anjali arora vs national thermal power corporationsupreme court guidelines in favour of...

Upload: abilitytowin

Post on 30-May-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/14/2019 Anjali Arora vs National Thermal Power CorporationSUPREME COURT GUIDELINES IN FAVOUR OF DIFFERENTLYABLE

    1/2

    Anjali Arora vs National Thermal Power Corporation

    In The High Court Of Delhi At New DelhiC.W.P.No. 7120 Of 2002

    In a case that sets precedence, Anjali Arora under the counsel of Ashok Agarwal, Social

    Jurist, New Delhi, challenged the Constitutional validity of the rejection of her candidatureby the National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd, for the post of Assistant Law Officer as hereducational qualifications did not meet the criteria.

    The details:

    1. Anjali Arora is visually challenged with a Degree in Law from the Delhi Universityand is enrolled as an Advocate with the Delhi State Bar Council since 1998.

    2. She applied for the post of Assistant Law Officer under the "Physically Handicapped"category for a post advertised in Employment News dated 28th September-4thOctober 2002. The post required a Graduate Degree in Law (Professional) from arecognized University with at least 60% marks (only Pass marks required for SC/ STcandidates).

    3. Anjali Arora completed her degree of law in 1998 with 58.73%. Her candidature wasrejected on the grounds that she did not fulfill the minimum criteria of 60 percent ofmarks.

    The discrepancies:

    In terms of OM No. 14016/1/85-Estt. (SCT) Deptt. Personnel and Training, Govt. of Indiadated 04.09.1995, candidates belonging to physically handicapped category are also legallyentitled to the same benefits /relaxations as other reserved quotas.

    The judgment:

    Order passed: 15.07.2003

    The court directed the NTPC to give relaxation to physically handicapped candidates as isavailable to scheduled caste/scheduled tribe candidates in educational qualifications ie, passmarks. This concession would have to be reviewed after five years.

    The OM from the GI Deptt. Per. & Trg.OM No. 14016/1/85-Estt. (SCT) dated 04.09.1995 isas under:

    Subject: Relaxed standard of selection of physically handicapped person

    against reserved vacancies.

    According to the instructions in this department's O.M NO. 1/1/70- Estt. (SCT), dated2.07.1970 (See Order 7 under Section 2) in the case of direct recruitment, whether byexamination or otherwise, if sufficient number of Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribescandidates are not available on basis of the general standard to fill all the vacanciesreserved for them. Candidates belonging to the communities are allowed to be selected

    under the relaxed standard of selection to make up the deficiency in the reserved quota,subject to the fitness of these candidates for appointment to the post/posts in question. Thequestion of extending this concession to physically handicapped persons has also beenunder consideration of the government of India and it has been decided that the

  • 8/14/2019 Anjali Arora vs National Thermal Power CorporationSUPREME COURT GUIDELINES IN FAVOUR OF DIFFERENTLYABLE

    2/2

    instructions of the OM dated the 25 July, 1970 aforementioned will apply mutatis mutandisto physically handicapped persons also".