 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
450 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
s.42Category of Consultee
Consultee Category Consultation Body or Consultee Number
Site Name (or note)
1 2 2u J24
1 2 2u J24
Proposed to be consulted for MDS NMC (No.3 NMC for HPC Project)Stages Consulted At (* Returned to Sender)
s.48 Notice Sent
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
451 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
452 Y Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
453 Y Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
454 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
455 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
456 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
457 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
458 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
459 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
460 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
461 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
462 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
463 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
464 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
465 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
466 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
467 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
468 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
469 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
470 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
471 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
472 N Y*
Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
473 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
474 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
475 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
476 N Y Y* N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
477 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
478 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
479 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
480 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
481 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
482 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
483 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
484 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
485 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
486 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
487 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
488 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
489 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
490 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
491 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
492 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
493 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
494 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
495 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
496 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
497 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
498 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
499 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
500 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
501 N N Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
502 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
503 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
504 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
s.42Category of Consultee
Consultee Category Consultation Body or Consultee Number
Site Name (or note)
1 2 2u J24
1 2 2u J24
Proposed to be consulted for MDS NMC (No.3 NMC for HPC Project)Stages Consulted At (* Returned to Sender)
s.48 Notice Sent
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
505 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
506 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
507 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
508 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
509 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
510 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
511 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
512 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
513 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
514 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
515 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
516 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
517 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
518 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
519 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
520 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
521 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
522 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
523 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
524 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
525 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
526 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
527 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
528 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
529 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
530 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
531 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
532 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
533 N Y Y Y* N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
534 N Y Y Y N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
535 N Y Y Y* N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
536 N Y Y Y N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
537 N Y Y Y N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
538 N Y Y Y N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
539 N Y Y Y N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
540 N Y Y Y N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
541 N Y Y Y N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
542 N Y Y Y N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
543 N Y Y Y N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
544 N Y Y Y N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
545 N Y Y Y N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
546 N Y Y Y N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
547 N Y Y Y N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
548 N Y Y Y* N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
549 N Y Y Y* N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
550 N Y Y Y* N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
s.42Category of Consultee
Consultee Category Consultation Body or Consultee Number
Site Name (or note)
1 2 2u J24
1 2 2u J24
Proposed to be consulted for MDS NMC (No.3 NMC for HPC Project)Stages Consulted At (* Returned to Sender)
s.48 Notice Sent
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
551 N Y Y Y* N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
552 N Y Y Y* N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
553 N Y Y Y N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
554 N Y Y Y N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
555 N Y Y Y N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
556 N Y Y Y N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
557 N Y Y Y* N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
558 N Y Y Y N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
559 N Y Y Y N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
560 N Y Y Y* N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
561 N Y Y Y* N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
562 N Y Y Y N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
563 N Y Y Y N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
564 N Y Y Y N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
565 N Y Y Y* N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
566 N Y Y Y* N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
567 N Y Y Y N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
568 N Y Y Y* N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
569 N Y Y Y* N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
570 N Y Y Y* N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
571 N Y Y Y* N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
571 N Y*
Y Y N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
573 N Y Y Y* N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
574 N Y Y Y* N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
575 N Y Y Y* N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
576 N Y Y Y N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
577 N Y Y Y N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
578 N Y N N N N N N Williton A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
579 N Y N N N N N N Williton A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
580 N Y N N N N N N Williton A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
581 N Y N N N N N N Williton A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
582 N Y N N N N N N Williton A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
583 N Y N N N N N N Williton A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
584 N Y N N N N N N Williton A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
585 N Y N N N N N N Williton A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
586 N Y N N N N N N Williton A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
587 N Y N N N N N N Williton A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
588 N Y N N N N N N Williton A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
589 N Y N N N N N N Williton A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
590 N Y N N N N N N Williton A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
591 N Y N N N N N N Williton A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
592 N Y N N N N N N Williton A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
593 N Y N N N N N N Williton A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
594 N Y N N N N N N Williton A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
595 N Y N N N N N N Williton A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
596 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
597 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
598 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
599 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
600 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
601 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
602 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
603 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
604 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
605 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
606 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
607 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
608 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
609 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
610 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
s.42Category of Consultee
Consultee Category Consultation Body or Consultee Number
Site Name (or note)
1 2 2u J24
1 2 2u J24
Proposed to be consulted for MDS NMC (No.3 NMC for HPC Project)Stages Consulted At (* Returned to Sender)
s.48 Notice Sent
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
611 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
612 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
613 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
614 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
615 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
616 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Mortgagee The Royal Bank of Scotland N.V
N Y Y Y N N N N Bridgwater A, Quantock Roundabout
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Mortgagee Heineken UK Limited N Y Y N N N N N Bridgwater C The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Mortgagee Lloyds TSB Bank plc N Y Y Y N N N N Bridgwater C, Junction 23, Cannington Bypass, A39 B A3
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Mortgagee Bank of Scotland plc N Y Y Y N N N N Cannington Bypass, Quantock Roundabout
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Mortgagee Mortgage Express N Y Y Y N N N N Junction 23 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Bridgwater College Y Y Y N N N N N Bridgwater C, Combwich
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Bridgwater Town Football Club Y Y Y N N N N N Bridgwater C The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
625 Y Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride, Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
626 Y Y Y N N N N N Cannington The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
627 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride, Cannington Flood Alleviation
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
628 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride, Cannington Flood Alleviation
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
629 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
630 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
631 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
The Clifford Estate Company Limited
Y Y Y N N N N N Combwich, Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
633 Y Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
634 Y Y Y N N N N N Junction 23 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
635 Y Y Y N N N N N Junction 23 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
636 Y Y Y N N N N N Junction 23 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
637 Y Y Y N N N N N Junction 23 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
638 Y Y Y N N N N N Junction 23 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
639 Y Y Y N N N N N Junction 23 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
640 Y Y Y N N N N N Junction 23 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
641 N Y Y N N N N N Junction 23 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
642 Y Y Y N N N N N Junction 23 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
643 N Y Y N N N N N Junction 23 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Brookridge Timber Limited N Y Y N N N N N Junction 23 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
645 Y Y Y N N N N N Junction 23 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
646 N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Castle Hill Quarry Co. Limited Y Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
648 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
649 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
650 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
651 N Y Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Persimmon Homes South West Limited
Y Y Y Y N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Mead Realisations Limited N Y Y Y N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
The Wyndham Estate N Y Y N N N N N Williton A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
s.42Category of Consultee
Consultee Category Consultation Body or Consultee Number
Site Name (or note)
1 2 2u J24
1 2 2u J24
Proposed to be consulted for MDS NMC (No.3 NMC for HPC Project)Stages Consulted At (* Returned to Sender)
s.48 Notice Sent
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
The Secretary of State forTransport
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Junction 24, A39 Broadway/Taunton Road, Huntworth Roundabout, Junction 24, M5 Junction 23 Roundabout, Cross Rifles Roundabout, HPC Development Site
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Dual - Land Interest and Non-Stat Department of Environment and Climate Change
N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
656 Y Y Y Y N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Dual - Land Interest and Non-Stat Magnox South Limited Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
658 Y Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
658 Y Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
659 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
660 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
661 N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
662 Y Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Dual - Non Stat and Land Interest Nuclear Liabilities Fund N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Dual - Non Stat and Land Interest Nuclear Decommissioning Authority
N Y Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Imperial (South West) Ltd Y N N Y N N N N Bridgwater B The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
668 Y N N N N N N N Bridgwater B The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Trustees of the Marketlux Executive Pension
Y N N N N N N N Bridgwater B The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Ministerial Correspondence Unit, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
N N Y N N N N N Bridgwater C The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Wiseman Dairies N N Y Y N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
673 Y N N N N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
674 N N Y N N N N N Cross Rifles Roundabout
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Unique Pub Properties Limited N N Y N N N N N Cross Rifles Roundabout
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
677 Y N N N N N N N Cross Rifles Roundabout
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) as Mortgagee Commerzbank Aktiengesellschaft
N N Y N N N N N Washford Cross Roundabout
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
J Sainsburys N N Y N N N N N Cross Rifles Roundabout
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Capita Trust Company Limited N N Y Y N N N N Cross Rifles Roundabout
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
812 Y N N N N N N N Cross Rifles Roundabout
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
The Occupier N Y Y N N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
814 N N Y N N N N N Washford Cross Roundabout
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
815 N N Y N N N N N Washford Cross Roundabout
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
B.L.C.T. (12671) LIMITED N N Y N N N N N Cross Rifles Roundabout
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Halberton Poultry Limited N N Y N N N N N Claylands Corner
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
818 Y N N N N N N N Claylands Corner
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
819 N N Y N N N N N Cross Rifles Roundabout
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
820 N N Y N N N N N Cross Rifles Roundabout
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
821 N Y Y N N N N N Cross Rifles Roundabout
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
JCDecaux Limited N N Y N N N N N Cross Rifles Roundabout
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
823 N N Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
J Gliddon & Sons Ltd Y N N N N N N N Williton The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
827 Y N N N N N N N Cannington Park and Ride
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
828 Y N N N N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Arqiva Services Limited N N Y N N N N N Washford Cross Roundabout
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Junction 24 Limited N N Y Y N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Fear and Hawkins Limited N N Y Y N N N N Junction 23 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
s.42Category of Consultee
Consultee Category Consultation Body or Consultee Number
Site Name (or note)
1 2 2u J24
1 2 2u J24
Proposed to be consulted for MDS NMC (No.3 NMC for HPC Project)Stages Consulted At (* Returned to Sender)
s.48 Notice Sent
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
832 N N Y Y N N N N Junction 23 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc
N N Y N N N N N Cross Rifles Roundabout
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
834 Y N N N N N N N Williton The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
836 N N Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
837 N N Y N N N N N Claylands Corner
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
837 N N Y N N N N N Claylands Corner
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Mole Valley Farmers Limited Y N N N N N N N Bridgwater B The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
842 Y Y Y Y N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Sanctuary Housing Association
N N Y N N N N N Cross Rifles Roundabout
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Kenmore (Bridgwater) LLP Y N Y N N N N N Bridgwater A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
845 N N Y N N N N N Williton The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
846 N N Y N N N N N Claylands Corner
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
847 N N Y N N N N N Claylands Corner
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
848 N N Y N N N N N Claylands Corner
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
849 N N Y N N N N N HPC Development Site
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
850 N N Y Y N N N N Claylands Corner
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
851 Y Y Y N N N N N Junction 23 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Secretary of State for Defence Y N N N N N N N HPC Development Site
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
853 N N Y N N N N N Williton The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
854 Y N N N N N N N Williton The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
855 Y Y Y Y N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Falcon Prop Co Ltd Y Y Y N N N N N Junction 23 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
859 N N Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
860 N N Y N N N N N Cannington Bypass
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) As Mortgagee HSBC N N Y N N N N N The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Tropiquaria Limited N N Y N N N N N Washford Cross Roundabout
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
863 N N Y N N N N N Washford Cross Roundabout
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
864 N N Y N N N N N Williton The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
865 N N Y N N N N N Williton The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
BPI N N Y N N N N N Bridgwater A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Comfi Living Partnership N N Y N N N N N Bridgwater A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
PJB Electrical N N Y N N N N N Bridgwater A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
First Food Projects Ltd N N Y N N N N N Bridgwater A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Sia Base.com N N Y N N N N N Bridgwater A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
BOCM Pauls Ltd N N Y N N N N N Bridgwater A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Micron Biosystems Ltd N N Y N N N N N Bridgwater A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
L.C.P. Securities Limited N N N Y N N N N A38 Bristol Road/Wylds Road
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
CSM Motor Properties Limited N N N Y N N N N A38 Bristol Road/Wylds Road
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
I/S Scandinavian Property Investment 4
N N N Y N N N N A38 Bristol Road/Wylds Road
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
P J S Properties Limited N N N Y N N N N A38 Bristol Road/Wylds Road
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
877 N N N Y N N N N A38 Bristol Road/Wylds Road
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Autofit (Bridgwater) Limited N N N Y N N N N A38 Bristol Road/Wylds Road
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Matalan Retail Limited N N N Y N N N N A38 Bristol Road/Wylds Road
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
880 N N N Y N N N N Wylds Road/The Drove Junction
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Rathbone Pension & Advisory Services (Trustees) Limited
N N N Y N N N N Wylds Road/The Drove Junction
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Riders of Bridgwater Limited N N N Y N N N N Wylds Road/The Drove Junction
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
CRC Industries UK Limited N N N Y N N N N Wylds Road/The Drove Junction
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
884 N N N Y N N N N Quantock Roundabout
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
s.42Category of Consultee
Consultee Category Consultation Body or Consultee Number
Site Name (or note)
1 2 2u J24
1 2 2u J24
Proposed to be consulted for MDS NMC (No.3 NMC for HPC Project)Stages Consulted At (* Returned to Sender)
s.48 Notice Sent
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
885 N N N Y N N N N Quantock Roundabout
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
886 N N N Y* N N N N Quantock Roundabout
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
887 N N N Y N N N N Quantock Roundabout
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
888 N N N Y N N N N Quantock Roundabout
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Moto Hospitality Limited N N N Y N N N N Huntworth Roundabout
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
890 N N N Y N N N N A38 Bristol Road/The Drove Junction
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Somerset Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
N N N Y N N N N A39 Broadway/Eastover
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Hornington Investments Limited
N N N Y N N N N A39 Broadway/Eastover
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Alton and Farnham Properties Limited
N N N Y N N N N A39 Broadway/Eastover
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Smart Tiger Investments Limited
N N N Y N N N N A39 Broadway/Eastover
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
895 N N N Y N N N N A39 Broadway/Eastover
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
896 N N N Y N N N N A39 Broadway/Eastover
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Aldi Stores Limited N N N Y N N N N A39 Broadway/Eastover
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Monmouth Street Estates Limited
N N N Y N N N N A39 Broadway/Eastover
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
899 N N N Y* N N N N A39 Broadway/Eastover
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Insite Poster Investments (A) Limited
N N N Y N N N N A39 Broadway/Eastover
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
901 N N N Y N N N N A39 Broadway/West Street
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
902 N N N Y N N N N A39 Broadway/West Street
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
903 N N N Y N N N N A39 Broadway/West Street
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
904 N N N Y N N N N A39 Broadway/West Street
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
905 N N N Y N N N N M5 Junction 24
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance plc
N N N Y N N N N A38 Taunton Road/Marsh Lane, Junction 24
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Somerfield Stores Limitedc/o Co-operative Legal Services Limited
N N N Y N N N N Junction 24, A38 Taunton Road/Marsh Lane
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
908 N N N Y N N N N M5 Junction 24
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
909 N N N Y N N N N M5 Junction 25
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) as Mortgagee Clydesdale Bank plc N N N Y N N N N A38 Bristol Road/Wylds Road
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) as Mortgagee Morgan Stanley Mortgage Servicing Limited
N N N Y N N N N A38 Bristol Road/Wylds Road
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) as Mortgagee Newcastle Building Society N N N Y N N N N Quantock Roundabout
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) as Mortgagee Nationwide Building Society N N N Y N N N N Quantock Roundabout
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) as Mortgagee The Mortgage Works (UK) plc N N N Y N N N N A38 Bristol/The Drove
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) as Mortgagee Southern Pacific Mortgage Company
N N N Y N N N N A39 Broadway/West Street
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) as Mortgagee Black Horse Limited N N N Y N N N N A39 Broadway/West Street
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) as Mortgagee Bradford & Bingley plc N N N Y N N N N A39 Broadway/West Street
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) as Mortgagee The Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland
N N N Y N N N N Wylds Road/The Drove
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) as Mortgagee P S J Properties Limited N N N Y N N N N Wylds Road/The Drove
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) as Mortgagee Svenska Handelsbanken AB (publ)
N N N Y N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) as Mortgagee Pantra Finance Inc N N N Y N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
EDF Development Company Limited
Y Y Y Y N N N N HPC Development Site
42(1)(d) as Mortgagee National Westminster Bank plc N Y Y Y N N N N Cannington Bypass, Junction 23, Bristol Road/Wylds Road A39
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Dual - Land Interest and Non-Stat Combwich Motor Boat and Sailing Club
Y Y Y Y N N N N Combwich The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Dual - Land Interest and Non-Stat Hallam Land Management Y N Y N N N N N Bridgwater A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
s.42Category of Consultee
Consultee Category Consultation Body or Consultee Number
Site Name (or note)
1 2 2u J24
1 2 2u J24
Proposed to be consulted for MDS NMC (No.3 NMC for HPC Project)Stages Consulted At (* Returned to Sender)
s.48 Notice Sent
42(1)(d) Dual - Land Interest and Non-Stat S. Notaro Holdings Ltd Y N Y Y N N N N Bridgwater D The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Dual - Land Interest and Non-Stat Bloor Homes Ltd N N N Y N N N N Bridgwater A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Landowner or Potentially Significantly Affected Persons
Summerfield Developments (SW) Ltd
N N N Y N N N N Junction 24 The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
42(1)(d) Dual - Land Interest and Non-Stat David Wilson Homes Y N N N N N N N Bridgwater B The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
- Non-Stat Stop Hinkley Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
- Non-Stat Sustainability South West Y Y Y Y N/ N/A N/ N/
- Non-Stat The Environmental Network of North Somerset (TENONS)
Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
- Non-Stat West Hinkley Action Group Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
- Non-Stat West Somerset Climate Change Society
N N N N N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
- Non-Stat Parents Concerned About Hinkley
Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
- Non-Stat South West Chambers of Commerce
Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on employment, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat GWE Business West Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on employment, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat South West Country Land and Business Association
Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on employment, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Somerset Chamber of Commerce & Industry
Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on employment, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Into Somerset Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on employment, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Minehead & District Chamber of Commerce
Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
- Non-Stat Burnham-on-Sea Chamber of Commerce and Trade
Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
- Non-Stat Bridgwater Chamber of Commerce
Y Y Y Y* N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
- Non-Stat Taunton Chamber of Commerce
Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
- Non-Stat Williton Chamber of C
Y Y Y Y N/ N/A N/ N/ The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from h k h l ' j i i i- Non-Stat Watchet Chamber of
CommerceY Y Y Y N/
AN/A N/
AN/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
- Non-Stat Business Link Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on employment, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Country Land & Business Association (CLA)
Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on employment, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Job centre Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on employment, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Bridgwater Job Centre Plus Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on employment, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Connexions Centre Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on employment, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Citizens Advice Bureau Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on employment, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Pontins Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on tourism, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Butlins Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on tourism, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Urban Splash Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding
- Non-Stat Tamlyn & Sons Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on employment, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Recruitment South West Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on employment, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat IBM (UK) ltd Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on employment, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat BAM Construct UK Y Y Y Y N/ N/A N/ N/ The proposed changes would have no direct impact on employment, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat JMP Consultants Ltd N Y Y Y N/ N/A N/ N/ The proposed changes would have no direct impact on employment, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Government Office for the South West
Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
- Non-Stat Somerset Strategic Partnership
Y Y Y N N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
- Non-Stat Community Council for Somerset
N Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
- Non-Stat Hinkley Point Site Stakeholder Group (A+B Site)
Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
- Non-Stat Severn Estuary Partnership Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on employment, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Exmoor Tourist Association Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on tourism, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Somerset Tourism Association Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on tourism, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Somerset Archaeological and Natural History Society
Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on arcaheology, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Bridgwater & District Archaeological Society
Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
- Non-Stat Bridgwater & District Civic Society
Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
- Non-Stat Bridgwater Tourist Information Centre
Y Y N Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
- Non-Stat Bridgwater Forward N Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on employment, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Bridgwater Challenge Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on employment, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Burnham Boat Owners Sea Angling Association
N Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
- Non-Stat Stogursey & District Parish Plan Steering Committee
Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
- Non-Stat Cannington Women's Institute N Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the stakeholder's jurisdiction
- Non-Stat Greenpeace Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
- Non-Stat Friends of the Earth (Taunton) Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
- Non-Stat Friends of Quantocks Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
- Non-Stat Sedgemoor and West Somerset Green Party
Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
- Non-Stat Forum 21 Y Y Y Y N/ N/A N/ N/
- Non-Stat RSPB Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
- Non-Stat National Farmers' Union N Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
- Non-Stat Ramblers Association (West Somerset)
Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
- Non-Stat Somerset Trust Badger Group Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
s.42Category of Consultee
Consultee Category Consultation Body or Consultee Number
Site Name (or note)
1 2 2u J24
1 2 2u J24
Proposed to be consulted for MDS NMC (No.3 NMC for HPC Project)Stages Consulted At (* Returned to Sender)
s.48 Notice Sent
- Non-Stat Somerset Bat Group Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
- Non-Stat Somerset Wildlife Trust Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
- Non-Stat Cannington C of E Primary School
Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on the education or training, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Chilton Trinity Technology College
Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on the education or training, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Danesfield C of E School Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on the education or training, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat East Bridgwater Community School
Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on the education or training, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Haygrove Secondary School Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on the education or training, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat National Skills Academy - Nuclear
Y Y N N N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on the education or training, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Nether Stowey C of E Primary School
Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on the education or training, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Otterhampton Primary School Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on the education or training, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Robert Blake Science College Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on the education or training, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Somerset College of Arts & Technology
Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on the education or training, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Dorset & Somerset Learning & Skills Council
Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on the education or training, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Bristol University Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on the education or training, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Cambridge University Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on the education or training, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Imperial College London Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on the education or training, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Cardiff University Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on the education or training, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Smallpeice Trust Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on the education or training, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Bridgwater Education Trust Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes are outside of the area of interest of the stakeholder and would have no impact on that stakeholder
- Non-Stat Stogursey C of E Primary School
Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes are outside of the area of interest of the stakeholder and would have no impact on that stakeholder
- Non-Stat West Somerset Community College
Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes are outside of the area of interest of the stakeholder and would have no impact on that stakeholder
- Non-Stat Cannington Centre for Land-based Studies
Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes are outside of the area of interest of the stakeholder and would have no impact on that stakeholder
- Non-Stat NHS Somerset Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on health provision or effects, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat South Western Ambulance Service NHS Trust
Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on health provision or effects, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Dorset & Somerset Health Protection Unit
Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on health provision or effects, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Nuclear Industry Association Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
- Non-Stat The Office of Civil Nuclear Security (OCNS)
Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
- Non-Stat The Nuclear Installations Inspectorate (NII) now the Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR)
Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
- Non-Stat Civil Nuclear Constabulary Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
- Non-Stat Hinkley Point A Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
- Non-Stat Hinkley Point B Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
- Non-Stat NuLeAF Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
- Non-Stat NSAN Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes are outside of the area of interest of the stakeholder and would have no impact on that stakeholder
- Non-Stat The Local Government Association
Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
- Non-Stat Government Office for the South West
Y Y N N N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
- Non-Stat Ministry of Defence Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
- Non-Stat English Welsh and Scottish Railway
Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on the rail network, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Food Standards Agency Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on food practices, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors
Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
- Non-Stat Institute of Mechanical Engineers
Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on activities of engineers, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat The Welding Institute Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on welding, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat South West Planning Aid Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
- Non-Stat Community Sport in Somerset Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on swimming actvities, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Bridgwater Swimming Club Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes are outside of the area of interest of the stakeholder and would have no impact on that stakeholder
- Non-Stat Severn Link Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes are outside of the area of interest of the stakeholder and would have no impact on that stakeholder
- Non-Stat Global Innovation (IBM) Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes are outside of the area of interest of the stakeholder and would have no impact on that stakeholder
- Non-Stat Bridgwater and District Trades Union Council
Y Y N N N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes are outside of the area of interest of the stakeholder and would have no impact on that stakeholder
- Non-Stat RAC Foundation Y Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on the highway network, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Save Cannington Action Group
N Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes are outside of the area of interest of the stakeholder and would have no impact on that stakeholder
- Non-Stat UCATT Wales and South West Region
N Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
- Non-Stat Open Space Society N Y Y Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on open spaces, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Somerset Otter Group N N N Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
- Non-Stat Sydenham Neighbourhood Planning Group
N N N N N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes are outside of the area of interest of the stakeholder and would have no impact on that stakeholder
- Non-Stat Babcock International Group N N N Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes are outside of the area of interest of the stakeholder and would have no impact on that stakeholder
- Non-Stat Federation of Bridgwater Practices
N N N Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes are outside of the area of interest of the stakeholder and would have no impact on that stakeholder
- Non-Stat Junction 24 Action Group N N N Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes are outside of the area of interest of the stakeholder and would have no impact on that stakeholder
- Non-Stat Sedgemoor District Labour Group
N N N Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
- Non-Stat Magna West Somerset Housing Association Limited
N N N Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on housing, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Sustrans N N N Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on the cycle network, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Non-Stat Huntspill and Burnham District Wildfowlers
N N N Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on the wildfolwers activities, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
s.42Category of Consultee
Consultee Category Consultation Body or Consultee Number
Site Name (or note)
1 2 2u J24
1 2 2u J24
Proposed to be consulted for MDS NMC (No.3 NMC for HPC Project)Stages Consulted At (* Returned to Sender)
s.48 Notice Sent
- Non-Stat Cyclists Touring Club (CTC) N N N Y N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
The proposed changes would have no direct impact on the cycle network, therefore it falls outside the remit of this stakeholder
- Local resident Residents of 135, 137, 139, 141, 143, 145, 147, 149, 151, 153, 155, 157, 159, 161, 163, 165 and 167 Bath Road, Bridgwater
N N N N N/AN/A N/AN/A The proposed changes would have no direct impact on this stakeholder, given the nature of the change and the proximity from the landowner's land holding