ANNETTE ENEMARKDirector of Tetraplan (DK)

You are……familiar with the S.U.M.P planning process

Stand up

…an experienced S.U.M.P’er

Keep standing Otherwise: Sit right back

Special European Barometer: Attitudes of European towards Urban Mobility, 2013

Will mobility conditions change? 24% belive it will improve

37% belive it will be worse

35% belive it will be the same

One-third of the memberstates feel their access in cities are beeing limited

In more than half the memberstates congestion is an important urban problem

38% of citizens encounter problems when traveling within cities

Special European Barometer: Attitudes of European towards Urban Mobility, 2013

Who should fix the problems..

56% City authorities

52% Citizens themselves

28% Regional authorities

27% National Government

3% Private companies

The story of S.U.M.P.

Action Plan on Urban Mobility (2009)

White Paper (2011)

Urban Mobility Package (2013)

Funding optionsHorizon 2020

INTEREG

Civitas Activity Fund ...

SUMP vs. traditional planning

  The Transport planner

The SUMP Way The Urban planner

Approach Access to roads, busses, bike lanes…

The need of the traveller

All things at the right place

Aim Optimize capacity Optimize mobility Optimize land use

Focus Reduction of risks, as accidents, noise, pollution

Accessibility Reduction of negative impacts from other functions

Solution Hardware solutions Software and hardware solution

Strict land use laws

Understanding of mobility

Movement from A to B in time and space

More than from A to B

A side-effect to be managed

Adapted with pride from: Mobility researchers from Aalborg University, The SUMP manual , Can Less sometimes be more? Integrating land use and transport, 2013,

Sce

nari

o

Base

d o

n t

he U

rban P

lanner

Model, V

EM

A.

Form

elm

.dk

-80%

-60%

-40%

-20%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

Changes in modal split if...

Scenario of 100 families Changes in modal split if...

Mult

i fam

ily

All bik

e

All Public

tra

nspor

t

½ p

arki

ng

Full

Mon

ty

-80%

-60%

-40%

-20%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

Car

Bike /walk

Public Transport

Modalsplit 100 singleFamily Houses

The many devils …

The siloes

The outreach to internal and external partners

The active engagement with the public

Setting targets and evaluating effects

Finding the funding

Securing political backing

Time consuming

Interactions in the mobility management sector: new coopera-tions, techniques, solutions, ECOMM 1999.Regional aspects of MM, ECOMM 2000.Responsible mobility - active partnerships,

ECOMM 2002.Managing transport demand to attain sustainable development and economic effectiveness, ECOMM 2003.Transition

toward a sustainable urban mobility: demonstrate to convince, ECOMM 2004. Delivering attractive options for sustainable travel in different

stages of life – current demands shaping the future of travel, ECOMM

2005.Accessibility and attractiveness of cities, ECOMM

2006.The future and MM, ECOMM 2007.TDM - Tackling Climate Change, ECOMM 2008. Cost/benefit and evaluation of

MM, ECOMM 2009. Moving people - bridging spaces, ECOMM

2010. Economic Recession: A new dawn for MM, ECOMM 2011. MM -

Key Factor for European development, ECOMM 2012. Smart choices require easy access – the challenge of making MM a part of

every day life, ECOMM 2013. Creating the bridge to a green,

fair and prosperous mobility future, ECOMM 2014.

GOODPRACTICES.U.M.P.

Cop

en

hag

en

– v

isio

n a

nd

goal sett

ing

Borrowed - with thanks - from Dr. Susanne Böhler-Baedeker, Rupprecht Consult

West o

f En

gla

nd

partn

ersh

ip

– institu

tion

al c

oop

era

tion

Birm

ing

ham

– in

teg

ratin

g e

nerg

y a

nd

m

ob

ility p

lan

nin

g

Gent – consequent sustainable urban mobility planning

Vie

nn

a

– q

uality

-con

trolled

u

rban

mob

ilit

y s

trate

gy

Dresden– stakeholder and citizen involvement

Is S.U.M.P.the new black?